I am waiting on my first issue of FS and I can't wait. I have picked up magazines here and there for a couple of years and finally got FS in my hands and there is no comparrison. This magazine is not only extremely helpful and well written but so is the webpage

outdoor life doesnt have as much information and when they do it doesnt seem as reliable

As far as websites go I do like FS better but I'd also point out that they both have the same publishing company and they are doing some of the same things on the web. They both are good magazines and I have a subscription to both.

F&S! But I do enjoy getting both issues each month. One magazine might cover something the other didn't, and I enjoy that.

I have to agree that F&S is much better than OL. They seem to show more interest in topics and give as much insight on a specific subject better then any other sportsmans mag. out there.
Also I really love the fact that they include so many different "everyday Joes" in thier articles and the heroes that they really are.

HEY!!! I'M A SOPHOMORE IN HIGH SCHOOL and i read all the articles!!!!!! And besides the website and magazine of F&S are better than OL, even though you have to admit that the websites are very similar.

Nate

The websites are eerily similar. whats up with that?

I read F&S as soon as it comes in the mail. I disect every article and see how I can apply it to where I am. This is a great magazine and I don't want to put it down when I start it.

I have read both before but I prefer F&S, I like the articles and the photography in the magazine is top notch.

F&S is just a better magazine.

I like what summit229 says. You should ask neutral people and just the people on f&S website.

Nate

i love f&s but recently read an article in OL at my scholl about coyote jhunting am an now not sure wwhich to like better

IM A SOPHMORE IN HIGH SCHOOL TOO!! Ive only read a few outdoor life and field and stream is way better. they are more interactive with readers by letting them contribute to the mag. the website is great and fs has better writers, stories, tips, etc.

i currently subscribe to both magazines, i do like field and stream better tho, but i still get that craving every month, and enjoy both magazines

used to get outdoor life and always liked the "this happened to me" . F and S has something similar, done a little differently, seems to me they didnt always have it?

I hav read both i would have to say F&S is better just for the reason that most of their articles are of high quality on OL there are a few high quality articles which i enjoy but most are just soso articles

I think F&S is much better than outdoor life and thats the reason I subscribe too it. Also, I briefly visited the outdoor life website and it seems like a copy of F&S.

I've been reading them both as long as I can remember and I have to give the edge to F&S. I also subscribe to Turkey & Turkey Hunting, American Hunter and Alabama Wildlife. Lots of good information out there.

Well, As usual I have an opposing opinion. I don't hunt whitetails, have never hunted from a tree stand, and do not consider shooting animals over bait to be sporting or even hunting. I don't fish much for crappie or bass. So, the more F&S specializes in these endeavors the less I am able to relate to the articles. Recently they swerved into the political left lane which certainly does not resonate with me. Outdoor Life on the other hand, has more articles on elk, antelope, and mule deer hunting and approaches the outdoors from a western point of view.