Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Merwin: Better Split-Rings for Bigger Fish

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Honest Angler
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

August 24, 2009

Merwin: Better Split-Rings for Bigger Fish

By John Merwin

Let’s get back to some hard-core fishing. As some here know full well, there are lots of little things in fishing that mean a great deal--sharp hooks, good knots, and--yes--split rings. These are the little double coils of wire that hold the hooks on many lures. The following doesn’t happen too often, but it can happen. You hook an unusually big or strong fish, the split ring pulls apart, the fish gets away, and the air turns blue with words you never heard in Sunday school.

So I was talking with Terry Trattner a while back, who has a company called Wolverine Tackle out in Illinois. Wolverine makes so-called “super rings” that Trattner says are the strongest around. These split rings are made of three wire coils instead of two. I told Trattner that I thought he had a pretty good product, but that too few people knew about it. He of course allowed as how that was true. So here we are.

The Wolverine rings are available in both stainless-steel and black finishes and in four sizes. The newest and smallest size (#4) looks about right for most largemouth-bass lures. The muskie and striper guys would probably want to go a little bigger. The price is right around $1.30 for a 10-pack. Split rings are fairly easy to replace as long as you have a pair of split-ring pliers. Or use your thumbnail, which can get painful if you’re not careful. Anyway, stronger split rings seem to me like cheap insurance if big fish are in the offing....

Comments (8)

Top Rated
All Comments
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

It's funny how many blogs on here are about things I have recently been involved in. I pulled the muskie lures out the other day and went over a few with a hook sharpener. I never thought of replacing the "O" rings but considering how few fish I hook compared to the number of hours spent fishing, it would be a $1.30 well spent.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

yeah 1.30 is a small price to pay for a little insurance. i fish in saltwater so the larger sizes are interesting. you never quite know what is going to hit a trolling lure in the deep blue ocean.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from streack wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

Mr. Merwin,
I now know, thanks to you, how important good split rings are, but I would like to know how strong are the interlock snaps on a ball bearing swivel. During a recent trip to Canada I unfortunately lost a trophy Northern Pike when it bent my interlock snap straight. I was using 20lb test Fireline Crystal fastened to the ball bearing interlock snap; which I figured would have broken before swivel did. This was a brand new swivel and they cost $3.99 for a pack of 5, but I was disappointed and very religious when I found out why my fish got off. Any insight on the strength rating of different sized interlock ball bearing swivels would be greatly appreciated.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

Three; that magic number. Always better than two.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from johnmerwin wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

Hey, Streack:
Interlock snaps are terrible and not strong at all. In choosing snaps for strength, from weakest to strongest: interlock, duo-lock, coastlock, and cross-lok (Berkley). Google the various snap names I just cited for pictorial examples and sources. I usually use cross-loks, unless the cross-lok wire configuration won't fit in the eye of a particular lure. Then I use duo-locks, but don't really like them. Hope that's helpful, and better luck next time!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

I've been changing my split-rings,along with the treble hooks on all of my new,and old lures,for the last 6-years.

I use the Daiichi,Strong Wide Gap,Treble Hooks,with the Wolverine Super Rings,and a pair of split-ring pliers.

My buddy turned me on to the Wolverine,Superior, Super Rings ... he only uses the best,especially when tournament fishing,when every hook-up is a potential money maker.

Sure makes hookin' up easier and safer!

Great article!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Vineyarder wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Mr. Merwin:

Can you refer me to the name of a magazine that focuses entirely, or at least primarily, on surfcasting and/or surf-fishing? I subscribe to F&S but would like to subscribe to a specialized surfcasting magazine as well.
Thanks,
Vineyarder(vze3rstr@verizon.net)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 15 weeks ago

A lot of people under-estimate and look past the weakness of ordinary split rings... hell, I do it myself. I without a doubt would pay a little over a dollar as an insurance policy for catching big fish, because there is nothing worse than the feeling of letting a big one get away.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from streack wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

Mr. Merwin,
I now know, thanks to you, how important good split rings are, but I would like to know how strong are the interlock snaps on a ball bearing swivel. During a recent trip to Canada I unfortunately lost a trophy Northern Pike when it bent my interlock snap straight. I was using 20lb test Fireline Crystal fastened to the ball bearing interlock snap; which I figured would have broken before swivel did. This was a brand new swivel and they cost $3.99 for a pack of 5, but I was disappointed and very religious when I found out why my fish got off. Any insight on the strength rating of different sized interlock ball bearing swivels would be greatly appreciated.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from johnmerwin wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

Hey, Streack:
Interlock snaps are terrible and not strong at all. In choosing snaps for strength, from weakest to strongest: interlock, duo-lock, coastlock, and cross-lok (Berkley). Google the various snap names I just cited for pictorial examples and sources. I usually use cross-loks, unless the cross-lok wire configuration won't fit in the eye of a particular lure. Then I use duo-locks, but don't really like them. Hope that's helpful, and better luck next time!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

It's funny how many blogs on here are about things I have recently been involved in. I pulled the muskie lures out the other day and went over a few with a hook sharpener. I never thought of replacing the "O" rings but considering how few fish I hook compared to the number of hours spent fishing, it would be a $1.30 well spent.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

yeah 1.30 is a small price to pay for a little insurance. i fish in saltwater so the larger sizes are interesting. you never quite know what is going to hit a trolling lure in the deep blue ocean.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

Three; that magic number. Always better than two.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 2 years 24 weeks ago

I've been changing my split-rings,along with the treble hooks on all of my new,and old lures,for the last 6-years.

I use the Daiichi,Strong Wide Gap,Treble Hooks,with the Wolverine Super Rings,and a pair of split-ring pliers.

My buddy turned me on to the Wolverine,Superior, Super Rings ... he only uses the best,especially when tournament fishing,when every hook-up is a potential money maker.

Sure makes hookin' up easier and safer!

Great article!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Vineyarder wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Mr. Merwin:

Can you refer me to the name of a magazine that focuses entirely, or at least primarily, on surfcasting and/or surf-fishing? I subscribe to F&S but would like to subscribe to a specialized surfcasting magazine as well.
Thanks,
Vineyarder(vze3rstr@verizon.net)

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 15 weeks ago

A lot of people under-estimate and look past the weakness of ordinary split rings... hell, I do it myself. I without a doubt would pay a little over a dollar as an insurance policy for catching big fish, because there is nothing worse than the feeling of letting a big one get away.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs