Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Bourjaily: Life Imitates Art

July 07, 2009

Bourjaily: Life Imitates Art

In TV and the movies, pumping a shotgun is erroneously presented as the necessary first step to firing it during a gunfight. It seems to me you’d make sure you had a round in the chamber before the shooting started.

Even good crime novelists like George Pelecanos and the great Elmore Leonard get it wrong. Pelecanos in particular will put characters in a tense armed standoff, then have someone say “I can shoot you before you have time to rack that pump.” In real life the immediate reply would be “Boom.”

And yet, sometimes life imitates art. According to the Iowa City Press-Citizen, here’s what happened last weekend when an argument that started in a bar continued in the street. The story was headlined:  Gun Malfunction Saves Victim (here in Iowa City, even a near-shooting is big news). It read, in part:

The victim told police that William “Rudy” Wright got out of a van, brandished a shotgun and pointed the weapon at the victim.

Wright racked the shotgun and was prepared to fire when a round ejected, causing a temporary distraction that allowed the victim enough time to run away, according to the police complaint. The victim told police he believed he was going to be shot had it not been for the round being accidentally ejected.

Although the reporter’s writing isn’t very clear, it’s pretty certain one of two things happened:

One:  The gun had an empty chamber, and it had timing problems. When the shooter tried to load a round from the magazine the carrier malfunctioned and the shell fell out of the magazine tube onto the ground. I’ve had a couple of pump guns that dropped shells from time to time.

Two:  The gun was already loaded and the shooter, having seen too much TV (or perhaps having read too much George Pelecanos), prepared to fire the gun by racking the slide and pumped a live shell out of the chamber and onto the ground. While he watched the shell skitter across the concrete, his intended victim ran away.

Whatever did happen, he is lucky the other guy didn’t have a gun, too.

Comments (41)

Top Rated
All Comments
from idahooutdoors wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Improper use of guns in entertainment irritates me on a daily basis. The History Channel has started using computers to put in muzzle flashes etc....watched a show the other night and the actors were recreating a world war 2 battle, muzzles were flashing and actors were shaking the tommy's like they were firing, but bolts were not moving and ejected cases were not flying, come on now, put away the computer and load up some blanks...

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from s-kfry wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

I get sick and tired of the entertainment industry getting this kind of stuff wrong. Last time I threw a grenade (yes, at Ft. McClelland, AL) there was a lot of noise and some dust, but no massive spouts of flame or a blinding flash of light. But, I guess reality is never good enough for Hollywood.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Pump guns (and lever guns) should be carried with a live round in the chamber in a situation where immediate fire is necessary. Hand grenades are not pocket A-bombs. And what about all those Henry rifles that fire round after round while the load spring activator is down at the action? Not to mention those Colt single actions that shoot 49 times? Hollywood can't get anything right,
least of all firearms. I could go on and on.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob81 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

I have to think that Hollywood does know better, they just don't care. The sound of a pump shotgun being racked is pretty bada$$, and looks and sounds cool right before a gunfight...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

It's always been about image and illusion in Hollywood.

That doesn't bother me as much as the fact we have idiots on the streets whose gun training comes from the illusion created in movies and television.

That's the scary part....

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from beanap wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

although if he hada shell in already he wouldnt have been able to rack it back again until he fired or used the button that disengages the firearm.. at least thats the way my 870 works

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Actually, I had training with a shotgun, and we did not chamber until firing position. Especially with arms at sling, if you have to move considerably, you can jar the trigger enough and/or trip the safety, depending on the model.

Now, as a disclaimer, that may have been for training, but we were not informed otherwise later.

And, of course, to any Marine, the phrase "lock and load" is funny. The proper saying is; "load and lock". This is from the M16 action stages...
-feeding,loading,chambering,locking,
firing,extracting,ejecting,cocking-.

And you're right. Guns are seldom used right in Hollywood. But I try to just enjoy the movie without grinding my teeth too much.

Silencers on revolvers?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB915 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Of course hollywood gets it wrong, cant expect anything else from them.

The one movie that bugs me the most with that is Dirty Harry. In the infamous, You feel lucky Punk sequence. They do not show him firing 6 shots. So when he threatened the thug, instead of the gun going click, it should have blown his head off. Sure someone in editing did not think about that at the time and cut a split second out. But what can we do, forget about it and enjoy the movie.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

It's not just shotguns. In just about any movie, you hear lots of guns cocking before the lead starts flying. I wish criminals were that dumb.

When home defense gets mentioned on this website, I always hear people mention racking their shotgun to scare the intruder away. Really? I think silence and then boom is a lot scarier. Hopefully, neither happens.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Three things come to mind
1. My father always says that one must know their weapon on choice.
2. Thank god for TV falsehoods is scenario 2 is the case.
3. both people involved were very luck. this could have ended it tragedy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cfroud wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Not all of Hollywood is getting it wrong these days. I'm proud that NCIS, CSI, and the like are getting the catridge count correct in the 1911 .45's. It used to drive me crazy to hear 15 rounds come from a single .45, nowadays, I mostly hear 8 and then a clip dropping.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Option 1: malfunction, option 2: idiot. My money's on 2: the moron probably discharged a live shell & the paper got the headline wrong. In the movie & TV world, I try not to let the poor attention to detail bother me. But I confess to annoying friends & family a few times by hitting pause and pointing it out.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

One of the best ones in movies are the SWAT guys deploying to a position while racking the charging handle of the M-16 "on the move". Too funny! You think these directors could throw a few dollars at a qualified arms officer for advise to make it look at least someone real even if is only a hollywood movie!?
Dumb and silly making cops look like bumbling idiots!PEOPLE BELIEVE WHAT THEY SEE IN MOVIES!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jersey pig wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

i have been involved in investigating 2 shootings where the bad guy racked a live round out of the pistol and then proceeded to fire while running away from his intended target. so what you got was a line of shell casings down the street starting with a live round and then empties. gotta love the ignorance.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Zermoid wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

There may be exceptions but every pump shotgun I've used locks the slide forward when a round is chambered (or the slide is racked ejecting the last round and closed) and the only way to open it is to pull the trigger, thus firing the round if present in chamber, or to use the slide unlock button to open the action without firing.

As to the pistols, any fool who carries a pistol he has to rack before defending his life is usually a dead man. I carry cocked and locked (1911A1) or when I carry my 380 or 25ACP it's hammer down on a loaded chamber, as I don't fully trust their single safety.

Also my 1911 has 9 rounds, 8 in the Wilson Combat mag and 1 in the chamber. So there could be 9 then a clip drops in a standard single stack 1911.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

crm30-06;

I'm with you; when I carry my Winchester 94 or Marlin 336 with the expectation of using it, the firing pin always has a primer under it. But I am not a law officer and I am usually alone. Cities are more afraid of lawyers than they are of criminals, and they should be; it is easy to convince a jury of non-shooters that a round in the chamber is an accident waiting to happen. As cops armed with long guns usually move in squads, and as you can work a lever or rack a slide at the same time you are mounting the gun, it is prudent to have them keep chambers empty until showtime. If one officer short strokes or jams his gun, the other five at his side probably didn't.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hypothetical TV scenario: there's this movie or TV hero who's about to join a gunfight. He utters some dramatic line ("someone's gotta pay and I'm collectin'"), racks the pumpgun as he takes it out of the old trunk. Then he arrives at the scene, he racks the gun as he leaves the car. Then the scene cuts to where he gets behind some cover, surveys the enemy positions, picks his spot, then racks the gun again as he moves to that spot. No shots fired so far, but no round ejected either.

He moves around and surprises one of the bad guys from behind. Somehow the bad guy refuses to cooperate and gives him that evil grin, so to convince the bad guy, our hero racks the gun again and shoves the muzzle at the bad guy's face (the bad guy stares wide-eyed at the huge bore for dramatic effect). Still no shots fired, no rounds ejecting.

Maybe our TV guy forgot to load his gun in the first place. Four cycles and nothing's come out.

Then of course the gunfight proceeds and he mows down a dozen guys without reloading.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Sometimes you hear the rack even when a double barrel is involved. The Simpsons almost always has pump doubles.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

I've seen the Simpson's pump doubles. Gotta agree, who takes a shotgun to a gunfight w/o a round in the chamber. The old "shuck-shuck" is theatrical gold to directors I guess.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from semp wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

corn drool!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from nc30-06 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hollywood is all for effect and sensationalism. Look at the crap they are putting out with people flying like they have little rockets up their asses. The saw the Bruce Lee movies and figured they could go one better.
Racking a shotgun is a fearful sound that Hollywood uses just like all the ricochets in the "spagetti westerns" that Eastwood was in. Bullets ricocheted off of everything they hit, even people. Some goof-ball thought that was the coolest sound and could not get enough of it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sharkfin wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Yep, the Hollywod gun is a scary thing. Ever notice how much noise they make just being moved from hand to hand or pulled out of a holster. If my gun made all that racket I'd never shoot it. I've also seen movies where someone's shooting a bolt action rifle but never works the bolt.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

you know what the old saying is don't you? "YOU HAVE TO BE SMARTER THAN THE EQUIPMENT YOU OPPERATE IS" . some people, just aren't that smart!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Since we're on the subject, and several people are mentioning it, maybe the "professional" .45 guys can answer it.

My first pistol qual was with the .45, and one of the things we were told stuck with me to this day. He considered the extra round a "showoff" thing and potentially a problem.

Here the way it was put... When you chamber a round, the round underneath is pushed forward. This makes it higher for the next chambering. When people drop the mag to put that extra round in, the "second" round is now lower and further back.

I was reminded of that years later, when I was reading some fiction novel where a character explained it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Perhaps Rudy wasn't out for his 3-pounds of flesh,maybe he just wanted to see what kind of reaction the action of his shotgun would bring.

The desired results transpired and Rudy didn't have to do jail time ... but was laughing all the way home.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clem Snide wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Elmore Leonard great? Nope. Raymond Chandler was great. James Lee Burke is great. Dashiell Hammet was great. Leonard ain't.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

My Favorite: The actor is holding a Glock and decides against shooting. As the gun is raised, the sound of a single action revolver's hammer being eased down is over dubbed. Even in the best movies, Hollywood is idiotic...

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from tom warner wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

It's quite surprising that here in the U.S., which probably has the largest firearms savvy population in the world, that both Hollywood and most authors remain so ignorant. One of my pet peeves is the scene where someone is shot and is shown being violently blown back through a window, against a wall, flying through the air, etc. Have you ever seen this happen to a large game animal? I haven't. Even small game shows no physical reaction to a bullet, although a close shotgun blast may result in the creature being pushed away somewhat. Neither does this happen with soldiers being shot in combat. A projectile enters and exits a body so quickly, that there is no time for it's momentum to have this effect. The person (or animal) either drops on the spot, or runs off wounded. You would think that writers and movie makers would have caught on to this by now, but I suspect that they are uninterested, since the phony scenario is so much more dramatic. Makes you wonder how much other BS is fed to us on subjects that we may know little about. Frankly, many shooters also seem unaware of this particular unreality. Tom

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

TOM, your post was the best of the lot, Not that they were not ALL GOOD! They were. I have shot many game animals, and agree fully, I have never seen one move back from the blast, if it was not killed outright it would run until it bled out!

Men either, having been in a few hot lanzing zones in my day and seeing the results of both big and small, people being hit with large and small rounds none but the guy I sam hit with an M-79 were moved other than falling.

Good comments from everyone ! Especially about idiot Hollyweird methods and Detective novels!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Sorry make that LANDING zones.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

The BS that goes on in movies never stops amazing. One good movie that is pretty accurate is "The Unforgiven". Clint reloads his double after every 2 shots. There is talk about how many rounds are left in the Spencer rifle. There's even a missfire from Clint's wet shotgun.
How about the criminals that hold semi-auto pistols sideways. Most of the crap is for visual effect. Last night I watched Lonsome Dove again. There are some scenes with horrible acts of gun safety. For example Jake Spoon shooting at a turtle on a rock while Lorena bathes in the river right behind. BTW Anyone ever seen a turtle sit on a log or rock right next to a human?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hey Del,
You know why those punks hold the pistols sideways?
Cause that's how they come out of the box.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from firedog11 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

What is worse and very few comment on this is the constant misinformation put out by the mainstream press both print and electronic. How many times have you seen a reporter call a semi auto or bolt action an assault rifle? Or how about the news special concerning college students and concealed carry where the "bad" guy was a trained expert and the "student" was in the front row, in the same seat for each scenario and the "bad" was told who and where the armed student was sitting each scenario. Kinda of reminds one of the rigged rollovers of the PUs about 20 years ago. One other thing Obamas pal who hopes to be on the SC says that the bill of rights doesn't apply to state and local goverments! You guys and gals better get on your phones and emails to your Senators if you want to have any rights left at all in 4 years.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hey how about Gran Torino? Good stuff or what?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Bob81: I think you have it about right; However, I have a friend wo is a Cop and he states that to enter a Bar, home, etc, when you slide that forebarm badk to enter a shell int the chamber that all come to attention. Me, I never owned but l Pump shotgun and then only till I could trade for a New Rem Auto. The Pump is not for me, but many swear by them as we all have our preference in guns. I use a 700 mostly but for 50 yrs used a Auto and yet have it ands do shoot it a lot. I got into the Bolt business due to a dumb Assed guide who would not allow me to have a round in the chamber and I lost the largest Elk I ever saw. Herer in the south, the Auto is still king along with the 30-30. Shoot-um-straight and often.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Jeff4066-
I'm not really a professional 1911 guy, but have used and carried one for 40 years. I don't get the part about the extra round being a showoff thing or a problem. I carry nine rounds at all times, or eight rounds with the old style mags. Only potential problem I can foresee is that some springs will weaken and fail to lock the slide back when the last round is fired.
One less round is one less chance to stop an attack or end a situation.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 29 weeks 21 hours ago

I believe that answer number 2 would be correct. Maybe he was intending to scare him off with just the sound of the pump... which he did. But if I was the victim, I would be saving up some money and investing in a gun and a concealed weapons permit.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 28 weeks 2 days ago

Just got my CCW permit after a 9 week wait.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 28 weeks 1 day ago

scenario 2 is most likely

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 28 weeks 1 day ago

I am thinking scenario 2 myself I did the same thing once,
when a guy was looking to steal some stuff from my car, my loud mouthed dog let me know somone was outside. I went out the back way, just before turning the corner of the house I shucked a shell in the chamber. When I turned it the guy was
half way down the block! Neither of us got hurt and problem solved. No one ever tried again, I guess he spread the "WORD".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 28 weeks 1 day ago

Scenario 3:

"While fumble-fingering a weapon with which he was not trained nor experienced; the perp heard a deafening boom and bright flash and almost simultaneously experienced a sharp burning pain rapidly followed by a second boom and similar pain while he was collapsing into a heap due to loss of blood pressure to the brain."

That's the scenario the perp would have likely experienced with confrontaition with my .357 Smith. A good old fashioned double tap center mass.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from idahooutdoors wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Improper use of guns in entertainment irritates me on a daily basis. The History Channel has started using computers to put in muzzle flashes etc....watched a show the other night and the actors were recreating a world war 2 battle, muzzles were flashing and actors were shaking the tommy's like they were firing, but bolts were not moving and ejected cases were not flying, come on now, put away the computer and load up some blanks...

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from beanap wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

although if he hada shell in already he wouldnt have been able to rack it back again until he fired or used the button that disengages the firearm.. at least thats the way my 870 works

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Zermoid wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

There may be exceptions but every pump shotgun I've used locks the slide forward when a round is chambered (or the slide is racked ejecting the last round and closed) and the only way to open it is to pull the trigger, thus firing the round if present in chamber, or to use the slide unlock button to open the action without firing.

As to the pistols, any fool who carries a pistol he has to rack before defending his life is usually a dead man. I carry cocked and locked (1911A1) or when I carry my 380 or 25ACP it's hammer down on a loaded chamber, as I don't fully trust their single safety.

Also my 1911 has 9 rounds, 8 in the Wilson Combat mag and 1 in the chamber. So there could be 9 then a clip drops in a standard single stack 1911.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from O Garcia wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hypothetical TV scenario: there's this movie or TV hero who's about to join a gunfight. He utters some dramatic line ("someone's gotta pay and I'm collectin'"), racks the pumpgun as he takes it out of the old trunk. Then he arrives at the scene, he racks the gun as he leaves the car. Then the scene cuts to where he gets behind some cover, surveys the enemy positions, picks his spot, then racks the gun again as he moves to that spot. No shots fired so far, but no round ejected either.

He moves around and surprises one of the bad guys from behind. Somehow the bad guy refuses to cooperate and gives him that evil grin, so to convince the bad guy, our hero racks the gun again and shoves the muzzle at the bad guy's face (the bad guy stares wide-eyed at the huge bore for dramatic effect). Still no shots fired, no rounds ejecting.

Maybe our TV guy forgot to load his gun in the first place. Four cycles and nothing's come out.

Then of course the gunfight proceeds and he mows down a dozen guys without reloading.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hey Del,
You know why those punks hold the pistols sideways?
Cause that's how they come out of the box.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from firedog11 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

What is worse and very few comment on this is the constant misinformation put out by the mainstream press both print and electronic. How many times have you seen a reporter call a semi auto or bolt action an assault rifle? Or how about the news special concerning college students and concealed carry where the "bad" guy was a trained expert and the "student" was in the front row, in the same seat for each scenario and the "bad" was told who and where the armed student was sitting each scenario. Kinda of reminds one of the rigged rollovers of the PUs about 20 years ago. One other thing Obamas pal who hopes to be on the SC says that the bill of rights doesn't apply to state and local goverments! You guys and gals better get on your phones and emails to your Senators if you want to have any rights left at all in 4 years.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Jeff4066-
I'm not really a professional 1911 guy, but have used and carried one for 40 years. I don't get the part about the extra round being a showoff thing or a problem. I carry nine rounds at all times, or eight rounds with the old style mags. Only potential problem I can foresee is that some springs will weaken and fail to lock the slide back when the last round is fired.
One less round is one less chance to stop an attack or end a situation.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from s-kfry wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

I get sick and tired of the entertainment industry getting this kind of stuff wrong. Last time I threw a grenade (yes, at Ft. McClelland, AL) there was a lot of noise and some dust, but no massive spouts of flame or a blinding flash of light. But, I guess reality is never good enough for Hollywood.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Pump guns (and lever guns) should be carried with a live round in the chamber in a situation where immediate fire is necessary. Hand grenades are not pocket A-bombs. And what about all those Henry rifles that fire round after round while the load spring activator is down at the action? Not to mention those Colt single actions that shoot 49 times? Hollywood can't get anything right,
least of all firearms. I could go on and on.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Actually, I had training with a shotgun, and we did not chamber until firing position. Especially with arms at sling, if you have to move considerably, you can jar the trigger enough and/or trip the safety, depending on the model.

Now, as a disclaimer, that may have been for training, but we were not informed otherwise later.

And, of course, to any Marine, the phrase "lock and load" is funny. The proper saying is; "load and lock". This is from the M16 action stages...
-feeding,loading,chambering,locking,
firing,extracting,ejecting,cocking-.

And you're right. Guns are seldom used right in Hollywood. But I try to just enjoy the movie without grinding my teeth too much.

Silencers on revolvers?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

It's not just shotguns. In just about any movie, you hear lots of guns cocking before the lead starts flying. I wish criminals were that dumb.

When home defense gets mentioned on this website, I always hear people mention racking their shotgun to scare the intruder away. Really? I think silence and then boom is a lot scarier. Hopefully, neither happens.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

One of the best ones in movies are the SWAT guys deploying to a position while racking the charging handle of the M-16 "on the move". Too funny! You think these directors could throw a few dollars at a qualified arms officer for advise to make it look at least someone real even if is only a hollywood movie!?
Dumb and silly making cops look like bumbling idiots!PEOPLE BELIEVE WHAT THEY SEE IN MOVIES!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

I've seen the Simpson's pump doubles. Gotta agree, who takes a shotgun to a gunfight w/o a round in the chamber. The old "shuck-shuck" is theatrical gold to directors I guess.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from nc30-06 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hollywood is all for effect and sensationalism. Look at the crap they are putting out with people flying like they have little rockets up their asses. The saw the Bruce Lee movies and figured they could go one better.
Racking a shotgun is a fearful sound that Hollywood uses just like all the ricochets in the "spagetti westerns" that Eastwood was in. Bullets ricocheted off of everything they hit, even people. Some goof-ball thought that was the coolest sound and could not get enough of it.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sharkfin wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Yep, the Hollywod gun is a scary thing. Ever notice how much noise they make just being moved from hand to hand or pulled out of a holster. If my gun made all that racket I'd never shoot it. I've also seen movies where someone's shooting a bolt action rifle but never works the bolt.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

My Favorite: The actor is holding a Glock and decides against shooting. As the gun is raised, the sound of a single action revolver's hammer being eased down is over dubbed. Even in the best movies, Hollywood is idiotic...

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from tom warner wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

It's quite surprising that here in the U.S., which probably has the largest firearms savvy population in the world, that both Hollywood and most authors remain so ignorant. One of my pet peeves is the scene where someone is shot and is shown being violently blown back through a window, against a wall, flying through the air, etc. Have you ever seen this happen to a large game animal? I haven't. Even small game shows no physical reaction to a bullet, although a close shotgun blast may result in the creature being pushed away somewhat. Neither does this happen with soldiers being shot in combat. A projectile enters and exits a body so quickly, that there is no time for it's momentum to have this effect. The person (or animal) either drops on the spot, or runs off wounded. You would think that writers and movie makers would have caught on to this by now, but I suspect that they are uninterested, since the phony scenario is so much more dramatic. Makes you wonder how much other BS is fed to us on subjects that we may know little about. Frankly, many shooters also seem unaware of this particular unreality. Tom

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

TOM, your post was the best of the lot, Not that they were not ALL GOOD! They were. I have shot many game animals, and agree fully, I have never seen one move back from the blast, if it was not killed outright it would run until it bled out!

Men either, having been in a few hot lanzing zones in my day and seeing the results of both big and small, people being hit with large and small rounds none but the guy I sam hit with an M-79 were moved other than falling.

Good comments from everyone ! Especially about idiot Hollyweird methods and Detective novels!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

The BS that goes on in movies never stops amazing. One good movie that is pretty accurate is "The Unforgiven". Clint reloads his double after every 2 shots. There is talk about how many rounds are left in the Spencer rifle. There's even a missfire from Clint's wet shotgun.
How about the criminals that hold semi-auto pistols sideways. Most of the crap is for visual effect. Last night I watched Lonsome Dove again. There are some scenes with horrible acts of gun safety. For example Jake Spoon shooting at a turtle on a rock while Lorena bathes in the river right behind. BTW Anyone ever seen a turtle sit on a log or rock right next to a human?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bob81 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

I have to think that Hollywood does know better, they just don't care. The sound of a pump shotgun being racked is pretty bada$$, and looks and sounds cool right before a gunfight...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

It's always been about image and illusion in Hollywood.

That doesn't bother me as much as the fact we have idiots on the streets whose gun training comes from the illusion created in movies and television.

That's the scary part....

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from MB915 wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Of course hollywood gets it wrong, cant expect anything else from them.

The one movie that bugs me the most with that is Dirty Harry. In the infamous, You feel lucky Punk sequence. They do not show him firing 6 shots. So when he threatened the thug, instead of the gun going click, it should have blown his head off. Sure someone in editing did not think about that at the time and cut a split second out. But what can we do, forget about it and enjoy the movie.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from ggmack wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Three things come to mind
1. My father always says that one must know their weapon on choice.
2. Thank god for TV falsehoods is scenario 2 is the case.
3. both people involved were very luck. this could have ended it tragedy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cfroud wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Not all of Hollywood is getting it wrong these days. I'm proud that NCIS, CSI, and the like are getting the catridge count correct in the 1911 .45's. It used to drive me crazy to hear 15 rounds come from a single .45, nowadays, I mostly hear 8 and then a clip dropping.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from seadog wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Option 1: malfunction, option 2: idiot. My money's on 2: the moron probably discharged a live shell & the paper got the headline wrong. In the movie & TV world, I try not to let the poor attention to detail bother me. But I confess to annoying friends & family a few times by hitting pause and pointing it out.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jersey pig wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

i have been involved in investigating 2 shootings where the bad guy racked a live round out of the pistol and then proceeded to fire while running away from his intended target. so what you got was a line of shell casings down the street starting with a live round and then empties. gotta love the ignorance.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

crm30-06;

I'm with you; when I carry my Winchester 94 or Marlin 336 with the expectation of using it, the firing pin always has a primer under it. But I am not a law officer and I am usually alone. Cities are more afraid of lawyers than they are of criminals, and they should be; it is easy to convince a jury of non-shooters that a round in the chamber is an accident waiting to happen. As cops armed with long guns usually move in squads, and as you can work a lever or rack a slide at the same time you are mounting the gun, it is prudent to have them keep chambers empty until showtime. If one officer short strokes or jams his gun, the other five at his side probably didn't.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Sometimes you hear the rack even when a double barrel is involved. The Simpsons almost always has pump doubles.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from semp wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

corn drool!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from elmer f. wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

you know what the old saying is don't you? "YOU HAVE TO BE SMARTER THAN THE EQUIPMENT YOU OPPERATE IS" . some people, just aren't that smart!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeff4066 wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Since we're on the subject, and several people are mentioning it, maybe the "professional" .45 guys can answer it.

My first pistol qual was with the .45, and one of the things we were told stuck with me to this day. He considered the extra round a "showoff" thing and potentially a problem.

Here the way it was put... When you chamber a round, the round underneath is pushed forward. This makes it higher for the next chambering. When people drop the mag to put that extra round in, the "second" round is now lower and further back.

I was reminded of that years later, when I was reading some fiction novel where a character explained it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Perhaps Rudy wasn't out for his 3-pounds of flesh,maybe he just wanted to see what kind of reaction the action of his shotgun would bring.

The desired results transpired and Rudy didn't have to do jail time ... but was laughing all the way home.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clem Snide wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Elmore Leonard great? Nope. Raymond Chandler was great. James Lee Burke is great. Dashiell Hammet was great. Leonard ain't.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Bob81: I think you have it about right; However, I have a friend wo is a Cop and he states that to enter a Bar, home, etc, when you slide that forebarm badk to enter a shell int the chamber that all come to attention. Me, I never owned but l Pump shotgun and then only till I could trade for a New Rem Auto. The Pump is not for me, but many swear by them as we all have our preference in guns. I use a 700 mostly but for 50 yrs used a Auto and yet have it ands do shoot it a lot. I got into the Bolt business due to a dumb Assed guide who would not allow me to have a round in the chamber and I lost the largest Elk I ever saw. Herer in the south, the Auto is still king along with the 30-30. Shoot-um-straight and often.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 29 weeks 21 hours ago

I believe that answer number 2 would be correct. Maybe he was intending to scare him off with just the sound of the pump... which he did. But if I was the victim, I would be saving up some money and investing in a gun and a concealed weapons permit.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 28 weeks 1 day ago

scenario 2 is most likely

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 28 weeks 1 day ago

Scenario 3:

"While fumble-fingering a weapon with which he was not trained nor experienced; the perp heard a deafening boom and bright flash and almost simultaneously experienced a sharp burning pain rapidly followed by a second boom and similar pain while he was collapsing into a heap due to loss of blood pressure to the brain."

That's the scenario the perp would have likely experienced with confrontaition with my .357 Smith. A good old fashioned double tap center mass.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Sorry make that LANDING zones.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Hey how about Gran Torino? Good stuff or what?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 28 weeks 2 days ago

Just got my CCW permit after a 9 week wait.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Moishe wrote 28 weeks 1 day ago

I am thinking scenario 2 myself I did the same thing once,
when a guy was looking to steal some stuff from my car, my loud mouthed dog let me know somone was outside. I went out the back way, just before turning the corner of the house I shucked a shell in the chamber. When I turned it the guy was
half way down the block! Neither of us got hurt and problem solved. No one ever tried again, I guess he spread the "WORD".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment