Why Register?Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.
Welcome to Field & Stream!
Question by Del in KS. Uploaded on April 08, 2009
All of them will do the job, I would take the one you sre the most comfortable with.
I agree with rrmont, take the one you shoot the best. I would also take into consideration the type of country you will be hunting in, as in possible ranges at which you will be taking shots from. Whatever you choose, get a good solid bullet, especially with the 25-06, you want good penetration, and some bullets for that caliber may give you issues with over expansion and lack of penetration.
Whichever one you haven't used for elk, yet. Why? Because they should all work with the right bullet. Otherwise, I'd consider which bullets you want to try out, the terrain you'll be hunting, the scope you have mounted, and whether you're willing to bang up the gun.
There's been so much talk here about the .25-06 that I think a lot of people would like to see you use that.
The .30-06 has taken so many that it's ... yawn ... just another elk taken with old dependable.
The .350 Rem. Mag - that just makes me smile because I love .35s and know that should work just fine.
If recoil is not an issue, the 30 06 would be my choice. I've taken elk with my 257 Ackley Improved with no problem, and it is similar to the 25 06. I've also killed several elk with the 35 Whelen and the 358 Norma, which pretty well bracket the 35 Rem Mag. The 06 would be my choice of this group. We tend to over intellectualize elk and deer hunting. Your first shot is your best one, use it wisely.
Hey Del, I've been trying to send you your wild plum jam to no avail. Need some mailing help. Kindest Regards Happy
The old .350 is a neat cartridge. No doubt it will deliver the goods. Do you need all the thump? Probably not. No doubt the old '06 will get it done.
I'm a big 25/06 fan, but... I know it's been done even on large bulls. To me that is kind of like shooting a deer with a .22/250 it works with a good bullet and good placement, but is it the best tool for the job? As I related in your previous post a buddy of mine bang/flopped an average cow with a 100 grain Barnes X. I believe deep down he would still have preferred something bigger.
In the timber I would definitely tote the .350, what the heck give your old .350 another dance around the room!
30-06 it is a power gun it is easy to carry and it shoots 400 yards that what i shot my mule deer with.
Everything else being equal, I would go with the 30-06. It delivers a heavier bullet than the 25-06 and it will likely be easier to find good quality bullets for better penetration. The .350 would certainly get the job done, too, but wouldn't be nearly as flat as the 30-06 if you need to reach out there. My vote always goes to the flattest cartidge with enough oomph to get it done reliably.
I would carry a .350 Rem Mag definetly not a 25-06 they don't have the range of any of the other guns.
30-06 is my choice because of penetration,knock down amd distance,there is so many uses and grain weight chices to pick from.
So that Elk I shot at 237 yds with 117 gr in 25-06 must have been in range . Sure tasted good.
Dell if you think your shots will be 300 yards or under what the hell it will not have a problem puting a elk down. Half the guys in the town I live in keep telling me you cant kill anything with a 7mm, but a 270 is just dandy well I prove them wrong every year. The choice is shoot the one you think best.
Use the .350!
potterman, in another post, you didn't even know what a 25-06 was. a 25-06 DOES have great range. 500 yard shots if necessary. Del, i would go with the 25-06. it makes a good story when you're telling people that you shot an elk with one of the smaller elk calibers. just like MLH said, a 30-06 has taken too many big bulls, yawn, try something different. i would feel it to be more rewarding to kill a huge animal with a small bullet, rather than give it the ole "BANG FLOP"-clay. it's your choice, do what's comfortable to you.
PotterMan96 . . .
A primary design function of the 25-06 is long-range, flat trajectory shooting. This is due to the 25-06's ability to push aerodynamic bullets out the barrel at velocities ranging from 3100 to 3700 fps, depending on bullet weight. For example, a very experienced shooter with a excellent rifle on a calm day can drop a prairie dog at 600-700 yards, a coyote at 500 yards, a deer at 400 yards, or an elk at 300, if using proper bullets of the right construction. (Of course, most very experienced shooters keep all their shots on game animals to 300 yards and under, but that's a different issue.) The 25-06 comes very close to being an ideal all-purpose cartridge for
non-dangerous game in the USA.
The .350 Remington Magnum, on the other hand, is primarily a short-range, slow velocity, big-slug cartridge. Muzzle velocity is anemic when compared to any of the fast .25s, .264s, .277s, .284s and .308s. After about 175 yards, bullets fired from a .350 Remington Magnum take on the aerodynamic characteistics, trajectory and flight path of a coke machine when dropped out the back of a parked pickup.
Many of the people who read and write on these blog message boards are experienced shooters and reloaders who have put a whole lot of bullets downrange for a whole lot of years. You might wish to study your reloading manuals and published factory ballistics tables--and do quite a bit of handloading and shooting along the way--before you incorrectly condemn a great cartridge and incorrectly praise an unremarkable one.
By the way, my own vote:
For a cow elk and ranges of 300 yards or under, I'll take a 25-06 or its equivalent, the .257 Ackley Improved (I've owned a 25-06 and own two 257 AI rifles). I would use the Nosler 110-grain Accubond or 115-grain Partition or 120-grain Partition, or the Barnes 115-grain TSX, all of them pushed by a very healthy load of H-100-V powder and, in sub-zero winter enviroments, magnum primers.
For a trophy bull (again at ranges of 300 yards and under), I'd take the 30-06, again using the Accubond or Partition or TSX, with bullet weights from 150-180 grains (I've fired many hundreds of 30-06 rounds, though I have not owned one for many years).
I wouldn't use a .350 Remington Magnum unless I absolutely had no other choice, and I would limit my shot to 175 yards or under. (I've fired perhaps 20 rounds of .350 Remington Magnum in a Remington Model 673 shooting 250-grain bullets at about 2550 fps muzzle velocity.) Yes, it's true that if you can find 180-grain bullets to handload in the cartridge, and if you have a rifle with a decent-length barrel you can push handloaded bullets out the muzzle at close to 3000 fps--which admittedly will give the shooter a decent trajectory out to 300 yards-- but if one handloads the big 220-225 grainers or 250-grainers, muzzle velocity maxes out around 2600 or 2450 fps respectively, which equates to short-range trajectories only. Plus, the .350 Remington Magnum, unless I am in error, is not available as a factory cartridge these days, and may not be chambered in any factory-produced rifles these days either.
I guided for a guy that regualary shot and killed elk w/ a .243 he would'nt let anybody shoot less then .300 Win Mags though. As for as your question, shoot what you feel comfortable with. As for the rounds offered, the .350 will kill 'em deader than a mackrel, but not a lot of range. .25-06 range but(I feel no knock down power at range) it's a fine rifle for thin skined game but this is elk we're talking about. Now as for the .30-06 sure its killed lots of elk(yawn?, I thought thats what you we're trying to do!).It's got range(second longest recorded shot in military history, behind the.50 cal)if you screw up and leave ammo at home you can get some almost ANYWHERE ! I'm from the Ruark school "Use Enough Gun ! Good luck and good hunting !
I can most definatly can tell you havnt researched your guns. The 25-06 has much more range than the 350. The 30-06 would be the best gun for the job. I say that because it barly has less knock down power than the 350 but has more range.
What are you talkin about hunterkid in an old question you had never even heard about a 25-06 so you have no room to talk.
Agreed with MLH answer above and A + 1 for you sir!!!
Fieldandstream.com is part of the Field & Stream Network, a division of Bonnier Corporation.
Copyright © 2012 Bonnier Corp. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.