Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Way Out There: Shooting (And Hunting With) The .50 Caliber Browning Machine Gun Cartridge

Way Out There: Shooting (And Hunting With) The .50 Caliber Browning Machine Gun Cartridge

Rate This Gallery100%0%
2 of 5
Yenason and Henry must spot the target, figure range, and calculate aim before firing.

Photo Gallery Comments (26)

Top Rated
All Comments
from streack wrote 43 weeks 2 days ago

I have a hard time trying to believe that large amounts of meat is not wasted when an animal is shot by one of these.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jesse wrote 42 weeks 3 days ago

I think the 50 cal is a lil over kill

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from baconboy206 wrote 41 weeks 6 days ago

unless youre hunting whales this seems like a bit of overkill, imagine how much meat is wasted

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from wsimien wrote 41 weeks 1 day ago

Commom man a .50 cal!? I don't think shooting any game a mile out should be considered hunting. Leave this big boy for the Army snipers.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckslayer33 wrote 41 weeks 1 day ago

i do not think that is very sporting. if you want to shoot that far go to a match.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dan the Man wrote 40 weeks 2 days ago

Whatever you want, I guess. I think .50 cal is overkill and it makes me mad when I have to get within 100 yards with my shotgun and these guys can kill something from a mile away. It's not sporting, and I hope they know whre those bullets end up. Hate for it to kill somebody on a pass-through. Besides, the gun looks like it was made by "Nerf".

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Love2Hunt wrote 39 weeks 3 days ago

Those guns are are massive and a riot to shoot. I have never used it to hunt with and probably never will, but it is a fun gun to target practice with.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from LesserSon wrote 32 weeks 2 days ago

No, it's not hunting. It's long-range sniper practice on living targets. Is it a sport? Yes, because it sublimates a violent and dangerous skill into an act that does not kill humans. But hunting? No way. Where is fair chase? You might as well use a smartbomb.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunter4ever wrote 28 weeks 3 days ago

come on do you really need that big of a gun a use a twenty gauge shotgun for anything that i gun hunt (i hunt turkey, deer, rabbit, geese, and ducks) and i have no problem killing any of these with my shotgun

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rem700-06 wrote 27 weeks 4 days ago

My first thought is what animal it is you're hunting. If it is Dangerous game of a large variety (i.e. Grizzly/Brown/Polar Bears, Elephant, Hippo, Bison), then it is a lot less ridiculous than hunting an elk with it. Second, long range precision shooting is no easy task. The sheer power and range of the weapon may be a drawback, anything less than 600/700 yards would probably cause too much damage to the animal. If it is challenging to the hunter but still a humane kill, it should at least be considered. I do not own a .50 cal, and probably will never purchase one; why put limitations on those who do?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from texasfirst wrote 26 weeks 6 days ago

Grizzly with a .50 BMG might be really exciting. I've seen the results of one .50 BMG round on a kill, but it wasn't one where we were worried about meat. Other than that, I don't see an application in the hunting world. Suffice it to say, the .50 BMG is indeed serious overkill.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from rocketman121 wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Hunting with a .50 may not require as much skill to sneak up on an animal, but the person still has to know how to use a rifle. Whether it is sporting or not is not for me to judge. Some people would say using any gun (versus bow-hunting) is not sporting... Just to clarify, I do not hunt with a .50.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 25 weeks 6 days ago

The only thing I would hunt with a .50 Cal would be Osama. Or someone like him. I won't judge the guys who want one to compensate for their "shortness" ;) with one though.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 25 weeks 6 days ago

Or the "Hatbackwards types wither. ;)

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jackson Morgan wrote 21 weeks 1 day ago

I could understand the use of it if you have a deer problem at the edge of a field on your land, but using it a a standard hunting gun is insane.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 18 weeks 6 days ago

Why are they wearing camo? Do they use scent reduction stuff too?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 18 weeks 4 days ago

I know they are compensating for one lack, and that's woodsmanship and the ability to get close to game and be stealthy. They could be having a raging party and still shoot deer. Is that hunting?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from marino05 wrote 16 weeks 4 days ago

The gun John is using is not auto or semi auto it is a single shot. The .50cal BMG is overkill for the hunter who is used to 50yd out to a 300yd ethical kill shot, however these hunters do not see the ignorance in their criticism. John and Wendy are hunting, shooting and enjoying the outdoors together. Isn't this what we all are doing? We should be commending John and Wendy for forging into a new aspect of the hunting and shooting world.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 13 weeks 1 day ago

>50Cal BMG is strictly a WARTIME weapon in fully automatic weapons it is not intended for or suitable in a shoulder fired weapon for recreational use. (JMNSVHO) Shooting anything smaller than an Elephant of Polar bear with one is ridiculous in the extreme, I personally would not do it. Incidentally I have fired "MA Deuce" in Wartime and had no qualms about THAT use of it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunter13 wrote 6 weeks 5 days ago

I think a 50 cal should not be used for hunting because its over kill and if it shoots 500 yards your not realy giving the animal a chance to even know your there wich isnt fair game. I also think there not safe for hunting because If you have a bullet that goed a mile you could hurt or even kill another hunter and not even knowing it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from toadster wrote 3 weeks 6 days ago

As primarily a mule deer hunter I use a Browning BLR .234 caliber rifle. I have had success for 23 years in single shot kills out to 450 yards. And have targeted 3" groups out to 600 yrds. If overkill is the argument here any one of you using a larger caliber than me should hang your head in shame. But I think that the real discussion is something other than caliber. It is marksmanship. Can you hit reliably at whatever distance you hunt/target. Other than that I have no argument with the caliber selection nor the use. Besides you can't argue with knockdown power in a .50!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from K. Oney wrote 2 weeks 11 hours ago

this gun is over-powered for anything short of an elephant or cape buffalo. sure would love to turn a woodchuck inside-out from 500 yards, though.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mihunter wrote 1 week 2 days ago

Way to much...if you want to shoot something over a 1000 yards, shoot at a target. thats not hunting, its target practice at a live animal, which involves no hunting skill whatsoever. stupid...
Dont get me wrong, the .50BMG is a sweet gun but it has no place in the woods.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 9PointPrize wrote 5 days 22 hours ago

I hope that once you finish paying for the gun, you can still afford the ammunition. I would be a liar to say that I wouldn't love to get my hands on one of these. Though, under no circumstances would I be aiming it anything I plan to harvest. Living in Colorado for sometime, I came to really appreciate the stalking, and physical pursuit almost as much as the reward of filling the tag. Even if you don't care for this style of hunting, you shouldn't need to use a round that produces an exit wound the size of a watermelon to stand a pretty fair chance at a successful hunt. There are plenty of 30 cal rounds or even the smaller, faster 7mm rounds that will do the trick.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 9PointPrize wrote 5 days 22 hours ago

I hope that once you finish paying for the gun, you can still afford the ammunition. I would be a liar to say that I wouldn't love to get my hands on one of these. Though, under no circumstances would I be aiming it anything I plan to harvest. Living in Colorado for sometime, I came to really appreciate the stalking, and physical pursuit almost as much as the reward of filling the tag. Even if you don't care for this style of hunting, you shouldn't need to use a round that produces an exit wound the size of a watermelon to stand a pretty fair chance at a successful hunt. There are plenty of 30 cal rounds or even the smaller, faster 7mm rounds that will do the trick.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nycflyangler wrote 1 sec ago

Paleolithic hunters used methods like driving herds off cliffs, which would hardly be considered sporting now a days. The concept of fair chase would be totally foreign to them and would be seen ridiculous.

This type of hunting with a large caliber at long ranges is far more sporting than that would be.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from wsimien wrote 41 weeks 1 day ago

Commom man a .50 cal!? I don't think shooting any game a mile out should be considered hunting. Leave this big boy for the Army snipers.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from streack wrote 43 weeks 2 days ago

I have a hard time trying to believe that large amounts of meat is not wasted when an animal is shot by one of these.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jesse wrote 42 weeks 3 days ago

I think the 50 cal is a lil over kill

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from baconboy206 wrote 41 weeks 6 days ago

unless youre hunting whales this seems like a bit of overkill, imagine how much meat is wasted

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckslayer33 wrote 41 weeks 1 day ago

i do not think that is very sporting. if you want to shoot that far go to a match.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dan the Man wrote 40 weeks 2 days ago

Whatever you want, I guess. I think .50 cal is overkill and it makes me mad when I have to get within 100 yards with my shotgun and these guys can kill something from a mile away. It's not sporting, and I hope they know whre those bullets end up. Hate for it to kill somebody on a pass-through. Besides, the gun looks like it was made by "Nerf".

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Love2Hunt wrote 39 weeks 3 days ago

Those guns are are massive and a riot to shoot. I have never used it to hunt with and probably never will, but it is a fun gun to target practice with.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from LesserSon wrote 32 weeks 2 days ago

No, it's not hunting. It's long-range sniper practice on living targets. Is it a sport? Yes, because it sublimates a violent and dangerous skill into an act that does not kill humans. But hunting? No way. Where is fair chase? You might as well use a smartbomb.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from texasfirst wrote 26 weeks 6 days ago

Grizzly with a .50 BMG might be really exciting. I've seen the results of one .50 BMG round on a kill, but it wasn't one where we were worried about meat. Other than that, I don't see an application in the hunting world. Suffice it to say, the .50 BMG is indeed serious overkill.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunter4ever wrote 28 weeks 3 days ago

come on do you really need that big of a gun a use a twenty gauge shotgun for anything that i gun hunt (i hunt turkey, deer, rabbit, geese, and ducks) and i have no problem killing any of these with my shotgun

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Rem700-06 wrote 27 weeks 4 days ago

My first thought is what animal it is you're hunting. If it is Dangerous game of a large variety (i.e. Grizzly/Brown/Polar Bears, Elephant, Hippo, Bison), then it is a lot less ridiculous than hunting an elk with it. Second, long range precision shooting is no easy task. The sheer power and range of the weapon may be a drawback, anything less than 600/700 yards would probably cause too much damage to the animal. If it is challenging to the hunter but still a humane kill, it should at least be considered. I do not own a .50 cal, and probably will never purchase one; why put limitations on those who do?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from rocketman121 wrote 26 weeks 2 days ago

Hunting with a .50 may not require as much skill to sneak up on an animal, but the person still has to know how to use a rifle. Whether it is sporting or not is not for me to judge. Some people would say using any gun (versus bow-hunting) is not sporting... Just to clarify, I do not hunt with a .50.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 25 weeks 6 days ago

The only thing I would hunt with a .50 Cal would be Osama. Or someone like him. I won't judge the guys who want one to compensate for their "shortness" ;) with one though.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 25 weeks 6 days ago

Or the "Hatbackwards types wither. ;)

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 18 weeks 6 days ago

Why are they wearing camo? Do they use scent reduction stuff too?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 18 weeks 4 days ago

I know they are compensating for one lack, and that's woodsmanship and the ability to get close to game and be stealthy. They could be having a raging party and still shoot deer. Is that hunting?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from marino05 wrote 16 weeks 4 days ago

The gun John is using is not auto or semi auto it is a single shot. The .50cal BMG is overkill for the hunter who is used to 50yd out to a 300yd ethical kill shot, however these hunters do not see the ignorance in their criticism. John and Wendy are hunting, shooting and enjoying the outdoors together. Isn't this what we all are doing? We should be commending John and Wendy for forging into a new aspect of the hunting and shooting world.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jackson Morgan wrote 21 weeks 1 day ago

I could understand the use of it if you have a deer problem at the edge of a field on your land, but using it a a standard hunting gun is insane.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 13 weeks 1 day ago

>50Cal BMG is strictly a WARTIME weapon in fully automatic weapons it is not intended for or suitable in a shoulder fired weapon for recreational use. (JMNSVHO) Shooting anything smaller than an Elephant of Polar bear with one is ridiculous in the extreme, I personally would not do it. Incidentally I have fired "MA Deuce" in Wartime and had no qualms about THAT use of it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunter13 wrote 6 weeks 5 days ago

I think a 50 cal should not be used for hunting because its over kill and if it shoots 500 yards your not realy giving the animal a chance to even know your there wich isnt fair game. I also think there not safe for hunting because If you have a bullet that goed a mile you could hurt or even kill another hunter and not even knowing it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from toadster wrote 3 weeks 6 days ago

As primarily a mule deer hunter I use a Browning BLR .234 caliber rifle. I have had success for 23 years in single shot kills out to 450 yards. And have targeted 3" groups out to 600 yrds. If overkill is the argument here any one of you using a larger caliber than me should hang your head in shame. But I think that the real discussion is something other than caliber. It is marksmanship. Can you hit reliably at whatever distance you hunt/target. Other than that I have no argument with the caliber selection nor the use. Besides you can't argue with knockdown power in a .50!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from K. Oney wrote 2 weeks 11 hours ago

this gun is over-powered for anything short of an elephant or cape buffalo. sure would love to turn a woodchuck inside-out from 500 yards, though.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mihunter wrote 1 week 2 days ago

Way to much...if you want to shoot something over a 1000 yards, shoot at a target. thats not hunting, its target practice at a live animal, which involves no hunting skill whatsoever. stupid...
Dont get me wrong, the .50BMG is a sweet gun but it has no place in the woods.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 9PointPrize wrote 5 days 22 hours ago

I hope that once you finish paying for the gun, you can still afford the ammunition. I would be a liar to say that I wouldn't love to get my hands on one of these. Though, under no circumstances would I be aiming it anything I plan to harvest. Living in Colorado for sometime, I came to really appreciate the stalking, and physical pursuit almost as much as the reward of filling the tag. Even if you don't care for this style of hunting, you shouldn't need to use a round that produces an exit wound the size of a watermelon to stand a pretty fair chance at a successful hunt. There are plenty of 30 cal rounds or even the smaller, faster 7mm rounds that will do the trick.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 9PointPrize wrote 5 days 22 hours ago

I hope that once you finish paying for the gun, you can still afford the ammunition. I would be a liar to say that I wouldn't love to get my hands on one of these. Though, under no circumstances would I be aiming it anything I plan to harvest. Living in Colorado for sometime, I came to really appreciate the stalking, and physical pursuit almost as much as the reward of filling the tag. Even if you don't care for this style of hunting, you shouldn't need to use a round that produces an exit wound the size of a watermelon to stand a pretty fair chance at a successful hunt. There are plenty of 30 cal rounds or even the smaller, faster 7mm rounds that will do the trick.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nycflyangler wrote 1 sec ago

Paleolithic hunters used methods like driving herds off cliffs, which would hardly be considered sporting now a days. The concept of fair chase would be totally foreign to them and would be seen ridiculous.

This type of hunting with a large caliber at long ranges is far more sporting than that would be.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment