


March 16, 2009
Mr. Echols' Legend, Explained (Part II)
By David E. Petzal

There are, altogether, probably 100 separate steps that go into a Legend from start to finish, and I can’t possibly cover them in the piddling space allowed me here. But here are the basics:
1. The trigger is adjusted and re-pinned to eliminate slop
2. The action is trued up
3. The feed ramp and rails are modified to fit the cartridge
4. The ejection port is lengthened to 3.600
5. A spring-steel extractor replaces the factory extractor
6. The factory magazine box is replaced by a heat-treated stainless-steel box that allows four magnum cartridges in the magazine well without the use of a “dropped” magazine
7. The factory follower is replaced by a stainless-steel one of Echols’ design which has “Hold Four Cartridges” engraved on it in case you have a lot of money but are still fairly simple.
8. Echols builds his own scope mounts, and re-drills and taps the factory base holes for 8/40 screws.
9. The completed rifle is tested for function, and handloads are worked up for it. Then it goes out the door.
When you buy a custom rifle, you are buying a piece of engineering, and you can judge that by asking what is the rifle’s job, and how successfully does it do that job? In the case of a heavy rifle like this, it is to put as many heavy bullets as possible in a reasonably close group on a large target at close range in the minimum amount of time with complete reliability.
At 100 yards, the Legend groups averaged 1.3 inches. That includes Hornady factory soft-points and solids and handloads using Barnes hollow-points and solids. That kind of accuracy in a rifle like this is, pardon the expression, overkill.

(To be continued).
Comments (80)
At $14,000.oo, That kind of accurracy is not overkill. I get that from my Savage. I'm sure these guns are well made and well engineered, but hardly relevant to 99.9% of hunters.
This rifle's claim to accuracy is only 1.3 MOA using handloads? For $14K? Is that sort of inaccuracy a common limitation of the cartridge for which the rifle is chambered?
This is a dangerous game gun in a dangerous game caliber. Good luck getting MOA with one of those.
All you need is MOCCB accuracy -
Minute of Charging Cape Buffalo.
If you look back at my comment on The Legend Part 1 you will see that these statements from Part 2 are the "little intricate details" that I referred to as part of the work my local gunmaker would incooperate into his package for a fraction of what D'arcy charges. You also can be certain that my smith will assure me of that MOA we all cherish so much or he would keep working on it until it produced what is anticipated and/or demanded even from a big gun. Seems to me that either D'arcy said or I read that he prefers the latter day Classic controlled feed Winchester M-70 actions over the originals due to superior steel. Probably easier to find and maybe cheaper as well. I first checked out the Legend several years ago when they were first produced in a limited number of cartridge choices and was very impressed until I saw the price.
-Don't waste your time serving these guys fine steak when all they want is a greasy hamburg with ketchup and jalapeños, and then wash it down with Mad Dog 20/20.
-I’m still trying to find MOA’s in these here woods. …Tough to find for an unprotected species.
-With a dangerous game rifle you hold on the brown and put a bullet into the mother.
If people are buying them then he's not overcharging and he's meeting a need. If they are lined up then just the opposite.
Dave - Is he switching over to the new MOA Trigger system on the new guns? Or will he stay with the old style? I'd be curious why in either case.
Wonderful attention to detail! At 14K there should be. I've never wanted a Rolex watch and have never seen the need for one as there are suitable alternatives at a far cheaper price. I buy my rifles under the same philosophy. I do enjoy looking at such wonders of craftsmanship though! Keep showing us how the well healed magazine editor lives and hunts Dave.
Oh, I took your advice, I'm not nearly as bitter as I was last week...
Top flight riflesmiths, like Echols, are like other artists. It takes years to get established and to get a name for yourself and a clientele. After you do all that and work your butt off and put up with fickle customers, you can charge accordingly. I don't begrudge Mr. Echols in the least.
Dave one more thought and then I am done with the Legend. In reality are not these rifles to be considered semi-customs or even semi-production rifles? They are not created one at a time to the buyer's specifications unless things have changed in the last few years. I believe D'arcy makes them up a few at a time so you can buy your copy which is exactly like the next guy's gun, except possibly the selection of caliber, who is willing to drop the 14 grand. Good way of doing business if you can pull it off. Roy Weatherby used to tell us how much better his rifles were than anyone else's so he could charge more than Remchester. They were prettier no doubt about that.
Also curious why he lengthened the ejection port (rear, front, both?). Seems lengthening it could weaken the action just a bit - has to have a darn good reason on a rifle like this. Did he also change the ejector blade length and material? Also intrigued by the size of the forward lug, and that he developed his own mag box and follower out of stainless. Doesn't look like there is a muzzle brake. Obviously, lots of thought went into the gun. Looking forward to part III.
Beekeeper,
I used to think that the Rolex watch was the thing to have on your wrist to show "you've made it". Then I found out their time keeping ability wasn't any better than a Timex.
This gun is surely a work of art, but most of us here cannot afford works of art. What we want is a quality firearm that will put food on the table that doesn't cost a half years wages but still shoots just as accuratly as a work of art.
Dave,
I'm almost done testing tents and have a little free time coming up. How about sending that thing over with a case of ammo and I will give it a good going over for you free of charge. Oh the going over will be free. Like the tents I get to keep the rifle right?
NOS Dave but have you checked the Damascus knives made by Percival Roberts? He's making me a patch knife for my Flinter and a hunting knife both with Ivory handles. He's at www.capt.plroberts@yahoo.com.
Greasy hamburger? I'm just waiting for the soup lines to open... My wife gets Country Weekly and they sent us a letter saying they were no longer available by subscription please choose one of two other mag's to fulfill your subscription and buy your Country Weekly at the newsstand. For what, like five times the price? At least my grandkids will be able to tell stories to their grandkids about growing up in the Great Depression II when they get old. Then again Big Brother probably won't let you raise your own children by then. The government can do everything better don't you know? I'll even bet they could build a $14,000 rifle that shoots better than this one.
Out of pretty wood too!
I'd like to see just how smooth these actions REALLY are. According to every gun editor in the country the really old Model 70's were slicker than greased lightening anyway so why not just invest in those?
Oh, I imagine the action is slicker than snot, as is probably most of the rest of this rifle. I just can't get into it.
Every time I try to read one of your posts regaling the overpriced guns that are out of my financial reach, my eyes glaze over and all I see is wonk wonk wonk. You realize you're (becoming) a gun snob and are not relating to the majority of us that can't afford this shit? I have a used Browning rifle that will put bullets into the same bullet hole at 100 yds., and all it cost me was $550. Posts like these just don't relate to me and only piss me off that much more, knowing that I will never be able to afford something like this. Okay, we get that you're among the privileged few that could have gotten his hands on rifles like these, one way or another; I don't need to be constantly reminded that I will never be able to get one of these rifles (not that I would, anyway). Ugh!
Not that I wouldn't love a rifle like this (in .270) mind you, but this is a hand-finished rifle, not hand made. McMillan makes the stock, Krieger makes the barrel, and Winchester makes the actions. Yes he puts it together and trues everything up nicely, but it's hard to see where the $14 thou went. My $400 Remington stainless .30-06 would outshoot this one, too. Sorry.
All:
I have two semi-custom bolt action rifles in my possession at this point in time. One has a #3 fluted Shilen barrel. The other has a heavier fluted Leija barrel. Both have high-end zero-creep triggers. The actions and barrels in both rifles are "blueprinted." One rifle is a .280 Ackley Improved. The other is a 7x57 Ackley Improved. Both rifles will consistently shoot 1/2" groups at 100 yards with the right handloads. The .280 AI, which is glass- and pillar-bedded in a formerly-quite-lovely Remington 700 Classic stock that clearly received some extra loving attention from the gunsmith before I received the rifle, is a little too light and kicks hard from the bench at the range, but is tolerable in the field. The 7x57 AI, which is in a modified Hogue all-weather stock, is too heavy to carry around all day in rough terrain, but kicks hardly at all.
Both rifles will accomplish any reasonable shooting objective I could ask of them. The 7x57 AI will do so in any weather anywhere.
Neither rifle cost more than $1500.
Why spend more?
TWD
NB: I have another semi-custom rifle getting a new barrel and a little work done to it at a high-end shop in Pleasanton, Texas, that maybe, just possibly, might finally get returned to me sometime in the next century--and yes, there's some genuine annoyance here about further months of delays for no justifiable reason I can see--but that's another story. No matter what the price tag is on a rifle, or who is building it, it shouldn't take 6 months or 9 months or a year to get a new barrel put on the rifle, have maybe two days of work done to the rifle (blueprinting, glass bedding, fixing the trigger), and finally get the thing back in one's hands. I might be able to rationalize a higher price with faster service, but it's awfully hard to do so when the high-end gunsmith ends up possessing the rifle for longer than its owner does. TWD
To be continued? Again?
Man, that Mossberg piece really got under your skin didn't it Dave?
Jim
P.S. Dave, I shot my mossy 500 today. It sure is sweet......hahahahah
If you look at many custom rifles once you break into calibers over .308 and especially over .338 MOA guarantees are hard to come by much less to achieve. I know 400 of you have a 338 win mag that shoots MOA but they are a lot more that don't and its a simple fact is its harder to so in bigger calibers.That is unless you have a 25 pound solid block of metal benchrest machine that looks much like a prooving barrel. What I am talking about is a gun you can actualy carry hunting. Beside if you have a .400+ caliber gun shooting a 1.3 inch group is gonna look quite nice considering the size of the holes you leave in the paper. Now would I try to save up over the year for a 14K anything firearm, hell no. But when my powerball numbers come thru for me watch out.
Even though I can't afford rifles like this (yet), I still enjoy reading about them, as I do most topics in your column. Then again, I also like to look at supermodels, admire sports cars, and read about hunting in Africa, so I may be a little weird.
Don't let the naysayers force you to write about topics that don't excite you.
I own some custom arms, but my definition of "custom" seems not to apply on this blog. By custom, what I mean is built for me, and me alone, length of pull is a little longer than factory, drop a little more, bedding 1.5-2" forward of recoil lug, caliber & twist specified by me, action trued, tested on Rockwell gauge, bolt lugs lapped to action and all metal finished glass smooth and blued or Parkerized as the case may be. The last one I purchased is a .338/06 that cost just under one thousand bucks. Pillar and glass bedded, tiger maple stock, Shilen
barrel, Shilen trigger, and grouped .785 at 100yds the very first 5 shots I fired after sighting in. That was with Nozler factory loads.
Granted, mine is a 700 Rem., not a mod70 south paw, which I wouldn't have any use for anyway, also not a magnum, which I wouldn't have any use for either, but I wouldn't trade rifle for rifle, even Steven.
What I'm trying to say here is, a custom rifle is like a custom car, one of a kind, like I want it to be.
But if he can sell his work for such a ridiculous price, he probably could become a multi-millionaire by selling Florida water front building sites, and not have to work such long hours
My how we get worked up on this thing. Last week Phil talked about a working mans gun and this week Dave comes out talking about something on the top shelf most of us can't reach. I read and have read this magazine most of my life for exactly that reason. I get to see both sides and get an education about guns I may never see. I read about 10000 to20000 dollar elk hunts on here for the same reason. I may never get to go on one but all hunting, fishing and shooting is what I love not just what I can afford. But there is also advice and articles on what I can. Dave has been providing me with an education for years. And while I may never have a need for it there may come a time when I am around people who are discussing and I will know atleast a little about it. Thanks Dave!
The reason most big bore rifles are singles and doubles is because the recoil would ruin most open action type rifles in short order. Ever see a locking lug sheered off? When being charged by a large critter intent on your demise, having 4 shots is like having 2 guns, and in such a circumstance 'the more the merrier'. Building a bolt gun to handle the task season afer season is an accomplishment at any price. So the question then is,"How much would you pay to avoid being mauled, gored or trampled?"
Dave, have you looked at the April 13, 2009 issue of Gun Digest yet? You will find two full pages (74-75)of Jim Carmichel's guns for sale. Most of them are new unfired guns. Do all you writers get so many free guns that when you retire you have to sell off the extra ones. Notice that most of them have a personal serial number that was reserved for Mr Carmichel. With this many spare guns laying around I suppose you can afford lots of nice guns. You can look at the guns at www.connecticutshotgun.com
No one wants to be irrelevant...but this focus is just about there. A dangerous game rifle, over-tricked, and under-performing...at $14,000 smackers.
Let's change the subject...??
Blue
If i ever want to really treat myself(i do someday) I'll buy a Kimber, but then I'd have a guilty consience about it, knowing that money could've went towards the mortgage or college-funds.
Nope, still not interested. Like others have said, there's not a lot done here that isn't available on other rifles for a small percentage of this.
I've seen car mods like this. Totally unnecessary, but mostly done for the "cool" factor.
This seems a rifle for the "But it's a $14,000 rifle!" crowd. I think a serious shooter has much more fun out-shooting their friends with plainer, less expensive rifles. I sure do.
Ok this thing is a work of art like Salvador Dahli's percistence of time. Yeah right (I know a lot of you are scratching your head wondering how my redneck a$$ got that one) I wish they would have reprinted last weeks comment they are just as accurate today. You know Dave your getting up there with Craig Boddington on your wonderful coverage of irrelevent items that no one here can/would afford.
Is there not a new gun out there that we can all afford that some one could read about??
How bought a history piece on John Browning, Sam Colt, or Jim Beam or Jack Daniels? Just trying to be helpful I hope the F&S gods don't smite me down for this one! LOL
I just want to know how the final total was arrived at. How do you get 14k for what is essentially semi-custom work, where a fully custom rifle from someone like Mark Bansner is a fraction of the cost? I would undertand it more if there was intricate hand detailing of metal or wood using some old-world technique, but this rifle lacks that artistic hand finishing. I know, I know, the pains-taking hand work went into making the rifle dead reliable. Again, there are a plethora of gunsmiths who I believe could do the exact same for a lot less. Ultimately, I guess I'm not jealous of the rifle, but of the guy who figured out how to make more money than his peers for the same product.
Question for all ye bearers of Sour Grapes:
How much do you think the engineering, testing, tooling, labor, and overhead expenses cost for your cheap $400 Savage or your $500 Remington?
Answer; Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars. Just with the big guys, the cost is spread over a hundred thousand units or more, not 20 per year.
A fine rifle like this should be admired as art of the craft, not whining about how much it costs, how you can't afford it, and how your Wally-rifle will outshoot it. Me, I have no practical purpose for such a rifle. It's a good thing, since I can't afford it or the safari to use it either.
14 thousand and the damn thing doesn't even come with a bolt...ouch.
(For those of you that read the magazine follower, my tongue is firmly in my cheek.)
Another overpriced and completely irrelevant piece of equipment. My Encore will outshoot it with any of the five barrels I own and even if I had that kind of money to waste it would be on a trip of a lifetime and not a gun safe stuffer.
platte river rat
Wow! What a collection of firearms for sale at Connecticut Shotgun. Thanks for the link.
Notice Jim is not selling any of his rifles chambered in .280!
WMH
To paraphrase a line, it seems to me the "Legend" is a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist. If people (read: fools) want to pay $14,000 for a rifle that your local gunsmith, or Kimber or Winchester or Remington, will gladly build for you at about 1/10th of Echols' ("Legend"ary) $14k price, so be it, but I will not be one of them.
Here's an idea: Maybe Mr. Echols should go work for AIG. The top people there want an awful lot for the awful little they produce, too.
TWD
How much of what is done here could be built into a factory rifle? It seems that by the time the rework is done most of the rifle has been thrown out and replaced. Seems to me that if factory rifles started with the good parts (like a good trigger or lengthend ejection port) a lot of this could be done for maybe a little higher cost, not the cost of 7 or 10 extra rifles.
I appreciate guns ... all guns. And I like to learn about all of them, whether I can afford them or not. Having an engineering background I appreciate hearing about the details and thoughts that go into them. I might just learn a couple of things that could go into a gun I own or want to customize. From what I am seeing, when you start adding up all the things he does to the gun the cost adds up pretty quickly. And if D'Arcy Echols can build a reputation where he can charge the prices he does then more power to him. Like Petzel said, it is like comparing a street Chevy to its race bred namesake. The car owner still admires the race car, even though it is not for him.
If you loan it to me I'll say some nice things about it too...
I double dog dare you to do something about a Mossberg rifle. Lever or bolt take your choice, just for fun. It doesn't always have to be high end stuff you can throw a curve ball every once in a while. I won't tell.
It's not that I wouldn't spend that kind of change on a firearm. I would if I had it, but I'd try for a vintage double or magazine rifle that has been putting big holes in nasty animals for many years and will likely continue to do so. To each his or her own is my philosophy. Is Mark-1 making anyone else hungry? I eat a lot of ketchup. And if that expensive wine is so good, why don't they make it in orange flavor? Mmmmm!
If they did all the things suggested for factory rifles, most of you could not afford them!
How many of you shell out $1,200 - $1,400 for a basic Weatherby Mk V or do you go to Wally World for your $390 Vanguard or matte finished (ruster) Remington 700?
Those Mossberg rifles make mighty fine boat paddles and Hi-Lift jack handles.
Maybe so. But they still shoot MOA, are highly reliable, and don't cost $14K. And if a synthstocked Wally World special is a "boat paddle," it's at least much less expensive than a $14K synthstocked boat boat paddle.
For $14K I am confident that I could find a rifle that's the equal, with outstanding finish, a fine wood stock, and some tasteful engraving. And I think that's the main point people have been making in this discussion.
For a lot less I could get a Mannlicher Schoenauer in outstanding condition. Who'd want something like the Legend when they can own something that is less expensive, better machined, better looking, and a true legend by virtue of its record of use, rather than something that is literally a "legend" only in name?
I'm sure Mr. Nichols rifles do their jobs very well. But for $14K? And I suppose it just rubs me the wrong way a little to have the obvious hype in name selection. It's kinda presumptuous to name something a "legend" when it's a new product in comparison with the rest of the market.
When I think of legendary rifles, I think of the Winchester 73, the Mannlicher-Schoenauers of the 1950s, the Lee Enfield, the Sharps buffalo rifles, the M1 Garand, the Winchester Model 70, almost anything made by Holland and Holland, and the Mauser 98. Even the Krag U.S. and the Weatherby Mark V deluxe are, by comparison with the Nichols product, "legends."
Nichols "legend" is just a very very expensive, well built, ugly rifle. Why pay $14K for that when you can put a Swarovski or Leupold Scope on a Mannlicher Schoenauer 1956 in .458 Win Mag for less than $5K?
Talk about incentive!
I have all the rifles I'll probably ever need, A s/s 12 gauge, a lever action 30/30 and a lever action 22.
Now what I need first are some books and some tools. I'll work on checkering and finish first the move on to engraving or trigger pull. Working on MOA is something that requires a lot of work on me, not so much on the rifle.
I won't spend 14k and in the mean time I'll have a lot of fun.
When I'm done, if you've got 7k I'll give you a bargain.
I acquired most of my heavy caliber rifles before synthetic stocks came to the market. In those bygone days, Remington, Winchester, Sako, and Browning produced two, so called heavy calibers, 375 H & H and 458 Win Mag. All four of these manufacturers sold them to the public with production stocks better suited for lighter calibers. Often the wood was not heavy or dense enough. Therefore, recoil splits in the grips and abusive recoil were not uncommon. Priced inexpensively, they sold well to us who hunted dangerous game, but if we could dig up the extra money, sometimes we bought semi custom British rifles or, indeed, custom U.S. rifles which would solve these problems.
The first time I read of synthetic stocks was in Jim Carmichels book "The Rifle" where he predicted them to be the wave of the future, inexpensive, stable, and almost indestructible.
Now we see gunsmithing entrepreneurs have taken these issues to even higher levels. Often, todays hunting intellectuals feel exotic calibers, high tech scopes, fine tuning, and weather proof stocks are more important than practice, practice, practice.
Alas, I must plead guilty to some of this myself.
WA Mtnhunter, there is a vast difference between "could" afford and "would." I don't want to compare balance sheets with you or anyone else; I do O.K. for me and mine. I think the issue people are discussing here is the value for the money. See my previous comment on part one regarding centerfolds. I like reading about rifles like this one as well, and the purchase price wouldn't make a good down payment on some of the ones featured in the Double Gun and Single Shot Journal. That being said, I also enjoy articles about Mossbergs and other makes that frankly offer a lot more bang for the buck.
Platte River Rat;
I got a look at the guns Carmichael is selling. It looks like he went through his gun rack and said to himself, "Time to make room for some more guns." None of the guns Carmichael is selling are 'out there' in any way, no wildcats, no customs; just good solid factory hardware in off the shelf calibers. And as has been pointed out, no .280s are for sale. Interesting.
With the Echols rifle, nobody is arguing that it is not a mighty fine rifle; what sticks is the fourteen grand price tag. In this month's American Rifleman, the Kimber Talkeetna rifle (I think that's how it's spelled) is tested. It is a synthetic stocked .375 with a good barrel, solid open sights, and controlled feed action that shot better than the Echols, for about two grand. For the price of the Echols rifle you could get this Kimber and have enough money left over for a decent scope and two pretty good hunting trips to Alaska, or one trip to Africa for plains game.
Hell, I can't afford a $2,000 rifle. Not even a $500 one right now. I am grateful for the 10 rifles, 7 shotguns, 6 pistols, and 1 22/20 ga combo gun that I possess. Only 2 of them cost me more than $400 and those 2 were less than $1,000 and everyone is a real shooter lest they be gone.
I would be ashamed to compare balance sheets with almost anyone who can afford a computer to read this blog! My point is that we should not be so quick to criticize Mr. Echols' creation with an attitude. My Taurus was as reliable as any Bentley ever made, yet don't compare the two. Affordability is all relative.
I did not intend to offend anyone with my comments. like old Gunslinger says, "shoot um straight and often".
Maybe we're all missing the point here. Maybe this is God's way of telling us that unless we love house cats and put up with their hair and fragrance in our homes that we'll never be able to afford firearms we really don't need.
WA Mtnhunter, I wasn't trying to test anyone's boiling point. just, passing on some info. I have two rifles in 280 Rem too. A Ruger#1B and a Remington Mtn rifle. they will two of my guns that will pass on to family members.As far as balance sheets goes who cares---take care of your fmily first--- then do your hobby things. Money isn't something to be worshiped---its just a tool you receive for honest labor.
To MLH: I doubt very much whether D'Arcy will switch to the new Model 70 trigger. It's an unproved mechanism, and the original is the best trigger ever put on a sporting rifle.
To Beekeeper: I'm glad you're less bitter. Keep working on it. You might be interested to know that about 15 years ago, I held in my soft sweaty hands one Rolex that was worth $980,000 and another that was worth a million even. Did I get to keep them? No I did not.
To Jim in Mo. The action goes beyond slick. The bolt seems to fly back and forth by itself. I've never used anything quite like it.
On the accuracy issue: Getting a rifle like this to shoot closer than it does would be pointless; the rifle is intended for dangerous game which means lion (450 pounds) at the smallest to elephant (12,000 pounds) AT RANGES OF 100 YARDS OR LESS. USUALLY A HELL OF A LOT LESS. Why do you want a minute of angle rifle for this kind of work unless your brain is soft?
About looks: It was the owner's intention to have a walnut stock made, but the rifle went into service immediately and has stayed there. Someday it will get done.
About Jim Carmichel's gun collection: I don't know if I'm at liberty to comment.
platte river rat,
I checked out those guns and I checked out those prices. Does Carmichael think we're fools? Not one of those Rem 700 were worth a dime more than today's prices, if that.
Well Dave, can you comment on how many gun safes Mr. Carmichel has? Good lord CS only posted the guns they've received so far. As someone else posted I too went to that site looking for one of Jim's beloved .280's. Truth be told when I first went to buy a big game rifle I looked for a 280, mostly on his good word. But with limited funds the manufacturers that did chamber for them, I couldn't afford at the time.
i think a 14K rifle that is a repeater, in a calibre that will stop a charging buff, and goes boom everytime the trigger is pulled is worth every penny. african dangerous game hunters dont buy rifles on what they do right now, but what they will do when thee wrong thing happens. i cant afford one, but i cant afford to got to africa either.
You are right on the money, WA Mtnhunter, it's all relative. Nobody really needs a $14,000 rifle, but I'd sure like to have one. I like the looks of Ed Brown's "custom" rifles for the money, but horses for courses as our British friends say. We are having a heated agreement.
AS I have stated many times, my Rem. 700 custom shop 06 and 25-06, both beautiful Walnut, both will shoot l-2" groups all day. And, I paid less than 2K for each, with Nikon Scops, Leupold base/rings,. Triggers were adjusted to my specks. If I had the l65 Million AIG got I would not pay 14K for a gun to put in my safe. I got a Custom MAuser and thats where it sits, but cost less than 14K. A pratical gun that shoots as well as you can is all any of us need. The Rem 700, Marlin XL7, Moseburg,70's and others will do ok for 99% of us hunters. A lot of pratice and the correct Ammo for the game you will hunt is all any one needs . AS for slick actions, try Marlins XL7's and see how slick a bolt can be. A tad of graphite on many bolt guns(even very fine steel wool) will improve the action and bolt slide as gunk will build up on the action and especially the bolt and chamber. Most guys fail to keep their firearms clean and well maintained. Guns like cars, no service and no good results. So, I will just shoot my 700's and XL7 and hope I can afford one more Rocky Mtn Hunt while I'm able to go. Many of you recall my story about the older man and his 06 with taped grip, thats what we all seem to forget, it's not the beauty or parts making the gun, it's how well we can hunt and shoot when crunch times comes. Shoot-um-straight and often
what a waste of time,, in these tough economic times a 14k rifle looks like a really bad idea
There are MANY many more important things you could do with 14K than buy a rifle. Put you kids through college, pay off your car. I hate to say it but the thought of using that much money on something like a firearm is almost revolting.
It might be that accurate but until this article, I had not heard of this gun at all. I think there is a reason why too. A $14,000 reason why. Not many hunters, especially now, are going to spend that kind of money on a rifle when they can get one for much much less than half that amount. Even half the amount would buy a nice rifle and scope that could have the same accuracy. I think this might be one of those guns that people like to brag about and how expensive it is and its' capabilities...
GUNSLINGER
Right you are! Our basic utility rifles will certainly do the job for 99.9 percent of us. I just can't understand the negative comments on this 14K rifle. Of course we can't afford it. Most of us can't afford many of the things we admire or at least like to look at. If the rich boys want to spend money on stuff like that, have at it.
It just seems to me that many of these negative comments are born of pure green envy and it ain't pretty!
I just hope that I can afford to go back to Colorado again this year. It looks like it may be a budget trip this year. Planning one less night on the road each way, setting a stricter grub budget, staying at a cheaper place, etc. I don't need any new guns or gear. Just time and oportunity to use what I have. I have plenty of ammo for my elk rifle and backup rifle, so the ammo crunch doesn't matter either.
WMH
I think you really don't understand the reaction, WAMtnhunter. Most of us just don't see $14K worth of value in that rifle. Was I to win the powerball and suddenly have millions at my disposal, or even tens of milliosn, "D'arcy Nichols' 'Legend' rifle" would not even be on the radar. Not even if it was chambered for a round that I want.
There's no accounting for taste of course, so I don't expect you to agree with an opinion about aesthetic. But I'd be embarressed to admit paying $14K for a rifle with a synthetic stock.
I have a customer who drives a Ford Explorer and a Bentley. I asked him why he got the Bentley. He said he didn't want one until he test drove it.
Custom Rifle: $14,000
European Scope: $1,500
Tanned, Latigo Leather Sling: $125
Custom made ammunition: $100/box
Realizing you missed the side of the barn at 200 paces
because your plastic-stocked "gee whiz" head-turner missed the structure all together...PRICELESS
Go, Shootstir...
How far must one go before someone is foolish, over a rifle? Even if one hits yon barn.
How about something on old German rifles, guys? Or, customizing one we already have?
Blue
WA Mtnhunter:
I don't own a $2000 rifle either. Until recently I was lucky to own a $2000 CAR. All I wanted to say was that for $14,000 you can get a mighty fine rifle with a custom barrel, good stock and sights, all the bells, and have $12,000 left over. I'm sure the Echols rifle is smoother and nicer than the Kimber, but is it BETTER?
David Petzal:
I've never shot at any animal that was going to charge me if I missed it, so you have me there. But our troops use a $1000 semi-auto rifle on terrorists who shoot back. If reliable performance under stress is what we are after, maybe we ought to shoot dangerous game with ARs chambered for .458 SOCOM.
Oh, and go ahead and comment on all the blue steel .308s on Carmichael's for sale pile. Nice rifles, but he's obviously saving the real good stuff for himself.
I'm not entirely against the gun, I just don't see it as a value. If I were an AIG exec and getting my million out of the Dems and were inclined to shoot a charging buff from twenty paces things would certainly be different. I wouldn't be looking for value, I would be looking to impress and keep myself alive and this gun fits the bill. But I'm not and Rem 700's (not the matte) and Vanguards pretty much are where I'm at. Of course I didn't actually use either one this year but I had fun with a No. 1A... I guess it's nice to know they're around but if I'm looking at something I can't buy anyways I'm sticking with "show me pretty".
WAMTN Hunter:
I have no need for a l4K firearm, my 700's do just fine aand this new MArlin XL7 on the bench is doing great. I only bought the Marlin as a 4 wheeler gun and tuck haul about. Some places i ride the 4 wheelr are death on pretty Walnut.
I also hope I can find enough $$$$ to go back to the Rockies this fall, but things not looking as if I will be able to. I can't drive that distance, I must fly and my wife goes along. We stay in a Motel and et out, so it's a costly trip. But, the 14k would allow me to make 2 trips, maybe another gun, that I dont; need but would like to own.But been around long enough to know my want's will not kill me.I'm just thankful to hunt and use what I got, which is enough. High Dollar equiptment is no better than cheaper( I got a Custom Mauser and it sits) if you use it proper and pratice enough. As long as I can put 3 rounds in a 2-3" circle at 200 yds i'm pleased. Shoot-um-straight and often
Gunslinger
I'm with you. For $14K, I can go to Colorado hunting at least 6 times, well, maybe just 4 on my hillbilly deluxe plan. I don't have any rich relatives, so the chances of me ever having enough loose change to go to Africa on a hunt are slim and none. And Slim just left town.
Take care
Accurizing doesnt cost that much as this rifle,but a fool is found everyday. I accurized my AR15 for 300 $ and it shoots 3/4 inch at 100 yards. They say that rifle is an 1 1/2 grouper? I would be embarassed.
I'd like to have friends that could afford this rifle. They'd be good friends and let me shoot it from time to time. And for those putting down the accuracy of the rifle, 1.5 MOA out of a .404 Jeffrey or any other stopping rifle is pretty damn good. Your .223 may group into .3 MOA, but it would just piss off a Cape Buffalo.
It might. But if the standard of accuracy is really "minute of pie plate" much less "minute of cape buffalo" then pretty much any OTC rifle in the desired cartridge will do the job every bit as well, for less than 1/10th the price.
That old Ford Taurus will get you to Wal-Mart just as well as that Bentley or Rolls Royce, just not in style! Your $2.99 stocking cap from the truck stop will keep your ears warm, just not in the "style" that my Stormy Kromer will! Some things never end! LOL
WAMtnHunter -
If an OTC Remington or Ruger is a "Ford Taurus" among rifles, then the "Legend" is a "Chevy Cavalier" with an additional $13K of chrome and bumper stickers.
Checked out Carmichael's Collection up for sale. Unless I missed something Ol'Mike's only selling production guns. I thought he might be selling some of those rifles he built himself. Bummer!!!!
Still can't believe the number of you characters built on the cheap. Where do you go with Marlin bolt action or a Vanguard? A custom gunsmith could could put his heart and soul into trying to rework these gas pipes and you'd still come out with POS.
I always see my first comment got a minus nine comments!!! At least I found you guys read what I write. :-)
A gun like that gets handed down to the next generation big game hunter in the family. You guys are obsessing on the comparative prices between your Remington 700s etal and a purpose built hierloom rifle throwing out 400gr bullets that would stop a charging lion in it's tracks after a few days abuse fording rivers and miles of bush and brush. Whoever inherits the rifle will no doubt inherit the stories of it's hunts and all that is worth. I doubt many accolades will be bestowed upon any of the thousands of worn out old deer rifles most of have to leave.
Good Point Big Daddy! These type of guns have magic/souls as well as a story that are passed on! Case in point:
I recently passed on my Beretta 686 EL to my son who separated from the USA last year and is a conservation law major now. I also passed on to him my custom-built mauser 35 Whelen. The rifle was built when the idea of hunting Alaska was a remote dream, but the rifle and me manifested the dream 3x’s and South Africa. The Beretta also made Alaska and SA, has taken 14 club championships, untold waterfowl and pheasants. Both guns will be passed on my son to his son. The Cycle continues!!!!!
Neither gun is in the class of our Legend, but neither is a Clunker either that will see a pawn shop.
I don't see why this gun is any more of an heirloom than the shotguns and rifles I inherited from my dad and grandad. They have stories and history and though they didn't cost $14,000 they are pricless to me.
Dr R,
If you can't understand and see it now, you never will.
...Certainly enjoy the treasures you have and be proud.
Mike Diehl
Good point! I think I own a few Taurus' and Cavalier's myself. The closest thing I have to heirloom is a Weatherby Mark V that my wife gave me on our 30th wedding anniversary and my Remington 700 .35 Whelen which has killed all the elk and a majority of the deer I have taken. Those two, my single shot Stevens 94, and my S&W service revolver will leave my possession when I am no longer able to use them. The rest are simply possessions and toys.
Mark-1
I am glad to hear that you had the wisdom to own a .35 Whelen. My son will get mine, too.
WMH
The "Legend" is not the kind of rifle that would pass for an heirloom in my extended family. There's no question that it is reliable and the fit and finish are good, but it's not attractive in any way.
I've got a heavily used Mannlicher -- the one in my avatar. It's utilitarian as well. My grandfather modified the bolt handle. I added a real recoil pad. It has been in our family three generations. It has taken many deer, including my first deer, that I shot when I was hunting with my dad more than 25 years ago. Its real market value is maybe in the area of a thousand dollars. But in my view, it's a BETTER engineered rifle than the Legend, and it's a better looking rifle than any synthetic stocked firearm ever will be. Even if it did not have a cherished family history, I wouldn't trade it for a "Legend" on an even swap.
The initial defense of the expense associated with the "Legend" in this blog was that it is very accurate. We have all noted that very accurate OTC rifles don't cost nearly as much. In response, the defenders of the $14K price tag said in effect "accuracy doesn't matter as long as you can hit a charging buffalo." That's rather an admission that the extra $13K you spent accurizing that rifle doesn't matter.
So what's the defense of the $14K price? It doesn't look like a good rifle; it couldn't with a synthetic stock. The bluing is nothing special. It has no visual embellishments. It's "virtue" seems to amount to an unsubstantiated claim that it "must be better because it cost alot more than an OTC rifle that has the same functionality."
I can get a new accustocked, accutrigger, Savage rifle that is every bit as reliable and accurate as the $14K job and in the same round. Why in heaven's name would I pay $14K for a rifle when I can pay a thousand or less for identical quality?
Heirloom firearms come in two flavors. The ones we love because of the experiences that we recall, or the ancestral stories associated with it, and the ones that are ultra high quality good looking firearms. If I had $14K to spend on an heirloom, I'd buy pristine Mannlicher with a nice scope and save lots of money, or I'd buy an A.H.Fox shotgun. The "Legend" wouldn't make my long list, much less my short list, even if it were offered in my favorite round, the .30-06. It's a utilitarian rifle, and anything it can do can be done by an OTC rifle for far less money.
Mr. Diehl . . .
You and I do not agree about everything, but concerning your comment above re the "Legend" (and its legendary price), I agree with you 100%. I'll take a Kimber if I want something fancy. I'll take a Savage if I want something I can count on anywhere, anytime, that doesn't cost much. And I'll defer to my local gunsmith and provide him with an action and $1500 and be happy when he gives me a custom-fitted rifle that will do anything the Legend will do, and just as reliably and accurately.
But $14K? That just sounds crazy to me.
TWD
Post a Comment
At $14,000.oo, That kind of accurracy is not overkill. I get that from my Savage. I'm sure these guns are well made and well engineered, but hardly relevant to 99.9% of hunters.
AS I have stated many times, my Rem. 700 custom shop 06 and 25-06, both beautiful Walnut, both will shoot l-2" groups all day. And, I paid less than 2K for each, with Nikon Scops, Leupold base/rings,. Triggers were adjusted to my specks. If I had the l65 Million AIG got I would not pay 14K for a gun to put in my safe. I got a Custom MAuser and thats where it sits, but cost less than 14K. A pratical gun that shoots as well as you can is all any of us need. The Rem 700, Marlin XL7, Moseburg,70's and others will do ok for 99% of us hunters. A lot of pratice and the correct Ammo for the game you will hunt is all any one needs . AS for slick actions, try Marlins XL7's and see how slick a bolt can be. A tad of graphite on many bolt guns(even very fine steel wool) will improve the action and bolt slide as gunk will build up on the action and especially the bolt and chamber. Most guys fail to keep their firearms clean and well maintained. Guns like cars, no service and no good results. So, I will just shoot my 700's and XL7 and hope I can afford one more Rocky Mtn Hunt while I'm able to go. Many of you recall my story about the older man and his 06 with taped grip, thats what we all seem to forget, it's not the beauty or parts making the gun, it's how well we can hunt and shoot when crunch times comes. Shoot-um-straight and often
I think you really don't understand the reaction, WAMtnhunter. Most of us just don't see $14K worth of value in that rifle. Was I to win the powerball and suddenly have millions at my disposal, or even tens of milliosn, "D'arcy Nichols' 'Legend' rifle" would not even be on the radar. Not even if it was chambered for a round that I want.
There's no accounting for taste of course, so I don't expect you to agree with an opinion about aesthetic. But I'd be embarressed to admit paying $14K for a rifle with a synthetic stock.
Custom Rifle: $14,000
European Scope: $1,500
Tanned, Latigo Leather Sling: $125
Custom made ammunition: $100/box
Realizing you missed the side of the barn at 200 paces
because your plastic-stocked "gee whiz" head-turner missed the structure all together...PRICELESS
This rifle's claim to accuracy is only 1.3 MOA using handloads? For $14K? Is that sort of inaccuracy a common limitation of the cartridge for which the rifle is chambered?
This is a dangerous game gun in a dangerous game caliber. Good luck getting MOA with one of those.
All you need is MOCCB accuracy -
Minute of Charging Cape Buffalo.
Wonderful attention to detail! At 14K there should be. I've never wanted a Rolex watch and have never seen the need for one as there are suitable alternatives at a far cheaper price. I buy my rifles under the same philosophy. I do enjoy looking at such wonders of craftsmanship though! Keep showing us how the well healed magazine editor lives and hunts Dave.
Oh, I took your advice, I'm not nearly as bitter as I was last week...
This gun is surely a work of art, but most of us here cannot afford works of art. What we want is a quality firearm that will put food on the table that doesn't cost a half years wages but still shoots just as accuratly as a work of art.
Platte River Rat;
I got a look at the guns Carmichael is selling. It looks like he went through his gun rack and said to himself, "Time to make room for some more guns." None of the guns Carmichael is selling are 'out there' in any way, no wildcats, no customs; just good solid factory hardware in off the shelf calibers. And as has been pointed out, no .280s are for sale. Interesting.
With the Echols rifle, nobody is arguing that it is not a mighty fine rifle; what sticks is the fourteen grand price tag. In this month's American Rifleman, the Kimber Talkeetna rifle (I think that's how it's spelled) is tested. It is a synthetic stocked .375 with a good barrel, solid open sights, and controlled feed action that shot better than the Echols, for about two grand. For the price of the Echols rifle you could get this Kimber and have enough money left over for a decent scope and two pretty good hunting trips to Alaska, or one trip to Africa for plains game.
If you look back at my comment on The Legend Part 1 you will see that these statements from Part 2 are the "little intricate details" that I referred to as part of the work my local gunmaker would incooperate into his package for a fraction of what D'arcy charges. You also can be certain that my smith will assure me of that MOA we all cherish so much or he would keep working on it until it produced what is anticipated and/or demanded even from a big gun. Seems to me that either D'arcy said or I read that he prefers the latter day Classic controlled feed Winchester M-70 actions over the originals due to superior steel. Probably easier to find and maybe cheaper as well. I first checked out the Legend several years ago when they were first produced in a limited number of cartridge choices and was very impressed until I saw the price.
Greasy hamburger? I'm just waiting for the soup lines to open... My wife gets Country Weekly and they sent us a letter saying they were no longer available by subscription please choose one of two other mag's to fulfill your subscription and buy your Country Weekly at the newsstand. For what, like five times the price? At least my grandkids will be able to tell stories to their grandkids about growing up in the Great Depression II when they get old. Then again Big Brother probably won't let you raise your own children by then. The government can do everything better don't you know? I'll even bet they could build a $14,000 rifle that shoots better than this one.
Every time I try to read one of your posts regaling the overpriced guns that are out of my financial reach, my eyes glaze over and all I see is wonk wonk wonk. You realize you're (becoming) a gun snob and are not relating to the majority of us that can't afford this shit? I have a used Browning rifle that will put bullets into the same bullet hole at 100 yds., and all it cost me was $550. Posts like these just don't relate to me and only piss me off that much more, knowing that I will never be able to afford something like this. Okay, we get that you're among the privileged few that could have gotten his hands on rifles like these, one way or another; I don't need to be constantly reminded that I will never be able to get one of these rifles (not that I would, anyway). Ugh!
All:
I have two semi-custom bolt action rifles in my possession at this point in time. One has a #3 fluted Shilen barrel. The other has a heavier fluted Leija barrel. Both have high-end zero-creep triggers. The actions and barrels in both rifles are "blueprinted." One rifle is a .280 Ackley Improved. The other is a 7x57 Ackley Improved. Both rifles will consistently shoot 1/2" groups at 100 yards with the right handloads. The .280 AI, which is glass- and pillar-bedded in a formerly-quite-lovely Remington 700 Classic stock that clearly received some extra loving attention from the gunsmith before I received the rifle, is a little too light and kicks hard from the bench at the range, but is tolerable in the field. The 7x57 AI, which is in a modified Hogue all-weather stock, is too heavy to carry around all day in rough terrain, but kicks hardly at all.
Both rifles will accomplish any reasonable shooting objective I could ask of them. The 7x57 AI will do so in any weather anywhere.
Neither rifle cost more than $1500.
Why spend more?
TWD
NB: I have another semi-custom rifle getting a new barrel and a little work done to it at a high-end shop in Pleasanton, Texas, that maybe, just possibly, might finally get returned to me sometime in the next century--and yes, there's some genuine annoyance here about further months of delays for no justifiable reason I can see--but that's another story. No matter what the price tag is on a rifle, or who is building it, it shouldn't take 6 months or 9 months or a year to get a new barrel put on the rifle, have maybe two days of work done to the rifle (blueprinting, glass bedding, fixing the trigger), and finally get the thing back in one's hands. I might be able to rationalize a higher price with faster service, but it's awfully hard to do so when the high-end gunsmith ends up possessing the rifle for longer than its owner does. TWD
Ok this thing is a work of art like Salvador Dahli's percistence of time. Yeah right (I know a lot of you are scratching your head wondering how my redneck a$$ got that one) I wish they would have reprinted last weeks comment they are just as accurate today. You know Dave your getting up there with Craig Boddington on your wonderful coverage of irrelevent items that no one here can/would afford.
Is there not a new gun out there that we can all afford that some one could read about??
How bought a history piece on John Browning, Sam Colt, or Jim Beam or Jack Daniels? Just trying to be helpful I hope the F&S gods don't smite me down for this one! LOL
I just want to know how the final total was arrived at. How do you get 14k for what is essentially semi-custom work, where a fully custom rifle from someone like Mark Bansner is a fraction of the cost? I would undertand it more if there was intricate hand detailing of metal or wood using some old-world technique, but this rifle lacks that artistic hand finishing. I know, I know, the pains-taking hand work went into making the rifle dead reliable. Again, there are a plethora of gunsmiths who I believe could do the exact same for a lot less. Ultimately, I guess I'm not jealous of the rifle, but of the guy who figured out how to make more money than his peers for the same product.
Maybe so. But they still shoot MOA, are highly reliable, and don't cost $14K. And if a synthstocked Wally World special is a "boat paddle," it's at least much less expensive than a $14K synthstocked boat boat paddle.
For $14K I am confident that I could find a rifle that's the equal, with outstanding finish, a fine wood stock, and some tasteful engraving. And I think that's the main point people have been making in this discussion.
For a lot less I could get a Mannlicher Schoenauer in outstanding condition. Who'd want something like the Legend when they can own something that is less expensive, better machined, better looking, and a true legend by virtue of its record of use, rather than something that is literally a "legend" only in name?
I'm sure Mr. Nichols rifles do their jobs very well. But for $14K? And I suppose it just rubs me the wrong way a little to have the obvious hype in name selection. It's kinda presumptuous to name something a "legend" when it's a new product in comparison with the rest of the market.
When I think of legendary rifles, I think of the Winchester 73, the Mannlicher-Schoenauers of the 1950s, the Lee Enfield, the Sharps buffalo rifles, the M1 Garand, the Winchester Model 70, almost anything made by Holland and Holland, and the Mauser 98. Even the Krag U.S. and the Weatherby Mark V deluxe are, by comparison with the Nichols product, "legends."
Nichols "legend" is just a very very expensive, well built, ugly rifle. Why pay $14K for that when you can put a Swarovski or Leupold Scope on a Mannlicher Schoenauer 1956 in .458 Win Mag for less than $5K?
I acquired most of my heavy caliber rifles before synthetic stocks came to the market. In those bygone days, Remington, Winchester, Sako, and Browning produced two, so called heavy calibers, 375 H & H and 458 Win Mag. All four of these manufacturers sold them to the public with production stocks better suited for lighter calibers. Often the wood was not heavy or dense enough. Therefore, recoil splits in the grips and abusive recoil were not uncommon. Priced inexpensively, they sold well to us who hunted dangerous game, but if we could dig up the extra money, sometimes we bought semi custom British rifles or, indeed, custom U.S. rifles which would solve these problems.
The first time I read of synthetic stocks was in Jim Carmichels book "The Rifle" where he predicted them to be the wave of the future, inexpensive, stable, and almost indestructible.
Now we see gunsmithing entrepreneurs have taken these issues to even higher levels. Often, todays hunting intellectuals feel exotic calibers, high tech scopes, fine tuning, and weather proof stocks are more important than practice, practice, practice.
Alas, I must plead guilty to some of this myself.
To MLH: I doubt very much whether D'Arcy will switch to the new Model 70 trigger. It's an unproved mechanism, and the original is the best trigger ever put on a sporting rifle.
To Beekeeper: I'm glad you're less bitter. Keep working on it. You might be interested to know that about 15 years ago, I held in my soft sweaty hands one Rolex that was worth $980,000 and another that was worth a million even. Did I get to keep them? No I did not.
To Jim in Mo. The action goes beyond slick. The bolt seems to fly back and forth by itself. I've never used anything quite like it.
On the accuracy issue: Getting a rifle like this to shoot closer than it does would be pointless; the rifle is intended for dangerous game which means lion (450 pounds) at the smallest to elephant (12,000 pounds) AT RANGES OF 100 YARDS OR LESS. USUALLY A HELL OF A LOT LESS. Why do you want a minute of angle rifle for this kind of work unless your brain is soft?
About looks: It was the owner's intention to have a walnut stock made, but the rifle went into service immediately and has stayed there. Someday it will get done.
About Jim Carmichel's gun collection: I don't know if I'm at liberty to comment.
Go, Shootstir...
How far must one go before someone is foolish, over a rifle? Even if one hits yon barn.
How about something on old German rifles, guys? Or, customizing one we already have?
Blue
WA Mtnhunter:
I don't own a $2000 rifle either. Until recently I was lucky to own a $2000 CAR. All I wanted to say was that for $14,000 you can get a mighty fine rifle with a custom barrel, good stock and sights, all the bells, and have $12,000 left over. I'm sure the Echols rifle is smoother and nicer than the Kimber, but is it BETTER?
David Petzal:
I've never shot at any animal that was going to charge me if I missed it, so you have me there. But our troops use a $1000 semi-auto rifle on terrorists who shoot back. If reliable performance under stress is what we are after, maybe we ought to shoot dangerous game with ARs chambered for .458 SOCOM.
Oh, and go ahead and comment on all the blue steel .308s on Carmichael's for sale pile. Nice rifles, but he's obviously saving the real good stuff for himself.
Dave one more thought and then I am done with the Legend. In reality are not these rifles to be considered semi-customs or even semi-production rifles? They are not created one at a time to the buyer's specifications unless things have changed in the last few years. I believe D'arcy makes them up a few at a time so you can buy your copy which is exactly like the next guy's gun, except possibly the selection of caliber, who is willing to drop the 14 grand. Good way of doing business if you can pull it off. Roy Weatherby used to tell us how much better his rifles were than anyone else's so he could charge more than Remchester. They were prettier no doubt about that.
Beekeeper,
I used to think that the Rolex watch was the thing to have on your wrist to show "you've made it". Then I found out their time keeping ability wasn't any better than a Timex.
Oh, I imagine the action is slicker than snot, as is probably most of the rest of this rifle. I just can't get into it.
Not that I wouldn't love a rifle like this (in .270) mind you, but this is a hand-finished rifle, not hand made. McMillan makes the stock, Krieger makes the barrel, and Winchester makes the actions. Yes he puts it together and trues everything up nicely, but it's hard to see where the $14 thou went. My $400 Remington stainless .30-06 would outshoot this one, too. Sorry.
To be continued? Again?
Man, that Mossberg piece really got under your skin didn't it Dave?
Jim
P.S. Dave, I shot my mossy 500 today. It sure is sweet......hahahahah
My how we get worked up on this thing. Last week Phil talked about a working mans gun and this week Dave comes out talking about something on the top shelf most of us can't reach. I read and have read this magazine most of my life for exactly that reason. I get to see both sides and get an education about guns I may never see. I read about 10000 to20000 dollar elk hunts on here for the same reason. I may never get to go on one but all hunting, fishing and shooting is what I love not just what I can afford. But there is also advice and articles on what I can. Dave has been providing me with an education for years. And while I may never have a need for it there may come a time when I am around people who are discussing and I will know atleast a little about it. Thanks Dave!
No one wants to be irrelevant...but this focus is just about there. A dangerous game rifle, over-tricked, and under-performing...at $14,000 smackers.
Let's change the subject...??
Blue
Nope, still not interested. Like others have said, there's not a lot done here that isn't available on other rifles for a small percentage of this.
I've seen car mods like this. Totally unnecessary, but mostly done for the "cool" factor.
This seems a rifle for the "But it's a $14,000 rifle!" crowd. I think a serious shooter has much more fun out-shooting their friends with plainer, less expensive rifles. I sure do.
Question for all ye bearers of Sour Grapes:
How much do you think the engineering, testing, tooling, labor, and overhead expenses cost for your cheap $400 Savage or your $500 Remington?
Answer; Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars. Just with the big guys, the cost is spread over a hundred thousand units or more, not 20 per year.
A fine rifle like this should be admired as art of the craft, not whining about how much it costs, how you can't afford it, and how your Wally-rifle will outshoot it. Me, I have no practical purpose for such a rifle. It's a good thing, since I can't afford it or the safari to use it either.
I appreciate guns ... all guns. And I like to learn about all of them, whether I can afford them or not. Having an engineering background I appreciate hearing about the details and thoughts that go into them. I might just learn a couple of things that could go into a gun I own or want to customize. From what I am seeing, when you start adding up all the things he does to the gun the cost adds up pretty quickly. And if D'Arcy Echols can build a reputation where he can charge the prices he does then more power to him. Like Petzel said, it is like comparing a street Chevy to its race bred namesake. The car owner still admires the race car, even though it is not for him.
It's not that I wouldn't spend that kind of change on a firearm. I would if I had it, but I'd try for a vintage double or magazine rifle that has been putting big holes in nasty animals for many years and will likely continue to do so. To each his or her own is my philosophy. Is Mark-1 making anyone else hungry? I eat a lot of ketchup. And if that expensive wine is so good, why don't they make it in orange flavor? Mmmmm!
i think a 14K rifle that is a repeater, in a calibre that will stop a charging buff, and goes boom everytime the trigger is pulled is worth every penny. african dangerous game hunters dont buy rifles on what they do right now, but what they will do when thee wrong thing happens. i cant afford one, but i cant afford to got to africa either.
what a waste of time,, in these tough economic times a 14k rifle looks like a really bad idea
It might be that accurate but until this article, I had not heard of this gun at all. I think there is a reason why too. A $14,000 reason why. Not many hunters, especially now, are going to spend that kind of money on a rifle when they can get one for much much less than half that amount. Even half the amount would buy a nice rifle and scope that could have the same accuracy. I think this might be one of those guns that people like to brag about and how expensive it is and its' capabilities...
I have a customer who drives a Ford Explorer and a Bentley. I asked him why he got the Bentley. He said he didn't want one until he test drove it.
WAMTN Hunter:
I have no need for a l4K firearm, my 700's do just fine aand this new MArlin XL7 on the bench is doing great. I only bought the Marlin as a 4 wheeler gun and tuck haul about. Some places i ride the 4 wheelr are death on pretty Walnut.
I also hope I can find enough $$$$ to go back to the Rockies this fall, but things not looking as if I will be able to. I can't drive that distance, I must fly and my wife goes along. We stay in a Motel and et out, so it's a costly trip. But, the 14k would allow me to make 2 trips, maybe another gun, that I dont; need but would like to own.But been around long enough to know my want's will not kill me.I'm just thankful to hunt and use what I got, which is enough. High Dollar equiptment is no better than cheaper( I got a Custom Mauser and it sits) if you use it proper and pratice enough. As long as I can put 3 rounds in a 2-3" circle at 200 yds i'm pleased. Shoot-um-straight and often
It might. But if the standard of accuracy is really "minute of pie plate" much less "minute of cape buffalo" then pretty much any OTC rifle in the desired cartridge will do the job every bit as well, for less than 1/10th the price.
I don't see why this gun is any more of an heirloom than the shotguns and rifles I inherited from my dad and grandad. They have stories and history and though they didn't cost $14,000 they are pricless to me.
Mike Diehl
Good point! I think I own a few Taurus' and Cavalier's myself. The closest thing I have to heirloom is a Weatherby Mark V that my wife gave me on our 30th wedding anniversary and my Remington 700 .35 Whelen which has killed all the elk and a majority of the deer I have taken. Those two, my single shot Stevens 94, and my S&W service revolver will leave my possession when I am no longer able to use them. The rest are simply possessions and toys.
Mark-1
I am glad to hear that you had the wisdom to own a .35 Whelen. My son will get mine, too.
WMH
The "Legend" is not the kind of rifle that would pass for an heirloom in my extended family. There's no question that it is reliable and the fit and finish are good, but it's not attractive in any way.
I've got a heavily used Mannlicher -- the one in my avatar. It's utilitarian as well. My grandfather modified the bolt handle. I added a real recoil pad. It has been in our family three generations. It has taken many deer, including my first deer, that I shot when I was hunting with my dad more than 25 years ago. Its real market value is maybe in the area of a thousand dollars. But in my view, it's a BETTER engineered rifle than the Legend, and it's a better looking rifle than any synthetic stocked firearm ever will be. Even if it did not have a cherished family history, I wouldn't trade it for a "Legend" on an even swap.
The initial defense of the expense associated with the "Legend" in this blog was that it is very accurate. We have all noted that very accurate OTC rifles don't cost nearly as much. In response, the defenders of the $14K price tag said in effect "accuracy doesn't matter as long as you can hit a charging buffalo." That's rather an admission that the extra $13K you spent accurizing that rifle doesn't matter.
So what's the defense of the $14K price? It doesn't look like a good rifle; it couldn't with a synthetic stock. The bluing is nothing special. It has no visual embellishments. It's "virtue" seems to amount to an unsubstantiated claim that it "must be better because it cost alot more than an OTC rifle that has the same functionality."
I can get a new accustocked, accutrigger, Savage rifle that is every bit as reliable and accurate as the $14K job and in the same round. Why in heaven's name would I pay $14K for a rifle when I can pay a thousand or less for identical quality?
Heirloom firearms come in two flavors. The ones we love because of the experiences that we recall, or the ancestral stories associated with it, and the ones that are ultra high quality good looking firearms. If I had $14K to spend on an heirloom, I'd buy pristine Mannlicher with a nice scope and save lots of money, or I'd buy an A.H.Fox shotgun. The "Legend" wouldn't make my long list, much less my short list, even if it were offered in my favorite round, the .30-06. It's a utilitarian rifle, and anything it can do can be done by an OTC rifle for far less money.
If people are buying them then he's not overcharging and he's meeting a need. If they are lined up then just the opposite.
Dave - Is he switching over to the new MOA Trigger system on the new guns? Or will he stay with the old style? I'd be curious why in either case.
Top flight riflesmiths, like Echols, are like other artists. It takes years to get established and to get a name for yourself and a clientele. After you do all that and work your butt off and put up with fickle customers, you can charge accordingly. I don't begrudge Mr. Echols in the least.
Also curious why he lengthened the ejection port (rear, front, both?). Seems lengthening it could weaken the action just a bit - has to have a darn good reason on a rifle like this. Did he also change the ejector blade length and material? Also intrigued by the size of the forward lug, and that he developed his own mag box and follower out of stainless. Doesn't look like there is a muzzle brake. Obviously, lots of thought went into the gun. Looking forward to part III.
Dave,
I'm almost done testing tents and have a little free time coming up. How about sending that thing over with a case of ammo and I will give it a good going over for you free of charge. Oh the going over will be free. Like the tents I get to keep the rifle right?
NOS Dave but have you checked the Damascus knives made by Percival Roberts? He's making me a patch knife for my Flinter and a hunting knife both with Ivory handles. He's at www.capt.plroberts@yahoo.com.
Out of pretty wood too!
I'd like to see just how smooth these actions REALLY are. According to every gun editor in the country the really old Model 70's were slicker than greased lightening anyway so why not just invest in those?
If you look at many custom rifles once you break into calibers over .308 and especially over .338 MOA guarantees are hard to come by much less to achieve. I know 400 of you have a 338 win mag that shoots MOA but they are a lot more that don't and its a simple fact is its harder to so in bigger calibers.That is unless you have a 25 pound solid block of metal benchrest machine that looks much like a prooving barrel. What I am talking about is a gun you can actualy carry hunting. Beside if you have a .400+ caliber gun shooting a 1.3 inch group is gonna look quite nice considering the size of the holes you leave in the paper. Now would I try to save up over the year for a 14K anything firearm, hell no. But when my powerball numbers come thru for me watch out.
Even though I can't afford rifles like this (yet), I still enjoy reading about them, as I do most topics in your column. Then again, I also like to look at supermodels, admire sports cars, and read about hunting in Africa, so I may be a little weird.
Don't let the naysayers force you to write about topics that don't excite you.
I own some custom arms, but my definition of "custom" seems not to apply on this blog. By custom, what I mean is built for me, and me alone, length of pull is a little longer than factory, drop a little more, bedding 1.5-2" forward of recoil lug, caliber & twist specified by me, action trued, tested on Rockwell gauge, bolt lugs lapped to action and all metal finished glass smooth and blued or Parkerized as the case may be. The last one I purchased is a .338/06 that cost just under one thousand bucks. Pillar and glass bedded, tiger maple stock, Shilen
barrel, Shilen trigger, and grouped .785 at 100yds the very first 5 shots I fired after sighting in. That was with Nozler factory loads.
Granted, mine is a 700 Rem., not a mod70 south paw, which I wouldn't have any use for anyway, also not a magnum, which I wouldn't have any use for either, but I wouldn't trade rifle for rifle, even Steven.
What I'm trying to say here is, a custom rifle is like a custom car, one of a kind, like I want it to be.
But if he can sell his work for such a ridiculous price, he probably could become a multi-millionaire by selling Florida water front building sites, and not have to work such long hours
The reason most big bore rifles are singles and doubles is because the recoil would ruin most open action type rifles in short order. Ever see a locking lug sheered off? When being charged by a large critter intent on your demise, having 4 shots is like having 2 guns, and in such a circumstance 'the more the merrier'. Building a bolt gun to handle the task season afer season is an accomplishment at any price. So the question then is,"How much would you pay to avoid being mauled, gored or trampled?"
Dave, have you looked at the April 13, 2009 issue of Gun Digest yet? You will find two full pages (74-75)of Jim Carmichel's guns for sale. Most of them are new unfired guns. Do all you writers get so many free guns that when you retire you have to sell off the extra ones. Notice that most of them have a personal serial number that was reserved for Mr Carmichel. With this many spare guns laying around I suppose you can afford lots of nice guns. You can look at the guns at www.connecticutshotgun.com
14 thousand and the damn thing doesn't even come with a bolt...ouch.
(For those of you that read the magazine follower, my tongue is firmly in my cheek.)
Another overpriced and completely irrelevant piece of equipment. My Encore will outshoot it with any of the five barrels I own and even if I had that kind of money to waste it would be on a trip of a lifetime and not a gun safe stuffer.
platte river rat
Wow! What a collection of firearms for sale at Connecticut Shotgun. Thanks for the link.
Notice Jim is not selling any of his rifles chambered in .280!
WMH
To paraphrase a line, it seems to me the "Legend" is a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist. If people (read: fools) want to pay $14,000 for a rifle that your local gunsmith, or Kimber or Winchester or Remington, will gladly build for you at about 1/10th of Echols' ("Legend"ary) $14k price, so be it, but I will not be one of them.
Here's an idea: Maybe Mr. Echols should go work for AIG. The top people there want an awful lot for the awful little they produce, too.
TWD
How much of what is done here could be built into a factory rifle? It seems that by the time the rework is done most of the rifle has been thrown out and replaced. Seems to me that if factory rifles started with the good parts (like a good trigger or lengthend ejection port) a lot of this could be done for maybe a little higher cost, not the cost of 7 or 10 extra rifles.
If you loan it to me I'll say some nice things about it too...
I double dog dare you to do something about a Mossberg rifle. Lever or bolt take your choice, just for fun. It doesn't always have to be high end stuff you can throw a curve ball every once in a while. I won't tell.
Talk about incentive!
I have all the rifles I'll probably ever need, A s/s 12 gauge, a lever action 30/30 and a lever action 22.
Now what I need first are some books and some tools. I'll work on checkering and finish first the move on to engraving or trigger pull. Working on MOA is something that requires a lot of work on me, not so much on the rifle.
I won't spend 14k and in the mean time I'll have a lot of fun.
When I'm done, if you've got 7k I'll give you a bargain.
WA Mtnhunter, there is a vast difference between "could" afford and "would." I don't want to compare balance sheets with you or anyone else; I do O.K. for me and mine. I think the issue people are discussing here is the value for the money. See my previous comment on part one regarding centerfolds. I like reading about rifles like this one as well, and the purchase price wouldn't make a good down payment on some of the ones featured in the Double Gun and Single Shot Journal. That being said, I also enjoy articles about Mossbergs and other makes that frankly offer a lot more bang for the buck.
Hell, I can't afford a $2,000 rifle. Not even a $500 one right now. I am grateful for the 10 rifles, 7 shotguns, 6 pistols, and 1 22/20 ga combo gun that I possess. Only 2 of them cost me more than $400 and those 2 were less than $1,000 and everyone is a real shooter lest they be gone.
I would be ashamed to compare balance sheets with almost anyone who can afford a computer to read this blog! My point is that we should not be so quick to criticize Mr. Echols' creation with an attitude. My Taurus was as reliable as any Bentley ever made, yet don't compare the two. Affordability is all relative.
I did not intend to offend anyone with my comments. like old Gunslinger says, "shoot um straight and often".
Maybe we're all missing the point here. Maybe this is God's way of telling us that unless we love house cats and put up with their hair and fragrance in our homes that we'll never be able to afford firearms we really don't need.
WA Mtnhunter, I wasn't trying to test anyone's boiling point. just, passing on some info. I have two rifles in 280 Rem too. A Ruger#1B and a Remington Mtn rifle. they will two of my guns that will pass on to family members.As far as balance sheets goes who cares---take care of your fmily first--- then do your hobby things. Money isn't something to be worshiped---its just a tool you receive for honest labor.
platte river rat,
I checked out those guns and I checked out those prices. Does Carmichael think we're fools? Not one of those Rem 700 were worth a dime more than today's prices, if that.
Well Dave, can you comment on how many gun safes Mr. Carmichel has? Good lord CS only posted the guns they've received so far. As someone else posted I too went to that site looking for one of Jim's beloved .280's. Truth be told when I first went to buy a big game rifle I looked for a 280, mostly on his good word. But with limited funds the manufacturers that did chamber for them, I couldn't afford at the time.
You are right on the money, WA Mtnhunter, it's all relative. Nobody really needs a $14,000 rifle, but I'd sure like to have one. I like the looks of Ed Brown's "custom" rifles for the money, but horses for courses as our British friends say. We are having a heated agreement.
There are MANY many more important things you could do with 14K than buy a rifle. Put you kids through college, pay off your car. I hate to say it but the thought of using that much money on something like a firearm is almost revolting.
I'm not entirely against the gun, I just don't see it as a value. If I were an AIG exec and getting my million out of the Dems and were inclined to shoot a charging buff from twenty paces things would certainly be different. I wouldn't be looking for value, I would be looking to impress and keep myself alive and this gun fits the bill. But I'm not and Rem 700's (not the matte) and Vanguards pretty much are where I'm at. Of course I didn't actually use either one this year but I had fun with a No. 1A... I guess it's nice to know they're around but if I'm looking at something I can't buy anyways I'm sticking with "show me pretty".
Gunslinger
I'm with you. For $14K, I can go to Colorado hunting at least 6 times, well, maybe just 4 on my hillbilly deluxe plan. I don't have any rich relatives, so the chances of me ever having enough loose change to go to Africa on a hunt are slim and none. And Slim just left town.
Take care
Accurizing doesnt cost that much as this rifle,but a fool is found everyday. I accurized my AR15 for 300 $ and it shoots 3/4 inch at 100 yards. They say that rifle is an 1 1/2 grouper? I would be embarassed.
I'd like to have friends that could afford this rifle. They'd be good friends and let me shoot it from time to time. And for those putting down the accuracy of the rifle, 1.5 MOA out of a .404 Jeffrey or any other stopping rifle is pretty damn good. Your .223 may group into .3 MOA, but it would just piss off a Cape Buffalo.
That old Ford Taurus will get you to Wal-Mart just as well as that Bentley or Rolls Royce, just not in style! Your $2.99 stocking cap from the truck stop will keep your ears warm, just not in the "style" that my Stormy Kromer will! Some things never end! LOL
WAMtnHunter -
If an OTC Remington or Ruger is a "Ford Taurus" among rifles, then the "Legend" is a "Chevy Cavalier" with an additional $13K of chrome and bumper stickers.
Checked out Carmichael's Collection up for sale. Unless I missed something Ol'Mike's only selling production guns. I thought he might be selling some of those rifles he built himself. Bummer!!!!
Still can't believe the number of you characters built on the cheap. Where do you go with Marlin bolt action or a Vanguard? A custom gunsmith could could put his heart and soul into trying to rework these gas pipes and you'd still come out with POS.
I always see my first comment got a minus nine comments!!! At least I found you guys read what I write. :-)
Good Point Big Daddy! These type of guns have magic/souls as well as a story that are passed on! Case in point:
I recently passed on my Beretta 686 EL to my son who separated from the USA last year and is a conservation law major now. I also passed on to him my custom-built mauser 35 Whelen. The rifle was built when the idea of hunting Alaska was a remote dream, but the rifle and me manifested the dream 3x’s and South Africa. The Beretta also made Alaska and SA, has taken 14 club championships, untold waterfowl and pheasants. Both guns will be passed on my son to his son. The Cycle continues!!!!!
Neither gun is in the class of our Legend, but neither is a Clunker either that will see a pawn shop.
Mr. Diehl . . .
You and I do not agree about everything, but concerning your comment above re the "Legend" (and its legendary price), I agree with you 100%. I'll take a Kimber if I want something fancy. I'll take a Savage if I want something I can count on anywhere, anytime, that doesn't cost much. And I'll defer to my local gunsmith and provide him with an action and $1500 and be happy when he gives me a custom-fitted rifle that will do anything the Legend will do, and just as reliably and accurately.
But $14K? That just sounds crazy to me.
TWD
If i ever want to really treat myself(i do someday) I'll buy a Kimber, but then I'd have a guilty consience about it, knowing that money could've went towards the mortgage or college-funds.
GUNSLINGER
Right you are! Our basic utility rifles will certainly do the job for 99.9 percent of us. I just can't understand the negative comments on this 14K rifle. Of course we can't afford it. Most of us can't afford many of the things we admire or at least like to look at. If the rich boys want to spend money on stuff like that, have at it.
It just seems to me that many of these negative comments are born of pure green envy and it ain't pretty!
I just hope that I can afford to go back to Colorado again this year. It looks like it may be a budget trip this year. Planning one less night on the road each way, setting a stricter grub budget, staying at a cheaper place, etc. I don't need any new guns or gear. Just time and oportunity to use what I have. I have plenty of ammo for my elk rifle and backup rifle, so the ammo crunch doesn't matter either.
WMH
A gun like that gets handed down to the next generation big game hunter in the family. You guys are obsessing on the comparative prices between your Remington 700s etal and a purpose built hierloom rifle throwing out 400gr bullets that would stop a charging lion in it's tracks after a few days abuse fording rivers and miles of bush and brush. Whoever inherits the rifle will no doubt inherit the stories of it's hunts and all that is worth. I doubt many accolades will be bestowed upon any of the thousands of worn out old deer rifles most of have to leave.
Dr R,
If you can't understand and see it now, you never will.
...Certainly enjoy the treasures you have and be proud.
If they did all the things suggested for factory rifles, most of you could not afford them!
How many of you shell out $1,200 - $1,400 for a basic Weatherby Mk V or do you go to Wally World for your $390 Vanguard or matte finished (ruster) Remington 700?
Those Mossberg rifles make mighty fine boat paddles and Hi-Lift jack handles.
-Don't waste your time serving these guys fine steak when all they want is a greasy hamburg with ketchup and jalapeños, and then wash it down with Mad Dog 20/20.
-I’m still trying to find MOA’s in these here woods. …Tough to find for an unprotected species.
-With a dangerous game rifle you hold on the brown and put a bullet into the mother.
Post a Comment