Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Petzal: A Carrier Landing Story

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

March 23, 2009

Petzal: A Carrier Landing Story

By David E. Petzal

This has absolutely nothing to do with guns, but since many of you have military backgrounds, or an interest in militaria, I thought I’d pass it along because it’s sweet and has a lot of heart. It was told to me by a former Navy aviator (call sign Cobra) who served during the Late Unpleasantness in Vietnam, and the incident took place on the carrier Coral Sea in the Gulf of Tonkin in 1972.

It was a day when heavy seas and horrendous weather made flying almost impossible, and the Coral Sea got all her planes in except an F-8 photo reconnaissance jet. The pilot (I will give him the call sign Fallen Sparrow) was having a bad day, and in rapid succession he got waved off, landed past the catch cables (a bolter, they call it), and had a hook skip. Now he was almost out of fuel so the Coral Sea sent up an A-6 tanker, which gave him a load of fuel, and he tried again.

He got waved off the first time for being too low; the second time for being too high; and on his sixth pass, he slammed the F-8 down on the deck, cut his engines in direct violation of landing procedure, and hooked up. He had made it.

The drill after you land is to turn off your lights, fold your wings, and taxi forward to park. But nothing happened. So the Air Boss (a savage, blood-drinking Commander) got on the horn to Fallen Sparrow, and said:

“You WILL turn off your lights, fold your wings, and taxi forward.”

Nothing.

The Air Boss said, “MISTER, DO YOU COPY ME?”

And from Fallen Sparrow came this reply in a very small, weak voice:

“Boss, do I interrupt you when you’re taking a s**t?

 

Comments (39)

Top Rated
All Comments
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

that's great! i laughed for a full minute on that one and had to share with some co-workers to get the lead out after a beautiful weekend here in the southeast.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Military "black" humor has got to be the best, especially pilot humor! When you live on the edge...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

The thing is... whether contrived, thought-out or spontaneous...

This stuff really happens. Some does get a bit "edited" after the fact, though.

My best examples can't be told in mixed company, or around minors (that's young'ns, not the people who dig stuff up).

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I'm surprised he waited until he landed,that man has a huge bagfull nonetheless.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Recon birds---Fly fast. Take pictures.

Also heard a Navy pilot say at an USAF field the old adage: Runway's long enough, but why is it so wide?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

If you know any of the old marine or navy vets who flew F4U Corsairs in WWII or Korea, they can tell you some hair raising stories relating to big four bladed props, brakes, and lots of RPM.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from s-kfry wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

THAT IS AWESOME!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

That's some funny Sh*t, for sure!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

All . . .

I doubt if the man suffered from constipation. More likely the other way around.

When one approaches the aft end of a carrier for purposes of landing his/her tactical jet, there's a lenses on the left side of the deck on the stern which all naval aviators care avidly about, and look at with utmost attention to detail. This moving light on a vertical pole is a fresnel lens; naval aviators--e.g., Navy and Marine tactical pilots--refer to it as the "meatball." The litany that future carrier aviators are taught from the moment they fly their first training missions in a tactical jet is "Meatball, Lineup, Angle of attack." The meatball, a ball of light on a vertical post, changes color according to whether you are high, low, or right on glidepath. A perfect meatball--e.g., you are right on glidepath--glows bright orange. It produces a wonderful feeling in the gut and heart of every carrier aviator. If you're too high or are going too high, the meatball changes from orange to white and you'll either "wave off" the approach or do a "bolter." If you're too low or are going too low, the meatball changes from orange to various shades of red. Bright red means you're really low and are about to crash into the stern of the ship and make a big mess. Problems with one's bowels can occur prior to and during such moments.

"Lineup" means whether you are right or left of centerline. Your margin of error is only a few feet (particularly with large planes like the F-14D or the A3D). If you drift right, your starboard wing will hit a parked airplane and set the stern of the ship on fire. See Problems With Bowels Dept. If you drift left, you may merely tumble off the port side of the ship, get sucked under, and chewed to pieces by any of the carrier's 4 giant propellors. Id.

"Angle of attack" refers to the angle of the aircraft through the air mass, and more particularly as your jet descends toward the ship. If your angle of attack is too low, your hook will very likely bounce off the deck and you'll get a "hook skip" and you'll have to "bolter" and try again. If your angle of attack is really low, you'll smack onto the deck in a flat position and likely cause damage to your landing gear. You'll certainly miss all 4 "wires."

When you hit the deck, your first rule is to always jam the throttles to max power so you can fly off the ship if your hook skips a wire. If you fail to ram your throttles to full power, or fail to obtain full power, you will either dribble off the bow of the ship into the sea, or will wobble off the bow of the ship, stall a few moments later, then drop into the drink. See Problems With Bowels Depart. Every naval aviator seeks an "Okay 3 Wire," which is a carrier landing without any errors. Every landing on the ship is always graded--without mercy. By the way, if your angle of attack is too high, and you are low, say, 1000' above the water or less, you'll likely stall the airplane and may crash and burn on the ship, or simply fall into the sea. Successful ejections from an out-of-control airplane at low altitude are frequently not. Id.

There is no greater, faster, more exciting ride than a Catapult shot (a "Catshot") off the ship, and no greater, more wonderful feeling when you've hit the deck than an "Okay 3 Wire". Being able to think about either event in the moments after it happens means you're still alive.

TWD

+12 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Thanks for carrier landing lesson TW;sounds like a nerve racking career!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

To T.W. Davidson: My thanks as well. Also, a correction: It should be Naval aviators, not Navy aviators.

In 1971, I and a bunch of publishing types got a tour of the Naval Air Station at Pensacola. The admiral commanding had gone through there in early 1942, graduating just in time to join the fleet for the Battle of Midway. He said that the Navy was so desperate for pilots at the time, that a classmate of his, who crashed five planes in a day, was graduated and sent overseas when he landed his sixth.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

As a kid, I wanted this to be my job. Not so much, now.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

As a confirmed "Blackshoe", the term most used by the rest of the Navy to describe Nasal Radiators is "Airedale". Those boys who land helo's on the pitching deck of a destroyer or frigate in the middle of the night have a large pair, as well. I made one carrier landing on USS Enterprise CVN-65 on a C-2 COD. Once was enough, never again.

