


May 13, 2010
Shoot Me Down: Camouflage Is Overrated For Deer Hunting
By Dave Hurteau
Camo is overrated for deer according to our own ENO (pictured below), winner of the previous “Shoot Me Down,” whose research and use of an outside source impressed me enough to offer him the coveted prize of doing my job for me, as a guest blogger. Put another way, ENO is my guest. So, as I’ve said before, be nice. Disagree, certainly. Nail him to the wall if you must. But be nice about it.
With that, here’s ENO:
I guess the reward for shooting someone down is the opportunity to get shot down myself, huh? Okay, here goes: Camouflage is overrated for deer hunting.
I realize that if my wife reads this I will have to negotiate myself out of a garage sale, but still. . . I have multiple plastic containers in my basement full of neatly folded clothing arranged by camouflage pattern. I have my favorite turkey hunting patterns, bow hunting patterns, varmint, waterfowl, western plains, and so on. Recently, I looked at a new line of camo with the latest digital patterns, which will probably result in another plastic container in my basement. But aren’t we all just fooling ourselves?
Last year, after spending the entire bow season dressed head-to-toe in camo, I shot this buck on opening day of the gun seaso—while walking out to my stand, in broad daylight, standing in the middle of a grassy pasture, dressed completely in blaze orange. The buck walked less than thirty yards from me at the edge of the woods. What’s more, my father-in-law, also pictured, was standing right next me dressed completely in blaze orange. We got into a bit of an argument about who should shoot this deer, until he finally insisted that I shoot.
I know what you’re thinking, “. . . another armchair expert enlightening us with his anecdotal evidence.” I’ll give you that. But I challenge you to look at some of the old black-and-white hunting photos from the good ol’ days. Those guys hunted in their blue jeans, work boots, and plaid shirts. They were such successful hunters they almost ruined it for the rest of us. If they could see the camouflage fashionistas we’ve become, they’d heel and hide us to a barn door.
I stand by my statement: Camouflage is overrated. Stand with me, or shoot me down.
Comments (94)
I'll stand with you, I only wore cammo for a while before going with the comfortable standys of jeans and a regular coat. Colorado requires enough 100 squares of blaze orange, so a solid blaze orange vest and hat are the only "hunting" specific clothes I go with.
I completely agree with you. I also have stacks of camo clothing that is pretty much unnecessary except for spring turkey season. As long as you stay still and don't wear light colored clothes, the deer will generally not see you---with the exception of extreme close bow range. Even then, they are likely to smell you before they see you. At any distance, most camo clothing becomes a dark blob, so the best thing you can do is to break up your outline---watch how the deer do it.
For deer hunting I am with you. I arrowed a buck a couple of years ago while wearing my tan brush pants and a plain green shirt.
But I am also with you on the plastic bins full of camo - dry warm weather, warm rainy weather, cold weather, extreme cold weather .... seems the best hunting clothes come in camo so that is what I've got.
The deer in the picture did not see you or was unsure of what you were. We wear camoflage for the purpose of concealment, thereby hiding our presence from deer. Now, if I can choose to alert the deer to my presence visually or to hide myself, I'll choose the latter, everytime. Is sticking out like a sore thumb umderrated? When I draw my bow back on a deer at thirty yards, I want my outline to blend with my surroundings instead of having clean lines sweeping through the canopy that scream, "look at me, I listened to ENO".
I agree, I'm as guilty as anyone for having camo head to toe, even for rifle deer, but know it's overkill. Guys in full blaze orange jumpsuits can have luck, guys in their work clothes, etc. all have luck. It's just like anything else, it's being marketed to the hunter, even if it's not actually needed...but it's still nice to have.
I've certainly been on a walk in normal clothes, with my face and arms exposed (they are a little dark and hairy, but not camoflagued) and had deer look at me with no idea what I was all while in bow range. However considering most of my hunting is bow hunting and done from the ground and not in a blind, I'll take all the help I can get. Our fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers did nearly ruin hunting for us all without camoflage, however unlike most of us, if they didn't kill something they didn't eat (as much), they didn't have the same restrictions or seasons, they certainly didn't pass up a spike to wait for a bigger buck. This could account for a lot of their success.
I myself beleive that camo is not really a must but very close. Yes, back then our gradfathers, or fathers hunted in plaid but deer were not as pressured. With easier to use gear, more and more people are getting into hunting. With more people, the deer probably learned that the human in the tree is not a good thing. Think of it this way, if you were being hunted but not knowing that you are a target and you see somthing that stands out, you may be curious and not very fearful. But after awhile you learn that the thing is out to kill you so everytime you see it now, you learn to run. The object of camo is to blend in. You would notice the original object if it didnt blend, but if you couldnt see it, whats there to fear? I think years ago camo wasnt as necessary. But now they are heavily pressured so it is necessary to blend in. Even in non pressured areas now camo may not be a must. But personally, I think camo is good. Just not for under pressured areas. Maybe i didnt go with the flow of the Shoot Me Down subject. But thats my argument about camo.
That small buck was young and naive. Should have let him grow a couple more years. Yes camou is sometimes not needed especially when you shoot young and dumb deer. Try doing without it while turkey or duck hunting and let me know how many birds you bag. Think I will hang on to my camou.
For many years I hunted in plain khaki pants and shirt, with an orange vest as required by Mississippi law, I found that the terrain I hunted in, hills and hollows of hardwood, that khaki and orange were perfect camoflage during the muzzleloader season, (first 2 weeks of Dec).
What really mattered most was motion. Move only when you have to and are certain the deer is not looking toward you and all will be well.
I am cheap. There I said it. I wear a few pieces of camo (jacket, pants, shirts, thong underwear) that is readily available at wal-mart. I don't seem to have issues regarding being seen it's mostly being heard or smelt. maybe camo just makes you feel sneakier. or maybe it's like chicks not having too many shoes. I don't know.
I will agree with your 100% in regards to deer hunting. While camo may help to conceal you from a deer, it really comes down to two things. Sitting still and proper stand placement. By reducing your movement, you increase your odds of a deer not seeing you regardless of what you are reading. Also proper stand placement with branches or bushes to break up your silhouette. It does not matter if your wearing a 80's hot pink warmup outfit in the field if you sit still and break up your silhouette.
*wearing not reading - not sure where my mind was at
I had one of the most productive years hunting on a working cattle farm, i wore carhartts just like the farmer and farm hands wore, the deer paid little attention to me.
I am yet to find a totally suitable camo pattern for the wide open hunting spaces of the Rockies and surrounding deserts. Many efforts have been made by various manufacturers mostly with very limited success. The problem is from 200-600 yards the camo attired hunter stands out as a green, gray, or tan moving blob. Consequently I notice many local hunters as well as outfitters who simply slide their required orange vest over a tan Carhart coat or other neutral colored outter garment. The result is about the same as the fellow who spent hundreds of dollars for the latest camo scent free gear. In fact the working cowboys who also enjoy a good elk hunt usually can't afford more than their daily work clothes so they double as hunting attire. My dad used to do the same thing for the same reason. These guys often get their bull.
100% agree so overrated i sit on the side on a hill with my rifle in brown not a bit of camo. I killed a 154 buck and im 14 and a 107 for my first buck the 107 at 50 yds the other at 140.
Hey del read the title "Camo is overrated for DEER" not turkeys
I agree with you. I shoot deer every year with a blaze orange vest and hat. In every case, the deer knew exactly where I was and what was up.
I do in fact wear camo under the blaze orange, primarily because it hides the dirt, blood and the fact its the same pair of pants I had on five days ago.
In other words, forget the scent-bloc, the mossy oak, the real tree and hope the wind doesn't change direction and don't move even to scratch an itch. Because Dude, after 5 days in the same pants, you will want to scratch something.
Well i have hunted both with and withouth camo alot and know that to the actual prey it doesnt matter much what colour and camopattern i use. or if i use it at all. has to do with theire sense of colour if at all etc. but i have missed a few chances cos i didnt use camo when other species actually saw me and reacted to me and "warned" my actual prey off to my location.. so to some species camo works to others not. so ill wear my camo while hunting to be "silent" in the terrain to all species living there..
But as camo a ghuillie suit would work best cos it wouldnt just blend u in colourwise but also blur your outline.. and that would work on deer too :P
I think camo is important for bowhunters.
I stand with you but Its deffinitly necesary for bowhunting and turkey hunting.
when i shot my first buck ever a small spike i was wearing blue sweatpants and a blue sweatshirt with my blaze orange hat and sneakers on but i still wear the camo
I agree only to a point. For a gun hunter it probably is not neccessary, as long as they are still, with a good wind. Bowhunting, maybe the camo pattern is not as important, as just covering your face and hands with something, to cover that glowing skin.As the others said, the first turkey that sees you, the game is over for while. As an outfitter, the biggest joke I see, is the whole scent lock craze. I can appreciate not leaveing excess residual scent in your area, but when I watch the guys going through their OCD steps to make themselves believe they are invisible, I have to shake my head. They still get winded when the deer gets down from them. It boils down to being quiet, still and only hunting spots that have a place for your scent to blow, when the wind is right, and a stealthy way in and out.
well i guess it cant hurt
well deer are color blind and you are right camo is over rated. I have killed plenty of deer wearing a green wool coat and pants in the hard woods with snow on the ground. some as close as twenty yards . you can fool their eyes with out much trouble , now their nose thats a different story.
I stand with you. I have a full scent blocker suit (underwear, base layers, the whole nine yards) that I bow hunt in. I gave that a shot the first two days of Illinois firearm season and between being frozen to the bone and seeing any deer anyway I opted for dirty jeans, a flannel shirt, and Carhartt bibs with plenty of blaze orange mind you. I got into the woods at about 11am and had four deer on the ground by the end of shooting hours. I stuffed several peoples' freezers and was comfortable doing it.
Ill stand with you. All thoose people think they need to buy fancy camo with scent locker and all that stuuf. WASTE OF MONEY!!! My buddy shot a 5.5 year old 11 point on state land sitting at the bottom of a tree with no camo on at all. The dear was also down wind. Shot was taken a 6 yards with a .308 win.
Oh, and for those folks who say that you should have let that deer live a couple more years are full of crap. This is the real world. Not a game ranch in Texas with big fences. NICE DEER!
that's exactly what I was thinking Del, just try hunting turkey and ducks without full camo and you will be sorry. I use a full body leafy suit for turkeys. i even suit up for deer because I hunt almost all of my deer from the ground doing spot and stalk. I need as much help as I can get when I am on the same level as the deer.
While I will admit that wearing camo will never hurt you while hunting, I do believe it is a very overrated item in the deer hunting community. I hunt with a solid blaze orange suit during gun season and camo or normal work cloths during bow season. As far as I can tell the deer don't seem to act any differently or see me sooner when I'm wearing all blaze orange. I think as long as you are still and play the wind right, it doesn't matter what you wear.
For example, one night I was walking back from my stand through an open field during a full moon when I saw a couple deer coming my way. It was after shooting hours but I figured I'd watch them and see where they went. I stood perfectly still amd the darn things walked right past me at about 5 yards. I couldn't believe it, I was standing there with nothing around and a bright orange suit on. They could tell I was something but they didn't know I was alive until they passed me and I tried to move my head slightly to watch them leave. The second my head moved they were off like a shot. And these were heavily pressured deer too, not some tame game farm deer. From that moment on I haven't worried much about the clothing I wear, I think if you're good enough at staying still and quiet and only moving when the deer is looking away, it makes no difference what color or pattern you are wearing.
I will agree. No amount of camo can fully conceal movement. It does help, but I would say is not a necessity.
First of all, great buck ENO and your picture is destined to become a family heirloom.
Second, Camo is overrated. I killed both of my deer last year with a long bow from the ground. Hunting from the ground and consistently being within a few feet of deer you learn quickly its movement and not camo that keeps you hidden.
My first bow kill was in 1981. I was wearing jeans and a plaid flannel shirt. When i shot my largest deer in 2006 I was wearing a solid green pullover and yellow fishing cap.
I no longer wear camo gloves or face mask. It's just a waste unless they are keeping you warm.
Oops. Accidently hit enter.
I think the only exception would be snow camo. With a blanket of snow on the ground nothing beats white camo. I was sitting on the ground last year and had a small doe feed within inches of my boot. Very cool.
Camo is not only overrated but over used. Don't you think it's silly to have camo knives, lighters, calls, flashlights...
Just think about all the deer that busted you for not breaking up your outline (somehow) and you never saw them at all! LOL
Camo is over done and maybe a little overrated, but I don't leave home without it! Go ahead and freeze your axx off in those cotton Levi's and Wrangler's!
I am more than a little suspicious here. It is called "Shoot Me Down" for a reason. It is against the grain, yet most of you agree? Don't get me wrong, every environment deserves an appropriate pattern but, my point is, camo is effective. How many of you that agree go hunting in clothes that are not primarily camouflage? "I have a truckload of camo but it is overrated."??? Makes no sense. I would have to say that according to the responses to this post, camo is far underrated.
Dann, the deer knew where you were and what was up? So they walked right into the shooting gallery? Suicidal deer? I doubt that. Also, camo does not hide dirt or the fact that you never do laundry.
For deer you may be right..but for ducks, in heavily hunted areas, camo is a must..they can spot an eyeball at 300 yards....
I have pet ducks ( part of my live decoy program lol), They can spot a jet at 30,000 feet out of their peripheral vision....you can bet they can see your face and jeans and anything that doesn't blend in to the surroundings....
Ok I have heard it all caught fish out of a mud puddle shot deer in my bath robe while eating a biscuit. I want to know why we would subject ourselves to such a broad general statement. In Georgia we have 90 days of rifle season if you count the muzzle loader season. Up north some states have 7 days of hunting season. Why the habitat in Georgia is thick as well you can get. To harvest a deer of any size you must get into his living room and if you are hunting on public land it is very difficult. We arent hunting the farm belt or the feeders or the baited fields we are hunting the thick georgia briars and pines and you better be quiet not stink and have your human silhouette unless you like tag soup!
I think you can make an agruement either way you cut this. In the end, is camo a requirement to hunt successfully, no. With that said, has camo become the "uniform" for the modern hunter, yes.
All of the high tech. hunting gear today is over rated and over priced. You really don't need any of it to kill a deer. Just a gun and the knowledge of deer.
It has its times it is very important.
I definitely agree, all the die hard hunters I know that are over the age of 30 still wear green wool pants and blaze orange and they still kill big deer every year. It seems like that generation just missed out on all the advertising on tv telling them they need camo to kill deer...
I'm actually pretty convinced that you can get away with minimal camo even for bowhunting deer, and with a rifle in hand, why even bother with camo? But I end up in camo pants because they tend to be the best design for bowhunting -- quiet material, pockets in the right places, tear-resistant.
With the trend towards blind-hunting for turkeys, camo isn't probably that vital there anymore, right?
He's right, it is a waste.
As he notes look at old photos and it's obvious.
Actually camo didn't become popular until circa 1980 when Rambo came out and even then it was more a pop culture fad.
Soon the hunting industry picked up the banner and began aggressive marketing campaigns for hunters. It has exploded since then, with all the various patterns the guy mentions. All of which are about as useful as designer, logo emblazoned clothes.
The basis of camo is to break up an outline, which is easily done by wearing a pattern. It doesn't have to be an exact match, pattern or color wise, to whatever the background you are in, just break up the outline. Especially for deer, which have poor eyesight. Even turkeys, who have excellent eyes do not need special patterns.
Then there is the whole domestication angle. Most wildlife, except that in very rural areas, are conditioned to seeing humans. So why the camo, except your a fad following tool or mucho macho moron?
I think its overated in the rifle part. Just cause the shooting distance is greater an you dont really need camo when your shooting at 150+ yards.I could sit down along a hillside,creek bottom or fenceline in my every day clothes an wait for a shot at a deer that happens to wonder by. The same goes for walking if I play the wind right.Bow hunting is a whole different story im out in full camo I'll take every advantage of concealment i can.
Yes, it is overrated, to a certain extent. Anybody see the movie "Shooter?" There's a deleted scene on the DVD where the main good guy, a former marine sniper, says, "Camoflage" is something you do, not something you wear." So, are the camo-colored clothes we think about useful for deer hunting?
They are if you think about it in terms of breaking up your man-shaped outline and blending in to the background so that you won't be perceived by the deer. But you can do that with almost any kind of clothing. I've seen black and white pictures of a guy wearing a Hawaiian shirt and he blended in quite well into a tree. So, with using camo to hunt deer, I believe it's the pattern, not the colors. Even a clown suit would work if you don't move. If you want "real" camo, you should wear a ghillie suit or tie grass, leaves, and twigs to your clothes. Otherwise, anything that blends in will work.
I believe that at least 95% of the camo clothing patterns sold today are designed to attract hunters and their wallets. Most are no more or less effective for firearms deer hunting than the plaid pattern of yesteryear, depending on the hunters behavior and use of cover.
That said, a number of years ago I had a doe not like what she was seeing while I was sitting absolutely still on a shooting stool wearing a ghillie suit during bow season. I was not taking advantage of any other cover, so here is this weird looking mound in her woods she didn't want to walk by. She didn't spook, but she stomped a bit and the group took a large enough detour so I didn't get a shot.
This past season, I had a large buck that I had called see me about 10 minutes before legal light. I was walking in to where I was going to hunt, and heard him thrashing the brush and chasing does so I tried to keep him around with a grunt call. I was wearing my firearms season clothing (orange vest, orange camo jacket) and a black watch cap because it was still basically dark. He came out from behind a tree about 40 yards away and looked right at me for half a second, and left rapidly. He didn't wind me and I didn't move, but I believe he recognized a human face and head as something he didn't want to stick around for.
I have had good success with my solid orange brimmed hat and solid orange vest over an orange camo coat, all in wool. I wear green wool pants but at times have wondered if I should try ghillie pants with my orange upper body clothing. The reason is I mostly still hunt on public land, and if you squat down to look in the woods, often you can see a lot further at waist and knee height than at human head height. There are always a few deer that spook that I don't see, and I believe they have seen my leg or foot move.
Effective camo to me is less about clothing and more use of cover, control of movement and noise. What camo is not to me is a fashion statement. My hunting clothes are not worn other than hunting.
I agree. As far as deer are concerned, camouflage IS overrated. I might add, I won't wear denim jeans either.
I don't wear camouflage; I usually wear dark wool (green or gray) trousers, red plaid wool shirts (Pendleton, Woolrich, etc.), an UnderArmour undershirt, maybe a vest, with a goose down or synthetic fiber overgarment, depending on ambient temperature. If regulations require wearing blaze orange, I'll wear it as a vest.
I don't disagree with those who choose to wear camouflage or criticize their choice; I simply don't think it's a decisive issue for deer because I haven't worn it when I've taken deer in the past. I don't think deer are swayed by the same advertisements and marketing efforts that influence us.
Having written that, I see camouflage as a sensible choice for ducks, geese and turkeys. But this opinion focuses on deer, and I agree with ENO.
I agree 100%.
yrs-
Evan!
Agreed....with a caveat.
It's not completely useless. The give away is CONTRAST, not color/pattern. You can wear some bright colors if your background is bright (see sky) or dark colors on the ground, but if you are wearing a a standard RealTree for example in a barren tree with bright, cloudy skies, a deer below you will see you everytime. Same pattern on the ground, you are probably ok.
I think that we wear the different camo patterns to make a fashion statement. After all we have to have the latest on the market, last years camo just won't do. You are completely out of style if your camo pattern is several years old. It's not what the deer see its what the hunters see. The only reason I wear some camo is because some of the better gore tex soft models only come in camo. I guess the finer clothing in solid colors just wouldn't sell so we will play the camo game. When we all get dressed on opening morning you can see everyone eyeing up everyone's new camo clothing.
I don't care what color you wear, so long as you don't require me to wear blaze orange.
I mostly hunt deer in red/black wool, but i won't be happy if my state makes an orange requirement other than public land.
camo is the best
well i am with Del from kansas, your buck was a very young imature deer that wasn't very wise to hunting pressure but you give him 2-3 more years in the woods and you'll never get to within 100yds of the same deer. Yes there arre times when camo isn't a must but if your trophy hunting the big boys then better wash your clothes and weear the camo.
I think camo is overrated however, it is better than a solid block of color. I don't hunt in jeans when I can avoid it as I find them too noisy in the brush. I have some lightweight camo pants for the warmer hunts and some old miltary (OD Green) wool pants for the cold stuff. I have hunted successfully in red plaid and orange plaid wool shirts/jackets with an average shot distance of under 100 yds. The plaid pattern breaks up o persons outline so they are less distiguishable to game. My personal theory is movement and smell will give you away quicker than sight. The solid block of color just draws the animal's eyes to you and amplifies any movment. Of course in the states that require a certain amount of blaze this solid block cannot be avoided. I do have a blaze vest and hat that I use where required.
Good topic i would prefer to wear black in some of my tree stand sets it would just break my outline up better. My opinion you can slack on camo if your in good spot or can really brush in your stands. I think i could hunt with dark clothing which i guess you could say is a form of camo. Deer un-pushed by hunter pressure basically bow hunting the deer do notice subtle changes in there habitat camo just helps have them not notice its a person.
i dunnno but i like it any way i were it to school and i have a camo hat on right now realtree hardwoods to be exact!!
I believe all this hype about camo, scent control, and such is just another marketing gimmick. I hunt in comfortable "civilian" clothing and boots, wash my clothes normally and bath in my regular soap. I kill an average of 7 deer and at least 1 turkey, hogs, squirrels, and yotes every year.
Camo is a yuppie thing. a fashion statement.
heres a man who killed a young nieve 2 1/2 year old buck with a rifle,theres no tellin how far he was when he took the shot,this doesnt really tell us very much does it??bottom line is if your hunt requires u to get within 60 yards then camo is a must.camo is all about blending in to your surroundings.we r not 100 percent sure that deer r colour blind,but a red flannel shirt doesnt look like a tree and branches regardless.
Wearing camoflage for hunting deer is like wearing a marching band uniform for working in a mine. The deer don't care. It's movement that they care about and only particular kinds of movement. People who wear camo to hunt deer only demonstrate a kind of foolishness for which the reward of not being seen by other hunters is a higher risk of being shot, all for the sole purpose of making a fashion statement.
But hey. Someone has to keep Cabelas in business, so carry on all you Camofashionistas.
Deer can easily pick out an outline Diehl, you need something to break up your profile, especially if you hunt deer no the ground. Listening to all these people you would think that deer are half blind and stupid.
Like stated earlier, its all about breaking up your silhouette. Sure if you have some braches or a bush near you doing that for you, you don't necessarily need camo. Camo can do that in more situations than solid or straight line patterns. So, in the long run you would be wise to use camo.
I stand by my statement: Camo isn't overated. It is a very effective tool to have with you and in your arsenal.
And yes, i have also walked up on unsuspecting deer who didn't see me. It was about 15 yards away. But I think i could've been wearing anything or even naked, but that deer wouldn't have seen me. Its mind was somewhere else. It was a very young deer, a button-buck to be specific, and it was too oblivious to its surrounding. It had nothing to do with the hunters in this situation.
But yes, I did happen to be wearing camo.
It does help. Can you hunt and be successful without it - sure, for thousands of years they did. They also didn't use leupold optics, cartridges that can reach out there hundreds of yards, code blue estrous, grunt tubes, hand warmers, gore-tex, thinsulate, polypro, in-lines, (real men use match or wheel locks :o), or hornady light-magnums to eek out a little bit more performance from that favorite hunting round. All these things give you an edge.
I remember hunting in PA as a youngster, before I had the money for camo. I was sitting under a tree, jeans and a flannel shirt (like you ENO). I was half asleep and heard a twig snap, opened my eyes to see a little doe about 15 ft from me. Surprised the cr-p out of both of us... If I was wearing camo, maybe she'd a run me over!
fun "shoot me down" though!
to me it’s something that adds the fun ,it makes me feel like i’m a spy or a soldier.Using my camo to hide from my enemy.but I did shoot my deer in nothing but a pair of jeans boots and a blue sweater.
I was able to walk up to 30 yards in the open on a 4x4 Mule Deer during Javelina Season in Arizona with Blaze Orange coat, pants and hat.
Ive said it 50 times, camo is unnecessary, we wore olive green ripstops in Nam and they wore black as long as we or they were still it was dificult to spot either. Tiger stripes and trying to look like salad or molting tree is silly and a waste of money.
I guess you can look like the Great Pumpkin and still sneak up on a deer! LOL
I'll agree with ya for deer. But I'll still camo it up. If not and a big buck seen me I know I'd be kicking myself for not wearing camo.
Hey guys...I've been out turkey hunting and didn't even realize this was posted. Thanks for all the feed back. Haven't heard much to convince me otherwise yet.
And thanks Del for letting me know hold old and wise that deer is. I was going around telling people it was five and half years old with a Master's Degree in Norwegian MN Hunter Identification from Phoenix Online University. Boy do I feel like an idiot.
I think you have totally misunderstood the reason for and use of camo.
It's similar to bike riders wearing tight racing clothes when out for a leasurely Sunday pedal around the neighborhood. We not only do sports we wear the clothes of the sport to tell everyone that we are a part of the sport.
Somewhere I'd like to see a comparison of the yearly profit from hunting clothes, versus the profit off guns and ammo.
I disagree... here's why,
to start out with the least important reason for my disagreement on camo being overrated i'd say this, when i got on this post there were 70+ comments... about 10% disagreed with you... doesn't seem like that follows with what you were saying...
but the more important reason i disagree is this, most hunters who hunt now would agree that the sport is sadly dwindling in it's participants... Maybe not hugely yet, but it is! To start a change in that downward spiral we need to introduce more people to hunting, the majority will be youngsters (like myself lol) and most of you will agree that they won't be able to hold still well enough that regular clothes would hide them from the deer. Thus CAMO... although i believe that the pattern of the camo is not a huge thing, the fact that it breaks up the form is what's important! we need all the help we can get keeping kids in this sport since they are the future of it! So why not help them out as much as we can? Sure, someone who has the patience and self-control to keep still can fool lots of deer... but by the time you get the age and wisdom necessary to figure that out it's time to pass on the skills, and camo is gonna help! :)
So is camo overrated? It sounds like it is for ENO, i mean it would take a lot to have a yard sale with :P but i think it's not overrated if you look at the future of the sport and the part camo play's in it.
I'll keep wearing my camo, washed in scentfree detergent and air dried. I bow hunt mostly and have been busted on stand just from blinking my eyes. I have many deer that walk under my stand, dont think that would happen if I didn't wear scentfree camo.
OK,OK I realize that in your state that might be a trophy buck. Just keep in mind QDM works great. In Missouri and Kansas we pass on bucks that size many times every year. Last season my take was 4 antlerless deer for meat and herd culling. I Let at least a dozen bucks walk, some bigger than that one. Also watched a kid shoot his first deer which was more fun than shooting my own trophy. It was a 1.5 year old 7 pt and the kid was very proud. Next year he will be looking for an older deer.
Lot's of Kansas farmers wear Carharts. Just might give that a try next fall. BTW most of the time when hunting ducks, turkeys and bowhunting I wear the same old 3d suit over whatever. It works very well if I don't nove at the wrong time.
Right now I am testing the new Bushnell 2010 model trailcam and it looks like this will be a keeper. Will post some photos soon.
The two biggies that give one away in any type of hunting (fur or fowl) is either scent or movement.
Camo will reduce visibility of small movements however smart critters have learned to detect even the slightest motion. I have hunted ducks and geese since I was a teenager and have had many successful waterfowl hunts wearing plaid jackets and jeans.
I have also shot as many deer in jeans as I have in camo. I do use a scent reduction detergent that is devoid of color and UV enhancers when I wash my clothes. Scent reduction however can always be mitigated by trying to remain downwind of one's quarry.
I still wear camo occasionally, but I will heartily agree that I don't have to.
JohnR- You probably should use more scent prevention if the "fowl" in your area are winding you.
The old plaid jackets seem to have the ability to break up your outline and since deer are relatively colorblind, the color doesn't seem to be so important as contrast. Movement and taking advantage of cover, and being acutely aware of your background and light/shadows is more important than camo patterns. Ask any good recon man you run across.
"Deer can easily pick out an outline Diehl, you need something to break up your profile, especially if you hunt deer no the ground. Listening to all these people you would think that deer are half blind and stupid."
No, they can't. They're mostly attuned to movement. If you're moving in Camo, they'll see you. If you're motionless and completely wrapped in blaze orange flagging tape, they won't see you.
Also, particular kinds of movement seem to matter more. If you're acting like a predator they figure out what you're about faster. If you dance-stepped down a logging road singing the Lumberjack Song they'd prolly line up to watch the show.
I guess I'll shoot you down. Cammo is great for breaking up your silhouette and hiding movement. but what is camouflage? If you are siting in the corner of a field taking 75 plus yard shots then you are camouflaged by distance. If your in a blind or up against a tree or a rock then you are camoflaged by your surroundings. that deer you shot was young and maby distracted by the rut.
Deer who see farm workers in work clothes all year long get use to seeing them. So during hunting season they don't see them as a threat until it's too late.
Camo really isn't necessary for deer hunting my dad has never worn cammo deer hunting. I like camo so I ware it any way, but i have never spent any money on camo. Mine is mostly old BDUs that my dad gave me when the Army switched to ACUs and he had no use for the BDUs anymore.
However varmint and Turkey hunting are another story. I plan on buying a gillie suit before next turkey season.
Oh and what Mike P. said about the cammo hat applies to me too. I realize that the cammo has little practical use but everybody knows what you think about guns, hunting, etc. when you're wearing a cammo hat with a deer head silhouette on it.
I think Scent Concealment is more important than camo, even though I think Scent-Lok doesn't work as advertised either. Keep your clothes in a air-tight box or bag and off you when not in the stand and you've got no scent. Motion control is probably the biggest downfall of any hunter. You've got to be still or all you'll see are whitetails pouncing off.
www.outdoorwriter.net
We kids used to have a little sport where i grew up as a fisherman up on the north coast. when we had time and was working on the docks for some reason and a seagull was sitting on a post nearby it was a sport sneaking up close to it little by little when it looked away from u (meaning beak directly at u) and grabbing the bird with your hands. and we did this sucessfully in blaze orange or signal pink or in our any other colour coveralls with thick lining, stinking of everything we came in contact with from marine diesel oil to fishguts. camo didnt make any difference there or scent. only thing that mattered was standing perfectly still when observed and moving silently when advancing.
Nuff said!
Oh, so deer can't see your profile? Really are you a deer? have you ever asked a deer? I didn't think so to either of the questions. Deer can most assuredly see a profile, have you ever had a mature buck just stare and stare and stare at you lowering his head and raising it back up trying to get you to move? He must be doing that because he is half blind and can's see a cotton picking thing! If it was my scent he would have been long gone, long before I ever came into sight. If you hunt on the ground a lot you will learn very quickly that deer can see profiles.
Camo is overrated but nice to have
Camo is overrated but nice to have
Unless you can neutralize your breath, you are just pissing in the wind.
heck i stalk within 10 yards of turkeys in jeans and a tee shirt all the time. camo is nice, and is certainly an advantage but it is not neccessary
ENO,
Your last comment is freaking funny. Thanks for the laugh. I hope you don't mind if I steal it...
Deer hunting yes its over rated, but we do have some smart deer where I hunt, so I'll take every advantage I can get.
I agree. You don't always need camo. My friend shot a 12 point buck wearing a blue t-shirt.
Camo may be overrated, but at least wearing it doesnt hurt your chances.
I think clothes are overrated period. I am going all natural.
I can’t help but find it amusing that people talk about how back in the day people wore flannel jackets and not camouflage. Just because it’s not real tree does not mean it’s not camouflage. Camouflage dose help with deer hunting it breaks up your outline so the deer don’t recognize what you are. It was made to help you blend in with your surroundings, not to make you invisible.
Post a Comment
I am cheap. There I said it. I wear a few pieces of camo (jacket, pants, shirts, thong underwear) that is readily available at wal-mart. I don't seem to have issues regarding being seen it's mostly being heard or smelt. maybe camo just makes you feel sneakier. or maybe it's like chicks not having too many shoes. I don't know.
That small buck was young and naive. Should have let him grow a couple more years. Yes camou is sometimes not needed especially when you shoot young and dumb deer. Try doing without it while turkey or duck hunting and let me know how many birds you bag. Think I will hang on to my camou.
I agree, I'm as guilty as anyone for having camo head to toe, even for rifle deer, but know it's overkill. Guys in full blaze orange jumpsuits can have luck, guys in their work clothes, etc. all have luck. It's just like anything else, it's being marketed to the hunter, even if it's not actually needed...but it's still nice to have.
I completely agree with you. I also have stacks of camo clothing that is pretty much unnecessary except for spring turkey season. As long as you stay still and don't wear light colored clothes, the deer will generally not see you---with the exception of extreme close bow range. Even then, they are likely to smell you before they see you. At any distance, most camo clothing becomes a dark blob, so the best thing you can do is to break up your outline---watch how the deer do it.
Hey guys...I've been out turkey hunting and didn't even realize this was posted. Thanks for all the feed back. Haven't heard much to convince me otherwise yet.
And thanks Del for letting me know hold old and wise that deer is. I was going around telling people it was five and half years old with a Master's Degree in Norwegian MN Hunter Identification from Phoenix Online University. Boy do I feel like an idiot.
Oops. Accidently hit enter.
I think the only exception would be snow camo. With a blanket of snow on the ground nothing beats white camo. I was sitting on the ground last year and had a small doe feed within inches of my boot. Very cool.
Camo is not only overrated but over used. Don't you think it's silly to have camo knives, lighters, calls, flashlights...
I agree only to a point. For a gun hunter it probably is not neccessary, as long as they are still, with a good wind. Bowhunting, maybe the camo pattern is not as important, as just covering your face and hands with something, to cover that glowing skin.As the others said, the first turkey that sees you, the game is over for while. As an outfitter, the biggest joke I see, is the whole scent lock craze. I can appreciate not leaveing excess residual scent in your area, but when I watch the guys going through their OCD steps to make themselves believe they are invisible, I have to shake my head. They still get winded when the deer gets down from them. It boils down to being quiet, still and only hunting spots that have a place for your scent to blow, when the wind is right, and a stealthy way in and out.
Well i have hunted both with and withouth camo alot and know that to the actual prey it doesnt matter much what colour and camopattern i use. or if i use it at all. has to do with theire sense of colour if at all etc. but i have missed a few chances cos i didnt use camo when other species actually saw me and reacted to me and "warned" my actual prey off to my location.. so to some species camo works to others not. so ill wear my camo while hunting to be "silent" in the terrain to all species living there..
But as camo a ghuillie suit would work best cos it wouldnt just blend u in colourwise but also blur your outline.. and that would work on deer too :P
The deer in the picture did not see you or was unsure of what you were. We wear camoflage for the purpose of concealment, thereby hiding our presence from deer. Now, if I can choose to alert the deer to my presence visually or to hide myself, I'll choose the latter, everytime. Is sticking out like a sore thumb umderrated? When I draw my bow back on a deer at thirty yards, I want my outline to blend with my surroundings instead of having clean lines sweeping through the canopy that scream, "look at me, I listened to ENO".
For deer hunting I am with you. I arrowed a buck a couple of years ago while wearing my tan brush pants and a plain green shirt.
But I am also with you on the plastic bins full of camo - dry warm weather, warm rainy weather, cold weather, extreme cold weather .... seems the best hunting clothes come in camo so that is what I've got.
"Deer can easily pick out an outline Diehl, you need something to break up your profile, especially if you hunt deer no the ground. Listening to all these people you would think that deer are half blind and stupid."
No, they can't. They're mostly attuned to movement. If you're moving in Camo, they'll see you. If you're motionless and completely wrapped in blaze orange flagging tape, they won't see you.
Also, particular kinds of movement seem to matter more. If you're acting like a predator they figure out what you're about faster. If you dance-stepped down a logging road singing the Lumberjack Song they'd prolly line up to watch the show.
I am yet to find a totally suitable camo pattern for the wide open hunting spaces of the Rockies and surrounding deserts. Many efforts have been made by various manufacturers mostly with very limited success. The problem is from 200-600 yards the camo attired hunter stands out as a green, gray, or tan moving blob. Consequently I notice many local hunters as well as outfitters who simply slide their required orange vest over a tan Carhart coat or other neutral colored outter garment. The result is about the same as the fellow who spent hundreds of dollars for the latest camo scent free gear. In fact the working cowboys who also enjoy a good elk hunt usually can't afford more than their daily work clothes so they double as hunting attire. My dad used to do the same thing for the same reason. These guys often get their bull.
I will agree with your 100% in regards to deer hunting. While camo may help to conceal you from a deer, it really comes down to two things. Sitting still and proper stand placement. By reducing your movement, you increase your odds of a deer not seeing you regardless of what you are reading. Also proper stand placement with branches or bushes to break up your silhouette. It does not matter if your wearing a 80's hot pink warmup outfit in the field if you sit still and break up your silhouette.
The two biggies that give one away in any type of hunting (fur or fowl) is either scent or movement.
Camo will reduce visibility of small movements however smart critters have learned to detect even the slightest motion. I have hunted ducks and geese since I was a teenager and have had many successful waterfowl hunts wearing plaid jackets and jeans.
I have also shot as many deer in jeans as I have in camo. I do use a scent reduction detergent that is devoid of color and UV enhancers when I wash my clothes. Scent reduction however can always be mitigated by trying to remain downwind of one's quarry.
I still wear camo occasionally, but I will heartily agree that I don't have to.
I'll stand with you, I only wore cammo for a while before going with the comfortable standys of jeans and a regular coat. Colorado requires enough 100 squares of blaze orange, so a solid blaze orange vest and hat are the only "hunting" specific clothes I go with.
In other words, forget the scent-bloc, the mossy oak, the real tree and hope the wind doesn't change direction and don't move even to scratch an itch. Because Dude, after 5 days in the same pants, you will want to scratch something.
While I will admit that wearing camo will never hurt you while hunting, I do believe it is a very overrated item in the deer hunting community. I hunt with a solid blaze orange suit during gun season and camo or normal work cloths during bow season. As far as I can tell the deer don't seem to act any differently or see me sooner when I'm wearing all blaze orange. I think as long as you are still and play the wind right, it doesn't matter what you wear.
For example, one night I was walking back from my stand through an open field during a full moon when I saw a couple deer coming my way. It was after shooting hours but I figured I'd watch them and see where they went. I stood perfectly still amd the darn things walked right past me at about 5 yards. I couldn't believe it, I was standing there with nothing around and a bright orange suit on. They could tell I was something but they didn't know I was alive until they passed me and I tried to move my head slightly to watch them leave. The second my head moved they were off like a shot. And these were heavily pressured deer too, not some tame game farm deer. From that moment on I haven't worried much about the clothing I wear, I think if you're good enough at staying still and quiet and only moving when the deer is looking away, it makes no difference what color or pattern you are wearing.
Yes, it is overrated, to a certain extent. Anybody see the movie "Shooter?" There's a deleted scene on the DVD where the main good guy, a former marine sniper, says, "Camoflage" is something you do, not something you wear." So, are the camo-colored clothes we think about useful for deer hunting?
They are if you think about it in terms of breaking up your man-shaped outline and blending in to the background so that you won't be perceived by the deer. But you can do that with almost any kind of clothing. I've seen black and white pictures of a guy wearing a Hawaiian shirt and he blended in quite well into a tree. So, with using camo to hunt deer, I believe it's the pattern, not the colors. Even a clown suit would work if you don't move. If you want "real" camo, you should wear a ghillie suit or tie grass, leaves, and twigs to your clothes. Otherwise, anything that blends in will work.
The old plaid jackets seem to have the ability to break up your outline and since deer are relatively colorblind, the color doesn't seem to be so important as contrast. Movement and taking advantage of cover, and being acutely aware of your background and light/shadows is more important than camo patterns. Ask any good recon man you run across.
OK,OK I realize that in your state that might be a trophy buck. Just keep in mind QDM works great. In Missouri and Kansas we pass on bucks that size many times every year. Last season my take was 4 antlerless deer for meat and herd culling. I Let at least a dozen bucks walk, some bigger than that one. Also watched a kid shoot his first deer which was more fun than shooting my own trophy. It was a 1.5 year old 7 pt and the kid was very proud. Next year he will be looking for an older deer.
Lot's of Kansas farmers wear Carharts. Just might give that a try next fall. BTW most of the time when hunting ducks, turkeys and bowhunting I wear the same old 3d suit over whatever. It works very well if I don't nove at the wrong time.
Right now I am testing the new Bushnell 2010 model trailcam and it looks like this will be a keeper. Will post some photos soon.
Oh, so deer can't see your profile? Really are you a deer? have you ever asked a deer? I didn't think so to either of the questions. Deer can most assuredly see a profile, have you ever had a mature buck just stare and stare and stare at you lowering his head and raising it back up trying to get you to move? He must be doing that because he is half blind and can's see a cotton picking thing! If it was my scent he would have been long gone, long before I ever came into sight. If you hunt on the ground a lot you will learn very quickly that deer can see profiles.
I think camo is important for bowhunters.
*wearing not reading - not sure where my mind was at
well i guess it cant hurt
I agree. As far as deer are concerned, camouflage IS overrated. I might add, I won't wear denim jeans either.
I don't wear camouflage; I usually wear dark wool (green or gray) trousers, red plaid wool shirts (Pendleton, Woolrich, etc.), an UnderArmour undershirt, maybe a vest, with a goose down or synthetic fiber overgarment, depending on ambient temperature. If regulations require wearing blaze orange, I'll wear it as a vest.
I don't disagree with those who choose to wear camouflage or criticize their choice; I simply don't think it's a decisive issue for deer because I haven't worn it when I've taken deer in the past. I don't think deer are swayed by the same advertisements and marketing efforts that influence us.
Having written that, I see camouflage as a sensible choice for ducks, geese and turkeys. But this opinion focuses on deer, and I agree with ENO.
I had one of the most productive years hunting on a working cattle farm, i wore carhartts just like the farmer and farm hands wore, the deer paid little attention to me.
I've certainly been on a walk in normal clothes, with my face and arms exposed (they are a little dark and hairy, but not camoflagued) and had deer look at me with no idea what I was all while in bow range. However considering most of my hunting is bow hunting and done from the ground and not in a blind, I'll take all the help I can get. Our fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers did nearly ruin hunting for us all without camoflage, however unlike most of us, if they didn't kill something they didn't eat (as much), they didn't have the same restrictions or seasons, they certainly didn't pass up a spike to wait for a bigger buck. This could account for a lot of their success.
I agree with you. I shoot deer every year with a blaze orange vest and hat. In every case, the deer knew exactly where I was and what was up.
I do in fact wear camo under the blaze orange, primarily because it hides the dirt, blood and the fact its the same pair of pants I had on five days ago.
Oh, and for those folks who say that you should have let that deer live a couple more years are full of crap. This is the real world. Not a game ranch in Texas with big fences. NICE DEER!
I myself beleive that camo is not really a must but very close. Yes, back then our gradfathers, or fathers hunted in plaid but deer were not as pressured. With easier to use gear, more and more people are getting into hunting. With more people, the deer probably learned that the human in the tree is not a good thing. Think of it this way, if you were being hunted but not knowing that you are a target and you see somthing that stands out, you may be curious and not very fearful. But after awhile you learn that the thing is out to kill you so everytime you see it now, you learn to run. The object of camo is to blend in. You would notice the original object if it didnt blend, but if you couldnt see it, whats there to fear? I think years ago camo wasnt as necessary. But now they are heavily pressured so it is necessary to blend in. Even in non pressured areas now camo may not be a must. But personally, I think camo is good. Just not for under pressured areas. Maybe i didnt go with the flow of the Shoot Me Down subject. But thats my argument about camo.
I disagree... here's why,
to start out with the least important reason for my disagreement on camo being overrated i'd say this, when i got on this post there were 70+ comments... about 10% disagreed with you... doesn't seem like that follows with what you were saying...
but the more important reason i disagree is this, most hunters who hunt now would agree that the sport is sadly dwindling in it's participants... Maybe not hugely yet, but it is! To start a change in that downward spiral we need to introduce more people to hunting, the majority will be youngsters (like myself lol) and most of you will agree that they won't be able to hold still well enough that regular clothes would hide them from the deer. Thus CAMO... although i believe that the pattern of the camo is not a huge thing, the fact that it breaks up the form is what's important! we need all the help we can get keeping kids in this sport since they are the future of it! So why not help them out as much as we can? Sure, someone who has the patience and self-control to keep still can fool lots of deer... but by the time you get the age and wisdom necessary to figure that out it's time to pass on the skills, and camo is gonna help! :)
So is camo overrated? It sounds like it is for ENO, i mean it would take a lot to have a yard sale with :P but i think it's not overrated if you look at the future of the sport and the part camo play's in it.
I definitely agree, all the die hard hunters I know that are over the age of 30 still wear green wool pants and blaze orange and they still kill big deer every year. It seems like that generation just missed out on all the advertising on tv telling them they need camo to kill deer...
I think camo is overrated however, it is better than a solid block of color. I don't hunt in jeans when I can avoid it as I find them too noisy in the brush. I have some lightweight camo pants for the warmer hunts and some old miltary (OD Green) wool pants for the cold stuff. I have hunted successfully in red plaid and orange plaid wool shirts/jackets with an average shot distance of under 100 yds. The plaid pattern breaks up o persons outline so they are less distiguishable to game. My personal theory is movement and smell will give you away quicker than sight. The solid block of color just draws the animal's eyes to you and amplifies any movment. Of course in the states that require a certain amount of blaze this solid block cannot be avoided. I do have a blaze vest and hat that I use where required.
Agreed....with a caveat.
It's not completely useless. The give away is CONTRAST, not color/pattern. You can wear some bright colors if your background is bright (see sky) or dark colors on the ground, but if you are wearing a a standard RealTree for example in a barren tree with bright, cloudy skies, a deer below you will see you everytime. Same pattern on the ground, you are probably ok.
I'll keep wearing my camo, washed in scentfree detergent and air dried. I bow hunt mostly and have been busted on stand just from blinking my eyes. I have many deer that walk under my stand, dont think that would happen if I didn't wear scentfree camo.
I believe that at least 95% of the camo clothing patterns sold today are designed to attract hunters and their wallets. Most are no more or less effective for firearms deer hunting than the plaid pattern of yesteryear, depending on the hunters behavior and use of cover.
That said, a number of years ago I had a doe not like what she was seeing while I was sitting absolutely still on a shooting stool wearing a ghillie suit during bow season. I was not taking advantage of any other cover, so here is this weird looking mound in her woods she didn't want to walk by. She didn't spook, but she stomped a bit and the group took a large enough detour so I didn't get a shot.
This past season, I had a large buck that I had called see me about 10 minutes before legal light. I was walking in to where I was going to hunt, and heard him thrashing the brush and chasing does so I tried to keep him around with a grunt call. I was wearing my firearms season clothing (orange vest, orange camo jacket) and a black watch cap because it was still basically dark. He came out from behind a tree about 40 yards away and looked right at me for half a second, and left rapidly. He didn't wind me and I didn't move, but I believe he recognized a human face and head as something he didn't want to stick around for.
I have had good success with my solid orange brimmed hat and solid orange vest over an orange camo coat, all in wool. I wear green wool pants but at times have wondered if I should try ghillie pants with my orange upper body clothing. The reason is I mostly still hunt on public land, and if you squat down to look in the woods, often you can see a lot further at waist and knee height than at human head height. There are always a few deer that spook that I don't see, and I believe they have seen my leg or foot move.
Effective camo to me is less about clothing and more use of cover, control of movement and noise. What camo is not to me is a fashion statement. My hunting clothes are not worn other than hunting.
It does help. Can you hunt and be successful without it - sure, for thousands of years they did. They also didn't use leupold optics, cartridges that can reach out there hundreds of yards, code blue estrous, grunt tubes, hand warmers, gore-tex, thinsulate, polypro, in-lines, (real men use match or wheel locks :o), or hornady light-magnums to eek out a little bit more performance from that favorite hunting round. All these things give you an edge.
I remember hunting in PA as a youngster, before I had the money for camo. I was sitting under a tree, jeans and a flannel shirt (like you ENO). I was half asleep and heard a twig snap, opened my eyes to see a little doe about 15 ft from me. Surprised the cr-p out of both of us... If I was wearing camo, maybe she'd a run me over!
fun "shoot me down" though!
I think that we wear the different camo patterns to make a fashion statement. After all we have to have the latest on the market, last years camo just won't do. You are completely out of style if your camo pattern is several years old. It's not what the deer see its what the hunters see. The only reason I wear some camo is because some of the better gore tex soft models only come in camo. I guess the finer clothing in solid colors just wouldn't sell so we will play the camo game. When we all get dressed on opening morning you can see everyone eyeing up everyone's new camo clothing.
For many years I hunted in plain khaki pants and shirt, with an orange vest as required by Mississippi law, I found that the terrain I hunted in, hills and hollows of hardwood, that khaki and orange were perfect camoflage during the muzzleloader season, (first 2 weeks of Dec).
What really mattered most was motion. Move only when you have to and are certain the deer is not looking toward you and all will be well.
100% agree so overrated i sit on the side on a hill with my rifle in brown not a bit of camo. I killed a 154 buck and im 14 and a 107 for my first buck the 107 at 50 yds the other at 140.
I think its overated in the rifle part. Just cause the shooting distance is greater an you dont really need camo when your shooting at 150+ yards.I could sit down along a hillside,creek bottom or fenceline in my every day clothes an wait for a shot at a deer that happens to wonder by. The same goes for walking if I play the wind right.Bow hunting is a whole different story im out in full camo I'll take every advantage of concealment i can.
Just think about all the deer that busted you for not breaking up your outline (somehow) and you never saw them at all! LOL
Camo is over done and maybe a little overrated, but I don't leave home without it! Go ahead and freeze your axx off in those cotton Levi's and Wrangler's!
Wearing camoflage for hunting deer is like wearing a marching band uniform for working in a mine. The deer don't care. It's movement that they care about and only particular kinds of movement. People who wear camo to hunt deer only demonstrate a kind of foolishness for which the reward of not being seen by other hunters is a higher risk of being shot, all for the sole purpose of making a fashion statement.
But hey. Someone has to keep Cabelas in business, so carry on all you Camofashionistas.
that's exactly what I was thinking Del, just try hunting turkey and ducks without full camo and you will be sorry. I use a full body leafy suit for turkeys. i even suit up for deer because I hunt almost all of my deer from the ground doing spot and stalk. I need as much help as I can get when I am on the same level as the deer.
First of all, great buck ENO and your picture is destined to become a family heirloom.
Second, Camo is overrated. I killed both of my deer last year with a long bow from the ground. Hunting from the ground and consistently being within a few feet of deer you learn quickly its movement and not camo that keeps you hidden.
My first bow kill was in 1981. I was wearing jeans and a plaid flannel shirt. When i shot my largest deer in 2006 I was wearing a solid green pullover and yellow fishing cap.
I no longer wear camo gloves or face mask. It's just a waste unless they are keeping you warm.
ENO,
Your last comment is freaking funny. Thanks for the laugh. I hope you don't mind if I steal it...
I agree 100%.
yrs-
Evan!
I'll agree with ya for deer. But I'll still camo it up. If not and a big buck seen me I know I'd be kicking myself for not wearing camo.
Ill stand with you. All thoose people think they need to buy fancy camo with scent locker and all that stuuf. WASTE OF MONEY!!! My buddy shot a 5.5 year old 11 point on state land sitting at the bottom of a tree with no camo on at all. The dear was also down wind. Shot was taken a 6 yards with a .308 win.
I believe all this hype about camo, scent control, and such is just another marketing gimmick. I hunt in comfortable "civilian" clothing and boots, wash my clothes normally and bath in my regular soap. I kill an average of 7 deer and at least 1 turkey, hogs, squirrels, and yotes every year.
Camo is a yuppie thing. a fashion statement.
JohnR- You probably should use more scent prevention if the "fowl" in your area are winding you.
Unless you can neutralize your breath, you are just pissing in the wind.
Ive said it 50 times, camo is unnecessary, we wore olive green ripstops in Nam and they wore black as long as we or they were still it was dificult to spot either. Tiger stripes and trying to look like salad or molting tree is silly and a waste of money.
He's right, it is a waste.
As he notes look at old photos and it's obvious.
Actually camo didn't become popular until circa 1980 when Rambo came out and even then it was more a pop culture fad.
Soon the hunting industry picked up the banner and began aggressive marketing campaigns for hunters. It has exploded since then, with all the various patterns the guy mentions. All of which are about as useful as designer, logo emblazoned clothes.
The basis of camo is to break up an outline, which is easily done by wearing a pattern. It doesn't have to be an exact match, pattern or color wise, to whatever the background you are in, just break up the outline. Especially for deer, which have poor eyesight. Even turkeys, who have excellent eyes do not need special patterns.
Then there is the whole domestication angle. Most wildlife, except that in very rural areas, are conditioned to seeing humans. So why the camo, except your a fad following tool or mucho macho moron?
when i shot my first buck ever a small spike i was wearing blue sweatpants and a blue sweatshirt with my blaze orange hat and sneakers on but i still wear the camo
We kids used to have a little sport where i grew up as a fisherman up on the north coast. when we had time and was working on the docks for some reason and a seagull was sitting on a post nearby it was a sport sneaking up close to it little by little when it looked away from u (meaning beak directly at u) and grabbing the bird with your hands. and we did this sucessfully in blaze orange or signal pink or in our any other colour coveralls with thick lining, stinking of everything we came in contact with from marine diesel oil to fishguts. camo didnt make any difference there or scent. only thing that mattered was standing perfectly still when observed and moving silently when advancing.
Nuff said!
well deer are color blind and you are right camo is over rated. I have killed plenty of deer wearing a green wool coat and pants in the hard woods with snow on the ground. some as close as twenty yards . you can fool their eyes with out much trouble , now their nose thats a different story.
I stand with you. I have a full scent blocker suit (underwear, base layers, the whole nine yards) that I bow hunt in. I gave that a shot the first two days of Illinois firearm season and between being frozen to the bone and seeing any deer anyway I opted for dirty jeans, a flannel shirt, and Carhartt bibs with plenty of blaze orange mind you. I got into the woods at about 11am and had four deer on the ground by the end of shooting hours. I stuffed several peoples' freezers and was comfortable doing it.
I'm actually pretty convinced that you can get away with minimal camo even for bowhunting deer, and with a rifle in hand, why even bother with camo? But I end up in camo pants because they tend to be the best design for bowhunting -- quiet material, pockets in the right places, tear-resistant.
With the trend towards blind-hunting for turkeys, camo isn't probably that vital there anymore, right?
Deer hunting yes its over rated, but we do have some smart deer where I hunt, so I'll take every advantage I can get.
I don't care what color you wear, so long as you don't require me to wear blaze orange.
I mostly hunt deer in red/black wool, but i won't be happy if my state makes an orange requirement other than public land.
Ok I have heard it all caught fish out of a mud puddle shot deer in my bath robe while eating a biscuit. I want to know why we would subject ourselves to such a broad general statement. In Georgia we have 90 days of rifle season if you count the muzzle loader season. Up north some states have 7 days of hunting season. Why the habitat in Georgia is thick as well you can get. To harvest a deer of any size you must get into his living room and if you are hunting on public land it is very difficult. We arent hunting the farm belt or the feeders or the baited fields we are hunting the thick georgia briars and pines and you better be quiet not stink and have your human silhouette unless you like tag soup!
I am more than a little suspicious here. It is called "Shoot Me Down" for a reason. It is against the grain, yet most of you agree? Don't get me wrong, every environment deserves an appropriate pattern but, my point is, camo is effective. How many of you that agree go hunting in clothes that are not primarily camouflage? "I have a truckload of camo but it is overrated."??? Makes no sense. I would have to say that according to the responses to this post, camo is far underrated.
Dann, the deer knew where you were and what was up? So they walked right into the shooting gallery? Suicidal deer? I doubt that. Also, camo does not hide dirt or the fact that you never do laundry.
Good topic i would prefer to wear black in some of my tree stand sets it would just break my outline up better. My opinion you can slack on camo if your in good spot or can really brush in your stands. I think i could hunt with dark clothing which i guess you could say is a form of camo. Deer un-pushed by hunter pressure basically bow hunting the deer do notice subtle changes in there habitat camo just helps have them not notice its a person.
Camo may be overrated, but at least wearing it doesnt hurt your chances.
All of the high tech. hunting gear today is over rated and over priced. You really don't need any of it to kill a deer. Just a gun and the knowledge of deer.
i dunnno but i like it any way i were it to school and i have a camo hat on right now realtree hardwoods to be exact!!
Hey del read the title "Camo is overrated for DEER" not turkeys
It has its times it is very important.
For deer you may be right..but for ducks, in heavily hunted areas, camo is a must..they can spot an eyeball at 300 yards....
I have pet ducks ( part of my live decoy program lol), They can spot a jet at 30,000 feet out of their peripheral vision....you can bet they can see your face and jeans and anything that doesn't blend in to the surroundings....
I stand with you but Its deffinitly necesary for bowhunting and turkey hunting.
Like stated earlier, its all about breaking up your silhouette. Sure if you have some braches or a bush near you doing that for you, you don't necessarily need camo. Camo can do that in more situations than solid or straight line patterns. So, in the long run you would be wise to use camo.
I stand by my statement: Camo isn't overated. It is a very effective tool to have with you and in your arsenal.
And yes, i have also walked up on unsuspecting deer who didn't see me. It was about 15 yards away. But I think i could've been wearing anything or even naked, but that deer wouldn't have seen me. Its mind was somewhere else. It was a very young deer, a button-buck to be specific, and it was too oblivious to its surrounding. It had nothing to do with the hunters in this situation.
But yes, I did happen to be wearing camo.
I will agree. No amount of camo can fully conceal movement. It does help, but I would say is not a necessity.
I was able to walk up to 30 yards in the open on a 4x4 Mule Deer during Javelina Season in Arizona with Blaze Orange coat, pants and hat.
Camo really isn't necessary for deer hunting my dad has never worn cammo deer hunting. I like camo so I ware it any way, but i have never spent any money on camo. Mine is mostly old BDUs that my dad gave me when the Army switched to ACUs and he had no use for the BDUs anymore.
However varmint and Turkey hunting are another story. I plan on buying a gillie suit before next turkey season.
Oh and what Mike P. said about the cammo hat applies to me too. I realize that the cammo has little practical use but everybody knows what you think about guns, hunting, etc. when you're wearing a cammo hat with a deer head silhouette on it.
I think Scent Concealment is more important than camo, even though I think Scent-Lok doesn't work as advertised either. Keep your clothes in a air-tight box or bag and off you when not in the stand and you've got no scent. Motion control is probably the biggest downfall of any hunter. You've got to be still or all you'll see are whitetails pouncing off.
www.outdoorwriter.net
I guess I'll shoot you down. Cammo is great for breaking up your silhouette and hiding movement. but what is camouflage? If you are siting in the corner of a field taking 75 plus yard shots then you are camouflaged by distance. If your in a blind or up against a tree or a rock then you are camoflaged by your surroundings. that deer you shot was young and maby distracted by the rut.
Deer who see farm workers in work clothes all year long get use to seeing them. So during hunting season they don't see them as a threat until it's too late.
I think you can make an agruement either way you cut this. In the end, is camo a requirement to hunt successfully, no. With that said, has camo become the "uniform" for the modern hunter, yes.
heres a man who killed a young nieve 2 1/2 year old buck with a rifle,theres no tellin how far he was when he took the shot,this doesnt really tell us very much does it??bottom line is if your hunt requires u to get within 60 yards then camo is a must.camo is all about blending in to your surroundings.we r not 100 percent sure that deer r colour blind,but a red flannel shirt doesnt look like a tree and branches regardless.
to me it’s something that adds the fun ,it makes me feel like i’m a spy or a soldier.Using my camo to hide from my enemy.but I did shoot my deer in nothing but a pair of jeans boots and a blue sweater.
I guess you can look like the Great Pumpkin and still sneak up on a deer! LOL
Camo is overrated but nice to have
Camo is overrated but nice to have
well i am with Del from kansas, your buck was a very young imature deer that wasn't very wise to hunting pressure but you give him 2-3 more years in the woods and you'll never get to within 100yds of the same deer. Yes there arre times when camo isn't a must but if your trophy hunting the big boys then better wash your clothes and weear the camo.
I think you have totally misunderstood the reason for and use of camo.
It's similar to bike riders wearing tight racing clothes when out for a leasurely Sunday pedal around the neighborhood. We not only do sports we wear the clothes of the sport to tell everyone that we are a part of the sport.
Somewhere I'd like to see a comparison of the yearly profit from hunting clothes, versus the profit off guns and ammo.
heck i stalk within 10 yards of turkeys in jeans and a tee shirt all the time. camo is nice, and is certainly an advantage but it is not neccessary
I agree. You don't always need camo. My friend shot a 12 point buck wearing a blue t-shirt.
I think clothes are overrated period. I am going all natural.
I can’t help but find it amusing that people talk about how back in the day people wore flannel jackets and not camouflage. Just because it’s not real tree does not mean it’s not camouflage. Camouflage dose help with deer hunting it breaks up your outline so the deer don’t recognize what you are. It was made to help you blend in with your surroundings, not to make you invisible.
Deer can easily pick out an outline Diehl, you need something to break up your profile, especially if you hunt deer no the ground. Listening to all these people you would think that deer are half blind and stupid.
camo is the best
Post a Comment