Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Campfire

Scopes

Uploaded on January 04, 2012

I have a Remington .308 and I was wondering what scope eveyone would recommend?

Top Rated
All Replies
from Sarge01 wrote 20 weeks 2 days ago

If you are hunting deer in the early mormning and the late evening I reccomend a Nikon Buckmaster 3X9X50. I have 3 of them and they have served me very well.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bruisedsausage wrote 20 weeks 2 days ago

Go look for a bushnell elite 4200 in 3-9x40. They can be gotten for $150 right now, which is a steal. The next step up in optics would be a Zeiss Conquest.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fezzant wrote 20 weeks 1 day ago

Bushnell and Nikon make decent optics. Another good scope manufacturer is Redfield. They were down for a while but have really brought their quality back. Leupold is better - they own Redfield now. Zeiss and Swarzksi are the tops but you'll really pay for it. I suggest going to a good gun shop or outdoors store (Bass Pro, Cabelas, sometimes Dicks) and taking a look through several different scopes side by side until you find the one you like the best in the price range you're willing to pay.

A 3-9x40 should be good for most applications. If you are planning on shooting at really long ranges or small targets, increase your magnification. If you plan on shooting in low light, especially at those longer ranges, increase the objective lens diameter.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 20 weeks 1 day ago

The Luepold xvII is tough to beat in it's price range. 3-9x40 would be a good fit on your .308

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from hfedder40 wrote 20 weeks 14 hours ago

i use a tasco so that if you happen to be bush wackng and break ur scope ur not out 100.00 get a tasco world class 3x9x40

-2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 30-CAL wrote 20 weeks 8 hours ago

Go with a Leupold or check out the new Redfield its made in the same factory as the Leupolds. 3x9.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from nchunt101 wrote 18 weeks 3 days ago

Spend as much if not more on the scope than the rifle. Nikon, Minox, Leupold. Khales are all good.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 17 weeks 6 days ago

My Leupold scopes have been very good to me but, if price is a consideration (it often is), I purchased a Redfield 3-9X from Midway USA, put it on my Win M70 .250-3000, and I'm very pleased with the combination. The Redfields, now made under Leupold's roof, are a great choice. I believe I have a photo of this rifle on my profile.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bruisedsausage wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Another great choice that is very often over looked is the meopta meopro. (they make the glass for the conquest) And some say they are better than the conquest. Also from what I hear they have great customer service.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Gentlemen, I have an old Redfield Widefield 3-9 in my gun safe. It seems like good glass to me and held it's zero for a couple decades on my Dad's .280 before he gave it to me. Would i be silly to not buy a new scope when my semi-custom E.R. Shaw rifle arrives and put the old Redfield on it? Feel guilty already about buying that rifle though i'm hoping it'll shape up to be a bargain. Curious what you guys would do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fezzant wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Redfield made really great scopes for a long time. Their reputation eventually fell off with their quality, but both have since improved. As long as the scope still holds its zero, I think you should not hesitate to put it to good use.

The only caveat I have is that it may get damaged if you take it out in the field. If you consider it to be an heirloom, you may not want to do that. Modern scopes will stand up to more abuse than one from 30-40 years ago.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 17 weeks 2 days ago

My son has a 2-7X Redfield Widefield on his Savage 7mm Rem Mag and will not part with it. It served for years on my .35 Whelen before that. I am going to share something that was shared with me and is no B.S. The Burris Signature Select made in Greely, Colorado, U.S.A. scopes have 30mm sized internals and excellent glass. I have used a 3-12x44 for 2 seasons and just bought a 3-10x40 really cheap (< $350) from Natches Shooting Supply. Unfortunately, Burris is discontinuing the USA scopes except the Black Diamond line. I may buy another one for the shelf in case a stray rifle wanders by. It may not be the absolute best scope on the planet, but I have not seen one clearer or sharper. In my opinion, it is clearly superior to scopes costing twice as much!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 17 weeks 8 hours ago

steve182, you know you have to pony up for the ER Shaw. While the Redfield is perfectly serviceable half the fun of the new rifle is the new glass! I am looking at the Leupold VX-R in 2-7x33 since I'm mostly planning on using it for a brush rifle for deer and maybe black bear when I can swing the hunts. The waiting is killing me.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ol Krusty wrote 17 weeks 6 hours ago

Something that starts with a L and ends in a eupold.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 15 weeks 3 days ago

My preference would be someting from Leupold in a VX-II up since Burris is dropping the Signature Select.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

from Sarge01 wrote 20 weeks 2 days ago

If you are hunting deer in the early mormning and the late evening I reccomend a Nikon Buckmaster 3X9X50. I have 3 of them and they have served me very well.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 30-CAL wrote 20 weeks 8 hours ago

Go with a Leupold or check out the new Redfield its made in the same factory as the Leupolds. 3x9.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from nchunt101 wrote 18 weeks 3 days ago

Spend as much if not more on the scope than the rifle. Nikon, Minox, Leupold. Khales are all good.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 17 weeks 6 days ago

My Leupold scopes have been very good to me but, if price is a consideration (it often is), I purchased a Redfield 3-9X from Midway USA, put it on my Win M70 .250-3000, and I'm very pleased with the combination. The Redfields, now made under Leupold's roof, are a great choice. I believe I have a photo of this rifle on my profile.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from fezzant wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Redfield made really great scopes for a long time. Their reputation eventually fell off with their quality, but both have since improved. As long as the scope still holds its zero, I think you should not hesitate to put it to good use.

The only caveat I have is that it may get damaged if you take it out in the field. If you consider it to be an heirloom, you may not want to do that. Modern scopes will stand up to more abuse than one from 30-40 years ago.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 17 weeks 2 days ago

My son has a 2-7X Redfield Widefield on his Savage 7mm Rem Mag and will not part with it. It served for years on my .35 Whelen before that. I am going to share something that was shared with me and is no B.S. The Burris Signature Select made in Greely, Colorado, U.S.A. scopes have 30mm sized internals and excellent glass. I have used a 3-12x44 for 2 seasons and just bought a 3-10x40 really cheap (< $350) from Natches Shooting Supply. Unfortunately, Burris is discontinuing the USA scopes except the Black Diamond line. I may buy another one for the shelf in case a stray rifle wanders by. It may not be the absolute best scope on the planet, but I have not seen one clearer or sharper. In my opinion, it is clearly superior to scopes costing twice as much!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 17 weeks 8 hours ago

steve182, you know you have to pony up for the ER Shaw. While the Redfield is perfectly serviceable half the fun of the new rifle is the new glass! I am looking at the Leupold VX-R in 2-7x33 since I'm mostly planning on using it for a brush rifle for deer and maybe black bear when I can swing the hunts. The waiting is killing me.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 15 weeks 3 days ago

My preference would be someting from Leupold in a VX-II up since Burris is dropping the Signature Select.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from bruisedsausage wrote 20 weeks 2 days ago

Go look for a bushnell elite 4200 in 3-9x40. They can be gotten for $150 right now, which is a steal. The next step up in optics would be a Zeiss Conquest.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fezzant wrote 20 weeks 1 day ago

Bushnell and Nikon make decent optics. Another good scope manufacturer is Redfield. They were down for a while but have really brought their quality back. Leupold is better - they own Redfield now. Zeiss and Swarzksi are the tops but you'll really pay for it. I suggest going to a good gun shop or outdoors store (Bass Pro, Cabelas, sometimes Dicks) and taking a look through several different scopes side by side until you find the one you like the best in the price range you're willing to pay.

A 3-9x40 should be good for most applications. If you are planning on shooting at really long ranges or small targets, increase your magnification. If you plan on shooting in low light, especially at those longer ranges, increase the objective lens diameter.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 20 weeks 1 day ago

The Luepold xvII is tough to beat in it's price range. 3-9x40 would be a good fit on your .308

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bruisedsausage wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Another great choice that is very often over looked is the meopta meopro. (they make the glass for the conquest) And some say they are better than the conquest. Also from what I hear they have great customer service.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 17 weeks 5 days ago

Gentlemen, I have an old Redfield Widefield 3-9 in my gun safe. It seems like good glass to me and held it's zero for a couple decades on my Dad's .280 before he gave it to me. Would i be silly to not buy a new scope when my semi-custom E.R. Shaw rifle arrives and put the old Redfield on it? Feel guilty already about buying that rifle though i'm hoping it'll shape up to be a bargain. Curious what you guys would do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ol Krusty wrote 17 weeks 6 hours ago

Something that starts with a L and ends in a eupold.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from hfedder40 wrote 20 weeks 14 hours ago

i use a tasco so that if you happen to be bush wackng and break ur scope ur not out 100.00 get a tasco world class 3x9x40

-2 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply