


May 22, 2012
A Deer Hunter May Be First to Tag a Minnesota Timber Wolf
By Scott Bestul

The first Minnesota timber wolf killed during a regulated hunting season may fall to a deer hunter. According to this story in the Brainerd Dispatch, the DNR is taking public comment on a proposed two-part wolf season, with the first hunt coinciding with the deer opener on Nov. 3. The second season—which will include both hunting and trapping—will take reopen in late November and close in mid-January, unless a quota of 400 wolves is reached earlier.
This fall’s wolf season will be the first in Minnesota’s history. Prior to 1974, when timber wolves were placed on the endangered species list, wolves were an unprotected species. Unlike the other Great Lakes and western states, wolves were never extirpated from Minnesota, and current estimates place the population at around 3,000 animals. Federal damage control trappers have consistently removed an average of 170 wolves annually.
The DNR’s proposed season—which it calls “very conservative”—calls for 6,000 licenses split between the two hunts. Both residents and nonresidents are eligible to apply for a hunting tag, with proposed fees at $30 and $250, respectively. Nonresident hunting licenses will be limited to 5 percent of the total, or 300 tags. Only residents will be allowed to trap or snare wolves during the second season.
I view this hunt as a huge and important milestone for midwestern wolf management, as well as Minnesota sportsmen and residents. I’ve always been a little confounded that our state has not been allowed to manage a wolf population that has been thriving for many years, and I’ve talked to federal trappers who’ve noted that they’ve removed (read “euthanized”) as many as 200 wolves in a single season here.
This is a waste of an incredible resource, and the fact that Minnesota hunters and trappers can now help regulate the harvest of this fantastic predator finally puts things right. Hopefully, Wisconsin and Michigan (where reintroduced wolves are also thriving) will follow the Minnesota DNR’s lead and model a season that will allow sportsman a chance to harvest surplus animals and, perhaps more importantly, give farmers at least some buy-in to managing wolf numbers. Finally, the return of wolf management to these states can hopefully serve as an example that the Endangered Species Act has its success stories, too.
Comments (18)
I'm a Minnesota resident and think a timber wolf hunting season this fall is a good idea. Wolves have a right to exist in their indigenous areas in northern Minnesota. We should also be allowed to legally hunt them to keep populations at more manageable levels.
Ok ... the population is estimated at 3,000 but 6,000 tags are going to be issued. I know not everyone is going to punch a tag ... but that seems a bit strange to me.
It's about time.
rminard...The DNR has been open about expecting a very low success rate during the hunt somewhere in the range of 5-10%. Based on the cap of 400, it may take 6000 hunter to get there. I imaging a lot of hunters in the northern section of the state will simply apply for a tag to have in their pocket in case a wolf walks near their stand during deer season and will not specifically target wolves.
I figure the wolves will be very skittish during deer gun season.
is there an open coyote season in minnesto?
outdorjunky i don't know if there is an official season but they are not a regulated game animal and people usually go hunting them in the winter. They have actually been showing up in the twin cities, some think that the wolves are pushing them further south.
as for having the hunting season start with the firearms opener, I am not sure how I feel about it. One of the big arguments against that was that the pelt was not in its best condition. If this is true (as I have no real idea about when pelts are best, I don't trap) I think that it is a little disrespectful to the wolf. On the other hand I have heard a couple of stories of hunters getting their deer taken by wolves so I guess it is a wash.
As a Minnesotan I have no problem with this but all of the media coverage that it is getting has the entire animal rights groups up in arms over it. What many of those groups fail to recognize is that hunters and outdoors men in general have helped fund the recovery of the wolves through licensing fees and such. I don't hunt up north but I know plenty of people that do and this will help return the population to a healthy level. Kudos to the MN DNR.
My guess is the later season will be the better hunt. The opening day circus should have every wolf hunkered down. We have been getting trail camera photos for three years about 60mi south of Duluth but no one has laid an eye on one.
I'm pretty sure I will buy a tag. I think most will fall to baiting if they allow it. I have heard that you can call them in especially if they haven't been hunted much. That might make for some post deer season fun.
Northenminn, I'm sure the DNR recognizes that the pelts will not be prime and in fact many may not be any good. But the objective is to limit the numbers. Hunters who take them at that time will likely (hopefully) understand that too. Culling sometimes involves waste but it that's what needs to be done then we have to accept it. The federal trappers are undoubtedly taking the animals at any time of the year when they become a problem and doubtless many of those wolves go to "waste" too. This is simply a matter of shifting the culling from government agents to paying customers. Makes sense to me. I applaud the Minnesota DNR for taking such a cautious and thoughtful approach to this. Some of what happened when wolf hunting was opened in the West was a bit more shot-from-the-hip.
I hunt w central MN...no wolves....but lots of yotes....we usually get one each season....but shoot at everyone we see....they are a nuisance....know folks who hunt N MN and wolves have been much more prevelant....will be good to harvest some...make great rugs, from the ones I have seen inthe past..
Couple quick points...The DNR estimates there are around 3000 wolves in MN. Some biologists have speculated recently that this number is much higher in the 5000 range.
Second if you have a chance it's very interesting to talk to anyone who hunted wolves in MN prior to 1974. At that time they were trying to eradicate wolves via trapping, poisoning, shooting them from airplanes. It didn't work. This new hunting season will no doubt result in a couple hundred wolves being taken for the first couple years. But when they realize they're being targeted they will just disappear just like before.
with the low success rate for wolf hunters, they should have done this years ago!
wolves were not re-introduced to wisconsin.
once they got here from minnesota they were trapped and moved around particularily in the national forests
MNHunter - good point and that is what I figured, but what happens if the 400 cap is hit? How will the other 5,600 tags be notified they won't be able to fill? I might be overthinking this, but just curious on it all.
I can only hope Michigan will follow suit! We used to have Deer Tags along with a complementary Bear tag in the 60's and early 70's.
I would like to take a wolf. They are not legal game here. I have been seeing them here in Louisiana since I was a teenager, some from as close as thirty feet away. I have a picture of one on my trail camera from last year. Up until he appeared on camera all I had seen was his tracks. Coyotes take a distant back seat to these big fellows.
@rminard The DNR plans to notify the hunters via the media (e-mail, text, television, etc.)
This article doesn't do too great of a good answering all the questions everyone is curious about... check out Minnesota's DNR site. They have plenty of information on the topic.
Post a Comment
I'm a Minnesota resident and think a timber wolf hunting season this fall is a good idea. Wolves have a right to exist in their indigenous areas in northern Minnesota. We should also be allowed to legally hunt them to keep populations at more manageable levels.
It's about time.
rminard...The DNR has been open about expecting a very low success rate during the hunt somewhere in the range of 5-10%. Based on the cap of 400, it may take 6000 hunter to get there. I imaging a lot of hunters in the northern section of the state will simply apply for a tag to have in their pocket in case a wolf walks near their stand during deer season and will not specifically target wolves.
As a Minnesotan I have no problem with this but all of the media coverage that it is getting has the entire animal rights groups up in arms over it. What many of those groups fail to recognize is that hunters and outdoors men in general have helped fund the recovery of the wolves through licensing fees and such. I don't hunt up north but I know plenty of people that do and this will help return the population to a healthy level. Kudos to the MN DNR.
Couple quick points...The DNR estimates there are around 3000 wolves in MN. Some biologists have speculated recently that this number is much higher in the 5000 range.
Second if you have a chance it's very interesting to talk to anyone who hunted wolves in MN prior to 1974. At that time they were trying to eradicate wolves via trapping, poisoning, shooting them from airplanes. It didn't work. This new hunting season will no doubt result in a couple hundred wolves being taken for the first couple years. But when they realize they're being targeted they will just disappear just like before.
with the low success rate for wolf hunters, they should have done this years ago!
outdorjunky i don't know if there is an official season but they are not a regulated game animal and people usually go hunting them in the winter. They have actually been showing up in the twin cities, some think that the wolves are pushing them further south.
as for having the hunting season start with the firearms opener, I am not sure how I feel about it. One of the big arguments against that was that the pelt was not in its best condition. If this is true (as I have no real idea about when pelts are best, I don't trap) I think that it is a little disrespectful to the wolf. On the other hand I have heard a couple of stories of hunters getting their deer taken by wolves so I guess it is a wash.
My guess is the later season will be the better hunt. The opening day circus should have every wolf hunkered down. We have been getting trail camera photos for three years about 60mi south of Duluth but no one has laid an eye on one.
I'm pretty sure I will buy a tag. I think most will fall to baiting if they allow it. I have heard that you can call them in especially if they haven't been hunted much. That might make for some post deer season fun.
wolves were not re-introduced to wisconsin.
once they got here from minnesota they were trapped and moved around particularily in the national forests
I can only hope Michigan will follow suit! We used to have Deer Tags along with a complementary Bear tag in the 60's and early 70's.
Ok ... the population is estimated at 3,000 but 6,000 tags are going to be issued. I know not everyone is going to punch a tag ... but that seems a bit strange to me.
I figure the wolves will be very skittish during deer gun season.
is there an open coyote season in minnesto?
Northenminn, I'm sure the DNR recognizes that the pelts will not be prime and in fact many may not be any good. But the objective is to limit the numbers. Hunters who take them at that time will likely (hopefully) understand that too. Culling sometimes involves waste but it that's what needs to be done then we have to accept it. The federal trappers are undoubtedly taking the animals at any time of the year when they become a problem and doubtless many of those wolves go to "waste" too. This is simply a matter of shifting the culling from government agents to paying customers. Makes sense to me. I applaud the Minnesota DNR for taking such a cautious and thoughtful approach to this. Some of what happened when wolf hunting was opened in the West was a bit more shot-from-the-hip.
I hunt w central MN...no wolves....but lots of yotes....we usually get one each season....but shoot at everyone we see....they are a nuisance....know folks who hunt N MN and wolves have been much more prevelant....will be good to harvest some...make great rugs, from the ones I have seen inthe past..
MNHunter - good point and that is what I figured, but what happens if the 400 cap is hit? How will the other 5,600 tags be notified they won't be able to fill? I might be overthinking this, but just curious on it all.
I would like to take a wolf. They are not legal game here. I have been seeing them here in Louisiana since I was a teenager, some from as close as thirty feet away. I have a picture of one on my trail camera from last year. Up until he appeared on camera all I had seen was his tracks. Coyotes take a distant back seat to these big fellows.
@rminard The DNR plans to notify the hunters via the media (e-mail, text, television, etc.)
This article doesn't do too great of a good answering all the questions everyone is curious about... check out Minnesota's DNR site. They have plenty of information on the topic.
Post a Comment