Yeah, Green Bay losing surprized me some...I thought they'd go all the way.
Now, I gotta watch those Giants, man they played complete football.

I was a three spors guy in college, and a professional sports, couch potato now. Do not count out the 49'ers for sure. I thought Drew Breese and NO were the best team, and favorite to win the Super Bowl. I don't see anyone beating the 49'ers given they play like they did vs. N.O. Given that I see the only team without a chance as Baltimore...poor offense, and will eliminate them.

At this point I could not care less, Green Bay was my choice .

Here is something..just a point about what you mentioned. I don't buy this accepted notion that if a reciever can touch the ball...if it is on his finger tips, he should catch it, and if he doesn't it qualifies as a drop...totally a false assumption, and position. A hard thrown pass that zips off the finger tips shouldn't qualify as a drop. Passes thrown hard behind a guy that would be a great catch, but goes incomplete should not be regarded as a drop, nor a pass that is broken up before the guy can bring the ball in. Come on! They play back the pass, the receiver stretches out, and the defender gets an arm in there, and knocks it out...not a drop! Same thing goes with the call of a runner..."Putting the ball on the ground!" No he didn't. One of those massive defensive dudes with the gorilla arms, karate chopped the ball out of there! Those defensive guys are experts at causing a fumble. I just interpret what I see, as a football play, not a guy that "put the ball on the ground" Anyway...I say the 49'er defense is going to be better than NY defense, adn that will be the difference...49'ers win.

I know you mean "dropped balls" and there are certainly lots of dropped balls, and GB did have way too many dropped balls, BUT, I am talking about, at the end of the game how many passes are catargorized as drops that I say were not drops. Those announcers will play back a pass, and say it was a drop when it would have been a circus catch if the reciever would have caught it. Paid to catch doesn't make the difference to me. An incrdible reciever is that tight end for N.O. Now that guy can latch onto a pass like few others can, but not all are as good as that guy. Then on the fumble they criticize, and put blame on the runner not "putting the ball away high, not low. But no one runs that way. You have to do that anticipating the hit, and a lot of times it can't be anticipated. Jim Brown seldom fumbled, and he ran with the ball way out wide, as did Sayres and a lot of great running backs. But they were faster than defenders..now there is so much speed on the field and defenders skilled at stripping the ball. You had better go down rather than try to break tackles in a lot of situations. A pass over the middle that is high, and slightly behind, and a hard thrown ball? Few can come down with it..few want to go over the middle first off with a hit that can send you into Monday.

Year if the tight ends..big tall, strong bodies that you can just throw it up, and your guy has the best chance to come down with it.

So who in basketball? Pros or the college fellers. I O.D. on both.

What happened to my post? I think that Okla. St. beat the Sooners their last meeting, but no biggie. I like that NCAA March madness time. The little guy upsetting a biggie. No homecourt advantages, and no Dickie Vitale ruining a good game!!! I do like the Thunder even though they stole my Seattle Sonics!

How close were those match ups?! And how hard to those guys play? And they are union members? Think of that one. If only their union breatherin worked one hundredth that hard. Twer hoski, or the Rat, they might have called in sick yesterday.

Your right there except they would not have the cojones to step on the field with REAL NFL players!