


March 19, 2009
Wisconsin Hunters Hot Over Last Fall’s Harvest
By Dave Hurteau
From the Wisconsin State Journal:
The world’s teetering on depression . . . yet state lawmakers will soon hold three hearings so those who endured a “very disappointing and unproductive season” can condemn the 2008 deer hunts that registered 453,000 whitetails. . . .
As lawmakers enable this low-grade form of mass hysteria, they should quietly chant: “We shot enough deer to fill Lambeau Field 6.5 times last fall. The 2008 seasons rank No. 10 in state history. . . .”
Even so, folks are fuming . . . .
Check out the full story and tell us your reaction.
Comments (24)
It is strange to picture so many thousands of dead deer propped in the seats at Lambeau field. I disagree with this practice :)
Before you Comment, you should click on the link and read the entire article. We need to trust science and the Biologists in the DNR or your local state game commissions, at least some of the time. I think the outrage here is partly because of the Earn-a-Buck program, and specific WMU's that had poor numbers. Weather may have contributed too. The Harvest was # 10 in state history, with all 10 being since 1994. It's not uncommon for hunters to distrust the Game Commission, and sometimes rightfully so, but I think it's cliche for some older or crotchety hunters to blame a poor season personally on the DNR. Try looking in the mirror.
It could be any number of reasons, but maybe it was higher deer numbers? All i know is most of the whole upper midwest experienced a similar opening day, which was cold and rainy.
Nate
Cold and rainy opening day explains a lackluster season. Same thing in PA
There are a number of factors that come into play here. Deer taken in the entire state may be leveled off, however, like the article reads the deer were in shorter supply in a V-shaped section starting from Wisconsin’s midsection going north. Wolves have become very prevalant in north woods and they are migrating further and further south as the deer herd is pushed into the southern half of the state. Most hunters from the populated parts of Wisconsin do travel north and in the northwoods is where people are outraged by the DNR figures because there has been a significant decline in the past 4 or 5 years. Statewide maybe the numbers are the same but the people who live in the northwoods who cherish deer season are the ones affected most by all of the DNR regulations.
I was in Wisconsin for Opening day this year, and it was not rainy, but was cold. The outrage from most hunters is the lack of deer they are seeing, and also with the method the DNR uses to estimate the deer herd. The DNR has been over estimating the deer herd drastically and under estimating the bear numbers. Since the number of deer were over estimated, areas where kept as EAB for longer than necessary to reduce the deer herd in that area. So over the last couple of years hunters shot additional does then they normally would have so they could get their buck tag, and now their are far fewer deer in certain areas, which is not necessarily bad, but the hunters were used to seeing a certain amount of deer per day and now might not see any deer at all, or very few over the course of the week.
It is a problem with guestimations... they are over-estimating the deer population while under-estimating the preadtors that kill them. Hunters are probably pissed at that and also the number of deer they have been seeing. Either there are not that many deer or a lot of them are becomign nocturnal.
MB,
Very similar to what's been going on in PA last several years except there is no earn-a-buck. For the same reasons you mention PGC changed the rules, seasons and doe permit allocations resulting in hunters killing more deer (does) several years in a row. Now, the herd is healthier albeit less numerous. Hunters see fewer deer and are outraged. Antler restrictions, 3 or 4 pts per side, depending on unit, mean hunters who perennially killed bucks (many spikes and forkies) now are unsuccessful. I can sympathise, it sucks to not fill your tag. Personally i have had great success and killed better bucks since the restrictions were put in place, but as a whole we (camp) kill fewer but better bucks. We do not have the wolves or CWD to deal with so that also is taken into DNR's gameplan in WI. All we can do is hope next season is better than the last.
Not much mention regarding CWD, one of the reasons behind culling the herd in some areas.
I didn't hear a lot of complaints in PA this year. Deer are plentiful in the eastern part of the state as always with bigger bucks every year since the restrictions. Camp is out in the northcentral part of the state and all three of us who got out for the opener took deer, two nice bucks and a large doe. I thought this year was odd mostly because almost all hunters I talked to have taken a deer or helped a buddy drag one out over the course of the seasons.
jcarlin,
You got me, i was speaking mostly about the past few years. This year we had a decent archery season with a few nice bucks killed and many sighted. Because of an infant at home, and the fact that i was tagged out, I was at camp only Sunday and Monday of rifle. We had 2 decent bucks down then, on public land in 2G. Second week was not as productive as normal though.
Steve,
I also hunted in PA last year. Alwasy try to go up for 3-4 days of bowhunting in November. Have only done it the last two years so not sure what the number of deer sightings beforehand where, but I hunt on public land up there and over the last two years, of seven total days of hunting I have seen 11 different bucks(4 shooters in regards to AR) and just 5 does. Anywhere else I have hunted, I never seen more bucks than does so I believe that a lot of does were wiped out. While I do find it weird I do not see a lot of does, I am not complaining with seeing plenty of bucks, regardless if they are not legal.
MB, i bowhunted in 2G two and a half days this year. Usually i get in about 4-6 like you. I saw 2 does and 3 shooter bucks in 5 sits. Not many deer but 3 shooters is good by me when i used to go a whole season w/o seeing a buck. I took a 6 point this year, because he presented a shot, but saw better. Last year i took a decent 8 archery hunting, and missed a better one the day before. I saw several nice bucks during rifle while bird-dogging for the rest of the guys. 3 years ago i took a nice 10 the last day of the season. I'm happy with the hunting in PA, but there are a lot of people who arent was my point. I have shot 5 or 6 bucks in PA since the antler restrictions( 8 years?). Not bad considering the limited time i get there. Before that, i was not nearly as successful, saw plenty of deer(does) though.
I strongly agree that its the DNR here in WI that is causing so much uproar. Think about all the turmoil that has come off of CWD and how the DNR took care of that: kill,kill,kill!
Plus, every year, they respond to questions concerning the deer population with the same answer: kill,kill,kill!
But, the funny part to this is, that for every sentence spoke about cutting down herds or any type of herd control period, there are paragraphs being spoken on all the "new" laws and regulations that will enable us to kill them.
Im not sure the DNR here has its head on straight, or at least its not tightend down all the way. I for one ahve been to SEVERAL meetings and seminars, envolving the WI DNR, and I can tell you this much....
They dodge questions faster then Barry Sanders on a runback! Its terrible!
It seems the only thing we have to really rely on is science and hopefully it can find a way to get things back to the norm a little.
Steve182.
I sympathize with you. I've been managing to get out for archery at least a couple of days a year but between school, little ones, and work this year was my first out for the rifle opener in a couple of years. I do recall a couple of single digit temps and downpours in the years prior to that streak. I stayed out all day on those, but sitings were down all around. Bowhunt 5C as I'm in the north of Montgomery County and for rifle season I'm out in 2G just outside of Ridgeway.
I need to live somewhere where there are more deer. :{)
Mike D, Move to Northern Missouri. Theres a reason Kirksville was at the top of th F&S list.
The fact is the DNR is counting how many deer are killed and using that information to project the population. People will still kill deer, however, unlike 5 years ago you shoot 1 out of the 20 per year you saw, now, you are shooting the only one that comes around. The DNR stat stays the same. The hunters are mad because they want to see the abundance of deer in the woods and not be so inclined to shoot at the first brown they see knowing it could very well be the last brown they see because of the guy hunting on the property next door being in the same position.
And forget about encouraging trophy management. The earn-a-buck in Wisconsin has become more of a race to slaughter. A doe shows up at 6:30 in the morning opening morning, doesn't matter if you're out looking for a buck or not, if the qualifications for being able to shoot the buck of your dreams means you have to blast a fawn or a less desirable deer, people do it. Defeats the entire premise of the sport - you're no longer a hunter, you're a population management engineer - blast away. The next thing the DNR in WI will make us do is catch and kill a carp so we can fish for walleye.
I think that some of the outrage may come because many feel that the Wisconsin DNR over manages everything. I moved away several years ago but still have many friends and family that hunt there. In recent years they have had an eratication zone to combat cronic wasting. They have had many extra earn a buck and antlerless only hunts. People are forced to shoot small deer that they may normally let go. This may be leading to a lower quality heard. Many feel that the insurance lobby is pushing to lower the heard to reduce the number of vehicle/deer accident claims. Others feel that eraticating the heard in certain area's is dangerous. Now hunters are seeing the effects of these programs. Sure the overall kill may be up but the heard is full of more immature deer that hunters are forced to harvest just to get a chance at a buck. Or if they live in some area's the deer heard has been devestated by such practices. In addition, the state is constantly dipping into funds gathered by licenses and fees and diverting those monies to other programs. For instance the price of a Pheasant stamp is supposed to go toward stocking and habitat maintenance yet every year fewer and fewer Pheasants are stocked in fewer and fewer locations. I would say there is without a doubt a distrust of the WI DNR among the citizens of the state. It is one thing to trust gov't agencies but that does not mean that citizens shouldn't continue to question them and hold them accountable.
the area i hunted in my home state for a few years went through the cronic wasting solution of a large deer slaughter a few years ago resulting in a lot less deer and is just now rebounding. i hunted another area last year and we had such warm weather it killed us for both deer and elk. sometimes you have a bad season or two. but look at the miami dolphins. hopefully, like them we can make a come back soon.
well, the season wasnt unproductive for me. I got 3 last year and earned my buck for next year. and if it wouldntve been for the earn a buck. i would have a ten pointer. but it was the best season ive ever had
I think the DNR needs to look at more than the number of deer killed state wide. I live in Buffalo County and it has been miserable. I hunted over 30 nights last season and saw only 9 deer, two with antlers. I was lucky enough to arrow a big 9 pointer. With that said the DNR would count that as a successful season. If I weren't so dang hard headed I would have gave up on my land after 10 nights. The numbers don't always tell the whole story. I have friends that work at Outfitters and they can't even get their clients a shot at a doe much less harvest a doe for an opportunity to shoot a buck. They depend on this to make a living, how many times will anyone pay a few thousand dollars to come to Wisconsin to sit for 4-7 days without and opportunity to shoot a deer. The herd in Buffalo County is definitely feeling the wrath of several years of EAB. It needs to stop immediately.
In Wisconsin there is way too many people will only shoot Bucks and not control the herd by shooting does.
Post a Comment
I was in Wisconsin for Opening day this year, and it was not rainy, but was cold. The outrage from most hunters is the lack of deer they are seeing, and also with the method the DNR uses to estimate the deer herd. The DNR has been over estimating the deer herd drastically and under estimating the bear numbers. Since the number of deer were over estimated, areas where kept as EAB for longer than necessary to reduce the deer herd in that area. So over the last couple of years hunters shot additional does then they normally would have so they could get their buck tag, and now their are far fewer deer in certain areas, which is not necessarily bad, but the hunters were used to seeing a certain amount of deer per day and now might not see any deer at all, or very few over the course of the week.
I strongly agree that its the DNR here in WI that is causing so much uproar. Think about all the turmoil that has come off of CWD and how the DNR took care of that: kill,kill,kill!
Plus, every year, they respond to questions concerning the deer population with the same answer: kill,kill,kill!
But, the funny part to this is, that for every sentence spoke about cutting down herds or any type of herd control period, there are paragraphs being spoken on all the "new" laws and regulations that will enable us to kill them.
Im not sure the DNR here has its head on straight, or at least its not tightend down all the way. I for one ahve been to SEVERAL meetings and seminars, envolving the WI DNR, and I can tell you this much....
They dodge questions faster then Barry Sanders on a runback! Its terrible!
It seems the only thing we have to really rely on is science and hopefully it can find a way to get things back to the norm a little.
I didn't hear a lot of complaints in PA this year. Deer are plentiful in the eastern part of the state as always with bigger bucks every year since the restrictions. Camp is out in the northcentral part of the state and all three of us who got out for the opener took deer, two nice bucks and a large doe. I thought this year was odd mostly because almost all hunters I talked to have taken a deer or helped a buddy drag one out over the course of the seasons.
Steve,
I also hunted in PA last year. Alwasy try to go up for 3-4 days of bowhunting in November. Have only done it the last two years so not sure what the number of deer sightings beforehand where, but I hunt on public land up there and over the last two years, of seven total days of hunting I have seen 11 different bucks(4 shooters in regards to AR) and just 5 does. Anywhere else I have hunted, I never seen more bucks than does so I believe that a lot of does were wiped out. While I do find it weird I do not see a lot of does, I am not complaining with seeing plenty of bucks, regardless if they are not legal.
The fact is the DNR is counting how many deer are killed and using that information to project the population. People will still kill deer, however, unlike 5 years ago you shoot 1 out of the 20 per year you saw, now, you are shooting the only one that comes around. The DNR stat stays the same. The hunters are mad because they want to see the abundance of deer in the woods and not be so inclined to shoot at the first brown they see knowing it could very well be the last brown they see because of the guy hunting on the property next door being in the same position.
I think that some of the outrage may come because many feel that the Wisconsin DNR over manages everything. I moved away several years ago but still have many friends and family that hunt there. In recent years they have had an eratication zone to combat cronic wasting. They have had many extra earn a buck and antlerless only hunts. People are forced to shoot small deer that they may normally let go. This may be leading to a lower quality heard. Many feel that the insurance lobby is pushing to lower the heard to reduce the number of vehicle/deer accident claims. Others feel that eraticating the heard in certain area's is dangerous. Now hunters are seeing the effects of these programs. Sure the overall kill may be up but the heard is full of more immature deer that hunters are forced to harvest just to get a chance at a buck. Or if they live in some area's the deer heard has been devestated by such practices. In addition, the state is constantly dipping into funds gathered by licenses and fees and diverting those monies to other programs. For instance the price of a Pheasant stamp is supposed to go toward stocking and habitat maintenance yet every year fewer and fewer Pheasants are stocked in fewer and fewer locations. I would say there is without a doubt a distrust of the WI DNR among the citizens of the state. It is one thing to trust gov't agencies but that does not mean that citizens shouldn't continue to question them and hold them accountable.
Cold and rainy opening day explains a lackluster season. Same thing in PA
There are a number of factors that come into play here. Deer taken in the entire state may be leveled off, however, like the article reads the deer were in shorter supply in a V-shaped section starting from Wisconsin’s midsection going north. Wolves have become very prevalant in north woods and they are migrating further and further south as the deer herd is pushed into the southern half of the state. Most hunters from the populated parts of Wisconsin do travel north and in the northwoods is where people are outraged by the DNR figures because there has been a significant decline in the past 4 or 5 years. Statewide maybe the numbers are the same but the people who live in the northwoods who cherish deer season are the ones affected most by all of the DNR regulations.
MB,
Very similar to what's been going on in PA last several years except there is no earn-a-buck. For the same reasons you mention PGC changed the rules, seasons and doe permit allocations resulting in hunters killing more deer (does) several years in a row. Now, the herd is healthier albeit less numerous. Hunters see fewer deer and are outraged. Antler restrictions, 3 or 4 pts per side, depending on unit, mean hunters who perennially killed bucks (many spikes and forkies) now are unsuccessful. I can sympathise, it sucks to not fill your tag. Personally i have had great success and killed better bucks since the restrictions were put in place, but as a whole we (camp) kill fewer but better bucks. We do not have the wolves or CWD to deal with so that also is taken into DNR's gameplan in WI. All we can do is hope next season is better than the last.
Not much mention regarding CWD, one of the reasons behind culling the herd in some areas.
jcarlin,
You got me, i was speaking mostly about the past few years. This year we had a decent archery season with a few nice bucks killed and many sighted. Because of an infant at home, and the fact that i was tagged out, I was at camp only Sunday and Monday of rifle. We had 2 decent bucks down then, on public land in 2G. Second week was not as productive as normal though.
MB, i bowhunted in 2G two and a half days this year. Usually i get in about 4-6 like you. I saw 2 does and 3 shooter bucks in 5 sits. Not many deer but 3 shooters is good by me when i used to go a whole season w/o seeing a buck. I took a 6 point this year, because he presented a shot, but saw better. Last year i took a decent 8 archery hunting, and missed a better one the day before. I saw several nice bucks during rifle while bird-dogging for the rest of the guys. 3 years ago i took a nice 10 the last day of the season. I'm happy with the hunting in PA, but there are a lot of people who arent was my point. I have shot 5 or 6 bucks in PA since the antler restrictions( 8 years?). Not bad considering the limited time i get there. Before that, i was not nearly as successful, saw plenty of deer(does) though.
Steve182.
I sympathize with you. I've been managing to get out for archery at least a couple of days a year but between school, little ones, and work this year was my first out for the rifle opener in a couple of years. I do recall a couple of single digit temps and downpours in the years prior to that streak. I stayed out all day on those, but sitings were down all around. Bowhunt 5C as I'm in the north of Montgomery County and for rifle season I'm out in 2G just outside of Ridgeway.
I need to live somewhere where there are more deer. :{)
And forget about encouraging trophy management. The earn-a-buck in Wisconsin has become more of a race to slaughter. A doe shows up at 6:30 in the morning opening morning, doesn't matter if you're out looking for a buck or not, if the qualifications for being able to shoot the buck of your dreams means you have to blast a fawn or a less desirable deer, people do it. Defeats the entire premise of the sport - you're no longer a hunter, you're a population management engineer - blast away. The next thing the DNR in WI will make us do is catch and kill a carp so we can fish for walleye.
well, the season wasnt unproductive for me. I got 3 last year and earned my buck for next year. and if it wouldntve been for the earn a buck. i would have a ten pointer. but it was the best season ive ever had
It is strange to picture so many thousands of dead deer propped in the seats at Lambeau field. I disagree with this practice :)
Before you Comment, you should click on the link and read the entire article. We need to trust science and the Biologists in the DNR or your local state game commissions, at least some of the time. I think the outrage here is partly because of the Earn-a-Buck program, and specific WMU's that had poor numbers. Weather may have contributed too. The Harvest was # 10 in state history, with all 10 being since 1994. It's not uncommon for hunters to distrust the Game Commission, and sometimes rightfully so, but I think it's cliche for some older or crotchety hunters to blame a poor season personally on the DNR. Try looking in the mirror.
It could be any number of reasons, but maybe it was higher deer numbers? All i know is most of the whole upper midwest experienced a similar opening day, which was cold and rainy.
Nate
It is a problem with guestimations... they are over-estimating the deer population while under-estimating the preadtors that kill them. Hunters are probably pissed at that and also the number of deer they have been seeing. Either there are not that many deer or a lot of them are becomign nocturnal.
Mike D, Move to Northern Missouri. Theres a reason Kirksville was at the top of th F&S list.
the area i hunted in my home state for a few years went through the cronic wasting solution of a large deer slaughter a few years ago resulting in a lot less deer and is just now rebounding. i hunted another area last year and we had such warm weather it killed us for both deer and elk. sometimes you have a bad season or two. but look at the miami dolphins. hopefully, like them we can make a come back soon.
I think the DNR needs to look at more than the number of deer killed state wide. I live in Buffalo County and it has been miserable. I hunted over 30 nights last season and saw only 9 deer, two with antlers. I was lucky enough to arrow a big 9 pointer. With that said the DNR would count that as a successful season. If I weren't so dang hard headed I would have gave up on my land after 10 nights. The numbers don't always tell the whole story. I have friends that work at Outfitters and they can't even get their clients a shot at a doe much less harvest a doe for an opportunity to shoot a buck. They depend on this to make a living, how many times will anyone pay a few thousand dollars to come to Wisconsin to sit for 4-7 days without and opportunity to shoot a deer. The herd in Buffalo County is definitely feeling the wrath of several years of EAB. It needs to stop immediately.
In Wisconsin there is way too many people will only shoot Bucks and not control the herd by shooting does.
Post a Comment