Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Petzal: And Now, A Really Manly Handgun

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 05, 2009

Petzal: And Now, A Really Manly Handgun

By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily

My thanks to Tom McIntyre for this one.

In the beginning was the .357 Magnum, and it was good, and then the .44 Magnum, which was much better, and made Clint Eastwood famous and Elmer Keith happy. Eventually, though, rumblings of discontent were heard throughout the land, and there followed the .454 Casull, and the .475 Linebaugh, and the .480 Ruger, and the .460 and .500 S&W, and hand surgeons everywhere rejoiced. But in Switzerland, a gentleman named Zeliska felt the need for something bigger, and so he went, money in hand (lots of money) to the firm of K. Pfeifer Waffen in Feldkirch, Austria and Herr Pfeifer did him proud.
51CA27F3D4F643CAB67B49F8DC19E826

The Pfeifer single-action revolver is chambered for the .600 Nitro Express cartridge. This round, which dates from the early 20th century, is an elephant whomper so extreme that very few rifles have been made for it. The .600 fires a 900-grain bullet at 1,950 fps, produces 3 1/2 tons of muzzle energy, and is three times more powerful than a .500 S&W magnum.

The Pfeifer revolver weighs 13.3 pounds, is just under 22 inches long, has a ported 13-inch barrel, walnut grips, and gold-plated hammer, ejector, screws, and cylinder pin. The rear sight is adjustable, and the price is $16, 501. If you’re not man enough to hack the .600, you can get the gun in .458 Winchester, but you should be wary of also developing an interest in Judy Garland recordings and Broadway musicals.
Personally, I will wait until Herr Pfeifer comes out with a .50 BMG version. Watch the video to see the .600 in action.



Comments (3)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

You don't need a cannon to put a man down plus RMH is like 74 years old and under 100 pounds. .44-40's have been used in the Boer War and the wild west with much success just stay away from those "cowboy loads".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dean J wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I don't think that's a big enough caliber to be used for self defense. He should try something more manly.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky MtnHunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph: Good to see you in print again. I am a gun nut, WHY???? never will I know. But as weboth agree, $$$$ in firearms now is a better bet than the DOW or CD's. I;ve bought/sold/traded hundreds of firearms and never lost a dime on any of them.Some I had to spend a few $ to repair, but then was in a position to make a profit. As for the 44-40, I always wanted a large caliber western type firearm ( I wanted to be a Cowboy), but I did not want the average run of the mill 45's, so selected the 44-40 so would have a handgun that few have, especially in my local area. It;s a Uberti imported by Stoeger from Italy, case harden, Walnut grips and 5 l/2 " bbl. Just the right size for me and my smaller hands.As for Deer in the South, my Son and I did well with bucks on our farm. I gota dandy 9 and my Son got a monster 8, plus he also got a spotted deer. We plant food plots, put our mineral licks and try to entice teh deer to hang around our property. The 8 we killed, we had seen only 4 prior to season, but knew there was a couple huge deer in the area. I killed the 9 pointer on opening day with my Inline B/P at l70 yds. My first deer with a B/P gun was a 4"Oak tree, so stopped that business by adding a scope zeroed at l50 yds.Now can see deer rather than trees. I do think the Western states are blowing wind about the many animals available on BLM land. They may be areas wher the average guy can;t get to that holds some nice animals,but as a rule the raange I hunted this past year sucked. When you don't even see w-tails, something is amiss. That eing teh Big Cugar my wife saw at l0-15 yds and the many wolf tracts, not countin the Coyotes,.The western states ae bambozolling the much game to sell us NR licenses, as the game depts operate on our Money not the locals as my tags were 653.00 and the same for the locals was 38.00. But, they got the Elk, Lopes, Mulies and we don;t. Just hope that the herd of Elk in KY wandes down into N.C. while I'm able to hunt, or I either draw a tag for KY, but the odds are about lK to l to draw. THe application fee is l4.00 so not to break the bank to apply. i also will apply in PA. Either of these stats are within 350 miles of me and I want have to fly,can load up my camper and go. Ok, hopefully they can cull the Blue tongue and hae a healthy herd, but I understand it's headed eastward. Take care, Shoot-um-straight and often: the old Gun Slinger. PS; Do you know what the cost of a Elk Hunt in New Mexico cost?Also, does SE C0 have many Mulies and Lopes? My Son want to go.Chat with you again. Hey, buy that new Pistol orwhat-ever it is. One last thin, many yrs ago I bought a new H&H 410 sawed the bbl to l6" and cut the stock off at the grip,sanded, sawed to make a kinda pistol grip. That was back when We roade horses a lotin the Blue Ridge Mtns and was a god snake gun.I addeda shot sling to hang on the saddle horn to carry the gun. Yep, still got it after about 40 yrs.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Up close with a handgun big&fat puts 'em down. Out to 100yds a big&fat rifle cartridge puts 'em down. Elmer knew what he was talking about.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Wish I had my money in guns about now RMH... and you know for a carry gun the .44-40 is probably perfect. G. Gordon Liddy who I listened to every day for 10 years always preferred a very large slow moving projectile for self defense, and he was an FBI agent for a very long time. Seems fast projectiles blow right through an enemy while the very large slower projectiles transfer all their energy and pick people up and throw them down. In his opinion a .44 Special was better than a .44 Magnum. Shoot 'em straight and often! Last weekend for me, our season closes Monday. No bucks just a handful of does this year. It could be worse as the deer population took a severe blow by the blue tongue or whatever they're calling it now disease...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky MtnHunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

With tons of $$$ you can have any gun you desire built. Bu to me, this looks like a supped up contender breakaction. No use for my hunting.I will just continue to use my Uberti 44-40 and be happy. For my style hunting it'sample for me. Just as deadly as teh 44 mag and a tad smaller, but large enough. Us gun nuts never get enough of the wall guns, and never will. I recall when I began hunting at l0 yrs old ( I'm now 74) a single shot 16 gauge was the finest gun ever made.The I bought a Winchester 94 when was l6 and went on my first deer hunt and was ruined for life. I don;t want all the guns made, just l of each, by far better investment than in the DOW or banks. The Old Gunslinger

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Since the caliber designation is up for grabs, it's good that we can hang a different hat on cartridges of the same bore size.How else would the inexperienced buy the correct .308 or .224 ammo? Or better yet, answer the spousal question: "Don't you already have a .308 something or other?"LOL

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 007 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Wonder if anybody makes an ankle holster for it? The ultimate car gun because nobody could carry it around, it'd have to be kept somewere, perhaps mounted on the roof. haha.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Ross Seyfried usually stopped at .475 Linebaugh, and no rifle calibers, because as "eyeball" stated, Ross had a certain criteria for "handgun." Even Ross advises that the .45 Colt should be enough as a day-to-day gun, with the .475 and .500 Linebaugh cartridges reserved only for the biggest game (including, if the hunter is so determined, elephant). Here he advises that before parting with his money buying the Linebaughs, the hunter should sit in a dark corner for maybe a week and really be honest with himself, because these guns are not only expensive custom jobs, but also really kick and can spook a shooter forever.As for caliber designation, whether in English or metric, I think Mr. Petzal has already made it clear that the whole system is UNCLEAR. Even the Germans, source of most of the world's precision, had dual 7.92s, one .318" and another .323", the latter being the hotter load. But what is common with most cartridges, IMO, is that the designation is usually smaller than groove diameter, which may or may not be the bore diameter. Thus, we say .30 or .300 for .308, the British say .303 instead of .311. We have .270 for .277, etc.Of course we have the .38 Special (.357), which ruins things, and we have various .224s that are designated .220 (Swift),.222 (Rem), .223 (Rem), .224 (Wby) and .225 (Win).So Mr. Petzal is still right. The convention or system for designating cartridge calibers is totally messed up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Ed J.,7.91? Maybe a German gunsmith with too much St. Paully Girl in him measured the outside diameter of the barrel by mistake!Seriously have you had anyone spec that barrel, do you feel your getting good velocities?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Alright. You know you want it. You know you can't afford it. But imagine holding one of these monsters in your hand... it would be like being 5 years old again and shooting a .357 Mag. It would take you back to a place in time where everything was too big and the world was a wonderful exciting place.Besides the video is a 6 lb. T/C in .600 Nitro Express, not the Pfeifer Zeliska 13 lb. monstrousity. I'm sure it would only blow you half way out of the picture...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Ahnold wants one! I will be revealing my age here but when I was a wee lad I remember an article by Elmer Kieth in Guns & Ammo magazine and he had a revolver made in .45/70. I remember that the recoil of that monster was pretty stout.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Troy M. Stirman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

That's not a HANDGUN- it's a funny looking CARBINE!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I was just looking at some of the loads for the contender pistol. A 30-06 would seem a bit unruley with recoil for a handgun. Very powerful pistols! Could that have been what he was shooting? I still want one with like a 16'' barrel, though!I do agree that this vid is not of the gun mentioned in the article.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Zermoid wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

They are called RIFLE calibers for a reason............I think the reason the only other people in that video were at the far end of the range was that no one else was stupid enough to be anywhere near that thing when it went off!44 Mag is enough handgun for me.Those folks are NUTS!At what point do people wise up and stop going Bigger?I can picture some fool making a rifle to chamber a 40mm round someday soon, someone, somewhere, will be both bored and stupid enough to try it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

A fool and his money are soon parted. Unless one was a masochist, who would ever shoot that monstrosity more than once? Many people think the .45 ACP kicks too much. Anyway, I wish I had the money he spent for that weapon so that I could pay off all my debt.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Dave,What next? How about a derringer chambered for a 105mm howitzer round.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Jim in MoYour on the right track, even in agreement with Lazzeroni.think of the old way of making a barrel. Drill the hole then cut the groove. Some makers called the drill size the caliber others like SAAMI call the dia of the projectile the size.So why does the barrel on my 7X57 Mauser have 7.91 stamped on it?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Yoop, and Ed J,Thanks for help.Yoop, when you started talking chemistry you lost me.Ed J., your talking groove vs. land (bore),?It still doesn't make sense. Does SAAMI make the rules now and tell how things should be measured or can I build a gun and measure at the lands and state this is the diameter and you build one and measure at the grooves and say something else?. To me .308 equals 7.82 not 7.62.But I'm a hard headed German, everything should be measured the same so everyone can be on the same page.Thanks again

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Jim in MoThey are just trying to confuse you by mixing up the groove diameter and the bore diameter.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bella wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I remember the name of the 11mm pinfire revolver, they were called the Gaz and they were humongus, maybe not quite as big as the .60 caliber number but they were biggest handgun of their day. Anybody seen a Gaz? or fired one?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Jim in Mo:The conversion factor; inches to mm is 25.4 mm = 1". There are 0.03937" in one mm. Multiply that by 7.62 mm. It equals 0.30. For some reason, I remember the 25.4 from chemistry back in 1974. Don't ask how. I think its the only thing I remember.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Red wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Seems somebody took the T-rex thread a little too seriously.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Coop,Thats the same conversion calculator I used a couple weeks ago when I asked about the true metric size of my '06. Go back to it and enter 7.62 and then 7.82. Its the later that comes up with .308. What gives any and all?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

WOW.Not even a .577 Tyrannosaur rifle blows you out of the picture!But as to these powerful handguns, though you may think that the guys who come up with bigger and bigger handguns are plumb loco (and this last one in .600 Nitro probably is), there is a legit reason for them. I'm going to tell you all something that even Ross Seyfried, who normally loved over the edge guns, never figured out.See, Ross figured that a gun had to fit in a holster and be 'packable' or it wasn't a handgun. He didn't approve of bolt actions, glass sights, etc. on his handguns.But Ross lived in the West. If you live in, oh, say, Wisconsin, there are laws forbidding you from using a centerfire rifle for deer or etc. below a certain latitude (a certain east west highway, in fact). South of that line it was shotgun and handgun yes (proving the handgun is .357, .41. .44 Magnum or equivalent), .30-30 rifle no.Some of you might not believe it, but right here on this very earth there are hunters who just want to bag a deer when they hunt. Any deer. They are not bloodthirsty poachers or market hunters, but working guys who live in town and can only get away to hunt a couple of weekends a year (I'm one of them), and that usually on public land. And they (I) would rather come home with a spike buck or a doe (where legal) than dream about antlers.With that in mind, the term 'handgun' covers a lot of ground. Get yourself a Contender in any decent caliber, put a scope on it, and most of the disadvantages of the holster gun are gone. Lawmakers who are against the Model 94 in .30-30 don't seem to realize that the Contender in 7mm Waters or Encore in any caliber you want (or one of the new S&W monster revolvers) can outshoot the Winchester .30-30 all day long, at any range.So. They may be huge and crazy, but thanks to the hand cannons the lawmakers are happy, and the hunters are happy. Ross wasn't happy, but not even he could be right all the time.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I kinda wonder, if my best friend showed me that pistol, and said "look what I just bought". Would I still think of him as highly as I did? You would have to wonder if there isn't some kind of psychological problem. I also wonder, with the weight and bulk of the monster, wouldn't someone be just as safe, carrying a rifle of lesser caliber, but much easier to shoot?BTW, when buying my rifle, the input I received from you folks was relied on 100 per cent. I would use that same logic if buying a pistol.Thanks Again!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Sorry, but the only photo of you I could find was the big Saskatchewan buck picture and you bear a striking resemblance... besides they say it's a famous gunwriter holding the weapon on my other link about the revolver. And my motto is "often wrong, never in doubt", Dave's the one who's never wrong.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

You could tell the fella shooting it was a little antsie about the recoil! I wonder if it broke his wrist?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Yep, just like some of my favorite rifle purveyor's racks are full of the super ultra magnums after hunting season with tags that read "Consignment", or "Only detached 1 retina", or "Hardly used, only one broken clavicle"! LOLAll of a sudden, the .30-06 is an adequate cartridge again....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Lyn wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Anyone ever look at the the high number of .44 mag., .454, .480's available on the gun auction sites?There's plenty available....why one might ask??? Recoil baby (directly associated with----PAINFUL to shoot), and cost of ownership of course.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jd wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

looks just like a magnum research bfr to me, if it is a 600 better him than me good luck.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom McIntyre wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

PS Note to Dr. Ralph at 4:34 pm Jan. 5--"Looks like a Contender to me... stainless steel and black composite too with the extended trigger guard like T/C's and #1's. Definitely not the revolver McIntyre is holding." Well, that's definitely not me in the photo; I've never had the, shall we say, pleasure of handling one of those hand-ICBMs and am, of course, far better looking. I suspect that might be Zeliska or somebody from the Pfeifer factory. Never wrong, Doc?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dartwick wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

This is getting stupid the same way sandwich joints get stupid trying to make the biggest burger.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dartwick wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

This is getting stupid the same way sandwich joints get stupid trying to make the biggest burger.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from KJ wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

This looks like something to own so you can say you own it - "Mine is bigger than yours."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom McIntyre wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Since Herr Petzal has seen fit to out me as the source of this outrageous scandal, let me offer a few unsolicited thoughts about the Pfeifer Zeliska Revolver. At over 13 pounds it is within a pound or two in weight of the average .600 rifle, mitigating recoil--somewhat. If you click on the Pfeifer link above, you can see a still photo of the pistol being fired at a bench with, apparently, only moderate effect, except for the pronounced blink of the shooter. Look for the Zeliska in some upcoming action/adventure movie--"Indiana Jones and the Fortress of Deafness," perhaps, or "The Bells of St. Mary's Won't Quit Ringing." The Pfeifer site also has another extreme firearm, the magically named "Liliput" .22 Hornet, which at 1.3 kilograms and 91 cm in length is, it goes without saying, "die absolut leichteste Schonzeitbüchse überhaupt."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Well, Dave, I think that handgun vies with the Gyroject for "worst handgun ever made." It's a marriage of the world's least useful cartridge with the worst qualities of a handgun (inaccuracy) and the worst qualities of a squad support weapon (weight).Definitely not my cup o' coffee, but if someone has the money and the desire, good on 'em for keeping firearms craftsmen employed and innovating.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

What a dipstick. Maybe that knot on his forehead will teach him a lesson, but probably not....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from semp wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Ahhhhh, this is just about as asinine as that dickweed who hunts with .50 BMG bullpup.Take enuff gun, but purposeful pain just blows!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Deerprofessor wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Really? Do we really need this hand cannon? This is just what Congress needs to ban all large bore handguns. It has no practical purpose and does NOT look fun to shoot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from smokey0347 wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

How many stitches did he need? His face should be all messed up by watching the video. Can we all agree that he obviously 'ate' that scope? LOL And I agree, looks like a Contender in the vid, not a revolver!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from John C. wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I am not sure that he could even legally fire this handgun in Switzerland.I lived in Switzerland while on a temporary assingnment for work, and while shooting ranges are quite common, everyone of them that I saw had restrictions on what types of guns could be fired.Of course, I could be mistaken, as the signs at all the ranges were in German (Swiss German), and/or French.Even if he could legally fire it. I imagine the people who live in the area surrounding his local shooting range would object to the excessive noise.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mick wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I don't think a revolver in this caliber would be a good idea, at least not with more than one chamber loaded. It's not safe to have loaded guns flying around!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from chance wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I dont recall reading where mr petzal says the gun in the video and the new fancy revolver are one and the same. he does say to watch the video to see the .600 in action. If i recall correctly it is a contender that someone built for themselves or something like that. I got it in a fwd fwd fwd email once awhile back. I recall a much larger guy shooting it though.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dickgun wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Clay,I agree with you about the AK 454 Casull shooters. On the other hand, I bought one - a 4" 5/8 bbl field gun with conventional sights, finally, from Wayne at Casull Co.after a lot of conversations with him at Conventions. I do not like to shoot it, but I CAN shoot it. I worked my way up with a .44magS&W a lot of years ago and the same techniques apply only more so. I carry it in a shoulder rig when I am flying in big bear country or otherwise as may be needed. I have never had to use it in anger. But, with the 300 gr max round it is impressive. Sights do not mean much when you need that gun - instinctive shooting takes over (like the old western gunslingers).

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Bella check this outSAE to/from Metric conversionhttp://www.worldwidemetric.com/metcal.htm

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Bella45 Cal 45ACP(.451) is 11.46mmand60 Cal is 15.24mm

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jersey pig wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

when will 1 be available for CCW purposes?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I don't know where the 3 times more powerful than a .500 S&W came from. I'm guessing Ross would say something like "how about 3 times more powerful than a 30-06?"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

if it weighs 13 pounds anyway, and obviously doesn't handle like a Model 19 Smith, why not simply have a double rifle made for the same cartridge? If it's a Krieghoff, it can probably be had for the same 16 thousand dollars.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Has Zeliska ever actually fired his new toy? Just wondering.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Looks like a girlie gun to me. Best to place that first shot prudently as the repeats will be slow in coming.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Back in the 19th century Some Hiungarian guy invented an 11mm revolver (it may have been pinfire), The name is on the tip of my toungue and I just can't come up with it...Anyway the King of Montenegro thought these huge 11mm revolvers were his ticket to national security so he decreed that every Montenegran adult male would carry one of these monsters at all times. I think it might be a fair compitition to this .60 caliber big shot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

David, the blast from that 600 muzzle break would have blown the tin right off the roof!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Tennessee Hunter GuyI must respectfully disagree with you Sir. The #1 bar far backup gun is a Ruger Mark II 22 pistol and a pair of tennis shoes. Shoot your hunting partner in the ankle and run like hell !!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I remember those 454 Casull shooters in Alaska and telling them both state and federal law requires taking the John Deer Plow front sight off that cannon. WHY? When you shoot that Kodiak it’s going to swipe it out of your hands and shove it up your _____!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Dave,I'm not so much for fantasy but I read more than my fair share of science fiction. Have you ever thought of changing your writing career.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cl;ay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Dave probably a 50 S&W

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Mr. Zeliska has more money than I have sheets of toilet paper.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tennessee Hunter Guy wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

the ultimate backup gun for africa

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

P.S. Don't forget to take the muzzlebreak off and shoot it once just to see how hard it really kicks...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

No need to wait Dave, Pfeifer has your revolver now! Guiness World Record Revolver. 28mm, 25.4mm to an inch... hmmmmmm.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Looks like a Contender to me... stainless steel and black composite too with the extended trigger guard like T/C's and #1's. Definitely not the revolver McIntyre is holding. Cool video though, did the guy hit himself in the face or not is what my son and I are arguing over.Go to my link it shows the same .600 Nitro T/C and the same guys. Never wrong Dave?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Look how long that thing is! At what point does a handgun become a rifle?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I'm with CRM - If he'd shot a revolver of .600 NE caliber the least of his worries would have been shooting the light load. Looking for his fingers in the next county would have been what he'd be up to.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

U-Tube video is a ContenderFirst it is definately a break action, second is thedistinctive trigger guard, and third, no shooter of revolvers ever places his off hand foreward of the cylinder like that twice.I wonder if they will ever find anyone to actually shoot the Pfeifer revolver?Makes my puny little .41 and .44 mags look like mouse guns!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dickgun wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I note that the firing range seemed to be empty as he prepares to fire. Wonder why?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

To Nit-Picker: You may be right. It looked like he broke the gun to load it, and as far as I can see, the Pfeifer doesn't break. Anyone else with any intel?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Of course it has a gold plated hammer! For some reason the word "compensating" and the phrase, "hey ya'll watch this..." come to mind.Some where Elmer is sitting under that big old hat calling Bull$&!#on such pieces of hardware. But I bet he does have a bit of a grin on his face...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nit-picker wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Dave,I'm not sure that's the same gun--looked like a Contender action to me.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Geez......

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from George wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Do we have time to order a set for Obama and Biden?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

So, is that like a slow pushing recoil of a .480 Ruger, or the intense slapping recoil of the .454 Casull? Ah, if it hits you in the head anyway, what does it matter?Looks like a pith helmet or hard hat should be standard equipment with this beast, along with a leather gauntlet and a hired revolver carrier. Maybe add shooting sticks and a counterweight hanging off the barrel. I know! Add a shoulder stock.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scrap5000 wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

OH...MY...FRICKING...GOD

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I saw that vid on youtube a while ago. Amazing gun! Just make your first shot count if you are carrying it as protection, because by the time you recover about 5 minutes later...well.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

This cannon falls into the general category "If you build it, someone will buy it." There will always be that segment or market that delights in owning the extremes, whether it makes sense or not. Other than filling a niche as an expensive conversation piece, I don't know what role such a handgun would fill. Maybe my tastes are too traditional or classical, but it's not an attractive, practical or intelligent choice for most handgunners, and I infer that Mr. Zeliska has more resources than judgment or experience as a handgun hunter, but I wish him years of shooting satisfaction (or bragging rights) with this oddity.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from pineyhunter wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

does the word "overkill" come to mind?for what purpose would anyone want to own such a monster?other than the fact that somebody can afford this beast and it would definitely make a reliable and interesting conversation piece.yes i'm sure it will get you that trophy you always wanted or save your life from a charging elephant.but after that save, how is it going to protect you from the next predator who comes around and you just happen to be walking around the african plains still dazed and confused from the first shot with possibly 2 broken arms or dislocated shoulders,etc.?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dbarry wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

Want that kinda pain, with a lot less $$, try one of the smith & wesson 13oz 357's with full power loads - or just hold an M80 with some kevlar gloves! :o)

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

You don't need a cannon to put a man down plus RMH is like 74 years old and under 100 pounds. .44-40's have been used in the Boer War and the wild west with much success just stay away from those "cowboy loads".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dean J wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I don't think that's a big enough caliber to be used for self defense. He should try something more manly.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky MtnHunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph: Good to see you in print again. I am a gun nut, WHY???? never will I know. But as weboth agree, $$$$ in firearms now is a better bet than the DOW or CD's. I;ve bought/sold/traded hundreds of firearms and never lost a dime on any of them.Some I had to spend a few $ to repair, but then was in a position to make a profit. As for the 44-40, I always wanted a large caliber western type firearm ( I wanted to be a Cowboy), but I did not want the average run of the mill 45's, so selected the 44-40 so would have a handgun that few have, especially in my local area. It;s a Uberti imported by Stoeger from Italy, case harden, Walnut grips and 5 l/2 " bbl. Just the right size for me and my smaller hands.As for Deer in the South, my Son and I did well with bucks on our farm. I gota dandy 9 and my Son got a monster 8, plus he also got a spotted deer. We plant food plots, put our mineral licks and try to entice teh deer to hang around our property. The 8 we killed, we had seen only 4 prior to season, but knew there was a couple huge deer in the area. I killed the 9 pointer on opening day with my Inline B/P at l70 yds. My first deer with a B/P gun was a 4"Oak tree, so stopped that business by adding a scope zeroed at l50 yds.Now can see deer rather than trees. I do think the Western states are blowing wind about the many animals available on BLM land. They may be areas wher the average guy can;t get to that holds some nice animals,but as a rule the raange I hunted this past year sucked. When you don't even see w-tails, something is amiss. That eing teh Big Cugar my wife saw at l0-15 yds and the many wolf tracts, not countin the Coyotes,.The western states ae bambozolling the much game to sell us NR licenses, as the game depts operate on our Money not the locals as my tags were 653.00 and the same for the locals was 38.00. But, they got the Elk, Lopes, Mulies and we don;t. Just hope that the herd of Elk in KY wandes down into N.C. while I'm able to hunt, or I either draw a tag for KY, but the odds are about lK to l to draw. THe application fee is l4.00 so not to break the bank to apply. i also will apply in PA. Either of these stats are within 350 miles of me and I want have to fly,can load up my camper and go. Ok, hopefully they can cull the Blue tongue and hae a healthy herd, but I understand it's headed eastward. Take care, Shoot-um-straight and often: the old Gun Slinger. PS; Do you know what the cost of a Elk Hunt in New Mexico cost?Also, does SE C0 have many Mulies and Lopes? My Son want to go.Chat with you again. Hey, buy that new Pistol orwhat-ever it is. One last thin, many yrs ago I bought a new H&H 410 sawed the bbl to l6" and cut the stock off at the grip,sanded, sawed to make a kinda pistol grip. That was back when We roade horses a lotin the Blue Ridge Mtns and was a god snake gun.I addeda shot sling to hang on the saddle horn to carry the gun. Yep, still got it after about 40 yrs.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Up close with a handgun big&fat puts 'em down. Out to 100yds a big&fat rifle cartridge puts 'em down. Elmer knew what he was talking about.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Wish I had my money in guns about now RMH... and you know for a carry gun the .44-40 is probably perfect. G. Gordon Liddy who I listened to every day for 10 years always preferred a very large slow moving projectile for self defense, and he was an FBI agent for a very long time. Seems fast projectiles blow right through an enemy while the very large slower projectiles transfer all their energy and pick people up and throw them down. In his opinion a .44 Special was better than a .44 Magnum. Shoot 'em straight and often! Last weekend for me, our season closes Monday. No bucks just a handful of does this year. It could be worse as the deer population took a severe blow by the blue tongue or whatever they're calling it now disease...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky MtnHunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

With tons of $$$ you can have any gun you desire built. Bu to me, this looks like a supped up contender breakaction. No use for my hunting.I will just continue to use my Uberti 44-40 and be happy. For my style hunting it'sample for me. Just as deadly as teh 44 mag and a tad smaller, but large enough. Us gun nuts never get enough of the wall guns, and never will. I recall when I began hunting at l0 yrs old ( I'm now 74) a single shot 16 gauge was the finest gun ever made.The I bought a Winchester 94 when was l6 and went on my first deer hunt and was ruined for life. I don;t want all the guns made, just l of each, by far better investment than in the DOW or banks. The Old Gunslinger

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Since the caliber designation is up for grabs, it's good that we can hang a different hat on cartridges of the same bore size.How else would the inexperienced buy the correct .308 or .224 ammo? Or better yet, answer the spousal question: "Don't you already have a .308 something or other?"LOL

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 007 wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Wonder if anybody makes an ankle holster for it? The ultimate car gun because nobody could carry it around, it'd have to be kept somewere, perhaps mounted on the roof. haha.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Ross Seyfried usually stopped at .475 Linebaugh, and no rifle calibers, because as "eyeball" stated, Ross had a certain criteria for "handgun." Even Ross advises that the .45 Colt should be enough as a day-to-day gun, with the .475 and .500 Linebaugh cartridges reserved only for the biggest game (including, if the hunter is so determined, elephant). Here he advises that before parting with his money buying the Linebaughs, the hunter should sit in a dark corner for maybe a week and really be honest with himself, because these guns are not only expensive custom jobs, but also really kick and can spook a shooter forever.As for caliber designation, whether in English or metric, I think Mr. Petzal has already made it clear that the whole system is UNCLEAR. Even the Germans, source of most of the world's precision, had dual 7.92s, one .318" and another .323", the latter being the hotter load. But what is common with most cartridges, IMO, is that the designation is usually smaller than groove diameter, which may or may not be the bore diameter. Thus, we say .30 or .300 for .308, the British say .303 instead of .311. We have .270 for .277, etc.Of course we have the .38 Special (.357), which ruins things, and we have various .224s that are designated .220 (Swift),.222 (Rem), .223 (Rem), .224 (Wby) and .225 (Win).So Mr. Petzal is still right. The convention or system for designating cartridge calibers is totally messed up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Ed J.,7.91? Maybe a German gunsmith with too much St. Paully Girl in him measured the outside diameter of the barrel by mistake!Seriously have you had anyone spec that barrel, do you feel your getting good velocities?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Alright. You know you want it. You know you can't afford it. But imagine holding one of these monsters in your hand... it would be like being 5 years old again and shooting a .357 Mag. It would take you back to a place in time where everything was too big and the world was a wonderful exciting place.Besides the video is a 6 lb. T/C in .600 Nitro Express, not the Pfeifer Zeliska 13 lb. monstrousity. I'm sure it would only blow you half way out of the picture...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Ahnold wants one! I will be revealing my age here but when I was a wee lad I remember an article by Elmer Kieth in Guns & Ammo magazine and he had a revolver made in .45/70. I remember that the recoil of that monster was pretty stout.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Troy M. Stirman wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

That's not a HANDGUN- it's a funny looking CARBINE!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I was just looking at some of the loads for the contender pistol. A 30-06 would seem a bit unruley with recoil for a handgun. Very powerful pistols! Could that have been what he was shooting? I still want one with like a 16'' barrel, though!I do agree that this vid is not of the gun mentioned in the article.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Zermoid wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

They are called RIFLE calibers for a reason............I think the reason the only other people in that video were at the far end of the range was that no one else was stupid enough to be anywhere near that thing when it went off!44 Mag is enough handgun for me.Those folks are NUTS!At what point do people wise up and stop going Bigger?I can picture some fool making a rifle to chamber a 40mm round someday soon, someone, somewhere, will be both bored and stupid enough to try it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

A fool and his money are soon parted. Unless one was a masochist, who would ever shoot that monstrosity more than once? Many people think the .45 ACP kicks too much. Anyway, I wish I had the money he spent for that weapon so that I could pay off all my debt.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Dave,What next? How about a derringer chambered for a 105mm howitzer round.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Jim in MoYour on the right track, even in agreement with Lazzeroni.think of the old way of making a barrel. Drill the hole then cut the groove. Some makers called the drill size the caliber others like SAAMI call the dia of the projectile the size.So why does the barrel on my 7X57 Mauser have 7.91 stamped on it?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Yoop, and Ed J,Thanks for help.Yoop, when you started talking chemistry you lost me.Ed J., your talking groove vs. land (bore),?It still doesn't make sense. Does SAAMI make the rules now and tell how things should be measured or can I build a gun and measure at the lands and state this is the diameter and you build one and measure at the grooves and say something else?. To me .308 equals 7.82 not 7.62.But I'm a hard headed German, everything should be measured the same so everyone can be on the same page.Thanks again

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ed J wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Jim in MoThey are just trying to confuse you by mixing up the groove diameter and the bore diameter.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bella wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I remember the name of the 11mm pinfire revolver, they were called the Gaz and they were humongus, maybe not quite as big as the .60 caliber number but they were biggest handgun of their day. Anybody seen a Gaz? or fired one?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Jim in Mo:The conversion factor; inches to mm is 25.4 mm = 1". There are 0.03937" in one mm. Multiply that by 7.62 mm. It equals 0.30. For some reason, I remember the 25.4 from chemistry back in 1974. Don't ask how. I think its the only thing I remember.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Red wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Seems somebody took the T-rex thread a little too seriously.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Coop,Thats the same conversion calculator I used a couple weeks ago when I asked about the true metric size of my '06. Go back to it and enter 7.62 and then 7.82. Its the later that comes up with .308. What gives any and all?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

WOW.Not even a .577 Tyrannosaur rifle blows you out of the picture!But as to these powerful handguns, though you may think that the guys who come up with bigger and bigger handguns are plumb loco (and this last one in .600 Nitro probably is), there is a legit reason for them. I'm going to tell you all something that even Ross Seyfried, who normally loved over the edge guns, never figured out.See, Ross figured that a gun had to fit in a holster and be 'packable' or it wasn't a handgun. He didn't approve of bolt actions, glass sights, etc. on his handguns.But Ross lived in the West. If you live in, oh, say, Wisconsin, there are laws forbidding you from using a centerfire rifle for deer or etc. below a certain latitude (a certain east west highway, in fact). South of that line it was shotgun and handgun yes (proving the handgun is .357, .41. .44 Magnum or equivalent), .30-30 rifle no.Some of you might not believe it, but right here on this very earth there are hunters who just want to bag a deer when they hunt. Any deer. They are not bloodthirsty poachers or market hunters, but working guys who live in town and can only get away to hunt a couple of weekends a year (I'm one of them), and that usually on public land. And they (I) would rather come home with a spike buck or a doe (where legal) than dream about antlers.With that in mind, the term 'handgun' covers a lot of ground. Get yourself a Contender in any decent caliber, put a scope on it, and most of the disadvantages of the holster gun are gone. Lawmakers who are against the Model 94 in .30-30 don't seem to realize that the Contender in 7mm Waters or Encore in any caliber you want (or one of the new S&W monster revolvers) can outshoot the Winchester .30-30 all day long, at any range.So. They may be huge and crazy, but thanks to the hand cannons the lawmakers are happy, and the hunters are happy. Ross wasn't happy, but not even he could be right all the time.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

I kinda wonder, if my best friend showed me that pistol, and said "look what I just bought". Would I still think of him as highly as I did? You would have to wonder if there isn't some kind of psychological problem. I also wonder, with the weight and bulk of the monster, wouldn't someone be just as safe, carrying a rifle of lesser caliber, but much easier to shoot?BTW, when buying my rifle, the input I received from you folks was relied on 100 per cent. I would use that same logic if buying a pistol.Thanks Again!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 4 weeks ago

Sorry, but the only photo of you I could find was the big Saskatchewan buck picture and you bear a striking resemblance... besides they say it's a famous gunwriter holding the weapon on my other link about the revolver. And my motto is "often wrong, never in doubt", Dave's the one who's never wrong.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

You could tell the fella shooting it was a little antsie about the recoil! I wonder if it broke his wrist?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Yep, just like some of my favorite rifle purveyor's racks are full of the super ultra magnums after hunting season with tags that read "Consignment", or "Only detached 1 retina", or "Hardly used, only one broken clavicle"! LOLAll of a sudden, the .30-06 is an adequate cartridge again....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Lyn wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Anyone ever look at the the high number of .44 mag., .454, .480's available on the gun auction sites?There's plenty available....why one might ask??? Recoil baby (directly associated with----PAINFUL to shoot), and cost of ownership of course.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jd wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

looks just like a magnum research bfr to me, if it is a 600 better him than me good luck.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom McIntyre wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

PS Note to Dr. Ralph at 4:34 pm Jan. 5--"Looks like a Contender to me... stainless steel and black composite too with the extended trigger guard like T/C's and #1's. Definitely not the revolver McIntyre is holding." Well, that's definitely not me in the photo; I've never had the, shall we say, pleasure of handling one of those hand-ICBMs and am, of course, far better looking. I suspect that might be Zeliska or somebody from the Pfeifer factory. Never wrong, Doc?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dartwick wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

This is getting stupid the same way sandwich joints get stupid trying to make the biggest burger.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dartwick wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

This is getting stupid the same way sandwich joints get stupid trying to make the biggest burger.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from KJ wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

This looks like something to own so you can say you own it - "Mine is bigger than yours."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tom McIntyre wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Since Herr Petzal has seen fit to out me as the source of this outrageous scandal, let me offer a few unsolicited thoughts about the Pfeifer Zeliska Revolver. At over 13 pounds it is within a pound or two in weight of the average .600 rifle, mitigating recoil--somewhat. If you click on the Pfeifer link above, you can see a still photo of the pistol being fired at a bench with, apparently, only moderate effect, except for the pronounced blink of the shooter. Look for the Zeliska in some upcoming action/adventure movie--"Indiana Jones and the Fortress of Deafness," perhaps, or "The Bells of St. Mary's Won't Quit Ringing." The Pfeifer site also has another extreme firearm, the magically named "Liliput" .22 Hornet, which at 1.3 kilograms and 91 cm in length is, it goes without saying, "die absolut leichteste Schonzeitbüchse überhaupt."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Well, Dave, I think that handgun vies with the Gyroject for "worst handgun ever made." It's a marriage of the world's least useful cartridge with the worst qualities of a handgun (inaccuracy) and the worst qualities of a squad support weapon (weight).Definitely not my cup o' coffee, but if someone has the money and the desire, good on 'em for keeping firearms craftsmen employed and innovating.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

What a dipstick. Maybe that knot on his forehead will teach him a lesson, but probably not....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from semp wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Ahhhhh, this is just about as asinine as that dickweed who hunts with .50 BMG bullpup.Take enuff gun, but purposeful pain just blows!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Deerprofessor wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Really? Do we really need this hand cannon? This is just what Congress needs to ban all large bore handguns. It has no practical purpose and does NOT look fun to shoot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from smokey0347 wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

How many stitches did he need? His face should be all messed up by watching the video. Can we all agree that he obviously 'ate' that scope? LOL And I agree, looks like a Contender in the vid, not a revolver!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from John C. wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I am not sure that he could even legally fire this handgun in Switzerland.I lived in Switzerland while on a temporary assingnment for work, and while shooting ranges are quite common, everyone of them that I saw had restrictions on what types of guns could be fired.Of course, I could be mistaken, as the signs at all the ranges were in German (Swiss German), and/or French.Even if he could legally fire it. I imagine the people who live in the area surrounding his local shooting range would object to the excessive noise.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mick wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I don't think a revolver in this caliber would be a good idea, at least not with more than one chamber loaded. It's not safe to have loaded guns flying around!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from chance wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I dont recall reading where mr petzal says the gun in the video and the new fancy revolver are one and the same. he does say to watch the video to see the .600 in action. If i recall correctly it is a contender that someone built for themselves or something like that. I got it in a fwd fwd fwd email once awhile back. I recall a much larger guy shooting it though.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dickgun wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Clay,I agree with you about the AK 454 Casull shooters. On the other hand, I bought one - a 4" 5/8 bbl field gun with conventional sights, finally, from Wayne at Casull Co.after a lot of conversations with him at Conventions. I do not like to shoot it, but I CAN shoot it. I worked my way up with a .44magS&W a lot of years ago and the same techniques apply only more so. I carry it in a shoulder rig when I am flying in big bear country or otherwise as may be needed. I have never had to use it in anger. But, with the 300 gr max round it is impressive. Sights do not mean much when you need that gun - instinctive shooting takes over (like the old western gunslingers).

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Bella check this outSAE to/from Metric conversionhttp://www.worldwidemetric.com/metcal.htm

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Bella45 Cal 45ACP(.451) is 11.46mmand60 Cal is 15.24mm

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jersey pig wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

when will 1 be available for CCW purposes?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I don't know where the 3 times more powerful than a .500 S&W came from. I'm guessing Ross would say something like "how about 3 times more powerful than a 30-06?"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

if it weighs 13 pounds anyway, and obviously doesn't handle like a Model 19 Smith, why not simply have a double rifle made for the same cartridge? If it's a Krieghoff, it can probably be had for the same 16 thousand dollars.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Has Zeliska ever actually fired his new toy? Just wondering.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Looks like a girlie gun to me. Best to place that first shot prudently as the repeats will be slow in coming.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Back in the 19th century Some Hiungarian guy invented an 11mm revolver (it may have been pinfire), The name is on the tip of my toungue and I just can't come up with it...Anyway the King of Montenegro thought these huge 11mm revolvers were his ticket to national security so he decreed that every Montenegran adult male would carry one of these monsters at all times. I think it might be a fair compitition to this .60 caliber big shot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

David, the blast from that 600 muzzle break would have blown the tin right off the roof!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Tennessee Hunter GuyI must respectfully disagree with you Sir. The #1 bar far backup gun is a Ruger Mark II 22 pistol and a pair of tennis shoes. Shoot your hunting partner in the ankle and run like hell !!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I remember those 454 Casull shooters in Alaska and telling them both state and federal law requires taking the John Deer Plow front sight off that cannon. WHY? When you shoot that Kodiak it’s going to swipe it out of your hands and shove it up your _____!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Dave,I'm not so much for fantasy but I read more than my fair share of science fiction. Have you ever thought of changing your writing career.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cl;ay Cooper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Dave probably a 50 S&W

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Mr. Zeliska has more money than I have sheets of toilet paper.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Tennessee Hunter Guy wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

the ultimate backup gun for africa

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

P.S. Don't forget to take the muzzlebreak off and shoot it once just to see how hard it really kicks...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

No need to wait Dave, Pfeifer has your revolver now! Guiness World Record Revolver. 28mm, 25.4mm to an inch... hmmmmmm.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Looks like a Contender to me... stainless steel and black composite too with the extended trigger guard like T/C's and #1's. Definitely not the revolver McIntyre is holding. Cool video though, did the guy hit himself in the face or not is what my son and I are arguing over.Go to my link it shows the same .600 Nitro T/C and the same guys. Never wrong Dave?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Look how long that thing is! At what point does a handgun become a rifle?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rob wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I'm with CRM - If he'd shot a revolver of .600 NE caliber the least of his worries would have been shooting the light load. Looking for his fingers in the next county would have been what he'd be up to.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

U-Tube video is a ContenderFirst it is definately a break action, second is thedistinctive trigger guard, and third, no shooter of revolvers ever places his off hand foreward of the cylinder like that twice.I wonder if they will ever find anyone to actually shoot the Pfeifer revolver?Makes my puny little .41 and .44 mags look like mouse guns!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dickgun wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I note that the firing range seemed to be empty as he prepares to fire. Wonder why?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

To Nit-Picker: You may be right. It looked like he broke the gun to load it, and as far as I can see, the Pfeifer doesn't break. Anyone else with any intel?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Of course it has a gold plated hammer! For some reason the word "compensating" and the phrase, "hey ya'll watch this..." come to mind.Some where Elmer is sitting under that big old hat calling Bull$&!#on such pieces of hardware. But I bet he does have a bit of a grin on his face...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nit-picker wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Dave,I'm not sure that's the same gun--looked like a Contender action to me.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Geez......

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from George wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

Do we have time to order a set for Obama and Biden?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

So, is that like a slow pushing recoil of a .480 Ruger, or the intense slapping recoil of the .454 Casull? Ah, if it hits you in the head anyway, what does it matter?Looks like a pith helmet or hard hat should be standard equipment with this beast, along with a leather gauntlet and a hired revolver carrier. Maybe add shooting sticks and a counterweight hanging off the barrel. I know! Add a shoulder stock.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scrap5000 wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

OH...MY...FRICKING...GOD

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob wrote 3 years 5 weeks ago

I saw that vid on youtube a while ago. Amazing gun! Just make your first shot count if you are carrying it as protection, because by the time you recover about 5 minutes later...well.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edward J. Palumbo wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

This cannon falls into the general category "If you build it, someone will buy it." There will always be that segment or market that delights in owning the extremes, whether it makes sense or not. Other than filling a niche as an expensive conversation piece, I don't know what role such a handgun would fill. Maybe my tastes are too traditional or classical, but it's not an attractive, practical or intelligent choice for most handgunners, and I infer that Mr. Zeliska has more resources than judgment or experience as a handgun hunter, but I wish him years of shooting satisfaction (or bragging rights) with this oddity.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from pineyhunter wrote 3 years 2 weeks ago

does the word "overkill" come to mind?for what purpose would anyone want to own such a monster?other than the fact that somebody can afford this beast and it would definitely make a reliable and interesting conversation piece.yes i'm sure it will get you that trophy you always wanted or save your life from a charging elephant.but after that save, how is it going to protect you from the next predator who comes around and you just happen to be walking around the african plains still dazed and confused from the first shot with possibly 2 broken arms or dislocated shoulders,etc.?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dbarry wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

Want that kinda pain, with a lot less $$, try one of the smith & wesson 13oz 357's with full power loads - or just hold an M80 with some kevlar gloves! :o)

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs