Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Announcements

Remington Opts to Stay in New York State & Expand Operations After Getting $80m Govt Contract

Uploaded on April 12, 2013

I guess money was an issue with Remington. What are your thoughts?

This story seems to have managed to stay in the local NY media until now.

According to a report from Albany Watch, Despite concerns from local officials and residents that the Remington Arms plant in the Mohawk Valley could close or move because of New York’s tough gun-control law, the company is actually looking to expand its existing plant, the Associated Press reported, citing local media reports.

Local lawmakers apparently talked to Remington about its $20 million expansion. The company has received $5.5 million in state incentives over the past five years.

NY Congressman Richard Hanna released the following statement on his website:

UTICA, N.Y. – U.S. Representative Richard Hanna today announced that Remington Arms has been awarded a nearly $80 million contract to produce more than 5,000 sniper rifles for the U.S. military. The work will be done in Ilion by Mohawk Valley employees.

The federal contract comes from the Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), a division of the U.S. Department of Defense. The contract will be awarded over the course of 10 years.

“The award of this contract to Remington Defense further shows that they are the premier manufacturer of sniper rifles for our Armed Forces,” Rep. Hanna said. “I have full confidence that this contract will be fulfilled with the high quality and standards that define our Ilion workforce. I fully support Remington Arms and will continue working to ensure that the company and its dedicated employees can thrive in Herkimer County for generations to come.”

This contract and the fact that Remington opted to fulfill it in NY will mean the anti gun state of New York will enjoy tens of millions of dollars of positive economic impact over the next several years from Remington and its employees.

Many gun companies are refusing to do business with law enforcement or the governments of anti gun states.

Some companies are even taking the step of moving their operations completely out of anti gun states.

It would seem Remington has opted to do the opposite.

Remington is owned by the massive investment company, Freedom Group, who also owns Marlin, DPMS, Para, Bushmaster and several other gun manufacturers.

Top Rated
All Replies
from Egg wrote 7 weeks 3 days ago

Remington will not be the household name that they used to be, however, political chicanery, bribery, and the power of the bartered buck could force any manufacturer (who is licensed by the government) to provide for said government. I'll assume that politics and providing firearms to the government are not unfamiliar bedfellows.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from allegnmtn wrote 7 weeks 3 days ago

Remington motivated only by money? Government "incentives" thrown in to seal the deal? I'm not surprised at all. Your tax dollars at work...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 7 weeks 2 days ago

You'd do well to read Outdoor life's recent article on this subject, (companies considering moving)...seems the vast majority had made up their minds to stay put regardless of a particular state's firearm ownership laws.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 6 weeks 4 days ago

Most of them ,including Beretta next door to me in Md., when they get $80 million dollars and more helps to make up their mind regardless of the laws. Like everything else money drives everything over principals.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from oakwood phantom wrote 6 weeks 4 days ago

Does "Remmington" have any say whatsoever in this matter? They are owned by a conclomerate. Do they even really exist as a company other than in name?
Out of principal I would love to see all arms, ammo and other industry related companies abandon hypocrytical anti gun states. But doing so is no easy matter. And what about the employees who can't move if their job did?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

from Egg wrote 7 weeks 3 days ago

Remington will not be the household name that they used to be, however, political chicanery, bribery, and the power of the bartered buck could force any manufacturer (who is licensed by the government) to provide for said government. I'll assume that politics and providing firearms to the government are not unfamiliar bedfellows.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from allegnmtn wrote 7 weeks 3 days ago

Remington motivated only by money? Government "incentives" thrown in to seal the deal? I'm not surprised at all. Your tax dollars at work...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 7 weeks 2 days ago

You'd do well to read Outdoor life's recent article on this subject, (companies considering moving)...seems the vast majority had made up their minds to stay put regardless of a particular state's firearm ownership laws.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 6 weeks 4 days ago

Most of them ,including Beretta next door to me in Md., when they get $80 million dollars and more helps to make up their mind regardless of the laws. Like everything else money drives everything over principals.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from oakwood phantom wrote 6 weeks 4 days ago

Does "Remmington" have any say whatsoever in this matter? They are owned by a conclomerate. Do they even really exist as a company other than in name?
Out of principal I would love to see all arms, ammo and other industry related companies abandon hypocrytical anti gun states. But doing so is no easy matter. And what about the employees who can't move if their job did?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

bmxbiz-fs