


March 10, 2009
Gear Review: Oakley Polarized Sunglasses
By Kirk Deeter
I've often said that, as a guide, if I forget my waders in the morning on the way to the river, I'll wet-wade in (almost) any season. But if I forget my sunglasses, I'll go back home and get them, and make up lost time at the end of the day. Shades are that important to me on the water... how about you?
I was interested when I heard that Oakley, the Southern California-based company with a notable flair for sports marketing was wading into flyfishing with a polarized product line. I wondered why a company that goes large (Lance Armstrong in cycling, Shaun White in snowboarding...) would bother to dabble in this niche of fur, feathers, graphite, and Gore-Tex. Frankly if the big "O" was going to get called out on polarized performance anywhere it would be on the flats... or in the river.
Apparently, they knew that, and they were cool with it. They should be. I had a chance to field test multiple Oakley styles in various tints in what might just be the most demanding sight fishing theater in the world-- Ascension Bay in Mexico. (Often in tough, flat-lit, cloudy conditions.)
Three things stood out in Oakley's "high definition" optics... first the thickness of the lenses are corrected incrementally to ensure light enters the eyes at the proper, straight angles. Sounds simple but it's not... and the net effect is noticably less strain at the end of the fishing day. (For comparison's sake, I donned a pair of Maui Jims, which were, for me, almost unwearable). Second, the lenses are made with a hydrophobic coating that keeps water, dust, and oils from affecting them and your vision. I definitely spotted fish well (casting at those fish well was another story). Third, the frames don't pinch or leave divots on my nose, so they rate high for me in wear-comfort. In all, I found them to be a very effective blend of technology and wear-ability that transposes well to any fishing environment.
My favorites were the "Monster Dog" frames in a "Shallow Blue" tint, pictured above. MSRP $155.
Comments (24)
I will only wear Oakleys. I have custom ordered 5 pair off of thier web site. They HAVE to be polarized, I don't like to have a glare when I'm hunting or fishing. My favorites are th XLJ Half Jackets.
I'd have to saw that Oakley has some of the worst styled sunglasses on the planet. I have been going with Spy or Smith. Keanons and Costas don't fit me right.
smith super method polarzied are around my neck as i type
(can't forget the croakie/lanyard-thingy)
I've been wearing a the same pair of polarized Oakley 5s for three years now... They fit perfect, are very comfortable, and really do enhance things to an HD like view.
My only complaint... They scratch VERY easily, and I'm on my third pair of lenses (60 bucks each, usually every christmas).
I love my oakleys so much that I wear them whenever I do anything outside, theyre also great for just driving!
Great to hear. Oakley's been producing good polarized glasses for years, and it's nice to see they're finally making them for and focusing on selling them to fishermen.
I love my Oakley Goggles that I use, to ride on my Harley! I found out real quick, that I can use 'em during a bass tournament when I ride with Go-Fast Rick.
My wife won a pair at her company picnic and she won't part with them.
I just wish they made prescription sunglasses ... Go Big O!
Those babies you described, sound as if they are the "Cream of The Crop!
Oakley are really good sunglasses that i have found to be very dependable and sturdy and last a very long time. I ha e two pair and the only reason why is because i lost the first ones in a lake.
How are they compared to Costa Del Mar?
I feel that designer sunglasses are way overrated for the price versus quality. I had a friend who had to get a set of Gargoyles, they claimed that they were bulletproof and cost $350. I told him that I would replace them if they would actually survive being hit with a 22 Long Rifle at 200 yards. Needless to say, the "bulletproof" was "bull----" and he sent them back for a full refund, complete with the hole through the lens. As for polarized sunglasses, I'll stick with the cheap $20.00 or less versions, which spend more time in the glove compartment of my truck than actually on my head or fishing.
Sounds like Oakley did their homework. I still have a pair that survived some cross country bike rides. Good products.
Are they rating certain colors better than others for different fishing environments? Or is that just a brilliant marketing scheme to get people to buy different glasses for lake, stream, and ocean? I tend to just stick with the lightest shade available, usually amber, so that I can use them in low light on smaller rivers.
I love a good pair of glasses, but it is hard for me to shell out the big bucks when one of my kids will inevitably break them within six months.
I like native sunglasses
I wear oakley's but they are a military issue with three lenses. I use the amber lense every time I go out side. They help you see in a variety of light conditions.
I have a lot of problems with Oakley, and of course my husband loves them. It is tough to get most people's prescription into a pair of Oakleys and the company is notorouly difficult to work with. Their warranty is no where as good as it used to be, and as much as my husband loses his sunglasses, it is not worth the money, even at cost. As for scratching - you will have that problem with any plastic or especially polycarbonate (shatter resistant) lens. It comes down to the quality of the scratch coat at that point between the companies. Watch out for the cheap sunglasses - some have very poor optics and don't offer 100% UV protection - but some do. As far as color - grey is the best for not distorting color vision, but most of the time it is your preference which color and density you choose. I have Wiley X for my sporting stuff (balistic, fishing, motorcycle, with interchangeable lenses) - and they have held up well considering how often I knock 'em off my head! Whew-- I need to clock out now!
I have a lot of problems with Oakley, and of course my husband loves them. It is tough to get most people's prescription into a pair of Oakleys and the company is notorouly difficult to work with. Their warranty is no where as good as it used to be, and as much as my husband loses his sunglasses, it is not worth the money, even at cost. As for scratching - you will have that problem with any plastic or especially polycarbonate (shatter resistant) lens. It comes down to the quality of the scratch coat at that point between the companies. Watch out for the cheap sunglasses - some have very poor optics and don't offer 100% UV protection - but some do. As far as color - grey is the best for not distorting color vision, but most of the time it is your preference which color and density you choose. I have Wiley X for my sporting stuff (balistic, fishing, motorcycle, with interchangeable lenses) - and they have held up well considering how often I knock 'em off my head! Whew-- I need to clock out now!
Ooops! Sorry for the double post.
I love my oakleys and actually wear them hunting too but fishing is wear they're my bread and butter.
Mine are the Gascan model in black with polarized lens, you can see them in many of my photos, they were $150 and worth every penny.
Hey Deet, glad to here you "survived" your time in ol' Mexico. Never doubted you would get your permit. I once got permit, had to stand in line at the DMV for like 2 hours, but man it was worth it.
The glasses sound great, definitely Oakley did their homework and got the technology right. I don't think I could ever justify the cost, but if I were a guide that spent days spotting fish I probably could.
Do you think the Shallow blue will be a good tint for trout fishing on streams?
I'm not spending that kind of money on something I'm just gonna sit on and break in a couple of months. I'll go to Wally World and get the sunglass off the rack. They are sleek, stylish and you can break them without shedding a tear. In fact you can break several pair and still enjoy your fishing trip.
I've been wearing Oakley's since high school, and have always loved them. I did make a mistake and get a pair of Costa's last year just for fly fishing, and hate them. So they are collecting dust and my old Oakley's are once again riding on the dash. I can't remember the model they are, but they are polarized with gold lenses.
Hey Wags... I like shallow blue on rivers also. Oakley also has a rose tint that's a good all-arounder. Alex, on comparison to Costas, I also wore Costas in Mex. and they didn't really stack up so well for me.
The brand doesn't matter as much as the quality of the coatings and the warranty service provided by the manufacturer. The high quality coatings resist scratches, bug dope and other abuses. I have owned and destroyed SunCloud, Maui Jims, Ray Ban, Costa del Mar, Reptile, etc. Check out the cost of replacing scratched lenses, arms, and the spring loaded joints before buying. You are going to break and scratch them if you play hard. Like all good quality optics or lenses you will get value from the extra money you spend but warranty and service can save a bunch over the years. Or you can go the "buy 'em and bust 'em" route and not care. (try Croakies instead of sitting on your glasses) If you live in a mountain or marine environment spend the money or go blind later. If the pursuit and capture of fish consumes an unconscionable amount of your time then you probably already enjoy the X-ray vision that any pair of high end glasses that fit you well will give you. If you are unsure about the value remember you only get one set of eyes. I will have to check out the Oakleys.
I guarantee you these will run you over $150.
Check out H2Optix. They have all the aforementioned, technology, but cost a lot less. OK, so maybe they don't have the optically correct radial lens thickness, but you won't notice. I have a couple pairs of Spys (they got to this technology first), they have this lens technology, and my eyes feel just as great when I wear my H2O's as I do with the Spys on.
Both these brands make polarized, equally high tech/quality, and less expensive glasses than Oakley. Oakley just has the name and the marketing. Screw that.
You can get a pair of H2O's on mega discount in Sportsman's Guide. Just saw them in the most recent catalog. Haven't heard of the Guide? Get real, then Google it.
I wear FishGillz Sunglasses exclusively. They are hands down the best fishing sunglasses on the market today. Their lenses have amazing clarity, and the frames are the most comfortable I have ever worn. I have been wearing mine for over a year and they are still like brand new. They only cost $50 which includes a nice acessories package. When I'm fishing on super bright sunny days, I can see several feet under water, better than any other glasses I have ever worn. My wife bought them for me for Christmas and they're the best glasses that I've ever owned.
Post a Comment
Oakley are really good sunglasses that i have found to be very dependable and sturdy and last a very long time. I ha e two pair and the only reason why is because i lost the first ones in a lake.
I will only wear Oakleys. I have custom ordered 5 pair off of thier web site. They HAVE to be polarized, I don't like to have a glare when I'm hunting or fishing. My favorites are th XLJ Half Jackets.
I'd have to saw that Oakley has some of the worst styled sunglasses on the planet. I have been going with Spy or Smith. Keanons and Costas don't fit me right.
smith super method polarzied are around my neck as i type
(can't forget the croakie/lanyard-thingy)
I've been wearing a the same pair of polarized Oakley 5s for three years now... They fit perfect, are very comfortable, and really do enhance things to an HD like view.
My only complaint... They scratch VERY easily, and I'm on my third pair of lenses (60 bucks each, usually every christmas).
I love my oakleys so much that I wear them whenever I do anything outside, theyre also great for just driving!
Great to hear. Oakley's been producing good polarized glasses for years, and it's nice to see they're finally making them for and focusing on selling them to fishermen.
I love my Oakley Goggles that I use, to ride on my Harley! I found out real quick, that I can use 'em during a bass tournament when I ride with Go-Fast Rick.
My wife won a pair at her company picnic and she won't part with them.
I just wish they made prescription sunglasses ... Go Big O!
Those babies you described, sound as if they are the "Cream of The Crop!
How are they compared to Costa Del Mar?
I feel that designer sunglasses are way overrated for the price versus quality. I had a friend who had to get a set of Gargoyles, they claimed that they were bulletproof and cost $350. I told him that I would replace them if they would actually survive being hit with a 22 Long Rifle at 200 yards. Needless to say, the "bulletproof" was "bull----" and he sent them back for a full refund, complete with the hole through the lens. As for polarized sunglasses, I'll stick with the cheap $20.00 or less versions, which spend more time in the glove compartment of my truck than actually on my head or fishing.
Sounds like Oakley did their homework. I still have a pair that survived some cross country bike rides. Good products.
Are they rating certain colors better than others for different fishing environments? Or is that just a brilliant marketing scheme to get people to buy different glasses for lake, stream, and ocean? I tend to just stick with the lightest shade available, usually amber, so that I can use them in low light on smaller rivers.
I love a good pair of glasses, but it is hard for me to shell out the big bucks when one of my kids will inevitably break them within six months.
I like native sunglasses
I wear oakley's but they are a military issue with three lenses. I use the amber lense every time I go out side. They help you see in a variety of light conditions.
I have a lot of problems with Oakley, and of course my husband loves them. It is tough to get most people's prescription into a pair of Oakleys and the company is notorouly difficult to work with. Their warranty is no where as good as it used to be, and as much as my husband loses his sunglasses, it is not worth the money, even at cost. As for scratching - you will have that problem with any plastic or especially polycarbonate (shatter resistant) lens. It comes down to the quality of the scratch coat at that point between the companies. Watch out for the cheap sunglasses - some have very poor optics and don't offer 100% UV protection - but some do. As far as color - grey is the best for not distorting color vision, but most of the time it is your preference which color and density you choose. I have Wiley X for my sporting stuff (balistic, fishing, motorcycle, with interchangeable lenses) - and they have held up well considering how often I knock 'em off my head! Whew-- I need to clock out now!
I have a lot of problems with Oakley, and of course my husband loves them. It is tough to get most people's prescription into a pair of Oakleys and the company is notorouly difficult to work with. Their warranty is no where as good as it used to be, and as much as my husband loses his sunglasses, it is not worth the money, even at cost. As for scratching - you will have that problem with any plastic or especially polycarbonate (shatter resistant) lens. It comes down to the quality of the scratch coat at that point between the companies. Watch out for the cheap sunglasses - some have very poor optics and don't offer 100% UV protection - but some do. As far as color - grey is the best for not distorting color vision, but most of the time it is your preference which color and density you choose. I have Wiley X for my sporting stuff (balistic, fishing, motorcycle, with interchangeable lenses) - and they have held up well considering how often I knock 'em off my head! Whew-- I need to clock out now!
Ooops! Sorry for the double post.
I love my oakleys and actually wear them hunting too but fishing is wear they're my bread and butter.
Mine are the Gascan model in black with polarized lens, you can see them in many of my photos, they were $150 and worth every penny.
Hey Deet, glad to here you "survived" your time in ol' Mexico. Never doubted you would get your permit. I once got permit, had to stand in line at the DMV for like 2 hours, but man it was worth it.
The glasses sound great, definitely Oakley did their homework and got the technology right. I don't think I could ever justify the cost, but if I were a guide that spent days spotting fish I probably could.
Do you think the Shallow blue will be a good tint for trout fishing on streams?
I'm not spending that kind of money on something I'm just gonna sit on and break in a couple of months. I'll go to Wally World and get the sunglass off the rack. They are sleek, stylish and you can break them without shedding a tear. In fact you can break several pair and still enjoy your fishing trip.
I've been wearing Oakley's since high school, and have always loved them. I did make a mistake and get a pair of Costa's last year just for fly fishing, and hate them. So they are collecting dust and my old Oakley's are once again riding on the dash. I can't remember the model they are, but they are polarized with gold lenses.
Hey Wags... I like shallow blue on rivers also. Oakley also has a rose tint that's a good all-arounder. Alex, on comparison to Costas, I also wore Costas in Mex. and they didn't really stack up so well for me.
The brand doesn't matter as much as the quality of the coatings and the warranty service provided by the manufacturer. The high quality coatings resist scratches, bug dope and other abuses. I have owned and destroyed SunCloud, Maui Jims, Ray Ban, Costa del Mar, Reptile, etc. Check out the cost of replacing scratched lenses, arms, and the spring loaded joints before buying. You are going to break and scratch them if you play hard. Like all good quality optics or lenses you will get value from the extra money you spend but warranty and service can save a bunch over the years. Or you can go the "buy 'em and bust 'em" route and not care. (try Croakies instead of sitting on your glasses) If you live in a mountain or marine environment spend the money or go blind later. If the pursuit and capture of fish consumes an unconscionable amount of your time then you probably already enjoy the X-ray vision that any pair of high end glasses that fit you well will give you. If you are unsure about the value remember you only get one set of eyes. I will have to check out the Oakleys.
I guarantee you these will run you over $150.
Check out H2Optix. They have all the aforementioned, technology, but cost a lot less. OK, so maybe they don't have the optically correct radial lens thickness, but you won't notice. I have a couple pairs of Spys (they got to this technology first), they have this lens technology, and my eyes feel just as great when I wear my H2O's as I do with the Spys on.
Both these brands make polarized, equally high tech/quality, and less expensive glasses than Oakley. Oakley just has the name and the marketing. Screw that.
You can get a pair of H2O's on mega discount in Sportsman's Guide. Just saw them in the most recent catalog. Haven't heard of the Guide? Get real, then Google it.
I wear FishGillz Sunglasses exclusively. They are hands down the best fishing sunglasses on the market today. Their lenses have amazing clarity, and the frames are the most comfortable I have ever worn. I have been wearing mine for over a year and they are still like brand new. They only cost $50 which includes a nice acessories package. When I'm fishing on super bright sunny days, I can see several feet under water, better than any other glasses I have ever worn. My wife bought them for me for Christmas and they're the best glasses that I've ever owned.
Post a Comment