Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

PrinterPrint EMail Email Share This Icon Share

Message Boards

Rate This Thread100%0%

Announcements

Wolf hunting Good? or Bad?

Uploaded on August 25, 2009

What is your position on the new plans on managing the wolf population in Idaho and Montana?

Top Rated
All Replies
from pawner wrote 12 weeks 2 days ago

I think they should be captured and relocated. Definitely not killed!

-13 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 12 weeks 2 days ago

Sure, I would like to have a woff-woff rug.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunt_Hard wrote 12 weeks 2 days ago

My opinion on this subject is that the wolf population should be managed, by doing exactly what Fish & Game of Montana and Idaho are doing. Which is giving a quota that is about 25% of the states wolf population, which in the end turns out good because the next years pups will re-fill the spots of the ones harvested in the prior year. If the management is done right it should keep the wolf population around the same number for years.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from 175rltw wrote 12 weeks 1 day ago

GET ADDICTED_ SMOKE A PACK A DAY!! Yeah seriously, If they don't get hunted legitimately then they will become a huge problem in rural residential areas (this is already happening) and paoching and other irresponsiblee and unregulated forms of reprisal against them will dramatically threaten the populations and all the "goos" done with this restoration will be jeopardized

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from swilmot1 wrote 12 weeks 1 day ago

Why Should Wolf hunting be any different then coyote hunting? If the population is abundant enough to hunt they should be managed or it will start effecting other animal populations

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 12 weeks 1 day ago

Its about time

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from peter wrote 12 weeks 5 hours ago

theve got to do it. wolves have been recovered for a long time

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOHN ANDERSON wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

EXCELLENT!! question swilmot1.We bought our tags tuesday .

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

I say hunting is a good way to manage the population. Most hunters become protective of the game they hunt, so they will become more eyes and ears out in the field. think about deer hunters and how most would react to a poacher or destruction of habitat.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from peter wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

pawner, do u know the cost it would be to capture them woles, and besides half would die when being transported

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

Hunt'm if you got'm

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from cooner wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

shoot one for me please we killed all the red wolves around my parts eons ago

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from libertyfirst wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

I'm with everyone else. If the population warrants it, there should be a controlled season. I remember the outcry where the Wardens service wanted to open the Moose season here in Maine. Kids were crying with pictures of Bullwinkle and the anti's were running around with fake blood all over them. The season took place and was a great success and the rest is history. We now have a tremendous healthy herd and the state generates lots of money and the hunters have a great time with a bunch of good meat. Total win win situation! Bring on the wolf hunt.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from woodtick wrote 11 weeks 3 days ago

you have to keep the #'s under control. So Shoot um up

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 7Derrick wrote 11 weeks 2 hours ago

They offer more of a challenge than coyotes. Let the hunters harvest them up, most practical and cheapest solution.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 10 weeks 6 days ago

I believe the states of Idaho and Montana know quite well what the states can successfully sustain in wolf populations in relation to other wildlife population balances. It's better to begin that balance now than to wait till it's out of control and then crisis management is required. I , personally , have no need to hunt wolves, but to those who do, go forward with the hunt. They need to be managed!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 10 weeks 6 days ago

Hunting the wolf before they become a problem is a great idea, keeping the numbers in check is a win win situation.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from bamaoutdoorsman93 wrote 8 weeks 3 days ago

badbadbadbadbadbadbadbadbadbadBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I AM BY NO MEANS A TREE HUGGER BUT I AM AGAINST WOLF HUNTING.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from BioGuy wrote 8 weeks 3 days ago

This topic is such an emotionally loaded issue. The biologist in me knows that wolves are a very charasmatic and intelligent species that are often misunderstood and have been given the "Big Bad Wolf" reputation over the years. However, the biologist and hunter in me knows that nearly all wildlife populations need to be managed to strike a balance between the needs of people and wildlife, in which case, some wolves will need to be killed from time to time.

To all: I would suggest reading the short essay "Thinking Like a Mountain" in the book A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Shoot as many as you can. they are nothing but a pest to farmers ranchers and hunters

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from fisher girl wrote 5 weeks 1 day ago

I think it is a good way to manage the population. Just think of what would happen if the population wasn't managed. If the wolves were relocated they would just keep having more pups anyway, plus if they are put in a place where they have never been before the population of other game would go down.(Rabbits, deer....)

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from beers123 wrote 4 weeks 5 days ago

I look at the wolf population like the local coyote population. I am in Northern IN so no we do not have wolves but a ton of coyotes. Coyotes and wolves are needed either way you look at it. They both keep the local population of small and larger game in check. I do not think that either 1 will completely wipe out rabbits or deer of elk population. It is survival of the fitest they are not going to eat the big bucks/elk they are going to eat the weak and the old and the sick. I have no problem hunting either their population needs to be kept in check also. If they were unhunted the coyotes would be in the farmers livestock more than what they are now. And I figure that the wolves are the same.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from fliphuntr14 wrote 3 weeks 6 days ago

a recent publication by the University of Minnesota that states that wolves after age 3 are on the decline in there hunting abilities and that many of the kills are being made by younger wolves ages 2 and 3. areas with older wolves had more elk and deer. so is the hunting of the oldest wolves really controlling the heard and limiting predators or making the wolf packs stronger by thinning the old and the sick... just as the wolves do for the deer and elk herds. The question is killing the old wolves is it making more room for the younger more strong animals to populate areas and make the problem worse.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from remington1100 wrote 2 weeks 3 days ago

i think wolf hunting is a good idea because there one of the reasons the deer pop. is going down and why there isnt as good of hunting as there used to be 5-10 years ago

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunter Girl 1 wrote 2 weeks 2 days ago

YES! i think that wolf hunting is good becuause the deer population will go up and then there will be more deer to hunt!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ableskeever wrote 1 week 2 days ago

Its the best way to manage the population and the local governments won't be taking tax money to do it. Instead they collect from the hunters who manage the population for the government.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

from Hunt_Hard wrote 12 weeks 2 days ago

My opinion on this subject is that the wolf population should be managed, by doing exactly what Fish & Game of Montana and Idaho are doing. Which is giving a quota that is about 25% of the states wolf population, which in the end turns out good because the next years pups will re-fill the spots of the ones harvested in the prior year. If the management is done right it should keep the wolf population around the same number for years.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 12 weeks 2 days ago

Sure, I would like to have a woff-woff rug.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

I say hunting is a good way to manage the population. Most hunters become protective of the game they hunt, so they will become more eyes and ears out in the field. think about deer hunters and how most would react to a poacher or destruction of habitat.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from 175rltw wrote 12 weeks 1 day ago

GET ADDICTED_ SMOKE A PACK A DAY!! Yeah seriously, If they don't get hunted legitimately then they will become a huge problem in rural residential areas (this is already happening) and paoching and other irresponsiblee and unregulated forms of reprisal against them will dramatically threaten the populations and all the "goos" done with this restoration will be jeopardized

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from swilmot1 wrote 12 weeks 1 day ago

Why Should Wolf hunting be any different then coyote hunting? If the population is abundant enough to hunt they should be managed or it will start effecting other animal populations

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from JOHN ANDERSON wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

EXCELLENT!! question swilmot1.We bought our tags tuesday .

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from peter wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

pawner, do u know the cost it would be to capture them woles, and besides half would die when being transported

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 10 weeks 6 days ago

Hunting the wolf before they become a problem is a great idea, keeping the numbers in check is a win win situation.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from fisher girl wrote 5 weeks 1 day ago

I think it is a good way to manage the population. Just think of what would happen if the population wasn't managed. If the wolves were relocated they would just keep having more pups anyway, plus if they are put in a place where they have never been before the population of other game would go down.(Rabbits, deer....)

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from beers123 wrote 4 weeks 5 days ago

I look at the wolf population like the local coyote population. I am in Northern IN so no we do not have wolves but a ton of coyotes. Coyotes and wolves are needed either way you look at it. They both keep the local population of small and larger game in check. I do not think that either 1 will completely wipe out rabbits or deer of elk population. It is survival of the fitest they are not going to eat the big bucks/elk they are going to eat the weak and the old and the sick. I have no problem hunting either their population needs to be kept in check also. If they were unhunted the coyotes would be in the farmers livestock more than what they are now. And I figure that the wolves are the same.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from fliphuntr14 wrote 3 weeks 6 days ago

a recent publication by the University of Minnesota that states that wolves after age 3 are on the decline in there hunting abilities and that many of the kills are being made by younger wolves ages 2 and 3. areas with older wolves had more elk and deer. so is the hunting of the oldest wolves really controlling the heard and limiting predators or making the wolf packs stronger by thinning the old and the sick... just as the wolves do for the deer and elk herds. The question is killing the old wolves is it making more room for the younger more strong animals to populate areas and make the problem worse.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 12 weeks 1 day ago

Its about time

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from peter wrote 12 weeks 5 hours ago

theve got to do it. wolves have been recovered for a long time

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

Hunt'm if you got'm

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from cooner wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

shoot one for me please we killed all the red wolves around my parts eons ago

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from libertyfirst wrote 11 weeks 6 days ago

I'm with everyone else. If the population warrants it, there should be a controlled season. I remember the outcry where the Wardens service wanted to open the Moose season here in Maine. Kids were crying with pictures of Bullwinkle and the anti's were running around with fake blood all over them. The season took place and was a great success and the rest is history. We now have a tremendous healthy herd and the state generates lots of money and the hunters have a great time with a bunch of good meat. Total win win situation! Bring on the wolf hunt.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from woodtick wrote 11 weeks 3 days ago

you have to keep the #'s under control. So Shoot um up

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 7Derrick wrote 11 weeks 2 hours ago

They offer more of a challenge than coyotes. Let the hunters harvest them up, most practical and cheapest solution.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 10 weeks 6 days ago

I believe the states of Idaho and Montana know quite well what the states can successfully sustain in wolf populations in relation to other wildlife population balances. It's better to begin that balance now than to wait till it's out of control and then crisis management is required. I , personally , have no need to hunt wolves, but to those who do, go forward with the hunt. They need to be managed!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from BioGuy wrote 8 weeks 3 days ago

This topic is such an emotionally loaded issue. The biologist in me knows that wolves are a very charasmatic and intelligent species that are often misunderstood and have been given the "Big Bad Wolf" reputation over the years. However, the biologist and hunter in me knows that nearly all wildlife populations need to be managed to strike a balance between the needs of people and wildlife, in which case, some wolves will need to be killed from time to time.

To all: I would suggest reading the short essay "Thinking Like a Mountain" in the book A Sand County Almanac by Aldo Leopold.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Christian Emter wrote 5 weeks 2 days ago

Shoot as many as you can. they are nothing but a pest to farmers ranchers and hunters

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from remington1100 wrote 2 weeks 3 days ago

i think wolf hunting is a good idea because there one of the reasons the deer pop. is going down and why there isnt as good of hunting as there used to be 5-10 years ago

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunter Girl 1 wrote 2 weeks 2 days ago

YES! i think that wolf hunting is good becuause the deer population will go up and then there will be more deer to hunt!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ableskeever wrote 1 week 2 days ago

Its the best way to manage the population and the local governments won't be taking tax money to do it. Instead they collect from the hunters who manage the population for the government.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bamaoutdoorsman93 wrote 8 weeks 3 days ago

badbadbadbadbadbadbadbadbadbadBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I AM BY NO MEANS A TREE HUGGER BUT I AM AGAINST WOLF HUNTING.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from pawner wrote 12 weeks 2 days ago

I think they should be captured and relocated. Definitely not killed!

-13 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply