Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Mr. Echols' Legend, Explained (Part I)

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

March 11, 2009

Mr. Echols' Legend, Explained (Part I)

By David E. Petzal

D’Arcy Echols is a Utah gunmaker who turns out the most expensive synthetic-stocked working guns I know of. His Legend rifle currently sells for $14,000. These past few weeks, courtesy of a Legend owner who very generously lent me one, I got a chance to see what goes into a rifle that costs this much. Broken down into components, it looks like this:

McMillan fiberglass stock, made to Echols’ own pattern.
24-inch Kreiger barrel (a number 3 taper, I think)
Left-hand Winchester Model 70 action with the original bottom metal

The metal is rust blued, the stock is plain black, and the rifle weighs 9 pounds with scope. It’s chambered for the .404 Jeffrey, an old but highly useful cartridge that Hornady just brought back to life. The .404 fires a 400-grain bullet at 2,100 fps, so this is a dangerous-game rifle. It’s been to Africa twice, and has about 500 rounds through it. It is, you might say, nothing more than a highly worked-over Model 70. And this is true, in the sense that the car that Jeff Gordon drives is a highly worked-over Chevrolet.

To understand Mr. Echols’ approach to gun building, let us turn for a moment to the world of shipbuilding. Marine engineers build ships to withstand the worst conditions they might reasonably encounter in their 30-year lives, say, sustained 30-foot seas. You can build a ship to survive 60-foot seas, but it costs more than the buyers will pay. If D’Arcy Echols were a shipyard, he would be building for 70-foot seas. His rifles are made so that even the most unlikely failures and malfunctions are eliminated before they have a chance to occur.

An example: I’ve never heard of the bolt handle coming off a Model 70 bolt body. Never. (The handle is press-fit on the die-cast bolt sleeve.) Yet it did happen to an African PH named Robin Hurt, and at a very inconvenient time. But Echols heard of it, and so his shop pins the handle to the sleeve with a steel dowel .200 from the rear of the bolt.

The McMillan stocks get their own special treatment. I’ve never heard of a McMillan stock failing, or even of a problem with one. But here’s what the Echols shop does: A secondary recoil lug (and it is a massive one) is welded to the barrel about 4 inches ahead of the receiver. The stock is then hollowed out from the secondary lug right back to the front of the receiver inlet. The cavity is poured full of Marine-Tex fiberglass, and when dry it’s drilled to accommodate three ¼-inch steel crossbolts, one behind the secondary recoil lug, one behind main recoil lug, and a third behind the magazine box.

(To be continued.)

Comments (82)

Top Rated
All Comments
from 60256 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

I wouldn't want to be carrying around a nine pound gun. Mine's only 7.

Nate

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from streack wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

This gun sounds like a marvel of modern engineering. What surprises me is that based on the picture the gun looks normal, but the old saying, don't judge a book by its cover, certainly applies to this situation.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Echols’ dangerous game rifles sound as if they are “finished” although in the photo this 404 Jeffrey doesn’t appear to have express sights. I have two “dangerous game” rifles that I put considerable labor in to modify and enhance. One is a Winchester 70 458 and other is a 35 Whelen I built on a Mauser action. The Winchester is a pretty good product straight from the factory, but the action needed to smoothed up and drag eliminated. I was shocked to see this model 70’s feed ramp wasn’t polished. My Mauser I did a bunch of metal work to true and polish the action to eliminate drag..and I did the stock work.

These are very time consuming labors of love. I can see where having this work done by a custom rifle smith jacks up the price of the rifle.

BTW 60256 a 7-lbs heavy rifle doesn't sound like something I'd like to shoot.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idduckhntr wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

who cares what it weighs I have not seen a synthetic gun worth $14000,now if it xxx walnut the we'll talk.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from KJ wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Would a second recoil lug have any effect, positive or negative, on accuracy?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

African Safari $15,000

PH Tip $1,000

Hospitalization $30,000
and medevac flight
after being charged
by Dagga Boy

Rifle that works: PRICELESS

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

guns for yuppies, great

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

All for only 14K. Hum... Montana Rifle Works can put someting similar (their M1999 Improved Win Action) with their own barrel (while not a Kreiger, still good) together for about $1,400 - $1,600. Bet the Dagga Boy wouldn't know the difference.

But what the heck... If you have the cash for the 15K safari why not a 14K rifle?

If I sound bitter Dave, it's because I am...

+9 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Now, presented as an engineering, or a history class, that is very interesting. I like stories about masters of their craft who can make such fine machinery.

But to imply that it is, under any remotely believable circumstances at all, necessary, or worthy of a year-and-a-half of my mortgage is inconceivable. (got that word from "The Princess Bride")

Before I get yelled at, give me a chance. I love nice engraving. I like fancy metal trim. But I am logical enough to realize that nobody I have ever known, read, seen, or heard has said; "Boy, that gun shot like crap until I got it engraved, now I hit dimes at 800 yards.".

So while this is a miracle of highly skilled labor, I fail to see any improvement that justifies the extra $12,000. An off-the-shelf action is still at the heart, that. You remain at the mercy of the suppliers and milling of that steel.

And before you say that engraving compared to mechanical changes is bogus, let me say that might not have been the best example. I was (I think) also trying to imply that the reason people spend such heinous amounts of money on what is at heart a standard action could be mental. (Not as in ill, but of the mind). I have known people who shot better with expensive rifles not really better than one they had simply because they thought they would. Maybe confidence helped. I have a fancy rifle, ergo; I will shot better. But I also had a few friends I didn't want to be in the same county with, even with one of these.

Last time I was out with my nephew, I put 3 rounds in a red dot about the size of a dime. I was using a 700, .30-06, with a plain Bushnell Banner scope. The range was 140 yards. The target used was one of the .pdf files from the Remington site; the one with the small red-dot bull.

So with this rifle, and my current skill, it is implied that for a mere $13,000 more than I spent, I can push this out a few more yards?

As for the safety enhancements, we all risk our lives more on the highways every single day than we ever would in a one-in-a-billion odds failure.

So as an example of skill, thank you. But some of us love your articles on things, like, the ones on Mossbergs the other day, or North American game, or something I might go to Bass pro and actually buy, rather than something You would fly your private jet to Egypt to pay a ransom for.

I apologize. I have quit reading others because it just got so out of touch with "us folk" there wasn't anything to learn. There are many fine contributors (and writers) here. More for us commoners, please.

+12 Good Comment? | | Report
from spuddog wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Hey guys, if I can't afford this gun can I just take my .270 win on the safari?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DrKarupt wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

14,000.00 for a plastic stocked Rifle! The only place that would happen is in his own mind! Whatever happened to the pride you felt and the warmth of a walnut stock? Who ever has that kind of money is welcome to spend it however they wish, I guess. And yes, I do mean plastic, all the word "synthetic" means is "man made".

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Thanks Guys, another weapon that's fine to look at but who the hell could AFFORD IT !!! You can get an over the counter gun in the some caliber for about 1/10 that price.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

You could get a really accurate, reliable, good-looking, walnut-stocked, over-the-counter rifle for 1/10 the price.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

I guess the Mossberg article was just too much for Mr. Petzal to bear.

Jim

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from Shootstir wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

At a net value of $97.22/ounce...you could have an entire gun carved from pure Silver for your one-of-a-kind gun collections, and still have enough money left over to purchase that fine Krieghoff you've been drooling over- or that mint condition Holland & Holland .404 Jeffrey (the real thing, not a copy).

What's the saying? "A fool and his money are soon parted."

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from s-kfry wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

I look at the law of diminishing returns. For $14 grand there is a lot of hunting I can do right here with the Savage I already have. Heck, for $14k I could pick up a cheaper gun and go to Alaska for caribou and grizzly. Sorry, call me cheap but it just isn’t worth it though I can value the craftsmanship.

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

To KJ: A second recoil lug has no effect on accuracy either way, but it's a very good means of keeping the stock from splitting.

To Beekeeper: Don't be bitter. It will cause you to age prematurely.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Did someone say that ugly thing is pretty? They want 14K and it's one rain shower from rusty. If it's supposed to be tough you'd think they would at least Weatherproof it. Rest assured I could hit the powerball (but I don't gamble) and still would not pay for one of those. He could buy a Kimber and have it Cerakoted for about $1250. It would be almost as pretty as Eliza what's 'er name, would still get the job done and you would be $12,750 better off. Wonder if the feller felt any change hit him in the a$$ as he left that gun shop.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Dave,

My friend has $500 bucks and wants a first deer rifle. Can you come up with a better idea than a Marlin bolt gun with a 4X scope and Leupold rings in 25-06 for a newby deer hunter?

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I'd rather buy a standard Remington model 700 and good scope. Then after I'm done splurging on one of the finest guns ever made I'd still have enough money left over to make around 9 or 10 house payments and buy ammo.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Yeah Del, same gun only in 30-06 that way he could hunt black bear, northern whitetails and elk not just little goats.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Guy's maybe we all have this Mr. Echols wrong. He is obviously a very talented and highly skilled craftsman, and after some thought I believe that high level of skill equates well with his business sense.

He has this thing all figured out. You get overly wealthy magazine editors to buy your rifles for $10,000 to $20,000 each. Subsequently he has to produce fewer and doesn't need to work as hard. Less wear and tear on the eyes and other essential equipment. He also doesn't have to constantly reinvent himself nor his product. That my friends is efficiency at its finest...

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from The Armchair Ou... wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Custom rifles in magazines are like centerfold models. Most of us will never have one, but we still like to look at them. Go figure.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Del

I'm not Dave, but my 2 cents for a first deer rifle would be a nice Savage (or Stevens 200) model 10 series in .308 Winchester with a decent Nikon or Sightron scope if he has to have "new". My son's first deer rifle is a Savage 99F that he paid $175 for with a Swift 4x scope in Weaver rings. Of course you can't get one for $175 in decent shape anymore, but I think you might find one for $400 in good condition. We have both killed deer with it and he still uses it these past 14 years. He leaves the Big 7 at home when hunting deer. It has even killed elk. Imagine, a .308 elk killer! The other part is that the Savage 99 will be worth more than he paid for it real soon while it's not likely with the Marlin or Savage 110.

If he's recoil shy, get a Savage 99 in .300 Savage. I have one and it shoots real nice. Ammo is a little more expensive, but I handload so I don't care.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Remember that old thread about guns you wish you had kept. Well I once had a pre-war mdl 99 in 300 Savage that looked brand new. Left to me by a relative. Not a fan of those and sold it for 400 bucks 5 yr ago. Wonder what it was really worth.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from azduane wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I love it. If I could afford something like this then I would be hunting in more exotic places that I can right now and after some real "bada@@" animals that bite, gore, etc. back.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Hey Guys,

Send me $12000 and I'll pin the bolt, bed the barrel and weld on an extra recoil lug on TWO of your favorite rifles! All told, you'll have two rifles at the price of one!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

For 14k I would insist on nothing less than an intricately carved 11,000 year old Mammoth Ivory Manlicher stock pulled from Siberian permafrost with gold damascining and niello, flawless Ceylon rubies in the front and back sights, platinum double set triggers on a perfect button rifled Damascus steel barrel as well as an Alpaca lined guncase made of Komodo Dragon leather with sterling silver fittings.
Kinda like the wheelock rifles used by Nobles of the Holy Roman Empire in the 16th century yo see in the Metropolitan museum of art, but modern...
Heck we could put the extension on the farmhouse for that kinda money!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I have been impressed with D'arcy and his rifles for years and years. I have even handled a few of the rifles. Nice guns but my local gunsmith can create an equal weapon for about one quarter to one third the price even to the point of all the little intricate details that Echols does to the latter day Winchester actions. Heck he will even put the scope on if you're too lazy plus sight it in so you only have to fine tune it to suit yourself.
Actually I think Dave wrote this blog just to see if he could get more responses to it than the .270 vs .30-'06 post. He knows what sets us off. Probably laughing his a$$ off.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Now this is one expensive gun. Period. I wonder(around in circles) why Dave feeds us this expensive sort of gun diet? Anyway, it does seem like a strongly built rifle, but I agree that for the $$$ I would like to see some very pretty wood on it! By the way, most bolt guns have been doing the job well, in large safari calibers, for years. Are all the beefy upgrades really necessary? I guess if I could afford it; I would buy it just for conversation sake!I guess???

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I bet every one of us felt really good after reading this item. We've all got hunting rifles. I bet we all really like our rifles. Not one of us paid, maybe, ten per cent of what that rifle cost. Hell, we can all feel good! We've got at something probably as good for our hunting needs, and we've all saved $12,000.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

YooperJack, you nailed that one spot on!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Daniel Boone is said to have looked at a pioneer's ugly rifle and said something to the effect, "Thy rifle hath great power, but is exceedingly plain."

This focus on plastic stocked rifles is much the same. Only pretty booth babes are interesting...and, only handsome rifles, or historical rifles, may catch our eye. Can we see some of those...??

Blue

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

For the amount of money that rifle costs I could have at least a dozen normal factory rifles and be able to scope them with decent glass. Seriously, if I had the money for a custom rifle, I would go with an Ed Brown, with his custom designed action, a stock I believe is also manufactured to his specifications, with a barrell at least as good, and with a more weather resistant finish. Plus, that would keep the money in my home state, Missouri, not far from where I do my hunting at. Seems like a no brainer to me.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

The year I got my 700, Dale Jr. was in Charlotte for a race that weekend. He came by Bass Pro in Concord on a Remington sponsor visit. It just happened to be the day I was getting my 700. He signed the stock in gold sharpie. This was before the "sticker signature" version.

For $14,000, who signs this? The Pope? The Dali Llama? Putin?

(After all these years, I still can't say that with a straight face)
"Pardon me sir, are you Putin?"
"No, that was the dog."

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from bldr52 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I am interested in reading the rest of the story. We hunters and shooters are inventive as can be in justifying our purchases, no matter whether true needs exist. Manufacturers of outdoor gear play us like fiddles and we gladly produce their kind of music. Mr. Echol's $14,000 rifles represent only a matter of degree.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gritz wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

It seems to me that the cal. of the gun does a lot of damage to the price. If this same rifle was an 06 then the 14k would be a crime. Even on run of the mill rifles, if you put it in a 405 or anything "dangerous game" qualified, someone is going to pay thousands more for it and no one would think twice about it. In my life, I could maybe afford either the trip to Africa or possibly the rifle. I would rather take the trip, take some photos from a good distance and let the lawyers and bankers keep their damned rifle. My 800 dollar rifle will due me just fine for real life scenarios. Hunt where you are. If you don't have good hunting where you are then work towards creating good hunting habitat where you are. That will leave a positive mark far greater than some trophy that you bring back from some third world country and hang on your wall. I have a friend that was given a tiger rug with complete head mount. The tiger was state of the art tax. in the 20's or 30's and is now falling apart. The species of tiger is now gone. He has to be careful who he shows it to because people are as likely to be offended as they are to appreciate it for what it is.
Put it this way, if we were starving, and a few international companies made money off of rich Africans who paid to come here and shoot our deer in our back yards so that they could put a trophy up on their walls I don't think we would appreciate it much. Just a thought that I am sure is not a popular one. I'm more of a squirrel, rabbit, deer man myself.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from wingshooter54 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

To 60256:
You wouldn't want to shoot a 7 lb. .404 Jeffrey either.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Quahog wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

....Needing a second recoil lug to inhibit splitting on the kevlar/glass stock don't speak well on McMillan lay-ups, do it?` A great trick on selling "Up" is convincing the customer that a great design is truly flawed and that your product, as proven by it's great cost alone, provides a fix.( see: Nitrous Button in your Ford Truck )

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Del,

Five or six years ago, the street value of a Savage 99 in the very common .300 Savage chambering was probably about $400 -$500 unless it was NIB or a takedown model. So you didn't do badly at all. The .250-3000 or .22 HP probably a few bucks more. That was then. A LNIB specimen is probably worth $700+ today. I recently acquired a 99F in decent condition, although the stock has been cut and a recoil pad installed (egads!), for the paltry sum of $225. Overall, it is in typical condition for a 1950's vintage rifle and shoots minute of paper plate at 100 yards with iron sights.

I think I am going to enjoy shooting it and later reblue it and put a nicer finish and new recoil pad on the stock and give it to some deserving young hunter for his first deer rifle.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I love nice walnut stocks but I think McMillan makes the toughest and best looking synthetic out there. If your hunting in rough dangerous terrain be it wet or dry the synthetic gets the nod for practicality. How that equates into the price of this gun I don't know. The Hope diamond may be embedded in the forearm. Waiting for part II.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from KJ wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I've never faced a charge from one of the white-tail deer or fox squirrels that I've hunted, so I haven't needed a "stopping rifle." I still like reading and learning about fine firearms, regardless of their price. Quality and craftsmanship come at a price.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Wa Mtnhunter,
You got a good deal. If yours is the featherweight you got a steal. It's a shame about the chop job.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from CPT BRAD wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Ok guys we've got it wrong.

I've seen DP put ridiculously overpriced guns on here before and get the same response.

He obviously does it because he;
1 Gets a kick out of stirring the pot
2 Gets a nice kickback from the gun maker for the advertising
3 Has no idea what a working man's budget is especially with the economy the way it is.

I would agree with some of the other posts, If you're going to show us a 14,000 dollar gun let's see Wyatt Earp's 45, George Patton’s Ivory handled 45s, or something that has a story behind it.
I wouldn't even compare this to one of the Booth Babes. It looks like any 400 dollar black stocked synthetic to me.

Tune in next week when we cover M-1 Abrams tanks for everyone!

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Jim in Mo,

Yes, it is the Featherweight 99F. Yes, it was a steal not just a deal! I still feel guilty about it. I don't know the fellow I got it from very well, but I asked him what he wanted for it and he asked me what will you give me. My first offer was $225, which was what I had in my pocket. He said "sold" and I took my rifle and a written bill of sale! And he threw in a Bushnell Scope Chief IV to make me feel even more guilty.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from bluegraytx wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Some of y'all need to go back and read Aesop's Fables ... you know ... the one about sour grapes.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

A couple of thoughts.

John Bolliger will craft you a super shooting rifle, and throw in a beautiful piece of wood and fabulous checkering that will put a lump in your throat and bring tears to your eyes for that kind of money.

Or, buy a Plain Jane, and spend the surplus on a plains game safari or a Rocky Mt pack trip.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ferber wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

PHs love well made Mauser actions, Model 70s and straight-shooting guns in the right hands. They don't like pumps, semi-autos, some otherwise ok non-custom bolt-guns for dangerous game because they too often don't work. Most of us can count on the fingers of one had the number of times in the field or at the bench an extractor didn't extract,the firing pin didn't hit hard enough or a shell case got stuck in the chamber.

Some legendary rifles, such as big-bore Weatherbys, aren't popular with PHs. I've never had a mal-function with my .340 but I lost a buff using mine (politically for a Weatherby magazine) and didn't have time beforehand to handload solids. A solid would have done the job, but after the 30-yard, front-on, chest shot, the PH grabbed my hand to shake as I was quickly attempting to rechamber another round. He's sorry he did that! The buff that had dropped like a stone at the shot got up and ran away. very little blood at the scene and by the end of the day tracking found that he rejoined the herd--and none of them looked sick. A few days later I took a good one using a 'proper' rifle/cartridge--.458 Model 70, 500-grain solid.

I've seen buffs killed dead with lesser gun/cartridge combinations...but there's a reason why even the .375 H&H isn't considered enough by many PHs for thick-skinned dangerous game. So, the .404 Jrffrey is a really good old cartridge for the purpose--but, Mr. Hurt's sad experience aside--14 grand for the Echols masterpiece is too dear a number to lessen the odds of a malfunction in a situation of extremis from one in thousands(?) to nil. Unless, of course, you don't have to use the laundry money to acquire one.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ChuckyDeeInNC wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Interesting reading: Kind'a reminds me of the need for a Hummer H2 debate. Some people feel they need to take the high-dollar route regardless of necessity or liklihood of a actual catastrophic failure in the field that could lead to one's death at the "hooves" of a cape buffalo. If you were that afraid of a failure of that nature you should either stay home or use a double rifle by Wesley Richards or H & H, like the PH guys use for backup.

It all boils down to personal preference and confidence the firearm (or vehicle) chosen instills in the user. If you can afford it and it gives you the "warm-fizzies", go for it! If, on the other hand, you have a growing family, mortgage payments, and impending college tuition bills----like me----you tend to lean towards the solid, good-value-for-the-money end of the spectrum. I am actually looking forward to "field-testing" one of Marlin's new short action bolt guns in the sub $400 price range for a deep woods deer rifle because the Rem Model 7, although just fantastic for that purpose, is a bit on the high side of MY budget!

To each his own. Buy and use a gun you are confident with and can shoot well.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Vic wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I use to get the magazine "This Old House" a few years back. I gave up the subscription because all the talked about were $20k doors and $2 million remodelings. I just couldn't take it. Now you have a $14k rifle. Are you kidding me? I think I would rather be eaten. Guess guys with more money than sense gotta spend it on something. Guess I am still one of the poor folk.

Vic

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from ShowMe2 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Pre-64 Winchester Model 70 African in 458. I'll take the other 12 grand and invest it in the stock market...well OK, maybe not.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Let's see, $14,000 for the rifle and $350 for one of Dave's "gotta-have" knives. If I can find my Gucci hunting boots and designer sunglasses, I'll be out the door into my new Escalade and down to the hunting club for hors d'oeuvres and some expensive single malt scotch whiskey. While there I'll feel sorry for the rest of the peasants, but not too much.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Not to be picky but how much extra to install a barrel band and rear stud for a sling?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from nc30-06 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I'll just keep my 30-06 Rem. 700. The one thing I do like about it is it is a left hand gun, but what does it matter to me, I won't/can't ever have one and I don't need a .404. Nice rifle, but I have not been "stimulated", by it or Hussein Obama.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from nc30-06 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

There is going to be a Part 11 to this? Forgot to mention the gold-plated bore?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bernie wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Echols makes a fine, reliable rifle, but it still a synthetic-stocked rifle. To my way of thinking, it is a $3,000 rifle.

If I were going to spend $14,000 on rifles, I'd buy two from Empire Rifles!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Sounds to me as if it's a dressed up plain old 70. If at l4K bucks, I would think the guy would make every part and not use another mfgers base to start with.Also, If the bolt handle is pressed to bolt, it needs a pin in the bolt to hold it. I would think he would make a bolt with the bolt handle part of the same piece of steel, so would not break offf. I got a Custom Mauser thatis beautiful Walnut in 06 and it has many of the features as this gun we talking about.It also has 3 locking lugs. Was made in Germany 20 yrs ago and shoots no better than my Custon Shop Rem 700 in 06and a 25-06 An I paid less than 2K bucks each for the 700's mounted and scoped with a Nikon Monarch/Leupold set up, it Will punch 2" holes at 200 yds all day if I can hold up. But, if you got that kind of $ to spend, so what. I just bought a PLASTIC MArlin XL7 in 270 and it looks better( looks as good as rifle in question) than most of the syn stocks on the market,even Remingtons's stuff. For a Africian hunt, I would never dream of a Bolt gun, it would be a double in some caliber and my PH would have enough additional guns between him and the gun bearers to keep me from being killed. As I ask once before, Remington bought some of the guns EAA mfgered for years, and one was a s x s dble bbl. in 30-06 and other calibers. Remington finally brought it back on the market,after trippling the price and it never sold.So now they don;t make.I sure would like one of the EAA's made in 06.Any you guys hear of one, post it please. The guns sold for less than $500.00 from EAA(wholesale) and were quality built. The left bbl has a Jack Screw to adjust the left bbl to shoot to same MOA as the right bbl.Dble trigges, sling swivels and beautiful wood as you will see on high $$$$$$ guns.Wish EAA could get the agreement returned and begin mfgering again. Ok, now we got this solved, what;s next to discuss? Me, too old to talk Women.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

All:

I'm of a mind that for $14k, the gunmaker should literally craft each rifle to perfectly fit its future owner. And by "craft" I mean the gunmaker should determine his customer's specific preferences and measurements (bolt or double or single-shot action, length of pull, RH or LH, desired overall weight, type and shape of stock, etc.), then pick up a solid chunk of high-grade steel or titanium from the metal pile, activate his computer-guided lathes, put on his goggles and gloves, and begin. And document every hour and every minute of labor he puts into actually creating a custom rifle from scratch.

But simply taking a composite material stock made by somebody else for a few hundred bucks actual cost(if that), then taking a barrel and an action, each respectively made by somebody else for a few hundred bucks actual cost (if that), then "blueprinting" the two (just how many hours of labor does this really take?) together and installing a trigger made by someone else (for a few dozens of bucks actual cost, if that), all to "build" or "manufacture" a rifle that won't shoot any better, handle any better, be more reliable, or last any longer than a high-grade Kimber, yet costs about $12.5 more . . . smacks of utter foolishness.

Give me the Kimber instead. Or, if I don't mind waiting a couple of months, I can go to my local P.O. Ackley-trained gunsmith, give him a Model 70 or Model 700 action, tell him what I want, answer his acutely intelligent, born-of-experience questions, and 6-8 weeks and maybe $1000 later, I'll have a rifle that will do anything the "Legend" will do, just as well, just as reliably, and just as accurately, for at least my lifetime. $14k? For a "Legend" better known for its real title of . . . "Foolishness."

TWD

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

RWD: I agree with you 100 %. I touched on remarks afew spaces above yours. If going to spend l4K for a custom built gun, I want every piece hand made. My gun smith has all the equiptment to make any gun you may desire from scratch, buys nothing,other than springs if needed. I'm not a Marlin fan yet, howevr I did buy one of the new MArlin XL7's a cheaper introduction into hunting and was suprised at the workmanship and quality of what I see. The stock is Syn,but no grove to be seen,( the stock is not 2 pieces of plastic glued together) the stock is smooth molded as silk and has a straight stock and cheek piece. The Bbl is button rifled, and the bolt is fluted. Has a new type trigger, kinda like Savages, but not. My only complaint is the light weight overall and not available in Walnut and a 22" bbl rather than a 24".But for less than 350.00 bucks(gun only) what can you expect in todays market place. As I stated above I use 700's to hunt, but wanted to try a 270 on W-tails and needed a syn stocked gun for my 4 wheeler and truck as the scrathes on Walnut I do not like. I've used a wet cloth and wife's Iron many times to get a dent out. Love and enjoy beautiful wood. On the MArlin I added 2 lbs of wt to the Butt end wrapped in Foam rubber and with the Nikon scope and Leupold set up its about 9 l/4 lbs, just right for me. Anyway, total I got less than 900.00 in the somplete gun and will shoot 2" groups at 200 yds if I can hold it still. At 73+ kinda hard some times. Do plan to take it to C0/or WY this fall if draw and we got almost 2 months of Deer season here and will hunt a lot here using my 4 wheeler. So will keep all informed on my success. BAck to Custom guns, I think you hit the nail correct. Sounds to me as if the gun in question is something the average gun owner( plus gun knowledge) could buy from Brownells and assemble himself, agree? Repeating my-self on some items, but what better way to chat with other hunters . Shoot-um-straight and very often. One last item,I can;t figure out what in the world he could do to a standard Action, stock,bbl to cost l4K bucks? Can you guys. THat is not a custom gun in my book.I'd like to sell my custom Mauser for that kinda $ and my gun has the most beautiful wood ever seen and 3 locking lugs.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

no way that rifle is worth 14,000! i don't care who built it. and if someone wants to try to rip us for that kind of money they had better find a better looking, expensive wood stock to put on it! mr. echols is seriously flawed in his thinking if he thinks a synthetic firearm is worth that much money. he should go hang out with his way too rich friends and dave needs to show us firearms that are realistic to the everyday people on this blog. that rifle isn't even pretty!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Yeah Dave... if it's that damn high it needs to be pretty. Just like women. Function is great but I see a serious problem here with going waaaayyyy beyond the point of diminishing returns.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

And speaking of diminishing returns how about that market? I could have pulled out and got some of those 1% CD's six months ago and had two of these ridiculously overpriced rifles and a f-ing Harley Davidson at the house and MORE MONEY!!! We need a bloated government rant bad... spending our way to prosperity is a lot like trickle up poverty.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Not a good day sorry.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

At least your back. We were organizing a seach party, planning on checking out moonshine locations first.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I actually have to work a lot more now... sucks.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

To Del in KS,
I'd go with a Savage "Package Deal" in 30-06. Great price, great cartrage, great rifle, and ammo easier to find.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I'm sure Kenny Jarrett would build you one alot cheaper, and you would be able to shoot the eye lashes off a "cape" at a 1000yds. too

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Dr. RAlph: Agree 100% on the CD's. I also should have pulled out my hunting account CD's and bought that Hunting Cabin and 25 A of land in Colorado for l/2 of what I've lost in past yr on the MArket. At least I would have the Cabin/land to say was mine, now the loss on the DOW all I can do is kick my own A-- for not seeing the handwriting on the wall.Or, if did not want teh property, just buried teh $$ and gone hunting till I die. At 73+ few hunts remaining. But I blame my Investment Councelor, he screwed me a Royal. Will be interesting to see what this week does to DOW. But willnever come back to l4k as was in Nov. 2007 and CD rates in the 90's of 8-10%. Wan't get into a no-win discussion on why we lost so much,but all you guys can read and see as well as I. Hope the person responsible, enjoyes his retirement in Texas.Shoot-um-Straight and often. Hey are you a MD? of what type Dr.?I need some Doctors input about some RX's.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Gunslinger

Sure the DJIA will be back to 14,000 points. Just that the dollars it represents will be worth about 10 cents on the dollar. You'll need a wheelbarrow to carry enough money to buy groceries.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from nate616 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

No Gun is worth $14,000 !!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Andrew Ferraro wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

$14,000 for unfitted, plastic stock? Is this a product placement? I sure hope so.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I guess if you have the $ more power to you. Any rifle over 600 starts to seem expensive to me. I guess if you are planning on facing charging lions and such on the plains of Africa, then you should spend what you can afford on a ultra reliable boom stick.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I guess if you have the $ more power to you. Any rifle over 600 starts to seem expensive to me. I guess if you are planning on facing charging lions and such on the plains of Africa, then you should spend what you can afford on a ultra reliable boom stick.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Dave, I was thinking of the fed. 215, isn't the CCI primer finickey to load?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Sorry gunslinger, not a doctor... hell I'm not even a Ralph!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

OK DOC. Assume you were a Dr. but that's what one gets for assuming. I wish I was a true Gunslinger also, but do sling many guns over my shoulder come hunt time. Always wanted to be a Cowboy and a real Gunslinger. Supose that's why I chose that title. Carrying a Concealed at my age does give me a little peace of mind, beging handicapped, a pocket gun or holster does give me a tad of security. With todays crooks running wild, never know when gonna need to protect yourself. So I've eithe got a Kel-tec 380 in my pocket or a Uberti 44-40 in my Holster. If on my 4 wheeler, will be a rifle as well, as my hunting area is far off the beaten path and poachers abound on it. Shoot-um-straight and often.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

9 pounds is a little much. And even though it is very well built... its pricey... a more money than anybody is willing to spend in times like these. It sounds like a nice custom gun but really? $14,000?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from HillbillyDeluxe wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

1 gun: $1,200-1,400
10 guns: $12,000-14,000

or

1 gun: $14,000

Hard decision.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hjohn429 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

You could get 15 Marlin XLR's in 444 Marlin for the same price. Why not just get a double barrel 500 NE and still be able to afford ammo?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from evspence wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

2,100 fps!?!?! 400 grains!?!?!? Why not spend 1K on a rifle in the same calliber and spend the rest on hiring somebody to shoot it for you?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Fisher Boy wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

little expensive for this economy, if one comes along, it can sit on the shelf, or go along

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Jeff4066 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Now, presented as an engineering, or a history class, that is very interesting. I like stories about masters of their craft who can make such fine machinery.

But to imply that it is, under any remotely believable circumstances at all, necessary, or worthy of a year-and-a-half of my mortgage is inconceivable. (got that word from "The Princess Bride")

Before I get yelled at, give me a chance. I love nice engraving. I like fancy metal trim. But I am logical enough to realize that nobody I have ever known, read, seen, or heard has said; "Boy, that gun shot like crap until I got it engraved, now I hit dimes at 800 yards.".

So while this is a miracle of highly skilled labor, I fail to see any improvement that justifies the extra $12,000. An off-the-shelf action is still at the heart, that. You remain at the mercy of the suppliers and milling of that steel.

And before you say that engraving compared to mechanical changes is bogus, let me say that might not have been the best example. I was (I think) also trying to imply that the reason people spend such heinous amounts of money on what is at heart a standard action could be mental. (Not as in ill, but of the mind). I have known people who shot better with expensive rifles not really better than one they had simply because they thought they would. Maybe confidence helped. I have a fancy rifle, ergo; I will shot better. But I also had a few friends I didn't want to be in the same county with, even with one of these.

Last time I was out with my nephew, I put 3 rounds in a red dot about the size of a dime. I was using a 700, .30-06, with a plain Bushnell Banner scope. The range was 140 yards. The target used was one of the .pdf files from the Remington site; the one with the small red-dot bull.

So with this rifle, and my current skill, it is implied that for a mere $13,000 more than I spent, I can push this out a few more yards?

As for the safety enhancements, we all risk our lives more on the highways every single day than we ever would in a one-in-a-billion odds failure.

So as an example of skill, thank you. But some of us love your articles on things, like, the ones on Mossbergs the other day, or North American game, or something I might go to Bass pro and actually buy, rather than something You would fly your private jet to Egypt to pay a ransom for.

I apologize. I have quit reading others because it just got so out of touch with "us folk" there wasn't anything to learn. There are many fine contributors (and writers) here. More for us commoners, please.

+12 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

All for only 14K. Hum... Montana Rifle Works can put someting similar (their M1999 Improved Win Action) with their own barrel (while not a Kreiger, still good) together for about $1,400 - $1,600. Bet the Dagga Boy wouldn't know the difference.

But what the heck... If you have the cash for the 15K safari why not a 14K rifle?

If I sound bitter Dave, it's because I am...

+9 Good Comment? | | Report
from Vic wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I use to get the magazine "This Old House" a few years back. I gave up the subscription because all the talked about were $20k doors and $2 million remodelings. I just couldn't take it. Now you have a $14k rifle. Are you kidding me? I think I would rather be eaten. Guess guys with more money than sense gotta spend it on something. Guess I am still one of the poor folk.

Vic

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

I guess the Mossberg article was just too much for Mr. Petzal to bear.

Jim

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from s-kfry wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

I look at the law of diminishing returns. For $14 grand there is a lot of hunting I can do right here with the Savage I already have. Heck, for $14k I could pick up a cheaper gun and go to Alaska for caribou and grizzly. Sorry, call me cheap but it just isn’t worth it though I can value the craftsmanship.

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

African Safari $15,000

PH Tip $1,000

Hospitalization $30,000
and medevac flight
after being charged
by Dagga Boy

Rifle that works: PRICELESS

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Guy's maybe we all have this Mr. Echols wrong. He is obviously a very talented and highly skilled craftsman, and after some thought I believe that high level of skill equates well with his business sense.

He has this thing all figured out. You get overly wealthy magazine editors to buy your rifles for $10,000 to $20,000 each. Subsequently he has to produce fewer and doesn't need to work as hard. Less wear and tear on the eyes and other essential equipment. He also doesn't have to constantly reinvent himself nor his product. That my friends is efficiency at its finest...

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I bet every one of us felt really good after reading this item. We've all got hunting rifles. I bet we all really like our rifles. Not one of us paid, maybe, ten per cent of what that rifle cost. Hell, we can all feel good! We've got at something probably as good for our hunting needs, and we've all saved $12,000.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from CPT BRAD wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Ok guys we've got it wrong.

I've seen DP put ridiculously overpriced guns on here before and get the same response.

He obviously does it because he;
1 Gets a kick out of stirring the pot
2 Gets a nice kickback from the gun maker for the advertising
3 Has no idea what a working man's budget is especially with the economy the way it is.

I would agree with some of the other posts, If you're going to show us a 14,000 dollar gun let's see Wyatt Earp's 45, George Patton’s Ivory handled 45s, or something that has a story behind it.
I wouldn't even compare this to one of the Booth Babes. It looks like any 400 dollar black stocked synthetic to me.

Tune in next week when we cover M-1 Abrams tanks for everyone!

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Thanks Guys, another weapon that's fine to look at but who the hell could AFFORD IT !!! You can get an over the counter gun in the some caliber for about 1/10 that price.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I'd rather buy a standard Remington model 700 and good scope. Then after I'm done splurging on one of the finest guns ever made I'd still have enough money left over to make around 9 or 10 house payments and buy ammo.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

You could get a really accurate, reliable, good-looking, walnut-stocked, over-the-counter rifle for 1/10 the price.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Dave,

My friend has $500 bucks and wants a first deer rifle. Can you come up with a better idea than a Marlin bolt gun with a 4X scope and Leupold rings in 25-06 for a newby deer hunter?

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

no way that rifle is worth 14,000! i don't care who built it. and if someone wants to try to rip us for that kind of money they had better find a better looking, expensive wood stock to put on it! mr. echols is seriously flawed in his thinking if he thinks a synthetic firearm is worth that much money. he should go hang out with his way too rich friends and dave needs to show us firearms that are realistic to the everyday people on this blog. that rifle isn't even pretty!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

For 14k I would insist on nothing less than an intricately carved 11,000 year old Mammoth Ivory Manlicher stock pulled from Siberian permafrost with gold damascining and niello, flawless Ceylon rubies in the front and back sights, platinum double set triggers on a perfect button rifled Damascus steel barrel as well as an Alpaca lined guncase made of Komodo Dragon leather with sterling silver fittings.
Kinda like the wheelock rifles used by Nobles of the Holy Roman Empire in the 16th century yo see in the Metropolitan museum of art, but modern...
Heck we could put the extension on the farmhouse for that kinda money!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

The year I got my 700, Dale Jr. was in Charlotte for a race that weekend. He came by Bass Pro in Concord on a Remington sponsor visit. It just happened to be the day I was getting my 700. He signed the stock in gold sharpie. This was before the "sticker signature" version.

For $14,000, who signs this? The Pope? The Dali Llama? Putin?

(After all these years, I still can't say that with a straight face)
"Pardon me sir, are you Putin?"
"No, that was the dog."

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

To KJ: A second recoil lug has no effect on accuracy either way, but it's a very good means of keeping the stock from splitting.

To Beekeeper: Don't be bitter. It will cause you to age prematurely.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Yeah Del, same gun only in 30-06 that way he could hunt black bear, northern whitetails and elk not just little goats.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Hey Guys,

Send me $12000 and I'll pin the bolt, bed the barrel and weld on an extra recoil lug on TWO of your favorite rifles! All told, you'll have two rifles at the price of one!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Del

I'm not Dave, but my 2 cents for a first deer rifle would be a nice Savage (or Stevens 200) model 10 series in .308 Winchester with a decent Nikon or Sightron scope if he has to have "new". My son's first deer rifle is a Savage 99F that he paid $175 for with a Swift 4x scope in Weaver rings. Of course you can't get one for $175 in decent shape anymore, but I think you might find one for $400 in good condition. We have both killed deer with it and he still uses it these past 14 years. He leaves the Big 7 at home when hunting deer. It has even killed elk. Imagine, a .308 elk killer! The other part is that the Savage 99 will be worth more than he paid for it real soon while it's not likely with the Marlin or Savage 110.

If he's recoil shy, get a Savage 99 in .300 Savage. I have one and it shoots real nice. Ammo is a little more expensive, but I handload so I don't care.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

YooperJack, you nailed that one spot on!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Not to be picky but how much extra to install a barrel band and rear stud for a sling?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Did someone say that ugly thing is pretty? They want 14K and it's one rain shower from rusty. If it's supposed to be tough you'd think they would at least Weatherproof it. Rest assured I could hit the powerball (but I don't gamble) and still would not pay for one of those. He could buy a Kimber and have it Cerakoted for about $1250. It would be almost as pretty as Eliza what's 'er name, would still get the job done and you would be $12,750 better off. Wonder if the feller felt any change hit him in the a$$ as he left that gun shop.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Remember that old thread about guns you wish you had kept. Well I once had a pre-war mdl 99 in 300 Savage that looked brand new. Left to me by a relative. Not a fan of those and sold it for 400 bucks 5 yr ago. Wonder what it was really worth.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I have been impressed with D'arcy and his rifles for years and years. I have even handled a few of the rifles. Nice guns but my local gunsmith can create an equal weapon for about one quarter to one third the price even to the point of all the little intricate details that Echols does to the latter day Winchester actions. Heck he will even put the scope on if you're too lazy plus sight it in so you only have to fine tune it to suit yourself.
Actually I think Dave wrote this blog just to see if he could get more responses to it than the .270 vs .30-'06 post. He knows what sets us off. Probably laughing his a$$ off.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from KJ wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I've never faced a charge from one of the white-tail deer or fox squirrels that I've hunted, so I haven't needed a "stopping rifle." I still like reading and learning about fine firearms, regardless of their price. Quality and craftsmanship come at a price.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from nc30-06 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I'll just keep my 30-06 Rem. 700. The one thing I do like about it is it is a left hand gun, but what does it matter to me, I won't/can't ever have one and I don't need a .404. Nice rifle, but I have not been "stimulated", by it or Hussein Obama.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from nc30-06 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

There is going to be a Part 11 to this? Forgot to mention the gold-plated bore?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from 60256 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

I wouldn't want to be carrying around a nine pound gun. Mine's only 7.

Nate

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

All:

I'm of a mind that for $14k, the gunmaker should literally craft each rifle to perfectly fit its future owner. And by "craft" I mean the gunmaker should determine his customer's specific preferences and measurements (bolt or double or single-shot action, length of pull, RH or LH, desired overall weight, type and shape of stock, etc.), then pick up a solid chunk of high-grade steel or titanium from the metal pile, activate his computer-guided lathes, put on his goggles and gloves, and begin. And document every hour and every minute of labor he puts into actually creating a custom rifle from scratch.

But simply taking a composite material stock made by somebody else for a few hundred bucks actual cost(if that), then taking a barrel and an action, each respectively made by somebody else for a few hundred bucks actual cost (if that), then "blueprinting" the two (just how many hours of labor does this really take?) together and installing a trigger made by someone else (for a few dozens of bucks actual cost, if that), all to "build" or "manufacture" a rifle that won't shoot any better, handle any better, be more reliable, or last any longer than a high-grade Kimber, yet costs about $12.5 more . . . smacks of utter foolishness.

Give me the Kimber instead. Or, if I don't mind waiting a couple of months, I can go to my local P.O. Ackley-trained gunsmith, give him a Model 70 or Model 700 action, tell him what I want, answer his acutely intelligent, born-of-experience questions, and 6-8 weeks and maybe $1000 later, I'll have a rifle that will do anything the "Legend" will do, just as well, just as reliably, and just as accurately, for at least my lifetime. $14k? For a "Legend" better known for its real title of . . . "Foolishness."

TWD

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from bluegraytx wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Some of y'all need to go back and read Aesop's Fables ... you know ... the one about sour grapes.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

A couple of thoughts.

John Bolliger will craft you a super shooting rifle, and throw in a beautiful piece of wood and fabulous checkering that will put a lump in your throat and bring tears to your eyes for that kind of money.

Or, buy a Plain Jane, and spend the surplus on a plains game safari or a Rocky Mt pack trip.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Let's see, $14,000 for the rifle and $350 for one of Dave's "gotta-have" knives. If I can find my Gucci hunting boots and designer sunglasses, I'll be out the door into my new Escalade and down to the hunting club for hors d'oeuvres and some expensive single malt scotch whiskey. While there I'll feel sorry for the rest of the peasants, but not too much.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Quahog wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

....Needing a second recoil lug to inhibit splitting on the kevlar/glass stock don't speak well on McMillan lay-ups, do it?` A great trick on selling "Up" is convincing the customer that a great design is truly flawed and that your product, as proven by it's great cost alone, provides a fix.( see: Nitrous Button in your Ford Truck )

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Andrew Ferraro wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

$14,000 for unfitted, plastic stock? Is this a product placement? I sure hope so.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Shootstir wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

At a net value of $97.22/ounce...you could have an entire gun carved from pure Silver for your one-of-a-kind gun collections, and still have enough money left over to purchase that fine Krieghoff you've been drooling over- or that mint condition Holland & Holland .404 Jeffrey (the real thing, not a copy).

What's the saying? "A fool and his money are soon parted."

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ShowMe2 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Pre-64 Winchester Model 70 African in 458. I'll take the other 12 grand and invest it in the stock market...well OK, maybe not.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gritz wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

It seems to me that the cal. of the gun does a lot of damage to the price. If this same rifle was an 06 then the 14k would be a crime. Even on run of the mill rifles, if you put it in a 405 or anything "dangerous game" qualified, someone is going to pay thousands more for it and no one would think twice about it. In my life, I could maybe afford either the trip to Africa or possibly the rifle. I would rather take the trip, take some photos from a good distance and let the lawyers and bankers keep their damned rifle. My 800 dollar rifle will due me just fine for real life scenarios. Hunt where you are. If you don't have good hunting where you are then work towards creating good hunting habitat where you are. That will leave a positive mark far greater than some trophy that you bring back from some third world country and hang on your wall. I have a friend that was given a tiger rug with complete head mount. The tiger was state of the art tax. in the 20's or 30's and is now falling apart. The species of tiger is now gone. He has to be careful who he shows it to because people are as likely to be offended as they are to appreciate it for what it is.
Put it this way, if we were starving, and a few international companies made money off of rich Africans who paid to come here and shoot our deer in our back yards so that they could put a trophy up on their walls I don't think we would appreciate it much. Just a thought that I am sure is not a popular one. I'm more of a squirrel, rabbit, deer man myself.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from nate616 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

No Gun is worth $14,000 !!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from idduckhntr wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

who cares what it weighs I have not seen a synthetic gun worth $14000,now if it xxx walnut the we'll talk.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

guns for yuppies, great

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

To Del in KS,
I'd go with a Savage "Package Deal" in 30-06. Great price, great cartrage, great rifle, and ammo easier to find.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I'm sure Kenny Jarrett would build you one alot cheaper, and you would be able to shoot the eye lashes off a "cape" at a 1000yds. too

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from DrKarupt wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

14,000.00 for a plastic stocked Rifle! The only place that would happen is in his own mind! Whatever happened to the pride you felt and the warmth of a walnut stock? Who ever has that kind of money is welcome to spend it however they wish, I guess. And yes, I do mean plastic, all the word "synthetic" means is "man made".

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ChuckyDeeInNC wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Interesting reading: Kind'a reminds me of the need for a Hummer H2 debate. Some people feel they need to take the high-dollar route regardless of necessity or liklihood of a actual catastrophic failure in the field that could lead to one's death at the "hooves" of a cape buffalo. If you were that afraid of a failure of that nature you should either stay home or use a double rifle by Wesley Richards or H & H, like the PH guys use for backup.

It all boils down to personal preference and confidence the firearm (or vehicle) chosen instills in the user. If you can afford it and it gives you the "warm-fizzies", go for it! If, on the other hand, you have a growing family, mortgage payments, and impending college tuition bills----like me----you tend to lean towards the solid, good-value-for-the-money end of the spectrum. I am actually looking forward to "field-testing" one of Marlin's new short action bolt guns in the sub $400 price range for a deep woods deer rifle because the Rem Model 7, although just fantastic for that purpose, is a bit on the high side of MY budget!

To each his own. Buy and use a gun you are confident with and can shoot well.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from streack wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

This gun sounds like a marvel of modern engineering. What surprises me is that based on the picture the gun looks normal, but the old saying, don't judge a book by its cover, certainly applies to this situation.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Del,

Five or six years ago, the street value of a Savage 99 in the very common .300 Savage chambering was probably about $400 -$500 unless it was NIB or a takedown model. So you didn't do badly at all. The .250-3000 or .22 HP probably a few bucks more. That was then. A LNIB specimen is probably worth $700+ today. I recently acquired a 99F in decent condition, although the stock has been cut and a recoil pad installed (egads!), for the paltry sum of $225. Overall, it is in typical condition for a 1950's vintage rifle and shoots minute of paper plate at 100 yards with iron sights.

I think I am going to enjoy shooting it and later reblue it and put a nicer finish and new recoil pad on the stock and give it to some deserving young hunter for his first deer rifle.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Jim in Mo,

Yes, it is the Featherweight 99F. Yes, it was a steal not just a deal! I still feel guilty about it. I don't know the fellow I got it from very well, but I asked him what he wanted for it and he asked me what will you give me. My first offer was $225, which was what I had in my pocket. He said "sold" and I took my rifle and a written bill of sale! And he threw in a Bushnell Scope Chief IV to make me feel even more guilty.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Gunslinger

Sure the DJIA will be back to 14,000 points. Just that the dollars it represents will be worth about 10 cents on the dollar. You'll need a wheelbarrow to carry enough money to buy groceries.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I love nice walnut stocks but I think McMillan makes the toughest and best looking synthetic out there. If your hunting in rough dangerous terrain be it wet or dry the synthetic gets the nod for practicality. How that equates into the price of this gun I don't know. The Hope diamond may be embedded in the forearm. Waiting for part II.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Wa Mtnhunter,
You got a good deal. If yours is the featherweight you got a steal. It's a shame about the chop job.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

At least your back. We were organizing a seach party, planning on checking out moonshine locations first.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Dave, I was thinking of the fed. 215, isn't the CCI primer finickey to load?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Yeah Dave... if it's that damn high it needs to be pretty. Just like women. Function is great but I see a serious problem here with going waaaayyyy beyond the point of diminishing returns.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

And speaking of diminishing returns how about that market? I could have pulled out and got some of those 1% CD's six months ago and had two of these ridiculously overpriced rifles and a f-ing Harley Davidson at the house and MORE MONEY!!! We need a bloated government rant bad... spending our way to prosperity is a lot like trickle up poverty.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Not a good day sorry.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I actually have to work a lot more now... sucks.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Sorry gunslinger, not a doctor... hell I'm not even a Ralph!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from KJ wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Would a second recoil lug have any effect, positive or negative, on accuracy?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bernie wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Echols makes a fine, reliable rifle, but it still a synthetic-stocked rifle. To my way of thinking, it is a $3,000 rifle.

If I were going to spend $14,000 on rifles, I'd buy two from Empire Rifles!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from HillbillyDeluxe wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

1 gun: $1,200-1,400
10 guns: $12,000-14,000

or

1 gun: $14,000

Hard decision.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Echols’ dangerous game rifles sound as if they are “finished” although in the photo this 404 Jeffrey doesn’t appear to have express sights. I have two “dangerous game” rifles that I put considerable labor in to modify and enhance. One is a Winchester 70 458 and other is a 35 Whelen I built on a Mauser action. The Winchester is a pretty good product straight from the factory, but the action needed to smoothed up and drag eliminated. I was shocked to see this model 70’s feed ramp wasn’t polished. My Mauser I did a bunch of metal work to true and polish the action to eliminate drag..and I did the stock work.

These are very time consuming labors of love. I can see where having this work done by a custom rifle smith jacks up the price of the rifle.

BTW 60256 a 7-lbs heavy rifle doesn't sound like something I'd like to shoot.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from spuddog wrote 2 years 48 weeks ago

Hey guys, if I can't afford this gun can I just take my .270 win on the safari?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from azduane wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I love it. If I could afford something like this then I would be hunting in more exotic places that I can right now and after some real "bada@@" animals that bite, gore, etc. back.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from wingshooter54 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

To 60256:
You wouldn't want to shoot a 7 lb. .404 Jeffrey either.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Sounds to me as if it's a dressed up plain old 70. If at l4K bucks, I would think the guy would make every part and not use another mfgers base to start with.Also, If the bolt handle is pressed to bolt, it needs a pin in the bolt to hold it. I would think he would make a bolt with the bolt handle part of the same piece of steel, so would not break offf. I got a Custom Mauser thatis beautiful Walnut in 06 and it has many of the features as this gun we talking about.It also has 3 locking lugs. Was made in Germany 20 yrs ago and shoots no better than my Custon Shop Rem 700 in 06and a 25-06 An I paid less than 2K bucks each for the 700's mounted and scoped with a Nikon Monarch/Leupold set up, it Will punch 2" holes at 200 yds all day if I can hold up. But, if you got that kind of $ to spend, so what. I just bought a PLASTIC MArlin XL7 in 270 and it looks better( looks as good as rifle in question) than most of the syn stocks on the market,even Remingtons's stuff. For a Africian hunt, I would never dream of a Bolt gun, it would be a double in some caliber and my PH would have enough additional guns between him and the gun bearers to keep me from being killed. As I ask once before, Remington bought some of the guns EAA mfgered for years, and one was a s x s dble bbl. in 30-06 and other calibers. Remington finally brought it back on the market,after trippling the price and it never sold.So now they don;t make.I sure would like one of the EAA's made in 06.Any you guys hear of one, post it please. The guns sold for less than $500.00 from EAA(wholesale) and were quality built. The left bbl has a Jack Screw to adjust the left bbl to shoot to same MOA as the right bbl.Dble trigges, sling swivels and beautiful wood as you will see on high $$$$$$ guns.Wish EAA could get the agreement returned and begin mfgering again. Ok, now we got this solved, what;s next to discuss? Me, too old to talk Women.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

RWD: I agree with you 100 %. I touched on remarks afew spaces above yours. If going to spend l4K for a custom built gun, I want every piece hand made. My gun smith has all the equiptment to make any gun you may desire from scratch, buys nothing,other than springs if needed. I'm not a Marlin fan yet, howevr I did buy one of the new MArlin XL7's a cheaper introduction into hunting and was suprised at the workmanship and quality of what I see. The stock is Syn,but no grove to be seen,( the stock is not 2 pieces of plastic glued together) the stock is smooth molded as silk and has a straight stock and cheek piece. The Bbl is button rifled, and the bolt is fluted. Has a new type trigger, kinda like Savages, but not. My only complaint is the light weight overall and not available in Walnut and a 22" bbl rather than a 24".But for less than 350.00 bucks(gun only) what can you expect in todays market place. As I stated above I use 700's to hunt, but wanted to try a 270 on W-tails and needed a syn stocked gun for my 4 wheeler and truck as the scrathes on Walnut I do not like. I've used a wet cloth and wife's Iron many times to get a dent out. Love and enjoy beautiful wood. On the MArlin I added 2 lbs of wt to the Butt end wrapped in Foam rubber and with the Nikon scope and Leupold set up its about 9 l/4 lbs, just right for me. Anyway, total I got less than 900.00 in the somplete gun and will shoot 2" groups at 200 yds if I can hold it still. At 73+ kinda hard some times. Do plan to take it to C0/or WY this fall if draw and we got almost 2 months of Deer season here and will hunt a lot here using my 4 wheeler. So will keep all informed on my success. BAck to Custom guns, I think you hit the nail correct. Sounds to me as if the gun in question is something the average gun owner( plus gun knowledge) could buy from Brownells and assemble himself, agree? Repeating my-self on some items, but what better way to chat with other hunters . Shoot-um-straight and very often. One last item,I can;t figure out what in the world he could do to a standard Action, stock,bbl to cost l4K bucks? Can you guys. THat is not a custom gun in my book.I'd like to sell my custom Mauser for that kinda $ and my gun has the most beautiful wood ever seen and 3 locking lugs.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Dr. RAlph: Agree 100% on the CD's. I also should have pulled out my hunting account CD's and bought that Hunting Cabin and 25 A of land in Colorado for l/2 of what I've lost in past yr on the MArket. At least I would have the Cabin/land to say was mine, now the loss on the DOW all I can do is kick my own A-- for not seeing the handwriting on the wall.Or, if did not want teh property, just buried teh $$ and gone hunting till I die. At 73+ few hunts remaining. But I blame my Investment Councelor, he screwed me a Royal. Will be interesting to see what this week does to DOW. But willnever come back to l4k as was in Nov. 2007 and CD rates in the 90's of 8-10%. Wan't get into a no-win discussion on why we lost so much,but all you guys can read and see as well as I. Hope the person responsible, enjoyes his retirement in Texas.Shoot-um-Straight and often. Hey are you a MD? of what type Dr.?I need some Doctors input about some RX's.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

For the amount of money that rifle costs I could have at least a dozen normal factory rifles and be able to scope them with decent glass. Seriously, if I had the money for a custom rifle, I would go with an Ed Brown, with his custom designed action, a stock I believe is also manufactured to his specifications, with a barrell at least as good, and with a more weather resistant finish. Plus, that would keep the money in my home state, Missouri, not far from where I do my hunting at. Seems like a no brainer to me.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Daniel Boone is said to have looked at a pioneer's ugly rifle and said something to the effect, "Thy rifle hath great power, but is exceedingly plain."

This focus on plastic stocked rifles is much the same. Only pretty booth babes are interesting...and, only handsome rifles, or historical rifles, may catch our eye. Can we see some of those...??

Blue

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I guess if you have the $ more power to you. Any rifle over 600 starts to seem expensive to me. I guess if you are planning on facing charging lions and such on the plains of Africa, then you should spend what you can afford on a ultra reliable boom stick.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I guess if you have the $ more power to you. Any rifle over 600 starts to seem expensive to me. I guess if you are planning on facing charging lions and such on the plains of Africa, then you should spend what you can afford on a ultra reliable boom stick.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Now this is one expensive gun. Period. I wonder(around in circles) why Dave feeds us this expensive sort of gun diet? Anyway, it does seem like a strongly built rifle, but I agree that for the $$$ I would like to see some very pretty wood on it! By the way, most bolt guns have been doing the job well, in large safari calibers, for years. Are all the beefy upgrades really necessary? I guess if I could afford it; I would buy it just for conversation sake!I guess???

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from The Armchair Ou... wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

Custom rifles in magazines are like centerfold models. Most of us will never have one, but we still like to look at them. Go figure.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

9 pounds is a little much. And even though it is very well built... its pricey... a more money than anybody is willing to spend in times like these. It sounds like a nice custom gun but really? $14,000?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from bldr52 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

I am interested in reading the rest of the story. We hunters and shooters are inventive as can be in justifying our purchases, no matter whether true needs exist. Manufacturers of outdoor gear play us like fiddles and we gladly produce their kind of music. Mr. Echol's $14,000 rifles represent only a matter of degree.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ferber wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

PHs love well made Mauser actions, Model 70s and straight-shooting guns in the right hands. They don't like pumps, semi-autos, some otherwise ok non-custom bolt-guns for dangerous game because they too often don't work. Most of us can count on the fingers of one had the number of times in the field or at the bench an extractor didn't extract,the firing pin didn't hit hard enough or a shell case got stuck in the chamber.

Some legendary rifles, such as big-bore Weatherbys, aren't popular with PHs. I've never had a mal-function with my .340 but I lost a buff using mine (politically for a Weatherby magazine) and didn't have time beforehand to handload solids. A solid would have done the job, but after the 30-yard, front-on, chest shot, the PH grabbed my hand to shake as I was quickly attempting to rechamber another round. He's sorry he did that! The buff that had dropped like a stone at the shot got up and ran away. very little blood at the scene and by the end of the day tracking found that he rejoined the herd--and none of them looked sick. A few days later I took a good one using a 'proper' rifle/cartridge--.458 Model 70, 500-grain solid.

I've seen buffs killed dead with lesser gun/cartridge combinations...but there's a reason why even the .375 H&H isn't considered enough by many PHs for thick-skinned dangerous game. So, the .404 Jrffrey is a really good old cartridge for the purpose--but, Mr. Hurt's sad experience aside--14 grand for the Echols masterpiece is too dear a number to lessen the odds of a malfunction in a situation of extremis from one in thousands(?) to nil. Unless, of course, you don't have to use the laundry money to acquire one.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

OK DOC. Assume you were a Dr. but that's what one gets for assuming. I wish I was a true Gunslinger also, but do sling many guns over my shoulder come hunt time. Always wanted to be a Cowboy and a real Gunslinger. Supose that's why I chose that title. Carrying a Concealed at my age does give me a little peace of mind, beging handicapped, a pocket gun or holster does give me a tad of security. With todays crooks running wild, never know when gonna need to protect yourself. So I've eithe got a Kel-tec 380 in my pocket or a Uberti 44-40 in my Holster. If on my 4 wheeler, will be a rifle as well, as my hunting area is far off the beaten path and poachers abound on it. Shoot-um-straight and often.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Fisher Boy wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

little expensive for this economy, if one comes along, it can sit on the shelf, or go along

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from evspence wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

2,100 fps!?!?! 400 grains!?!?!? Why not spend 1K on a rifle in the same calliber and spend the rest on hiring somebody to shoot it for you?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hjohn429 wrote 2 years 47 weeks ago

You could get 15 Marlin XLR's in 444 Marlin for the same price. Why not just get a double barrel 500 NE and still be able to afford ammo?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs