Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

A Memorable Gun: Colt New Service Revolver

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

October 17, 2008

A Memorable Gun: Colt New Service Revolver

By David E. Petzal and Phil Bourjaily

From time to time I like to write about guns that have stuck in my mind over the years, even though I saw them only briefly. This is about a Colt New Service revolver in .45 Long Colt that fell into the hands of a talented gunsmith who made it into something altogether different.

The New Service was in continual production from 1898 until 1944. It was a monstrously big revolver, and you needed a magnum-sized hand to shoot the damned thing. Over 360,000 were produced in many different barrel lengths and 11 different calibers. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police adopted it, and The New York State Police carried the New Service in .45 Long Colt, in a holster supported by a Sam Brown belt. Above the revolver were two rows of the big cartridges. An old-time trooper once told me that the gun and the ammo hung right at eye level as you approached an automobile, and that it seemed to calm down excited drivers. Like most of the old Colts, they were beautifully made, inside and out.

Anyway, the troopers eventually phased out the New Service, and they could be had pretty cheaply. A very talented gunsmith friend of mine got one, and made what was known as a belly gun out of it. He chopped the barrel back to 3 inches and replaced the blade front sight with a big bead. He ground off the hammer spur and slicked up the innards for a flawless double-action pull. He cut off the front of the trigger guard so you could get at the trigger faster, and carved a pair of custom grips to fit his hand. The formerly huge, awkward revolver was now fast and sleek—or as sleek as something that big could be.

Loaded with hot handloads, it would make a believer out of anyone, and was lightning-fast out of a holster. In these effete days of 9mm automatics, it is something out of another era. If you’re thinking of getting a New Service and doing the same thing, I wish you luck. Even the plain ones, in good shape, now cost $1,000, and the scarcer models are worth a lot more. --DP

from eddie far. wrote 5 years 24 weeks ago

unc, we have a colt new service da revolver, chrome, w/pearl grips, 7.5 inch w/grip lanyard. bottom of grips stamped 1917 w/ s/n 317xxx. condition almost flawless. some slight wear .grips beautiful. can you provide some info and approx value. this colt is to be handed down to my son,cal .45 or .45 long colt. thank you

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr. R: Based on Jim in MO's information, you ought to leave that Model 1912 "as is". Besides being a family heirloom it sounds like a real classic and it's way too valuable to modify. You can most certainly use plastic shells, they won't harm the gun. And they're a whole lot easier to reload if you can find someone who will do it for you. Although with a gun that old, you may want to stick with factory loads. Good luck.p.s. That was awfully nice of Jim to look up that info for you. Totally out of character for him, but awfully nice nonethe less!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr R,Just looked your gun up in Fjestads blue book. Should have done that before. You are correct sir, the 2 1/2 in. chamber was manufactured till 1927 when 2 3/4 became standard. From what I can tell the 1912 was manufactured from 1912-1919. At 80% condition it has a value of $700. From what I've seen Fjestad values guns on the low side as compared to others. Also thats not a shelf price, that would be much higher.Oh by the way. You should see the price had that been a 28 ga.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Thanks Flip and Jason... the gun says distinctly 2 1/2" chamber and MODEL 1912 on the barrel not Model 12. Grandpa got it for his 13th birthday in 1917 or so the story goes. At the very least it has been in our family 91 years and I would hope for another 91. The last thing I want to do is mess it up, so I will get the 2 1/2" paper shells and go at it!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

DEP-I saw a similar "cut down" .45 in a pawnshop several years ago. I don't recall if it was a Colt or aS&W, but the trigger guard had been milled down to about half it's original width, hammer bobbedand smoothed, NO front sight and all edges milled down. Interestingly enough, the cylinderwas cut out to allow use of .45 ACP with the half moon clips. I was told it was a gambler's "hideout gun."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dave, the Colt New Service is, I agree, a really good gun and the custom job described sounds pretty nifty. But it's the .45 Long Colt cartridge that's more interesting to me. Our departed mutual friend, Skeeter Skelton, joined Charlie Askins, one r two other guys and me on a Colt invitational mule deer handgunning hunt some years ago.Skeeter used a Colt Peacemaker in that caliber with his handloads for the (successful) hunt. I used the then new 8-inch-barreled Python. Handloaded, the already impressive factory ballistics of the .45 LC cartridge is awesome.Speaking of Skeeter--a few years earlier, I had to wonder what kind of a guy with a handle like that could he be? (I'm reminded of Johnny Cash's tune, "A Boy named Sue").Turned out that Skeeter was one of the nicest, most knowledgeable, top-shooting pistolero mans'- man I'd ever met.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JasonB wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph:Check out http://www.rstshells.comThey sell 2 1/2" 12 ga. shells. They have a pretty good selection of the older, shorter shells for most guages.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Show me Jim,A few years ago I shot a few rounds of skeet with an obnoxious fellow that was shooting Federal paper shells. AHHHHH the memories that smell brought back.BTW NOS but, have you noticed the embarrassment the Chiefs have become?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SD Bob wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Since I've never seen one of these revolvers, I agree with the others that photo's of the aforementioned gun being held by Miss Cuthbert would help me understand the beauty that would be beheld! In fact it should be a new Gun Nut blog edict that any new topic should include an obligatory picture! How about the top of the page across from Dave's "thinking man's" pose?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

So if a .45 increases yr pucker factor, what happens if you're staring down a S&W 500?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Looking into the barrel of ANYTHING that is .45 caliber will increase your pucker factor. Supposedly a Texas Ranger was asked why he carried a Colt 45. His reply was because they don't make a .46!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Flip,I do not doubt anything you wrote but when I said 'swell' I should have clarified that by 'swell after firing'. Although I don't know if thats the case, it just seems plausible.PS. I'm old enough to remember those paper shells. As a boy of 13 there was no shell or cartridge that smelled so great when sniffed after firing.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph: Be careful with that old Win. M-12 and 2 3/4" shells. Check the barrel and see if it's stamped 2 1/2" or 2 3/4". I may be wrong (senile?) but I think I remember reading way back when that Winchester made some M-12's with 2 1/2" chambers. If so, you DO NOT want to fire 2 3/4" shells in a 2 1/2" chamber. It's like firing a 3" shell in a 2 3/4" chamber. Definite "no-no" pressure wise. The longer shell will fit in the shorter chamber, but when fired that extra 1/4" of unfolded crimp can't "unfold" in the chamber and does so in the smaller diameter forcing cone. And since the shot charge doesn't compress very well at that point, pressure really spikes. The other hint that you may have a 2 1/2" chamber was your comment that 2 3/4" shells don't eject well and "hang up". If you can't tell from what's stamped on the barrel, have a gunsmith check it. If you do have the shorter chamber, the smith MAY be able to ream the chamber to accept the longer shells. That doesn't help your ejection problem, but at least you can fire the longer shells safetly.P.S. The plastic shells don't swell, but the old paper ones will if they get wet or even damp. And I think Cabela's may still carry 2 1/2" shells. Good luck.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

To Dr. Ralph: Thanks for coming to my defense.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Jim that's what I'm talking about. Re-living the past and hunting as Grandpa did with a new puppy... sort of a connection between the old and new. I'm hoping "someone" up above will be watching and bless us both. Hunting is already a spiritual thing for me and mine and this just adds to the experience.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Of course if you do the above you will also have to change your attire. You'll need to wear knickers and sleeveless Pendleton sweaters. Also learn to smoke a pipe.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Meant to add the only problem I can see is it doesn't like the plastic compared to the paper shells it was designed for. I imagine the plastic swells a bit.Here's a downright legitimate excuse to go buy those more expensive paper shells that Federal makes. Tell the wife gramps would have wanted it that way.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

2 1/2 in. shells are the 2 3/4. Measure unfired shell its 2 1/2 in. When fired its 2 3/4.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Does anyone have any experience shooting 2 3/4" shotgun shells out of an old Winchester Model 1912 that has a 2 1/2" chamber? I have tried it a few times just so I can say I have shot Grandpa's gun and they load fine but when ejected seem to hang up... Who sells 2 1/2" shotgun shells? I'd like to take Blondie on her first real hunt and know where to find some quail which I thought would be the hard part but now I'm worried about the gun and I want this to be a memory that lasts forever. Any help would be appreciated sorry about the subject change.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Does anyone even read the original blog? DAVE'S FRIEND HACKED UP THE HEIRLOOM COLLECTOR'S QUALITY PIECE NOT DAVE... DAVE'S INNOCENT!! Well, at least of these particular charges.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sarg wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

no pics necessary Dave, same as with some older S&W models are still fresh in my memory.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Duck Creek Dick wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Dave can and should be forgiven for butchering up a fine revolver. It happenend years ago and the revolver wasn't valuable at the time. Besides, Dave didn't know any better. I,too, am not without sin. What I did to my,as new, Remington-made 1903 Springield in gunsmithing school still makes me blanch. I redeemed myself somewhat by acquiring a S&W third model (1926 Model .44 Military) with a ground-off hammer spur. With a replaced hammer, it still resides in my gun safe after 43 years.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Interesting how some of the old hardware sticks in your mind. I remember firing an old gentleman's Remington rolling block in 7x57mm as a 13 year-old. He explained that he got it from Bannerman's years before at "a decent price". At 13, I didn't have much centerfire or deer cartridge experience and though it was huge, but I enjoyed that piece. Almost 49 years later, I still remember that rifle - a lastingly good impression. I'm aware that Remington is producing the rolling block on a limited basis again through their custom shop, but nostalgia doesn't have that great a hold on me to spend what they currently cost. The memory is a good one, and I continue to cherish that. I've passed my .30-30 (with plinker loads) to a number of young shooters to give them the opportunity to fire it, and I hope the memory fuels their future as responsible shooters.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Duck & Dr Ralph,I'm with you both on fouling up valuable antique heirlooms. I confess that I was tempted once to do some radical customizing to the Colt New Service (it's been a working gun all its life and it shows...) But you will be as pleased that I dismissed that bad idea as my wife is pleased that I dismissed looking at pictures of Elisha Cuthbert!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Show Me Jim... have you ever watched the Purina Dock Dog Challenge? I think Blondie is secretely practicing for this competition. She runs and jumps up and lands face first in the sink then claws her way up with her hind paws. Good link at my name.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Another correction. Supposedly these Moro Tribesmen wrapped leather straps around their "privates" driving them crazy so that the pain inflicted by a .38 Special was nothing compared to the self induced pain. The .45 just flat out knocked them on their asses...Oh and thanks Duck Creek Dick... I was feeling a little guilty about my opening post on Dave's last blog reaming him for advocating long range shots with unmanageable cartridges, but you upped the ante reaming him for f***ing up valuable antique firearms. Just remember, it's when they stop talking bad about you that you have to worry Dave...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Self Correction: It's spelled "Fillipino". And it wasn't Fillipinos but Moro Tribesmen. And technically it wasn't the Spanish American War but the Phillipine Insurgency which followed.Still the 45 LC was indisputably effective = "Instances have repeatedly been reported during the past year where natives have been shot through and through several times with a .38 caliber revolver, and have come on, cutting up the unfortunate individual armed with it…. The .45 caliber revolver stops a man in his tracks, usually knocking him down…. " General Leonard Wood, 1904

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

I'd like to see that belly gun also (you can keep the Elisha Cuthbert photos) the New Service cylinder has got to be more than 2 inches in diameter -- it'd make quite the "belly gun" in my opinion!My Dad showed me his New Service revolver when I was about 12 years old -- he kept it hidden behind books on the shelf in his law office. It was quite the gun compared to the colt police in 38 short that I had tinkered with and accidentally discharged into my parents bed... Fortunately, no one was in bed.Nevertheless, I'm surprised that Dave thinks it takes magnum sized hands to shoot it. The grips are surprisingly small and grippable! Today, my 14 year old wears it as a side arm when we hunt together. He shoots it well (at least single action) and he's loaded some good rounds with 250 grain Hornady hollow points -- sub-sonic, but I'm confident they'll do in a pinch as a bear stopper. The 45 Long Colt did stop drug crazed Phillipinos during the Spanish American War!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bernie Kuntz wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

John Taffin writes handgun-related features for THE AMERICAN HANDGUNNER, and he is above all else, an aficionado of the revolver. His articles usually are illustrated with photos of plain Jane revolvers that he has had customized and the actions smoothed out by one of a relative handful of gunsmiths who know how to do such things. Most of the handguns are enough to make a guy drool down his chin!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Canadian Lurker wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Dave gave a pretty good description. He also said he saw the gun fleetingly. Use your imagination, no need por pictures.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jersey pig wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

nice, tease us all up with talk and then dont finish with pics.reminds me of a girl i knew.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scrap5000 wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Pics would be nice, Dave!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Calm down some drivers?Staring down the large hole of that gun would cause some folks to talk in tongues.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Will someone please wildcat a true .45 Short Colt so that I don't get taken aback whenever someone mentions a .45 Long Colt. Same thing happens to me when people refer to their magazine as a clip, or a BMW car as a Beemer. (A Beemer is a BMW motorcyle. A BMW car is a Bimmer.)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from doccherry wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

A close friend, right before he died, handed me a Colt New Service, 1919 manufacture, in 44/40. It was RCMP with a lanyard ring. "It's yours," he said. I was floored. I've since shot it a few times and every time I do, my departed friend is standing right next to me. That's the way he wanted it, I'm sure.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SDB wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

How about a photo of that "belly gun" -- I'd like to see that.And more Elisha Cuthbert, too.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Duck Creek Dick wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Dave's next blog will detail how to "customize" your grandpas heirloom Parker.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from eddie far. wrote 5 years 24 weeks ago

unc, we have a colt new service da revolver, chrome, w/pearl grips, 7.5 inch w/grip lanyard. bottom of grips stamped 1917 w/ s/n 317xxx. condition almost flawless. some slight wear .grips beautiful. can you provide some info and approx value. this colt is to be handed down to my son,cal .45 or .45 long colt. thank you

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr. R: Based on Jim in MO's information, you ought to leave that Model 1912 "as is". Besides being a family heirloom it sounds like a real classic and it's way too valuable to modify. You can most certainly use plastic shells, they won't harm the gun. And they're a whole lot easier to reload if you can find someone who will do it for you. Although with a gun that old, you may want to stick with factory loads. Good luck.p.s. That was awfully nice of Jim to look up that info for you. Totally out of character for him, but awfully nice nonethe less!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr R,Just looked your gun up in Fjestads blue book. Should have done that before. You are correct sir, the 2 1/2 in. chamber was manufactured till 1927 when 2 3/4 became standard. From what I can tell the 1912 was manufactured from 1912-1919. At 80% condition it has a value of $700. From what I've seen Fjestad values guns on the low side as compared to others. Also thats not a shelf price, that would be much higher.Oh by the way. You should see the price had that been a 28 ga.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Thanks Flip and Jason... the gun says distinctly 2 1/2" chamber and MODEL 1912 on the barrel not Model 12. Grandpa got it for his 13th birthday in 1917 or so the story goes. At the very least it has been in our family 91 years and I would hope for another 91. The last thing I want to do is mess it up, so I will get the 2 1/2" paper shells and go at it!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

DEP-I saw a similar "cut down" .45 in a pawnshop several years ago. I don't recall if it was a Colt or aS&W, but the trigger guard had been milled down to about half it's original width, hammer bobbedand smoothed, NO front sight and all edges milled down. Interestingly enough, the cylinderwas cut out to allow use of .45 ACP with the half moon clips. I was told it was a gambler's "hideout gun."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dave, the Colt New Service is, I agree, a really good gun and the custom job described sounds pretty nifty. But it's the .45 Long Colt cartridge that's more interesting to me. Our departed mutual friend, Skeeter Skelton, joined Charlie Askins, one r two other guys and me on a Colt invitational mule deer handgunning hunt some years ago.Skeeter used a Colt Peacemaker in that caliber with his handloads for the (successful) hunt. I used the then new 8-inch-barreled Python. Handloaded, the already impressive factory ballistics of the .45 LC cartridge is awesome.Speaking of Skeeter--a few years earlier, I had to wonder what kind of a guy with a handle like that could he be? (I'm reminded of Johnny Cash's tune, "A Boy named Sue").Turned out that Skeeter was one of the nicest, most knowledgeable, top-shooting pistolero mans'- man I'd ever met.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JasonB wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph:Check out http://www.rstshells.comThey sell 2 1/2" 12 ga. shells. They have a pretty good selection of the older, shorter shells for most guages.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Show me Jim,A few years ago I shot a few rounds of skeet with an obnoxious fellow that was shooting Federal paper shells. AHHHHH the memories that smell brought back.BTW NOS but, have you noticed the embarrassment the Chiefs have become?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SD Bob wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Since I've never seen one of these revolvers, I agree with the others that photo's of the aforementioned gun being held by Miss Cuthbert would help me understand the beauty that would be beheld! In fact it should be a new Gun Nut blog edict that any new topic should include an obligatory picture! How about the top of the page across from Dave's "thinking man's" pose?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

So if a .45 increases yr pucker factor, what happens if you're staring down a S&W 500?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Looking into the barrel of ANYTHING that is .45 caliber will increase your pucker factor. Supposedly a Texas Ranger was asked why he carried a Colt 45. His reply was because they don't make a .46!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Flip,I do not doubt anything you wrote but when I said 'swell' I should have clarified that by 'swell after firing'. Although I don't know if thats the case, it just seems plausible.PS. I'm old enough to remember those paper shells. As a boy of 13 there was no shell or cartridge that smelled so great when sniffed after firing.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph: Be careful with that old Win. M-12 and 2 3/4" shells. Check the barrel and see if it's stamped 2 1/2" or 2 3/4". I may be wrong (senile?) but I think I remember reading way back when that Winchester made some M-12's with 2 1/2" chambers. If so, you DO NOT want to fire 2 3/4" shells in a 2 1/2" chamber. It's like firing a 3" shell in a 2 3/4" chamber. Definite "no-no" pressure wise. The longer shell will fit in the shorter chamber, but when fired that extra 1/4" of unfolded crimp can't "unfold" in the chamber and does so in the smaller diameter forcing cone. And since the shot charge doesn't compress very well at that point, pressure really spikes. The other hint that you may have a 2 1/2" chamber was your comment that 2 3/4" shells don't eject well and "hang up". If you can't tell from what's stamped on the barrel, have a gunsmith check it. If you do have the shorter chamber, the smith MAY be able to ream the chamber to accept the longer shells. That doesn't help your ejection problem, but at least you can fire the longer shells safetly.P.S. The plastic shells don't swell, but the old paper ones will if they get wet or even damp. And I think Cabela's may still carry 2 1/2" shells. Good luck.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

To Dr. Ralph: Thanks for coming to my defense.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Jim that's what I'm talking about. Re-living the past and hunting as Grandpa did with a new puppy... sort of a connection between the old and new. I'm hoping "someone" up above will be watching and bless us both. Hunting is already a spiritual thing for me and mine and this just adds to the experience.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Of course if you do the above you will also have to change your attire. You'll need to wear knickers and sleeveless Pendleton sweaters. Also learn to smoke a pipe.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Meant to add the only problem I can see is it doesn't like the plastic compared to the paper shells it was designed for. I imagine the plastic swells a bit.Here's a downright legitimate excuse to go buy those more expensive paper shells that Federal makes. Tell the wife gramps would have wanted it that way.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

2 1/2 in. shells are the 2 3/4. Measure unfired shell its 2 1/2 in. When fired its 2 3/4.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Does anyone have any experience shooting 2 3/4" shotgun shells out of an old Winchester Model 1912 that has a 2 1/2" chamber? I have tried it a few times just so I can say I have shot Grandpa's gun and they load fine but when ejected seem to hang up... Who sells 2 1/2" shotgun shells? I'd like to take Blondie on her first real hunt and know where to find some quail which I thought would be the hard part but now I'm worried about the gun and I want this to be a memory that lasts forever. Any help would be appreciated sorry about the subject change.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 26 weeks ago

Does anyone even read the original blog? DAVE'S FRIEND HACKED UP THE HEIRLOOM COLLECTOR'S QUALITY PIECE NOT DAVE... DAVE'S INNOCENT!! Well, at least of these particular charges.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from sarg wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

no pics necessary Dave, same as with some older S&W models are still fresh in my memory.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Duck Creek Dick wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Dave can and should be forgiven for butchering up a fine revolver. It happenend years ago and the revolver wasn't valuable at the time. Besides, Dave didn't know any better. I,too, am not without sin. What I did to my,as new, Remington-made 1903 Springield in gunsmithing school still makes me blanch. I redeemed myself somewhat by acquiring a S&W third model (1926 Model .44 Military) with a ground-off hammer spur. With a replaced hammer, it still resides in my gun safe after 43 years.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Interesting how some of the old hardware sticks in your mind. I remember firing an old gentleman's Remington rolling block in 7x57mm as a 13 year-old. He explained that he got it from Bannerman's years before at "a decent price". At 13, I didn't have much centerfire or deer cartridge experience and though it was huge, but I enjoyed that piece. Almost 49 years later, I still remember that rifle - a lastingly good impression. I'm aware that Remington is producing the rolling block on a limited basis again through their custom shop, but nostalgia doesn't have that great a hold on me to spend what they currently cost. The memory is a good one, and I continue to cherish that. I've passed my .30-30 (with plinker loads) to a number of young shooters to give them the opportunity to fire it, and I hope the memory fuels their future as responsible shooters.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Duck & Dr Ralph,I'm with you both on fouling up valuable antique heirlooms. I confess that I was tempted once to do some radical customizing to the Colt New Service (it's been a working gun all its life and it shows...) But you will be as pleased that I dismissed that bad idea as my wife is pleased that I dismissed looking at pictures of Elisha Cuthbert!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Show Me Jim... have you ever watched the Purina Dock Dog Challenge? I think Blondie is secretely practicing for this competition. She runs and jumps up and lands face first in the sink then claws her way up with her hind paws. Good link at my name.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Another correction. Supposedly these Moro Tribesmen wrapped leather straps around their "privates" driving them crazy so that the pain inflicted by a .38 Special was nothing compared to the self induced pain. The .45 just flat out knocked them on their asses...Oh and thanks Duck Creek Dick... I was feeling a little guilty about my opening post on Dave's last blog reaming him for advocating long range shots with unmanageable cartridges, but you upped the ante reaming him for f***ing up valuable antique firearms. Just remember, it's when they stop talking bad about you that you have to worry Dave...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Self Correction: It's spelled "Fillipino". And it wasn't Fillipinos but Moro Tribesmen. And technically it wasn't the Spanish American War but the Phillipine Insurgency which followed.Still the 45 LC was indisputably effective = "Instances have repeatedly been reported during the past year where natives have been shot through and through several times with a .38 caliber revolver, and have come on, cutting up the unfortunate individual armed with it…. The .45 caliber revolver stops a man in his tracks, usually knocking him down…. " General Leonard Wood, 1904

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

I'd like to see that belly gun also (you can keep the Elisha Cuthbert photos) the New Service cylinder has got to be more than 2 inches in diameter -- it'd make quite the "belly gun" in my opinion!My Dad showed me his New Service revolver when I was about 12 years old -- he kept it hidden behind books on the shelf in his law office. It was quite the gun compared to the colt police in 38 short that I had tinkered with and accidentally discharged into my parents bed... Fortunately, no one was in bed.Nevertheless, I'm surprised that Dave thinks it takes magnum sized hands to shoot it. The grips are surprisingly small and grippable! Today, my 14 year old wears it as a side arm when we hunt together. He shoots it well (at least single action) and he's loaded some good rounds with 250 grain Hornady hollow points -- sub-sonic, but I'm confident they'll do in a pinch as a bear stopper. The 45 Long Colt did stop drug crazed Phillipinos during the Spanish American War!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bernie Kuntz wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

John Taffin writes handgun-related features for THE AMERICAN HANDGUNNER, and he is above all else, an aficionado of the revolver. His articles usually are illustrated with photos of plain Jane revolvers that he has had customized and the actions smoothed out by one of a relative handful of gunsmiths who know how to do such things. Most of the handguns are enough to make a guy drool down his chin!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Canadian Lurker wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Dave gave a pretty good description. He also said he saw the gun fleetingly. Use your imagination, no need por pictures.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jersey pig wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

nice, tease us all up with talk and then dont finish with pics.reminds me of a girl i knew.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scrap5000 wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Pics would be nice, Dave!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Calm down some drivers?Staring down the large hole of that gun would cause some folks to talk in tongues.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Will someone please wildcat a true .45 Short Colt so that I don't get taken aback whenever someone mentions a .45 Long Colt. Same thing happens to me when people refer to their magazine as a clip, or a BMW car as a Beemer. (A Beemer is a BMW motorcyle. A BMW car is a Bimmer.)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from doccherry wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

A close friend, right before he died, handed me a Colt New Service, 1919 manufacture, in 44/40. It was RCMP with a lanyard ring. "It's yours," he said. I was floored. I've since shot it a few times and every time I do, my departed friend is standing right next to me. That's the way he wanted it, I'm sure.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SDB wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

How about a photo of that "belly gun" -- I'd like to see that.And more Elisha Cuthbert, too.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Duck Creek Dick wrote 5 years 27 weeks ago

Dave's next blog will detail how to "customize" your grandpas heirloom Parker.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment