Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

SHOT Show

time line

Uploaded on October 24, 2012

Now we have evidence via email/emails that have surfaced that Obama sat in the Oval Office with Joey, Pinetta was there I do believe, and knew we were under terrorist attack on our embassy IN REAL TIME!!! And believe it, or not, did absolutely NOTHING! 7 hrs. of hell they are describing the attack on the 4 Americans inside the compound! In those 7 hrs. no military support, no drone support, NOTHING. 6 days later Obama is going on the View, going on David Letterman, and perpetrating a fabricated story the movie causing the attack. That there was an investigation going on as to what happened. I think Romney wanted to stay clear of this debacle, and let the facts unfold on it. Why does Fox News have to provide the evidence to the American people? Where's the President on this?

Top Rated
All Replies
from CervusCanadensis wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

Fox News is getting it wrong. Mark my words.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from CervusCanadensis wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

Just looked at the emails. The first one, which states that the embassy is under attack, is from 4:05 p.m. The second one, which states that the gunfire had stopped and the compound was cleared, is from 4:54 p.m. That's 49 minutes, not 7 hours. Again, Clinch, use your brain, I beg you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

So you want to make a bet on the 7 hrs. of hell? The compound burned for 7 hrs. while the Pres. did NOTHING. 400 intelli folks got the emails that the compound was under terrorist attack. Next day your Messiah flies to Los Vegas to yuck it up. Weeks afterwards he's on tv shows perpetrating a lie about the video that caused it....but you think you are on the side of right by supporting Obama, and the GOP, and Fox is just making a political issue out of all of this.???? Validates my thoughts long ago about liberalism being as corrupt as it gets, and liberals as valueless as one can get. But stick around, this sure hasn't ended. There are lots of intelligent personnel that expect to know all the answers. Right now it is just total stupidity in the minds of the intelligence community to think the President could get away with the stories he's concocted.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocaphilla wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

You'll note that you referred to emails, and that those emails said the compound was under attack for seven hours. I merely addressed that statement. Y'know it's really tough talking to a guy who just simply cannot see past his own BS.

I just want to go ahead and draw your attention to the threads in the Backlash and Blowback section of these message boards. Look to the right and look who has the last comment in most of those threads. It's you, Clinch. You're winning that race by a landslide. You have an uncanny ability to end conversations. Let me be the first to tell you, it's not because you're good at arguing. It's because you're a blowhard who doesn't listen to what is being said by anyone else. I'm sure you read the words (very slowly, no doubt), but you don't think about what they say. You're not winning arguments by not stopping to think before you spew rhetoric. You're making it impossible for people to have a conversation with you. Like this one, for instance. I'm not going to bet you on 7 hours of hell. I'm not even going to talk to you about it because I'm an idiot to you no matter what, because you are small minded.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

So your point is...the compound was not being torched for 7 hrs.? Another verifiable email surfaced today from the State DEPT!! I end conversations because there is no rebuttal except by a leftist moron that still supports these tragic, failed, liberal policies. Twer I a decent liberal, if there is such a person, I wouldn't comment on the Benghazi situation, and others have not...only YOU!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

Racaphilla..Here's where you are factually wrong about the emails, and time line. There were two compounds. The firing stopped after 50 min., or so on the main compound, BUT...there was an ANEX a mile away that the terrorists knew about, and began mortor fire on. Why no reaction on the bigger picture of what went on, and the lies we now now for sure Obama perpetrated? Why pick some minor fact, that has little bearing on the big picture? Clinchknot is all about substance. If you can't handle substance, but would rather support liberal soundbit BS than you will seldom be the last one to post. Look at the posts on the flyfishing blog. Or a comment on shooting a shotgun. I'm usually the last one standing there as well...connect the dots.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

And ROCA.."I merely addressed" ??? You did? There was no ROCAphilla that addressed anything. Where'd you come from? Cervus was the guy that made the address. Are you he, and embarrassed to now be he?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Substance? The only "substance" is Owebama, H. Clinton, S. Rice and J. Carney lied their asses off for no good reason! Period! ...and don't forget Blabbermouth Biden!
The whole stinking bunch needs to be drawn and quartered!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Just so everything is clear its estimates that the firefight in Benghazi was between 6-8 hours long. Here is a link with a timeline of events, since some of you liberals don't seem to think researching something of this magnitude is very important.

www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/oct/24/us-libya-timeline/

Cervus, how about you use your brain and do a little research before you say something idiotic on these threads.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

You guys should rejoin reality and stop listening to conspiracy radio and Faux News. When they ran this whole thing past the focus groups they found out most normal people are offended that someone would use a tragedy to make politics,,,, but not everyone. There's a small bunch of ditto heads that live and breath hate and conspiracy wackiness, and they eat it up, but not a normal person. So they shovel it to you. How's it taste?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

No RAT..Everything you print defending this President just speaks volumes about yourself. There is a wealth of evidence now that Obama irresponsibly allowed these folks to be murdered. Hillary is still trying to prolong the coverup. Even democrat operatives are fessing up, and admitting Obama has lied. There can be no other explanation. Folks are not going to "wait until the invetigation is over" That is like Fast and Furious, or the incredible leak of classified documents that were leaked just to show that Obama was a tough guy on terror. Anyone confident where that investigation will go? With all the evidence in, and more to surface, what can you say about someone like yourself, or someone like Racaphilla that shows up for the first time, and says they "read the memo," and want to dispute my contention that there was not "7 hrs. of hell" because they read the time frame at the bottom, and the attack only lasted for 50 min. What is their agenda? The burning of the two compounds, and attack lasted for 7 hrs.!!! And no forces showed up to defend these defenseless folks! Then the guy they have in custody for leading the attack, says "Where was anyone wanting to question me?" Here I am, and no one seems interested?" And an investigation was going on?..and the perpetrators hunted down? A journalist interviewed this guy from a liberal newspaper! You call it...total ineptitude? Total lack of leadership? Thought the coverup would work when 400 folks got the memos in real time while the terrorist attack was happening?...then weeks later Obama says it was about the movie?..a demonstration went bad? Feels it appropriate to tell Woopy Goldberg on the VIEW what happened a week later?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Think back for a second on the day after this tragedy happened. Fox News, that Rat continues to call FAUX, reported what took place. Fox does not make false reports on things of this magnitude especially. Their reputation is built on getting info right. But the MAINSTREAM MEDIA? They spent 3 days blaming Romney!!! Blaming Romney for not waiting until all the facts were in! He gets intelli just like Obama gets intelli! Maybe not to the "N"th degree that Obama gets it, but he knew there was a terrorist attack. The question then becomes, what commonsense folks in this country listen to, and believe in the liberal, mainstream media? They become irrelevant.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Well Sayfu if this Bengazi thing is such a big deal the media would cover it in a NY second if your guy would just mention it one little time in the speeches he's giving today. But he doesn't, why?

Gee I wonder.....

Maybe cause he's sick of being laughed at for saying crazy things?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Are you just now learning about the mainstream media? There is a wealth of facts out there now, but you aren't accustomed to, or can't digest the facts, and come to a conclusion? I would come to the same conclusion had it been Reagan, or either of the Bush's that led so terribly, irresponsibly bad on this issue, and caused the deaths of these Americans. This was not a short time line happening. The disaster started 6 mo. ago when other agencies were attacked, and Al Queda flags raised above their compounds. And this was far from the 1st attack on ours. A long time line of requests for protection all denied because of Obama's desire to make his foreign policy of "naturalization" of radical Muslims appear to be successful.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

WOW... such a big deal? Four Americans are murdered and in your mind, Rockrat, its just not that much of big deal? You're an idiot and a waste of life.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Absolutely whitetail !!! Here is a sad reality. Liberals have accepted a failed belief system that has never worked, but they still believe it. Anything that interfers, rejects, dispells their belief system they throw out. Anything that pops up that supports their ideology they accept. Even these outrageous murders that took place they reject as failed liberal policy, or the fact that Obama had anything to do with them. It is all Republican politicing they are hearing. In my newspaper tonite, what a highlighted article from my standpoint. The title was the need for liberals to accept ECON 101, and I kid you not. The guy listed a dozen economic myths that liberals accept as fact. I could take the time to list them, but won't. I'd be speaking to the liberals like the RAT, who wouldn't consider any of them as true anyway...sad.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

This is my opinion in all of this. This has been deduced by logic.

Scenario 1: The Libyan "government" did not allow American forces into the country. This is doubtful as reports have said that was not the case. Also, reports show we had a predator UAV reconing the site during the firefight. We were allowed a Predator drone but not air support? Unlikely...

Scenario 2: The Obama administration did not want Al-Queda to appear to be as strong as it is. The attack obviously happened on the anniversary of September 11th. Obviously a shot at our great loss and attack to our country. Perhaps since our President and our Democrat leaders were bragging about OBL's death during the last few months for campaign purposes, this emboldened Al-Queda and its supporters. This could be why the administration did not directly link this attack to terrorists andused the anti-Islamic movie trailer as a scapegoat. Please don't try and tell me the President called the attack at Benghazi an act of terrorism, when his press secretary told the American people that the attack did not seem to be preplanned. He may have inferred that it was an act of terrorism, but himself and his administration back pedalled to focus on blaming the video.

Scenario 3: Help was not sent to avoid making a big scene. Perhaps the Administration rolled the dice and "hoped" our personnel would not be killed. When it hit he fan, the immediately went into recovery mode to help Obamas chances at reelection. Problem is too many people got the emails. Too many people realize that an event of this magnitude would have had to have been brought to the Presidents attention. So now there is talk of an investigation committee which I am sure will result in maybe a firing or resignation or two. Definitely wont be Hillary, but probably lower level AFTER the election IF Obama wins.

In the end, the problem is someone will take responsibility like Hilary or Obama has already done, but noone will be held ACCOUNTABLE. I don't expect this to ruin Obama, but I do expect the truth on exactly why these poor souls were murdered but yet our government did not act in their defense. I don't care about politics on this one. No matter how you cut this or try to spin this, 4 Americans died because our government sat on their hands and did not react because of poor leadership. It saddens me, angers me, and dissapoints me that we let this happen with out even a fight.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Now now whitetail lets not get personal ;-) Surely you can disagree without being disagreeable.

There's no scandal, the Obama admin has acted totally above board throughout. Romney's folks have been getting the same intel briefings that Obama has been getting, no doubt they read them.

If you want to get all indignant over dead people try the 3K plus of 9/11 or the well over 100K in Iraq. OK the first 3K were simply ignorant stupidity, but the Iraq war was a criminal war of choice. Notice no Canadians joined us in that fiasco.

12 days and I'm optimistic.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

I am not saying scandal. What I am saying is the President had to have known what was going on at Benghazi, yet due to piss poor leadership, nothing was done. Pretty much seems like what a junior Senator would do if he became President.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Does this not anger you at all Rat? Our people died and no help was sent. If that doesn't boil your blood, then you are worthless.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CervusCanadensis wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

How does Clinchknot not realize that he just described himself to a tee?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Cervus...How can you not realize that what you are doing is what EVERY dimbulb lib does when confronted with substance? The Lybia debacle that worthless Obama created... the death's of those in the compound I, along with the FOX fact finders, have provided you a wealth of factual information to debate, and comment on....BUT YOU, and all your braindead Obama supporters? You attack the messengers, and try to descredit them. For the first three days after the attack, and many of the facts were in...you supported the mainstream media who attacked Romney as if he caused it !!! You are all like a herd of cattle. Must be enjoyable working so hard to be stupid.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Whitetail I'm way passed anger. Anger that some political hacks would use someone dying to try to score points? Not really, same folks have killed thousands with politics over the past couple decades. Me, useless? Someone has to pay the bills for you folks on entitlements.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Wow! Cervical Cancer, looks like you might wanna wipe that "egg" off your Canuck" face!
First, it was a two tier attack. The first attack lasted two (2) hours in the compound. All survivors move to the annex. Two (2) calls for assistance were met with a firm "No!". A response team was readied and within two hours of Benghazi. SIX HOURS LATER!!! ...the second attack starts! A drone has a laser "fix" on a mortar, requests to fire are denied!
That's EIGHT (8) or more hours. The two Navy SEALS died "disobeying" direct orders to NOT defend the compound!
Seems FOX is the only "news" network with the cajones and spine to report the "real" news!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 23 hours ago

I don't know what you mean by YOU folks on entitlements. Never been on one.

And by the way, I didn't call you useless. I called you worthless, and I'll add pathetic on their too.

This is WAY past politics. Had this been a Republican, I would have been even harder on them. Hell I would have asked for their head. At this point under this administration, I'm not surprised.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

Had it been a Republican? They would have been toast a thousand lies ago. IN 2008 the first week that they ran they'd have been toast. Anyone hear the comment Joe Biden made to the dead Seal's father when they brought the dead Seal home for the funeral? Here is the character, the values of these folks. Joe walks up to the father and asks, "Did your son always have such big brass balls?" The Navy Seal learned of the attack well into the 6 hr of the attack on the compound, and the Navy Seal was told to "Stand down!" don't go over there when he heard the news of the attack. He went over and tried to help, and was killed.. Yeh, all because of the movie.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

Speaking of SEALS, just watched Act Of Valorous last night. Great movie and I hope everyone watches it since the SEALS in the film are actually active SEALS. Its quick to tell to when you watch them shoot move and communicate.

I am sure the SEAL that gave his life took out a hell of a lot of the enemy, and I pray his family finds out the truth and peace in his sacrifice. God bless these warriors.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

*Sorry - Act of Valor (stupid auto correct)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

www.youtu.be/ubaVPCaDb1I

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 8 hours ago

Great video rat. Please show me more how worthless you are.

Reports are coming out now that operators were denied three times the green light to try and save the Ambassador. I think its pathetic all Americans, whether Democrat or Republican aren't foaming at the mouth wanting answers. I wish, that if his horrible tragedy had to have happened it would be after the election, just so politics and party lines weren't so obviously involved.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 8 hours ago

Yesterday on Rush I noticed this topic was #1, caught it on Beck too. Yet Romney is 100% silent, why?

www.youtu.be/ubaVPCaDb1I

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 5 hours ago

Why? Because the scandel speaks for itself. Why would Romney get involved in it, and anything he would say the Liar in Chief would attack him on what he said. The media spent 3 days attacking Romney rather than follow the unfolding events early on. Romney stays above the fray and appears Presidential while the Pres has flopped all over the place throwing crap against the wall seeing if it will stick. Obama has Penetta, who has always been regarded as a decent human being out trying to cover for him. You sure don't want to see a family member of one of the murdered victims being interviewed on national tv. Romney can just state that there was total lack of leadership regarding the attack, and the 6 mo. prior to the attack.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 5 hours ago

Whatever happened to this Rocophilla dude? lol! Just stepped in to spread a little leftist BS did they, and then back into their socialist central headquarters after they were caught in a falsehood?

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

So your point is...the compound was not being torched for 7 hrs.? Another verifiable email surfaced today from the State DEPT!! I end conversations because there is no rebuttal except by a leftist moron that still supports these tragic, failed, liberal policies. Twer I a decent liberal, if there is such a person, I wouldn't comment on the Benghazi situation, and others have not...only YOU!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Just so everything is clear its estimates that the firefight in Benghazi was between 6-8 hours long. Here is a link with a timeline of events, since some of you liberals don't seem to think researching something of this magnitude is very important.

www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/oct/24/us-libya-timeline/

Cervus, how about you use your brain and do a little research before you say something idiotic on these threads.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

Speaking of SEALS, just watched Act Of Valorous last night. Great movie and I hope everyone watches it since the SEALS in the film are actually active SEALS. Its quick to tell to when you watch them shoot move and communicate.

I am sure the SEAL that gave his life took out a hell of a lot of the enemy, and I pray his family finds out the truth and peace in his sacrifice. God bless these warriors.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from CervusCanadensis wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

Just looked at the emails. The first one, which states that the embassy is under attack, is from 4:05 p.m. The second one, which states that the gunfire had stopped and the compound was cleared, is from 4:54 p.m. That's 49 minutes, not 7 hours. Again, Clinch, use your brain, I beg you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

So you want to make a bet on the 7 hrs. of hell? The compound burned for 7 hrs. while the Pres. did NOTHING. 400 intelli folks got the emails that the compound was under terrorist attack. Next day your Messiah flies to Los Vegas to yuck it up. Weeks afterwards he's on tv shows perpetrating a lie about the video that caused it....but you think you are on the side of right by supporting Obama, and the GOP, and Fox is just making a political issue out of all of this.???? Validates my thoughts long ago about liberalism being as corrupt as it gets, and liberals as valueless as one can get. But stick around, this sure hasn't ended. There are lots of intelligent personnel that expect to know all the answers. Right now it is just total stupidity in the minds of the intelligence community to think the President could get away with the stories he's concocted.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocaphilla wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

You'll note that you referred to emails, and that those emails said the compound was under attack for seven hours. I merely addressed that statement. Y'know it's really tough talking to a guy who just simply cannot see past his own BS.

I just want to go ahead and draw your attention to the threads in the Backlash and Blowback section of these message boards. Look to the right and look who has the last comment in most of those threads. It's you, Clinch. You're winning that race by a landslide. You have an uncanny ability to end conversations. Let me be the first to tell you, it's not because you're good at arguing. It's because you're a blowhard who doesn't listen to what is being said by anyone else. I'm sure you read the words (very slowly, no doubt), but you don't think about what they say. You're not winning arguments by not stopping to think before you spew rhetoric. You're making it impossible for people to have a conversation with you. Like this one, for instance. I'm not going to bet you on 7 hours of hell. I'm not even going to talk to you about it because I'm an idiot to you no matter what, because you are small minded.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

Racaphilla..Here's where you are factually wrong about the emails, and time line. There were two compounds. The firing stopped after 50 min., or so on the main compound, BUT...there was an ANEX a mile away that the terrorists knew about, and began mortor fire on. Why no reaction on the bigger picture of what went on, and the lies we now now for sure Obama perpetrated? Why pick some minor fact, that has little bearing on the big picture? Clinchknot is all about substance. If you can't handle substance, but would rather support liberal soundbit BS than you will seldom be the last one to post. Look at the posts on the flyfishing blog. Or a comment on shooting a shotgun. I'm usually the last one standing there as well...connect the dots.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

And ROCA.."I merely addressed" ??? You did? There was no ROCAphilla that addressed anything. Where'd you come from? Cervus was the guy that made the address. Are you he, and embarrassed to now be he?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Substance? The only "substance" is Owebama, H. Clinton, S. Rice and J. Carney lied their asses off for no good reason! Period! ...and don't forget Blabbermouth Biden!
The whole stinking bunch needs to be drawn and quartered!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

You guys should rejoin reality and stop listening to conspiracy radio and Faux News. When they ran this whole thing past the focus groups they found out most normal people are offended that someone would use a tragedy to make politics,,,, but not everyone. There's a small bunch of ditto heads that live and breath hate and conspiracy wackiness, and they eat it up, but not a normal person. So they shovel it to you. How's it taste?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

No RAT..Everything you print defending this President just speaks volumes about yourself. There is a wealth of evidence now that Obama irresponsibly allowed these folks to be murdered. Hillary is still trying to prolong the coverup. Even democrat operatives are fessing up, and admitting Obama has lied. There can be no other explanation. Folks are not going to "wait until the invetigation is over" That is like Fast and Furious, or the incredible leak of classified documents that were leaked just to show that Obama was a tough guy on terror. Anyone confident where that investigation will go? With all the evidence in, and more to surface, what can you say about someone like yourself, or someone like Racaphilla that shows up for the first time, and says they "read the memo," and want to dispute my contention that there was not "7 hrs. of hell" because they read the time frame at the bottom, and the attack only lasted for 50 min. What is their agenda? The burning of the two compounds, and attack lasted for 7 hrs.!!! And no forces showed up to defend these defenseless folks! Then the guy they have in custody for leading the attack, says "Where was anyone wanting to question me?" Here I am, and no one seems interested?" And an investigation was going on?..and the perpetrators hunted down? A journalist interviewed this guy from a liberal newspaper! You call it...total ineptitude? Total lack of leadership? Thought the coverup would work when 400 folks got the memos in real time while the terrorist attack was happening?...then weeks later Obama says it was about the movie?..a demonstration went bad? Feels it appropriate to tell Woopy Goldberg on the VIEW what happened a week later?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Think back for a second on the day after this tragedy happened. Fox News, that Rat continues to call FAUX, reported what took place. Fox does not make false reports on things of this magnitude especially. Their reputation is built on getting info right. But the MAINSTREAM MEDIA? They spent 3 days blaming Romney!!! Blaming Romney for not waiting until all the facts were in! He gets intelli just like Obama gets intelli! Maybe not to the "N"th degree that Obama gets it, but he knew there was a terrorist attack. The question then becomes, what commonsense folks in this country listen to, and believe in the liberal, mainstream media? They become irrelevant.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Well Sayfu if this Bengazi thing is such a big deal the media would cover it in a NY second if your guy would just mention it one little time in the speeches he's giving today. But he doesn't, why?

Gee I wonder.....

Maybe cause he's sick of being laughed at for saying crazy things?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

Are you just now learning about the mainstream media? There is a wealth of facts out there now, but you aren't accustomed to, or can't digest the facts, and come to a conclusion? I would come to the same conclusion had it been Reagan, or either of the Bush's that led so terribly, irresponsibly bad on this issue, and caused the deaths of these Americans. This was not a short time line happening. The disaster started 6 mo. ago when other agencies were attacked, and Al Queda flags raised above their compounds. And this was far from the 1st attack on ours. A long time line of requests for protection all denied because of Obama's desire to make his foreign policy of "naturalization" of radical Muslims appear to be successful.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 2 days ago

WOW... such a big deal? Four Americans are murdered and in your mind, Rockrat, its just not that much of big deal? You're an idiot and a waste of life.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Absolutely whitetail !!! Here is a sad reality. Liberals have accepted a failed belief system that has never worked, but they still believe it. Anything that interfers, rejects, dispells their belief system they throw out. Anything that pops up that supports their ideology they accept. Even these outrageous murders that took place they reject as failed liberal policy, or the fact that Obama had anything to do with them. It is all Republican politicing they are hearing. In my newspaper tonite, what a highlighted article from my standpoint. The title was the need for liberals to accept ECON 101, and I kid you not. The guy listed a dozen economic myths that liberals accept as fact. I could take the time to list them, but won't. I'd be speaking to the liberals like the RAT, who wouldn't consider any of them as true anyway...sad.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

This is my opinion in all of this. This has been deduced by logic.

Scenario 1: The Libyan "government" did not allow American forces into the country. This is doubtful as reports have said that was not the case. Also, reports show we had a predator UAV reconing the site during the firefight. We were allowed a Predator drone but not air support? Unlikely...

Scenario 2: The Obama administration did not want Al-Queda to appear to be as strong as it is. The attack obviously happened on the anniversary of September 11th. Obviously a shot at our great loss and attack to our country. Perhaps since our President and our Democrat leaders were bragging about OBL's death during the last few months for campaign purposes, this emboldened Al-Queda and its supporters. This could be why the administration did not directly link this attack to terrorists andused the anti-Islamic movie trailer as a scapegoat. Please don't try and tell me the President called the attack at Benghazi an act of terrorism, when his press secretary told the American people that the attack did not seem to be preplanned. He may have inferred that it was an act of terrorism, but himself and his administration back pedalled to focus on blaming the video.

Scenario 3: Help was not sent to avoid making a big scene. Perhaps the Administration rolled the dice and "hoped" our personnel would not be killed. When it hit he fan, the immediately went into recovery mode to help Obamas chances at reelection. Problem is too many people got the emails. Too many people realize that an event of this magnitude would have had to have been brought to the Presidents attention. So now there is talk of an investigation committee which I am sure will result in maybe a firing or resignation or two. Definitely wont be Hillary, but probably lower level AFTER the election IF Obama wins.

In the end, the problem is someone will take responsibility like Hilary or Obama has already done, but noone will be held ACCOUNTABLE. I don't expect this to ruin Obama, but I do expect the truth on exactly why these poor souls were murdered but yet our government did not act in their defense. I don't care about politics on this one. No matter how you cut this or try to spin this, 4 Americans died because our government sat on their hands and did not react because of poor leadership. It saddens me, angers me, and dissapoints me that we let this happen with out even a fight.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Now now whitetail lets not get personal ;-) Surely you can disagree without being disagreeable.

There's no scandal, the Obama admin has acted totally above board throughout. Romney's folks have been getting the same intel briefings that Obama has been getting, no doubt they read them.

If you want to get all indignant over dead people try the 3K plus of 9/11 or the well over 100K in Iraq. OK the first 3K were simply ignorant stupidity, but the Iraq war was a criminal war of choice. Notice no Canadians joined us in that fiasco.

12 days and I'm optimistic.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

I am not saying scandal. What I am saying is the President had to have known what was going on at Benghazi, yet due to piss poor leadership, nothing was done. Pretty much seems like what a junior Senator would do if he became President.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Does this not anger you at all Rat? Our people died and no help was sent. If that doesn't boil your blood, then you are worthless.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CervusCanadensis wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

How does Clinchknot not realize that he just described himself to a tee?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Cervus...How can you not realize that what you are doing is what EVERY dimbulb lib does when confronted with substance? The Lybia debacle that worthless Obama created... the death's of those in the compound I, along with the FOX fact finders, have provided you a wealth of factual information to debate, and comment on....BUT YOU, and all your braindead Obama supporters? You attack the messengers, and try to descredit them. For the first three days after the attack, and many of the facts were in...you supported the mainstream media who attacked Romney as if he caused it !!! You are all like a herd of cattle. Must be enjoyable working so hard to be stupid.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Whitetail I'm way passed anger. Anger that some political hacks would use someone dying to try to score points? Not really, same folks have killed thousands with politics over the past couple decades. Me, useless? Someone has to pay the bills for you folks on entitlements.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 33 weeks 1 day ago

Wow! Cervical Cancer, looks like you might wanna wipe that "egg" off your Canuck" face!
First, it was a two tier attack. The first attack lasted two (2) hours in the compound. All survivors move to the annex. Two (2) calls for assistance were met with a firm "No!". A response team was readied and within two hours of Benghazi. SIX HOURS LATER!!! ...the second attack starts! A drone has a laser "fix" on a mortar, requests to fire are denied!
That's EIGHT (8) or more hours. The two Navy SEALS died "disobeying" direct orders to NOT defend the compound!
Seems FOX is the only "news" network with the cajones and spine to report the "real" news!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 23 hours ago

I don't know what you mean by YOU folks on entitlements. Never been on one.

And by the way, I didn't call you useless. I called you worthless, and I'll add pathetic on their too.

This is WAY past politics. Had this been a Republican, I would have been even harder on them. Hell I would have asked for their head. At this point under this administration, I'm not surprised.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

Had it been a Republican? They would have been toast a thousand lies ago. IN 2008 the first week that they ran they'd have been toast. Anyone hear the comment Joe Biden made to the dead Seal's father when they brought the dead Seal home for the funeral? Here is the character, the values of these folks. Joe walks up to the father and asks, "Did your son always have such big brass balls?" The Navy Seal learned of the attack well into the 6 hr of the attack on the compound, and the Navy Seal was told to "Stand down!" don't go over there when he heard the news of the attack. He went over and tried to help, and was killed.. Yeh, all because of the movie.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

*Sorry - Act of Valor (stupid auto correct)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 9 hours ago

www.youtu.be/ubaVPCaDb1I

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from whitetailfreek wrote 33 weeks 8 hours ago

Great video rat. Please show me more how worthless you are.

Reports are coming out now that operators were denied three times the green light to try and save the Ambassador. I think its pathetic all Americans, whether Democrat or Republican aren't foaming at the mouth wanting answers. I wish, that if his horrible tragedy had to have happened it would be after the election, just so politics and party lines weren't so obviously involved.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 33 weeks 8 hours ago

Yesterday on Rush I noticed this topic was #1, caught it on Beck too. Yet Romney is 100% silent, why?

www.youtu.be/ubaVPCaDb1I

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 5 hours ago

Why? Because the scandel speaks for itself. Why would Romney get involved in it, and anything he would say the Liar in Chief would attack him on what he said. The media spent 3 days attacking Romney rather than follow the unfolding events early on. Romney stays above the fray and appears Presidential while the Pres has flopped all over the place throwing crap against the wall seeing if it will stick. Obama has Penetta, who has always been regarded as a decent human being out trying to cover for him. You sure don't want to see a family member of one of the murdered victims being interviewed on national tv. Romney can just state that there was total lack of leadership regarding the attack, and the 6 mo. prior to the attack.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from clinchknot wrote 33 weeks 5 hours ago

Whatever happened to this Rocophilla dude? lol! Just stepped in to spread a little leftist BS did they, and then back into their socialist central headquarters after they were caught in a falsehood?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CervusCanadensis wrote 33 weeks 3 days ago

Fox News is getting it wrong. Mark my words.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply