


June 21, 2010
Petzal: Were Hunters in the 1920s Tougher than We Are?
This past week, I came into possession of half a dozen copies of Field & Stream from the early 1920s. Reading them, you can’t help but be struck how little things have changed, and how much (the price of an issue was 25 cents.) What does leap out at you, though, is that hunters then were a hell of a lot tougher than we are.
When they went big-game hunting, they expected to be wet and cold. If you were warm and dry at the end of the day it was because you had spent your time in the cabin playing cards. But there was more than that.
If you got into trouble in the outdoors back then, you were on your own in a way we can’t imagine today. No GPS. No satellite phone. No search and rescue efforts by air. Unless you were extremely lucky and/or provident, no one would even know you were missing until it was way too late. When Townsend Whelen hunted in British Columbia in the early part of the 20th century, there were not even maps of some of the places he went.
This took a brand of resolve that’s not required of us today. The only place I know where you can still go and get into plenty of trouble, even with modern gadgetry, is Alaska. It’s so big and so wild that it can still swallow people without a trace.
Comments (82)
The toughest men to ever walk the earth have long come and gone. They were tougher in the field as well as everywhere else. They went through harder times and complained less. However, they would have jumped at the opportunity to enjoy gore-tex, leopold, sub moa rifles and many of our other modern conveniences.
huntnow -
While I agree with your assessment that the toughest have come and gone, I am going to have to disagree with their willingness to accept the comforts we have. Almost without exception, all of the WWII generation I have encountered are gruff (at least on the exterior) and proud of the way they did it back then. I can only imagine how those who have passed would have viewed technology and advancements...most likely with disdain.
Is a pigs tuchas pork?
One great example is what passed for a hunting camp decades ago. Look for old photos, logs stacked into a shack no bigger than an outhouse, simply in a cave or under a large rock, cinderblock buildings with no bunks or stove. A lot of camps nowadays are elaborate tent set ups or family cabins...not what was a snakes den earlier in the summer!
DEP, I agree wholeheartedly. In Mr. Whelen's time, it was a bare bones hunt with a pack mule, if lucky. My last hunt, on our down time, was spent watching a NFL game via the Sat Dish on the roof of the Pop-out travel trailer! I mean, we "roughed it."
I dunno.
I guess it would be correct to say that more gear is available today that makes it much easier and more comfortable for those who can afford it.
But it is not difficult to find people in less-populated areas and less-moneyed circumstances whose means of hunting has changed little since the end of WWI.
There are still some of those strong hard seasoned veterans out there, but the kids coming up these days and even some of us are spoiled with our comforts. No changing back though.
Is this the real Uncle Ted?
You may be right auburn hunter, many of those of the Greatest Generation may be set in their ways and turn their noses up a our amenities. However, both of my grandfathers served in WWII and the first chance they had at a pair of boots that kept their feet dry and optics that enabled more accurate long distance shooting, they took full advantage of them.
I don't know if the early frontiersmen were tougher than we are, but one thing that does stand out, is their resourcefulness;The ability to deal skillfully and promptly with new situations,difficulties and their relentless pursuit and exploration of a better life on the land they loved.
If they went huntin' in the rain, it certainly wasn't for pleasure, but for sustenance and survival. They knew the intricacies of fire starting in all types of weather conditions, life depended upon it. The axiom, "survivor of the fittest," certainly pertain to these hunters.
And therein, is the difference of the modern day hunter, versus the frontiersman of not so long ago, as history is measured.
Men back then, for the most part were never lost,they lived in the woods,were acquainted and prepared, or knew the lay of the land. They were much more intimate,not to mention wood and water wise.
They didn't have to worry about the distractions and obstacles as the modern day hunter does; such as, GPS's going dead for lack of power, text messages while in the woods that say,"honey on your way home, pick up some diapers," time constraints ... the list goes on!
I'm sure readers could comment more on modern day distractions found in the woods today.
A lot of modern day hunters, just as hunters of yesterday, still to some degree resist, the new fangled conveniences that are offered today. Once they become aquainted, realization trumps resistance.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with being comfortable in the wild. Heck, I once ran out of Skoal on a Northern Manitoba bear hunt and they flew a can in just for me. Dang that was a tough couple hours.
I would say absolutely!
I would add, that hunters at the turn of the century were outdoors men first, hunters second,...now I believe that the situation is reversed....most of us new to hunting are shooters first, then hunters,...and lastly outdoors men.
I grew up in the City, had just enough scouting experience to whet my appetite for the outdoors, but I in no way consider myself and outdoorsman.
I say that because if you were to drop me off in the middle of 2 square miles of thick woods, I might not make it out...and although I gain more confidence with each journey into and safely back out of the woods, I still get uncomfortable in the woods especially in the dark,...the old timers were not only at home in the woods, but very adept at finding game in the woods.
I think many hunters now are field or plot hunters, maybe a few get back onto a draw or oak ridge but few simply head out in search of game,...those that do, I admire a good deal.
Every generation gets a little softer. My Dad is a Vietnam-era guy (he was at Ia Drang in '65) and he's tougher than me. His dad was even tougher than him. My kids and their generation are shaping up to be softer than the country kids we were. I shudder to think how soft my great grandkids will be.
Tough guys are alive and well. The Army Rangers, Special Forces, Navy Seals, etc are full of them. The toughest man I ever met was an Airborne Ranger, SF instructor and member of Delta Force. He was also a survivor of jimmy carter's (no caps for him) failed Iran rescue mission but that is another story.
As for me I grew up hunting for food and fun in that order. Have never used a GPS and don't plan to anytime soon. Learn what a map and compass is for and you will never be lost because the battery went dead. No,I do not consider myself as tough as some of those guys.
The old timers did what they did because they had no other choice.
You might be right Dave. Inspired by previous posts, I looked at my old Jack O'Connor books. The photos revealed no camo, rifles with wood stocks and in general clothing that looked like it came from the "working man" section of Sears.
You might be wrong Dave. I hunted with my son shortly after he returned from a USMC sponsored field trip in Falujah. It was cold, wet and miserable but he coped better than the rest of us.
You might be right Dave. Inspired by previous posts, I looked at my old Jack O'Connor books. Photos revealed clothing that looks like it came from the "working man's section" at Sears.
You might be wrong Dave. I hunted with my son shortly after he returned from a USMC field trip to Falujah. It was wet, cold and miserable but he coped bettern than the "old timers" on the trip.
Ya know, I was just reading some more O'Connor this weekend and it never fails to amaze me. The things they did in the places they went. Their stories are as amazing as any I've read or heard. There are some today who dare not venture down the manicured trailhead without a GPS and a cell-phone. Almost embarrassing to watch isn't it. I hope to be half the man, those old-timers were one day. Alaska anyone?
There still are plenty of tough guys out there, but most hunters certainly are not. I include myself these days in the latter lot. When I was in my 20s I once backpacked 45 miles in two days while carrying a 40-pound pack. I could walk all day in any sort of terrain until I got to be about 50. Now, at age 61 with arthritis and an artificial knee and hip, I do well to hobble around the block.
Speaking of the tough guys of previous generations, I remember reading in one of Teddy Roosevelt's books about him hunting mountain goats somewhere out west. He left camp on foot for several days with, as I remember, a packet of salt and some bread. His choice of diet still puzzles me, and I probably would have starved on those rations within two days. But Roosevelt didn't seem to pay it a second thought.
When I lived in Great Falls, MT my next door neighbor was an Air Force reserve colonel and a jet fighter pilot. He used to like to say to his young pilots, "You think you are tough?" Then he would tell them about the members of the Lewis & Clark Expedition, pulling boats up the Missouri River against the current, clad in mocassins and other substandard clothing, and living under primitive conditions that none of them could imagine.
A few years ago I read a wonderful book, the name of which escapes me, about party of explorers who went to Anarctica around the time of World War I. They got ice-bound, had to set out in rowboats, were gone a couple years. (Someone please help me out with the title!) It is a story of adventure, hardship, survival and toughness that left me in a state of awe.
Wanna see tough guys? Watch the U.S. Army Ranger "Best Ranger " competition and tell me all the tough guys are gone! Ha!
http://www.bestrangercompetition.com/
Not related to hunters but the guys on deadliest catch, now there are some tough customers!
My father was in his teens in the 20's when he started hunting in ME. and NH. He was a product of THE GREAT DEPRESSION and was happy to have anything that worked. As Del in KS stated about himself, my dad also hunted for food first and for sport later. But, thats how he learned.
I knew some very brave and tough guys when I servrd. Many died young, as it is now. I don't know or really care if my father was tougher than I am. All I know is that the whitetails he bragged about killing were a lot bigger than any I've ever seen.
All kinds of tough guys out there,. now and before,..
if you look at cloths boots tools guns and knives from then
They didnt have near as good as we do now .
But actually not bad .
Still ,.anyone know of a cordless hammer drill from 1919.?
Anyone know of an air nailer from that time
No ,,. because it didnt exist.
One MOA acuuracy ?? : ) . they didnt know what that was or care . 3 inches at 100 yds was a tac driver : )
30-06 30-40s 30-30 45 -70 etc etc did the job .
Howevr ,. ( would venture) most of the hunters living in the squirrl shacks or old loggers barracks or tents ,. were not big shots from Chcicago New york or Philly ,.
They were mostly farmers ,or in some capacity, men of the land.
They had learned youg what to do to stay warm (mostly ) out side all day ,. they got up at 4am and went to bed when the light faded ,.
I never knew a guy my garndfathers age who was fat because no matter how much he ate it was burned off from activity IE: Work .
They were also used to less and the made due
And they were also many times dead at 60 +/-.
So is dead at 60 tuff or just worn out,.
I submit to you the latter .
Today we live longer becausse we know more science, and medicine, we eat better,. sleep better and are more comfortable. Yup thats right comforatble .
IE; not constantly feezing your A$$ off.
I never ran into a smart guy who practiced being wet cold and misserable, because thats just stupid .
But I have known guys who will brave ugly conditions to hunt
Also knew a guy my grand fathers age who always carried 1/2 an army pup tent. Just in case it rained or snowed like hell. To him it mant more time in the woods,.. Becase even thick wool coats wouldnt shed weater like a pice of tent canvas,.
Plus they knew back then it took time to hunt,,. no cell phones no inetrnet to telephones
They went hunting for days or weeks at a a time ,.. promarily for food the sport was second ,.
but he comarodrie ( sp ? ) was unavoidable.
.
I spent three days once,. in a pine bow liento,( sp ?) . it snowed,. it raned,. and it was foggy and then it turned colder that all billy hell.
I was mostly dry becusse the old guy running that show knew enough to get ready for bad weathet ,so we took no real hurt because we had a fire going constantly,.
The old guy actually shot a fat 6 pt buck from his place by the fire when it was raining.
He enever quit watching
Tougher ,.nah,. better shape sure ( from working ) but better able to survive due to wood craft they knew from the time they were ten.
Before I get to far down the trail would like to do that leinto thing again ,.. That reaay was something.
Tougher?? ,. I doubt
Better shape and ,. better prepared? ,. probably.
I do think the 1920-30's hunters were tougher then the average hunter of today, but not by choice. Sure, life was tougher for everybody back then,in fact, I bet most of the US population farmed for a living, or at least grew food and raised animals just to survive. Farming was THE main industry back then, so being "soft" definately was a priviledge of the rich.
Hunting was a true act of survival and not necessarily enjoyment!
the generations before us were definitly tougher than we are today. i don't mean technology but the simple persistance and tolerance of poor conditions (be they in the field or in camp). hell, kids today don't even go out and play in the yard, instead they rot on video games and have a fraction of the outdoors exposure the generations before. at my place of employ we call it the continued pussification of america.
Damn right they were tougher. May be hard to admit guys but why? Our forefathers did everything with their brawn sweat and muscles. No google, gps or cell phones to help find an easy way to do it. They were one tough MoFo generation. JMO jim
Humans do what we have to do with what we have. I don't think people were any tougher back then. I think they were tougher minded, though. Running water, flushing toilets, gas heat, and medical treatment were luxuries to many. And bug repellent? We have it and like it but we would do without if we had to.
Knowledge is the other thing. Going out for a few days or weeks or even months at a time seems to have been normal. They knew what they had to do to get by. Now if someone returns from being dislocated for more than a day or two we call them survivors.
Perhaps it is just the mentality. Unfortunately, survival is more print worthy than outdoorsmanship.
I'm not sure if they were tougher than we are, but they were certainly better woodsmen than we are. They went afield with only a compass,a map in their head and the sun and stars to navigate with in woods with far fewer roads, and two tracks and RV trails than today. I had the privlege to grow up deer hunting with a few of these fellas. One in particular would get up before everyone else, cook breakfast for everyone, and get dressed and be gone into the morning moonlight before anyone had started eating breakfast. When everyone else finaly got ready they would pile in a pickup and drive down the road 5 miles and then up a old two track another 2.5 miles and find this fella waiting at the end of the two track, sitting on a stump smoking a cigarette after he had walked cross lots 6 miles in the dark with no flashlight. I always wondered what possessed a 60 year old man to do something like that on a daily basis. I think he was setting the bar for the younger ones.
Dave,
Yes, there are great young men (and women) today that are damn tough. Yes, there are more who are not.
You cannot be tough without a drive and a reason, which can be military, family history, personal drive and where you choose to live. I have lived in AK for over 50 years and the number of tough are now mostly out of any metropolitan area and/or other area with cable tv. With SAT phones and all it is getting harder to even get away in AK. 911 calls inundate the cell phone range coverage for someone to come pick me up - I am cold and hungry or just tired.
As Professional Hunter and Outfitter for most of those 50+ years here in AK I now see more and more of the world turning to 5* Lodges with 'introduced' specie or fenced areas with special feed and gene pools, etc. Look at the SCI record books to see how they have been accommodated to recognize the prowess of hunting comfortably.
On this subject you could add another recommended reading list of books that cover some of the older days - I recommend a few, below, and having had the pleasure of visiting the book room at Campfire Club, briefly, I could have camped there for days just reading some I had never seen.
1. Hunting the Alaska Brown Bear - Eddy
2. Alaska Yukon Trophies Won and Lost - Young
3. Hunting in the Arctic and Alaska - Skull
4. From Out of the Yukon - James Bond
Please add some of the others you know better than I.
my uncle (ex101st airborne dels right they are resilient) turned me onto an idea a couple of years ago he grew up in the city but every summer from when he was 13 on til he left for the army he would hike several miles away to a wildlife area (one time about 60miles from home ) and set up his own camp and live off the land. never brought more than what he could carry on his back no tent a tarp most of the time. he spent every waking moment in the woods, He usually told my grandma where he was going roughly and went. He has some great stories and can cook and fish with plants i never would of figured out were edible. its kind of like the movie into to wild but my uncle had a better book apparently. My uncles only 45 but i would imagine thats what many of the the 1920 era would do regularly if they were outdoorsman.
i don't really consider myself close to as tough or resilient as many of my forefathers . so yes they were better especially without the modern day equipment.
I think I could survive with a .22 pistol, ammo and appropriate attire just about anywhere as long as there is water.
The answer is obvious. The real question is whether the old timers are rolling over in their graves or just plain laughing at us.
I don't want to be "tough" no more! Enough sleeping in the rain and mud, cold and wind to do me a lifetime. No thanks, but I got enough practice in 7 1/2 years in the Army! LOL
Tell me who the tough guys are and I'll send them a postcard.
I don't know how tough hunters and outdoorsmen were in the 1920's but I do know that I was a _ell of a lot tougher myself about 30-40 years ago when I could not afford good equipment. Hunted in cotton long johns, blue jeans and a old navy pea coat, no map, only a compass, knife, matches, gun and a little bit of ammo that had to suffice. We would go fishing on a river, had an old aluminum boat, no motor, we would walk the bank towing the boat on a rope till we got to where we wanted to camp and fish. Only took some lard and meal, if we wanted to eat, we had to catch fish. One evening after a heavy rain, we set up camp on a sandbar that was swept clean by the rain, laid out a old tarp, went to sleep, the next morning we saw where a very large aligator had crossed the sandbar within feet of where we were sleeping, no one suggested we move camp or go home.
I know some pretty tough birds who still hunt the back north woods. They go in at grey dawn and come out tommorrow some time. These are men in their 60's carrying pump remmingtons.
They carry simple gear, just like the old timers.
Alas I am not one of them. I like sitting on ambush with my 6.5x55!
One thing that I think has not changed is the way that we pick our partners when heading to the outdoors. It doesn't matter if it hunting, fishing, rafting or hiking we all want someone with us who is reliable, trustworthy and able.
The luxury of modern equipment has, without a doubt, made us softer than the men who walked before us. But when push comes to shove, none of us want someone with us who is going to just quit!
Tough guys (and gals) are to be admired, and some are even made into minor legends. As we get older, it is hard to be as tough as when we were younger. Do what you are able to do without getting crazy about it just to prove you are "one of the tough", and enjoy the hunt.
I would agree with WA Mtnhunter,...I've got a buddy who(along with his partner) won "best Ranger" a few years back, one tough son of a gun, but to see him in civies you'd never know it, slight of build, mild mannered gentleman,...two tours in Afghanistan, and dropped into Baghdad airfield,...but back to hunters,...if you haven't read them, I'd suggest reading Teddy's Roosevelt hunter trilogy, those conditions were a bit more difficult than today's conditions,...ever run into an shoshone war party?
We all can choose to bring that toughness back! We are bigger, stronger and have more knowledge at our very fingertips than any man in the 1920s. It remains our CHOICE to be soft. Our CHOICE to stay on the couch. We must choose to NOT be soft or stay on that Godforsaken couch. We must only look backward to gain knowledge from our fathers and grandfathers or remember their time with us, but to remain there is to become stagnant. We must pick ourselves up and make it happen! Get back in the gym, walk an extra quarter or half mile, choose to scout an extra day this year...don't let yourself get caught up in being soft. It's up to us. Paul's expression of "straining ever forward" means a great deal even today.
I've read Whelan's account of his British Columbia trip.
How many people today would know how to use a compass?
I don't know if they were tougher than some people today; military special forces units are some damn tough people, but yesterday's hunters were definitely more adventurous and self sufficient than we are today. If I had to sleep on the ground on a hunting trip, I would hope my hunting buddy would be a chiropractor.
YUK YUK
WA Mtn hunter
Made me laugh IE:( lOl ) and with the f ing weather were having in upper midwest thats a +1 for you
Like an episode of Scienfeld ( sp? )
"But I dont wanna be a pirate." YUK YUK
If tough means suffering I dont wanna be tough.
Or a G d Pirate : ) either.
To me the difference is smart or not smart .
Two different guys can go into the same circumstance. One will suffer and oe will not or at least a lot less.
You might call smart prepaired too ,. but the less suffering you do (usually) the better time you have and the more likley you are to do it again .
Or you figure out smart,. so you dont suffer the next time.
Tough is really a relative term ,.. am I toug enough to enhdure child birth < I wwoud have to say definitly NOT.
Am I as tough as Chineese a soldier in korea ,..armed with club or nothing ,.and no shes in the Korean winter,. charging American lines ,. nope I am not ,.
But Im not crazy either.
were they tuffer than us today? ABSOLOUTLY! was it by choice? NO! they took the state of the art technology with them just like we do today. just our technology is way advanced from what they had. just like their technology was way further ahead of 1830 technology. think about it from 1830 persons point of veiw. those 1920 hunters had repeating rifles, that shot self contained cartridges. with something called smokeless powder! they had specialized gear for hunting, with state of the art camoflage (which would have been red and black plaid wool). most of them carried compasses (the 1920's version of gps). they had worked out a distress call (3 shots in rapid secsession) to signal for help, in 1920, the crafty hunters were sitting in a tree looking down on critters from their recent idea of a homemade tree stand made from nailing a few 2"x12" peices of wood in the crotch of a tree with 2x4 steps nailed to the side of the tree. the really crafty guys, would have nailed a peice of canvas over their heads to stay dry in the rain. then, there was the outrageous spectacle of binoculars, instead of the old "spyglass" that would have been very rare indeed in the field in 1830. lets face it, we are men. and we are going to take advantage of every peice of technology we can in order to advance us in whatever we do. whether it is hunting, or traveling through space. in 2100, if there is still an america, if there is still hunting, they will probably using some kind of self guided mini-missles powered by an electromagnetic field. "field dressing will be an outrageous grossity that will no longer be nessesary. some sort of electronic device will do all of the gooey work for them. or, they might just order up a venison steak from their "local" electronic deli, becasue hunting will have been outlawed. if that is the case, i am glad i am living in the "cave man barbarian days" where people actually killed things.
You can run with this debate back 2,000 years to the ice man who had the DNA of 4 different men on his flint knife, and carried bush craft goods and clothes made out of hide with fur. Speaking for the generation interconnect I can say we are pussies who phone the AC repairman when it gets hotter than 72 in the house, and when my toes get cold its time to "scout" for bedded dear. Regardless of conditions their are a few things we can do to regain some resemblance to previous men. Not complain, but problem solve. Build a fire without a match for the challenge. Fully process our own deer/fish/game. Build stairs on tower stands for very young and very old. Insist on a wood burning stove. Fish from a canoe, sleep in a tent, and take care not to injure back, fingers, etc when working. Walk more and ride less. These are a few tips on how modern girly- men can protect a few traits of the previousily tougher self.
One very good book: "Grizzlies Don't Come Easy! My life as an Alaskan bear hunter" by Ralph W. Young.
He guided famous hunters like Jack O'Conner and Warren Page. Forward by Peter Barrett of Field & Stream.
Silvertip
In a word, "Wool". Lotsa wool.Once you get past the itch it's the warmest natural fiber. An example is wool socks will keep you warm in the winter and cool in the summer.
I agree they were tougher or at least tried and tested in ways many of us will never experience. I disagree that we're spoiled today. I'm not spoiled. I have collected and discarded my gear through trial and error andI greatly appreciate my gear and completely understand the level of comfort and protection it provides me. Thank you modern materials if not modern gadgets.
They simply made do with what they had. Dave I bet you saw alot of Savage 99's and Winchesters and Marlins in those articles because that's all thay had. In those days a peep sight was considered state of the art optics!
There are still tough people out there and you don't have to be an Airborn Ranger to be one. It's all state of mind. If you love to hunt you'll hunt cold and you'll hunt hungry. I know a bunch of fellows who back in November kept pushing Buffalo Grass for one more Rooster in cold driving sleet and rain pushed by a pretty stiff wind. At the end of the day all were cold, wet and tired, but they slep well that night. Know what? They got up and did it again the next day!
Many years ago, while in college and on the way home on break from Penn State, I stopped to pick out an Angus bull at Gilbert Watts' farm on Rt 220 west of Altoona. We looked at some likely bulls, and then headed to his farm office to look at the herd book. While he was leafing through the book (he was in his upper 70's or so then, back in 1978), I gawked at the very fine 9-pt mounted above his desk, "That's a nice one, Mr. Watts." "Yep", he said. Pointing to the mountains across the highway he added, "I got him three valleys beyond that pass." After we talked about deer for a bit he summed up with, "My grandad was the one. He never thought much of a man if he couldn't stick it out all day on stand if it was above freezing." Gilbert Watts was a great guy, and he had good bulls.
In Alaska, I always told new comers the 22 pistol and a good pair of running boots is the ultimate bear protection. Simply put, when the bear charges you shoot your buddy in the ankle and run like hell!
All jokes aside, years ago it was mind over body!
You can take 3 individuals, a person who mastered triathlon, the most book smart person you can find and a kid. Toss them in an environment lets say the arctic, which one is most like to survive?
The kid is the most likely to survive for one reason, the will to survive!
If I remember right I think it was 88 if not 89, an Alaska Bush Pilot committed suicide and the note read, mosquito are hitting the windshield etc can't handle it. Shortly after the pilot ended his life, a rescue chopper arrived!
One thing I've learned in Alaska, when you think your all alone, somebody is watching from afar, Alaska "THE LAND OF OPTICS"!!
I challenge anyone to remain as still as my Grandson Alex even when he was age 8! I tell'ya, at times I think this Young Man is asleep at times! He knows His Sport and truly loves the great outdoors!
People are as tough as will and need requires. Most folks are soft because they don't need to be tough and they have never developed the sense of will and drive that would impell them to strengthen themselves. However adversity both teaches and weeds the garden. Those who face adversity toughen or fall. I know many people who are "weak sticks" that can't be relied upon because they break under pressure. If you want to know someone's quality, go do something arduous and difficult with them, something that drives you both to your limits, and then you'll know if you can rely on them or if they grouse and fade.
WA Mtnhunter...send a post card to:
United States Army, 10th Mountain Division, Helmand Province, Afghanistan. I'm sure the men who wear the crossed swords shoulder patch would take a break from Burning The Taliban and reply.
Give them 2 weeks, I know you'll hear from them.
My Granddaddy hunted in the 30's, and he was a tough sob, but he wasn't stupid. He upgraded his gear eventually over the years. Granted, it was slowly, as he was as stubborn as a mule. But, as old boots and coats wore out, new 'improved' ones were bought. Now, when something worked, he stuck w/it religously, as is the case w/his pre-64 Mod.70, which he used exclusively for 50 years, then thankfully gave to me. I've got all the gear and gadgets, but that old .270 flat out works, so it's what I'll be carrying in the deer woods for many seasons to come. But yeah, he was tougher than I.
The clothing and gear I rely upon today is much better, much more efficient, than the stuff I used in the '60s. I can't make a comparison to the '20s (before my time) but I wouldn't step back in time to the coats and trousers I used years ago!
I'm sure those who could afford it in the 1920s used the best available, and that hasn't changed a bit. I admire my grandfather's tenacity and work ethic, rest his soul, but I'm grateful my world is different, presumably better, and I'm grateful for the progress.
Those who pine for the "good old days" or comment that "They don't make 'em like they used to" should take a moment to reconsider. There are rifles that were expensive to produce and are no longer in production. Yes, I mourn for a few of them. However, there are fabrics and outdoor clothing now that makes the "old days" seem primitive by comparison, and I'd be a hypocrite to say I'd trade any of it for what hung in my closet forty years ago!
hey 2poppa, long time since I've heard from you on hear, how you been? I find myself going back and looking at my grandpa's magazines from the 50's and tend to notice that even at that time people depended more on there instincts and guts then anything modern or new, and you could still by a purebred coon hound for 50 dollars.
I have to remember stories of "Black Pete" so named because smoke from his kerosene cook stove had him pretty much blackened up by Spring, when he came out to sell furs and buy "commodities and possibles". About 7 miles to the nearest gravel road and about the same milage to town.He took his twice yearly bath after he got back to camp (small shack, about 12 by 16 ). One bath in the spring, after ice out and one in the fall before ice up. He wore 3 layers of clothes that he rotated, inside layer to outside about every week, simply wore them out and then replaced them with a new layer, long johns (not part of the three) got changed twice a year.
He died in the Spring, caught in a late snow storm on his way to buy his spring supplies.
Friends found that he had amputated his own leg during the winter carved his own crutch and continued trapping and doing his thing until that Spring storm caught him half way to town.
Anybody that tough?
I watched the Natives in Alaska continually put there hands in freezing water, didn't bother them a bit but froze my hands in seconds!
He wasn't sure folks were tougher, but for darn sure times were a lot tougher. This was the response to a similar question by me to an old time hunter back around 19 and 47. I was eight or so, and sitting around a campfire with four or five scruffy, old hunters trying to dry out while hunting mule deer. They all qualified for 1920's hunters. The one speaking said he wasn't so tough, he had been turned down by the Army in WWI because he had flat feet. Of course he was still hunting mean country in his 70's and walked everywhere as he never learned to drive. Hunting in the West you often must cover a lot of miles. In fact, three of the five had never learned to drive.
These were all some of the best hunters I have ever known, and believe me, I have known some real great ones over the past 60 years hunting. No one had rain coats, heavy jackets, waterproof shoes, gloves, or any commercial hunting gear. Even their knives were what they used every day or came from their kitchen. No one owned a sleeping bag, just made do with an old blanket. Anything more would have made hunting uneconomical. The purpose was meat and a chance to spend time with friends. As I recall, the firearms included a 25-35, two 30-30s, a 35 Remington semi auto which always jammed after the first shot, and a battered Enfield 06 military stock. All were second or third hand. They always got venison, if it took all season.
If they got cold, wet, or tired, the rule was get out of the wind and build a fire. If you got discouraged or confused, build a fire. Someone would show up to the smoke, hopefully with a bottle.
I sure miss those folks and those days.
If you got cold, tired or, wet, the rule was get out of the wind and build a fire.
Beekeeper, Do I know those pheasant hunters? Not sure about tough on that one. Maybe too dumb to quit, ha,ha. We did bag a limit of roosters and had great fun doing it. You sir are welcome to come back to deer, duck, pheasant or turkey hunt if you wish. Remember all the ducks we saw. Next time we will take some decoys and wadders just in case.
My older brother is one of the toughest men I have ever known. As a kid I remember watching as he climbed a tall Florida longleaf pine and punched a large boar coon off his limb. It was at least 30 feet to the first limb. If you ever tried to climb one of those you know what I am talking about. At age 52 he got Emphysema (spelling?) and 2 other serious ailments. We did not think he would live another 5 years. Today he is 75, still runs a pack of fox hounds and spends much time in the Fla swamps. Somehow he always found time to hunt (at night) while working 12 hrs a day 6 days a week in heavy equipment construction. He raised 7 children on chicken feed wages. The man would have made a great soldier.
BTW my brother did quit smoking.
Del,
Sometimes lack of intelligence has a lot to do with it!
Oh, the Sourwood trees are blooming and the bees are up there on the Blueridge working. Keep your fingers crossed!
Hot damn!!!! Sourwood is my favorite honey!!!! Dang it Bee now I'm drooling all over the keyboard thinking about biscuits and Sourwood honey.
i would agree with the fact that previous generations were "tougher" in a way, outdoorsmen or not, though realistically they were that way because they had to be. Although there are plenty of old guys out there who still prefer to go about it that way, and some who have embraced modern tech, the ones who dont i would guess do it more so because its been engrained in them to do so through years of making things work the tough way, had they grown up with our technology i am quite confident they for the most part would be no "tougher" than us. with that being said i am going to do things the way they have been done for countless years and use the best technology available to me. And an aside on toughness, i am not quite convinced we are that much less tough than they were, if forced into situations were we were required to be as tough as the old guys i am quite convinced that most of us, particularly us hunters some non-hunters im not quite so sure on, would quickly develop the resourcefulness and toughness the situation demanded, it just happens far less often now.
technology and circumstance in and of themselves are irrelevant, the ones who survive and thrive generally are the ones who best adapt and make use of circumstances and resources available
ya, modern technology has made the everyday hunter kind of a wimp. I love to sit around my favorite gun shop and listen to the old hunters telling story's about when everyone wore plaid flannel jackets and would hunt for days at a time. but then they start telling us how lucky we are to have sub-moa rifles right out of the box and how great modern optics are,then it all goes down hill from there;)
Every man alive and working in 1920 was tougher than you. We aare fat and lazy, don't you read the papers?
I pull more than my share all day every day........ I could take my grandfather and my dad when they were young any day and time you name it. Superhero at large........................
No IPOD to receive FACEBOOK!
Different era, different experiences. The guys were tougher AND more self sufficient -- able to live off the land without anything but a gun and a hatchet.
Nothing wrong with modern equipment. It's overreliance on it that's wrong. Of course, there's nothing absolute here.
Soldiers and Marines now wear knee pads and goggles and body armor. Does that make them soft? Well, anything that's going to make it easier to defend the free world is welcome. But they should still master iron sights, learn to judge distance without rangefinders, use a compass, read maps, fend off for themselves - build a fire, find food, make shelter, etc. - when they're separated from their kit.
Hey, I'm practically talking about hunters, anglers and other outdoorsmen, too.
Ive posted twice on this,.
But this subject is kinda like shooting arrows into a lake at night.
You cant hear it hit,. yiou cant see it hit and you cant tell what you hit if anything
IE: futile effort .
So someone please do me a favor
Define tough,.. or art,..
or the diffference between pretty and beautifull,.
I'm sooo confused : )
Let's see that was ninety years ago. Yeah they were tough but what about the guys ninety years before them? Were the hunters of 1830 even tougher?
I am still in awe of my Dad, now 85. An ex-Navy WWII pilot, he is the embodiment of what they refer to as the last Great Generation. He never complained when I was a kid when we hunted together, no matter what the weather was. His comment to me was always; "Stop yer' complaining!" whenever I groused about the wet or the cold. His father, my grandfather, was the same. In their day and time, they saw everything and adapted accordingly. They will always be better men than I can ever be.
We still have tough people. People don't need to be cold and wet these days, because there is affordable equipment that could be had to prevent it. If they had this stuff 90 years ago, they would have worn it also. I wonder how many of those old farts who thought they were tougher than nails could have run a marathon, did triathlons or other activities that require a lot of stamina and strength. I am sure a good many of those people would have keeled over with a heart attack if someone had them do any of this stuff. Lots of lard butts still out there these days also, but those who ARE in shape are in a LOT better shape than people 90 years ago. In general, I think hunters have it easier these days than those in the past because of the increase in the deer populations everywhere. Years ago you had to go a good distance to see very few deer. These days you can see very many within miles of large urban areas, and in many places they can be hunted, so why does one need to rough it, when a deer can be had without roughing it?
On the points about roughing it, the weather hasn't changed much. It is still usually cold and miserable during most big game seasons. I have been just as cold and wet out hunting from before daylight to well after dark staying in a comfortable spot rather than sleeping in a tent or lean to. As a matter of fact, on several hunts, I spent way more time in the woods than some of the guys who were camping "on site". They were tempted to go back to camp during the day whereas my camp was 15 miles away. Once, when I went looking for my buddy who was supposed to be about 600 yards down the ridge, I found him about 1/2 mile away asleep in the truck because it was raining! Wimp! WTH if I had fallen and broken a leg?
Every generation, back to the aforementioned Neanderthal, has probably said; "Nook nowhere near tough as ancestor. Before spear we run down antelope and hit with rock."
As a field Marine, I have no desire to "relive the good old days". Sure, people were tough, and might live to be 40 if they were lucky. A generation or so back, people were pretty divided already. The tough farmer, outdoor type who had to hunt to feed his brood, but we already had the market-shopping, urban dweller by the millions. Neither group had much time, money, or inclination to "work out at the gym". Some didn't need to, and some didn't even consider it.
I think those people would have wanted any edge they could get. Warm clothes in mid-winter? Scoped rifles? Yep. The best stuff cost more money than a man hunting for necessary food had, so they lived without it. There's a story in my family about an uncle lost a few toes to frostbite one winter looking for meat. Do you even remotely think he wouldn't have wanted a pair of nice Bellville boots?
Watching Spirit of The Wild last night and notice Uncle Ted wasn't jumping down those Mountain Ridges like he did off those AMPs years ago.
Getting old sucks!
Clearly, outdoorsment of old were tougher in a lot of ways. Their world view was much different. I mean they were a product of their available choices. They grew up in a rougher/tougher world where independence, self reliance and skill were a way of life and,their expectations were different. They could not even imagine the technological advances we enjoy in equipment. Their sense of "sportsmanship" was different. They expected to have to work hard for success in the field because there were no other options, and to tell the truth, they propably wouldn't have had it any other way. They didn't expect trophy sized animals every outing and were damn well satisfied with bringing home some meat. It was about personal accomplishment and not about bragging rights. Most of the guys I hunted with are dead now, but if they were alive, they wouldn't have hunted any other way. They wanted to earn the right to be called a "good" hunter.
It pleased me to a great extent to say that that way of life still exists. Traditional archerers still do it the hard way. The stories in TRADITONAL BOWHUNTER MAGAZINE, for example, attest to the fact that the old worldview still exists and that there are some tough dudes out there. Imagine having to rely soley on your abilities to get within a few yards of your quarry to effect a lethal shot with traditional equipment, no less. These sportsmen and women glory in the challenge of the hunt and in the development of their abilities in the field. their sporting ethic is second to none.
This is a rather silly discussion. Everyone is trying to put the "average" person today with the "average" person of some yesteryear. The problem is that everyone has a different idea of what that person is. I know people today that would have no problem getting along a week or two with a knife and a pair of shorts. I also know a lot of weenies that would not stray off of a golf course to find a ball because they don't want to get ticks. This has very little to do with anything and has even less to do with some sort of 'average' man. Up until I was 24 I still hunted with whatever I could find and usually that meant putting an extra sweater on, two pairs of socks and the old orange hoodie that I found in my basement from 25 years ago from some hunter who forgot it at my parent's house. That was not tuff, that was poor. I would do it again if I had to but I don't because I have a job. I also upgraded from a 30-40 Krag that my grandfather traded for a deer back in the 60's for a brand knew rifle. New clothes and new gun does not equal weak. It equals expendable income. I process my meat from head to toe just like I always did. But now I have a pulley so I don't have to break my ass to get the darn thing hung. People are either smart or dumb, rich or poor (some combination of these). But having someone say that so and so was tougher that so and so generation is like arguing that one color is smarter than the other one. I've never needed a GPS but I could care less if the person down the street wants one to make them feel better. That doesn't give me any advantage over that person other than that I don't have to carry all that garbage through the snow. I guess it is easy to ramble on this. So I guess that this makes the topic blog worthy.
David, you are one provocative son of a buck.
I read this post yesterday and took some time to reflect on it today during work. As a carpenter on a highway/heavy construction crew, I had a demolition assignment. I ran a 75 lb. rock drill and a 90 lb jackhammer at odd angles, upwards, and sideways in the heat, the humidity and then the eventual monsoon in Minneapolis. When I finally pryed my hands off the jackhammer, my thought bubble read, "I wonder if I would have hacked it hunting in the woods 90 years ago!" I know It's apples to oranges, but the thought ws still absurd. And hilarious. Thanks for the laughs Mr. P.
Cbass
My grandad is closer to the woods than I am, that's skill not toughness.
My father was a better rifle shot than me, that was skill, not toughness.
My mother raised two boys, held down a job, and stayed beautiful and happy after Dad died too young, that was toughness.
I was watching some old logging video's and it showed a noticeable difference in grit, endurance, and mental/physical toughness of men from 3 generations ago. The logger used an axe to cut down what I would say was a 200+ year old hard wood tree top. I have experience swinging an axe and know the endurance it takes to take down soft pines that are a fraction of the size while standing on the ground and all I can say is "wow." Even experienced arborist would find this to be a challenge with a 40 inch or bigger chainsaw. These men did it day in and day out, and I am sure they shot a ton of game while we logged the majority of the lower 48. We are faker's and would feel unprepared without dropping 100's and 1000's of dollars on gear. Anyways, I am off to the private hunting club plantation, a legacy of the logging industry, in muck boats, riding in Ford's King Ranch lush air conditioned leather seats, wearing sunblock, and deet to install a 275 gallon tank to hold water for warm showers powered by batteries. Better to be a comfortable pussy than a miserable sweaty one. From the burbs to the bush in 2 hours, here comes plenty of water,and with it civilization. Cheers.
No way are we hunting as our past generations did. We are spoiled to death. Better enjoy this hunt as it may be your last. Also never pass up a animal o day one that you would give your eye tooth for in the lst hour of your hunt. The animal may not be the Monster you wanted, but few giants left. Just be happy and enjoy what you wereable to kill. If you are lucky enough to fill your tag on day one, ther is stil much to see and do. I learned that leason the hard way. Im 75 yrs old and I still recall that hunt as if yesterdaay.O how I wish I had taken the somewhat lesser animal that I had planed. Some lessons come hard. Also on hunting, buy and use the best ammo you csn find, as one shot is all you may get. Lear all you cn about your equiptment and how to use it, as it may save your life during the hunt. Now is not the time to skimp on life saving equiptment. Above all, enjoy what God gave us to see and enjoy. At 75 ys old, I look forward to each season as much as i did my first hunt Shoot ofte and straight.
Gunslinger
Truer words never spoken, my friend!
Best regards,
=S=
Every generation seeks to improve on the last. Do we have guns now that improve over the flash pans of old, yer damn right. Do we have the ability to instantly know where we are with GPS instead of using a compass and our wits, yer damn right. Do we spend thousands of dollars on exotic hunting trips our forefathers could only dream about, yer damn right. Have we become too reliant on technology and not enough on skill, yer damn right.
Lets face it gents, alot of our grandparents and great-grandparents hunted with what ever was available and grew up alot more in touch with the land then us. Were they tougher, maybe. Just remember it was a different world then. Women finally had the right to vote, Charles Lindbergh makes first trans-Atlantic crossing, there were only 48 stars on the flag, and the U.S. population was 115 million (309,699,183 now according to the U.S. Census Bureau).
I like to think our predecessors would be glad that the average American hunter has the resources that are available now, but I think they would also be disappointed at the urban sprawl, restricted hunting seasons, as well as decline of wild animal populations and available species to hunt.
Let us be thankful for the things that we have that our fathers did not, and let us continue to work as good stewards of the land so that our children may have more than we do.
I do think those of us who continue to hunt enjoy hunting more so than those of yesterday...Many of that period in our lives had to hunt to live.That was the only fresh meat they could afford. True, they were tough individuals as if not they never lived to be old like me. I also agree the rquiptment of today is superior of yesterday, but no knocking the 30-30. Let's omit,we are spoiled. W have a different gun for different game ( at least I do) thoe of yesterday were lucky if they had one gun period and they killed whatever they could find. As for physicial toughness there surely were tougher. As living off the land is back breaking hard work, I know as I grew up on a Tobacco farm and there ws always work to be done and most ws hard , and tought work. We were healthy as a rule, even with the new Medications most of that time were in good health. A few diseases did wipe out many families that today we make it after a few pills or shots.I think we have forgotten our fore-fathers and what they brought to the later generations. They instilled honesty, hard work, help the neighbors,tankful for what they did have and never tried to keep up with the Jones's. A long as they had a roof over their head, food on the table and all were well they were happy. Sorry that todays generation wants it all now for zilt. I hope I;m able to have a few more years to hunt, as hunting and guns keep me going today even with poor health. To bad theTV was invented. Let's all try to be pleased with what we got and have guns to hunt with, rather than a spear or etc. Pray for the younger generation for they got a rough road to hoe. Shoot up straight and often and be thankful you are able to do so. Just wish I was able to hunt daily, but $$$ and poor health prevents such..As I stated earlier, if teh first animal you see on a hunt is close to what you hunting for,take him as that may be all you see on that hunt. Last year I killed the first Mulie I saw ( not what I wanted) but was the only Mulie I saw in l2 days of hunting. He's hanging over my head now. Good luck to all and remember those less fortunate than you and I.
Post a Comment
The toughest men to ever walk the earth have long come and gone. They were tougher in the field as well as everywhere else. They went through harder times and complained less. However, they would have jumped at the opportunity to enjoy gore-tex, leopold, sub moa rifles and many of our other modern conveniences.
Tough guys are alive and well. The Army Rangers, Special Forces, Navy Seals, etc are full of them. The toughest man I ever met was an Airborne Ranger, SF instructor and member of Delta Force. He was also a survivor of jimmy carter's (no caps for him) failed Iran rescue mission but that is another story.
As for me I grew up hunting for food and fun in that order. Have never used a GPS and don't plan to anytime soon. Learn what a map and compass is for and you will never be lost because the battery went dead. No,I do not consider myself as tough as some of those guys.
The old timers did what they did because they had no other choice.
huntnow -
While I agree with your assessment that the toughest have come and gone, I am going to have to disagree with their willingness to accept the comforts we have. Almost without exception, all of the WWII generation I have encountered are gruff (at least on the exterior) and proud of the way they did it back then. I can only imagine how those who have passed would have viewed technology and advancements...most likely with disdain.
I don't know if the early frontiersmen were tougher than we are, but one thing that does stand out, is their resourcefulness;The ability to deal skillfully and promptly with new situations,difficulties and their relentless pursuit and exploration of a better life on the land they loved.
If they went huntin' in the rain, it certainly wasn't for pleasure, but for sustenance and survival. They knew the intricacies of fire starting in all types of weather conditions, life depended upon it. The axiom, "survivor of the fittest," certainly pertain to these hunters.
And therein, is the difference of the modern day hunter, versus the frontiersman of not so long ago, as history is measured.
Men back then, for the most part were never lost,they lived in the woods,were acquainted and prepared, or knew the lay of the land. They were much more intimate,not to mention wood and water wise.
They didn't have to worry about the distractions and obstacles as the modern day hunter does; such as, GPS's going dead for lack of power, text messages while in the woods that say,"honey on your way home, pick up some diapers," time constraints ... the list goes on!
I'm sure readers could comment more on modern day distractions found in the woods today.
A lot of modern day hunters, just as hunters of yesterday, still to some degree resist, the new fangled conveniences that are offered today. Once they become aquainted, realization trumps resistance.
Not related to hunters but the guys on deadliest catch, now there are some tough customers!
were they tuffer than us today? ABSOLOUTLY! was it by choice? NO! they took the state of the art technology with them just like we do today. just our technology is way advanced from what they had. just like their technology was way further ahead of 1830 technology. think about it from 1830 persons point of veiw. those 1920 hunters had repeating rifles, that shot self contained cartridges. with something called smokeless powder! they had specialized gear for hunting, with state of the art camoflage (which would have been red and black plaid wool). most of them carried compasses (the 1920's version of gps). they had worked out a distress call (3 shots in rapid secsession) to signal for help, in 1920, the crafty hunters were sitting in a tree looking down on critters from their recent idea of a homemade tree stand made from nailing a few 2"x12" peices of wood in the crotch of a tree with 2x4 steps nailed to the side of the tree. the really crafty guys, would have nailed a peice of canvas over their heads to stay dry in the rain. then, there was the outrageous spectacle of binoculars, instead of the old "spyglass" that would have been very rare indeed in the field in 1830. lets face it, we are men. and we are going to take advantage of every peice of technology we can in order to advance us in whatever we do. whether it is hunting, or traveling through space. in 2100, if there is still an america, if there is still hunting, they will probably using some kind of self guided mini-missles powered by an electromagnetic field. "field dressing will be an outrageous grossity that will no longer be nessesary. some sort of electronic device will do all of the gooey work for them. or, they might just order up a venison steak from their "local" electronic deli, becasue hunting will have been outlawed. if that is the case, i am glad i am living in the "cave man barbarian days" where people actually killed things.
Is a pigs tuchas pork?
There are still some of those strong hard seasoned veterans out there, but the kids coming up these days and even some of us are spoiled with our comforts. No changing back though.
Every generation gets a little softer. My Dad is a Vietnam-era guy (he was at Ia Drang in '65) and he's tougher than me. His dad was even tougher than him. My kids and their generation are shaping up to be softer than the country kids we were. I shudder to think how soft my great grandkids will be.
One great example is what passed for a hunting camp decades ago. Look for old photos, logs stacked into a shack no bigger than an outhouse, simply in a cave or under a large rock, cinderblock buildings with no bunks or stove. A lot of camps nowadays are elaborate tent set ups or family cabins...not what was a snakes den earlier in the summer!
DEP, I agree wholeheartedly. In Mr. Whelen's time, it was a bare bones hunt with a pack mule, if lucky. My last hunt, on our down time, was spent watching a NFL game via the Sat Dish on the roof of the Pop-out travel trailer! I mean, we "roughed it."
I dunno.
I guess it would be correct to say that more gear is available today that makes it much easier and more comfortable for those who can afford it.
But it is not difficult to find people in less-populated areas and less-moneyed circumstances whose means of hunting has changed little since the end of WWI.
Is this the real Uncle Ted?
You may be right auburn hunter, many of those of the Greatest Generation may be set in their ways and turn their noses up a our amenities. However, both of my grandfathers served in WWII and the first chance they had at a pair of boots that kept their feet dry and optics that enabled more accurate long distance shooting, they took full advantage of them.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with being comfortable in the wild. Heck, I once ran out of Skoal on a Northern Manitoba bear hunt and they flew a can in just for me. Dang that was a tough couple hours.
I would say absolutely!
I would add, that hunters at the turn of the century were outdoors men first, hunters second,...now I believe that the situation is reversed....most of us new to hunting are shooters first, then hunters,...and lastly outdoors men.
I grew up in the City, had just enough scouting experience to whet my appetite for the outdoors, but I in no way consider myself and outdoorsman.
I say that because if you were to drop me off in the middle of 2 square miles of thick woods, I might not make it out...and although I gain more confidence with each journey into and safely back out of the woods, I still get uncomfortable in the woods especially in the dark,...the old timers were not only at home in the woods, but very adept at finding game in the woods.
I think many hunters now are field or plot hunters, maybe a few get back onto a draw or oak ridge but few simply head out in search of game,...those that do, I admire a good deal.
You might be right Dave. Inspired by previous posts, I looked at my old Jack O'Connor books. The photos revealed no camo, rifles with wood stocks and in general clothing that looked like it came from the "working man" section of Sears.
You might be wrong Dave. I hunted with my son shortly after he returned from a USMC sponsored field trip in Falujah. It was cold, wet and miserable but he coped better than the rest of us.
Ya know, I was just reading some more O'Connor this weekend and it never fails to amaze me. The things they did in the places they went. Their stories are as amazing as any I've read or heard. There are some today who dare not venture down the manicured trailhead without a GPS and a cell-phone. Almost embarrassing to watch isn't it. I hope to be half the man, those old-timers were one day. Alaska anyone?
Wanna see tough guys? Watch the U.S. Army Ranger "Best Ranger " competition and tell me all the tough guys are gone! Ha!
http://www.bestrangercompetition.com/
My father was in his teens in the 20's when he started hunting in ME. and NH. He was a product of THE GREAT DEPRESSION and was happy to have anything that worked. As Del in KS stated about himself, my dad also hunted for food first and for sport later. But, thats how he learned.
I knew some very brave and tough guys when I servrd. Many died young, as it is now. I don't know or really care if my father was tougher than I am. All I know is that the whitetails he bragged about killing were a lot bigger than any I've ever seen.
I do think the 1920-30's hunters were tougher then the average hunter of today, but not by choice. Sure, life was tougher for everybody back then,in fact, I bet most of the US population farmed for a living, or at least grew food and raised animals just to survive. Farming was THE main industry back then, so being "soft" definately was a priviledge of the rich.
Hunting was a true act of survival and not necessarily enjoyment!
the generations before us were definitly tougher than we are today. i don't mean technology but the simple persistance and tolerance of poor conditions (be they in the field or in camp). hell, kids today don't even go out and play in the yard, instead they rot on video games and have a fraction of the outdoors exposure the generations before. at my place of employ we call it the continued pussification of america.
I think I could survive with a .22 pistol, ammo and appropriate attire just about anywhere as long as there is water.
We all can choose to bring that toughness back! We are bigger, stronger and have more knowledge at our very fingertips than any man in the 1920s. It remains our CHOICE to be soft. Our CHOICE to stay on the couch. We must choose to NOT be soft or stay on that Godforsaken couch. We must only look backward to gain knowledge from our fathers and grandfathers or remember their time with us, but to remain there is to become stagnant. We must pick ourselves up and make it happen! Get back in the gym, walk an extra quarter or half mile, choose to scout an extra day this year...don't let yourself get caught up in being soft. It's up to us. Paul's expression of "straining ever forward" means a great deal even today.
They simply made do with what they had. Dave I bet you saw alot of Savage 99's and Winchesters and Marlins in those articles because that's all thay had. In those days a peep sight was considered state of the art optics!
There are still tough people out there and you don't have to be an Airborn Ranger to be one. It's all state of mind. If you love to hunt you'll hunt cold and you'll hunt hungry. I know a bunch of fellows who back in November kept pushing Buffalo Grass for one more Rooster in cold driving sleet and rain pushed by a pretty stiff wind. At the end of the day all were cold, wet and tired, but they slep well that night. Know what? They got up and did it again the next day!
He wasn't sure folks were tougher, but for darn sure times were a lot tougher. This was the response to a similar question by me to an old time hunter back around 19 and 47. I was eight or so, and sitting around a campfire with four or five scruffy, old hunters trying to dry out while hunting mule deer. They all qualified for 1920's hunters. The one speaking said he wasn't so tough, he had been turned down by the Army in WWI because he had flat feet. Of course he was still hunting mean country in his 70's and walked everywhere as he never learned to drive. Hunting in the West you often must cover a lot of miles. In fact, three of the five had never learned to drive.
These were all some of the best hunters I have ever known, and believe me, I have known some real great ones over the past 60 years hunting. No one had rain coats, heavy jackets, waterproof shoes, gloves, or any commercial hunting gear. Even their knives were what they used every day or came from their kitchen. No one owned a sleeping bag, just made do with an old blanket. Anything more would have made hunting uneconomical. The purpose was meat and a chance to spend time with friends. As I recall, the firearms included a 25-35, two 30-30s, a 35 Remington semi auto which always jammed after the first shot, and a battered Enfield 06 military stock. All were second or third hand. They always got venison, if it took all season.
If they got cold, wet, or tired, the rule was get out of the wind and build a fire. If you got discouraged or confused, build a fire. Someone would show up to the smoke, hopefully with a bottle.
I sure miss those folks and those days.
If you got cold, tired or, wet, the rule was get out of the wind and build a fire.
Beekeeper, Do I know those pheasant hunters? Not sure about tough on that one. Maybe too dumb to quit, ha,ha. We did bag a limit of roosters and had great fun doing it. You sir are welcome to come back to deer, duck, pheasant or turkey hunt if you wish. Remember all the ducks we saw. Next time we will take some decoys and wadders just in case.
My older brother is one of the toughest men I have ever known. As a kid I remember watching as he climbed a tall Florida longleaf pine and punched a large boar coon off his limb. It was at least 30 feet to the first limb. If you ever tried to climb one of those you know what I am talking about. At age 52 he got Emphysema (spelling?) and 2 other serious ailments. We did not think he would live another 5 years. Today he is 75, still runs a pack of fox hounds and spends much time in the Fla swamps. Somehow he always found time to hunt (at night) while working 12 hrs a day 6 days a week in heavy equipment construction. He raised 7 children on chicken feed wages. The man would have made a great soldier.
BTW my brother did quit smoking.
My grandad is closer to the woods than I am, that's skill not toughness.
My father was a better rifle shot than me, that was skill, not toughness.
My mother raised two boys, held down a job, and stayed beautiful and happy after Dad died too young, that was toughness.
You might be right Dave. Inspired by previous posts, I looked at my old Jack O'Connor books. Photos revealed clothing that looks like it came from the "working man's section" at Sears.
You might be wrong Dave. I hunted with my son shortly after he returned from a USMC field trip to Falujah. It was wet, cold and miserable but he coped bettern than the "old timers" on the trip.
There still are plenty of tough guys out there, but most hunters certainly are not. I include myself these days in the latter lot. When I was in my 20s I once backpacked 45 miles in two days while carrying a 40-pound pack. I could walk all day in any sort of terrain until I got to be about 50. Now, at age 61 with arthritis and an artificial knee and hip, I do well to hobble around the block.
Speaking of the tough guys of previous generations, I remember reading in one of Teddy Roosevelt's books about him hunting mountain goats somewhere out west. He left camp on foot for several days with, as I remember, a packet of salt and some bread. His choice of diet still puzzles me, and I probably would have starved on those rations within two days. But Roosevelt didn't seem to pay it a second thought.
When I lived in Great Falls, MT my next door neighbor was an Air Force reserve colonel and a jet fighter pilot. He used to like to say to his young pilots, "You think you are tough?" Then he would tell them about the members of the Lewis & Clark Expedition, pulling boats up the Missouri River against the current, clad in mocassins and other substandard clothing, and living under primitive conditions that none of them could imagine.
A few years ago I read a wonderful book, the name of which escapes me, about party of explorers who went to Anarctica around the time of World War I. They got ice-bound, had to set out in rowboats, were gone a couple years. (Someone please help me out with the title!) It is a story of adventure, hardship, survival and toughness that left me in a state of awe.
All kinds of tough guys out there,. now and before,..
if you look at cloths boots tools guns and knives from then
They didnt have near as good as we do now .
But actually not bad .
Still ,.anyone know of a cordless hammer drill from 1919.?
Anyone know of an air nailer from that time
No ,,. because it didnt exist.
One MOA acuuracy ?? : ) . they didnt know what that was or care . 3 inches at 100 yds was a tac driver : )
30-06 30-40s 30-30 45 -70 etc etc did the job .
Howevr ,. ( would venture) most of the hunters living in the squirrl shacks or old loggers barracks or tents ,. were not big shots from Chcicago New york or Philly ,.
They were mostly farmers ,or in some capacity, men of the land.
They had learned youg what to do to stay warm (mostly ) out side all day ,. they got up at 4am and went to bed when the light faded ,.
I never knew a guy my garndfathers age who was fat because no matter how much he ate it was burned off from activity IE: Work .
They were also used to less and the made due
And they were also many times dead at 60 +/-.
So is dead at 60 tuff or just worn out,.
I submit to you the latter .
Today we live longer becausse we know more science, and medicine, we eat better,. sleep better and are more comfortable. Yup thats right comforatble .
IE; not constantly feezing your A$$ off.
I never ran into a smart guy who practiced being wet cold and misserable, because thats just stupid .
But I have known guys who will brave ugly conditions to hunt
Also knew a guy my grand fathers age who always carried 1/2 an army pup tent. Just in case it rained or snowed like hell. To him it mant more time in the woods,.. Becase even thick wool coats wouldnt shed weater like a pice of tent canvas,.
Plus they knew back then it took time to hunt,,. no cell phones no inetrnet to telephones
They went hunting for days or weeks at a a time ,.. promarily for food the sport was second ,.
but he comarodrie ( sp ? ) was unavoidable.
.
I spent three days once,. in a pine bow liento,( sp ?) . it snowed,. it raned,. and it was foggy and then it turned colder that all billy hell.
I was mostly dry becusse the old guy running that show knew enough to get ready for bad weathet ,so we took no real hurt because we had a fire going constantly,.
The old guy actually shot a fat 6 pt buck from his place by the fire when it was raining.
He enever quit watching
Tougher ,.nah,. better shape sure ( from working ) but better able to survive due to wood craft they knew from the time they were ten.
Before I get to far down the trail would like to do that leinto thing again ,.. That reaay was something.
Tougher?? ,. I doubt
Better shape and ,. better prepared? ,. probably.
Damn right they were tougher. May be hard to admit guys but why? Our forefathers did everything with their brawn sweat and muscles. No google, gps or cell phones to help find an easy way to do it. They were one tough MoFo generation. JMO jim
Humans do what we have to do with what we have. I don't think people were any tougher back then. I think they were tougher minded, though. Running water, flushing toilets, gas heat, and medical treatment were luxuries to many. And bug repellent? We have it and like it but we would do without if we had to.
Knowledge is the other thing. Going out for a few days or weeks or even months at a time seems to have been normal. They knew what they had to do to get by. Now if someone returns from being dislocated for more than a day or two we call them survivors.
Perhaps it is just the mentality. Unfortunately, survival is more print worthy than outdoorsmanship.
I'm not sure if they were tougher than we are, but they were certainly better woodsmen than we are. They went afield with only a compass,a map in their head and the sun and stars to navigate with in woods with far fewer roads, and two tracks and RV trails than today. I had the privlege to grow up deer hunting with a few of these fellas. One in particular would get up before everyone else, cook breakfast for everyone, and get dressed and be gone into the morning moonlight before anyone had started eating breakfast. When everyone else finaly got ready they would pile in a pickup and drive down the road 5 miles and then up a old two track another 2.5 miles and find this fella waiting at the end of the two track, sitting on a stump smoking a cigarette after he had walked cross lots 6 miles in the dark with no flashlight. I always wondered what possessed a 60 year old man to do something like that on a daily basis. I think he was setting the bar for the younger ones.
Dave,
Yes, there are great young men (and women) today that are damn tough. Yes, there are more who are not.
You cannot be tough without a drive and a reason, which can be military, family history, personal drive and where you choose to live. I have lived in AK for over 50 years and the number of tough are now mostly out of any metropolitan area and/or other area with cable tv. With SAT phones and all it is getting harder to even get away in AK. 911 calls inundate the cell phone range coverage for someone to come pick me up - I am cold and hungry or just tired.
As Professional Hunter and Outfitter for most of those 50+ years here in AK I now see more and more of the world turning to 5* Lodges with 'introduced' specie or fenced areas with special feed and gene pools, etc. Look at the SCI record books to see how they have been accommodated to recognize the prowess of hunting comfortably.
On this subject you could add another recommended reading list of books that cover some of the older days - I recommend a few, below, and having had the pleasure of visiting the book room at Campfire Club, briefly, I could have camped there for days just reading some I had never seen.
1. Hunting the Alaska Brown Bear - Eddy
2. Alaska Yukon Trophies Won and Lost - Young
3. Hunting in the Arctic and Alaska - Skull
4. From Out of the Yukon - James Bond
Please add some of the others you know better than I.
I don't want to be "tough" no more! Enough sleeping in the rain and mud, cold and wind to do me a lifetime. No thanks, but I got enough practice in 7 1/2 years in the Army! LOL
Tell me who the tough guys are and I'll send them a postcard.
I don't know how tough hunters and outdoorsmen were in the 1920's but I do know that I was a _ell of a lot tougher myself about 30-40 years ago when I could not afford good equipment. Hunted in cotton long johns, blue jeans and a old navy pea coat, no map, only a compass, knife, matches, gun and a little bit of ammo that had to suffice. We would go fishing on a river, had an old aluminum boat, no motor, we would walk the bank towing the boat on a rope till we got to where we wanted to camp and fish. Only took some lard and meal, if we wanted to eat, we had to catch fish. One evening after a heavy rain, we set up camp on a sandbar that was swept clean by the rain, laid out a old tarp, went to sleep, the next morning we saw where a very large aligator had crossed the sandbar within feet of where we were sleeping, no one suggested we move camp or go home.
I know some pretty tough birds who still hunt the back north woods. They go in at grey dawn and come out tommorrow some time. These are men in their 60's carrying pump remmingtons.
They carry simple gear, just like the old timers.
Alas I am not one of them. I like sitting on ambush with my 6.5x55!
I would agree with WA Mtnhunter,...I've got a buddy who(along with his partner) won "best Ranger" a few years back, one tough son of a gun, but to see him in civies you'd never know it, slight of build, mild mannered gentleman,...two tours in Afghanistan, and dropped into Baghdad airfield,...but back to hunters,...if you haven't read them, I'd suggest reading Teddy's Roosevelt hunter trilogy, those conditions were a bit more difficult than today's conditions,...ever run into an shoshone war party?
I've read Whelan's account of his British Columbia trip.
How many people today would know how to use a compass?
I don't know if they were tougher than some people today; military special forces units are some damn tough people, but yesterday's hunters were definitely more adventurous and self sufficient than we are today. If I had to sleep on the ground on a hunting trip, I would hope my hunting buddy would be a chiropractor.
You can run with this debate back 2,000 years to the ice man who had the DNA of 4 different men on his flint knife, and carried bush craft goods and clothes made out of hide with fur. Speaking for the generation interconnect I can say we are pussies who phone the AC repairman when it gets hotter than 72 in the house, and when my toes get cold its time to "scout" for bedded dear. Regardless of conditions their are a few things we can do to regain some resemblance to previous men. Not complain, but problem solve. Build a fire without a match for the challenge. Fully process our own deer/fish/game. Build stairs on tower stands for very young and very old. Insist on a wood burning stove. Fish from a canoe, sleep in a tent, and take care not to injure back, fingers, etc when working. Walk more and ride less. These are a few tips on how modern girly- men can protect a few traits of the previousily tougher self.
Many years ago, while in college and on the way home on break from Penn State, I stopped to pick out an Angus bull at Gilbert Watts' farm on Rt 220 west of Altoona. We looked at some likely bulls, and then headed to his farm office to look at the herd book. While he was leafing through the book (he was in his upper 70's or so then, back in 1978), I gawked at the very fine 9-pt mounted above his desk, "That's a nice one, Mr. Watts." "Yep", he said. Pointing to the mountains across the highway he added, "I got him three valleys beyond that pass." After we talked about deer for a bit he summed up with, "My grandad was the one. He never thought much of a man if he couldn't stick it out all day on stand if it was above freezing." Gilbert Watts was a great guy, and he had good bulls.
My Granddaddy hunted in the 30's, and he was a tough sob, but he wasn't stupid. He upgraded his gear eventually over the years. Granted, it was slowly, as he was as stubborn as a mule. But, as old boots and coats wore out, new 'improved' ones were bought. Now, when something worked, he stuck w/it religously, as is the case w/his pre-64 Mod.70, which he used exclusively for 50 years, then thankfully gave to me. I've got all the gear and gadgets, but that old .270 flat out works, so it's what I'll be carrying in the deer woods for many seasons to come. But yeah, he was tougher than I.
hey 2poppa, long time since I've heard from you on hear, how you been? I find myself going back and looking at my grandpa's magazines from the 50's and tend to notice that even at that time people depended more on there instincts and guts then anything modern or new, and you could still by a purebred coon hound for 50 dollars.
Different era, different experiences. The guys were tougher AND more self sufficient -- able to live off the land without anything but a gun and a hatchet.
I am still in awe of my Dad, now 85. An ex-Navy WWII pilot, he is the embodiment of what they refer to as the last Great Generation. He never complained when I was a kid when we hunted together, no matter what the weather was. His comment to me was always; "Stop yer' complaining!" whenever I groused about the wet or the cold. His father, my grandfather, was the same. In their day and time, they saw everything and adapted accordingly. They will always be better men than I can ever be.
Every generation, back to the aforementioned Neanderthal, has probably said; "Nook nowhere near tough as ancestor. Before spear we run down antelope and hit with rock."
As a field Marine, I have no desire to "relive the good old days". Sure, people were tough, and might live to be 40 if they were lucky. A generation or so back, people were pretty divided already. The tough farmer, outdoor type who had to hunt to feed his brood, but we already had the market-shopping, urban dweller by the millions. Neither group had much time, money, or inclination to "work out at the gym". Some didn't need to, and some didn't even consider it.
I think those people would have wanted any edge they could get. Warm clothes in mid-winter? Scoped rifles? Yep. The best stuff cost more money than a man hunting for necessary food had, so they lived without it. There's a story in my family about an uncle lost a few toes to frostbite one winter looking for meat. Do you even remotely think he wouldn't have wanted a pair of nice Bellville boots?
This is a rather silly discussion. Everyone is trying to put the "average" person today with the "average" person of some yesteryear. The problem is that everyone has a different idea of what that person is. I know people today that would have no problem getting along a week or two with a knife and a pair of shorts. I also know a lot of weenies that would not stray off of a golf course to find a ball because they don't want to get ticks. This has very little to do with anything and has even less to do with some sort of 'average' man. Up until I was 24 I still hunted with whatever I could find and usually that meant putting an extra sweater on, two pairs of socks and the old orange hoodie that I found in my basement from 25 years ago from some hunter who forgot it at my parent's house. That was not tuff, that was poor. I would do it again if I had to but I don't because I have a job. I also upgraded from a 30-40 Krag that my grandfather traded for a deer back in the 60's for a brand knew rifle. New clothes and new gun does not equal weak. It equals expendable income. I process my meat from head to toe just like I always did. But now I have a pulley so I don't have to break my ass to get the darn thing hung. People are either smart or dumb, rich or poor (some combination of these). But having someone say that so and so was tougher that so and so generation is like arguing that one color is smarter than the other one. I've never needed a GPS but I could care less if the person down the street wants one to make them feel better. That doesn't give me any advantage over that person other than that I don't have to carry all that garbage through the snow. I guess it is easy to ramble on this. So I guess that this makes the topic blog worthy.
I was watching some old logging video's and it showed a noticeable difference in grit, endurance, and mental/physical toughness of men from 3 generations ago. The logger used an axe to cut down what I would say was a 200+ year old hard wood tree top. I have experience swinging an axe and know the endurance it takes to take down soft pines that are a fraction of the size while standing on the ground and all I can say is "wow." Even experienced arborist would find this to be a challenge with a 40 inch or bigger chainsaw. These men did it day in and day out, and I am sure they shot a ton of game while we logged the majority of the lower 48. We are faker's and would feel unprepared without dropping 100's and 1000's of dollars on gear. Anyways, I am off to the private hunting club plantation, a legacy of the logging industry, in muck boats, riding in Ford's King Ranch lush air conditioned leather seats, wearing sunblock, and deet to install a 275 gallon tank to hold water for warm showers powered by batteries. Better to be a comfortable pussy than a miserable sweaty one. From the burbs to the bush in 2 hours, here comes plenty of water,and with it civilization. Cheers.
No way are we hunting as our past generations did. We are spoiled to death. Better enjoy this hunt as it may be your last. Also never pass up a animal o day one that you would give your eye tooth for in the lst hour of your hunt. The animal may not be the Monster you wanted, but few giants left. Just be happy and enjoy what you wereable to kill. If you are lucky enough to fill your tag on day one, ther is stil much to see and do. I learned that leason the hard way. Im 75 yrs old and I still recall that hunt as if yesterdaay.O how I wish I had taken the somewhat lesser animal that I had planed. Some lessons come hard. Also on hunting, buy and use the best ammo you csn find, as one shot is all you may get. Lear all you cn about your equiptment and how to use it, as it may save your life during the hunt. Now is not the time to skimp on life saving equiptment. Above all, enjoy what God gave us to see and enjoy. At 75 ys old, I look forward to each season as much as i did my first hunt Shoot ofte and straight.
my uncle (ex101st airborne dels right they are resilient) turned me onto an idea a couple of years ago he grew up in the city but every summer from when he was 13 on til he left for the army he would hike several miles away to a wildlife area (one time about 60miles from home ) and set up his own camp and live off the land. never brought more than what he could carry on his back no tent a tarp most of the time. he spent every waking moment in the woods, He usually told my grandma where he was going roughly and went. He has some great stories and can cook and fish with plants i never would of figured out were edible. its kind of like the movie into to wild but my uncle had a better book apparently. My uncles only 45 but i would imagine thats what many of the the 1920 era would do regularly if they were outdoorsman.
i don't really consider myself close to as tough or resilient as many of my forefathers . so yes they were better especially without the modern day equipment.
The answer is obvious. The real question is whether the old timers are rolling over in their graves or just plain laughing at us.
One thing that I think has not changed is the way that we pick our partners when heading to the outdoors. It doesn't matter if it hunting, fishing, rafting or hiking we all want someone with us who is reliable, trustworthy and able.
The luxury of modern equipment has, without a doubt, made us softer than the men who walked before us. But when push comes to shove, none of us want someone with us who is going to just quit!
Tough guys (and gals) are to be admired, and some are even made into minor legends. As we get older, it is hard to be as tough as when we were younger. Do what you are able to do without getting crazy about it just to prove you are "one of the tough", and enjoy the hunt.
YUK YUK
WA Mtn hunter
Made me laugh IE:( lOl ) and with the f ing weather were having in upper midwest thats a +1 for you
Like an episode of Scienfeld ( sp? )
"But I dont wanna be a pirate." YUK YUK
If tough means suffering I dont wanna be tough.
Or a G d Pirate : ) either.
To me the difference is smart or not smart .
Two different guys can go into the same circumstance. One will suffer and oe will not or at least a lot less.
You might call smart prepaired too ,. but the less suffering you do (usually) the better time you have and the more likley you are to do it again .
Or you figure out smart,. so you dont suffer the next time.
Tough is really a relative term ,.. am I toug enough to enhdure child birth < I wwoud have to say definitly NOT.
Am I as tough as Chineese a soldier in korea ,..armed with club or nothing ,.and no shes in the Korean winter,. charging American lines ,. nope I am not ,.
But Im not crazy either.
One very good book: "Grizzlies Don't Come Easy! My life as an Alaskan bear hunter" by Ralph W. Young.
He guided famous hunters like Jack O'Conner and Warren Page. Forward by Peter Barrett of Field & Stream.
Silvertip
In a word, "Wool". Lotsa wool.Once you get past the itch it's the warmest natural fiber. An example is wool socks will keep you warm in the winter and cool in the summer.
I agree they were tougher or at least tried and tested in ways many of us will never experience. I disagree that we're spoiled today. I'm not spoiled. I have collected and discarded my gear through trial and error andI greatly appreciate my gear and completely understand the level of comfort and protection it provides me. Thank you modern materials if not modern gadgets.
In Alaska, I always told new comers the 22 pistol and a good pair of running boots is the ultimate bear protection. Simply put, when the bear charges you shoot your buddy in the ankle and run like hell!
All jokes aside, years ago it was mind over body!
You can take 3 individuals, a person who mastered triathlon, the most book smart person you can find and a kid. Toss them in an environment lets say the arctic, which one is most like to survive?
The kid is the most likely to survive for one reason, the will to survive!
If I remember right I think it was 88 if not 89, an Alaska Bush Pilot committed suicide and the note read, mosquito are hitting the windshield etc can't handle it. Shortly after the pilot ended his life, a rescue chopper arrived!
One thing I've learned in Alaska, when you think your all alone, somebody is watching from afar, Alaska "THE LAND OF OPTICS"!!
I challenge anyone to remain as still as my Grandson Alex even when he was age 8! I tell'ya, at times I think this Young Man is asleep at times! He knows His Sport and truly loves the great outdoors!
People are as tough as will and need requires. Most folks are soft because they don't need to be tough and they have never developed the sense of will and drive that would impell them to strengthen themselves. However adversity both teaches and weeds the garden. Those who face adversity toughen or fall. I know many people who are "weak sticks" that can't be relied upon because they break under pressure. If you want to know someone's quality, go do something arduous and difficult with them, something that drives you both to your limits, and then you'll know if you can rely on them or if they grouse and fade.
WA Mtnhunter...send a post card to:
United States Army, 10th Mountain Division, Helmand Province, Afghanistan. I'm sure the men who wear the crossed swords shoulder patch would take a break from Burning The Taliban and reply.
Give them 2 weeks, I know you'll hear from them.
The clothing and gear I rely upon today is much better, much more efficient, than the stuff I used in the '60s. I can't make a comparison to the '20s (before my time) but I wouldn't step back in time to the coats and trousers I used years ago!
I'm sure those who could afford it in the 1920s used the best available, and that hasn't changed a bit. I admire my grandfather's tenacity and work ethic, rest his soul, but I'm grateful my world is different, presumably better, and I'm grateful for the progress.
Those who pine for the "good old days" or comment that "They don't make 'em like they used to" should take a moment to reconsider. There are rifles that were expensive to produce and are no longer in production. Yes, I mourn for a few of them. However, there are fabrics and outdoor clothing now that makes the "old days" seem primitive by comparison, and I'd be a hypocrite to say I'd trade any of it for what hung in my closet forty years ago!
I have to remember stories of "Black Pete" so named because smoke from his kerosene cook stove had him pretty much blackened up by Spring, when he came out to sell furs and buy "commodities and possibles". About 7 miles to the nearest gravel road and about the same milage to town.He took his twice yearly bath after he got back to camp (small shack, about 12 by 16 ). One bath in the spring, after ice out and one in the fall before ice up. He wore 3 layers of clothes that he rotated, inside layer to outside about every week, simply wore them out and then replaced them with a new layer, long johns (not part of the three) got changed twice a year.
He died in the Spring, caught in a late snow storm on his way to buy his spring supplies.
Friends found that he had amputated his own leg during the winter carved his own crutch and continued trapping and doing his thing until that Spring storm caught him half way to town.
Anybody that tough?
I watched the Natives in Alaska continually put there hands in freezing water, didn't bother them a bit but froze my hands in seconds!
Del,
Sometimes lack of intelligence has a lot to do with it!
Oh, the Sourwood trees are blooming and the bees are up there on the Blueridge working. Keep your fingers crossed!
i would agree with the fact that previous generations were "tougher" in a way, outdoorsmen or not, though realistically they were that way because they had to be. Although there are plenty of old guys out there who still prefer to go about it that way, and some who have embraced modern tech, the ones who dont i would guess do it more so because its been engrained in them to do so through years of making things work the tough way, had they grown up with our technology i am quite confident they for the most part would be no "tougher" than us. with that being said i am going to do things the way they have been done for countless years and use the best technology available to me. And an aside on toughness, i am not quite convinced we are that much less tough than they were, if forced into situations were we were required to be as tough as the old guys i am quite convinced that most of us, particularly us hunters some non-hunters im not quite so sure on, would quickly develop the resourcefulness and toughness the situation demanded, it just happens far less often now.
technology and circumstance in and of themselves are irrelevant, the ones who survive and thrive generally are the ones who best adapt and make use of circumstances and resources available
ya, modern technology has made the everyday hunter kind of a wimp. I love to sit around my favorite gun shop and listen to the old hunters telling story's about when everyone wore plaid flannel jackets and would hunt for days at a time. but then they start telling us how lucky we are to have sub-moa rifles right out of the box and how great modern optics are,then it all goes down hill from there;)
Every man alive and working in 1920 was tougher than you. We aare fat and lazy, don't you read the papers?
I pull more than my share all day every day........ I could take my grandfather and my dad when they were young any day and time you name it. Superhero at large........................
No IPOD to receive FACEBOOK!
Nothing wrong with modern equipment. It's overreliance on it that's wrong. Of course, there's nothing absolute here.
Soldiers and Marines now wear knee pads and goggles and body armor. Does that make them soft? Well, anything that's going to make it easier to defend the free world is welcome. But they should still master iron sights, learn to judge distance without rangefinders, use a compass, read maps, fend off for themselves - build a fire, find food, make shelter, etc. - when they're separated from their kit.
Hey, I'm practically talking about hunters, anglers and other outdoorsmen, too.
Let's see that was ninety years ago. Yeah they were tough but what about the guys ninety years before them? Were the hunters of 1830 even tougher?
We still have tough people. People don't need to be cold and wet these days, because there is affordable equipment that could be had to prevent it. If they had this stuff 90 years ago, they would have worn it also. I wonder how many of those old farts who thought they were tougher than nails could have run a marathon, did triathlons or other activities that require a lot of stamina and strength. I am sure a good many of those people would have keeled over with a heart attack if someone had them do any of this stuff. Lots of lard butts still out there these days also, but those who ARE in shape are in a LOT better shape than people 90 years ago. In general, I think hunters have it easier these days than those in the past because of the increase in the deer populations everywhere. Years ago you had to go a good distance to see very few deer. These days you can see very many within miles of large urban areas, and in many places they can be hunted, so why does one need to rough it, when a deer can be had without roughing it?
On the points about roughing it, the weather hasn't changed much. It is still usually cold and miserable during most big game seasons. I have been just as cold and wet out hunting from before daylight to well after dark staying in a comfortable spot rather than sleeping in a tent or lean to. As a matter of fact, on several hunts, I spent way more time in the woods than some of the guys who were camping "on site". They were tempted to go back to camp during the day whereas my camp was 15 miles away. Once, when I went looking for my buddy who was supposed to be about 600 yards down the ridge, I found him about 1/2 mile away asleep in the truck because it was raining! Wimp! WTH if I had fallen and broken a leg?
Watching Spirit of The Wild last night and notice Uncle Ted wasn't jumping down those Mountain Ridges like he did off those AMPs years ago.
Getting old sucks!
Clearly, outdoorsment of old were tougher in a lot of ways. Their world view was much different. I mean they were a product of their available choices. They grew up in a rougher/tougher world where independence, self reliance and skill were a way of life and,their expectations were different. They could not even imagine the technological advances we enjoy in equipment. Their sense of "sportsmanship" was different. They expected to have to work hard for success in the field because there were no other options, and to tell the truth, they propably wouldn't have had it any other way. They didn't expect trophy sized animals every outing and were damn well satisfied with bringing home some meat. It was about personal accomplishment and not about bragging rights. Most of the guys I hunted with are dead now, but if they were alive, they wouldn't have hunted any other way. They wanted to earn the right to be called a "good" hunter.
It pleased me to a great extent to say that that way of life still exists. Traditional archerers still do it the hard way. The stories in TRADITONAL BOWHUNTER MAGAZINE, for example, attest to the fact that the old worldview still exists and that there are some tough dudes out there. Imagine having to rely soley on your abilities to get within a few yards of your quarry to effect a lethal shot with traditional equipment, no less. These sportsmen and women glory in the challenge of the hunt and in the development of their abilities in the field. their sporting ethic is second to none.
David, you are one provocative son of a buck.
I read this post yesterday and took some time to reflect on it today during work. As a carpenter on a highway/heavy construction crew, I had a demolition assignment. I ran a 75 lb. rock drill and a 90 lb jackhammer at odd angles, upwards, and sideways in the heat, the humidity and then the eventual monsoon in Minneapolis. When I finally pryed my hands off the jackhammer, my thought bubble read, "I wonder if I would have hacked it hunting in the woods 90 years ago!" I know It's apples to oranges, but the thought ws still absurd. And hilarious. Thanks for the laughs Mr. P.
Cbass
Gunslinger
Truer words never spoken, my friend!
Best regards,
=S=
Every generation seeks to improve on the last. Do we have guns now that improve over the flash pans of old, yer damn right. Do we have the ability to instantly know where we are with GPS instead of using a compass and our wits, yer damn right. Do we spend thousands of dollars on exotic hunting trips our forefathers could only dream about, yer damn right. Have we become too reliant on technology and not enough on skill, yer damn right.
Lets face it gents, alot of our grandparents and great-grandparents hunted with what ever was available and grew up alot more in touch with the land then us. Were they tougher, maybe. Just remember it was a different world then. Women finally had the right to vote, Charles Lindbergh makes first trans-Atlantic crossing, there were only 48 stars on the flag, and the U.S. population was 115 million (309,699,183 now according to the U.S. Census Bureau).
I like to think our predecessors would be glad that the average American hunter has the resources that are available now, but I think they would also be disappointed at the urban sprawl, restricted hunting seasons, as well as decline of wild animal populations and available species to hunt.
Let us be thankful for the things that we have that our fathers did not, and let us continue to work as good stewards of the land so that our children may have more than we do.
I do think those of us who continue to hunt enjoy hunting more so than those of yesterday...Many of that period in our lives had to hunt to live.That was the only fresh meat they could afford. True, they were tough individuals as if not they never lived to be old like me. I also agree the rquiptment of today is superior of yesterday, but no knocking the 30-30. Let's omit,we are spoiled. W have a different gun for different game ( at least I do) thoe of yesterday were lucky if they had one gun period and they killed whatever they could find. As for physicial toughness there surely were tougher. As living off the land is back breaking hard work, I know as I grew up on a Tobacco farm and there ws always work to be done and most ws hard , and tought work. We were healthy as a rule, even with the new Medications most of that time were in good health. A few diseases did wipe out many families that today we make it after a few pills or shots.I think we have forgotten our fore-fathers and what they brought to the later generations. They instilled honesty, hard work, help the neighbors,tankful for what they did have and never tried to keep up with the Jones's. A long as they had a roof over their head, food on the table and all were well they were happy. Sorry that todays generation wants it all now for zilt. I hope I;m able to have a few more years to hunt, as hunting and guns keep me going today even with poor health. To bad theTV was invented. Let's all try to be pleased with what we got and have guns to hunt with, rather than a spear or etc. Pray for the younger generation for they got a rough road to hoe. Shoot up straight and often and be thankful you are able to do so. Just wish I was able to hunt daily, but $$$ and poor health prevents such..As I stated earlier, if teh first animal you see on a hunt is close to what you hunting for,take him as that may be all you see on that hunt. Last year I killed the first Mulie I saw ( not what I wanted) but was the only Mulie I saw in l2 days of hunting. He's hanging over my head now. Good luck to all and remember those less fortunate than you and I.
Hot damn!!!! Sourwood is my favorite honey!!!! Dang it Bee now I'm drooling all over the keyboard thinking about biscuits and Sourwood honey.
Ive posted twice on this,.
But this subject is kinda like shooting arrows into a lake at night.
You cant hear it hit,. yiou cant see it hit and you cant tell what you hit if anything
IE: futile effort .
So someone please do me a favor
Define tough,.. or art,..
or the diffference between pretty and beautifull,.
I'm sooo confused : )
Post a Comment