By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Advocates of tougher gun laws are unable to understand the horror that shooters feel when the word “license” comes up. After all, say the anti-gunners, aren’t drivers licensed? And pilots, and just about anyone who has anything to do with anything that moves? Well, here’s an example why we don’t like licensing, and it happened to a co-worker of mine who had a permit to keep two handguns in his home in New York City.
Mr. M, as we will call him, moved from one borough of New York to another, and as required by law sent in his application for a new license with the new address, along with a money order for $340. Time went by, and nothing happened. When Mr. M called the New York City Police Department, he was told that his permit had been sent to him. Then, after much back and forth, he was told that the permit application had been lost (but not, apparently, the $340 money order). And then he was told that since he had not notified the NYPD of his move, his permit was revoked.
Then followed a Kafka-esque back and forth with the NYPD, who advised Mr. M that since he didn’t... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
For those of you who worry about the health and well-being of their smokeless powder, here’s a story.
Around 1980, I had a co-worker who was sunken-ship crazy, and since I was a Titanic and Edmund Fitzgerald nut, we found a lot to talk about. One day he came into my office with the grubbiest-looking .30/06 round I’d ever seen.
He explained that he’d bought the cartridge at an auction, and that it had been salvaged from the hulk of the U.S.S. San Diego, which had been sunk by a German submarine on July 19, 1918, off the coast of Fire Island, New York. (Or it may have hit a mine. No one knows for sure.)
“Do you think the powder’s any good?” my friend asked.
“Let’s find out,” said I, and punched a hole in the brass case with my thumbnail. Not that I have strong thumbnails, but the brass was corroded that badly. I poured some in a glass ashtray (yes, offices had ashtrays then) and, violating 25 building-safety codes, tossed a match (yes, people had matches in their desks then) into the powder.
Whoomp, it went, and burned with a brief, merry flame, just the way gunpowder is supposed to. And... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Here are a number of things that don’t fill me with confidence:
Condoleezza Rice, on her way to anywhere George W. Bush Dick Cheney wearing a game vest The TSA, doing anything Cops with gunsSince the first four are mostly outside the provenance of this blog, let’s talk about the fifth. What brings it up is a newspaper story revealing that on July 23, three New York City Police officers fired a total of 26 shots to kill a pit bull that was chewing on a fellow officer. The three who did the shooting were grazed by stray bullets.
According to police who commented on the incident, time seems to slow down in a violent encounter, and in that time officers keep on sending those rounds out. In this confrontation, one officer fired 13 rounds, another fired 12, and the third officer only one. No doubt he will be reprimanded. The officer who was being chewed on did not shoot, being otherwise occupied.
Most police officers nowadays are armed with automatic pistols that hold 16 or 17 shots and have double-action triggers that are guaranteed to prevent accidental discharges but are also guaranteed to prevent accurate... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
To put this in perspective, you must be aware that if you are left-handed, and spend all your spare time looking at fine guns, you will go about 15 years before you see a fine shotgun that’s stocked for a southpaw. And then another 15 before you see the next one. No kidding.
And so in 1990 or so, when I walked into my gunsmith’s shop and he had a smile of purest evil on his face, I knew it was trouble, and I was right. In lieu of cash, a customer who owed him a lot of money had given him a Perazzi Special Sporting o/u shotgun. It had a color-case-hardened receiver, special wood, a spare trigger group, ten screw-in chokes, and it had been stocked to fit him at the Grand American Trap Shoot at Vandalia, Ohio, right at the Perazzi booth.
And it was stocked for a southpaw. I mounted it, and there was no doubt that this gun was made for me. The guy they built it for had been at Vandalia, but it was meant for me. It... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
One of the dumbest pieces of conventional wisdom I’ve ever heard is that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Spare me. Does anyone think that Angelina Jolie is a skank? Does anyone think that Rosie O’Donnell is a babe?
Ugly things are depressing not only because they are awful to look upon, but because most of them didn’t have to be ugly. Firearms are no exception. It’s no more trouble to make something with graceful and harmonious lines than it is to create an aesthetic abomination. That is, assuming that the designer has artistic talent and not just mechanical ability.
Through the history of firearms, many of the most effective guns have also been the most graceful—the Kentucky rifle, the Springfield Model 03, the Colt Peacemaker, the Winchester Model 12, the Savage Model 99. Gun designers who put ugly firearms on the market should be sealed in a room where the collected speeches of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) are played at a deafening volume for all eternity. [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Fellow gun nuts: We hear from each other, from gun writers, and from manufacturers, but gun dealers give us a perspective that we don’t get elsewhere. Scott Moss, who is the third generation of that family (all of whom have taken lots of money from me) to sell firearms, has agreed to come on the blog from time to time and tell us what’s on his mind, good or bad, about the guns he handles. If you’re interested in buying from him or selling to him on consignment, you can call Forest & Field, Norwalk, CT 203-847-4008.—Dave Petzal
The Ruger Gold Label Shotgun
MSRP: $2,050.00
Contact: www.Ruger.com
You know what I really dislike? Gun manufacturers who hype guns that don't exist. As soon as a magazine publishes an article about a new gun that isn't in production, the phone calls start and I have to tell my customers the item isn’t available and probably won’t be for 6-12 months.
A case in point is Ruger, which announced the P85 9mm handgun three years before I had one in my case. ... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Did you ever watch a raccoon “washing” something it’s about to scarf down? Odds are that the coon’s ideas of hygiene are very poorly formed, but it washes anyway because it can’t help itself. When it comes to shooting, I'm pretty much the same way.
Take 16-yard trap. I use a tight Full choke even though enlightened opinion says that you should use Improved Mod or even Mod. Wow, I say to myself, I sure am blowing them birds apart. I also use 3-dram-equivalent shells a lot for the same reason, even though you get hammered a lot less with 2 3/4 drams.
I always take 30 rounds of ammo on a big-game hunt, despite the fact that the only time I ever used anything like that much was the first three times I went to Africa. The last three times I’ve gone I’ve fired five rounds, on average. And in North America it’s about the same.
My rifle barrels get cleaned to within an inch of their lives, even though you don’t have to go that far. Stop, stop, they shriek, you’re killing us.
But at least now when I now work up a load for a rifle, I don’t go out... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
In April 1996, Layne Simpson, Gary Sitton, Finn Agaard and I met at gunmaker Kenny Jarrett’s South Carolina establishment to do a massive and earth-shaking piece on deer rifles. In the spare time I had, I went rooting (not unlike a hog after truffles) through Kenny’s inventory room where he keeps finished guns and found a left-hand .30/06 based on a Remington Model 700 action.
It was a demonstrator gun that Kenny kept around to show his southpaw customers, but it was not quite glamorous enough for that purpose, being all black (no camo or Confederate flags) and in the distinctly unglamorous .30/06. And it was heavy--8 1/2 pounds without scope.
But I loved it at first sight, and when Kenny quoted me a price that was less than the Bolivian GNP, I said I’d buy it if he sawed off the muzzle brake, so he did, and I did. Smartest money I ever spent. When they come to pry my gun from my cold dead fingers, this is the rifle they will pry.
It is not only very accurate (groups... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
A while back the subject of bedding a barrel came up, and was shunted aside for something more glamorous. But it’s important, and here’s some stuff worth knowing:
When a rifle is fired, its barrel twangs; I’m told by an engineer who has studied the subject that if you could watch it in slow motion, the tube would appear to appear to shimmy like a snake (waddle like a duck; that’s the way you do when you do the huckle buck).
Anyway, the purpose of bedding the barrel is to make sure the damn thing shimmies exactly the same way for every shot. The easiest way to bed a barrel is not to bed it—free-float the sucker from where the chamber swell tapers down right out to the end. Then let it do whatever it wants. Most factory rifles are made this way because it’s cheap and usually works very well.
Melvin Forbes of New Ultra Light Arms beds his fore-ends so they just touch the barrel. There’s no pressure, but there is a dampening effect. Melvin is able to do this because his Kevlar-graphite stocks are as rigid as I-beams, and once they’re bedded they stay put forever.
Top-line custom gunmakers who work... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Dear Dave, I have read your recent articles regarding the .325 WSM and the Browning A-Bolt. I am planning an elk and mule deer hunt out West in the next year or two and had been thinking about the Ruger No. 1 in 300 Win. Mag. I am not sure if Ruger offers the No. 1 in .325 WSM yet. After reading your articles, I had thought about the No. 1 in .325 WSM. What are your thoughts about the Ruger and the .325 for elk and mule deer? Thanks for your advice.--Jim Stewart
Jim, My experience with the Ruger No. 1 is that it's a very fussy and erratic rifle. I've seen some that shoot extremely well, but usually they've been to the gunsmith before they would do it. As for the .325, it's way too much for mule deer, but just about right for elk. Its only drawback as an elk round is that once in a while you get a long shot at an elk, and unless your .325 will shoot 200-grain bullets accurately, it can be a problem at long distances.
If it were me, and I was going to hunt both species, I'd get a .270--perfect for... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Dave, I have an Ithaca Deerslayer slug gun (rifled barrel) that, with scope and saboted Winchester Supreme ammo, gives me 4-inch groups at 100 yards with the occasional flyer going out to 6 inches. I've killed deer with it, but the hits were not where I thought they'd be, and I'm looking for something more accurate. The local gun gurus say I should buy a box of every slug made and see what groups best, but I'm not looking forward to shooting box after $12 box of shells through this little cannon.
Are my expectations too high? Should I trade the gun? -- Daniel Beetz, York, ME
Daniel, I owned a Deerslayer slug gun in the early 90s, and have the subdural hematomas to remind me of it. The thing had a 15-pound trigger and weighed about 6 1/2 pounds, and while it shot OK for the time it would throw flyers just as your gun does. Slug-gun design has come a long way since the Deerslayer, and I'd sell it and look for something more modern.--DP [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
I do a lot of traveling, and everywhere I go, people ask me the same questions:
How can you stand to work in New York City?
How did the media get to be anti-gun in the first place?
The answer to the first question is that you get numb after a while. As to the second question, there are three answers. The first is that people tend to hire like-minded people, regardless of profession.
To be a Detroit auto executive, for example, your mind must be frozen in the year 1955, regardless of whether you were around then or not. U.S. Marines, although highly individualistic, tend to think very much alike. Same with newspaper reporters, TV news bunnies, etc. No one wants a real iconoclast making everyone uncomfortable, and if everyone in the newsroom is anti-gun, NRA members are not going to be welcome.
Second, just about all journalists are products of what we call higher education, and if there is one place where independent thinking is dead, that is on college campuses. If it’s politically incorrect, you’d better not say it, write it, or even think it, or you’ll find yourself with straight Fs, no friends, and probably mandatory visits to the school... [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
Gentlepersons: I have a new S & W 44 magnum "AirLite" (Model 329PD). Can you believe it jams? If further interested, please get back with me.--Lonso L. Leinonen
No, I'm not a bit surprised. None of the .44 magnum S&Ws are particularly strong guns, considering the cartridge. My Model 29 needed a new hand and pawl after only a couple of hundred rounds. If you'd like a .44 Mag that doesn't screw up, get a Ruger Redhawk.--DP [ Read Full Post ]
By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily
I'm looking to buy one of these rifles based on their good price and rating. My only problem is deciding which caliber. I'm leaning towards the .300 Win Mag as I already have a Remington Model 760 in .270. Do you think this gun is too light at 6.5 lbs.for this caliber? Or should I sell the Remington and buy a Stevens in 30.06? What would be a good scope for the .300 Win Mag. I was thinking of a Weaver Grand Slam. Any help with this dilemma would be appreciated.--Ken (via email)
Ken, I used a .300 Win Mag for a number of years and am not a fan. Too much recoil for what it can do, and any 6.5-pound rifle in that caliber will knock you sideways. If you want a bolt-action, I'd sell the Remington and get a Savage in .270. And the Weaver Grand Slam is an excellent choice. Great scope for the money.--DP [ Read Full Post ]