Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Sideshow Hoaxes and Artistic Freaks: A Creepy Collection of Rogue Taxidermy

Sideshow Hoaxes and Artistic Freaks: A Creepy Collection of Rogue Taxidermy

rogue_taxidermy1

Photo Gallery Comments (20)

Top Rated
All Comments
from green bird29 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Would you fish or hut for the squirrel fish or fish for it

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

As hunters and fishermen we see the pieces Mr. Bibus attempts to gorify. Besides the results of our own careful slicing and dicing we also witness the remains of animals captured and partially devoured by predators. If he wants reality he should also include elk with half-eaten fetuses ripped out of their wombs by wolves. Or a partially digested duckling eaten alive and regurgitated by a largemouth.

Sportsmen are intimately in touch with natural order - death begets life. No, it isn't pretty, but it is fascinating, and it is reality. Unfortunately, our modern society allows most people to ignore and escape the fact that something must die in order for us to live, whether animal or plant. Perhaps he should throw some half-eaten brussels sprouts or castrated ginseng into his art to intimate that plants also have life.

As sportsmen we admire the beauty, grace, and vitality of our quarry. We also recall the efforts, thoughts, and feelings that typified the hunt. To me, that is what great taxidermy captures. As for rogue taxidermy, to each his own.

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sharkfin wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

What amazes me is the lack of understanding by the anti-hunters and anti-meat eaters with regards to what they eat. There are those that think hunting is barbaric but don't ever think about what is in that BK bag or under the celephane in the grocery store. While the veggie only eaters don't ever stop to think about all of the animals that are killed and not used in any way during the process of growing those veggies.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from jeffo52284 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

hmm.....interesting. not really my thing but like MLH said to each their own.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

They sure have come a long way since the jackalope. Not really my kind of art, but whatever floats your boat.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from micropterus wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Yeah, I don't really see the appeal of this. I certainly wouldn't want to look at something like that everyday in my living room.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sage Sam wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I don't find any of this to be art, I find it to be juvenile behavior with the hope of shocking people.

This isn't a case of "not my thing" for me, its a case of being completely disrespectful to an animal that gave its life to someone, and that someone is not these "artists."

Honor the sacrifice made by the animal. People like Mr. Bibus think that somehow by manipulating the natural beauty of an animal that can make some sort of slanted commentary on animal rights. First they should take time to recognize the beauty of nature and the simplistic beauty of life that hunting provides.

He states

"My hope is that people will see my work and empathize with the animal whose remains were used in its creation...and that the next time they see a more traditional mount, they will stop and think about the actual life and death of that animal"

The ingnorant audacity to believe that somehow I don't appreciate the life and death of what I kill is astounding. I give thanks for the sacrifice of whatever animal falls before my bow, gun or rod. To characterize all sportsmen as blood lust filled cretins that live for the kill, isn't just myopic, its an ignorant stereotype of someone lacking perspective. Which is just one more reason you shouldn't view this tripe as "art."

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from fisherman14 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Those are are some creepy creatures

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hobob wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Couldn't ya find better copy to write about? its november for heavens sake and this stuff is disrespectful and ugly

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jordjohn44 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

This stuff is F.U.B.A.R. I don't like it but hey, if its art, who is to stop the artists from having fun?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder........fortunately I am not beholden to any of these folks.

Sage Sam, you said it all best sir.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from tourneyking734 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

a comment to photo #11, it can't be a mink because minks are a much darker color than the blond color of this animal, i would suggest a blond pine marten would be a much better match

-1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ableskeever wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Say we actually succumbed to all that PETA is pushing for. Food would be more expensive because with meat out of the equation and then there would be more demand for everything else. (Imagine how much higher the price of corn would be after seeing what happened when using it as a fuel source.)

We couldn't test any new medical drugs on animals so then would we go straight to humans?

Yes, the ecosystems in our forests are affected by humans, so that means that someone will have to manage overpopulation of certain species, or we will have animals starving to death out there which is much more cruel than a quick bullet, arrow or bolt ending its life.

Ever since Adam and Eve and the fall of man, humans have been using animals and their remains to serve their needs. I believe in the Bible and if you don't, then thats your own issue, but God is the one that made the animal skins for Adam and Eve to wear and to cover up their nakedness.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

None of the pieces in this gallery appeal to me and some are downright ugly, but those of you that say "this is not art" are revealing your ignorance. Most of us prefer art that illicits a positive reaction, but art that causes a negative reaction is just as valid as art. It appears that most of us got a similar negative reaction from these--the artist may not have gotten the reaction he hoped for, but he certainly succeeded in reaching the observer on an emotional level.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from squirrelgirl wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

remember that dude who was slicing up livestock and shellacking 'em between plexiglass? ugh. art is art but really dude. . . ugh

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Fishman69 wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

wow, some of these are pretty weird.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

Holly Cow!! Im never going swimming again!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from coho310 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

When people who don't hunt or fish look at Mr. Bibus's taxidermy,they must think "What kind of terrible person would actually kill an animal?Oh,yeah,a hunter".People like mister Bibus give us a bad name and a vegan like him uses an animal's remains to make hideous taxidermy to sell,but who would buy that disrespectful crap!So he's not even benifitting!Hunters and fisherman use the animal's lives to benifit by feeding themselves and their families,and I always pray when I take fish or animals because I respect the game and fish.

MLH,+1 for you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from coho310 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

They'll make they're livings and I'll make mine is what I ment in the comment.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ikematt2 wrote 1 year 18 weeks ago

Good point green bird29!

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from MLH wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

As hunters and fishermen we see the pieces Mr. Bibus attempts to gorify. Besides the results of our own careful slicing and dicing we also witness the remains of animals captured and partially devoured by predators. If he wants reality he should also include elk with half-eaten fetuses ripped out of their wombs by wolves. Or a partially digested duckling eaten alive and regurgitated by a largemouth.

Sportsmen are intimately in touch with natural order - death begets life. No, it isn't pretty, but it is fascinating, and it is reality. Unfortunately, our modern society allows most people to ignore and escape the fact that something must die in order for us to live, whether animal or plant. Perhaps he should throw some half-eaten brussels sprouts or castrated ginseng into his art to intimate that plants also have life.

As sportsmen we admire the beauty, grace, and vitality of our quarry. We also recall the efforts, thoughts, and feelings that typified the hunt. To me, that is what great taxidermy captures. As for rogue taxidermy, to each his own.

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sharkfin wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

What amazes me is the lack of understanding by the anti-hunters and anti-meat eaters with regards to what they eat. There are those that think hunting is barbaric but don't ever think about what is in that BK bag or under the celephane in the grocery store. While the veggie only eaters don't ever stop to think about all of the animals that are killed and not used in any way during the process of growing those veggies.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sage Sam wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

I don't find any of this to be art, I find it to be juvenile behavior with the hope of shocking people.

This isn't a case of "not my thing" for me, its a case of being completely disrespectful to an animal that gave its life to someone, and that someone is not these "artists."

Honor the sacrifice made by the animal. People like Mr. Bibus think that somehow by manipulating the natural beauty of an animal that can make some sort of slanted commentary on animal rights. First they should take time to recognize the beauty of nature and the simplistic beauty of life that hunting provides.

He states

"My hope is that people will see my work and empathize with the animal whose remains were used in its creation...and that the next time they see a more traditional mount, they will stop and think about the actual life and death of that animal"

The ingnorant audacity to believe that somehow I don't appreciate the life and death of what I kill is astounding. I give thanks for the sacrifice of whatever animal falls before my bow, gun or rod. To characterize all sportsmen as blood lust filled cretins that live for the kill, isn't just myopic, its an ignorant stereotype of someone lacking perspective. Which is just one more reason you shouldn't view this tripe as "art."

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from green bird29 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Would you fish or hut for the squirrel fish or fish for it

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jeffo52284 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

hmm.....interesting. not really my thing but like MLH said to each their own.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ableskeever wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Say we actually succumbed to all that PETA is pushing for. Food would be more expensive because with meat out of the equation and then there would be more demand for everything else. (Imagine how much higher the price of corn would be after seeing what happened when using it as a fuel source.)

We couldn't test any new medical drugs on animals so then would we go straight to humans?

Yes, the ecosystems in our forests are affected by humans, so that means that someone will have to manage overpopulation of certain species, or we will have animals starving to death out there which is much more cruel than a quick bullet, arrow or bolt ending its life.

Ever since Adam and Eve and the fall of man, humans have been using animals and their remains to serve their needs. I believe in the Bible and if you don't, then thats your own issue, but God is the one that made the animal skins for Adam and Eve to wear and to cover up their nakedness.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

None of the pieces in this gallery appeal to me and some are downright ugly, but those of you that say "this is not art" are revealing your ignorance. Most of us prefer art that illicits a positive reaction, but art that causes a negative reaction is just as valid as art. It appears that most of us got a similar negative reaction from these--the artist may not have gotten the reaction he hoped for, but he certainly succeeded in reaching the observer on an emotional level.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

They sure have come a long way since the jackalope. Not really my kind of art, but whatever floats your boat.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from micropterus wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Yeah, I don't really see the appeal of this. I certainly wouldn't want to look at something like that everyday in my living room.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from fisherman14 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Those are are some creepy creatures

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hobob wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Couldn't ya find better copy to write about? its november for heavens sake and this stuff is disrespectful and ugly

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jordjohn44 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

This stuff is F.U.B.A.R. I don't like it but hey, if its art, who is to stop the artists from having fun?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder........fortunately I am not beholden to any of these folks.

Sage Sam, you said it all best sir.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from coho310 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

They'll make they're livings and I'll make mine is what I ment in the comment.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from squirrelgirl wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

remember that dude who was slicing up livestock and shellacking 'em between plexiglass? ugh. art is art but really dude. . . ugh

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Fishman69 wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

wow, some of these are pretty weird.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Justin D wrote 2 years 13 weeks ago

Holly Cow!! Im never going swimming again!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from coho310 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

When people who don't hunt or fish look at Mr. Bibus's taxidermy,they must think "What kind of terrible person would actually kill an animal?Oh,yeah,a hunter".People like mister Bibus give us a bad name and a vegan like him uses an animal's remains to make hideous taxidermy to sell,but who would buy that disrespectful crap!So he's not even benifitting!Hunters and fisherman use the animal's lives to benifit by feeding themselves and their families,and I always pray when I take fish or animals because I respect the game and fish.

MLH,+1 for you.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ikematt2 wrote 1 year 18 weeks ago

Good point green bird29!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from tourneyking734 wrote 2 years 14 weeks ago

a comment to photo #11, it can't be a mink because minks are a much darker color than the blond color of this animal, i would suggest a blond pine marten would be a much better match

-1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

1 of 29