Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Some Political Notes

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

June 06, 2008

Some Political Notes

By David E. Petzal and Philip Bourjaily

Does anyone remember Martha Mitchell? She was the wife of John Mitchell, who was Attorney General under Richard Nixon and went to prison for his involvement in Watergate. As the coverup started to unravel, Martha would get a few drinks in her and start calling newspapers with all sorts of interesting stuff about who was lying about what, and it got so bad that her husband allegedly had her sedated and kept prisoner in a motel room.
Bill Clinton seems to be rapidly going out of control, and if Hillary becomes the nominee for Vice President,  we may see Secret Service agents tailing him with a hypodermic needle. What worked on Martha Mitchell may also quiet down Bubba. It's worth a try; nothing else has succeeded so far.

****
In 1992, Clinton's opponent for president was George H.W. Bush, who was viewed by a considerable number of gun supporters as too moderate, and they withheld their votes. This contributed to eight years of Clintons in the White House. John McCain has his weak spots as far as the Second Amendment is concerned, but he is infinitely better than Obama.

****
Now that Hillary has morphed into Annie Oakley it might be helpful to see what she thought before she became the Shooter's Best Pal:

"I will work to reinstate the assault weapons ban….I will also work to make sure that police departments get access to federal information that will enable them to track illegal guns…." 4/16/08

"I believe that every new handgun sale or transfer should be registered in a national registry…." 6/2/00

"[after Columbine] Bill and I announced a proposal to raise the legal age of handgun ownership to 21, and limit purchases of handguns to one a month."  11/1/03

****
And from Barack Obama:

"…I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right…" 4/16/08

"I think it is a scandal that this president [Bush] did not authorize a renewal of the assault weapons bill." 10/21/04

Comments (168)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 39 weeks ago

We need another Martha Mitchell right now with this loud mouth Biden guy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill wrote 3 years 41 weeks ago

I just got back from the San Juan Islands and Seattle in Washington state. We're doomed!.... The militant socialists up there are on the rampage with the election so near and all. Someone needs to sit them all down and cool their jets by letting them in on the fact that the "R" party is really on their side on so many of the issues! It's just an election year and so all of the Mcains are out there throwing red meat to all of the sponges in the "R" base. The Mcains will all go back to being the socialist sympathizing gutless wonders they really are after the election! J.M. is a heck of a good guy, its just that if this is what we are going to hold up as White House material this time around, just imagine how low our standards will be next time! This should come as a surprise to no one...The "R" party's love affair with big government has become increasingly worse since Bush took office.Time to join the Constitution party!.....Look into it!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CB Jackson wrote 3 years 46 weeks ago

Womans Day 19 Feb 02 p 26 in “Woman at the Wheel” by Jayne O’Donnell reported “It's a statistic no parent wants to hear: Cars are the leading cause of death from unintentional injury for children under 14”. Using the line or reasoning gun control folks use i.e. an inanimate object injured or killed someone, we then should get rid of those bad cars that are killing our children. People take driving education courses, are licensed to drive and the vehicle is also registered and licensed but still all this “registering” does not prevent injury. Good/proper use behavior using the inanimate object is critical. Bad behavior leads to injury good behavior prevents injury. Hundreds if not thousands of people are effected by car accidents but cars are not the easily attacked item as firearms are. What’s next? Taking away steak knives, baseball bats? I can easily injury/kill someone with a plastic or metal pen if after penetrating the eye, temple (head). Behavior is the key and as we well know “it’s not my fault” attitude is prevalent in our society. Someone or something else is to blame i.e. the no fault, entitlement lifestyle.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

We don;t realy need a President any longer. The Supreme Court has us by the balls and continue to squeze till we cry. Had it not been for them in 2000, we would not be in this mess we are today. To think that a 4-5 decision put GWB in the WH is beyond me. I sure hope who-ever wins this useless election in NOV. has the gall to select long term thinking Justices. Correct em if I am mistaken, but best I recall, NAFTA was begun under the first Bush???? however Clinton did sign the final bill, a bad mistake. But Clinton does not deserve all the blame for NAFTA. I am not the brains of you gys, but to me, if we are to allow other countries to import products to the USA, then those counties should have to export from the USA the same Dollar amount.I have never been so un-certain about the future of the USA as I am now. With the two poor choices we got to choose from, can anyone predict what either will do. Obama only says Change, (Change what and How) McCain says more of the same, we will be in Iraq for l00 yrs. The USA cannot afford to continue to spend 3 million dollars a Day in Iraq. AS for 911 Bush went after the wrong country, he should have called a spcial session of congress and then decided on whom to go after.In my book it would have been Sad/Araba. Belive l5 of those on the planes were from that country. We did what we set out to do I thought and that was to get rid of Hussein and Bin Laden. Well, we did l/2 the job and Afg. is in more turmoil today than on the onset. Bushes MIssion Accompolished banner on the Battle ship was a tad early.Yep, I',m a Dem but not for Obama,or his wife,she is a scary as he is, as she hates the USA.BAck to Tim R. We will all miss his imput thru-out this falls election and then afterwards on Sunday. I am pleased that Tom Brokaw will fill in on Meet the Press on Sunday till after Jan. 20th. This war in Iraq is breaking the USA, how much longer can we spend the amount of $$ and supplies as we are today. As for Oil, I do believe that BOOTLEggERS are buying lots of oil and storing till it gets even higher. I cannot believe we buring that much more oil than we did 2 yrs ago. As smart as the USA is, why cannot we come up with a alternate to gas for our needs. If we got the brains to ship men and equiptment to the Moon, surely somebody can find a replacement for gas. I recall in the 70's the Solar Panels were a hot #, has anyone looked into returning to those to help heat our homes and run our cars. I Live in the Country have lots of timber and have plenty of down wood, so will now begin to heat my home again with wood and a nice cozy fireplace. Sure will be glad when Hunting season begins, so can talk about my favorit subjects, GUNS AND HUNTING. As for Rocky Mtn hunts, at todays cost, I may have made my last trip West and just hunt w-tails and Coyotes here at home. AS my retirement funds continue to earn less each renewal and you sure cannot pay your bills on SS.Being disabled/handicapped, kinda hard to be a greeter at Wally-world. PS' Heard that Ford Motor Co was going to bring back the Fiesta small car. Guess what???? to be built in Mexico. Why not use the plants Ford has here in the US and let the Illegals work for the pay they earned in Mexico, then we all cold buy a litle car and save the gas and maybe our homes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

I still think he was the best on the air today (er, recently).PS., Scooter never impressed me much either. So who do you believe? JMO.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

About as unbiased as a reporter can be... if he's a lifelong Democrat who has worked for Daniel Moynihan D NY, Mario Cuomo D NY, and met his wife at the 1976 Democratic convention. His son now hosts a radio show with James Carville the left wing attack dog. He was also the first to leak the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame according to Scooter Libby, and Russert never denied it... sad to think that this is as close to non-partisan as the Networks hire.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

RMH,I'm glad you said that.If Tim R. interviewed a Dem. you would think he was Rep., if he interv. a Rep. you thought he was Dem. Good man.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

I never missed a Sunday AM ( if was athome)watching Meet the Press. I feel as if Tim was by far the better News Anchor on the air so many years. To me he was down the middle. Cannot recall in him ever taking sides with Rep or Dems. I shall miss him this Sunday and all the Sundays I have left, plus his imput in the fall election. Rest in Peace Tim.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Obama's sock puppet wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

Buy now while supplies are still available.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

WAM:I certainly agree that a "normal" person (you and I) wouldn't spend a lot of time at HP. I don't know why I was there! I just noted the bomb that was thrown, and waited for the MSM coverage. I was stunned by the silence! Obviously, they don't want this out in the public. As I said, the interviewer is somewhat widely known, and respected as a liberal jounalist. That's how he got the interview. BTW, I went back a couple of days after Tim Russert died. I was shocked at the responses posted there. While many were sincere expressions of condolence, many were also slams on his integrity and alleged collusion with the Bush Administration. A few were outright lies and unfounded character assassination. I was very disappointed. I would've thought that human beings would have more class.YooperJackP.S. Can you imagine the sight of Sec. Powell, in stripes and handcuffed, being arraigned? That will do wonders to unify this country!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

YooperI had not heard of Obama's war prosecution statements you mentioned. I think the Huffington Post is as full of manure as Obama is.JMHO

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

Yoop,Oh America needs him, its just a large percentage don't realize how much. BTW, my son pre-enlisted in Marines a week ago.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

Okay, I remember an incident that happened in NYC, on 9/11/01. For some reason, roughly 3,000 Americans died that day. A lot of us in "the sticks" were greatly moved by that horrible incident. We sent our sons and daughters to avenge that attack, and also to insure that it doesn't recur. For the most part, this endeavor has been successful.Now we learn, from one of the candidates, that our retaliation, and steps toward prevention, were wrong. It should've been handled in the courts! About a month ago, I read an article on Huffington Post, an article, where a "journalist" interviewed Barack Obama. In this interview, Barack said that his first priority as POTUS will be to use Department of Justice. to investigate all aspects of the GWB war in SW Asia, and the war on terror. The goal of this investigation will be to prosecute everyone, involved in the decision to go to war, anyone involved in war crimes and anyone involed in illegal acts such as wiretapping. The suspects include, but are not limited to, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, George Tenet and John Ashscoft.For some reason, this interview got no airtime. Rush Limbaugh didn't mention it until last week. No one else said anything at all about it.My son has a decision to make shortly. Should he reenlist, or get out. My thoughts right now are, if the people in urban areas cared about their security, they would voice their opinions, either at ballot boxes, or protests, or even letters to their editors. Any opinions they do have, appear to indicate that the are OK with that large hole in the ground. I told my son to reup for economic reasons, reup because you like the job, but don't reup because America needs you.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

FlipA prime example is the liberal porno-judge in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in CA. The SC, federal, and state judges have been and are legislating from the bench. That needs to stop!But I suppose if one is a left wing liberal, that is just fine. I will vote for the candidate that most closely reflects my values and world view. In 2008, it will not be the son of a Muslim and an atheist, who rails on his family about being racist and fails to salute the flag during the Pledge of Allegiance.I didn't spend 22 years defending this nation and those since financing that defense to pi$$ my vote away on some candidate of "change" who makes no sense with any proposed change. We all can imagine who he would nominate for the Supremes. Maybe Rev Whatshisname?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter:Thank you for an excellent response to Steve S. The reality is that none of us are not going to change the minds of liberal Democrats no matter what we say. You would think the recent SC decision re Gitmo and "enemy combatants" (none of whom were in uniform, BTW) would at least give the libs a hint, but that's not going to happen either. GWB has been a disappointment to most of us, but as you said, he isn't running. Of the two guys who are, neither of whom I'm impressed with, I'm voting for McCain, and the primary reason is his ability to affect the makeup of the Supreme Court. It remains to be seen how this Court comes down on the DC/gun issue. As intuitively obvious as it would seem to most of us, the sad fact is that one SC Judge - Kennedy - will probably throw it one way or the other. It makes no sense to me, but what the hell do I know. I'm just sick and tired of liberal judges all over this great country who seem to feel they have the God-given right to interpret the US Constitution any way they see fit. And no matter what history says about GWB, his SC picks may turn out to be his greatest legacy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Steve S.Here goes:"Why does a city like NYC, which was actually struck by terrorism, vote overwhelmingly Democratic?"Because it is filled with entitlement hungry liberals like every other major city in America."If the people who lived the attacks first hand, are sick of Bush style policies, and want change, why is it that all of the yooperjacks of the world, who are probably far from any real target, feel the need to educate us about policy?"The Yoopers of the world live a sane life ouside of the crime centers and cesspools of our society and have a clarity of perspective, I suppose. It's not all about being a target."I walk by the WTC site everyday, and I sure as heck don't want 4 more years of the same policies..."The WTC 9/11 attack was the second attempt by the Islamic terrorists to destroy a symbol of what they perceive as the satanic nation (us). the 9/11 attack occured less than 9 months after W took office. This plot had been in the making for years. Presumably these plots, along with several other attacks, were hatched during the illustrious years of the Clinton administration. The Democrats have paid little attention to the problem as well.If you are tired of the status quo, you are certainly entitled to express your opinions and vote them. However, don't blame GWB for the Islamic extremist attacks. Check your facts. There have been damn fewer attacks on U.S. interests the past 8 years than the previous 8. Remember the USS Cole, our embassy in Kenya, Khobal Towers in Saudi Arabia, .....If you are a liberal Democrat, then say something substantive about your candidate and how he is going to fix things. Stop blaming Bush as your campaign slogan. He is not running for re-election. If he were, I wouldn't vote for him either. As a Republican, he has disappointed me in many areas, too. Just call a spade a spade.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

From the 2 running for Pres. neithe will do anything to help you and I. Neither can do l2 of what they promish, thats just talk. As someone suggeeted we need the Pres. and V-pres running seperate, as we do in my state for Governor and Let. Gov. THe Dark skinned man can and does talk smooth, says what everone wants to hear, McCain says same thingds as Bush did for 8 yrs, more of the same. If ever a country needed a shot in the arm it's the USA. Not teh same Bull S---- again for 4 more years or longer. Where is Truman----????? we need a few like him now.When you pay 6-7 bucks for gas in a few months, recall what Bush has done in the Middle east to make peace. He's not taking a world vacation at our expense but doing nothing to make peace with the middle east and the USA. This election is by far the worst in my lifetime @73, I've seen a few and some were ok, but this one will break the bank and your back. All due-respect, I do think we should get back to our pleasure, which is hunting and guns????? Any one agree?.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Can someone on this blog, please answer this for me...?Why does a city like NYC, which was actually struck by terrorism, vote overwhelmingly Democratic ?If the people who lived the attacks first hand, are sick of Bush style policies, and want change, why is it that all of the yooperjacks of the world, who are probably far from any real target, feel the need to educate us about policy?I walk by the WTC site everyday, and I sure as heck don't want 4 more years of the same policies...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Well I'm sure they have a website you can search. I tried, but I didn't get any figure near what you supplied. Not to insult you at all, but "I saw it somewhere" doesn't mean much. I would appreciate it if you could get a source.I would also appreciate it if you could explain to me what those 50,000 "AQ" had to gain by fighting there, instead of coming here and fighting. Or fighting military families in Germany. Or bombing the embassy in Canada. Or shooting up a hotel filled with tourists in Mexico. Doesn't it seem like 1, out of 50,000 could get into Mexico legally, and then buy a gun there? They fought in Iraq because they were there, not because that was the "terrorist" battle of their choosing. Or, you could convince me otherwise.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Tim:I saw it on TV a few months ago. Could've been Fox, maybe NBC. Also, the unemployment rate thing was somewhere around the last two or three quarters of the Carter Term.Anyway, this is why we fought! So you and I would have the freedom to do this! We probably wouldn't be doing this in some parts of the world.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Yooper,How do you figure that we have killed 50,000 AQ there? Do you have a source? I looked at some estimates ranging from 84k to 92k, but that was for "civilian" and I don't know if they are including insurgents, or true civilians (if there is such a thing there, it would only be the young children). Anyways, but I don't think that there is any way we have killed 50k men that were in any way affiliated with AQ.I am sure that we have killed way more than 50,000 people there, but that doesn't mean they were AQ. Very few of the guys that my units killed had any type of training; most were just everyday morons out doing bad stuff, either for revenge, because they were threatened, or they just wanted us to leave, but that doesn't make them AQ. It makes them guys that were trying to kill us for a variety of reasons. We did kill a lot of foreigners in Fallujah, but that was the exception rather than the rule. I personally think its a stretch to say that any of them would have come here if they didn't go to Iraq, but thats just me. Wouldn't it make so much more sense for them to come here? Why go there and really have little impact on us in the long term, when they could come here and have a huge impact with one rifle in a shopping mall or day care? They were there, and didn't have the means to come here and do things like that. The only explanation for that is that they didn't have anything to do with AQ.Regarding your comment about no jobs when you graduate, if I have to have a bad job (which would surely be worse than if I had no college or other training) I would at least like to be educated and poor, vs uneducated and poor.I am not a huge fan of Obama, but I do believe that he is by far the lesser of two evils. I do not belive he has the answer for everything, but as I stated earlier, Iraq is my biggest issue for the upcoming election, and he plans to do what I consider the right thing, when Senator McCain (whom I respect quite a bit, but mainly for his past service) will do what I consider the wrong thing. I'd like to see a much more right leaning Dem that would like to get out of Iraq, or a more left leaning Republican that would do the same, but neither of those will happen. Not in this election at least.Oh, those stats are from the Dept of Labor. I might be misinterpreting them, but I don't think so. Maybe the rate was that high in your local area, and not nationally.BTW, you're welcome for my service lol.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedicI can't believe those stats! I remember MUCH HIGHER figures on television!BTW, THANK YOU FOR YOR SERVICE!!As a veteran, you know that the price of freedom is never free! I believe that our troops have killed somewhere around 50,000 al Qaeda since we invaded Iraq. That's 50,000 who would've come here, but chose to go to Iraq, because Americans could be killed there. They would have come here!I know that John McCain voted against the new GI Bill. I'm sorry he did. However, what good is a college education if there are no jobs when you graduate? Obama is just plain arrogant when it comes to the economy. Also, if he's not scripted, he can't think and talk at the sdame time. He can only read well. I honestly believe, if not for Affirmative Action, he'd be the happy man at Walmart!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

YooperJack,I doubt these things will get better by doing the same thing, do you?Do you think that by staying in Iraq, or possibly invading Iran, that we will have less Americans get killed than if we left Iraq? Hell, there were more Saudis involved in 911 than any other nationality, and we continue to be in bed with them. Seems to me that maybe we should continue our war with Afghanistan, and go to war with Saudi. They attacked us, not Iraq. I have spent more than 2 years of my life in Iraq, in two different units, and believe me, most of the time, we are fighting to maintain security there, not making any types of dents in any terrorist organization (which didn't exist before we invaded and spent too much time there.) If we left Iraq, less citizens would be killed. Not more. Maybe then we could send more troops to Afghanistan to fight Al-Qaeda. You know, the guys that attacked us? Obama has said this about Afghanistan "The first step must be getting off the wrong battlefield in Iraq, and taking the fight to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan" http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/the_war_we_need_to_win.phpYeah, he sounds pretty weak on terrorism when he says "As President, I would deploy at least two additional brigades to Afghanistan to re-enforce our counter-terrorism operations and support NATO's efforts against the Taliban. As we step up our commitment, our European friends must do the same, and without the burdensome restrictions that have hampered NATO's efforts." Sounds weak huh? Because he wants to send more troops there, and encourage Europeans to do the same? Ummmmmmmmm.... Yeah, hes weak on terrorism huh?Since you implied that veterans would have to apologize to get jobs (you did say "Viet Nam Vets had to appologize when they applied for jobs. This is what "Osama" Obama is promising us for our future.") maybe we can talk for a second about who would do most for veterans. Obama supports the new GI Bill, McCain does not. Obama supports it as the right thing to do by veterans, McCain does not support it because he thinks it will hurt retention. He cites a study done by the Army that says it will lead to a 16% drop in retention. Sadly, the study also says that it will raise recruitment by 16%. The Army's goals of initial enlistment are normally about 80,000, and the reenlistment goal is normally about 60,000. That means, if the study is accurate, that we will have a larger Army WITH the new GI Bill, vs before it.Also, while I am no fan of Carter (yes, I'm too young to remember anything but very vague things about him, but I can, and do, read books, and talk to my family about their opinions of things past) you said that unemployment was "around 14 per cent". The Bureau of Labor disagrees with you. According to them, for 1977 we had 7.1%, 78 we had 6.1, 79 we had 5.8, 80 we had 7.1, 81 we had 7.6.http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm In the years following, it continued to raise, and that of course is mainly due to him, but Reagan also played a role in those years as well.Anyways, I guess we will see what was the right thing to do in 15 or 20 years. Hindsight is always 20-20, but I think that going after the guys that attacked us, instead of some moron tired of us being in his country will be the right thing to do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

YooperI am with you! B Hussein Obama poses terrible risks to our national security! Eloquent speeches aren't going to keep emboldened Islamic terrorists from further attacks on our own soil!McCain is a nitty gritty guy with a lot of experience, the ability to build coalitions and he'll get things done.Funny thing; the Dems have been less inclined to take pot shots at our 'failing' health care system since Teddy K had his life saved by that same system! Coincidence? I don't think so!SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMHAn interesting, if self contradicting, ramble at me. In the late '30s and early '40s that patron saint of the Democratic party -- FDR (and Queen Eleanor) was residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC; FDR did more to socialize the US than any President before or since. Sure LBJ tried! Klintonista I also tried! But FDR and Eleanor forced their socialist 'reforms' into the landscape.I can not agree that as a country we would have been better with either Gore or Kerry. No GWB is not wonderful but he did LEAD us through several unprecedented disasters including 9/11 and Katrina. I know that not everyone is better off now than when Klintonista's reigned but in large part the movement of manufacturing jobs to Mexico, China and India was well underway by 2000. Klinton pushed for and celebrated NAFTA and other pacts which have encouraged further weakening of US Manufacturing. Hopefully the lower U$D will make it more feasable to manufacture here!SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedic:I didn't read anything you wrote except in this post. I do know that you are grossly mistaken with your idea tha things can't be much worse. BHO is soft on Islamic terrorism. If he's elected, Americans will die! Also, you're probably too young to remember Carter. We had unemployment around 14 per cent. Viet Nam Vets had to appologize when they applied for jobs. This is what "Osama" Obama is promising us for our future. The man is a borderline moron. He will gladly raise unemployment to implement a "fair tax" code. If that means raising the deficit, so be it. Also, apparently, he has no energy policy short of you not driving, eating, or heating your home.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedic,You had another post on a different blog that I combined into one.The matter of awarding or earning a medal was hashed over some time ago. Especially by veterans, read back.Give the man a break, I'm sure dave entertains us with these blogs on his coffee break.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Things to nitpick about? You are right, our huge national debt, our repeated violations of our own constitution, our disgusting environmental policies and our flourishing economy are things that are really unimportant in the big scheme of things. Yes, lets "nitpik" about those.He may not be our answer, but he is something different, and we surely do not need more of the same crap that we have been enduring.I will be sitting with Obama, not another image of Bush. Don't worry about it. If you want more of the same, by all means, go get more of the same.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedic,Well then go sit with BO and think of some more things to nitpik about. What you people think this guy can do with promises of 'change' I don't know. He hasn't shown anything but a penchant for spouting big things and worshipping with a hate monger.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Though I do not like Obama's stance on gun control, it is relatively low on my priority list of what I care about this election.I care much more about Iraq, the economy, and trying to un-copulate what the "honorable" Mr. Bush has done.I believe that Obama is the one that can fix these things, not McCain. Our country cannot (reasonably) get much worse off right now, and McCain wants more of the same. I do not, and I most certainly will not be voting for him.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

For all his virtues as a man, I don't know if McCain would win. Having read David Halberstam's "The Powers That Be" (and other literature on Nixon-Kennedy before that), I'm also aware that TV holds the key to getting elected.McCain looks like an older, kinder version of Billy Bob Thornton. Especially when he smiles. Which is not particularly appealing. Obama will smoke him in a TV debate.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

I saw a news story last night on T.V. about a group of sportsmen in Wyoming who have paired up with the environmentalist movement to stop the drilling for natural gas south of Grand Teton. While the thought of a bunch of drilling at the base of the pristine mountain ranges does bother me, I am even more disturbed that these sportsmen don't seem to understand just who these environmentalists are and what the ultimate result of their goals would be!In their heart of hearts, these wine and cheese socialists see these sportsmen as a bunch of hay seed hicks with "guns" in their pickups! Deep down they cannot bear the thought of these "blood thirsty moronic cowboys" defiling the mountains with their Wal-mart hunting boots. They see us as a bunch of traditional "unwashed" American idiots going about raping and destroying the land and "consuming" it's resources! The way they see it, the land is only fit for "good stewards of the environment" like themselves! If they had their way, only they would be permitted to set foot on many of these public lands armed only with a cork-screw and a cutting board in one hand and a copy of Mine Kampf in the other!My point is, while it may seem in the best interest of both these groups to stand against this drilling right now, it is only a matter of time before the environmentalists turn on the sportsmen and start to insist that, they too, should worship at the shine of big government! They may demand that the sportsmen stop hunting and fishing and may even start to demand that in certain areas, there be restrictions on the number of people allowed in those areas each day! You see, the environmentalists, the anti-hunters, and the anti- gunners are pretty much all the same bunch of Marxists!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Silver Arrow:Yes, we all did make more $$$ from 92-2000 and more jobs available then also. When CD rates were at 8% or more depending on the Amount you invested and what term. Now, CD's on any term are less than 4%, to my figures that 50% less income from your investment. As for Jobs, non left here where I live, all the mfgering plants closed and moved to Mexico or some of-shore island. People I know are now driving from 25 to 200 miles to find work and at less salary than back in the 90's. I care less who is in the WH,as long as he don't get in my bilfold , then it hurts. My life style has changed to the income available to me, and if you really check the numbers on lost jobs and incomes from the working class you will see what I;m saying is true.The well-off have gotten even more well off and us peons have gotten worse off. Bring back the 90's for me and I will hunt more out West and buy more firearms. O, forgot, what was the price of gas in the 90's and today its over 4 bucks and continues to climb. With 2 oil well junkies in the WH, they making the well off happy. Doubt you recall the late 30's and early 40's, when times were realy tough, more people lost their property than those today. I recall my family waspaying for our farm and the yearly payment was 450.00. Several years, we only could pay the interest.Not until the early 50's did things improve and we paid the farm off, by my Dad and Mom working 2nd shift jobs at a sock mill and farming as well. I was a little shaver, but recall the sleepless nights my parents never slept, worring about loosing our home and farm. At l0 yrs old I began working after school and Sat. and Sundays to help out. That was the best education ever offered, as you learned how to make a living.And, I was born in the USA, not some other planet as our population now shows the many transplants we support. Wait till the Ilegal;s begin to draw SS that you paid in, your retirement is going to them, not being invested for your retirement. years.Sadly, no improvements in sight. Get real and check history of the 90's as compared to todays.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

A note from my Dealer; listed below.I've been in business for 40 years, and 40 years ago gun retailers would cry,"Why cain't I get products at the same price as Sears?" Forty years later it's,"Why cain't I get products at the same price as Wal-mart? The unwanted truth is that Wal-Mart has their firearms manager at the plant in CHINA. The product goes from China to the USA Wal-mart warehouse. The warehouse is totally computerized and connected to evry cash register in evry Wal-Mart store in the USA,and the world. Wal-Mart has 24/7 real time iventory control. The computer calculates how fast the product is selling, when and how much it needs to re-order,and sends the order directly to the factory in China with a time frame. A Wal-mart product makes two stops, the last stop beig the counter in a retail store. That's a significant advantage when diesel fuel is $5.00 a gallon, and on it's way to $10.00 a gallon.Some of you guys may recall my stating some time back, that I did not think Wal-mart sold the quality firearms as your local dealer does. I had planned on a new Remington Model 770 , looked at one at Wal-mart and was a piece of junk. Then I went to my Dealer and saw the same gun. No comparison in quality,fitting of metal and wood or Syn, plus the metal at Wal-marts was a thin as Paper. Needless to say I forgot the 770 and had heard of the MArlin XL7. So after reading on the testing of the XL7 by Wayne Van Zool and a couple other writers and testers, I ask my dealer to order one for me, with the understanding if not the quality advertised I would not take, he agreed as he wanted one also. So the XL7 arrived, and I was thrilled. It is a quality built firearm as all MArlin guns have been. It is a combination of a Wincheser 70 and a Rem 700 and the Savage Accu-trigger. Stock , SYN, fits like a glove and love the trigger and how easy to adjust. Plus it's several dollars cheapr than the Rem 770. So guys, I just wanted to let you all know that my thinking that many Wal-mart guns wore a USA name, but Mfgerd in China. Better still, if we don't trade,. buy from our local dealers, Wal-mart will soon run them out of business as it has to the Mom and Pop small stors. I;m willing to allow my dealer to make a few dollars over the Wal-mart price, as if got a problem, he will handle, try that with Wal-mart. Also, this Dealer thinks handguns and home defence shotguns l8"bbls will increase in sales thru 2008 and 2009, as the younger generation feels the 2nd Amd. is going to drown prior to 3-4 Members of the Supreme court retires in next 2-3 yrs. My dealers also stats, those of us who do not reload, better buy up a supply of ammo fast, as the cost is going out of site, as China and JApan buying all the lead they can get. I noticed my Brand and caliber of Ammo has gone up over 30% since last year. Even Wal-mart's ammo is up, if you trust it to be USA made. We as sportsmen, better for our on benefit, buy from our local dealers all we can. I'm, guilty of buying junk I think will help, but in fact, a waste of $$. I will begin shopping at my local dealers and be happy. Shoot-um-straight and often. The old Gunslinger.PS: The above Info came from the American Firearms Industry,that usually is correct 99% of the time.And I trust my 70+ dealer.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Hunter. Canot recall the resturant, but is one block of main street near the Museum. Not fancy, but good food. Called DOW and may have something I can live with, all depends if my Son or a friend can go also. Thanks for the information. I;m going to write a note I received from my Dealer today in the next box, read if you will.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMHThanks. Get on the CO website or call DOW for info. There are over the counter elk tags in the Craig area and even several hundred deer tags available when the leftovers go on sale.Yeah, at a shade over $800, deer and elk tags are steep in CO. $643 in MT ain't cheap either! To budget, I buy the deer in the April draw purchase and elk in August leftover sale. Since we have to make motel deposits and ranch fees early, I buy the cheaper tag early and the other one later. From my experience, I am more likely to tag deer and elk the same week in NW Co than in MT. I can usually only stretch a week and a half to travel/hunt, so the 5 week MT season doesn't help me in that regard. Since I'm not retired yet, I don't have unlimited time off. I usually don't hunt my home state of WA if I go to CO. Seasons too close together.What was the name of the cafe you talked about? The TIn Cup and Bad To The Bone have the best grub in Craig that I have found. The Backwoods Cafe on W. Victory Way has a good breakfast, but their dinners weren't all that great as I recall. I have never had less than an excellent meal at Bad to the Bone (on Breeze Street just a couple of blocks north of Victory Way / U.S. 40). I want to go back to the Old West Steakhouse in Steamboat this year. Mighty fine!Shoot straight!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

The R. party "was" our last hope of saving this great nation. Now there is nothing left but a bunch of socialist sympathizers on their side! Time to join the Constitution party! All of you out there who are going to vote for JM had better think again.............. All you're going to do is continue to justify the move of the R. party to the left even farther! Bush himself has done more damage to the R. party's principles in the last seven years than anyone else and the left still hates him!!!!!!!!! Think about it!!! It will never be enough for the left until this country is totally socialist! And because of spineless leaders like Bush, we are already well over half way there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary in MN wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Some people have indicated that they are voting for Obama so their kids wont have to go to Iraq. True if you vote for Obama don't worry about the kids going to Iraq. The war will come to the U.S. Our young men and women are doing a great job over there. No one wants to go to war but freedom isn;t free.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

DP will probably have a comment about this tomorrow morning, but to those of you who think it's a good idea to elect a liberal Democrat, I would direct you to today's SCOTUS decision re the prisoners at Gitmo. NOW do you understand why one of, if not THE, most important decisions the POTUS makes are the judges he nominates for the SC? I don't know whether to laugh or cry. The absurdity of it boggles my mind.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Hunter: Thanks for the Info, will call DOW in C0 in the Am get some information. If bychance you pass thru Craig, C0 be sure and take a little time and look at the Western Museum they got. It realy is interesting. A little of everthing WESTERN and many firearms. I have been to see it 3 times and if go back will see it again. THere is a old fashion resturn near it that serves great food at reasonable prices. After a few days of beans and franks, its a treat to eat there. Wish was goign with you as love teh NW sections of C0 al the way to the Utah border. We hunter north of Craig on Black Mtn and Maybell in western Co.We also hunted below Steamboat springs and Hayden and Rifle.About 65 miles South of Steamboat is where I killed my first Elk. Good luck, don;t kill all the game, as I will apply again next year if living. Those maybe next year are coming to fast, at 73 not many left. About l0 yrs ago,C0 set aside X# of disable permits, but now they stopped I'm told.I never dreamed i would not draw Colorado or MT. Had been bugging the maps to see what routes I would take from Co to MT. MT's season last for 5 weeks, where in Co about 5-7 days now. The found a way to make lots of$$ by dividing up the season into 4 shorter seasons.. In MT you can hunt for the full 5 weeks every day or till kill your animal, plus fish, bird hunt, etc.Cost of Elk and Deer tags are $643.00 this year. A tad cheapr than C0. O well, if you have a good time and enjoy the hunt that's all that matters, killing a animal is a bonus. Too bad I'm to old( and very poor health) to move, or I would be living out West some place, as always wanted to be a Cowboy, ride horses, round up cattle and hunt all I had time to hunt. Life is un-predectable, just play the cards dealt and hope for the best.So, this year will hunt w-tails( did get 2 nice Bucks last yr.) here for our 5 week season and maybe a few days in SE VA. Shoot-um-straight and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Jim in M0: I just rechecked the name stampd on top of the bbl. It says: The Imperial. No other names anywhere. Yes It was my gransfathers, whom my Mother now(92) acquired when they devided his estate about 20 ys ago. She is very sick now and is giving away some of her stuff, and she gave me her Dad's shotgun. I would like to restore if possible. It has a bolt thru the action with a thumb lever that you tighten up as far as will go, the in the action is a grove for that lever to lay in????? quite Odd , never saw one like it before.I plan to take to my Gunsmith for a look see and get his opinion if I should keep as is or restore. Stock has a chip broken off at the forend and a little crack in the forarm. It really needs a good sanding, buffing and reblueing after the wood work is worked on. It is kinda unusual, as had many SS shotguns, but never one like this one. I love odd ball stuff to begin with, kinda goes with my attitude at times.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from semp wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Ahhh ... Where's Pat Paulson when we need him? Pat Paulson and Professor Irwin Corey ... there's ticket . Washington is so screwed we may as well laugh ourselves into a coma.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Jim in MOI also have the Fjestad Blue Book of Gun Values. It is a fine reference, but not infallible. While most of the information is accurate, it is not complete. For example, it does not show a Savage 110 ever being chambered in .257 Roberts in the synthetic stock and I personally owned one NIB.So RMH's old shotgun could be most anything, particularly if made in small numbers overseas. I have a .410 side by side made in Brazil that is not listed either. It was my late father-in-law's so I have no idea where it came from. It's not too old, but with no serial number, it must be pre-68?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMHMany units in NW Colorado around Craig have leftover deer licenses after the draw. I believe they go on sale August 12th after the second draw for those who applied and did not get one of their first application choices. I'm not sure exactly how that second draw works, as I have always drawn in the first draw. We drew deer licenses this year (results just posted).If you look at the online regs and info, you will see that the deer tags were cut in many areas, including the one we hunt in. They were reduced to about the number of those applied for in previos years. I think the Gunnison Basin was hit particularly hard this winter, but there are other areas not hit so hard. Can't have been too bad in NW CO or the tags would have been cut more.Get online and be ready to look at the Leftover List when they go on sale. That list is updated at least hourly online after they go online. I buy my elk tags that way usually, since I don't fork out the cash for both licenses in April. I usually apply for the deer in the draw, but the elk is available over the counter for the areas we hunt. Also, Idaho and Washington have over the counter deer tags, although Washington is not a good bet for success for an out of stater unless he has the inside scoop on good hunting spots. I could share some good public land hunting info if you decide to hunt in NE Washington. I have not hunted Idaho, but I do pretty well on deer in NE Washington when I hunt there.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMH,Are you sure the shotgun is an Imperial? I tried to look it up in new Fjestad book and so far all I could find is its manufacture date of '92-95 in Surrey,Great Britain. No collector value, just market.But this doesn't make sense , at your age how could your grandpa give you this gun and it be worn?Take a close look at the barrel stampings.Also, this book is almost 2200 pages and I haven't figured it out yet so I'll look some more tomorrow.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

I hope this dialog soon ends and we get back to our favorit subject: Guns and Hunting. That is 2 subjects we all appear to agree on to some extent. We can Bitch and Moan till Nov. and little will it help. The Dye has been cast, and we got 2 choices, litle and none. So best we all begin to let sleeping dogs lie till Nov. Thank godness, Deer season opens prior to then in some areas, and if able I plan to forget politics till Nov. We all learned ( I did) something when we were talking guns.ammo. hunting, etc. Now we all just bull-shitting something we can not change. Tell me a state out West that has Mule Deer tags over the counter, if there are any? Any you guys heard of a shotgun by name of Imperial in 12 ga, single BBL. I was just given my Grandfathers and it needs lots of work if worth anything. Don;t mind spending a little to make it shootable if the value is there.Any help appreciated. You guys looking for a new rifle, best you check out the MArlin XL7 it is a jewel and price is afforable to most any hunter.Shoot-un-straight and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter:Thank you. I couldn't have said it any better. Bush has been a disappoint for me as well, other than his SCOTUS appointments. And as for GW .vs. Gore & Kerry: it was a "no brainer".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve S.I agree with your observation that we should be electing leaders. Obama does not quite fit that bill for me. Don't rail on about Bush. He is not running for reelection. He has disappointed me also. But I certainly don't regret voting for him over Gore and Kerry.I don't want an African-American, an Italian American, an Anglo American, or whatever to lead this country, I WANT AN AMERICAN to lead! Obama is a left-wing elitist manufactured by the DNC (led by wacko Howard Dean) who lacks the experience and fundamental values this country was founded upon.That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Speech Writer wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"Tomorrow you're all going to wake up in a brave new world, a world where the Constitution gets trampled by an army of terrorist clones, created in a stem-cell research lab run by homosexual doctors who sterilize their instruments over burning American flags. Where tax-and-spend Democrats take all your hard-earned money and use it to buy electric cars for National Public Radio, and teach evolution to illegal immigrants. Oh, and everybody's high!"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Speech Writer wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"You know what really gets me? Democrats didn't even win this thing, the Republicans lost it. They ran away from George Bush. "Hey, the ship's in trouble, quick, let's drown the captain!" We were this close to Jesus coming back. And you Republicans that turned your back on the president are going to wander in the desert for the next two years. Literally, someone's going to have to replace those troops in Iraq!"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Speech Writer wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

McCain's concession speech: "The people have spoken - and apparently they're tired of freedom. Don't get me wrong, I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed. I thought this country would last longer than 230 years. That's it, folks, America is over. At this point, we might as well just give it back to the goddamn Indians. Let's see how they'd deal with foreign enemies bent on their destruction. Here's your cake, terrorists!"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph, thanks for under standing my position on names. When I grew up we had seperate schools and the Blacks did also.And they were called the N word. Don;t know or ever cared where Africian American came from. As all the real Africians have long been dead. This new generations of B's were born here in the USA, so get off the kick of Africian American, and call a Spade a Spade. AS to some above. I too worked l00 hrs a week for l8 years, decided that jobs were availabele at 40 hrs a week. So I changed jobs. Had to retire in 90 due to years service age and health problems from the Banking Industry. Invested all my retirement in CD's around 8% in 92 and it made up the difference in SS and and my dividends from my retirement. Now for the past 7 years the rate gone from 8 % to a tad over 3%. Yes I blame W for part of it, as his interest has been only for the wealthy. All his lies about the Iraq war, were just that, LIES. Then in 2004, he scared the religious people into re-electing him as he instilled in their mind that if he was not re-elected the war would be here and not in Iraq. Do agree that Al Gore and Terry were loosers from the onset. The Dem. party could have chosen anyone and bet those two idiots. Now, we gonna be hung with one of the 2 running and it scares me to even think one of them will be pres. I'm too old and not enough knowledge or $$$ to help establish a 3rd party, but this county needs to do so ASAP. But, long time till Nov. anything can /may happen to change whom we vote for.So many Idiots on the loose, a planned elimation could change this Nov.elections. Recall Kennedy and King????+ Lincoln. Hope soon we get back to what this blog is for, sure not on guns and hunting anymore.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Wa Mnthunter,I agree with you more than you know. But, 'you can't fix stupid'.I've erased so many posts to girlieman an Steve somebody manlyier than me save me in times of trouble, because I lose control, and start to say things to these guys who have hands softer than they should be, that I shouldn't.What happened to the gene pool?P.S.Can't imagine BO's military chief of staff would be, Ellan De.?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve, I haven't seen many leaders on the ballot lately... seems like big money rules and the country suffers accordingly.If you think Obama is a leader explain to me where we are being led. I can assure you it will not be the direction I would like to see this country go.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter-I just find it funny how easily people are distracted by what really matters. Does how someone salutes during the pledge really matter when New Orleans is hit with another Hurricane?I'm guessing W has really nice form when he salutes, but look how well he handled that fiasco.We need to stop electing politicians, and start electing LEADERS....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve S.I suppose the rantings of his spiritual mentor were taken out of context, too? I think not.Let me put it this way: If a person goes to a church and doesn't heartily agree with what comes out of the pulpit, how long does he remain in attendance? Not long. Having years of experience in that subject, I contend that folks change churches, split churches, quit going, change religions, or something other than stick around for status quo if they don't LIKE what they hear. Much less be married by some dude you don't agree with and let him baptise your kids? Gimme a break.I agree. FOX is just as guilty as the rest of the drive-by media in using sound bites to play any story to their satisfaction.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I haven't read the books. I didn't say that I had. Thats why I asked to see them in full context.I'm simply saying that to take a sentence here, and a sentence there, it's pretty easy to make something work to your advantage.Just watch FOX news for 10 minutes and you'll see what I'm talking about.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

GmanMerriam-Webster defines: scoundrel - a disreputable personYour response might be applicable to some scoundrels, but rest assured that if one is not patriotic to this great nation who has provided great measures of liberty through the sacrifice of many, he is indeed a scoundrel in my book.A person is as disreputable as the scoundrels he hangs out with. Ask your Mama about that!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Because patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve S:Have you read the books?If so, enlighten us.If not, say so.Obama is not the nominee of half the registered voters. He is not quite the possessor of half the Democrat party primary popular votes, so I fail to see how that is half of anything.As far as fear goes, it will take more than a pip squeak like Obama to bring down this country. I personally would like to avoid the mess to clean up later.Gman, maybe you smoked a little too much in your younger days. It dulls the senses and motivation....permanently.I don't mind if Obama doesn't wear the flag on his lapel. I don't, myself. But I have not seen a satisfactory explanation as to why he fails to properly salute (as a civilian) the flag during the national anthem. So perhaps one of you Obama supporters could explain why it is ok to have an un-patriotic ingrate for President.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter-Those quotes are all cherry picked just to prove your point. Lets see them in the full context of the paragraph / chapter.Taken out of context, its pretty easy to rip apart anyone.Its just blatant fear mongering....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

What makes so many of you so scared like old women?Can you not face the problems of contemporary society without turning the presidential nominee of half the enrolled voters in this nation into a Brooks Brothers-dressed jihadi?I gave up marijuana 20 years ago, but would like to know what you guys are on, because it seems to provide a great escape.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

In Obama's own words (Very, very Scary)This guy wants to be our President and control our government.Pay close attention to the last comment!! Below are a few lines from Obama's books. These are passages in his own words:From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'From Dreams of My Father: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on , to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my fathe r's image,the black man, son of Africa, that I had packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'And here's the clincher: (grab on to something when you read this:)From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'_____________________________________Is anyone paying attention out there??????? Does that mean if elected President he would hand us over to the Muslims????????And it's in PRINT AND IN HIS OWN WORDS!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

RMHI hear you, man. you make excellent points. I don't necessarily agree with everything you said about the economics of the past 10 years, but if you have been impacted negatively your perspective is real.I felt the same way the last several Presidential elections. John Kerry or Al Gore or Bush? Clinton or Dole? Obama or McCain?What choices! To me, Obama is clearly the most radical, liberal, Marxist candidate to sh!t between shoe leather. Apparently there are enough idiots in this country who are charmed by his B.S. to get him nominated. I think your restraint in not using the N word is admirable.Dr Ralph:Everytime I hear that SOB Wright utter his damnation upon America, I hope someone ignites about 59 grains of IMR 4350 and sends him a little something. The only person I have more disdain for is the murderous Osama bin Laden!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Thomas wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

DR. Ralph,Growing up in a largely U.A.W. City and State one would think that I would follow in my father's footsteps and Vote Democratic. But that is not the case. I learned from a early age to listen to what people are saying and not just listen for what I want to hear. I think I have voted mixed ballots more times then not when it comes to the General Elections.There are both Republicans and Democrats that I have liked in all the races. I simply vote for who I feel will do the better job.If you really want to make waves suggest that the President and Vice President should be separate elections and not a team vote. What I mean is instead of every one running for president at the same time have some one running for the VP position too. When Duncan Hunter, and Ruddy, and Romney dropped out they should have reentered to run for VP.I would love to see the look at Horror on Hillary's face when she would have to run against Gore, Edwards, and the other Democrats which have already had a head start. But then again she would have been camplaining for all these months. Come to think about it you really don't get to hear much about what the VP does behind the scenes.Tom the Troll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Thomas wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

The Way I see it, if GMan wants to work a 20 hour week he is entitled to do so. His success or failure depends on him alone. Not the Federal Gov and certainly not the State or Local Gov. As far as I know he could be a brain surgeon and charge $10,000 per hour to operate. I don't know, and I really do not care how he supports him self. Actually I do care. I do not want to see him homeless and out on the street begging for food and money. But I suspect that is not the case and that GMan has his financial situation well under control. Hell I would love to work a 20 hour week my self. But I know that I can't do that because I have obligations to my family to provide for them.Tom the Troll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

RMH, you didn't change views, your political party did. Unfortunately, I can say the same thing about mine. The real question is how do we break the system and actually convince people to get interested enough to not vote for who their parents did? The media has beat it into our brains that a third party candidate is not viable. I voted for Ron Paul a few months ago and Ross Perot a few years ago. The great unwashed masses are becoming the great brainwashed masses... punch my name to listen to the man who performed Obama's marriage ceremony curse America, if you can stand the pain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I made more $$ and did more hunting, buying guns(which this Blog is suppose to be about) during the 92-2000 period. My retirement fund was earning 8%. Under Little Britches Bushie it is now earning 3.85% I don;t know where you worked, but most of the lost jobs occured in the past 7 yrs. Being disabled, I am unable to work a second job at Arbby's or Wendy's or Wal-mart as a GREETER. Regardless of what takes place in NOV. we will never get out of this hole Bush left us in. And yes, I said "Coon" Huh, could have used the N word but thats against the law. But it's ok to be called "WHITTE". Neither party choose the qualified person to be on the Ticket. in Nov. so we hung with 2 guys that know nothing of business and working class people. Now to all you who blasted me a few weeks ago when I mentioned Politics, why are you now so interested in what I tried to state. Best we get back to GUNS?HUNTIN, we begging to sound like Chris MAtthews. If you want to blame anyone,blame those of you who voted for the 2 in psition to take over the WH Come Jan.20.Most chose the wrong person in both parties. Better yet, with the popular vote and the delegates( who in the H--- is the Super Delegates?) not counting, just let the Supreme Court elect the next pres as they did in 2000. Hopefully the next VP with have guts to lead this country, as for sure the 2 running for Prs. have no guts period. Enough about MCCain/Obama, both loosers. Best we forget them now and later. A long time till Nov. anything can happen.Remember the Dewey/Truman election? if not read up on it, The New York Times ate a lot of paper the folling day. Rather than us BITCH, should start a 3rd party. Good hunting,if can afford the gas and related expenses. Will see many Western Hunters hunt their home state or at least one near by.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

GoldenArrow,Nobodys gonna confiscate your car. Pay attention to recent history lessons of the world.The lib. dems. have been spouting that jargon for years.I hear Ted K's out of the hospital, is that you?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Yooper Jack,You are so right about the media defending BO. When he spoke of 58 states, one outlet immediately pointed out that there are 58 Muslim states (or countries) so that was where his mind must have been.That sounds like the worst excuse of all!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alamo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Well GA you can't be that stupid.Show me where the Constitution recognizes your right to drive a car and the part of the Second Amendment that refers to "sporting guns" and you may have a point.Does your post pass for logic where you comes from?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Well GA you can't be that stupid.Show me where the Constitution recognizes your right to drive a car and the part of the Second Amendment that refers to "sporting guns" and you may have a point.Does your post pass for logic where you comes from?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Reeder wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Yooper Jack,Don't get me wrong. For the record, I can't stand Hillary Clinton and under almost any circumstance would never want to see her in office. Circumstances this year gave me pause, not because of any misconceptions about who she is and what she stands for but simply because I believe she would have been a safer alternative to Obama on national security, and because I feared the long-term damage caused by a McCain Presidency would be worse, given the influence he would have over the GOP in its role as the loyal opposition. I will admit part of my antipathy to McCain is personal -- having met him and dealt with him on a couple of occasions, and knowing others who have done so more often, I know him to be a royal jerk, which has nothing to do with left or right. I could easily overlook my personal feelings, though, if it weren't for his positions on a whole range of issues, particularly over the last eight years, which make him in many instances indistinguishable from Hillary about half the time. Given a choice between McCain and Obama, however, there is no choice; not when you consider Obama's radical associations, overtly socialist economics (what can you say about a guy who admits raising capital gains taxes would REDUCE gvt. revenue but wants to do it anyway?)and dangerously naive and pacifistic foreign policy proposals.As for Gman, it seems to me that someone who's been able to cut his work week in half while doubling his salary has done pretty well under W. I congratulate you on your success, which I wish I could duplicate. Unlike some people, though, I don't think you owe me a share of your income out of "fairness," and I have no desire to hold you up to scorn because you had the audacity to succeed.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from GoldenArrow wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I have never seen so many bitter people clinging to their guns. Nobody is going to be taxed 85%! Nobody is after sporting guns. Remember you have to be registered to own a car, why not to own a gun? I am a member of the NRA too!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

RMH says most of us made more money between 1992 and 2000 than since?? What planet was he on!? The slick willy regime's continuous attack on the pharmaceutical industry for whom I worked ended up costing me my job (along with countless other people) and with it went my adequate salary; I was left to find something which wasn't paying adequately. Only in the last couple of years have I regained the earnings I had. Probably never be able to catch my retirement savings up to where it should be!I may not be the brightest light to shine on the ole Christmas tree but I am smart enough to know where my bread is going to be buttered! I am voting for McCain!SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder:We have a SCOTUS decision coming up very soon in the Heller case. I'm fairly confident that this ruling will be favorable. Had Hillary appointed the last two SCOTUS Justices, I wouldn't be so confident. I think you feel sorry for her because she cried!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alamo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I hadn't seen the offending comment. Agreed- Not appropriate, and totally unnecessary. This can and should be a simple debate between wildly divergent visions of what this country is all about.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Black Rifle Addict wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

HRC, or Obama, are two terrible choices for president, but all the candidates are running a campaign based on health care, stop the Irag war, and stop the "business as usual" in Washington DC. Let's see how long it takes for any of them to get these issues taken care of first before taking on the gun rights fight!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I could give a rat's a$$ about the drivel BHO spews. I'm not voting for anybody named Hussein, Mohammed, or Adbul. Period!To the imbecile using Col T. Whelen as a tag: Get creative or put your own handle on here. Thata is about like using Mick Jagger or Richard Nixon. Get a grip.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman:I probably would've been offended also, had he been talking about any other black person. This one, however, is running on that issue, and that issue, alone. He was asked "do you intend to campaign in every state"? His response "I've been in 57 of them and have got one more to go". No one in MSM picked up on it!I guess my point is that this man is, at best, a mental midget, at worst, a moron.It kind of reminds me of a story, a long time ago, where a tailor wovea magic suit for the emperor. It was invisible to people who were unwise. It took a little boy to point out that the emperor had no clothes.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Hey, Alamo!Good to hear from you. I wasn't bragging about my 20-hour work week. I was mentioning that I, as a small business owner (the type of person for whom the GOP putatively offers representation, but doesn't), am able to set a fee schedule reflecting my expertise and experience that allows us to pay our bills and raise our son without resorting to daycare; family values are very important even to pinkos like me. At the present time, that is what fits my family's scheduling needs. I would think that the rugged individualists on this board would applaud a fellow sportsman who is able to strike his own course without relying on others to supply him with a stream of tasks.As for healthcare, I thought we had agreed to disagree on this. Yes, I believe that a civilized society should offer basic services to its citizens. And at this point, the current US system is hurting American businesses more than I can explain in a short time, because our global competitors offer state-paid insurance. Believe me or not.All I'm trying to do here is inculcate a sense of principled debate instead of outright racism and demonization of those whose theories of government don't fit in with the prevailing sentiment in Dave's little corner store. Am I just stirring things up? Maybe, but I just can't let a guy call somebody a coon and not call him on it. So call me a bad American and take away my Gadsden flag.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alamo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I love it Gman!Boast about your twenty hour work week at the same time you've advocated governemnt subsidized (or provided) health care. Nice.Other than accurate observations that Obama is an empty suit with dangerous ideas completely antithetical to the principles that made this country what it is, I don't see that He is generating much "thinking". In fact it is comical how the majority of Obama's supporters are NOT relying on cognition to explain their devotion.Vapid concepts like hope and change instead of intellectual examination of policy proposals are driving this candidacy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

When I said I worked a 20-hr week, I forgot to mention I don't have an employer to exploit. I'm a one-man shop, an entrepreneur, a small business owner.As such, I keep close watch on the policies that affect me such as healthcare policy, the gyrations in the financial markets that lead to a weaker dollar and higher oil prices, and the mess that is property tax and public school funding.I'm not doctrinaire one way or the other. But the GOP hasn't offered anything of substance to me to bring things back into balance. Just my opinion. I do laud what Treasury and the Fed did in the Bears Stearns collapse, but that was the exact opposite of the free market sermon I've heard from the GOP and its followers since Jan '81.If Sen Obama can get more people thinking, for good or ill, that is far better than an administration that has built a culture of fear to govern; the vast majority of posts on this board exemplify how successful that strategy has been.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Does anybody think experience counts for anything? Here we have a guy who hasn't finished his second term in office, running for pres and he's seriously considering Claire McCaskill D Mo., who hasn't finished her first term in office for VP.Hell you may as well just write in some fruit cake from hollywood for pres. Maybe Tom Cruise and Whoopy Goldberg. They talk like they know it all too. Motto: Never been there never done that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Col. T. Whelen:At no time during the writing of the U.S. Constitution, did the Founding Fathers address the rights of Islamic Terrorists, who would destroy America and her people.I'm glad that you care for the rights of these "oppressed" people. I just wish that you cared as much for the nearly 3,000 who died on 9/11/01.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Reeder wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman,My apologies. I forgot that most Democrats don't really have a big problem with being identified as socialists anymore, which is fine with me, since I'm always in favor of truth in advertising. I like the idea of a 20-hour work week and a minimum guaranteed salary, too, but why stop there? Why not make it a one-hour work week? I also think I'll take a million bucks minimum. Why not? It's not like people really earn their money through hard work, inventiveness or the production of useful products and services. As we all know, the guy who gets ahead only does it by exploiting those less willing or able to work hard, and there's no way a free market can possibly allocate resources as efficiently or fairly as bureaucrats and Harvard-educated politicians.As for the chaff produced by the RNC, I can tell you that we were subject to legal fact checkers who did not let a word leave our press shop if it were not 100-percent, verifiably true, which put us at something of a disadvantage against the Clinton administration, some of whose members openly gloated to the Washington press corp that they had studied and borrowed from Hitler's big-lie propaganda techniques -- and no, I'm not making that one up either. They were actually proud of themselves. I can also say that I never worked in a press room in a regular media setting which went to as much trouble to verify its facts as we did in the communications dept. of the RNC. Certainly, I think our information was more trustworthy than say, Chris Mathews at MSNBC, who admits to feeling a "tingle up his leg" every time Obama speaks. Anyone who wants to know the facts about Obama better look them up themselves, because the mainstream media is head over heels in love and is going to do nothing but lay down rose petals for the annointed one from this moment on.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder:I guess I'm a real oddball! I've supported Sen. McCain from the start. I've also felt that he was most able to fight the war on terror. Also, I like his position on 2A and abortion. He's the first candidate that I've supported monetarily.Gman:I can't help but thinking, that people living near NYC, aren't concerned about the possibility of another attack. When the subject of anti-terror arises, the first and most important cite is, the loss of civil liberties and spying. What evidence is there, that the gov't is spying on you and I? I expect any calls I make to the Middle East will be monitored, and as such, I'll try to refrain from talking to Islamic Terrorists.Mr.BSorry for the late response. I've been sans internet for the weekend. I'd rather go without tobacco! GWB ran for President with a decent (I guess) record as two-term Governor of Texas. His record couldn't be attacked because it wasn't. BHO is running for President. His record is, at best, meager! He has voted "Present" 130 times. 130 times, he couldn't take a stand! He's told me I won't have gas for my truck! He's said I won't be able to heat my home! He's told me I might go hungry! He thinks the War on Terror is phony! If you're confident with that, go ahead and vote for him. Keep this in mind; The only thing going for him is the color of his skin. With their intelligence, without Affirmative Action, he would probably be the happy man at WallyWorld, and Michelle would be the cleaning lady at Holiday Inn.RMH:I'll excuse your Freudian Slip! I might have thought something similar! Actually, I've done much better under GWB than WJC. Even with the gas prices, its easier to buy gas than to try to find work when its not there!Please keep in mind, a vote for Barack Hussein Obama is a vote for more American soldiers AND civilans to die!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Laos_07 wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

So let me get this straight. Our gun loving Repubs wanted to pass a law allowing the government the right to confiscated guns in the event of an emergency such as hurricane Katrina and Obama voted against it.To tell the truth I'm not so much worried about someone asking me to register a firearm with my local police chief. Who by the way is a great guy. But when the stuff hits the fan it's my 12 gage I want close at hand, not confiscated by some government."'The gun vote matters,' says Ray Schoenke, founding president of the American Hunters and Shooters Association. And in Pennsylvania, he says, gun owners who follow key Washington legislation aimed at limiting ownership are moving in Obama's direction because of his support of past legislation to prohibit the use of federal money to confiscate weapons during a disaster like Hurricane Katrina. It's the only major difference on gun positions between Obama and Clinton, according to gun advocates, but it's enough for groups like Schoenke's to give the Illinois senator a passing grade."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from VATXHUNTER wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Ding Dong the Witch is dead witch old witch the Biliary Witch

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Call it what-ever you like, but a Spade is a Spade. Color does have it's effect on our lives. Wait till after JAn.20 and you will find out for yourself. I can;t understand either party this round, neither voted for the guys who could have made a difference in our lives. Now you can bet your last $ that you will look back and as WHY. Like him or hate him, but most of us made more $$$$ from 92-2000 than any other time in our lives. What we gained in those years has been lost in the past 7+ yrs. The mexicans are growing like rabbits, and already passed the blacks in the US. Soon the white race will be lost to the two above. Blame ourselves. When did Super Delegats get priority over plain old state Delagets? No point in a popular vote anymore, just let the heads of state choose whom-ever. Or the Supreme will overide them. Like is a mixture now, and afraid no improvements in store for most of us. I pray my Grandkids can cope with the mess.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

My political views have nothing to do with what I have or have not done in the past. Maybe my views have changed because of what I took part in. Maybe not.I'd love a shorter work week, but I don't think my employer should take the hit for it. So who should? The tax payers? That seems to be the lib. dems. answer. Of course, the hard working blue/white collar man will be the one's to pay for it.And the rest will keep their hand outstretched for us to fill.That nonsense must stop.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder, my point is that it is not a crime to be avowedly socialist. I have no trouble with the resolution of the dialectic.I, too, was born in the 50s, and spent 10 years at dailies before chucking it for some fairly complex policy journalism. All straight journo; I don't have it in me to turn spin doctor. So don't lecture me about fact-checking if you spent any time releasing chaff from the RNC.I'm all for a shorter work week. I work 20 hrs a week and make 2X what I did working 50-60 for the rags. What's wrong with that?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from PbHead wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

A few observations:If you do not like the current candidates, I hope you at least gave $200 to one you did like.I remember when "BO" was a bad thing.Come November, those leftover campaign signs make dandy targets. Volunteer to pick them up.Let's start Monday off by sending a few rounds downrange. Have a good week end.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Thomas wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder,Hillary is not done camplaining yet. She still have a $20,000,000.00 debt to pay off. Apparently camplaining is more expensive then she thought and is too dumb to bail out of a sinking ship when it is still afloat. She says that she is now supporting BHO but I don't belive it. I think she will find some way to publicly embarrass BHO and will steal the nomination from him. I think she still has a few tricks up her sleeves that have not see the light of day yet. She probably figured that she could not get enough delegates to win outright so she will try to bump him off and out of the ticket.But that is just my personal opinion and I have no facts to back them up.Tom the Toll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Well it had to happen. The first black presidential candidate that actually can win and only 143 years after Lincoln's "better angels" put a bullet in the back of his head... as a Yankee living in the south I have much experience with predjudice, all of it bad. Fortunately all I had to do was talk slower and less grammatically correct to fit in.The problem with Obama as I see it is not his color but his character. He is rated 100% by the NARAL or pro-death errrr... I mean pro-choice lobby and 0% by the NRLC or pro-life lobby. He is a strong supporter of affirmative action which in and of itself is racist. Syrian realator Antoin Rezko is under federal indictment for favor trading and fraud and was one of Obama's first supporters and has given him over a million dollars. Factcheck.org rates him the most liberal man in the Senate. We don't even need to discuss his preacher who he just figured out was a nut case after twenty years. You won't hear any of this on the big three networks. Why? The Leftist Machine needs to lie and dumb down America to keep in power. That and all the money we earn to give away to those who refuse to work but love to vote for Dumbocrats...By the way, about the only element more fringe than gun nuts are left wing gun nuts.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

So much for the better angels of our nature. Abject apologies, Mr. Lincoln.Between Mr. Reeder's amusing retreat to 50's-style propagandizing (I love the phrase "avowed socialists") to Rocky Mtn Hunter's essay that would have made pre-63 George Wallace tear up with pride, I can't say that I've ever seen such out-and-out horse poop in a public forum that wasn't sponsored by fringe elements.I thought the US was the great experiment, the free market place of ideas; at least, that's what Chuck Colson told me. And Chuck should know. If avowed socialists get the majority of people to agree with them on an issue and it passes the ballot, so be it.But adopting such an attitude would empty the coffers of the Right's Machine, which needs fear in large amounts to survive. Make out that check today, gentlemen! The Negroes and Commies are at the gate! They want your guns and your daughters! Remember the Alamo! Remember the Maine! Remember Pearl Harbor!Been there. Seen it. It's all horsepoop.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Ok guys click and read this by Thomas Sowell. A black man that is not voting for Obama. Has anyone looked into the possibility of cloning Ronald Reagan?http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/tsowell/2008/ts_06051.shtml

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

He said it, but others of you were thinking it! (or worse)Now weren't you?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

He said it, but others of you were thinking it! (or worse)Now weren't you?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Col. T. Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

James T., I just had a .416 Hoffman built for a trip to Tanzania next year, yeah you're probably right, I don't know much about guns. Do you know what Writ of Habeus Corpus means? Look it up, and look up suspension of same my friend.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Huh? wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Rocky Mtn Hunter, did you call Obama a "coon"?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Townsend Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Silvertip, your government is the biggest bureaucracy the world has ever known. Watch the Frontline special, read "Cobra II", "Fiasco", or "Hubris". The terrorist boogie man will end your 2nd amendment rights quicker than you can blink.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Silvertip:It was Thomas Jefferson who said, "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have." -- including all of your rights - the first step is to take away your right to own a firearm.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I thought this was a gun, hunting Blog. Some weeks back I mentioned Politics as was raked over the coals by many on this BLOG. What hapened to change your minds.Same people voicing their complaints now. As for Clinton, I will take her any day over Obama. Yes, he's a smooth Coon, not as smooth as he will be come Nov. HIs wife is a pure breed A.American. Were all the A. Americans born in the US from day one? NO. they were shipped here by the tribal chiefs in Africa who wanted to trade the misfits for Europene mdse. AS for Obama's wife, she hates the USA. The way Obama got in all the better Colleges was due to his color and colleges must have X# of Blacks to get Federal funds.He makes a good speech, because he says what people want to hear. He does not have the knowledge to be President of anything, other than maybe way down on the totum pole in Chicago. Say what you want about Hillary,she would be far better in the WH than the choices we got. Recall the past 7+ ys to the prevous 8 yrs, then ask your self, am I better off now than in l992? Only one answer a big NO I'm worse off, at least I am. All Politicians are about the same,say, do anything to get elected, as most are rich and the only thing left is POWER. Don;t worry about Hillary get the VP, as he will pick the Gov. of Alabama, whom he can control. He cannot control Hillary . I blame the Demo party for Obama getting the nod. The age groupe from l8 to 39 has been spoiled to death by their hard working parents or some social program and work and play with the blacks daily. So you better get use to saying Yessur Boss, whatever you say I will do what you tell me. Sue, Hillary will run in 2012, I hope to be here to see that, at 73,doubtful. McCain, blame the Reps for that, Huckabee should ahve gotten the job, not McCain.I appreciate the hardships McCAin went thru, but he is not Pres. material. Bush has left the USA in a Pile of S--- and I pity whom ever takes his place. You got 3 choices come Nov. McCain, Obama, or don;t vote, I will take the latter other than our local crap we got running. What has become of out Statesmen,whom we at one time look up to and respected.As for guns, I don;t think we got to worry about them, as too many other problems to occupy the elected Officials minds.I don;t understand why so many White Women voted for Obama. He did the same as John Edwards, E. Dole ( has she died) and Va.Fox and Burr did , courted N.C. got to Washington and begun running for Pres immediately. At one time I, l/2 way respected the Kennedys based on Pres.Kennedy,but after Ted and Carolina endorsed Obama, that respect went out the window. We best begin to look for a person to run for both parties in 2012, and start now and prepare that person for the WH. OK, enough about this royal mess, lets all get back to hunting and guns. At least we all know a Remington from a Winchester,Hopefully, and which end of the gun the bullet comes out of. Other than actual hunting with my guns, I enjoy reading hunting trips of other hunters. Just hope prices drop or at east stableize, especially gasoline and plane fares, so I can make another trip to the Rockies.I yet want a nice Mulie and a bigger Elk if one steps out. I always buy tags for both, just in case one of the other does step out for a good shot.Read lst night in a NAtional hunting Magazine,that we better find out wher our last Winchester ( model 70 and 94) werer made.If made in NH, better trade fast s they sorry piece of junk, as teh empolyees used ind=ferior material to clean house, as they knew the plant was clsing. Try to find out from the S# where your latest Winchester was Mfgered. The Blue Book of Gun Values may help.Ok, time to move out. Shoot straight and often. Forget what we can;t change,such as will take place in Nov.The old Gunslinger, who remembers the end of the deprssion years and the WW11 and now the last 7 yrs.Bring on the Horse and Buggy again, as gas continues to rise beyond reason. Maybe we all need to plant corn and make Ethonal or corn whiskey to buy gas.O, that sweet taste of Mash grain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Reeder wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I hate to admit it, but if Hillary had gotten the nomination I might have actually voted for her instead of McCain. That's from someone who spent every waking hour over a five year period at the RNC fighting the Clintons and almost everything they stand for. I flatly can't stand McCain, and my biggest concern about him becoming President is that he will defang the GOP as the only, occasionally useful vehicle for fending off collectivism and appeasement. Hillary on the other hand, while well left of center, is, like her husband, more of an opportunist than any committed ideologue, and would probably be a little safer on national security issues if for no other reason than inviting an attack or leaving chaos in Iraq would hurt her poll numbers. That's now moot, and despite my loathing for him in general, I will choke and gag and vote McCain, because Obama is not merely the most liberal member of the senate by voting record, but from everything I can tell about him a dangerous radical who can't seem to come up with a single friend or acquaintance who is not either a raving, leftwing lunatic or an actual terrorist. I don't know what else you can say about a candidate who works hand-in-glove with avowed socialists in Chicago to get elected to the state senate (you can check out archived stories on the DSA {socialist} website on that one), sups tea with terrorists like William Ayers and Bernadette Dohn, counts among his personal friends a mouthpiece for the PLO, and has won the endorsement of both Hamas and Fidel Castro. That's good enough for me. Throw in legislation he promoted in Illinois that would have shut down every single legal gunstore in the state and I'd vote for McCain if he were the devil incarnate -- and I'm not entirely convinced he's not.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Chuck wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Anyone who has listened to what B. HUSSEIN Obama really says cannot vote for him for intellectual reasons, but just cuz he makes you FEEL GOOD.He is for complete removal of your guns. He has said on many occasions he believes in the second amendment, for those that the GOVERNMENT approves to have guns. Guess what folks, that ain't us.Just look at his long time friends, Ayer, Wright, & Rezko, who BTW he now decides after 20 plus years of friendship they are not the people he knew and cared for.William Ayers admitted he built bombs for domestic terrorism, Do a search. B Hussein was following his lead when he got into politics. They were tight. Ayers is nothing but an urban terrorist who stated in his book, they didn't do enough with the bombings they did pull off.Then there was Tony Rezko. B Hussein "didn't know him that well" (When jack Abramoff was indicted the media tried to portray any Republican who ever talked to him as corrupt but they don't say a word about Rezko after B Hussein's one denial)And lest we forget Rev Jeremiah Wright that BHO could not separate himself from anymore than his grandmother. At least that was his story until he threw them both under the bus. BHO Quotes him in his book. If you read it it has no substance of what we wnt for America.The media kinda forgot these things. BHO is the media's Messiah. If he doesn't wanna talk about they roll over and accept it. They wouldn't do that if he was a republican.The only message BHO has is change. He will bring change all right. He has all the makings of being the last elected American president.What will he do when Imadamnnutjob from the theocratic people's republic of Hell, I mean Iran, begins to do what he(Nut Job) has promised to do. He( Nut Job) wants to wipe all of our infidel butts off the map, The US and Israel both. BHO does not have the stones to stand up to FOX, how is he going to to say NO to a crazy tyrant, Talk with him? Worked real well for Neville Chamberlain.No, if you want to vote for BHO, go ahead, just be aware America will never be the same againI'm not voting for McCain, I'm voting against Obama.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Eyeball, your right a third party canidate will throw a hamper into things, but its so needed. Are we the people so incompetent that its to mind boggling to have more than TWO parties, hell the elections in Iraq, the Iraqi people were able to vote for any of 100 parties. People vote because they want to be on the winning side. Obabma will win, I don't see anything happening differently, he's overwhemingly more popular (for NO reason at all) and a much better speaker, he's young, good lookin politician, the Dumb Masses (say that really fast) LOVE HIM for no other reason than he is a magnificent BS'er, the masses love rolling around in BS as much as pigs do! McCain gonna shoot himself in the foot, because the straight talk comes out kinda curvy some times, and people are goin to notice when he doesn't know the differnce between a Sunni and a Shitte and which group backs us and which is attacking. For those who are worried about the war on terror being lost, BHO said that he would not take a preemptive Nuclear Attack off the table when it comes to Iran, a country with a couple of bayliners afor a navy and NO standing army!!! The war in Iraq won't end on Obamas watch because he doesn't want the choas that will happen to be under his watch. The 2nd Amendment won't be ignored because of the Supreme Court rulings on the DC gun ban. So really there won't be any differnce between McCAin and Obama is what they might veto but if the Dems rule the Legislature than all Vetos can be over ridden with enough support, the Republicrats are between a rock and a hard place, because they left the Republican party behind, which is where most of us are still hanging out, wondering, what happened to the Republic?!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Laos - 65 wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I'm voting for the guy who has the stones to tell Israel to fight its own wars. After giving them 15 billion a year for decades, nuculer tech, the very best and latest planes, tanks and other arms, huge tax right-offs @ The World Bank and finally a truck load of neo-cons maskerading as American Patriots ----- enough is enough, I say, save us trillions and bury your own dead. ( this wont happen, but it should)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Eyeball,You are right on and I would add Carter was the worst of the bunch and he continues to be a scumbag.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

And Scott;A vote for Barr is a vote for Obama. By all means, vote for Barr, Scott; this is America and you have that right. But if Obama wins this by a million votes, and he does it bcause Barr pulled two million away from McCain, I only hope the thought that you voted RIGHT is enough to make you happy by the time B.O. Hussein is finished with this country.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Oh, Mr. b;If I knew then what I know now, I would STILL vote for W over Al Gore (look how he has conducted himself since 2000) or John Kerry. I absolutely think that neither of the men he beat would have done as well as W has. However clumsy he may be portrayed by the press, W has faced challenges (911, catastrophic hurricanes, energy prices going through the roof worldwide) that were unprecedented in their complexity (at least when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, you knew who your enemy was and where to find him). Despite W's best efforts to tip the scales, I say the worst presidents the US has had since WWII were Clinton, Carter, and LBJ. So yeah, Mr. b, I'll advise you who to vote for.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I will be voting for McCain in November not because I am crazy about any one thing he says, but because he is infinitely better than Obama.Simple test. Who would the antigunners want us to vote for, if they could persuade us?Who would Al-quaeda and Hamas prefer to have in office?Whose box would Ahmenidjad have us ckeckmark this November?Can you imagine Kim Jong II asking us to vote for McCain?How about radical leftists of any stripe? Who would they like to see taking the Presidential oath this January?When in doubt, look who you're standing in line with.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

If Mr. Obomba tells the wold that he will not even consider to use a nuclear weapon I don't want him as president. Don't get me wrong I don't nuclear war. But I want a president that has the stones to take us to brinkmanship if he has too. With the climate in the middle east if some one pops a nuke off on US soil I want a president that will find out who did it and then level some Pakistani mountains.Tom the Troll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from james t wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

t. whelenby being an obama supporter you are giving up both. if you want to push obama, fine. just don't try to dump your blind ignorant crap on the rest of us who have realistic worries about liberty and security. obama likes to look down on others and wants to make everyone a subject instead of an individual. he wants you to serve him and his U.S. hating wife. vote for him if you want. you probably don't even have a firearm.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

It's McCain gentlemen!He was for amnesty, but after millions (?) of letters, e-mails and phone calls, he stated that he was wrong, and would not support amnesty but support a tighter border and enforcement of laws against hiring illegal workers.He listens to the people. Isn't that what you all want?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Silvertip wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I remember reading years ago the following: "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got"Do you trust any of these people who want to be president?Silvertip

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Col. T Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Those who would give up liberty for security deserve neither.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gerald Keller wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

The surest way to put Obama in the White House is to cast your vote for the third party candidate.Remember what happened when H.Ross Perrot boosted Clinton there.If you really want to vote for Obama or McCain,then go to the polls and vote,but Don't waste your vote on someone who has no chance of ever winning a majority.I would have preferred Ron Paul.Maybe next time.I'll go with McCain this time,because the alternative scares me to death

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"...federal law prohibiting a gun store within 5 miles of a school...." What the hell would this do? I'm not worried about school children buying a gun near their school and commiting a crime, I'm more concerned about the drug addicts, illegal immigrants, etc. who buy guns off the street or trade drugs for them. When will the politicians wake up and realize that criminals do not walk into Cabela's or Gander Mountain, fill out a federal form, (that is supposed to eliminate criminals from acquiring firearms) and leave with a legally purchased gun? This is an example of Obama's idea of protecting Americans? Wake up! I may not agree with everything McCain says, but he is damn sure a better candidate than Phi Slama Obama.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I think a few thoughts should be kept in mind from now until November. Obama grew up in the worst political climate in the US: the Chicago political machine. He is in no way to be trusted with any of our freedoms. Terrorism is not going to go away, nor is the hateful feelings most of the so called Islamic religious leaders have towards Americans. McCain served this country in the military and would be a better leader in times of danger to our overall freedoms. Obama is of the new breed of politician: interpret (change) the Constitution and Bill of Rights as you please. To A. Murphy and T. Whelan: peace and freedom is sometimes found only on the other side of war. The radical terrorists who hate the US and everything it stands for are at war with us whether you want it or not.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

McCain and Obama are both really TERRIBLE!!!!!! Obama for all the reasons stated above me. McCain is an Economic nightmare! He doesn't have a clue, the one thing Obama has on McCain is that yeah he'll raise your taxes to pay for the new stuff he'll add (which I DO NOT AGREE WITH WE NEED TO REPEAL THE 16th AMENDMENT!) where as McCain will cut some taxes BUT keep expanding the Federal GOvt. at the rate it is now. Also if you think McCain is a conservative because of the war and tax cuts (without spending cuts), your wrong. HIs views on immigration, the Firtst Amendment, his Second Amendment view isn't all that conservative, he "crosses the aisle" and thats just spineless, stand up for your ideas, if they are good ideals people will LISTEN. BlueOX is right when he said that the founding fathers are rolling in thier graves, hell they've probably augered themselves to china by now with all the spinning thier doin! John McCain has zero understanding of the Constitution, if he had an understanding he would stop saying how much of a better "Commander in Chief" he'd be. Does HE not understand that he's running to be President not the "Comander in Chief". Article 2 section. 2 says the President shall be Commander in Chief only when the we are at war. Now we may be occupying another country, but technically the Iraq war ended after we found Saddam in his rabbit hole. Also technically it was never a war but a conflict because the president acted on his own accord and Congress did not DECLARE war. Makeing it no different than Bosnia or Kuwait, or Somalia or any other soveriegn nation we wanted to intervene with.I"ll end now, by saying that if you want a real Conservative in the White House our best bet is to tell the Republicrats to go to hell and vote for the Libertarian Party Nominee Bob Barr, you know wasn't he the guy who led the Impeachment process on Bill Clinton. Read up on him you won't agree with everything but the stuff that you'll probably agree on are more important issues, and should take priority.All the yard signs for Obamab and McCain should replace the word President with the word Dictator, Obama wants to baby you, and McCain just really wants all the power to be in his hands(more than GWB already has) so he can wage wars for the 100, wait no 1000 years, and BANKRUPT US!!!!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

AT least he hasn't taken our guns.......but the cost to shoot them is going thru the roof.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"Uniter, not a divider"? "Washington outsider"? "Mission accomplished"?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I find it hard to believe that people here, that elected "W", then re-elected him, would so readily offer advice on who NOT to elect! How could some be so arrogant?!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Refresh my memory yooperjack--what qualifications did "W" have?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jes wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Sorry, but the references don't go thru. Guess that's why I don't usually see any here! Too bad! Check out the first on Black Bear Blog and the second on Reuters.com

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jes wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

This is one of Obama's latest, and earlier:"As president, I'm gong to make sure we know if guns are being sold by unscrupulous gun dealers not abiding by existing laws." (if he knows they arn't abiding by existing laws, then why aren't they arrested?")In 1999, Mr. Obama urged enactment of a federal law prohibiting the operation of any gun store within five miles of a school or park. This would eliminate gun stores from almost the entire inhabited portion of the United States.As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he "never saw or approved the questionnaire," and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.Read: Obama On Second Amendment. Let The Communities Decideand:Obama's Latest on Gun ControlEnjoy your rights, while you still have them!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

If only the founding fathers could see the monster their creation has become. They're spinning in their graves already.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I’m willing to bet that Shrillary is staying in the race and demanding to be so close hoping something tragic like an assassination would happen to Obama and I really will not put it past the Clintons. Maybe the Clinton Witch Doctors and extraterrestrial friends lost their Joba’Doo?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from brian wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Combine the current economic situation with Bush's low approval rating and it will be difficult for McCain to win. Hopefully Obama will piss enough people off in the swing states between now and November to give McCain the job. I wonder if people relise how far off the founding fathers beliefs Obama is.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

And from Barack Obama:"…I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right…" 4/16/08Can I get a big loud "HUH?" from everyone. At least Yogi Berra's malapropisms make some sense! This drivel just shows how little respect BHO has for the intelligence of the American electorate -- let's pray that he is wrong!DEP is right about the second best way to shut WHC up though (first is a chubby gal in a blue dress on her knees).SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from John Dean wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Amen gman!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Matt wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

F*** all of 'em, I'm voting Libertarian. And Obama won't run Hillary as his VP if he has a lick of sense. She will Grassy Knoll him as soon as he takes the oath of office.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I believe we're screwed no matter who gets into the oval office. I know it's kind of a crappy outlook, but I just don't know how else to see it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman,I think your just trying to stir us up.Is your surname Heavy by any chance?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Not only do most of you worry too much, you musta been sniffing the solvent again.If anybody got where they got because he was a "legacy," it's the current President. I'm sure Sen. McCain's family ties helped with Annapolis, too.Don't forget, Barack's Mom was a Caucasian lady from Kansas. You guys write about him like he's from Mars. And the way you rag on his tax proposals. Sweet creeping hominy! Have you ever thought about what happens when the Feds cut your tax bill? The state and local guys raise it because they ain't getting the Fed money anymore.If you were Pinkos, I'd offer to help y'all pack for Canada if he's elected.I mean it. I'm voting for Barack and going into the woods not long after, completely confident he'll do a fine job. Good golly, after what GWB has done to the Bill of Rights, you'd think you guys would give a man who ain't even elected yet the benefit of the doubt.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flipper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

National Public Radio did an all day salute to veterans today in honor of D-Day, it was inspiring! Might see if you can get the podcast. I was disappointed in Rush's coverage.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Anybody named Bubba or Islam can kiss my grits!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bubba Islam wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

You guys make a lot of sense. Great insight into the first 10 amendments to the constitution. Who needs Harvard Law! I'll take 6th grade any day!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Someone asked if anyone remembered what what day it is today. Other than Rush, I haven't heard a word out of the media about what happened 64 years ago. But that's not surprising. Those guys really were of "The Greatest Generation". We owe them a debt of gratitude we can never, ever repay.As far as this upcoming election is concerned, while I'm not real happy with McCain, I'll probably vote for him for one reason and one reason only. Supreme Court nominees. One of the few good things I can say about Junior is his pics for the USSC. Even his old man managed to screw that up. If you want to have trouble sleeping tonight, just think about what you're gonna get if BO is elected.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I can see it now, Hillary is chosen as Obama's running mate, he win's in November, she and Bill hire their old Sweetwater hitman to take out Obama and presto she's the president and Bill's dipping cigars again. We all start hiding our guns in 8inch pvc tubes buried as deep as we can dig a hole and we all wonder what the #*@!! happened again!! Please- everyone pull your and your neighbors head out and vote for McCain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Martin Luther King was a man of the Lord first and a civil rights activist and leader second. He inspired many to act based on faith and a renewed sense of right and wrong.Obama is a reflection of what is wrong in this great nation - - letting the few lead the rest of us around by the noses just because they are somehow an elevated "victim" class. He won't fix anything the Chicago machine doesn't tell him to do. He is just a cheap suit in front of screaming liberals in the DNC led by the likes of Howard Dean.He would be wise to not pick Hillary as a VP. She has already remebered and referenced the Kennedy assassination.....I'm glad Audie Murphy and T. Whelen (See Above) are for Obama. He will need all the dead people the Dems can round up to vote for him since many of us can smell the difference.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Don’t think any of us need worry about Hillary being VP. That woman comes with huge baggage, Bill Clinton being the biggest. As DP said Bill's an erratic, egomaniac with a big mouth. No telling what hurtful things that man would do or say given the spot light.Last thing Hillary wants is a successful ’08 Obama Campaign and PresidencySHE SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN IT and she will in 2012. She would be the most disloyal, spiteful and resentful person I could ever imagine running for or being VP. ….Leaks to the Press, Anyone?????What I believe important is the radical, conservative Right of the GOP and the radical, liberal Left of the Democratic Party are on the outs. Both wings are screaming like souls in torment now, but the People want moderates and are giving moderates a chance. This is very healthy for the country.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FH wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Diehl,Clay CooperWell said boys.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Dr. RalphGood point Martin Luther King Jr.Interesting fact of Martin Luther King Jr, he walked with even Charlton Heston and you see how the Democrats have labeled him as the enemy. I have learned that the wicked and those that are to do wrong to others quickly call others names. They quickly label people and to claim what is not rightfully theirs to get the upper hand.Martin Luther King JrWas not a Republican yet they walked with him!Was not a Democrat yet they walked with him!Was not a Independent yet they walked with him!He rose above it all because he truly belonged to Gods party. His family allowed the Democratic Party to highjack his name to use it as a weapon for political and monetary gain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

It’s going to be very interesting on how many more Obama freaks will come out of the word work as time goes nearer to Election Day! Obama either stepped in it or needs to change his shorts and man is the stench getting really rank! If I was Obama, I’d watch my back; Hillary isn’t done yet and never will be!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Andrew wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Do the math Obama wants a 47-55% federal tax rate. He will raise the marginal rate to 39% from 33 and add 8-16% social security tax on all income. This would be a disaster for business and job growth. What is really scary is his motivation for raises taxes is to punish the rich not collect revenue. His global warming hysteria would regulate our economy to death and send even more job to China and India- which would cause more pollution. He and his bitter wife were handed most of what they have because of their race. Neither would have a snowballs chance in hell of admission to Harvard if the were white or Asian. I have no idea why an affirmative action project like his wife who was given access to the best college on the planet hates our country so much.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Old Bull wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I tried to keep up with the one hangun a month proposal, but found I was going broke after a few months.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Time to dust off "Saving Private Ryan" and watch the first fifteen minutes... like most of our war heroes say, the real heroes are the ones who never made it home.Strange how Martin Luther King Jr. said "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" and yet Obama's character is indeed lacking and he has succeeded mainly because of people who are voting for him based on the color of his skin.My name is a link to McCain's gun control record.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Dave Writes:And from Barack Obama:"…I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right…" 4/16/08When I want to piss of some of my liberal friends who are pro gun control, I reply to them:"I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to freedom of religion. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."Kind of shocks them when you target one of the constitutional rights they happent to value and put it in the same sort of jeopordy that they would impose on the 2nd Amendment. They usually begin to "get it" that the right for citizens to own firearms is a Civil Right that is as important as the right to vote, the right to security from unreasonable search and seizure, the right to an attorney in a criminal proceeding, etc etc etc.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Col. T. Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I'm with Mr. Murphy. Hopefully my kids won't have to go to Iraq!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Audie Murphy wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I'm voting for Obama!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dinfos wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

how come no one in the media is mentioning D-Day anniversary today??? I'm with you Jack, best off topic post I've seen.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Barack Hussein Obama is an Affirmative Action candidate. Would you go to a doctor, or dentist, if the only qualification was the person's skin color? I doubt it. Yet, many people will vote for this man, solely on his ethnic background. This is insanity. He has only the minimum qualifications. He's arrogant. He can't give a speech without a teleprompter. Besides that, he thinks there are fifty-eight states.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dgrigz wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

To: Mr. Smith goes to Washington"Hillary is out of the picture as President forever!!!!"No one is ever out of a run for president forever, especially if they only lost in a primary.How many times has Biden tried(horrible example)? Do you honestly think that if McCain is elected that in 2010 she won't have learned her lessons from 2007-2008 and make another push if she got this far? If you do, you are greatly mistaken. If she does run again, you can buy me a beer.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mr. Smith goes to Washington wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Obama would never be my first choice but you're all missing the point. Hillary is out of the picture as President forever!!!! That's the best news I've ever heard. She is evil incarnate, period. Just having to look at her ugly mug for 4 years is scary enough. Obama, knows how to play politics. If people want guns he'll be pro-guns. We need to get the word out that we want guns. i.e. Join or renew your NRA memberships, today! Write your congressmen, senators etc. Make your opinions known. The firearms industry is one of the last successful, profitable US industries. As things get worst economically with the devalued dollar, the global economy etc. we need all the healthy US industries we can get. Other than Automobiles and firearms (and software) what do me make here?? Not much comes to mind.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Speaking of politicians, most of them should take time out today to shut their pie holes and reflect upon this day.Taking time out here to salute the men of Operation Overlord. Most especially my Uncle Leo, a farmer, hunter and soldier.Pvt. Leo Beals101st Airborne501st PIR - Company CKIA - June 6, 1944God bless you and thank you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Yes, I remember well how we got 8 yr of Bubba 'cause we were PO'd at Bush. Let's not repeat that poor decision and support McCain. O'bama scares the heck out of me for too many reasons to list.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JMH wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman, I hope that was an attempt at satire. Obama is a socialist, dictator wanna-be. Obama is an elitist, who wants to tell the rest of us how we should live (and then thank him for sharing his "wisdom"). His ideas (socialization of programs) requires social state taxes (50 to 85 % of your income). I don't think tax paying Americans can afford Obama.JMH

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dgrigz wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Obama is for sure a Marxist, when hezbollah PR people say they like the guy one has to wonder. His associations sure don't seem like his "Community Activism" was sponsoring bake sales and church bazaars so that a soup kitchen could be funded. As an accountant, reviewing his taxation policies make me wonder if he even went to schools like Princeton/Harvard because they make no sense. Tell me when anyone who has studies law on the left and held office has actually tried to defend the rights and liberties that we have now as opposed to establishing new "liberty limiting regulations". Is it no small coincidence that gun ownership is not viewed with such sacredness on the left as the rights of free press are to pedophiles?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FH wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Sorry GMAN but Obamma is run by the Chicago Dailey Politico machine and they think that gun laws actually work i.e. look how restrictive Chicago is. He also is very confused on Taxes, he thinks they should be raised to fund more Gov programs. He is a Marxist.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Oh, Obama will be no worse than the current occupant of the WH on 2A.You guys worry too much.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

While the SCOTUS will probably uphold the 2nd, Obama has already proven to me that while it's a person legal right to keep and bear arms, the arms he may keep will (in his eyes) be up to the government.Second, I don't see Obama putting Hillary on the ticket. Between her and Bubba, they would steal too much of his thunder.Regardless, McCain has his hands full as he reminds me of Nixon (in the way he handles himself in front of the teleprompter) and Obama is much more @ ease like Kennedy was in the Kennedy/Nixon contest of 1960.I just hope McCain can put out good ideas and sell the to the majority of the American people.He has my vote.Jim

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Just what part of Constituional Law did Osama study at Harvard?Since when can State or local ordinances overide Federal law? Certainly states have exercised the ability to regulate use of firearms, but not overruling the fundamental right to keep and bear arms. The DC handgun ban resolution should clear that up, for a while anyway.Dittos. Be careful what you wish for!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Amen, afraid we ain't seen nothin yet.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jay wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I think the folks on this blog need to be careful what they wish for. Barack Obama is far more liberal and more anti gun than Hillary Clinton.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mr. Smith goes to Washington wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

You've got to admit one thing, Hillary had the nomination in the bag BEFORE Obama showed up. I still crackup every time I see Hillary with that look of "I'm not winning...????" You've got to admit we all owe Obama a debt of gratitude for taking her out of the running. She would have been guns owners worst NIGHTMARE!!! Bar none.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 39 weeks ago

We need another Martha Mitchell right now with this loud mouth Biden guy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill wrote 3 years 41 weeks ago

I just got back from the San Juan Islands and Seattle in Washington state. We're doomed!.... The militant socialists up there are on the rampage with the election so near and all. Someone needs to sit them all down and cool their jets by letting them in on the fact that the "R" party is really on their side on so many of the issues! It's just an election year and so all of the Mcains are out there throwing red meat to all of the sponges in the "R" base. The Mcains will all go back to being the socialist sympathizing gutless wonders they really are after the election! J.M. is a heck of a good guy, its just that if this is what we are going to hold up as White House material this time around, just imagine how low our standards will be next time! This should come as a surprise to no one...The "R" party's love affair with big government has become increasingly worse since Bush took office.Time to join the Constitution party!.....Look into it!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CB Jackson wrote 3 years 46 weeks ago

Womans Day 19 Feb 02 p 26 in “Woman at the Wheel” by Jayne O’Donnell reported “It's a statistic no parent wants to hear: Cars are the leading cause of death from unintentional injury for children under 14”. Using the line or reasoning gun control folks use i.e. an inanimate object injured or killed someone, we then should get rid of those bad cars that are killing our children. People take driving education courses, are licensed to drive and the vehicle is also registered and licensed but still all this “registering” does not prevent injury. Good/proper use behavior using the inanimate object is critical. Bad behavior leads to injury good behavior prevents injury. Hundreds if not thousands of people are effected by car accidents but cars are not the easily attacked item as firearms are. What’s next? Taking away steak knives, baseball bats? I can easily injury/kill someone with a plastic or metal pen if after penetrating the eye, temple (head). Behavior is the key and as we well know “it’s not my fault” attitude is prevalent in our society. Someone or something else is to blame i.e. the no fault, entitlement lifestyle.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

We don;t realy need a President any longer. The Supreme Court has us by the balls and continue to squeze till we cry. Had it not been for them in 2000, we would not be in this mess we are today. To think that a 4-5 decision put GWB in the WH is beyond me. I sure hope who-ever wins this useless election in NOV. has the gall to select long term thinking Justices. Correct em if I am mistaken, but best I recall, NAFTA was begun under the first Bush???? however Clinton did sign the final bill, a bad mistake. But Clinton does not deserve all the blame for NAFTA. I am not the brains of you gys, but to me, if we are to allow other countries to import products to the USA, then those counties should have to export from the USA the same Dollar amount.I have never been so un-certain about the future of the USA as I am now. With the two poor choices we got to choose from, can anyone predict what either will do. Obama only says Change, (Change what and How) McCain says more of the same, we will be in Iraq for l00 yrs. The USA cannot afford to continue to spend 3 million dollars a Day in Iraq. AS for 911 Bush went after the wrong country, he should have called a spcial session of congress and then decided on whom to go after.In my book it would have been Sad/Araba. Belive l5 of those on the planes were from that country. We did what we set out to do I thought and that was to get rid of Hussein and Bin Laden. Well, we did l/2 the job and Afg. is in more turmoil today than on the onset. Bushes MIssion Accompolished banner on the Battle ship was a tad early.Yep, I',m a Dem but not for Obama,or his wife,she is a scary as he is, as she hates the USA.BAck to Tim R. We will all miss his imput thru-out this falls election and then afterwards on Sunday. I am pleased that Tom Brokaw will fill in on Meet the Press on Sunday till after Jan. 20th. This war in Iraq is breaking the USA, how much longer can we spend the amount of $$ and supplies as we are today. As for Oil, I do believe that BOOTLEggERS are buying lots of oil and storing till it gets even higher. I cannot believe we buring that much more oil than we did 2 yrs ago. As smart as the USA is, why cannot we come up with a alternate to gas for our needs. If we got the brains to ship men and equiptment to the Moon, surely somebody can find a replacement for gas. I recall in the 70's the Solar Panels were a hot #, has anyone looked into returning to those to help heat our homes and run our cars. I Live in the Country have lots of timber and have plenty of down wood, so will now begin to heat my home again with wood and a nice cozy fireplace. Sure will be glad when Hunting season begins, so can talk about my favorit subjects, GUNS AND HUNTING. As for Rocky Mtn hunts, at todays cost, I may have made my last trip West and just hunt w-tails and Coyotes here at home. AS my retirement funds continue to earn less each renewal and you sure cannot pay your bills on SS.Being disabled/handicapped, kinda hard to be a greeter at Wally-world. PS' Heard that Ford Motor Co was going to bring back the Fiesta small car. Guess what???? to be built in Mexico. Why not use the plants Ford has here in the US and let the Illegals work for the pay they earned in Mexico, then we all cold buy a litle car and save the gas and maybe our homes.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

I still think he was the best on the air today (er, recently).PS., Scooter never impressed me much either. So who do you believe? JMO.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

About as unbiased as a reporter can be... if he's a lifelong Democrat who has worked for Daniel Moynihan D NY, Mario Cuomo D NY, and met his wife at the 1976 Democratic convention. His son now hosts a radio show with James Carville the left wing attack dog. He was also the first to leak the identity of CIA agent Valerie Plame according to Scooter Libby, and Russert never denied it... sad to think that this is as close to non-partisan as the Networks hire.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

RMH,I'm glad you said that.If Tim R. interviewed a Dem. you would think he was Rep., if he interv. a Rep. you thought he was Dem. Good man.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

I never missed a Sunday AM ( if was athome)watching Meet the Press. I feel as if Tim was by far the better News Anchor on the air so many years. To me he was down the middle. Cannot recall in him ever taking sides with Rep or Dems. I shall miss him this Sunday and all the Sundays I have left, plus his imput in the fall election. Rest in Peace Tim.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Obama's sock puppet wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

Buy now while supplies are still available.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

WAM:I certainly agree that a "normal" person (you and I) wouldn't spend a lot of time at HP. I don't know why I was there! I just noted the bomb that was thrown, and waited for the MSM coverage. I was stunned by the silence! Obviously, they don't want this out in the public. As I said, the interviewer is somewhat widely known, and respected as a liberal jounalist. That's how he got the interview. BTW, I went back a couple of days after Tim Russert died. I was shocked at the responses posted there. While many were sincere expressions of condolence, many were also slams on his integrity and alleged collusion with the Bush Administration. A few were outright lies and unfounded character assassination. I was very disappointed. I would've thought that human beings would have more class.YooperJackP.S. Can you imagine the sight of Sec. Powell, in stripes and handcuffed, being arraigned? That will do wonders to unify this country!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

YooperI had not heard of Obama's war prosecution statements you mentioned. I think the Huffington Post is as full of manure as Obama is.JMHO

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

Yoop,Oh America needs him, its just a large percentage don't realize how much. BTW, my son pre-enlisted in Marines a week ago.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 48 weeks ago

Okay, I remember an incident that happened in NYC, on 9/11/01. For some reason, roughly 3,000 Americans died that day. A lot of us in "the sticks" were greatly moved by that horrible incident. We sent our sons and daughters to avenge that attack, and also to insure that it doesn't recur. For the most part, this endeavor has been successful.Now we learn, from one of the candidates, that our retaliation, and steps toward prevention, were wrong. It should've been handled in the courts! About a month ago, I read an article on Huffington Post, an article, where a "journalist" interviewed Barack Obama. In this interview, Barack said that his first priority as POTUS will be to use Department of Justice. to investigate all aspects of the GWB war in SW Asia, and the war on terror. The goal of this investigation will be to prosecute everyone, involved in the decision to go to war, anyone involved in war crimes and anyone involed in illegal acts such as wiretapping. The suspects include, but are not limited to, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, George Tenet and John Ashscoft.For some reason, this interview got no airtime. Rush Limbaugh didn't mention it until last week. No one else said anything at all about it.My son has a decision to make shortly. Should he reenlist, or get out. My thoughts right now are, if the people in urban areas cared about their security, they would voice their opinions, either at ballot boxes, or protests, or even letters to their editors. Any opinions they do have, appear to indicate that the are OK with that large hole in the ground. I told my son to reup for economic reasons, reup because you like the job, but don't reup because America needs you.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

FlipA prime example is the liberal porno-judge in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in CA. The SC, federal, and state judges have been and are legislating from the bench. That needs to stop!But I suppose if one is a left wing liberal, that is just fine. I will vote for the candidate that most closely reflects my values and world view. In 2008, it will not be the son of a Muslim and an atheist, who rails on his family about being racist and fails to salute the flag during the Pledge of Allegiance.I didn't spend 22 years defending this nation and those since financing that defense to pi$$ my vote away on some candidate of "change" who makes no sense with any proposed change. We all can imagine who he would nominate for the Supremes. Maybe Rev Whatshisname?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter:Thank you for an excellent response to Steve S. The reality is that none of us are not going to change the minds of liberal Democrats no matter what we say. You would think the recent SC decision re Gitmo and "enemy combatants" (none of whom were in uniform, BTW) would at least give the libs a hint, but that's not going to happen either. GWB has been a disappointment to most of us, but as you said, he isn't running. Of the two guys who are, neither of whom I'm impressed with, I'm voting for McCain, and the primary reason is his ability to affect the makeup of the Supreme Court. It remains to be seen how this Court comes down on the DC/gun issue. As intuitively obvious as it would seem to most of us, the sad fact is that one SC Judge - Kennedy - will probably throw it one way or the other. It makes no sense to me, but what the hell do I know. I'm just sick and tired of liberal judges all over this great country who seem to feel they have the God-given right to interpret the US Constitution any way they see fit. And no matter what history says about GWB, his SC picks may turn out to be his greatest legacy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Steve S.Here goes:"Why does a city like NYC, which was actually struck by terrorism, vote overwhelmingly Democratic?"Because it is filled with entitlement hungry liberals like every other major city in America."If the people who lived the attacks first hand, are sick of Bush style policies, and want change, why is it that all of the yooperjacks of the world, who are probably far from any real target, feel the need to educate us about policy?"The Yoopers of the world live a sane life ouside of the crime centers and cesspools of our society and have a clarity of perspective, I suppose. It's not all about being a target."I walk by the WTC site everyday, and I sure as heck don't want 4 more years of the same policies..."The WTC 9/11 attack was the second attempt by the Islamic terrorists to destroy a symbol of what they perceive as the satanic nation (us). the 9/11 attack occured less than 9 months after W took office. This plot had been in the making for years. Presumably these plots, along with several other attacks, were hatched during the illustrious years of the Clinton administration. The Democrats have paid little attention to the problem as well.If you are tired of the status quo, you are certainly entitled to express your opinions and vote them. However, don't blame GWB for the Islamic extremist attacks. Check your facts. There have been damn fewer attacks on U.S. interests the past 8 years than the previous 8. Remember the USS Cole, our embassy in Kenya, Khobal Towers in Saudi Arabia, .....If you are a liberal Democrat, then say something substantive about your candidate and how he is going to fix things. Stop blaming Bush as your campaign slogan. He is not running for re-election. If he were, I wouldn't vote for him either. As a Republican, he has disappointed me in many areas, too. Just call a spade a spade.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

From the 2 running for Pres. neithe will do anything to help you and I. Neither can do l2 of what they promish, thats just talk. As someone suggeeted we need the Pres. and V-pres running seperate, as we do in my state for Governor and Let. Gov. THe Dark skinned man can and does talk smooth, says what everone wants to hear, McCain says same thingds as Bush did for 8 yrs, more of the same. If ever a country needed a shot in the arm it's the USA. Not teh same Bull S---- again for 4 more years or longer. Where is Truman----????? we need a few like him now.When you pay 6-7 bucks for gas in a few months, recall what Bush has done in the Middle east to make peace. He's not taking a world vacation at our expense but doing nothing to make peace with the middle east and the USA. This election is by far the worst in my lifetime @73, I've seen a few and some were ok, but this one will break the bank and your back. All due-respect, I do think we should get back to our pleasure, which is hunting and guns????? Any one agree?.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Can someone on this blog, please answer this for me...?Why does a city like NYC, which was actually struck by terrorism, vote overwhelmingly Democratic ?If the people who lived the attacks first hand, are sick of Bush style policies, and want change, why is it that all of the yooperjacks of the world, who are probably far from any real target, feel the need to educate us about policy?I walk by the WTC site everyday, and I sure as heck don't want 4 more years of the same policies...

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Well I'm sure they have a website you can search. I tried, but I didn't get any figure near what you supplied. Not to insult you at all, but "I saw it somewhere" doesn't mean much. I would appreciate it if you could get a source.I would also appreciate it if you could explain to me what those 50,000 "AQ" had to gain by fighting there, instead of coming here and fighting. Or fighting military families in Germany. Or bombing the embassy in Canada. Or shooting up a hotel filled with tourists in Mexico. Doesn't it seem like 1, out of 50,000 could get into Mexico legally, and then buy a gun there? They fought in Iraq because they were there, not because that was the "terrorist" battle of their choosing. Or, you could convince me otherwise.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Tim:I saw it on TV a few months ago. Could've been Fox, maybe NBC. Also, the unemployment rate thing was somewhere around the last two or three quarters of the Carter Term.Anyway, this is why we fought! So you and I would have the freedom to do this! We probably wouldn't be doing this in some parts of the world.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Yooper,How do you figure that we have killed 50,000 AQ there? Do you have a source? I looked at some estimates ranging from 84k to 92k, but that was for "civilian" and I don't know if they are including insurgents, or true civilians (if there is such a thing there, it would only be the young children). Anyways, but I don't think that there is any way we have killed 50k men that were in any way affiliated with AQ.I am sure that we have killed way more than 50,000 people there, but that doesn't mean they were AQ. Very few of the guys that my units killed had any type of training; most were just everyday morons out doing bad stuff, either for revenge, because they were threatened, or they just wanted us to leave, but that doesn't make them AQ. It makes them guys that were trying to kill us for a variety of reasons. We did kill a lot of foreigners in Fallujah, but that was the exception rather than the rule. I personally think its a stretch to say that any of them would have come here if they didn't go to Iraq, but thats just me. Wouldn't it make so much more sense for them to come here? Why go there and really have little impact on us in the long term, when they could come here and have a huge impact with one rifle in a shopping mall or day care? They were there, and didn't have the means to come here and do things like that. The only explanation for that is that they didn't have anything to do with AQ.Regarding your comment about no jobs when you graduate, if I have to have a bad job (which would surely be worse than if I had no college or other training) I would at least like to be educated and poor, vs uneducated and poor.I am not a huge fan of Obama, but I do believe that he is by far the lesser of two evils. I do not belive he has the answer for everything, but as I stated earlier, Iraq is my biggest issue for the upcoming election, and he plans to do what I consider the right thing, when Senator McCain (whom I respect quite a bit, but mainly for his past service) will do what I consider the wrong thing. I'd like to see a much more right leaning Dem that would like to get out of Iraq, or a more left leaning Republican that would do the same, but neither of those will happen. Not in this election at least.Oh, those stats are from the Dept of Labor. I might be misinterpreting them, but I don't think so. Maybe the rate was that high in your local area, and not nationally.BTW, you're welcome for my service lol.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedicI can't believe those stats! I remember MUCH HIGHER figures on television!BTW, THANK YOU FOR YOR SERVICE!!As a veteran, you know that the price of freedom is never free! I believe that our troops have killed somewhere around 50,000 al Qaeda since we invaded Iraq. That's 50,000 who would've come here, but chose to go to Iraq, because Americans could be killed there. They would have come here!I know that John McCain voted against the new GI Bill. I'm sorry he did. However, what good is a college education if there are no jobs when you graduate? Obama is just plain arrogant when it comes to the economy. Also, if he's not scripted, he can't think and talk at the sdame time. He can only read well. I honestly believe, if not for Affirmative Action, he'd be the happy man at Walmart!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

YooperJack,I doubt these things will get better by doing the same thing, do you?Do you think that by staying in Iraq, or possibly invading Iran, that we will have less Americans get killed than if we left Iraq? Hell, there were more Saudis involved in 911 than any other nationality, and we continue to be in bed with them. Seems to me that maybe we should continue our war with Afghanistan, and go to war with Saudi. They attacked us, not Iraq. I have spent more than 2 years of my life in Iraq, in two different units, and believe me, most of the time, we are fighting to maintain security there, not making any types of dents in any terrorist organization (which didn't exist before we invaded and spent too much time there.) If we left Iraq, less citizens would be killed. Not more. Maybe then we could send more troops to Afghanistan to fight Al-Qaeda. You know, the guys that attacked us? Obama has said this about Afghanistan "The first step must be getting off the wrong battlefield in Iraq, and taking the fight to the terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan" http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/the_war_we_need_to_win.phpYeah, he sounds pretty weak on terrorism when he says "As President, I would deploy at least two additional brigades to Afghanistan to re-enforce our counter-terrorism operations and support NATO's efforts against the Taliban. As we step up our commitment, our European friends must do the same, and without the burdensome restrictions that have hampered NATO's efforts." Sounds weak huh? Because he wants to send more troops there, and encourage Europeans to do the same? Ummmmmmmmm.... Yeah, hes weak on terrorism huh?Since you implied that veterans would have to apologize to get jobs (you did say "Viet Nam Vets had to appologize when they applied for jobs. This is what "Osama" Obama is promising us for our future.") maybe we can talk for a second about who would do most for veterans. Obama supports the new GI Bill, McCain does not. Obama supports it as the right thing to do by veterans, McCain does not support it because he thinks it will hurt retention. He cites a study done by the Army that says it will lead to a 16% drop in retention. Sadly, the study also says that it will raise recruitment by 16%. The Army's goals of initial enlistment are normally about 80,000, and the reenlistment goal is normally about 60,000. That means, if the study is accurate, that we will have a larger Army WITH the new GI Bill, vs before it.Also, while I am no fan of Carter (yes, I'm too young to remember anything but very vague things about him, but I can, and do, read books, and talk to my family about their opinions of things past) you said that unemployment was "around 14 per cent". The Bureau of Labor disagrees with you. According to them, for 1977 we had 7.1%, 78 we had 6.1, 79 we had 5.8, 80 we had 7.1, 81 we had 7.6.http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm In the years following, it continued to raise, and that of course is mainly due to him, but Reagan also played a role in those years as well.Anyways, I guess we will see what was the right thing to do in 15 or 20 years. Hindsight is always 20-20, but I think that going after the guys that attacked us, instead of some moron tired of us being in his country will be the right thing to do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

YooperI am with you! B Hussein Obama poses terrible risks to our national security! Eloquent speeches aren't going to keep emboldened Islamic terrorists from further attacks on our own soil!McCain is a nitty gritty guy with a lot of experience, the ability to build coalitions and he'll get things done.Funny thing; the Dems have been less inclined to take pot shots at our 'failing' health care system since Teddy K had his life saved by that same system! Coincidence? I don't think so!SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMHAn interesting, if self contradicting, ramble at me. In the late '30s and early '40s that patron saint of the Democratic party -- FDR (and Queen Eleanor) was residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC; FDR did more to socialize the US than any President before or since. Sure LBJ tried! Klintonista I also tried! But FDR and Eleanor forced their socialist 'reforms' into the landscape.I can not agree that as a country we would have been better with either Gore or Kerry. No GWB is not wonderful but he did LEAD us through several unprecedented disasters including 9/11 and Katrina. I know that not everyone is better off now than when Klintonista's reigned but in large part the movement of manufacturing jobs to Mexico, China and India was well underway by 2000. Klinton pushed for and celebrated NAFTA and other pacts which have encouraged further weakening of US Manufacturing. Hopefully the lower U$D will make it more feasable to manufacture here!SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedic:I didn't read anything you wrote except in this post. I do know that you are grossly mistaken with your idea tha things can't be much worse. BHO is soft on Islamic terrorism. If he's elected, Americans will die! Also, you're probably too young to remember Carter. We had unemployment around 14 per cent. Viet Nam Vets had to appologize when they applied for jobs. This is what "Osama" Obama is promising us for our future. The man is a borderline moron. He will gladly raise unemployment to implement a "fair tax" code. If that means raising the deficit, so be it. Also, apparently, he has no energy policy short of you not driving, eating, or heating your home.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedic,You had another post on a different blog that I combined into one.The matter of awarding or earning a medal was hashed over some time ago. Especially by veterans, read back.Give the man a break, I'm sure dave entertains us with these blogs on his coffee break.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Things to nitpick about? You are right, our huge national debt, our repeated violations of our own constitution, our disgusting environmental policies and our flourishing economy are things that are really unimportant in the big scheme of things. Yes, lets "nitpik" about those.He may not be our answer, but he is something different, and we surely do not need more of the same crap that we have been enduring.I will be sitting with Obama, not another image of Bush. Don't worry about it. If you want more of the same, by all means, go get more of the same.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

timthemedic,Well then go sit with BO and think of some more things to nitpik about. What you people think this guy can do with promises of 'change' I don't know. He hasn't shown anything but a penchant for spouting big things and worshipping with a hate monger.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from timthemedic wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Though I do not like Obama's stance on gun control, it is relatively low on my priority list of what I care about this election.I care much more about Iraq, the economy, and trying to un-copulate what the "honorable" Mr. Bush has done.I believe that Obama is the one that can fix these things, not McCain. Our country cannot (reasonably) get much worse off right now, and McCain wants more of the same. I do not, and I most certainly will not be voting for him.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

For all his virtues as a man, I don't know if McCain would win. Having read David Halberstam's "The Powers That Be" (and other literature on Nixon-Kennedy before that), I'm also aware that TV holds the key to getting elected.McCain looks like an older, kinder version of Billy Bob Thornton. Especially when he smiles. Which is not particularly appealing. Obama will smoke him in a TV debate.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

I saw a news story last night on T.V. about a group of sportsmen in Wyoming who have paired up with the environmentalist movement to stop the drilling for natural gas south of Grand Teton. While the thought of a bunch of drilling at the base of the pristine mountain ranges does bother me, I am even more disturbed that these sportsmen don't seem to understand just who these environmentalists are and what the ultimate result of their goals would be!In their heart of hearts, these wine and cheese socialists see these sportsmen as a bunch of hay seed hicks with "guns" in their pickups! Deep down they cannot bear the thought of these "blood thirsty moronic cowboys" defiling the mountains with their Wal-mart hunting boots. They see us as a bunch of traditional "unwashed" American idiots going about raping and destroying the land and "consuming" it's resources! The way they see it, the land is only fit for "good stewards of the environment" like themselves! If they had their way, only they would be permitted to set foot on many of these public lands armed only with a cork-screw and a cutting board in one hand and a copy of Mine Kampf in the other!My point is, while it may seem in the best interest of both these groups to stand against this drilling right now, it is only a matter of time before the environmentalists turn on the sportsmen and start to insist that, they too, should worship at the shine of big government! They may demand that the sportsmen stop hunting and fishing and may even start to demand that in certain areas, there be restrictions on the number of people allowed in those areas each day! You see, the environmentalists, the anti-hunters, and the anti- gunners are pretty much all the same bunch of Marxists!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Silver Arrow:Yes, we all did make more $$$ from 92-2000 and more jobs available then also. When CD rates were at 8% or more depending on the Amount you invested and what term. Now, CD's on any term are less than 4%, to my figures that 50% less income from your investment. As for Jobs, non left here where I live, all the mfgering plants closed and moved to Mexico or some of-shore island. People I know are now driving from 25 to 200 miles to find work and at less salary than back in the 90's. I care less who is in the WH,as long as he don't get in my bilfold , then it hurts. My life style has changed to the income available to me, and if you really check the numbers on lost jobs and incomes from the working class you will see what I;m saying is true.The well-off have gotten even more well off and us peons have gotten worse off. Bring back the 90's for me and I will hunt more out West and buy more firearms. O, forgot, what was the price of gas in the 90's and today its over 4 bucks and continues to climb. With 2 oil well junkies in the WH, they making the well off happy. Doubt you recall the late 30's and early 40's, when times were realy tough, more people lost their property than those today. I recall my family waspaying for our farm and the yearly payment was 450.00. Several years, we only could pay the interest.Not until the early 50's did things improve and we paid the farm off, by my Dad and Mom working 2nd shift jobs at a sock mill and farming as well. I was a little shaver, but recall the sleepless nights my parents never slept, worring about loosing our home and farm. At l0 yrs old I began working after school and Sat. and Sundays to help out. That was the best education ever offered, as you learned how to make a living.And, I was born in the USA, not some other planet as our population now shows the many transplants we support. Wait till the Ilegal;s begin to draw SS that you paid in, your retirement is going to them, not being invested for your retirement. years.Sadly, no improvements in sight. Get real and check history of the 90's as compared to todays.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

A note from my Dealer; listed below.I've been in business for 40 years, and 40 years ago gun retailers would cry,"Why cain't I get products at the same price as Sears?" Forty years later it's,"Why cain't I get products at the same price as Wal-mart? The unwanted truth is that Wal-Mart has their firearms manager at the plant in CHINA. The product goes from China to the USA Wal-mart warehouse. The warehouse is totally computerized and connected to evry cash register in evry Wal-Mart store in the USA,and the world. Wal-Mart has 24/7 real time iventory control. The computer calculates how fast the product is selling, when and how much it needs to re-order,and sends the order directly to the factory in China with a time frame. A Wal-mart product makes two stops, the last stop beig the counter in a retail store. That's a significant advantage when diesel fuel is $5.00 a gallon, and on it's way to $10.00 a gallon.Some of you guys may recall my stating some time back, that I did not think Wal-mart sold the quality firearms as your local dealer does. I had planned on a new Remington Model 770 , looked at one at Wal-mart and was a piece of junk. Then I went to my Dealer and saw the same gun. No comparison in quality,fitting of metal and wood or Syn, plus the metal at Wal-marts was a thin as Paper. Needless to say I forgot the 770 and had heard of the MArlin XL7. So after reading on the testing of the XL7 by Wayne Van Zool and a couple other writers and testers, I ask my dealer to order one for me, with the understanding if not the quality advertised I would not take, he agreed as he wanted one also. So the XL7 arrived, and I was thrilled. It is a quality built firearm as all MArlin guns have been. It is a combination of a Wincheser 70 and a Rem 700 and the Savage Accu-trigger. Stock , SYN, fits like a glove and love the trigger and how easy to adjust. Plus it's several dollars cheapr than the Rem 770. So guys, I just wanted to let you all know that my thinking that many Wal-mart guns wore a USA name, but Mfgerd in China. Better still, if we don't trade,. buy from our local dealers, Wal-mart will soon run them out of business as it has to the Mom and Pop small stors. I;m willing to allow my dealer to make a few dollars over the Wal-mart price, as if got a problem, he will handle, try that with Wal-mart. Also, this Dealer thinks handguns and home defence shotguns l8"bbls will increase in sales thru 2008 and 2009, as the younger generation feels the 2nd Amd. is going to drown prior to 3-4 Members of the Supreme court retires in next 2-3 yrs. My dealers also stats, those of us who do not reload, better buy up a supply of ammo fast, as the cost is going out of site, as China and JApan buying all the lead they can get. I noticed my Brand and caliber of Ammo has gone up over 30% since last year. Even Wal-mart's ammo is up, if you trust it to be USA made. We as sportsmen, better for our on benefit, buy from our local dealers all we can. I'm, guilty of buying junk I think will help, but in fact, a waste of $$. I will begin shopping at my local dealers and be happy. Shoot-um-straight and often. The old Gunslinger.PS: The above Info came from the American Firearms Industry,that usually is correct 99% of the time.And I trust my 70+ dealer.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Hunter. Canot recall the resturant, but is one block of main street near the Museum. Not fancy, but good food. Called DOW and may have something I can live with, all depends if my Son or a friend can go also. Thanks for the information. I;m going to write a note I received from my Dealer today in the next box, read if you will.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMHThanks. Get on the CO website or call DOW for info. There are over the counter elk tags in the Craig area and even several hundred deer tags available when the leftovers go on sale.Yeah, at a shade over $800, deer and elk tags are steep in CO. $643 in MT ain't cheap either! To budget, I buy the deer in the April draw purchase and elk in August leftover sale. Since we have to make motel deposits and ranch fees early, I buy the cheaper tag early and the other one later. From my experience, I am more likely to tag deer and elk the same week in NW Co than in MT. I can usually only stretch a week and a half to travel/hunt, so the 5 week MT season doesn't help me in that regard. Since I'm not retired yet, I don't have unlimited time off. I usually don't hunt my home state of WA if I go to CO. Seasons too close together.What was the name of the cafe you talked about? The TIn Cup and Bad To The Bone have the best grub in Craig that I have found. The Backwoods Cafe on W. Victory Way has a good breakfast, but their dinners weren't all that great as I recall. I have never had less than an excellent meal at Bad to the Bone (on Breeze Street just a couple of blocks north of Victory Way / U.S. 40). I want to go back to the Old West Steakhouse in Steamboat this year. Mighty fine!Shoot straight!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

The R. party "was" our last hope of saving this great nation. Now there is nothing left but a bunch of socialist sympathizers on their side! Time to join the Constitution party! All of you out there who are going to vote for JM had better think again.............. All you're going to do is continue to justify the move of the R. party to the left even farther! Bush himself has done more damage to the R. party's principles in the last seven years than anyone else and the left still hates him!!!!!!!!! Think about it!!! It will never be enough for the left until this country is totally socialist! And because of spineless leaders like Bush, we are already well over half way there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gary in MN wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Some people have indicated that they are voting for Obama so their kids wont have to go to Iraq. True if you vote for Obama don't worry about the kids going to Iraq. The war will come to the U.S. Our young men and women are doing a great job over there. No one wants to go to war but freedom isn;t free.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

DP will probably have a comment about this tomorrow morning, but to those of you who think it's a good idea to elect a liberal Democrat, I would direct you to today's SCOTUS decision re the prisoners at Gitmo. NOW do you understand why one of, if not THE, most important decisions the POTUS makes are the judges he nominates for the SC? I don't know whether to laugh or cry. The absurdity of it boggles my mind.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Hunter: Thanks for the Info, will call DOW in C0 in the Am get some information. If bychance you pass thru Craig, C0 be sure and take a little time and look at the Western Museum they got. It realy is interesting. A little of everthing WESTERN and many firearms. I have been to see it 3 times and if go back will see it again. THere is a old fashion resturn near it that serves great food at reasonable prices. After a few days of beans and franks, its a treat to eat there. Wish was goign with you as love teh NW sections of C0 al the way to the Utah border. We hunter north of Craig on Black Mtn and Maybell in western Co.We also hunted below Steamboat springs and Hayden and Rifle.About 65 miles South of Steamboat is where I killed my first Elk. Good luck, don;t kill all the game, as I will apply again next year if living. Those maybe next year are coming to fast, at 73 not many left. About l0 yrs ago,C0 set aside X# of disable permits, but now they stopped I'm told.I never dreamed i would not draw Colorado or MT. Had been bugging the maps to see what routes I would take from Co to MT. MT's season last for 5 weeks, where in Co about 5-7 days now. The found a way to make lots of$$ by dividing up the season into 4 shorter seasons.. In MT you can hunt for the full 5 weeks every day or till kill your animal, plus fish, bird hunt, etc.Cost of Elk and Deer tags are $643.00 this year. A tad cheapr than C0. O well, if you have a good time and enjoy the hunt that's all that matters, killing a animal is a bonus. Too bad I'm to old( and very poor health) to move, or I would be living out West some place, as always wanted to be a Cowboy, ride horses, round up cattle and hunt all I had time to hunt. Life is un-predectable, just play the cards dealt and hope for the best.So, this year will hunt w-tails( did get 2 nice Bucks last yr.) here for our 5 week season and maybe a few days in SE VA. Shoot-um-straight and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Jim in M0: I just rechecked the name stampd on top of the bbl. It says: The Imperial. No other names anywhere. Yes It was my gransfathers, whom my Mother now(92) acquired when they devided his estate about 20 ys ago. She is very sick now and is giving away some of her stuff, and she gave me her Dad's shotgun. I would like to restore if possible. It has a bolt thru the action with a thumb lever that you tighten up as far as will go, the in the action is a grove for that lever to lay in????? quite Odd , never saw one like it before.I plan to take to my Gunsmith for a look see and get his opinion if I should keep as is or restore. Stock has a chip broken off at the forend and a little crack in the forarm. It really needs a good sanding, buffing and reblueing after the wood work is worked on. It is kinda unusual, as had many SS shotguns, but never one like this one. I love odd ball stuff to begin with, kinda goes with my attitude at times.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from semp wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Ahhh ... Where's Pat Paulson when we need him? Pat Paulson and Professor Irwin Corey ... there's ticket . Washington is so screwed we may as well laugh ourselves into a coma.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

Jim in MOI also have the Fjestad Blue Book of Gun Values. It is a fine reference, but not infallible. While most of the information is accurate, it is not complete. For example, it does not show a Savage 110 ever being chambered in .257 Roberts in the synthetic stock and I personally owned one NIB.So RMH's old shotgun could be most anything, particularly if made in small numbers overseas. I have a .410 side by side made in Brazil that is not listed either. It was my late father-in-law's so I have no idea where it came from. It's not too old, but with no serial number, it must be pre-68?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMHMany units in NW Colorado around Craig have leftover deer licenses after the draw. I believe they go on sale August 12th after the second draw for those who applied and did not get one of their first application choices. I'm not sure exactly how that second draw works, as I have always drawn in the first draw. We drew deer licenses this year (results just posted).If you look at the online regs and info, you will see that the deer tags were cut in many areas, including the one we hunt in. They were reduced to about the number of those applied for in previos years. I think the Gunnison Basin was hit particularly hard this winter, but there are other areas not hit so hard. Can't have been too bad in NW CO or the tags would have been cut more.Get online and be ready to look at the Leftover List when they go on sale. That list is updated at least hourly online after they go online. I buy my elk tags that way usually, since I don't fork out the cash for both licenses in April. I usually apply for the deer in the draw, but the elk is available over the counter for the areas we hunt. Also, Idaho and Washington have over the counter deer tags, although Washington is not a good bet for success for an out of stater unless he has the inside scoop on good hunting spots. I could share some good public land hunting info if you decide to hunt in NE Washington. I have not hunted Idaho, but I do pretty well on deer in NE Washington when I hunt there.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

RMH,Are you sure the shotgun is an Imperial? I tried to look it up in new Fjestad book and so far all I could find is its manufacture date of '92-95 in Surrey,Great Britain. No collector value, just market.But this doesn't make sense , at your age how could your grandpa give you this gun and it be worn?Take a close look at the barrel stampings.Also, this book is almost 2200 pages and I haven't figured it out yet so I'll look some more tomorrow.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

I hope this dialog soon ends and we get back to our favorit subject: Guns and Hunting. That is 2 subjects we all appear to agree on to some extent. We can Bitch and Moan till Nov. and little will it help. The Dye has been cast, and we got 2 choices, litle and none. So best we all begin to let sleeping dogs lie till Nov. Thank godness, Deer season opens prior to then in some areas, and if able I plan to forget politics till Nov. We all learned ( I did) something when we were talking guns.ammo. hunting, etc. Now we all just bull-shitting something we can not change. Tell me a state out West that has Mule Deer tags over the counter, if there are any? Any you guys heard of a shotgun by name of Imperial in 12 ga, single BBL. I was just given my Grandfathers and it needs lots of work if worth anything. Don;t mind spending a little to make it shootable if the value is there.Any help appreciated. You guys looking for a new rifle, best you check out the MArlin XL7 it is a jewel and price is afforable to most any hunter.Shoot-un-straight and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 49 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter:Thank you. I couldn't have said it any better. Bush has been a disappoint for me as well, other than his SCOTUS appointments. And as for GW .vs. Gore & Kerry: it was a "no brainer".

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve S.I agree with your observation that we should be electing leaders. Obama does not quite fit that bill for me. Don't rail on about Bush. He is not running for reelection. He has disappointed me also. But I certainly don't regret voting for him over Gore and Kerry.I don't want an African-American, an Italian American, an Anglo American, or whatever to lead this country, I WANT AN AMERICAN to lead! Obama is a left-wing elitist manufactured by the DNC (led by wacko Howard Dean) who lacks the experience and fundamental values this country was founded upon.That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Speech Writer wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"Tomorrow you're all going to wake up in a brave new world, a world where the Constitution gets trampled by an army of terrorist clones, created in a stem-cell research lab run by homosexual doctors who sterilize their instruments over burning American flags. Where tax-and-spend Democrats take all your hard-earned money and use it to buy electric cars for National Public Radio, and teach evolution to illegal immigrants. Oh, and everybody's high!"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Speech Writer wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"You know what really gets me? Democrats didn't even win this thing, the Republicans lost it. They ran away from George Bush. "Hey, the ship's in trouble, quick, let's drown the captain!" We were this close to Jesus coming back. And you Republicans that turned your back on the president are going to wander in the desert for the next two years. Literally, someone's going to have to replace those troops in Iraq!"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Speech Writer wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

McCain's concession speech: "The people have spoken - and apparently they're tired of freedom. Don't get me wrong, I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed. I thought this country would last longer than 230 years. That's it, folks, America is over. At this point, we might as well just give it back to the goddamn Indians. Let's see how they'd deal with foreign enemies bent on their destruction. Here's your cake, terrorists!"

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Dr. Ralph, thanks for under standing my position on names. When I grew up we had seperate schools and the Blacks did also.And they were called the N word. Don;t know or ever cared where Africian American came from. As all the real Africians have long been dead. This new generations of B's were born here in the USA, so get off the kick of Africian American, and call a Spade a Spade. AS to some above. I too worked l00 hrs a week for l8 years, decided that jobs were availabele at 40 hrs a week. So I changed jobs. Had to retire in 90 due to years service age and health problems from the Banking Industry. Invested all my retirement in CD's around 8% in 92 and it made up the difference in SS and and my dividends from my retirement. Now for the past 7 years the rate gone from 8 % to a tad over 3%. Yes I blame W for part of it, as his interest has been only for the wealthy. All his lies about the Iraq war, were just that, LIES. Then in 2004, he scared the religious people into re-electing him as he instilled in their mind that if he was not re-elected the war would be here and not in Iraq. Do agree that Al Gore and Terry were loosers from the onset. The Dem. party could have chosen anyone and bet those two idiots. Now, we gonna be hung with one of the 2 running and it scares me to even think one of them will be pres. I'm too old and not enough knowledge or $$$ to help establish a 3rd party, but this county needs to do so ASAP. But, long time till Nov. anything can /may happen to change whom we vote for.So many Idiots on the loose, a planned elimation could change this Nov.elections. Recall Kennedy and King????+ Lincoln. Hope soon we get back to what this blog is for, sure not on guns and hunting anymore.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Wa Mnthunter,I agree with you more than you know. But, 'you can't fix stupid'.I've erased so many posts to girlieman an Steve somebody manlyier than me save me in times of trouble, because I lose control, and start to say things to these guys who have hands softer than they should be, that I shouldn't.What happened to the gene pool?P.S.Can't imagine BO's military chief of staff would be, Ellan De.?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve, I haven't seen many leaders on the ballot lately... seems like big money rules and the country suffers accordingly.If you think Obama is a leader explain to me where we are being led. I can assure you it will not be the direction I would like to see this country go.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter-I just find it funny how easily people are distracted by what really matters. Does how someone salutes during the pledge really matter when New Orleans is hit with another Hurricane?I'm guessing W has really nice form when he salutes, but look how well he handled that fiasco.We need to stop electing politicians, and start electing LEADERS....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve S.I suppose the rantings of his spiritual mentor were taken out of context, too? I think not.Let me put it this way: If a person goes to a church and doesn't heartily agree with what comes out of the pulpit, how long does he remain in attendance? Not long. Having years of experience in that subject, I contend that folks change churches, split churches, quit going, change religions, or something other than stick around for status quo if they don't LIKE what they hear. Much less be married by some dude you don't agree with and let him baptise your kids? Gimme a break.I agree. FOX is just as guilty as the rest of the drive-by media in using sound bites to play any story to their satisfaction.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I haven't read the books. I didn't say that I had. Thats why I asked to see them in full context.I'm simply saying that to take a sentence here, and a sentence there, it's pretty easy to make something work to your advantage.Just watch FOX news for 10 minutes and you'll see what I'm talking about.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

GmanMerriam-Webster defines: scoundrel - a disreputable personYour response might be applicable to some scoundrels, but rest assured that if one is not patriotic to this great nation who has provided great measures of liberty through the sacrifice of many, he is indeed a scoundrel in my book.A person is as disreputable as the scoundrels he hangs out with. Ask your Mama about that!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Because patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Steve S:Have you read the books?If so, enlighten us.If not, say so.Obama is not the nominee of half the registered voters. He is not quite the possessor of half the Democrat party primary popular votes, so I fail to see how that is half of anything.As far as fear goes, it will take more than a pip squeak like Obama to bring down this country. I personally would like to avoid the mess to clean up later.Gman, maybe you smoked a little too much in your younger days. It dulls the senses and motivation....permanently.I don't mind if Obama doesn't wear the flag on his lapel. I don't, myself. But I have not seen a satisfactory explanation as to why he fails to properly salute (as a civilian) the flag during the national anthem. So perhaps one of you Obama supporters could explain why it is ok to have an un-patriotic ingrate for President.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve S wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter-Those quotes are all cherry picked just to prove your point. Lets see them in the full context of the paragraph / chapter.Taken out of context, its pretty easy to rip apart anyone.Its just blatant fear mongering....

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

What makes so many of you so scared like old women?Can you not face the problems of contemporary society without turning the presidential nominee of half the enrolled voters in this nation into a Brooks Brothers-dressed jihadi?I gave up marijuana 20 years ago, but would like to know what you guys are on, because it seems to provide a great escape.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

In Obama's own words (Very, very Scary)This guy wants to be our President and control our government.Pay close attention to the last comment!! Below are a few lines from Obama's books. These are passages in his own words:From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'From Dreams of My Father: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on , to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my fathe r's image,the black man, son of Africa, that I had packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'And here's the clincher: (grab on to something when you read this:)From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'_____________________________________Is anyone paying attention out there??????? Does that mean if elected President he would hand us over to the Muslims????????And it's in PRINT AND IN HIS OWN WORDS!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

RMHI hear you, man. you make excellent points. I don't necessarily agree with everything you said about the economics of the past 10 years, but if you have been impacted negatively your perspective is real.I felt the same way the last several Presidential elections. John Kerry or Al Gore or Bush? Clinton or Dole? Obama or McCain?What choices! To me, Obama is clearly the most radical, liberal, Marxist candidate to sh!t between shoe leather. Apparently there are enough idiots in this country who are charmed by his B.S. to get him nominated. I think your restraint in not using the N word is admirable.Dr Ralph:Everytime I hear that SOB Wright utter his damnation upon America, I hope someone ignites about 59 grains of IMR 4350 and sends him a little something. The only person I have more disdain for is the murderous Osama bin Laden!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Thomas wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

DR. Ralph,Growing up in a largely U.A.W. City and State one would think that I would follow in my father's footsteps and Vote Democratic. But that is not the case. I learned from a early age to listen to what people are saying and not just listen for what I want to hear. I think I have voted mixed ballots more times then not when it comes to the General Elections.There are both Republicans and Democrats that I have liked in all the races. I simply vote for who I feel will do the better job.If you really want to make waves suggest that the President and Vice President should be separate elections and not a team vote. What I mean is instead of every one running for president at the same time have some one running for the VP position too. When Duncan Hunter, and Ruddy, and Romney dropped out they should have reentered to run for VP.I would love to see the look at Horror on Hillary's face when she would have to run against Gore, Edwards, and the other Democrats which have already had a head start. But then again she would have been camplaining for all these months. Come to think about it you really don't get to hear much about what the VP does behind the scenes.Tom the Troll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Thomas wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

The Way I see it, if GMan wants to work a 20 hour week he is entitled to do so. His success or failure depends on him alone. Not the Federal Gov and certainly not the State or Local Gov. As far as I know he could be a brain surgeon and charge $10,000 per hour to operate. I don't know, and I really do not care how he supports him self. Actually I do care. I do not want to see him homeless and out on the street begging for food and money. But I suspect that is not the case and that GMan has his financial situation well under control. Hell I would love to work a 20 hour week my self. But I know that I can't do that because I have obligations to my family to provide for them.Tom the Troll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

RMH, you didn't change views, your political party did. Unfortunately, I can say the same thing about mine. The real question is how do we break the system and actually convince people to get interested enough to not vote for who their parents did? The media has beat it into our brains that a third party candidate is not viable. I voted for Ron Paul a few months ago and Ross Perot a few years ago. The great unwashed masses are becoming the great brainwashed masses... punch my name to listen to the man who performed Obama's marriage ceremony curse America, if you can stand the pain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I made more $$ and did more hunting, buying guns(which this Blog is suppose to be about) during the 92-2000 period. My retirement fund was earning 8%. Under Little Britches Bushie it is now earning 3.85% I don;t know where you worked, but most of the lost jobs occured in the past 7 yrs. Being disabled, I am unable to work a second job at Arbby's or Wendy's or Wal-mart as a GREETER. Regardless of what takes place in NOV. we will never get out of this hole Bush left us in. And yes, I said "Coon" Huh, could have used the N word but thats against the law. But it's ok to be called "WHITTE". Neither party choose the qualified person to be on the Ticket. in Nov. so we hung with 2 guys that know nothing of business and working class people. Now to all you who blasted me a few weeks ago when I mentioned Politics, why are you now so interested in what I tried to state. Best we get back to GUNS?HUNTIN, we begging to sound like Chris MAtthews. If you want to blame anyone,blame those of you who voted for the 2 in psition to take over the WH Come Jan.20.Most chose the wrong person in both parties. Better yet, with the popular vote and the delegates( who in the H--- is the Super Delegates?) not counting, just let the Supreme Court elect the next pres as they did in 2000. Hopefully the next VP with have guts to lead this country, as for sure the 2 running for Prs. have no guts period. Enough about MCCain/Obama, both loosers. Best we forget them now and later. A long time till Nov. anything can happen.Remember the Dewey/Truman election? if not read up on it, The New York Times ate a lot of paper the folling day. Rather than us BITCH, should start a 3rd party. Good hunting,if can afford the gas and related expenses. Will see many Western Hunters hunt their home state or at least one near by.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

GoldenArrow,Nobodys gonna confiscate your car. Pay attention to recent history lessons of the world.The lib. dems. have been spouting that jargon for years.I hear Ted K's out of the hospital, is that you?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Yooper Jack,You are so right about the media defending BO. When he spoke of 58 states, one outlet immediately pointed out that there are 58 Muslim states (or countries) so that was where his mind must have been.That sounds like the worst excuse of all!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alamo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Well GA you can't be that stupid.Show me where the Constitution recognizes your right to drive a car and the part of the Second Amendment that refers to "sporting guns" and you may have a point.Does your post pass for logic where you comes from?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Well GA you can't be that stupid.Show me where the Constitution recognizes your right to drive a car and the part of the Second Amendment that refers to "sporting guns" and you may have a point.Does your post pass for logic where you comes from?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Reeder wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Yooper Jack,Don't get me wrong. For the record, I can't stand Hillary Clinton and under almost any circumstance would never want to see her in office. Circumstances this year gave me pause, not because of any misconceptions about who she is and what she stands for but simply because I believe she would have been a safer alternative to Obama on national security, and because I feared the long-term damage caused by a McCain Presidency would be worse, given the influence he would have over the GOP in its role as the loyal opposition. I will admit part of my antipathy to McCain is personal -- having met him and dealt with him on a couple of occasions, and knowing others who have done so more often, I know him to be a royal jerk, which has nothing to do with left or right. I could easily overlook my personal feelings, though, if it weren't for his positions on a whole range of issues, particularly over the last eight years, which make him in many instances indistinguishable from Hillary about half the time. Given a choice between McCain and Obama, however, there is no choice; not when you consider Obama's radical associations, overtly socialist economics (what can you say about a guy who admits raising capital gains taxes would REDUCE gvt. revenue but wants to do it anyway?)and dangerously naive and pacifistic foreign policy proposals.As for Gman, it seems to me that someone who's been able to cut his work week in half while doubling his salary has done pretty well under W. I congratulate you on your success, which I wish I could duplicate. Unlike some people, though, I don't think you owe me a share of your income out of "fairness," and I have no desire to hold you up to scorn because you had the audacity to succeed.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from GoldenArrow wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I have never seen so many bitter people clinging to their guns. Nobody is going to be taxed 85%! Nobody is after sporting guns. Remember you have to be registered to own a car, why not to own a gun? I am a member of the NRA too!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

RMH says most of us made more money between 1992 and 2000 than since?? What planet was he on!? The slick willy regime's continuous attack on the pharmaceutical industry for whom I worked ended up costing me my job (along with countless other people) and with it went my adequate salary; I was left to find something which wasn't paying adequately. Only in the last couple of years have I regained the earnings I had. Probably never be able to catch my retirement savings up to where it should be!I may not be the brightest light to shine on the ole Christmas tree but I am smart enough to know where my bread is going to be buttered! I am voting for McCain!SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder:We have a SCOTUS decision coming up very soon in the Heller case. I'm fairly confident that this ruling will be favorable. Had Hillary appointed the last two SCOTUS Justices, I wouldn't be so confident. I think you feel sorry for her because she cried!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alamo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I hadn't seen the offending comment. Agreed- Not appropriate, and totally unnecessary. This can and should be a simple debate between wildly divergent visions of what this country is all about.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Black Rifle Addict wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

HRC, or Obama, are two terrible choices for president, but all the candidates are running a campaign based on health care, stop the Irag war, and stop the "business as usual" in Washington DC. Let's see how long it takes for any of them to get these issues taken care of first before taking on the gun rights fight!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I could give a rat's a$$ about the drivel BHO spews. I'm not voting for anybody named Hussein, Mohammed, or Adbul. Period!To the imbecile using Col T. Whelen as a tag: Get creative or put your own handle on here. Thata is about like using Mick Jagger or Richard Nixon. Get a grip.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman:I probably would've been offended also, had he been talking about any other black person. This one, however, is running on that issue, and that issue, alone. He was asked "do you intend to campaign in every state"? His response "I've been in 57 of them and have got one more to go". No one in MSM picked up on it!I guess my point is that this man is, at best, a mental midget, at worst, a moron.It kind of reminds me of a story, a long time ago, where a tailor wovea magic suit for the emperor. It was invisible to people who were unwise. It took a little boy to point out that the emperor had no clothes.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Hey, Alamo!Good to hear from you. I wasn't bragging about my 20-hour work week. I was mentioning that I, as a small business owner (the type of person for whom the GOP putatively offers representation, but doesn't), am able to set a fee schedule reflecting my expertise and experience that allows us to pay our bills and raise our son without resorting to daycare; family values are very important even to pinkos like me. At the present time, that is what fits my family's scheduling needs. I would think that the rugged individualists on this board would applaud a fellow sportsman who is able to strike his own course without relying on others to supply him with a stream of tasks.As for healthcare, I thought we had agreed to disagree on this. Yes, I believe that a civilized society should offer basic services to its citizens. And at this point, the current US system is hurting American businesses more than I can explain in a short time, because our global competitors offer state-paid insurance. Believe me or not.All I'm trying to do here is inculcate a sense of principled debate instead of outright racism and demonization of those whose theories of government don't fit in with the prevailing sentiment in Dave's little corner store. Am I just stirring things up? Maybe, but I just can't let a guy call somebody a coon and not call him on it. So call me a bad American and take away my Gadsden flag.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alamo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I love it Gman!Boast about your twenty hour work week at the same time you've advocated governemnt subsidized (or provided) health care. Nice.Other than accurate observations that Obama is an empty suit with dangerous ideas completely antithetical to the principles that made this country what it is, I don't see that He is generating much "thinking". In fact it is comical how the majority of Obama's supporters are NOT relying on cognition to explain their devotion.Vapid concepts like hope and change instead of intellectual examination of policy proposals are driving this candidacy.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

When I said I worked a 20-hr week, I forgot to mention I don't have an employer to exploit. I'm a one-man shop, an entrepreneur, a small business owner.As such, I keep close watch on the policies that affect me such as healthcare policy, the gyrations in the financial markets that lead to a weaker dollar and higher oil prices, and the mess that is property tax and public school funding.I'm not doctrinaire one way or the other. But the GOP hasn't offered anything of substance to me to bring things back into balance. Just my opinion. I do laud what Treasury and the Fed did in the Bears Stearns collapse, but that was the exact opposite of the free market sermon I've heard from the GOP and its followers since Jan '81.If Sen Obama can get more people thinking, for good or ill, that is far better than an administration that has built a culture of fear to govern; the vast majority of posts on this board exemplify how successful that strategy has been.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Does anybody think experience counts for anything? Here we have a guy who hasn't finished his second term in office, running for pres and he's seriously considering Claire McCaskill D Mo., who hasn't finished her first term in office for VP.Hell you may as well just write in some fruit cake from hollywood for pres. Maybe Tom Cruise and Whoopy Goldberg. They talk like they know it all too. Motto: Never been there never done that.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Col. T. Whelen:At no time during the writing of the U.S. Constitution, did the Founding Fathers address the rights of Islamic Terrorists, who would destroy America and her people.I'm glad that you care for the rights of these "oppressed" people. I just wish that you cared as much for the nearly 3,000 who died on 9/11/01.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Reeder wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman,My apologies. I forgot that most Democrats don't really have a big problem with being identified as socialists anymore, which is fine with me, since I'm always in favor of truth in advertising. I like the idea of a 20-hour work week and a minimum guaranteed salary, too, but why stop there? Why not make it a one-hour work week? I also think I'll take a million bucks minimum. Why not? It's not like people really earn their money through hard work, inventiveness or the production of useful products and services. As we all know, the guy who gets ahead only does it by exploiting those less willing or able to work hard, and there's no way a free market can possibly allocate resources as efficiently or fairly as bureaucrats and Harvard-educated politicians.As for the chaff produced by the RNC, I can tell you that we were subject to legal fact checkers who did not let a word leave our press shop if it were not 100-percent, verifiably true, which put us at something of a disadvantage against the Clinton administration, some of whose members openly gloated to the Washington press corp that they had studied and borrowed from Hitler's big-lie propaganda techniques -- and no, I'm not making that one up either. They were actually proud of themselves. I can also say that I never worked in a press room in a regular media setting which went to as much trouble to verify its facts as we did in the communications dept. of the RNC. Certainly, I think our information was more trustworthy than say, Chris Mathews at MSNBC, who admits to feeling a "tingle up his leg" every time Obama speaks. Anyone who wants to know the facts about Obama better look them up themselves, because the mainstream media is head over heels in love and is going to do nothing but lay down rose petals for the annointed one from this moment on.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder:I guess I'm a real oddball! I've supported Sen. McCain from the start. I've also felt that he was most able to fight the war on terror. Also, I like his position on 2A and abortion. He's the first candidate that I've supported monetarily.Gman:I can't help but thinking, that people living near NYC, aren't concerned about the possibility of another attack. When the subject of anti-terror arises, the first and most important cite is, the loss of civil liberties and spying. What evidence is there, that the gov't is spying on you and I? I expect any calls I make to the Middle East will be monitored, and as such, I'll try to refrain from talking to Islamic Terrorists.Mr.BSorry for the late response. I've been sans internet for the weekend. I'd rather go without tobacco! GWB ran for President with a decent (I guess) record as two-term Governor of Texas. His record couldn't be attacked because it wasn't. BHO is running for President. His record is, at best, meager! He has voted "Present" 130 times. 130 times, he couldn't take a stand! He's told me I won't have gas for my truck! He's said I won't be able to heat my home! He's told me I might go hungry! He thinks the War on Terror is phony! If you're confident with that, go ahead and vote for him. Keep this in mind; The only thing going for him is the color of his skin. With their intelligence, without Affirmative Action, he would probably be the happy man at WallyWorld, and Michelle would be the cleaning lady at Holiday Inn.RMH:I'll excuse your Freudian Slip! I might have thought something similar! Actually, I've done much better under GWB than WJC. Even with the gas prices, its easier to buy gas than to try to find work when its not there!Please keep in mind, a vote for Barack Hussein Obama is a vote for more American soldiers AND civilans to die!YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Laos_07 wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

So let me get this straight. Our gun loving Repubs wanted to pass a law allowing the government the right to confiscated guns in the event of an emergency such as hurricane Katrina and Obama voted against it.To tell the truth I'm not so much worried about someone asking me to register a firearm with my local police chief. Who by the way is a great guy. But when the stuff hits the fan it's my 12 gage I want close at hand, not confiscated by some government."'The gun vote matters,' says Ray Schoenke, founding president of the American Hunters and Shooters Association. And in Pennsylvania, he says, gun owners who follow key Washington legislation aimed at limiting ownership are moving in Obama's direction because of his support of past legislation to prohibit the use of federal money to confiscate weapons during a disaster like Hurricane Katrina. It's the only major difference on gun positions between Obama and Clinton, according to gun advocates, but it's enough for groups like Schoenke's to give the Illinois senator a passing grade."

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from VATXHUNTER wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Ding Dong the Witch is dead witch old witch the Biliary Witch

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Call it what-ever you like, but a Spade is a Spade. Color does have it's effect on our lives. Wait till after JAn.20 and you will find out for yourself. I can;t understand either party this round, neither voted for the guys who could have made a difference in our lives. Now you can bet your last $ that you will look back and as WHY. Like him or hate him, but most of us made more $$$$ from 92-2000 than any other time in our lives. What we gained in those years has been lost in the past 7+ yrs. The mexicans are growing like rabbits, and already passed the blacks in the US. Soon the white race will be lost to the two above. Blame ourselves. When did Super Delegats get priority over plain old state Delagets? No point in a popular vote anymore, just let the heads of state choose whom-ever. Or the Supreme will overide them. Like is a mixture now, and afraid no improvements in store for most of us. I pray my Grandkids can cope with the mess.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

My political views have nothing to do with what I have or have not done in the past. Maybe my views have changed because of what I took part in. Maybe not.I'd love a shorter work week, but I don't think my employer should take the hit for it. So who should? The tax payers? That seems to be the lib. dems. answer. Of course, the hard working blue/white collar man will be the one's to pay for it.And the rest will keep their hand outstretched for us to fill.That nonsense must stop.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder, my point is that it is not a crime to be avowedly socialist. I have no trouble with the resolution of the dialectic.I, too, was born in the 50s, and spent 10 years at dailies before chucking it for some fairly complex policy journalism. All straight journo; I don't have it in me to turn spin doctor. So don't lecture me about fact-checking if you spent any time releasing chaff from the RNC.I'm all for a shorter work week. I work 20 hrs a week and make 2X what I did working 50-60 for the rags. What's wrong with that?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from PbHead wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

A few observations:If you do not like the current candidates, I hope you at least gave $200 to one you did like.I remember when "BO" was a bad thing.Come November, those leftover campaign signs make dandy targets. Volunteer to pick them up.Let's start Monday off by sending a few rounds downrange. Have a good week end.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Thomas wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Reeder,Hillary is not done camplaining yet. She still have a $20,000,000.00 debt to pay off. Apparently camplaining is more expensive then she thought and is too dumb to bail out of a sinking ship when it is still afloat. She says that she is now supporting BHO but I don't belive it. I think she will find some way to publicly embarrass BHO and will steal the nomination from him. I think she still has a few tricks up her sleeves that have not see the light of day yet. She probably figured that she could not get enough delegates to win outright so she will try to bump him off and out of the ticket.But that is just my personal opinion and I have no facts to back them up.Tom the Toll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Well it had to happen. The first black presidential candidate that actually can win and only 143 years after Lincoln's "better angels" put a bullet in the back of his head... as a Yankee living in the south I have much experience with predjudice, all of it bad. Fortunately all I had to do was talk slower and less grammatically correct to fit in.The problem with Obama as I see it is not his color but his character. He is rated 100% by the NARAL or pro-death errrr... I mean pro-choice lobby and 0% by the NRLC or pro-life lobby. He is a strong supporter of affirmative action which in and of itself is racist. Syrian realator Antoin Rezko is under federal indictment for favor trading and fraud and was one of Obama's first supporters and has given him over a million dollars. Factcheck.org rates him the most liberal man in the Senate. We don't even need to discuss his preacher who he just figured out was a nut case after twenty years. You won't hear any of this on the big three networks. Why? The Leftist Machine needs to lie and dumb down America to keep in power. That and all the money we earn to give away to those who refuse to work but love to vote for Dumbocrats...By the way, about the only element more fringe than gun nuts are left wing gun nuts.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

So much for the better angels of our nature. Abject apologies, Mr. Lincoln.Between Mr. Reeder's amusing retreat to 50's-style propagandizing (I love the phrase "avowed socialists") to Rocky Mtn Hunter's essay that would have made pre-63 George Wallace tear up with pride, I can't say that I've ever seen such out-and-out horse poop in a public forum that wasn't sponsored by fringe elements.I thought the US was the great experiment, the free market place of ideas; at least, that's what Chuck Colson told me. And Chuck should know. If avowed socialists get the majority of people to agree with them on an issue and it passes the ballot, so be it.But adopting such an attitude would empty the coffers of the Right's Machine, which needs fear in large amounts to survive. Make out that check today, gentlemen! The Negroes and Commies are at the gate! They want your guns and your daughters! Remember the Alamo! Remember the Maine! Remember Pearl Harbor!Been there. Seen it. It's all horsepoop.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Ok guys click and read this by Thomas Sowell. A black man that is not voting for Obama. Has anyone looked into the possibility of cloning Ronald Reagan?http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/tsowell/2008/ts_06051.shtml

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

He said it, but others of you were thinking it! (or worse)Now weren't you?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

He said it, but others of you were thinking it! (or worse)Now weren't you?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Col. T. Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

James T., I just had a .416 Hoffman built for a trip to Tanzania next year, yeah you're probably right, I don't know much about guns. Do you know what Writ of Habeus Corpus means? Look it up, and look up suspension of same my friend.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Huh? wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Rocky Mtn Hunter, did you call Obama a "coon"?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Townsend Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Silvertip, your government is the biggest bureaucracy the world has ever known. Watch the Frontline special, read "Cobra II", "Fiasco", or "Hubris". The terrorist boogie man will end your 2nd amendment rights quicker than you can blink.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Silvertip:It was Thomas Jefferson who said, "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have." -- including all of your rights - the first step is to take away your right to own a firearm.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rocky Mtn Hunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I thought this was a gun, hunting Blog. Some weeks back I mentioned Politics as was raked over the coals by many on this BLOG. What hapened to change your minds.Same people voicing their complaints now. As for Clinton, I will take her any day over Obama. Yes, he's a smooth Coon, not as smooth as he will be come Nov. HIs wife is a pure breed A.American. Were all the A. Americans born in the US from day one? NO. they were shipped here by the tribal chiefs in Africa who wanted to trade the misfits for Europene mdse. AS for Obama's wife, she hates the USA. The way Obama got in all the better Colleges was due to his color and colleges must have X# of Blacks to get Federal funds.He makes a good speech, because he says what people want to hear. He does not have the knowledge to be President of anything, other than maybe way down on the totum pole in Chicago. Say what you want about Hillary,she would be far better in the WH than the choices we got. Recall the past 7+ ys to the prevous 8 yrs, then ask your self, am I better off now than in l992? Only one answer a big NO I'm worse off, at least I am. All Politicians are about the same,say, do anything to get elected, as most are rich and the only thing left is POWER. Don;t worry about Hillary get the VP, as he will pick the Gov. of Alabama, whom he can control. He cannot control Hillary . I blame the Demo party for Obama getting the nod. The age groupe from l8 to 39 has been spoiled to death by their hard working parents or some social program and work and play with the blacks daily. So you better get use to saying Yessur Boss, whatever you say I will do what you tell me. Sue, Hillary will run in 2012, I hope to be here to see that, at 73,doubtful. McCain, blame the Reps for that, Huckabee should ahve gotten the job, not McCain.I appreciate the hardships McCAin went thru, but he is not Pres. material. Bush has left the USA in a Pile of S--- and I pity whom ever takes his place. You got 3 choices come Nov. McCain, Obama, or don;t vote, I will take the latter other than our local crap we got running. What has become of out Statesmen,whom we at one time look up to and respected.As for guns, I don;t think we got to worry about them, as too many other problems to occupy the elected Officials minds.I don;t understand why so many White Women voted for Obama. He did the same as John Edwards, E. Dole ( has she died) and Va.Fox and Burr did , courted N.C. got to Washington and begun running for Pres immediately. At one time I, l/2 way respected the Kennedys based on Pres.Kennedy,but after Ted and Carolina endorsed Obama, that respect went out the window. We best begin to look for a person to run for both parties in 2012, and start now and prepare that person for the WH. OK, enough about this royal mess, lets all get back to hunting and guns. At least we all know a Remington from a Winchester,Hopefully, and which end of the gun the bullet comes out of. Other than actual hunting with my guns, I enjoy reading hunting trips of other hunters. Just hope prices drop or at east stableize, especially gasoline and plane fares, so I can make another trip to the Rockies.I yet want a nice Mulie and a bigger Elk if one steps out. I always buy tags for both, just in case one of the other does step out for a good shot.Read lst night in a NAtional hunting Magazine,that we better find out wher our last Winchester ( model 70 and 94) werer made.If made in NH, better trade fast s they sorry piece of junk, as teh empolyees used ind=ferior material to clean house, as they knew the plant was clsing. Try to find out from the S# where your latest Winchester was Mfgered. The Blue Book of Gun Values may help.Ok, time to move out. Shoot straight and often. Forget what we can;t change,such as will take place in Nov.The old Gunslinger, who remembers the end of the deprssion years and the WW11 and now the last 7 yrs.Bring on the Horse and Buggy again, as gas continues to rise beyond reason. Maybe we all need to plant corn and make Ethonal or corn whiskey to buy gas.O, that sweet taste of Mash grain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Reeder wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I hate to admit it, but if Hillary had gotten the nomination I might have actually voted for her instead of McCain. That's from someone who spent every waking hour over a five year period at the RNC fighting the Clintons and almost everything they stand for. I flatly can't stand McCain, and my biggest concern about him becoming President is that he will defang the GOP as the only, occasionally useful vehicle for fending off collectivism and appeasement. Hillary on the other hand, while well left of center, is, like her husband, more of an opportunist than any committed ideologue, and would probably be a little safer on national security issues if for no other reason than inviting an attack or leaving chaos in Iraq would hurt her poll numbers. That's now moot, and despite my loathing for him in general, I will choke and gag and vote McCain, because Obama is not merely the most liberal member of the senate by voting record, but from everything I can tell about him a dangerous radical who can't seem to come up with a single friend or acquaintance who is not either a raving, leftwing lunatic or an actual terrorist. I don't know what else you can say about a candidate who works hand-in-glove with avowed socialists in Chicago to get elected to the state senate (you can check out archived stories on the DSA {socialist} website on that one), sups tea with terrorists like William Ayers and Bernadette Dohn, counts among his personal friends a mouthpiece for the PLO, and has won the endorsement of both Hamas and Fidel Castro. That's good enough for me. Throw in legislation he promoted in Illinois that would have shut down every single legal gunstore in the state and I'd vote for McCain if he were the devil incarnate -- and I'm not entirely convinced he's not.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Chuck wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Anyone who has listened to what B. HUSSEIN Obama really says cannot vote for him for intellectual reasons, but just cuz he makes you FEEL GOOD.He is for complete removal of your guns. He has said on many occasions he believes in the second amendment, for those that the GOVERNMENT approves to have guns. Guess what folks, that ain't us.Just look at his long time friends, Ayer, Wright, & Rezko, who BTW he now decides after 20 plus years of friendship they are not the people he knew and cared for.William Ayers admitted he built bombs for domestic terrorism, Do a search. B Hussein was following his lead when he got into politics. They were tight. Ayers is nothing but an urban terrorist who stated in his book, they didn't do enough with the bombings they did pull off.Then there was Tony Rezko. B Hussein "didn't know him that well" (When jack Abramoff was indicted the media tried to portray any Republican who ever talked to him as corrupt but they don't say a word about Rezko after B Hussein's one denial)And lest we forget Rev Jeremiah Wright that BHO could not separate himself from anymore than his grandmother. At least that was his story until he threw them both under the bus. BHO Quotes him in his book. If you read it it has no substance of what we wnt for America.The media kinda forgot these things. BHO is the media's Messiah. If he doesn't wanna talk about they roll over and accept it. They wouldn't do that if he was a republican.The only message BHO has is change. He will bring change all right. He has all the makings of being the last elected American president.What will he do when Imadamnnutjob from the theocratic people's republic of Hell, I mean Iran, begins to do what he(Nut Job) has promised to do. He( Nut Job) wants to wipe all of our infidel butts off the map, The US and Israel both. BHO does not have the stones to stand up to FOX, how is he going to to say NO to a crazy tyrant, Talk with him? Worked real well for Neville Chamberlain.No, if you want to vote for BHO, go ahead, just be aware America will never be the same againI'm not voting for McCain, I'm voting against Obama.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Eyeball, your right a third party canidate will throw a hamper into things, but its so needed. Are we the people so incompetent that its to mind boggling to have more than TWO parties, hell the elections in Iraq, the Iraqi people were able to vote for any of 100 parties. People vote because they want to be on the winning side. Obabma will win, I don't see anything happening differently, he's overwhemingly more popular (for NO reason at all) and a much better speaker, he's young, good lookin politician, the Dumb Masses (say that really fast) LOVE HIM for no other reason than he is a magnificent BS'er, the masses love rolling around in BS as much as pigs do! McCain gonna shoot himself in the foot, because the straight talk comes out kinda curvy some times, and people are goin to notice when he doesn't know the differnce between a Sunni and a Shitte and which group backs us and which is attacking. For those who are worried about the war on terror being lost, BHO said that he would not take a preemptive Nuclear Attack off the table when it comes to Iran, a country with a couple of bayliners afor a navy and NO standing army!!! The war in Iraq won't end on Obamas watch because he doesn't want the choas that will happen to be under his watch. The 2nd Amendment won't be ignored because of the Supreme Court rulings on the DC gun ban. So really there won't be any differnce between McCAin and Obama is what they might veto but if the Dems rule the Legislature than all Vetos can be over ridden with enough support, the Republicrats are between a rock and a hard place, because they left the Republican party behind, which is where most of us are still hanging out, wondering, what happened to the Republic?!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Laos - 65 wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I'm voting for the guy who has the stones to tell Israel to fight its own wars. After giving them 15 billion a year for decades, nuculer tech, the very best and latest planes, tanks and other arms, huge tax right-offs @ The World Bank and finally a truck load of neo-cons maskerading as American Patriots ----- enough is enough, I say, save us trillions and bury your own dead. ( this wont happen, but it should)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Eyeball,You are right on and I would add Carter was the worst of the bunch and he continues to be a scumbag.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

And Scott;A vote for Barr is a vote for Obama. By all means, vote for Barr, Scott; this is America and you have that right. But if Obama wins this by a million votes, and he does it bcause Barr pulled two million away from McCain, I only hope the thought that you voted RIGHT is enough to make you happy by the time B.O. Hussein is finished with this country.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Oh, Mr. b;If I knew then what I know now, I would STILL vote for W over Al Gore (look how he has conducted himself since 2000) or John Kerry. I absolutely think that neither of the men he beat would have done as well as W has. However clumsy he may be portrayed by the press, W has faced challenges (911, catastrophic hurricanes, energy prices going through the roof worldwide) that were unprecedented in their complexity (at least when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, you knew who your enemy was and where to find him). Despite W's best efforts to tip the scales, I say the worst presidents the US has had since WWII were Clinton, Carter, and LBJ. So yeah, Mr. b, I'll advise you who to vote for.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from eyeball wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I will be voting for McCain in November not because I am crazy about any one thing he says, but because he is infinitely better than Obama.Simple test. Who would the antigunners want us to vote for, if they could persuade us?Who would Al-quaeda and Hamas prefer to have in office?Whose box would Ahmenidjad have us ckeckmark this November?Can you imagine Kim Jong II asking us to vote for McCain?How about radical leftists of any stripe? Who would they like to see taking the Presidential oath this January?When in doubt, look who you're standing in line with.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

If Mr. Obomba tells the wold that he will not even consider to use a nuclear weapon I don't want him as president. Don't get me wrong I don't nuclear war. But I want a president that has the stones to take us to brinkmanship if he has too. With the climate in the middle east if some one pops a nuke off on US soil I want a president that will find out who did it and then level some Pakistani mountains.Tom the Troll

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from james t wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

t. whelenby being an obama supporter you are giving up both. if you want to push obama, fine. just don't try to dump your blind ignorant crap on the rest of us who have realistic worries about liberty and security. obama likes to look down on others and wants to make everyone a subject instead of an individual. he wants you to serve him and his U.S. hating wife. vote for him if you want. you probably don't even have a firearm.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Visitor wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

It's McCain gentlemen!He was for amnesty, but after millions (?) of letters, e-mails and phone calls, he stated that he was wrong, and would not support amnesty but support a tighter border and enforcement of laws against hiring illegal workers.He listens to the people. Isn't that what you all want?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Silvertip wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I remember reading years ago the following: "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got"Do you trust any of these people who want to be president?Silvertip

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Col. T Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Those who would give up liberty for security deserve neither.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gerald Keller wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

The surest way to put Obama in the White House is to cast your vote for the third party candidate.Remember what happened when H.Ross Perrot boosted Clinton there.If you really want to vote for Obama or McCain,then go to the polls and vote,but Don't waste your vote on someone who has no chance of ever winning a majority.I would have preferred Ron Paul.Maybe next time.I'll go with McCain this time,because the alternative scares me to death

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"...federal law prohibiting a gun store within 5 miles of a school...." What the hell would this do? I'm not worried about school children buying a gun near their school and commiting a crime, I'm more concerned about the drug addicts, illegal immigrants, etc. who buy guns off the street or trade drugs for them. When will the politicians wake up and realize that criminals do not walk into Cabela's or Gander Mountain, fill out a federal form, (that is supposed to eliminate criminals from acquiring firearms) and leave with a legally purchased gun? This is an example of Obama's idea of protecting Americans? Wake up! I may not agree with everything McCain says, but he is damn sure a better candidate than Phi Slama Obama.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Michael wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I think a few thoughts should be kept in mind from now until November. Obama grew up in the worst political climate in the US: the Chicago political machine. He is in no way to be trusted with any of our freedoms. Terrorism is not going to go away, nor is the hateful feelings most of the so called Islamic religious leaders have towards Americans. McCain served this country in the military and would be a better leader in times of danger to our overall freedoms. Obama is of the new breed of politician: interpret (change) the Constitution and Bill of Rights as you please. To A. Murphy and T. Whelan: peace and freedom is sometimes found only on the other side of war. The radical terrorists who hate the US and everything it stands for are at war with us whether you want it or not.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scott wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

McCain and Obama are both really TERRIBLE!!!!!! Obama for all the reasons stated above me. McCain is an Economic nightmare! He doesn't have a clue, the one thing Obama has on McCain is that yeah he'll raise your taxes to pay for the new stuff he'll add (which I DO NOT AGREE WITH WE NEED TO REPEAL THE 16th AMENDMENT!) where as McCain will cut some taxes BUT keep expanding the Federal GOvt. at the rate it is now. Also if you think McCain is a conservative because of the war and tax cuts (without spending cuts), your wrong. HIs views on immigration, the Firtst Amendment, his Second Amendment view isn't all that conservative, he "crosses the aisle" and thats just spineless, stand up for your ideas, if they are good ideals people will LISTEN. BlueOX is right when he said that the founding fathers are rolling in thier graves, hell they've probably augered themselves to china by now with all the spinning thier doin! John McCain has zero understanding of the Constitution, if he had an understanding he would stop saying how much of a better "Commander in Chief" he'd be. Does HE not understand that he's running to be President not the "Comander in Chief". Article 2 section. 2 says the President shall be Commander in Chief only when the we are at war. Now we may be occupying another country, but technically the Iraq war ended after we found Saddam in his rabbit hole. Also technically it was never a war but a conflict because the president acted on his own accord and Congress did not DECLARE war. Makeing it no different than Bosnia or Kuwait, or Somalia or any other soveriegn nation we wanted to intervene with.I"ll end now, by saying that if you want a real Conservative in the White House our best bet is to tell the Republicrats to go to hell and vote for the Libertarian Party Nominee Bob Barr, you know wasn't he the guy who led the Impeachment process on Bill Clinton. Read up on him you won't agree with everything but the stuff that you'll probably agree on are more important issues, and should take priority.All the yard signs for Obamab and McCain should replace the word President with the word Dictator, Obama wants to baby you, and McCain just really wants all the power to be in his hands(more than GWB already has) so he can wage wars for the 100, wait no 1000 years, and BANKRUPT US!!!!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

AT least he hasn't taken our guns.......but the cost to shoot them is going thru the roof.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

"Uniter, not a divider"? "Washington outsider"? "Mission accomplished"?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I find it hard to believe that people here, that elected "W", then re-elected him, would so readily offer advice on who NOT to elect! How could some be so arrogant?!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mr.b wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Refresh my memory yooperjack--what qualifications did "W" have?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jes wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Sorry, but the references don't go thru. Guess that's why I don't usually see any here! Too bad! Check out the first on Black Bear Blog and the second on Reuters.com

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jes wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

This is one of Obama's latest, and earlier:"As president, I'm gong to make sure we know if guns are being sold by unscrupulous gun dealers not abiding by existing laws." (if he knows they arn't abiding by existing laws, then why aren't they arrested?")In 1999, Mr. Obama urged enactment of a federal law prohibiting the operation of any gun store within five miles of a school or park. This would eliminate gun stores from almost the entire inhabited portion of the United States.As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he "never saw or approved the questionnaire," and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.Read: Obama On Second Amendment. Let The Communities Decideand:Obama's Latest on Gun ControlEnjoy your rights, while you still have them!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

If only the founding fathers could see the monster their creation has become. They're spinning in their graves already.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I’m willing to bet that Shrillary is staying in the race and demanding to be so close hoping something tragic like an assassination would happen to Obama and I really will not put it past the Clintons. Maybe the Clinton Witch Doctors and extraterrestrial friends lost their Joba’Doo?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from brian wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Combine the current economic situation with Bush's low approval rating and it will be difficult for McCain to win. Hopefully Obama will piss enough people off in the swing states between now and November to give McCain the job. I wonder if people relise how far off the founding fathers beliefs Obama is.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from SilverArrow wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

And from Barack Obama:"…I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right…" 4/16/08Can I get a big loud "HUH?" from everyone. At least Yogi Berra's malapropisms make some sense! This drivel just shows how little respect BHO has for the intelligence of the American electorate -- let's pray that he is wrong!DEP is right about the second best way to shut WHC up though (first is a chubby gal in a blue dress on her knees).SA

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from John Dean wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Amen gman!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Matt wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

F*** all of 'em, I'm voting Libertarian. And Obama won't run Hillary as his VP if he has a lick of sense. She will Grassy Knoll him as soon as he takes the oath of office.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Blue Ox wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I believe we're screwed no matter who gets into the oval office. I know it's kind of a crappy outlook, but I just don't know how else to see it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman,I think your just trying to stir us up.Is your surname Heavy by any chance?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Not only do most of you worry too much, you musta been sniffing the solvent again.If anybody got where they got because he was a "legacy," it's the current President. I'm sure Sen. McCain's family ties helped with Annapolis, too.Don't forget, Barack's Mom was a Caucasian lady from Kansas. You guys write about him like he's from Mars. And the way you rag on his tax proposals. Sweet creeping hominy! Have you ever thought about what happens when the Feds cut your tax bill? The state and local guys raise it because they ain't getting the Fed money anymore.If you were Pinkos, I'd offer to help y'all pack for Canada if he's elected.I mean it. I'm voting for Barack and going into the woods not long after, completely confident he'll do a fine job. Good golly, after what GWB has done to the Bill of Rights, you'd think you guys would give a man who ain't even elected yet the benefit of the doubt.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flipper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

National Public Radio did an all day salute to veterans today in honor of D-Day, it was inspiring! Might see if you can get the podcast. I was disappointed in Rush's coverage.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Anybody named Bubba or Islam can kiss my grits!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bubba Islam wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

You guys make a lot of sense. Great insight into the first 10 amendments to the constitution. Who needs Harvard Law! I'll take 6th grade any day!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Flip wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Someone asked if anyone remembered what what day it is today. Other than Rush, I haven't heard a word out of the media about what happened 64 years ago. But that's not surprising. Those guys really were of "The Greatest Generation". We owe them a debt of gratitude we can never, ever repay.As far as this upcoming election is concerned, while I'm not real happy with McCain, I'll probably vote for him for one reason and one reason only. Supreme Court nominees. One of the few good things I can say about Junior is his pics for the USSC. Even his old man managed to screw that up. If you want to have trouble sleeping tonight, just think about what you're gonna get if BO is elected.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I can see it now, Hillary is chosen as Obama's running mate, he win's in November, she and Bill hire their old Sweetwater hitman to take out Obama and presto she's the president and Bill's dipping cigars again. We all start hiding our guns in 8inch pvc tubes buried as deep as we can dig a hole and we all wonder what the #*@!! happened again!! Please- everyone pull your and your neighbors head out and vote for McCain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Martin Luther King was a man of the Lord first and a civil rights activist and leader second. He inspired many to act based on faith and a renewed sense of right and wrong.Obama is a reflection of what is wrong in this great nation - - letting the few lead the rest of us around by the noses just because they are somehow an elevated "victim" class. He won't fix anything the Chicago machine doesn't tell him to do. He is just a cheap suit in front of screaming liberals in the DNC led by the likes of Howard Dean.He would be wise to not pick Hillary as a VP. She has already remebered and referenced the Kennedy assassination.....I'm glad Audie Murphy and T. Whelen (See Above) are for Obama. He will need all the dead people the Dems can round up to vote for him since many of us can smell the difference.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Don’t think any of us need worry about Hillary being VP. That woman comes with huge baggage, Bill Clinton being the biggest. As DP said Bill's an erratic, egomaniac with a big mouth. No telling what hurtful things that man would do or say given the spot light.Last thing Hillary wants is a successful ’08 Obama Campaign and PresidencySHE SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN IT and she will in 2012. She would be the most disloyal, spiteful and resentful person I could ever imagine running for or being VP. ….Leaks to the Press, Anyone?????What I believe important is the radical, conservative Right of the GOP and the radical, liberal Left of the Democratic Party are on the outs. Both wings are screaming like souls in torment now, but the People want moderates and are giving moderates a chance. This is very healthy for the country.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FH wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Mike Diehl,Clay CooperWell said boys.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Dr. RalphGood point Martin Luther King Jr.Interesting fact of Martin Luther King Jr, he walked with even Charlton Heston and you see how the Democrats have labeled him as the enemy. I have learned that the wicked and those that are to do wrong to others quickly call others names. They quickly label people and to claim what is not rightfully theirs to get the upper hand.Martin Luther King JrWas not a Republican yet they walked with him!Was not a Democrat yet they walked with him!Was not a Independent yet they walked with him!He rose above it all because he truly belonged to Gods party. His family allowed the Democratic Party to highjack his name to use it as a weapon for political and monetary gain.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

It’s going to be very interesting on how many more Obama freaks will come out of the word work as time goes nearer to Election Day! Obama either stepped in it or needs to change his shorts and man is the stench getting really rank! If I was Obama, I’d watch my back; Hillary isn’t done yet and never will be!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Andrew wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Do the math Obama wants a 47-55% federal tax rate. He will raise the marginal rate to 39% from 33 and add 8-16% social security tax on all income. This would be a disaster for business and job growth. What is really scary is his motivation for raises taxes is to punish the rich not collect revenue. His global warming hysteria would regulate our economy to death and send even more job to China and India- which would cause more pollution. He and his bitter wife were handed most of what they have because of their race. Neither would have a snowballs chance in hell of admission to Harvard if the were white or Asian. I have no idea why an affirmative action project like his wife who was given access to the best college on the planet hates our country so much.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Old Bull wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I tried to keep up with the one hangun a month proposal, but found I was going broke after a few months.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Time to dust off "Saving Private Ryan" and watch the first fifteen minutes... like most of our war heroes say, the real heroes are the ones who never made it home.Strange how Martin Luther King Jr. said "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" and yet Obama's character is indeed lacking and he has succeeded mainly because of people who are voting for him based on the color of his skin.My name is a link to McCain's gun control record.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Dave Writes:And from Barack Obama:"…I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right…" 4/16/08When I want to piss of some of my liberal friends who are pro gun control, I reply to them:"I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to freedom of religion. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right."Kind of shocks them when you target one of the constitutional rights they happent to value and put it in the same sort of jeopordy that they would impose on the 2nd Amendment. They usually begin to "get it" that the right for citizens to own firearms is a Civil Right that is as important as the right to vote, the right to security from unreasonable search and seizure, the right to an attorney in a criminal proceeding, etc etc etc.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Col. T. Whelen wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I'm with Mr. Murphy. Hopefully my kids won't have to go to Iraq!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Audie Murphy wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I'm voting for Obama!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dinfos wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

how come no one in the media is mentioning D-Day anniversary today??? I'm with you Jack, best off topic post I've seen.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Barack Hussein Obama is an Affirmative Action candidate. Would you go to a doctor, or dentist, if the only qualification was the person's skin color? I doubt it. Yet, many people will vote for this man, solely on his ethnic background. This is insanity. He has only the minimum qualifications. He's arrogant. He can't give a speech without a teleprompter. Besides that, he thinks there are fifty-eight states.YooperJack

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dgrigz wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

To: Mr. Smith goes to Washington"Hillary is out of the picture as President forever!!!!"No one is ever out of a run for president forever, especially if they only lost in a primary.How many times has Biden tried(horrible example)? Do you honestly think that if McCain is elected that in 2010 she won't have learned her lessons from 2007-2008 and make another push if she got this far? If you do, you are greatly mistaken. If she does run again, you can buy me a beer.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mr. Smith goes to Washington wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Obama would never be my first choice but you're all missing the point. Hillary is out of the picture as President forever!!!! That's the best news I've ever heard. She is evil incarnate, period. Just having to look at her ugly mug for 4 years is scary enough. Obama, knows how to play politics. If people want guns he'll be pro-guns. We need to get the word out that we want guns. i.e. Join or renew your NRA memberships, today! Write your congressmen, senators etc. Make your opinions known. The firearms industry is one of the last successful, profitable US industries. As things get worst economically with the devalued dollar, the global economy etc. we need all the healthy US industries we can get. Other than Automobiles and firearms (and software) what do me make here?? Not much comes to mind.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jack wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Speaking of politicians, most of them should take time out today to shut their pie holes and reflect upon this day.Taking time out here to salute the men of Operation Overlord. Most especially my Uncle Leo, a farmer, hunter and soldier.Pvt. Leo Beals101st Airborne501st PIR - Company CKIA - June 6, 1944God bless you and thank you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Yes, I remember well how we got 8 yr of Bubba 'cause we were PO'd at Bush. Let's not repeat that poor decision and support McCain. O'bama scares the heck out of me for too many reasons to list.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JMH wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Gman, I hope that was an attempt at satire. Obama is a socialist, dictator wanna-be. Obama is an elitist, who wants to tell the rest of us how we should live (and then thank him for sharing his "wisdom"). His ideas (socialization of programs) requires social state taxes (50 to 85 % of your income). I don't think tax paying Americans can afford Obama.JMH

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dgrigz wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Obama is for sure a Marxist, when hezbollah PR people say they like the guy one has to wonder. His associations sure don't seem like his "Community Activism" was sponsoring bake sales and church bazaars so that a soup kitchen could be funded. As an accountant, reviewing his taxation policies make me wonder if he even went to schools like Princeton/Harvard because they make no sense. Tell me when anyone who has studies law on the left and held office has actually tried to defend the rights and liberties that we have now as opposed to establishing new "liberty limiting regulations". Is it no small coincidence that gun ownership is not viewed with such sacredness on the left as the rights of free press are to pedophiles?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FH wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Sorry GMAN but Obamma is run by the Chicago Dailey Politico machine and they think that gun laws actually work i.e. look how restrictive Chicago is. He also is very confused on Taxes, he thinks they should be raised to fund more Gov programs. He is a Marxist.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gman wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Oh, Obama will be no worse than the current occupant of the WH on 2A.You guys worry too much.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

While the SCOTUS will probably uphold the 2nd, Obama has already proven to me that while it's a person legal right to keep and bear arms, the arms he may keep will (in his eyes) be up to the government.Second, I don't see Obama putting Hillary on the ticket. Between her and Bubba, they would steal too much of his thunder.Regardless, McCain has his hands full as he reminds me of Nixon (in the way he handles himself in front of the teleprompter) and Obama is much more @ ease like Kennedy was in the Kennedy/Nixon contest of 1960.I just hope McCain can put out good ideas and sell the to the majority of the American people.He has my vote.Jim

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Just what part of Constituional Law did Osama study at Harvard?Since when can State or local ordinances overide Federal law? Certainly states have exercised the ability to regulate use of firearms, but not overruling the fundamental right to keep and bear arms. The DC handgun ban resolution should clear that up, for a while anyway.Dittos. Be careful what you wish for!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo. wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

Amen, afraid we ain't seen nothin yet.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jay wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

I think the folks on this blog need to be careful what they wish for. Barack Obama is far more liberal and more anti gun than Hillary Clinton.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mr. Smith goes to Washington wrote 3 years 50 weeks ago

You've got to admit one thing, Hillary had the nomination in the bag BEFORE Obama showed up. I still crackup every time I see Hillary with that look of "I'm not winning...????" You've got to admit we all owe Obama a debt of gratitude for taking her out of the running. She would have been guns owners worst NIGHTMARE!!! Bar none.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs