"If someone's going to eat that deer, I want it to be natural predators..." Uh, ma'am, in case you didn't realize this, humans ARE natural predators! And, um, as another small point, crime scenes generally have to involve an illegal action of some sort...

Animal rights activists do not understand ecology or conservation. They operate strictly on emotion, and resort to emotional appeals for support. Therefore, rational discussion with them is useless. In their world, Bambi lives to a ripe old age, lays down underneath a beautiful oak tree, and expires in his deep, peaceful sleep - unless a big, bad hunter comes along and cruelly kills the poor thing. If they would get out of their houses and get into the woods, they'd have their eyes openned to the beauty, and cruelty, of nature.

this happened to a friend of mine last year but it was about 15 miles outside of town. He shot a deer on a friends property and it ran and died on someone elses property. The owner refused him access to the deer and even called the police and fish and game to come arrest my friend. But when they arrived they told the woman that she was wrong and they escorted my friend to his deer. In my state you must first ask the landowner for permission to cross his land to get an animal. If permission is not given then the fish and game will step in on the hunters side.

Since it "is" a crime scene I think that she should have a DNA test done on the victim. This could determine whether this deer is truly innocent or whether it has been involved in any unrelated or unsolved crimes. There is a huge problem with deer on deer violence in our "communities". It's time we put and end to it once and for all. ;)

These idiots don't even know how to be smart about their efforts. The guy shot a deer, if he can't recover the deer it dies for nothing. Second, he is going to just go shoot another deer. So if these idiots were really wanting to save deer they would let him get the deer. These people are so messed up they can't even think straight. Proves these people are anti-hunters not pro-animal. What morons, there is no reason to not allow a a hunter to recover a deer unless the deer falls in your marijuana garden.

I bet that carcass will attract a cougar into eating that lady's toy poodle (not that I wish any such death upon innocent poodles) and then she'll wish she'd allowed that hunter to remove the deer

Just read steve182's comment it says it all. Stamford had to quit a deer hunt a day early because of death threats?? Just shows how ridiculous these animal rights activists are-make death threats cause of a deer hunt. so they'll kill a human before a deer?

Their (the anti's) 'cause' isn't about saving the deer, or habitat, or squirrels, or any of that. It's about creating victims, and painting themselves as victims as well. And then being able to dictate their personal beliefs on others.

That is a shame. Here in AZ harassing a hunter is a Class 2 misdemeanor, or a Class 3 misdemeanor if it occurs on state land.

If she is as concerned about animal rights as she claims, she better be a vegan and not own any leather or make-up. As I have found most "animal rights" activists are the biggest ignorant hippocrates that I have ever come into contact with!! Just reading her argument is an insult to my intelligence.

The best thing he could have said to them would be " OK Cool! cause know I don't have to use my tag on a small deer, know I can kill a bigger one. Thanks! Thanks alot!

What a waste of venison.
Some of these antis are just oxygen theives.
I can believe she took pictures of the animal dying for her self gratification and to add to her propaganda rather than let someone recovery the deer.

I've had a run in our too with anti's but not like this. more like a verbal pissin contest and an agree to disagree.

They don't harass the hunters round here some of them ol boys'll send em packin with a bottom full of hot lead lol.

In Ontario, the law states that you may not interfere with law full hunting, fishing and trapping activities. Those death threats would be investigated and charges laid if found to be true. Also in Ontario, the landowner could and SHOULD be charges with allowing game meat or fish to spoil. If the hunter were allowed to access the property, then the deer could have been used as food. By denying the hunter the opportunity to recover, I think the onus would transfer to the landowner to prevent the deer from spoiling.

Either way, a sad tale...

What i dont understand is that people actually believe that animals deserve more right then us humans. What they dont realize is that when us hunters hunt the animal we have the upmost respect for the animal we hunt thats why we hunt them because we admire them and there intelligence....STUPID PEOPLE...

To bad it wasn't a skunk!

I just dont understand how some people actually believe hunting causes animals to breed more? Comments like these are obviously from individuals that dont know what they are talking about.

Well, this crazy woman has the honor of the stench of rotting meat in her backyard. Have their friends and family over for a visit. Liberal insanity on display.

What I would like to say about these people you can't say on this website. I give credit for all the great comments above.

I only want to ask one question.
Can you fix stupid?
Proud to say, I am a member of P.E.T.A. (People Eating Tasty Animals)!