U.S. Naval Aviation IS the pointy end of the spear. The first to arrive within striking range of some distant $h1thole in real need of a good air strike!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Dave:
Excellent story! I was aboard the U.S.S. Ranger (C.V.A.-61), that same year. It seemed like we had at least one incident every week. Unfortunately, at that time, we had very few planes designed for ground support.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

That was some funny s**t!
Ahhh, to reminisce, 'bout the good 'ol days ...thanks for explaining that TWD!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Thanks David, I can truly relate to that!

Replacing rivets under the left wing spoilers of a B-52 bomber when a young Airmen decided to ignore the do not operate tags in the cockpit and pressurized the hydraulic system, I jumped back just in time when he gave the wheel a hard turn to the right causing the spoilers to snap down busting the spoiler locks. I rolled down the inboard flap, lucky for the Airman; my Boss beat me to him! By the way, the spoiler crushed my toolbox!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from alabamahunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

After a rough day I really needed that. Reminds me of some stories my granddad has about flying over Austria and Germany during WWII. He was the bomber on a B-17 and had close calls on several occasions. One of the oddest is the the cocky ball-turret gunner that forgot to put his oxygen mask back on after making a trip the "restroom." Needless to say, he didn't make it back to the states alive.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Another good story Dave. It brings back memories of
my father in law Ltcdr (ret) John Schurman. He was a US Naval Aviator for 27 years. Starting in WWII he flew the big passenger planes for the Navy. Famous passengers included the Bob Hope troup. For quite a few years he was an instructor at Pensacola. John was also involved in the H-bomb testing and recieved an unhealthy dose of radiation. He had lots of good war stories, was a good friend and loved hunting and fishing. We lost him to bone cancer in 1986.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Zermoid wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I've heard carrier landing referred to as something between sex and a car crash, sound pretty accurate I guess.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jws wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

One thing about cats and traps (navy carrier takeoffs and landings), it is the most fun you can have with your clothes on! Day time cats and traps, it is the best carnival ride in the world. Night time cats and traps, you never get use to them, every single night time cat and trap scares the living you-know-what out of you.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I wonder what the Air Boss said to him after he said that?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

The Air Boss, said, after smiling, "OK, Son...be at my office at 0100...castration at 0130. The Doc will present, with Rum and sutures."

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

If naval aviators think they are a special breed, set apart from other flyers, it is only true. To fly a real hairy combat mission and then have the focus to land on a pitching carrier deck takes a special person. I fly a 1946 Luscombe taildragger and on a gusty day, it takes all of my small skill to get it on the ground safely.
Mark-1's earlier comment refers to the carrier pilot feeling comfortable landing crosswise on the runway, but wondering what the other 1 1/2 miles of asphalt is for.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Anyone care to take a stab as to what percentage of us are vets? I'll bet its pretty high. Also, I'll bet the number of Viet Nam Vets is way off the charts, relative to the general population. Maybe it's because we're too old to do anything besides read.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

All . . .

A few minor clarifications and further details . . .

About the Fresnel Lens, aka the "Meatball": the lens moves up and down on its vertical post in direct correlation to the pilot's glidepath. A perfectly centered bright orange meatball means the jet is right on glideslope. This is where a pilot feels warm and wonderful and happy, but it takes constant work and total focus to keep the ball centered, particularly if sea/wind conditions are less than optimal or the plane or pilot has a problem.

If the ball rises and turns lighter in color, you're going above glideslope. The Air Boss may become annoyed with you and tell you to Wave Off, but you're safe as long as your angle of attack is okay and you've got power on the plane and some fuel onboard.

If the ball descends and turns shades of red, you're falling below glideslope. In the language of naval aviators, "Red Means Dead" has nothing to do with communism. But it has everything to do with being too far below glideslope and crashing into the stern of the ship.

Long before you visually acquire the meatball your landing gear is down and locked, your hook is down, your harness is locked (so you don't smack face-first into the instrument panel when your hook catches a wire), and you've obtained the optimal angle of attack ("on speed" is the correct term) to bring the airplane onboard. Once you acquire the ball, you make a call to the Boss and make a simple, brief report. Though for me its been about 20 years, the call goes something like this: "Ryno 31, meatball, on speed with the gear, hook down, harness locked, 3000 lbs." You've just told the ship that you see the ball, that you're at the correct angle of attack (without which you won't get onboard) that your gear and hook are down, and what your remaining fuel state is, which instantly translates to the Boss and his staff how much time in the air you've got before you flame out or whether tankers need to be sent aloft.

While all this is happening, and while you're making constant tiny corrections to your power, your rudder and your ailerons--you almost never make any significant elevator corrections from here on in, although you will may make very, very tiny corrections of nose (elevator) trim to stay "on speed"; power controls glideslope--a person on the aft port side of the ship may become your personal God in terms of getting your plane safely onboard. This person is the "LSO," or Landing Signal Officer.

Carrier aviators agree that a reasonable and experienced LSO is worth more than his weight in any precious metal. An LSO particularly becomes vital when there is something wrong with the airplane, or with you, or when ship/weather conditions are crappy, or when any combination of these factors has turned your world to sh*t. A good LSO can detect a pending problem or trend with an airplane usually before its inexperienced pilot can, and all without any fancy instruments or measuring devices or high-tech gear, which is pretty amazing when you really stop and think about it. A good LSO (who is always a good pilot first) uses his training, his experience, his intuition, his empathy and his calibrated eyeballs to "see" problems with a plane and its pilot and fix or adjust them before things get out of hand.

Sometimes an LSO will say nothing more than a single soft word, almost a whisper: "Power." This means the pilot should advance one of his throttles by a millimeter, maybe two, to keep the aircraft from sinking below glidepath. Or the LSO might say, "Drifting left," which means the pilot has got to put a little rudder and maybe a little aileron the other way to stay on proper lineup or get back on proper lineup. But if, for example, the LSO shouts over the radio "POWER!!!", this means the pilot and his plane are in very deep sh*t and the pilot has instantly got to go to full afterburner, level his wings, forget all about the approach, and simply try to save his airplane.

A good LSO can sooth a frazzled pilot with a f*cked-up airplane, calm him down, and talk him onboard. I know this personally.

Great LSOs have more booze, money, and Really Friendly Women (as payback for their skills in keeping pilots alive) at their beck and call than anyone else on the ship.

A catshot is incredibly, incredibly violent. Sometimes instruments pop out of the panel during a catshot right into/onto the pilot's chest or lap.

There's a "Cat Grip" just in front of the throttle(s). This is a steel bar that is welded or bolted to the inside of the cockpit that you pull down, rotate into position, and hang onto for dear life with your fingers during a catshot while the throttles (at max thrust) rest in the palm of your hand. If you don't grab and hang onto the cat-grip before the catshot, the force of the shot, the massive instantaneous G-forces from the shot, will cause you to involuntarily yank your throttles to idle right as you're getting shot off the ship. This is fatal unless you are quickwitted enough to eject in time, and unless you are in a proper "ejection envelope" when you pull the handle.

Before you launch, you trim your elevators slightly nose up (so the plane will fly itself if you pass out during the shot), center your aileron trim (so your wings will stay level if you pass out during the shot), drop your flaps, run your engines to full throttle and grab the cat-grip and hold on tight, then check your panel for any problems. If everything looks good, you then salute the Cat Officer, which means you've just told the ship that you are good to go for launch. You then quickly position the stick so it just rests against the crook between your right thumb and index fingers while your elbow braces against your gut.

The Cat Officer looks over your airplane, salutes you back, then drops his hand to the deck and you're gone. In about a second and a half you'll accelerate from zero to 120kts or more, depending on your type of jet.

Like I said, a catshot is incredibly, incredibly violent. There's just nothing else like it. I grayed out on my very first catshot--from the U.S.S. Coral Sea, about a quarter of a century ago. Along the way, I'm man enough to admit that I may have incurred, maybe, just a little brown leakage during the shot. Things came back to focus for me in the air with the Boss very calmly, very gently telling me over the horn, "312, time to get your gear up now."

The Boss and everyone else all knew, of course. It happens to a lot of people on their first shot.

TWD

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I thought I was crazy until I read this shit...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

T.W.
What was your ride. We had A6's (all types) A7's, F4's RA5's and KA3's. The Phantoms and Corsairs seemed to be routine. The A6 was almost boring, except the payload was unbelievable, taking off. The designer of that plane should be in prison for forgetting the machine gun. The Vigilantes (RA5's) and Whales (KA3's) were an accident waiting to happen. We lost an RA5 when the tailhook snapped on landing. That plane just rolled right off the flight deck. Both the crewmembers were lost. We also had a big problem with foreign objects in the jet intakes (FOD), where planes would be launched by the cat, but the engines would die because of this FOD. Those planes would plop into the ocean. I still think of those men that we lost, what they would be doing today, and of course,their families.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

The planes I qualified to land on carriers were the T-2 Buckeye and the A-4J Skyhawk. My fleet aircraft was the RF-4 Phantom II, a reconnaissance variation of the F-4 Phantom fighter.

The Phantom was incredibly fast, brutally powerful, far from pretty. Though very tough and reliable, its rate of turn and turn radius were less than optimal when compared to next generation fighters. It made an excellent reconnaissance platform, though. The RF loved to go very, very fast at very low altitude. Standard long-range cruise at low altitude on a long reconnaissance run was 480 kts. indicated airspeed (low altitude as in 500' above ground or less, and sometimes much less); 540 kts. if you had a shorter run or were in more of a hurry; and 640 kts. +++ if you had a reason to go fast, depending on whether you lit up your afterburners. If you had a "clean" airplane--e.g., no external tanks of any kind--the RF's only real speed limitation was a "Canopy Overheat Light" which would come on when your canopy was approaching melting point from air friction.

I also have some time in OA-4J Skyhawks--the Skyhawk is a beautiful small tactical attack jet that one is said to strap on, rather than into. Though it lacked the brute power and supersonic capabilities of the Phantom, it had an almost immeasurable grace and beauty about it, and would always give you one or two really good, tight, fast turns in a dogfight (and if you needed more than that, you would lose the fight) before you ran out of energy. The plane was transsonic only if you pointed it straight down from very high altitude; its elevator controls would get goofy and the plane would shake and quiver once you entered the transsonic region, at which point you would then (stupidly) wonder (once) how you were going to get out of it. Low level standard cruise, depending on your external load, was generally 420 kts. indicated airspeed, though the Scooter could go faster if you had a clean bird and cool air temperatures. The A-4 was a beautiful, beautiful airplane. The Blue Angels flew it for many years before transitioning to the F/A-18, a 4th generation fighter.

The T-2 was a powerful, manuverable (though fairly slow; 485 kts. was its never exceed speed), incredibly ugly twin-engine jet trainer that was also used as a tactical attack aircraft for a couple of decades by Argentina or Venezuela (I can't remember which). Neither the Phantom or the Skyhawk or the Buckeye, to the best of my knowledge, fly anymore in the U.S. inventory, though several allied countries around the world may still fly either the Phantom or the Skyhawk, or both.

The Air Force and Marines flew the RF-4. I initially trained in the RF by spending nearly a year flying Air Force RF-4s before I joined my Marine squadron. By the time I started flying Marine RFs, they were no longer carrier-based, though the USS Midway carried a detachment of Marine RFs for many years. At one point before I left my squadron, we began field carrier landing practice in anticipation of a possible detachment deployment to the USS Ranger or USS Midway, but for unknown reasons the deployment didn't occur. For a couple of years after my RF tour, I served as a jet flight instructor teaching people, among other things regarding Navy-Marine tactical jets and tactical aviation, how to land on carriers.

Eventually a love-hate relationship developed between the Corps and myself (and vice-versa). I left the service with my wings, an honorable discharge, a check and my rank (Captain) to go to law school. These days I look for excuses to write--as I've done here, my apologies, please forgive me--and would prefer to be a full-time writer.

TWD

+7 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

T.W.,

Wow that is quite a read. Always thought it must be rough on takeoff. You confirmed my thoughts.
On Jan 13,1972 I was an infantry squad leader in the 1 Bn 501st Inf., 101st Abn Div. (Screaming Eagles) My platoon was on patrol in the rocket belt outside Phu Bai. One day in very mountainous jungle I was the lucky guy. Just as I walked by a hidden land mine another soldier tripped it off. A tree shielded my body and the blast only got my left leg. Four others did not do as well. Being injured the least I was last one to get picked up by medivac bird. The chopper lowered a jungle penetrator to the ground they hooked me on and the crew chief started winching me up. About 20 feet from the UH-1's skids the winch jammed. The view of the countryside as that chopper flew in with me hanging underneath on a 1/4 in steel cable was a thing of beauty. The pilot flew very high and 2 Cobras flew escort to the nearest firebase to get me off the hook and in the bird. About a hundred soldiers stood on bunkers watching that Huey come in to the helipad. At the hospital two of my pals were critical and got sent home on a silver duster. The other 3 of us eventually returned to duty. Yep, I got to keep my leg. No, there was not one female Nurse to take care of us.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

To Del, TWD, and all other vets -
As a 29-year-old who came close to going to the Air Force Academy (but never attended, instead going to engineering school on full scholarship), may I just say thanks for anything and everything that each of you have done in service for this country. There are far too few awards and rewards for sacrifices made. This especially applies during times of conflict when sacrifices of the ultimate sort are often made. I have always wondered (but not regretted since I have an incredible wife and two unbelievable children) what life would be like had I chosen the military. If I had gone in to the Air Force, I would have graduated in May of 2001 - a mere 4 months before 9/11.
The majority of the books I read deal with either counterterrorism or military pursuits and I rarely read one without gaining an even greater appreciation for what our veterans have done to further this democracy. I do my best to thank every one I see in uniform, though I know there are several times that number who no longer wear a uniform. It seems like “my” generation is far too short on the thank-you’s and far too eager with the “me, me, me” attitude. This is no more readily apparent than with the dolts that we as a nation have elected to run this country.
Finally, TWD, keep the articles coming. I love learning about the stuff that I will never be able to do and that make our military the strongest one in the world. If you ever need someone to proof your writings, I would love to do so. I have a sickening habit of attention to detail when reading and it drives me mad to see misspellings, poor grammar or inconsistencies with stories.
Once again, thanks to each of you veterans who have made it possible for each of us to continue to voice our opinion and enjoy the pursuits of happiness that we undertake.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

To YooperJack:

My father served on the ranger from 1962 until 1966. I sure you saw alot of the same places as he. Luckily, he didn't go through with his engagement to the Phillipino woman while he was in the Navy, else I would not exist (at least not in my present form.)

Jerry A.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

YooperJack and Del:

Count me in. U.S.Army 1965-68. Co.A, 5th SFG(ABN),1stSF,Bien Hoa,RVN. Lt. Col. John(Rapid Fire) Hay was the C.O.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from KM wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

To TW Davidson,
The carrier landing and RF-4 info is interesting. I used to know a Marine RF-4 pilot from your squadron period who flamed out in a high altitude vertical climb. His restart and ability to convince his RIO not to punch out was an equally interesting story. You wouldn't happen to have known that guy, would you?
TBS C '84

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

KM . . .

Guilty as charged, circa around 1986 or early '87. I am that guy, the aggressive young fool who, along with his equally aggressive foolish backseater, decided we would see just exactly what a lightly loaded RF could do, and for how far, in a vertical climb. Things were going just fine until things went wrong--funny how that works. The flameout was not part of our intended flight plan, nor was seeing the airspeed indicator read zero knots while we were high above the earth, nor was our uncontrolled fall for several tens of thousands of feet--but we did manage to recover the airplane and get back to Bergstrom AFB, the jet unharmed and its occupants deeply chagrined, badly scared, and much wiser.

Yes, TBS C'84.

I do not, I'm sorry to say, remember the identity within your initials. Please enlighten me.

TWD

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Auburn Hunter,

My only son is a 29 year old Chemical Engineer and Pianist. He was highly recruited and like you went to school (A JAYHAWK!!) on a full scholarship. His Grandfather and I served a total of 47 years so I don't feel bad about him not serving in the military. Like him, maybe you can do more for your country where you are now.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

T.W. and KM,

Actually the military is close nit and really not all that large. Shortly after the great war ended my father-in-law USN MATS Pilot John Schurman was stationed at Norfolk. On Christmas eve he was headed home from across the pond in an empty plane and landed to refuel in the Azores. Moments after John began his takeoff the radio cracked and a voice asked if he had any empty seats to give some GI's a ride home. John aborted takeoff (a major no-no) and taxied back picked up several soldiers and took off. They landed on Christmas morning at Norfolk. Fast forward to the late 70's and John was the Commander of the local American Legion Post 153. One day at a party for Legion Officials a guy walked up and asked John if he had EVER aborted a takeoff. This was a one time thing and something he had never told anyone. Turns out it was the Soldier that called on the radio that long ago night and he wanted to thank John for getting him home to his family for Christmas.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Forgot to add John is buried in the Cemetery at Lancaster KS. His headstone has a DC-6 engraved on it. He was a great guy. Yesterday I posted a pic of him with his last Elk.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

To T. W. Davidson: If you would like to write professionally I think you should have a serious try at it. You are good enough.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

TWD - My offer still stands. I love to read and I would also love to get into editing, but very few tend to believe that electrical engineers make good editors.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Mr. Petzal . . .

Thank you for your encouragement. It means a great deal to me. Despite all the things I've done in my life, I envy what you do, and what other professional writers do. I write quite a bit, both in my work as an attorney and for stress relief and personal pleasure. For me, writing is just as demanding, just as draining, and even sometimes just as personally perilous as anything else I've ever done in my life, including flying a tactical jet. Words have power. I've seen them do great things. I've seen them do terrible things. I'd like to do some great things with words.

(By the way, I sent a story to F&S several months ago called "Crossing The River." A nice person from F&S by the name of Kristyn Brady emailed me and asked me to send the story again, which I did about a month ago or so. If you come across the story, I have a feeling you might like it. I would vastly appreciate your thoughts and comments about it.)

Thank you once again for your encouragement. I will double my efforts.

To auburn_hunter . . .

I accept your offer and would be very pleased to have a tough critic trim the rust and fat off my written words. I take constructive criticism very well, and I've sometimes been dazzled by how the simple twist of a word or phrase by a skilled editor can turn something good into something great.

Thank you for making the offer, and I hope I can do something for you in return. How should I contact you?

TWD <---> ThadJustice@yahoo.com

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Brennen James Harper wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

my uncle was in vietnam

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Dave,

Whut abut me I ar a gud writr 2 am I not? mebe I kud sind yu sum of my mane...manyu...er sampels of mi riting. Whut du yuo thank?

hahahaha just kidding, TWD is one of my favorites too!!!
T.W. please keep those great stories coming.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dgbroox wrote 2 years 39 weeks ago

Good stories!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

All . . .

I doubt if the man suffered from constipation. More likely the other way around.

When one approaches the aft end of a carrier for purposes of landing his/her tactical jet, there's a lenses on the left side of the deck on the stern which all naval aviators care avidly about, and look at with utmost attention to detail. This moving light on a vertical pole is a fresnel lens; naval aviators--e.g., Navy and Marine tactical pilots--refer to it as the "meatball." The litany that future carrier aviators are taught from the moment they fly their first training missions in a tactical jet is "Meatball, Lineup, Angle of attack." The meatball, a ball of light on a vertical post, changes color according to whether you are high, low, or right on glidepath. A perfect meatball--e.g., you are right on glidepath--glows bright orange. It produces a wonderful feeling in the gut and heart of every carrier aviator. If you're too high or are going too high, the meatball changes from orange to white and you'll either "wave off" the approach or do a "bolter." If you're too low or are going too low, the meatball changes from orange to various shades of red. Bright red means you're really low and are about to crash into the stern of the ship and make a big mess. Problems with one's bowels can occur prior to and during such moments.

"Lineup" means whether you are right or left of centerline. Your margin of error is only a few feet (particularly with large planes like the F-14D or the A3D). If you drift right, your starboard wing will hit a parked airplane and set the stern of the ship on fire. See Problems With Bowels Dept. If you drift left, you may merely tumble off the port side of the ship, get sucked under, and chewed to pieces by any of the carrier's 4 giant propellors. Id.

"Angle of attack" refers to the angle of the aircraft through the air mass, and more particularly as your jet descends toward the ship. If your angle of attack is too low, your hook will very likely bounce off the deck and you'll get a "hook skip" and you'll have to "bolter" and try again. If your angle of attack is really low, you'll smack onto the deck in a flat position and likely cause damage to your landing gear. You'll certainly miss all 4 "wires."

When you hit the deck, your first rule is to always jam the throttles to max power so you can fly off the ship if your hook skips a wire. If you fail to ram your throttles to full power, or fail to obtain full power, you will either dribble off the bow of the ship into the sea, or will wobble off the bow of the ship, stall a few moments later, then drop into the drink. See Problems With Bowels Depart. Every naval aviator seeks an "Okay 3 Wire," which is a carrier landing without any errors. Every landing on the ship is always graded--without mercy. By the way, if your angle of attack is too high, and you are low, say, 1000' above the water or less, you'll likely stall the airplane and may crash and burn on the ship, or simply fall into the sea. Successful ejections from an out-of-control airplane at low altitude are frequently not. Id.

There is no greater, faster, more exciting ride than a Catapult shot (a "Catshot") off the ship, and no greater, more wonderful feeling when you've hit the deck than an "Okay 3 Wire". Being able to think about either event in the moments after it happens means you're still alive.

TWD

+12 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

The planes I qualified to land on carriers were the T-2 Buckeye and the A-4J Skyhawk. My fleet aircraft was the RF-4 Phantom II, a reconnaissance variation of the F-4 Phantom fighter.

The Phantom was incredibly fast, brutally powerful, far from pretty. Though very tough and reliable, its rate of turn and turn radius were less than optimal when compared to next generation fighters. It made an excellent reconnaissance platform, though. The RF loved to go very, very fast at very low altitude. Standard long-range cruise at low altitude on a long reconnaissance run was 480 kts. indicated airspeed (low altitude as in 500' above ground or less, and sometimes much less); 540 kts. if you had a shorter run or were in more of a hurry; and 640 kts. +++ if you had a reason to go fast, depending on whether you lit up your afterburners. If you had a "clean" airplane--e.g., no external tanks of any kind--the RF's only real speed limitation was a "Canopy Overheat Light" which would come on when your canopy was approaching melting point from air friction.

I also have some time in OA-4J Skyhawks--the Skyhawk is a beautiful small tactical attack jet that one is said to strap on, rather than into. Though it lacked the brute power and supersonic capabilities of the Phantom, it had an almost immeasurable grace and beauty about it, and would always give you one or two really good, tight, fast turns in a dogfight (and if you needed more than that, you would lose the fight) before you ran out of energy. The plane was transsonic only if you pointed it straight down from very high altitude; its elevator controls would get goofy and the plane would shake and quiver once you entered the transsonic region, at which point you would then (stupidly) wonder (once) how you were going to get out of it. Low level standard cruise, depending on your external load, was generally 420 kts. indicated airspeed, though the Scooter could go faster if you had a clean bird and cool air temperatures. The A-4 was a beautiful, beautiful airplane. The Blue Angels flew it for many years before transitioning to the F/A-18, a 4th generation fighter.

The T-2 was a powerful, manuverable (though fairly slow; 485 kts. was its never exceed speed), incredibly ugly twin-engine jet trainer that was also used as a tactical attack aircraft for a couple of decades by Argentina or Venezuela (I can't remember which). Neither the Phantom or the Skyhawk or the Buckeye, to the best of my knowledge, fly anymore in the U.S. inventory, though several allied countries around the world may still fly either the Phantom or the Skyhawk, or both.

The Air Force and Marines flew the RF-4. I initially trained in the RF by spending nearly a year flying Air Force RF-4s before I joined my Marine squadron. By the time I started flying Marine RFs, they were no longer carrier-based, though the USS Midway carried a detachment of Marine RFs for many years. At one point before I left my squadron, we began field carrier landing practice in anticipation of a possible detachment deployment to the USS Ranger or USS Midway, but for unknown reasons the deployment didn't occur. For a couple of years after my RF tour, I served as a jet flight instructor teaching people, among other things regarding Navy-Marine tactical jets and tactical aviation, how to land on carriers.

Eventually a love-hate relationship developed between the Corps and myself (and vice-versa). I left the service with my wings, an honorable discharge, a check and my rank (Captain) to go to law school. These days I look for excuses to write--as I've done here, my apologies, please forgive me--and would prefer to be a full-time writer.

TWD

+7 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

To Del, TWD, and all other vets -
As a 29-year-old who came close to going to the Air Force Academy (but never attended, instead going to engineering school on full scholarship), may I just say thanks for anything and everything that each of you have done in service for this country. There are far too few awards and rewards for sacrifices made. This especially applies during times of conflict when sacrifices of the ultimate sort are often made. I have always wondered (but not regretted since I have an incredible wife and two unbelievable children) what life would be like had I chosen the military. If I had gone in to the Air Force, I would have graduated in May of 2001 - a mere 4 months before 9/11.
The majority of the books I read deal with either counterterrorism or military pursuits and I rarely read one without gaining an even greater appreciation for what our veterans have done to further this democracy. I do my best to thank every one I see in uniform, though I know there are several times that number who no longer wear a uniform. It seems like “my” generation is far too short on the thank-you’s and far too eager with the “me, me, me” attitude. This is no more readily apparent than with the dolts that we as a nation have elected to run this country.
Finally, TWD, keep the articles coming. I love learning about the stuff that I will never be able to do and that make our military the strongest one in the world. If you ever need someone to proof your writings, I would love to do so. I have a sickening habit of attention to detail when reading and it drives me mad to see misspellings, poor grammar or inconsistencies with stories.
Once again, thanks to each of you veterans who have made it possible for each of us to continue to voice our opinion and enjoy the pursuits of happiness that we undertake.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

All . . .

A few minor clarifications and further details . . .

About the Fresnel Lens, aka the "Meatball": the lens moves up and down on its vertical post in direct correlation to the pilot's glidepath. A perfectly centered bright orange meatball means the jet is right on glideslope. This is where a pilot feels warm and wonderful and happy, but it takes constant work and total focus to keep the ball centered, particularly if sea/wind conditions are less than optimal or the plane or pilot has a problem.

If the ball rises and turns lighter in color, you're going above glideslope. The Air Boss may become annoyed with you and tell you to Wave Off, but you're safe as long as your angle of attack is okay and you've got power on the plane and some fuel onboard.

If the ball descends and turns shades of red, you're falling below glideslope. In the language of naval aviators, "Red Means Dead" has nothing to do with communism. But it has everything to do with being too far below glideslope and crashing into the stern of the ship.

Long before you visually acquire the meatball your landing gear is down and locked, your hook is down, your harness is locked (so you don't smack face-first into the instrument panel when your hook catches a wire), and you've obtained the optimal angle of attack ("on speed" is the correct term) to bring the airplane onboard. Once you acquire the ball, you make a call to the Boss and make a simple, brief report. Though for me its been about 20 years, the call goes something like this: "Ryno 31, meatball, on speed with the gear, hook down, harness locked, 3000 lbs." You've just told the ship that you see the ball, that you're at the correct angle of attack (without which you won't get onboard) that your gear and hook are down, and what your remaining fuel state is, which instantly translates to the Boss and his staff how much time in the air you've got before you flame out or whether tankers need to be sent aloft.

While all this is happening, and while you're making constant tiny corrections to your power, your rudder and your ailerons--you almost never make any significant elevator corrections from here on in, although you will may make very, very tiny corrections of nose (elevator) trim to stay "on speed"; power controls glideslope--a person on the aft port side of the ship may become your personal God in terms of getting your plane safely onboard. This person is the "LSO," or Landing Signal Officer.

Carrier aviators agree that a reasonable and experienced LSO is worth more than his weight in any precious metal. An LSO particularly becomes vital when there is something wrong with the airplane, or with you, or when ship/weather conditions are crappy, or when any combination of these factors has turned your world to sh*t. A good LSO can detect a pending problem or trend with an airplane usually before its inexperienced pilot can, and all without any fancy instruments or measuring devices or high-tech gear, which is pretty amazing when you really stop and think about it. A good LSO (who is always a good pilot first) uses his training, his experience, his intuition, his empathy and his calibrated eyeballs to "see" problems with a plane and its pilot and fix or adjust them before things get out of hand.

Sometimes an LSO will say nothing more than a single soft word, almost a whisper: "Power." This means the pilot should advance one of his throttles by a millimeter, maybe two, to keep the aircraft from sinking below glidepath. Or the LSO might say, "Drifting left," which means the pilot has got to put a little rudder and maybe a little aileron the other way to stay on proper lineup or get back on proper lineup. But if, for example, the LSO shouts over the radio "POWER!!!", this means the pilot and his plane are in very deep sh*t and the pilot has instantly got to go to full afterburner, level his wings, forget all about the approach, and simply try to save his airplane.

A good LSO can sooth a frazzled pilot with a f*cked-up airplane, calm him down, and talk him onboard. I know this personally.

Great LSOs have more booze, money, and Really Friendly Women (as payback for their skills in keeping pilots alive) at their beck and call than anyone else on the ship.

A catshot is incredibly, incredibly violent. Sometimes instruments pop out of the panel during a catshot right into/onto the pilot's chest or lap.

There's a "Cat Grip" just in front of the throttle(s). This is a steel bar that is welded or bolted to the inside of the cockpit that you pull down, rotate into position, and hang onto for dear life with your fingers during a catshot while the throttles (at max thrust) rest in the palm of your hand. If you don't grab and hang onto the cat-grip before the catshot, the force of the shot, the massive instantaneous G-forces from the shot, will cause you to involuntarily yank your throttles to idle right as you're getting shot off the ship. This is fatal unless you are quickwitted enough to eject in time, and unless you are in a proper "ejection envelope" when you pull the handle.

Before you launch, you trim your elevators slightly nose up (so the plane will fly itself if you pass out during the shot), center your aileron trim (so your wings will stay level if you pass out during the shot), drop your flaps, run your engines to full throttle and grab the cat-grip and hold on tight, then check your panel for any problems. If everything looks good, you then salute the Cat Officer, which means you've just told the ship that you are good to go for launch. You then quickly position the stick so it just rests against the crook between your right thumb and index fingers while your elbow braces against your gut.

The Cat Officer looks over your airplane, salutes you back, then drops his hand to the deck and you're gone. In about a second and a half you'll accelerate from zero to 120kts or more, depending on your type of jet.

Like I said, a catshot is incredibly, incredibly violent. There's just nothing else like it. I grayed out on my very first catshot--from the U.S.S. Coral Sea, about a quarter of a century ago. Along the way, I'm man enough to admit that I may have incurred, maybe, just a little brown leakage during the shot. Things came back to focus for me in the air with the Boss very calmly, very gently telling me over the horn, "312, time to get your gear up now."

The Boss and everyone else all knew, of course. It happens to a lot of people on their first shot.

TWD

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

T.W. and KM,

Actually the military is close nit and really not all that large. Shortly after the great war ended my father-in-law USN MATS Pilot John Schurman was stationed at Norfolk. On Christmas eve he was headed home from across the pond in an empty plane and landed to refuel in the Azores. Moments after John began his takeoff the radio cracked and a voice asked if he had any empty seats to give some GI's a ride home. John aborted takeoff (a major no-no) and taxied back picked up several soldiers and took off. They landed on Christmas morning at Norfolk. Fast forward to the late 70's and John was the Commander of the local American Legion Post 153. One day at a party for Legion Officials a guy walked up and asked John if he had EVER aborted a takeoff. This was a one time thing and something he had never told anyone. Turns out it was the Soldier that called on the radio that long ago night and he wanted to thank John for getting him home to his family for Christmas.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Another good story Dave. It brings back memories of
my father in law Ltcdr (ret) John Schurman. He was a US Naval Aviator for 27 years. Starting in WWII he flew the big passenger planes for the Navy. Famous passengers included the Bob Hope troup. For quite a few years he was an instructor at Pensacola. John was also involved in the H-bomb testing and recieved an unhealthy dose of radiation. He had lots of good war stories, was a good friend and loved hunting and fishing. We lost him to bone cancer in 1986.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

T.W.,

Wow that is quite a read. Always thought it must be rough on takeoff. You confirmed my thoughts.
On Jan 13,1972 I was an infantry squad leader in the 1 Bn 501st Inf., 101st Abn Div. (Screaming Eagles) My platoon was on patrol in the rocket belt outside Phu Bai. One day in very mountainous jungle I was the lucky guy. Just as I walked by a hidden land mine another soldier tripped it off. A tree shielded my body and the blast only got my left leg. Four others did not do as well. Being injured the least I was last one to get picked up by medivac bird. The chopper lowered a jungle penetrator to the ground they hooked me on and the crew chief started winching me up. About 20 feet from the UH-1's skids the winch jammed. The view of the countryside as that chopper flew in with me hanging underneath on a 1/4 in steel cable was a thing of beauty. The pilot flew very high and 2 Cobras flew escort to the nearest firebase to get me off the hook and in the bird. About a hundred soldiers stood on bunkers watching that Huey come in to the helipad. At the hospital two of my pals were critical and got sent home on a silver duster. The other 3 of us eventually returned to duty. Yep, I got to keep my leg. No, there was not one female Nurse to take care of us.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

that's great! i laughed for a full minute on that one and had to share with some co-workers to get the lead out after a beautiful weekend here in the southeast.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Military "black" humor has got to be the best, especially pilot humor! When you live on the edge...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

The thing is... whether contrived, thought-out or spontaneous...

This stuff really happens. Some does get a bit "edited" after the fact, though.

My best examples can't be told in mixed company, or around minors (that's young'ns, not the people who dig stuff up).

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

That's some funny Sh*t, for sure!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

As a confirmed "Blackshoe", the term most used by the rest of the Navy to describe Nasal Radiators is "Airedale". Those boys who land helo's on the pitching deck of a destroyer or frigate in the middle of the night have a large pair, as well. I made one carrier landing on USS Enterprise CVN-65 on a C-2 COD. Once was enough, never again.

U.S. Naval Aviation IS the pointy end of the spear. The first to arrive within striking range of some distant $h1thole in real need of a good air strike!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Thanks David, I can truly relate to that!

Replacing rivets under the left wing spoilers of a B-52 bomber when a young Airmen decided to ignore the do not operate tags in the cockpit and pressurized the hydraulic system, I jumped back just in time when he gave the wheel a hard turn to the right causing the spoilers to snap down busting the spoiler locks. I rolled down the inboard flap, lucky for the Airman; my Boss beat me to him! By the way, the spoiler crushed my toolbox!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jws wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

One thing about cats and traps (navy carrier takeoffs and landings), it is the most fun you can have with your clothes on! Day time cats and traps, it is the best carnival ride in the world. Night time cats and traps, you never get use to them, every single night time cat and trap scares the living you-know-what out of you.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I wonder what the Air Boss said to him after he said that?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

The Air Boss, said, after smiling, "OK, Son...be at my office at 0100...castration at 0130. The Doc will present, with Rum and sutures."

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Anyone care to take a stab as to what percentage of us are vets? I'll bet its pretty high. Also, I'll bet the number of Viet Nam Vets is way off the charts, relative to the general population. Maybe it's because we're too old to do anything besides read.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

T.W.
What was your ride. We had A6's (all types) A7's, F4's RA5's and KA3's. The Phantoms and Corsairs seemed to be routine. The A6 was almost boring, except the payload was unbelievable, taking off. The designer of that plane should be in prison for forgetting the machine gun. The Vigilantes (RA5's) and Whales (KA3's) were an accident waiting to happen. We lost an RA5 when the tailhook snapped on landing. That plane just rolled right off the flight deck. Both the crewmembers were lost. We also had a big problem with foreign objects in the jet intakes (FOD), where planes would be launched by the cat, but the engines would die because of this FOD. Those planes would plop into the ocean. I still think of those men that we lost, what they would be doing today, and of course,their families.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

KM . . .

Guilty as charged, circa around 1986 or early '87. I am that guy, the aggressive young fool who, along with his equally aggressive foolish backseater, decided we would see just exactly what a lightly loaded RF could do, and for how far, in a vertical climb. Things were going just fine until things went wrong--funny how that works. The flameout was not part of our intended flight plan, nor was seeing the airspeed indicator read zero knots while we were high above the earth, nor was our uncontrolled fall for several tens of thousands of feet--but we did manage to recover the airplane and get back to Bergstrom AFB, the jet unharmed and its occupants deeply chagrined, badly scared, and much wiser.

Yes, TBS C'84.

I do not, I'm sorry to say, remember the identity within your initials. Please enlighten me.

TWD

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Auburn Hunter,

My only son is a 29 year old Chemical Engineer and Pianist. He was highly recruited and like you went to school (A JAYHAWK!!) on a full scholarship. His Grandfather and I served a total of 47 years so I don't feel bad about him not serving in the military. Like him, maybe you can do more for your country where you are now.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

To T. W. Davidson: If you would like to write professionally I think you should have a serious try at it. You are good enough.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

TWD - My offer still stands. I love to read and I would also love to get into editing, but very few tend to believe that electrical engineers make good editors.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Mr. Petzal . . .

Thank you for your encouragement. It means a great deal to me. Despite all the things I've done in my life, I envy what you do, and what other professional writers do. I write quite a bit, both in my work as an attorney and for stress relief and personal pleasure. For me, writing is just as demanding, just as draining, and even sometimes just as personally perilous as anything else I've ever done in my life, including flying a tactical jet. Words have power. I've seen them do great things. I've seen them do terrible things. I'd like to do some great things with words.

(By the way, I sent a story to F&S several months ago called "Crossing The River." A nice person from F&S by the name of Kristyn Brady emailed me and asked me to send the story again, which I did about a month ago or so. If you come across the story, I have a feeling you might like it. I would vastly appreciate your thoughts and comments about it.)

Thank you once again for your encouragement. I will double my efforts.

To auburn_hunter . . .

I accept your offer and would be very pleased to have a tough critic trim the rust and fat off my written words. I take constructive criticism very well, and I've sometimes been dazzled by how the simple twist of a word or phrase by a skilled editor can turn something good into something great.

Thank you for making the offer, and I hope I can do something for you in return. How should I contact you?

TWD <---> ThadJustice@yahoo.com

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I'm surprised he waited until he landed,that man has a huge bagfull nonetheless.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mark-1 wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Recon birds---Fly fast. Take pictures.

Also heard a Navy pilot say at an USAF field the old adage: Runway's long enough, but why is it so wide?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

If you know any of the old marine or navy vets who flew F4U Corsairs in WWII or Korea, they can tell you some hair raising stories relating to big four bladed props, brakes, and lots of RPM.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from s-kfry wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

THAT IS AWESOME!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Thanks for carrier landing lesson TW;sounds like a nerve racking career!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

To T.W. Davidson: My thanks as well. Also, a correction: It should be Naval aviators, not Navy aviators.

In 1971, I and a bunch of publishing types got a tour of the Naval Air Station at Pensacola. The admiral commanding had gone through there in early 1942, graduating just in time to join the fleet for the Battle of Midway. He said that the Navy was so desperate for pilots at the time, that a classmate of his, who crashed five planes in a day, was graduated and sent overseas when he landed his sixth.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

As a kid, I wanted this to be my job. Not so much, now.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from YooperJack wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

Dave:
Excellent story! I was aboard the U.S.S. Ranger (C.V.A.-61), that same year. It seemed like we had at least one incident every week. Unfortunately, at that time, we had very few planes designed for ground support.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

That was some funny s**t!
Ahhh, to reminisce, 'bout the good 'ol days ...thanks for explaining that TWD!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from alabamahunter wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

After a rough day I really needed that. Reminds me of some stories my granddad has about flying over Austria and Germany during WWII. He was the bomber on a B-17 and had close calls on several occasions. One of the oddest is the the cocky ball-turret gunner that forgot to put his oxygen mask back on after making a trip the "restroom." Needless to say, he didn't make it back to the states alive.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Zermoid wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I've heard carrier landing referred to as something between sex and a car crash, sound pretty accurate I guess.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

If naval aviators think they are a special breed, set apart from other flyers, it is only true. To fly a real hairy combat mission and then have the focus to land on a pitching carrier deck takes a special person. I fly a 1946 Luscombe taildragger and on a gusty day, it takes all of my small skill to get it on the ground safely.
Mark-1's earlier comment refers to the carrier pilot feeling comfortable landing crosswise on the runway, but wondering what the other 1 1/2 miles of asphalt is for.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dr. Ralph wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

I thought I was crazy until I read this shit...

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

To YooperJack:

My father served on the ranger from 1962 until 1966. I sure you saw alot of the same places as he. Luckily, he didn't go through with his engagement to the Phillipino woman while he was in the Navy, else I would not exist (at least not in my present form.)

Jerry A.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 46 weeks ago

YooperJack and Del:

Count me in. U.S.Army 1965-68. Co.A, 5th SFG(ABN),1stSF,Bien Hoa,RVN. Lt. Col. John(Rapid Fire) Hay was the C.O.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from KM wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

To TW Davidson,
The carrier landing and RF-4 info is interesting. I used to know a Marine RF-4 pilot from your squadron period who flamed out in a high altitude vertical climb. His restart and ability to convince his RIO not to punch out was an equally interesting story. You wouldn't happen to have known that guy, would you?
TBS C '84

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Forgot to add John is buried in the Cemetery at Lancaster KS. His headstone has a DC-6 engraved on it. He was a great guy. Yesterday I posted a pic of him with his last Elk.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Brennen James Harper wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

my uncle was in vietnam

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 45 weeks ago

Dave,

Whut abut me I ar a gud writr 2 am I not? mebe I kud sind yu sum of my mane...manyu...er sampels of mi riting. Whut du yuo thank?

hahahaha just kidding, TWD is one of my favorites too!!!
T.W. please keep those great stories coming.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dgbroox wrote 2 years 39 weeks ago

Good stories!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs