Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

In-Depth Coverage on Potential Fallout From Huge Cuts to Land, Water Conservation Fund Budget

Recent Comments


Recent Posts



Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Conservationist
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

August 22, 2013

In-Depth Coverage on Potential Fallout From Huge Cuts to Land, Water Conservation Fund Budget

By Ben Romans

On July 23 the U.S. House of Representatives approved a bill that would eliminate all but $20 million of the Land and Water Conservation Fund’s (LWCF) $900 million budget—money earmarked for conservation projects across the nation.

Established by congress in 1965, the LWCF uses royalties generated from oil and gas production on federal leases to help acquire and maintain public lands in order to protect clean water, wildlife, and public land access. But since its inception, legislators have been siphoning money from the LWCF into the government’s general fund, despite escalating revenues from offshore oil production. According to the Land and Water Conservation Fund Coalition, congress has fully funded the program only once in its 48 year history.

In this piece for Montana’s Bully Pulpit, the first in a three-part series, Field & Stream's Conservationist blogger Hal Herring illustrated the damage that the latest reduction would cause by highlighting a Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation project to acquire land along Tenderfoot Creek—a critical tributary of Montana's famous Smith River—with LWCF funds.

Check out the first installment in the series on the purchase of the Tenderfoot Creek in the Smith River watershed of Montana here:


Photo courtesy of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

Post a Comment

Post a Comment