Besides preserving wild animals as hunting trophies and museum exhibits, taxidermy has another face that lies in sideshow monsters and hoaxes, like P. T. Barnum’s famed “Feejee mermaid” of the 1840s. Assembled from the parts of assorted animals, such literally incredible creatures were called “gaffs” because they served to hook the public to “come on in” to see what was on the inside of the carnival tent. These days the concept of the gaff has been turned into an art form, “rogue taxidermy,” a term coined in 2004 by the founders of the Minnesota Association of Rogue Taxidermists (MART).
Pieces of art like these inevitably raise questions about the meaning of taxidermy. Hunters view a mounted head as a memorial and an honor to an animal they ethically hunted and to the hunt itself, and some hunters may be offended by the way these mounted heads in this gallery have been manipulated and altered. But while many of the rogue taxidermists see the mounts they do as simply works of art, or perhaps visual humor, there are others who solemnly view them as critical comments on hunting, the relationships of humans and animals, and what they consider animal cruelty—a co-founder of MART declined to be in this gallery; and it would be fair to assume it was because of a dislike of hunting.
This a gallery of rogue taxidermy ranges from the bizarre to the horrible to the fantastic. It may make you laugh; it may make you cry; it may make you just plain angry. But the show’s about to start on the inside, so come on in. Happy Halloween.
“Fish in a Squirrel Suit (Url)”—Photo courtesy of Morgan Fields © 2009, myspace.com/slightlycurioustaxidermy, info@slightlycurious.com
Photo Gallery Comments (20)
Would you fish or hut for the squirrel fish or fish for it
As hunters and fishermen we see the pieces Mr. Bibus attempts to gorify. Besides the results of our own careful slicing and dicing we also witness the remains of animals captured and partially devoured by predators. If he wants reality he should also include elk with half-eaten fetuses ripped out of their wombs by wolves. Or a partially digested duckling eaten alive and regurgitated by a largemouth.
Sportsmen are intimately in touch with natural order - death begets life. No, it isn't pretty, but it is fascinating, and it is reality. Unfortunately, our modern society allows most people to ignore and escape the fact that something must die in order for us to live, whether animal or plant. Perhaps he should throw some half-eaten brussels sprouts or castrated ginseng into his art to intimate that plants also have life.
As sportsmen we admire the beauty, grace, and vitality of our quarry. We also recall the efforts, thoughts, and feelings that typified the hunt. To me, that is what great taxidermy captures. As for rogue taxidermy, to each his own.
What amazes me is the lack of understanding by the anti-hunters and anti-meat eaters with regards to what they eat. There are those that think hunting is barbaric but don't ever think about what is in that BK bag or under the celephane in the grocery store. While the veggie only eaters don't ever stop to think about all of the animals that are killed and not used in any way during the process of growing those veggies.
hmm.....interesting. not really my thing but like MLH said to each their own.
They sure have come a long way since the jackalope. Not really my kind of art, but whatever floats your boat.
Yeah, I don't really see the appeal of this. I certainly wouldn't want to look at something like that everyday in my living room.
I don't find any of this to be art, I find it to be juvenile behavior with the hope of shocking people.
This isn't a case of "not my thing" for me, its a case of being completely disrespectful to an animal that gave its life to someone, and that someone is not these "artists."
Honor the sacrifice made by the animal. People like Mr. Bibus think that somehow by manipulating the natural beauty of an animal that can make some sort of slanted commentary on animal rights. First they should take time to recognize the beauty of nature and the simplistic beauty of life that hunting provides.
He states
"My hope is that people will see my work and empathize with the animal whose remains were used in its creation...and that the next time they see a more traditional mount, they will stop and think about the actual life and death of that animal"
The ingnorant audacity to believe that somehow I don't appreciate the life and death of what I kill is astounding. I give thanks for the sacrifice of whatever animal falls before my bow, gun or rod. To characterize all sportsmen as blood lust filled cretins that live for the kill, isn't just myopic, its an ignorant stereotype of someone lacking perspective. Which is just one more reason you shouldn't view this tripe as "art."
Those are are some creepy creatures
Couldn't ya find better copy to write about? its november for heavens sake and this stuff is disrespectful and ugly
This stuff is F.U.B.A.R. I don't like it but hey, if its art, who is to stop the artists from having fun?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder........fortunately I am not beholden to any of these folks.
Sage Sam, you said it all best sir.
a comment to photo #11, it can't be a mink because minks are a much darker color than the blond color of this animal, i would suggest a blond pine marten would be a much better match
Say we actually succumbed to all that PETA is pushing for. Food would be more expensive because with meat out of the equation and then there would be more demand for everything else. (Imagine how much higher the price of corn would be after seeing what happened when using it as a fuel source.)
We couldn't test any new medical drugs on animals so then would we go straight to humans?
Yes, the ecosystems in our forests are affected by humans, so that means that someone will have to manage overpopulation of certain species, or we will have animals starving to death out there which is much more cruel than a quick bullet, arrow or bolt ending its life.
Ever since Adam and Eve and the fall of man, humans have been using animals and their remains to serve their needs. I believe in the Bible and if you don't, then thats your own issue, but God is the one that made the animal skins for Adam and Eve to wear and to cover up their nakedness.
None of the pieces in this gallery appeal to me and some are downright ugly, but those of you that say "this is not art" are revealing your ignorance. Most of us prefer art that illicits a positive reaction, but art that causes a negative reaction is just as valid as art. It appears that most of us got a similar negative reaction from these--the artist may not have gotten the reaction he hoped for, but he certainly succeeded in reaching the observer on an emotional level.
remember that dude who was slicing up livestock and shellacking 'em between plexiglass? ugh. art is art but really dude. . . ugh
wow, some of these are pretty weird.
Holly Cow!! Im never going swimming again!
When people who don't hunt or fish look at Mr. Bibus's taxidermy,they must think "What kind of terrible person would actually kill an animal?Oh,yeah,a hunter".People like mister Bibus give us a bad name and a vegan like him uses an animal's remains to make hideous taxidermy to sell,but who would buy that disrespectful crap!So he's not even benifitting!Hunters and fisherman use the animal's lives to benifit by feeding themselves and their families,and I always pray when I take fish or animals because I respect the game and fish.
MLH,+1 for you.
They'll make they're livings and I'll make mine is what I ment in the comment.
Good point green bird29!
Post a Comment
As hunters and fishermen we see the pieces Mr. Bibus attempts to gorify. Besides the results of our own careful slicing and dicing we also witness the remains of animals captured and partially devoured by predators. If he wants reality he should also include elk with half-eaten fetuses ripped out of their wombs by wolves. Or a partially digested duckling eaten alive and regurgitated by a largemouth.
Sportsmen are intimately in touch with natural order - death begets life. No, it isn't pretty, but it is fascinating, and it is reality. Unfortunately, our modern society allows most people to ignore and escape the fact that something must die in order for us to live, whether animal or plant. Perhaps he should throw some half-eaten brussels sprouts or castrated ginseng into his art to intimate that plants also have life.
As sportsmen we admire the beauty, grace, and vitality of our quarry. We also recall the efforts, thoughts, and feelings that typified the hunt. To me, that is what great taxidermy captures. As for rogue taxidermy, to each his own.
What amazes me is the lack of understanding by the anti-hunters and anti-meat eaters with regards to what they eat. There are those that think hunting is barbaric but don't ever think about what is in that BK bag or under the celephane in the grocery store. While the veggie only eaters don't ever stop to think about all of the animals that are killed and not used in any way during the process of growing those veggies.
I don't find any of this to be art, I find it to be juvenile behavior with the hope of shocking people.
This isn't a case of "not my thing" for me, its a case of being completely disrespectful to an animal that gave its life to someone, and that someone is not these "artists."
Honor the sacrifice made by the animal. People like Mr. Bibus think that somehow by manipulating the natural beauty of an animal that can make some sort of slanted commentary on animal rights. First they should take time to recognize the beauty of nature and the simplistic beauty of life that hunting provides.
He states
"My hope is that people will see my work and empathize with the animal whose remains were used in its creation...and that the next time they see a more traditional mount, they will stop and think about the actual life and death of that animal"
The ingnorant audacity to believe that somehow I don't appreciate the life and death of what I kill is astounding. I give thanks for the sacrifice of whatever animal falls before my bow, gun or rod. To characterize all sportsmen as blood lust filled cretins that live for the kill, isn't just myopic, its an ignorant stereotype of someone lacking perspective. Which is just one more reason you shouldn't view this tripe as "art."
Would you fish or hut for the squirrel fish or fish for it
hmm.....interesting. not really my thing but like MLH said to each their own.
Say we actually succumbed to all that PETA is pushing for. Food would be more expensive because with meat out of the equation and then there would be more demand for everything else. (Imagine how much higher the price of corn would be after seeing what happened when using it as a fuel source.)
We couldn't test any new medical drugs on animals so then would we go straight to humans?
Yes, the ecosystems in our forests are affected by humans, so that means that someone will have to manage overpopulation of certain species, or we will have animals starving to death out there which is much more cruel than a quick bullet, arrow or bolt ending its life.
Ever since Adam and Eve and the fall of man, humans have been using animals and their remains to serve their needs. I believe in the Bible and if you don't, then thats your own issue, but God is the one that made the animal skins for Adam and Eve to wear and to cover up their nakedness.
None of the pieces in this gallery appeal to me and some are downright ugly, but those of you that say "this is not art" are revealing your ignorance. Most of us prefer art that illicits a positive reaction, but art that causes a negative reaction is just as valid as art. It appears that most of us got a similar negative reaction from these--the artist may not have gotten the reaction he hoped for, but he certainly succeeded in reaching the observer on an emotional level.
They sure have come a long way since the jackalope. Not really my kind of art, but whatever floats your boat.
Yeah, I don't really see the appeal of this. I certainly wouldn't want to look at something like that everyday in my living room.
Those are are some creepy creatures
Couldn't ya find better copy to write about? its november for heavens sake and this stuff is disrespectful and ugly
This stuff is F.U.B.A.R. I don't like it but hey, if its art, who is to stop the artists from having fun?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder........fortunately I am not beholden to any of these folks.
Sage Sam, you said it all best sir.
They'll make they're livings and I'll make mine is what I ment in the comment.
remember that dude who was slicing up livestock and shellacking 'em between plexiglass? ugh. art is art but really dude. . . ugh
wow, some of these are pretty weird.
Holly Cow!! Im never going swimming again!
When people who don't hunt or fish look at Mr. Bibus's taxidermy,they must think "What kind of terrible person would actually kill an animal?Oh,yeah,a hunter".People like mister Bibus give us a bad name and a vegan like him uses an animal's remains to make hideous taxidermy to sell,but who would buy that disrespectful crap!So he's not even benifitting!Hunters and fisherman use the animal's lives to benifit by feeding themselves and their families,and I always pray when I take fish or animals because I respect the game and fish.
MLH,+1 for you.
Good point green bird29!
a comment to photo #11, it can't be a mink because minks are a much darker color than the blond color of this animal, i would suggest a blond pine marten would be a much better match
Post a Comment