Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

What's It Worth?

A liberal, a conservative, and a moderate walked into a bar

Uploaded on February 11, 2012

and the bartender said "Hi Mitt".

Top Rated
All Replies
from steve182 wrote 14 weeks 6 days ago

Did you ever hear the one about the Pope and Racquel Welch?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 14 weeks 6 days ago

No,,,, was that the wrong answer?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from phlyzor wrote 14 weeks 4 days ago

That is actually funny.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from pbshooter1217 wrote 14 weeks 4 days ago

I don't know what you're so upset about Moishie, apparently you've been told to stop spamming on several occasions. You were told to alter your behavior, you didn't, so now you got in "trouble". Seems like a lot more of that needs to go around instead of everyone having to keep putting up with undesired behaviors.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

I am not upset at all, in fact I am relieved to stop trying to educate the libtards.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

Especially young brats.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from pbshooter1217 wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

I'm relieved that I don't have to put up with some old fart who thinks he knows everything there is to know about everything because you took some pictures and bought gold.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

pbshooter1217,
It's a common ailment. First one assigns oneself with superior knowledge and therefore anything someones else knows is inferior.
I think there's even a term for it...megalomania or something close.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

Still lurking.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

Good point, what about the declaration of vacating this section?
Man of conviction I see.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from phlyzor wrote 14 weeks 1 day ago

from Hoski wrote 2 hours 22 min ago

pbshooter1217,
It's a common ailment. First one assigns oneself with superior knowledge and therefore anything someones else knows is inferior.
I think there's even a term for it...megalomania or something close.

Question: to whom are you referring? You? If I had a dime for every time you told me that you have already solved an issue that comes up on this blog, I'd have enough buy some cigarettes to trade a homeless guy for his vote.

If you don't like what he is posting then don't read it. Duh! You speak as though you HAVE to read everything he writes and then you HAVE to take the time to make comments on it. There just aren't enough hours in the day to be right on everything is there Hoski?

When did you get a sense of humor? I don't read everything you write, obviously, but I didn't see where you gave rat permission to post a funny.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 1 day ago

Too bad you're having difficulty following along.
Ask the spammer or anyone else who've complained for assistance.
For the record I have a helleva sense of humor...at times I even take you seriously.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from phlyzor wrote 14 weeks 1 day ago

You are funnier than you think you are....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 14 weeks 18 hours ago

Wanna know what's REALLY funny, phlyzor!

First off, Homaski considers me a "non-entity"(basically, I don't exist, ergo: there's a spook writing this! LOL!!)
Second off, Homask refuses to believe that Planned Parenthood not only TAKES U.S. Gov't tax dollars, it also provides, plans and arranges abortions, both outside and inhouse. Clinical and medicinal (Morning After pill!) abortions! All you gotta do is google "planned parenthood funding" and it will show you everything!
Recently, the Susan G. Komen Foundation pulled it's funding from PP! Suddenly, PP absolutely threw a wall-eyed fit that without the Komen Foundation's funding, they would not have the necessary funds to provide abortions.
Homaski claims that the PP books are the most closely audited in the nation! Too bad we don't keep as close a watch on the rest of Washington! BUT, my point is, Planned Parenthood STILL uses Gov't tax dollars to provide, plan and arrange abortions!
(You can't use the money to pay for abortions, but if you need forceps, syringes, instrument trays etc., etc.,....you can buy that!)
It's called playing fast and loose with the verbage!!!
The actual dollar may not make it to the abortionist hands, but his/her hands would be stained were the Gov't dollars dyed!!

Oh, Homaski! As a non-entity, I really don't expect any response, just expect you to google planned parenthood and do your own research!

Bubba

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 14 weeks 17 hours ago

Well Rick Santorum was bragging about how he voted to fund planned parenthood, but fear not he still believes contraception leads to abortions.

"I mean, the bottom line is my position is very clear. I've had a -- a consistent record on this of supporting women's right to have contraception" last night Fox "News".

Nice guy. Wonder what he'll say about abortion, maybe catching flip flop fever.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 16 hours ago

Right now the remaining "candidates" are so tightly wound up they'll say anything. They have their campaign manager to brief them on points to hit depending on which ever crowd they happen to be standing in front of at the moment.
Anybody catch Romney yesterday in Michigan? Told the crowd there the trees were "just the right height". Went on to say he loved cars...wonder how that plays against his speech about allowing the big 3 to go bankrupt.
At this point Romney doesn't even look good to win Michigan, one of the 5 states he claims as home state.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

OK. So they walk into a bar. Then what?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

"The bartender says, "Hi Mitt"".

It's up top, appeared when you open the post.

Romney is in Idaho today, the SE portion of which is his kind of country (very Mormon) if a little too conservative for his likes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

a conservatives walks into a bar with a liberal? Didn't the conservative's folks ever tell him "You are who the company you keep?"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

I heard it another way. A black guy, an illegal alien, a Muslim, and a communist walk into a barber shop and the barber asks " What can I get you Mr. President?"

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

Sarge, there's a cross burning in DuPont tomorrow night. You gonna be there?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

backcast,
No I'm still tired from the one I went to last night.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

Touche Sarge. Plus one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

Subject: Conservatives/Liberals
Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
-
The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
-
1. Liberals; and
2. Conservatives
-
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
-
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.
-
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.
-
Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men.
-
Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
-
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
-
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare.
-
-Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group
therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.
-
Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, Polymer Science PhDs, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, Physicists, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.
-
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.
-
Here ends today's lesson in world history: It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it. A Conservative will simply laugh and be so
convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to piss them off.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

« Darling, I am Here For You
Blind Loyalty, Betrayal and Self Preservation: The Silencing of Dissent »

Narcissists and Sycophants: A Marriage Made in Hell

Whether we realize it or not, we all have at least one narcissist in our lives. In fact, according to authors Jean Twenge, PhD and Keith Campbell, PhD, there is a narcissism epidemic in this country. (The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement, Free Press, 2009, Twenge PhD., Campbell, PhD.).

After reading this eye opening book I found myself thinking about this subject in general and agree with the authors that narcissism is sweeping our country and wreaking havoc on the personal, social and professional relationships of the masses. Most of us, however, live in denial. We don’t want to view someone we look up to as a narcissist and we certainly don’t want to acknowledge the hold narcissists have on us and on the world at large. We also live in denial about the part we play in the creation of the narcissist and the perpetuation of his or her behavior. Far too often the people drawn into the narcissist’s force field enable, condone and tolerate the negative and destructive behavior of the narcissist. We absolve ourselves by saying we are doing it for the greater good, or by apologizing for the narcissist’s behavior. Often we take responsibility for the damage caused to other’s psyches by the narcissist. If truth be known, we do it because we are afraid. We don’t want to wound the highly sensitive narcissist because we will pay dearly for this narcissistic injury. We don’t want to be tossed out of the narcissist’s orbit for speaking up, for disagreeing or challenging the narcissist because what we get from the narcissist fuels our own needs.

I have a theory about why this is. From my life experience, I have come to believe that sycophants fuel narcissists and enable them to exist and even thrive. I am sure this isn’t a new or novel idea on my part. In fact, it is probably overly simplistic.

Let’s begin with some descriptions. A narcissist is a person with inordinate fascination with himself or herself. They have few social control mechanisms, fewer friends, little or no psychic demands to do the right thing (even though they give lip service to this concept) do not look for approval from others, lack social barometers of how to conduct themselves, and are driven to be captivating, inspirational, charming and seductive. They have a desperate need to get others to buy into their worldview–their vision, to create a world that they populate with their devoted followers. They are grandiose, don’t listen to others, are prone to angry outbursts (often used to control others who disagree with them), bully subordinates, dominate meetings and are often isolated and paranoid. According to Twenge and Campbell, narcissism is “a disease that causes others to suffer.” Narcissism is nearly always corrosive to social relationships as it breeds distrust. Narcissists are prone to using people like they use books, information and knowledge—they pump them for information and then when they are through, throw them aside. To the narcissist, there are only friends or foes; you are either for or against their vision. There is no middle ground.

Sycophants are self-serving servile flatterers and are often slavishly submissive to the narcissist. The narcissist and the sycophant need each other. The narcissist is completely dependent on the sycophant to feed his ego, to feel important and powerful. The sycophant, on the other hand, is also dependent on the narcissist for the narcissist makes the sycophant feel included and connected to someone the sycophant believes is powerful and important and will elevate the sycophant to great success, recognition or social standing. The sycophant derives a lot of self worth from the narcissist as the relationship with the narcissist gives the sycophant social standing he otherwise would not have. In short, the relationship between the narcissist and sycophant is symbiotic; each feeding and dependent on the other. Without sycophants, the narcissist struggles, becomes depressed and feels his or her life has no meaning. A narcissist must have blind allegiance and the adoration of sycophantic followers because that is the food of the narcissist. Most often, a narcissist surrounds him or herself with “yes men” (slavishly submissive flatterers) who the narcissist sees as no threat to him or herself but yet, who are also not much good for advancing the narcissist’s vision. But that is ok with the narcissist, because he or she has all the answers, knows what is best and right and doesn’t listen to others anyway. The “yes men” are the means to an end, they help the narcissist get what he or she wants and will only be kept close as long as they serve a purpose.

As a group, sycophants find meaning and purpose out of protecting and becoming the narcissist’s handlers. They bond with other sycophants in this common purpose and are simultaneously validated by each other for how dysfunctional this interpersonal interplay is, either on a conscious or unconscious level, depending on the dysfunction of each individual. In such groups, everyone suffers. There are no winners in this symbiotic relationship. The narcissist’s hold is so great it is hard for the sycophant to escape the narcissist’s seductive embrace. At some point, depending on the amount of pain the sycophant has had to endure, they will wake up when they are no longer able to tolerate being used or when their own ethics or integrity will no longer permit them to be passive participants in the destructive world of the narcissist. Faced with abandonment, the narcissist acts more and more out of desperation, devolves deeper into his or her pathology and ends up alone and even more isolated, completing the cycle of narcissistic self-destruction.

In the end, narcissists die alone and sycophants suffer stunted emotional and psychological growth, unless they grow strong enough to break their addiction and choose to value their own self-worth instead of abandoning it for the advancement of the narcissist.

I highly recommend anyone interested in the burgeoning narcissism epidemic read Twenge and Campbell’s excellent book. It is both eye opening and thought provoking.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

More spam. Did you post the second one for clinchfu?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 13 weeks 4 days ago

For Clay

SPAM pink and lovely
processed and quivering here
my plate starts to melt

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 13 weeks 3 days ago

Wonder where my buddy clinch has been? Probably out participating in the incredible Tea Party grass movement that is going on that will be the major influence in this year's elections. GO CLINCH!!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

from Sarge01 wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

I heard it another way. A black guy, an illegal alien, a Muslim, and a communist walk into a barber shop and the barber asks " What can I get you Mr. President?"

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

backcast,
No I'm still tired from the one I went to last night.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from pbshooter1217 wrote 14 weeks 4 days ago

I don't know what you're so upset about Moishie, apparently you've been told to stop spamming on several occasions. You were told to alter your behavior, you didn't, so now you got in "trouble". Seems like a lot more of that needs to go around instead of everyone having to keep putting up with undesired behaviors.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from pbshooter1217 wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

I'm relieved that I don't have to put up with some old fart who thinks he knows everything there is to know about everything because you took some pictures and bought gold.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

Sarge, there's a cross burning in DuPont tomorrow night. You gonna be there?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

More spam. Did you post the second one for clinchfu?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 13 weeks 4 days ago

For Clay

SPAM pink and lovely
processed and quivering here
my plate starts to melt

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 14 weeks 6 days ago

Did you ever hear the one about the Pope and Racquel Welch?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 14 weeks 6 days ago

No,,,, was that the wrong answer?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from phlyzor wrote 14 weeks 4 days ago

That is actually funny.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

pbshooter1217,
It's a common ailment. First one assigns oneself with superior knowledge and therefore anything someones else knows is inferior.
I think there's even a term for it...megalomania or something close.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

Still lurking.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

Good point, what about the declaration of vacating this section?
Man of conviction I see.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 1 day ago

Too bad you're having difficulty following along.
Ask the spammer or anyone else who've complained for assistance.
For the record I have a helleva sense of humor...at times I even take you seriously.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from phlyzor wrote 14 weeks 1 day ago

You are funnier than you think you are....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 14 weeks 17 hours ago

Well Rick Santorum was bragging about how he voted to fund planned parenthood, but fear not he still believes contraception leads to abortions.

"I mean, the bottom line is my position is very clear. I've had a -- a consistent record on this of supporting women's right to have contraception" last night Fox "News".

Nice guy. Wonder what he'll say about abortion, maybe catching flip flop fever.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoski wrote 14 weeks 16 hours ago

Right now the remaining "candidates" are so tightly wound up they'll say anything. They have their campaign manager to brief them on points to hit depending on which ever crowd they happen to be standing in front of at the moment.
Anybody catch Romney yesterday in Michigan? Told the crowd there the trees were "just the right height". Went on to say he loved cars...wonder how that plays against his speech about allowing the big 3 to go bankrupt.
At this point Romney doesn't even look good to win Michigan, one of the 5 states he claims as home state.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

OK. So they walk into a bar. Then what?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

"The bartender says, "Hi Mitt"".

It's up top, appeared when you open the post.

Romney is in Idaho today, the SE portion of which is his kind of country (very Mormon) if a little too conservative for his likes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 13 weeks 6 days ago

a conservatives walks into a bar with a liberal? Didn't the conservative's folks ever tell him "You are who the company you keep?"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from backcast wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

Touche Sarge. Plus one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

Subject: Conservatives/Liberals
Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
-
The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
-
1. Liberals; and
2. Conservatives
-
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
-
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement.
-
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.
-
Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as girlie-men.
-
Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
-
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
-
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare.
-
-Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group
therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.
-
Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, Polymer Science PhDs, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, Physicists, police officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.
-
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.
-
Here ends today's lesson in world history: It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to the above before forwarding it. A Conservative will simply laugh and be so
convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true believers and to more liberals just to piss them off.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 13 weeks 5 days ago

« Darling, I am Here For You
Blind Loyalty, Betrayal and Self Preservation: The Silencing of Dissent »

Narcissists and Sycophants: A Marriage Made in Hell

Whether we realize it or not, we all have at least one narcissist in our lives. In fact, according to authors Jean Twenge, PhD and Keith Campbell, PhD, there is a narcissism epidemic in this country. (The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement, Free Press, 2009, Twenge PhD., Campbell, PhD.).

After reading this eye opening book I found myself thinking about this subject in general and agree with the authors that narcissism is sweeping our country and wreaking havoc on the personal, social and professional relationships of the masses. Most of us, however, live in denial. We don’t want to view someone we look up to as a narcissist and we certainly don’t want to acknowledge the hold narcissists have on us and on the world at large. We also live in denial about the part we play in the creation of the narcissist and the perpetuation of his or her behavior. Far too often the people drawn into the narcissist’s force field enable, condone and tolerate the negative and destructive behavior of the narcissist. We absolve ourselves by saying we are doing it for the greater good, or by apologizing for the narcissist’s behavior. Often we take responsibility for the damage caused to other’s psyches by the narcissist. If truth be known, we do it because we are afraid. We don’t want to wound the highly sensitive narcissist because we will pay dearly for this narcissistic injury. We don’t want to be tossed out of the narcissist’s orbit for speaking up, for disagreeing or challenging the narcissist because what we get from the narcissist fuels our own needs.

I have a theory about why this is. From my life experience, I have come to believe that sycophants fuel narcissists and enable them to exist and even thrive. I am sure this isn’t a new or novel idea on my part. In fact, it is probably overly simplistic.

Let’s begin with some descriptions. A narcissist is a person with inordinate fascination with himself or herself. They have few social control mechanisms, fewer friends, little or no psychic demands to do the right thing (even though they give lip service to this concept) do not look for approval from others, lack social barometers of how to conduct themselves, and are driven to be captivating, inspirational, charming and seductive. They have a desperate need to get others to buy into their worldview–their vision, to create a world that they populate with their devoted followers. They are grandiose, don’t listen to others, are prone to angry outbursts (often used to control others who disagree with them), bully subordinates, dominate meetings and are often isolated and paranoid. According to Twenge and Campbell, narcissism is “a disease that causes others to suffer.” Narcissism is nearly always corrosive to social relationships as it breeds distrust. Narcissists are prone to using people like they use books, information and knowledge—they pump them for information and then when they are through, throw them aside. To the narcissist, there are only friends or foes; you are either for or against their vision. There is no middle ground.

Sycophants are self-serving servile flatterers and are often slavishly submissive to the narcissist. The narcissist and the sycophant need each other. The narcissist is completely dependent on the sycophant to feed his ego, to feel important and powerful. The sycophant, on the other hand, is also dependent on the narcissist for the narcissist makes the sycophant feel included and connected to someone the sycophant believes is powerful and important and will elevate the sycophant to great success, recognition or social standing. The sycophant derives a lot of self worth from the narcissist as the relationship with the narcissist gives the sycophant social standing he otherwise would not have. In short, the relationship between the narcissist and sycophant is symbiotic; each feeding and dependent on the other. Without sycophants, the narcissist struggles, becomes depressed and feels his or her life has no meaning. A narcissist must have blind allegiance and the adoration of sycophantic followers because that is the food of the narcissist. Most often, a narcissist surrounds him or herself with “yes men” (slavishly submissive flatterers) who the narcissist sees as no threat to him or herself but yet, who are also not much good for advancing the narcissist’s vision. But that is ok with the narcissist, because he or she has all the answers, knows what is best and right and doesn’t listen to others anyway. The “yes men” are the means to an end, they help the narcissist get what he or she wants and will only be kept close as long as they serve a purpose.

As a group, sycophants find meaning and purpose out of protecting and becoming the narcissist’s handlers. They bond with other sycophants in this common purpose and are simultaneously validated by each other for how dysfunctional this interpersonal interplay is, either on a conscious or unconscious level, depending on the dysfunction of each individual. In such groups, everyone suffers. There are no winners in this symbiotic relationship. The narcissist’s hold is so great it is hard for the sycophant to escape the narcissist’s seductive embrace. At some point, depending on the amount of pain the sycophant has had to endure, they will wake up when they are no longer able to tolerate being used or when their own ethics or integrity will no longer permit them to be passive participants in the destructive world of the narcissist. Faced with abandonment, the narcissist acts more and more out of desperation, devolves deeper into his or her pathology and ends up alone and even more isolated, completing the cycle of narcissistic self-destruction.

In the end, narcissists die alone and sycophants suffer stunted emotional and psychological growth, unless they grow strong enough to break their addiction and choose to value their own self-worth instead of abandoning it for the advancement of the narcissist.

I highly recommend anyone interested in the burgeoning narcissism epidemic read Twenge and Campbell’s excellent book. It is both eye opening and thought provoking.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from phlyzor wrote 14 weeks 1 day ago

from Hoski wrote 2 hours 22 min ago

pbshooter1217,
It's a common ailment. First one assigns oneself with superior knowledge and therefore anything someones else knows is inferior.
I think there's even a term for it...megalomania or something close.

Question: to whom are you referring? You? If I had a dime for every time you told me that you have already solved an issue that comes up on this blog, I'd have enough buy some cigarettes to trade a homeless guy for his vote.

If you don't like what he is posting then don't read it. Duh! You speak as though you HAVE to read everything he writes and then you HAVE to take the time to make comments on it. There just aren't enough hours in the day to be right on everything is there Hoski?

When did you get a sense of humor? I don't read everything you write, obviously, but I didn't see where you gave rat permission to post a funny.

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FirstBubba wrote 14 weeks 18 hours ago

Wanna know what's REALLY funny, phlyzor!

First off, Homaski considers me a "non-entity"(basically, I don't exist, ergo: there's a spook writing this! LOL!!)
Second off, Homask refuses to believe that Planned Parenthood not only TAKES U.S. Gov't tax dollars, it also provides, plans and arranges abortions, both outside and inhouse. Clinical and medicinal (Morning After pill!) abortions! All you gotta do is google "planned parenthood funding" and it will show you everything!
Recently, the Susan G. Komen Foundation pulled it's funding from PP! Suddenly, PP absolutely threw a wall-eyed fit that without the Komen Foundation's funding, they would not have the necessary funds to provide abortions.
Homaski claims that the PP books are the most closely audited in the nation! Too bad we don't keep as close a watch on the rest of Washington! BUT, my point is, Planned Parenthood STILL uses Gov't tax dollars to provide, plan and arrange abortions!
(You can't use the money to pay for abortions, but if you need forceps, syringes, instrument trays etc., etc.,....you can buy that!)
It's called playing fast and loose with the verbage!!!
The actual dollar may not make it to the abortionist hands, but his/her hands would be stained were the Gov't dollars dyed!!

Oh, Homaski! As a non-entity, I really don't expect any response, just expect you to google planned parenthood and do your own research!

Bubba

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 13 weeks 3 days ago

Wonder where my buddy clinch has been? Probably out participating in the incredible Tea Party grass movement that is going on that will be the major influence in this year's elections. GO CLINCH!!

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

I am not upset at all, in fact I am relieved to stop trying to educate the libtards.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 14 weeks 2 days ago

Especially young brats.

-3 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

bmxbiz-fs