Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Big Game Hunting

Ontario Spring Bear Hunt

Uploaded on May 27, 2013

I never had the opportunity to utilize the spring bear hunt in Ontario, but after having friends and family move to Northern Ontario and hearing their bear encounters, as well as having to worry about my three year old niece, I think it's time to bring it back. I've been researching and decided the way to bring this management tool, and the economic incentives that come with it, back to Ontario is through a mixture of fact-based and emotional (but still fact based) arguments. The bear hunt was cancelled based on emotions, I think emotions and facts can bring it back and provide relief for Ontario's north. If you have ideas or suggestions, I'd love to hear them.

Here's a start to a blog about Northern Ontario and the problems with black bears, the economy, and the decision to stop the spring hunt. Feel free to share and get information out there, the same way mailing 15,000 DVDs stopped the spring bear hunt.

Top Rated
All Replies
from FirstBubba wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

What stopped your hunt wasn't DVD's. What stopped your hunt was stupidity!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jhjimbo wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

Where is game management ?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sawkie wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

Game management is demonstrably incorrect, based on statements from the Ministry of Natural Resources spokesperson, who continues to use false statements to perpetuate the lies that keep votes for all political parties. "Bears are the second slowest reproducing land mammals" is a direct quote from their spokesperson. This is one of those statements that make an impact on the misinformed. The fact is Grizzly bears are the second slowest reproducing land mammals. Black bears are much more adaptable, and are the only type of bear in Ontario. They reproduce at double the rate of grizzly bears. This is the misinformation that has to be fought, as well as misinformation about hunting practices or the reason for those hunting practices. Fact based arguments do not work, so it's time to put a human element into our cause. Humans that are affected by the economic loss, and humans that are affected by the increased amount of bear-human encounters. That's what we are attempting to do, and we are hoping to get the word out. There's at least 36,000 extra bears in Ontario's bear population today from our previous stable population, and that's not good for both humans and bears.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary Devine wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

sawkie, I feel your pain. We had a New Jersey Governor named Jon Corzine who bowed to pressure from a small group of animal rights activists. Cozine a stinking Democrap stopped our fall black bear hunt for four years. New Jersey never had a spring bear hunt.
Your lucky Ontario still has a fall bear hunt.
It makes you wonder why most Sportsmen can't stand liberals in office. All they want to do is ban guns and stop hunting.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary Devine wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

That statement made by your Ministry of Natural Resources is untrue, "Bears are the second slowest reproducing land mammals".

He may have said that because sows go in heat every two years. Every time I put out my motion trail camera I get mature black bear sow with three to four cubs. A litter of five cubs is not uncommon. A young sow may have one to two cubs in her first litter.
Attached is a link I posted in the Field and Stream 2013 Spring Trail Camera Contest. The New Jersey sow is shown in this photo with four tiny cubs.

www.fieldandstream.com/contest_entry/1001489253?page=147&pnid=1001490045

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sawkie wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

It was the 1999 conservative Ontario government who put in the ban. Now it's just something that everyone passes the buck on.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sawkie wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

I would believe it was an accidental error if not for a lot of other misinformation being passed along from the MNR spokesperson. Statements like the bear population has not increased since 1999 (75,000-100,000 bears in Ontario is still used as the number). I took the numbers from studies on bears and doing the math on it, it shows that there should be at least 35,000 additional bears added to the population. Also, statements about bear-human encounters not being related to population or cancellation of the spring hunt, when following the spring hunt cancellation the numbers increased 500-600%, while Manitoba kept it's spring bear hunt based on the recommendation of it's own biologists, and they did not see the same increase, theirs has remained consistent.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply

from FirstBubba wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

What stopped your hunt wasn't DVD's. What stopped your hunt was stupidity!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jhjimbo wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

Where is game management ?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sawkie wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

Game management is demonstrably incorrect, based on statements from the Ministry of Natural Resources spokesperson, who continues to use false statements to perpetuate the lies that keep votes for all political parties. "Bears are the second slowest reproducing land mammals" is a direct quote from their spokesperson. This is one of those statements that make an impact on the misinformed. The fact is Grizzly bears are the second slowest reproducing land mammals. Black bears are much more adaptable, and are the only type of bear in Ontario. They reproduce at double the rate of grizzly bears. This is the misinformation that has to be fought, as well as misinformation about hunting practices or the reason for those hunting practices. Fact based arguments do not work, so it's time to put a human element into our cause. Humans that are affected by the economic loss, and humans that are affected by the increased amount of bear-human encounters. That's what we are attempting to do, and we are hoping to get the word out. There's at least 36,000 extra bears in Ontario's bear population today from our previous stable population, and that's not good for both humans and bears.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary Devine wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

sawkie, I feel your pain. We had a New Jersey Governor named Jon Corzine who bowed to pressure from a small group of animal rights activists. Cozine a stinking Democrap stopped our fall black bear hunt for four years. New Jersey never had a spring bear hunt.
Your lucky Ontario still has a fall bear hunt.
It makes you wonder why most Sportsmen can't stand liberals in office. All they want to do is ban guns and stop hunting.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary Devine wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

That statement made by your Ministry of Natural Resources is untrue, "Bears are the second slowest reproducing land mammals".

He may have said that because sows go in heat every two years. Every time I put out my motion trail camera I get mature black bear sow with three to four cubs. A litter of five cubs is not uncommon. A young sow may have one to two cubs in her first litter.
Attached is a link I posted in the Field and Stream 2013 Spring Trail Camera Contest. The New Jersey sow is shown in this photo with four tiny cubs.

www.fieldandstream.com/contest_entry/1001489253?page=147&pnid=1001490045

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sawkie wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

It was the 1999 conservative Ontario government who put in the ban. Now it's just something that everyone passes the buck on.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sawkie wrote 2 weeks 4 days ago

I would believe it was an accidental error if not for a lot of other misinformation being passed along from the MNR spokesperson. Statements like the bear population has not increased since 1999 (75,000-100,000 bears in Ontario is still used as the number). I took the numbers from studies on bears and doing the math on it, it shows that there should be at least 35,000 additional bears added to the population. Also, statements about bear-human encounters not being related to population or cancellation of the spring hunt, when following the spring hunt cancellation the numbers increased 500-600%, while Manitoba kept it's spring bear hunt based on the recommendation of it's own biologists, and they did not see the same increase, theirs has remained consistent.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Reply