


October 13, 2009
Petzal: Choose Your Weapons for the "Coming Collapse"

Courtesy of Joe Cermele, I got to read “Patriots, a novel of Survival in the Coming Collapse,” by James Wesley, Rawles (no, I don’t have a clue why he uses a comma). It is not so much a novel as a series of survival scenarios and lots of information pertaining to same, strung together loosely by a sort of story line. Mr. Comma Rawles is a survivalist, runs a blog (SurvivalBlog.com) which is full of fascinating intel, and, despite his limitations as a writer, has put together a long and very interesting book.
The USA, it seems, has suffered a cataclysmic economic collapse (his description of this will not help you sleep better at night.) and, as Tommy Lee Jones said, “Anarchies will reign!” A group of survivalists who have seen this coming forts up to survive the breakdown of society, and each is required to buy four firearms. They can get whatever else they like, but they have to have these four:
A Ruger 10/22
A Model 1911 (any make) in .45 ACP
A Remington 870 modified for combat
An AR-15 in .223 for the women, or an H&K Model 91 in .308 for the men
So, as Der Tag nears my question to you all is, what would you take to the hills with? It does not have to be four guns, it can be one or two or eight or a crossbow. Let the nominations commence.
(By the way, the book is on sale at Amazon.com for around $10.)
Comments (188)
Moishe, then that leaves the mobs. Odds are getting better.
Flame Thrower so the game I shot would be ready to eat.
Bella, the cannon would be great for one shot unless you have a clear avenue and time for a reload.
Flame Thrower so the game I shot would be ready to eat.
I think that over time people begin to live in a fantasy more than reality when it comes to speculating about big events like the ones proposed here. People easily look past the reality of life. The reality here, if you live in America right now you are more dependent upon the group than you could ever imagine. If our entire electricity supply was shut down right now, I don't think that even 10 percent (yeah, that includes all the hard core survivalists out there) would really make it through the first winter. All of the talk about defending houses and shooting neighbors like they were a video game "bad guy" is nonesense. Your neighbors, like it or not, are as smart as you and as skilled as you, and would likely have an equal chance of picking you off in the night with a subsonic 22 or a .50BMG from a mile away, while you sat trying to take a dump in a bucket in your garage because your septic system failed. People forget that they aren't Rambo. Rambo was not even Rambo. Realizing limitations is neccessary for successful survival. Also a humbling thought is that if someone wanted any one of us dead at this point and time, there is nothing stopping anyone from walking up to any one of us and pulling a trigger. Not many of us are ready to enter full combat situations on our way out the door to work or while we are out mowing the lawn. Those are just reactions I have when I hear people debating how they are going to take a muzzleloader up into the mountains with them because then they can reformate black powder by finding charcoal, and sulfur and then form some sort of ignition system. I know it is possible to cut your own arrows because it has been done before, but I dare anyone to walk out into the woods, cut their own arrows from wood, and then shoot a deer with it, all while slowly freezing and starving to death. Knives rust, guns rust, equipment fails, and ammo runs out. We are a thousand times more likely to die from smoking or diabetes.
My Beretta Cx4 Storm, my Beretta 92F, and my Kel-Tec Sub2000. They all fire the same round from the same magazines. A bolt-action Mossberg 695 12GA with rifled barrel thrown in there as well. With luck and Hornady's SST 300 gr sabots it'll take any game/zombie around and shoots sub 2MOA at 100 yards all day long and can shoot buckshot or bird shot at need.
If you're really interested in getting into survival mode, come check out our Survival section at www.hipoinfirearmsforums.com lots of friendly people, no gun snobs.
nc30/06, yup and I think the oath keeper would help against the mobs.
Just having a little fun, Moishe. C'mon, are you going to tell me you haven't fantacized about your own "Red Dawn" moment?
"If we are talking about complete breakdown not just of the government and economy but civilization itself, then the ability to fire one slow shot from a flintlock (unless you know how to get hold of fulminate of mercury for a percussion cap), when nobody else shoot at all, would have value."
Excatly the reason to have a muzzle-loader. As I noted before, the whole question is really several questions all rolled into one. If you're defending a community you make one choice, if you're running another, and if you think long term societal collapse is the order of business, you make a plan with some time-depth. The muzzle-loader backup is a hedge against long-period collapse.
"But most doomsday scenarios involve short-term survival, a couple of years at the most, before some kind of government again raises its head."
Sure. The thing is this is all speculation. You plan for what may happen not what you're confident would happen.
"Even if the bad times last for a couple of years, five hundred rounds of centerfire rifle ammo, the same for pistol, five thousand rounds of .22 Long Rifle, and a hundred shotgun shells should allow you to hold out.."
Sure, as long as you are more or less in a rural area and not having to fight an insurgency trying to deprive you of what you have.
"I disagree on the disoriented ,powerless, Civilian logistic support dependant military."
Harumpf. Disagree all you want. Armies have made that mistake dozens of times and they're 0 for dozens.
"Mike your wrong"
No, I'm not.
"and even if we ran out of resources any brother in the military or that has served in combat would previal agianst a civilian mob or mobs in most cases.."
For one or two engagements, yes. But then, any well-organized community defending itself would also prevail against such mobs. And that is, after all, what we're talking about. Anyone who thinks that good discipline and order will prevail in the US armed forces during a period of prolongued anarchy and starvation is optimisitic to the point of delusion.
@ChevJames
"The only way we'd survive is to maintain some kind of "community.""
Exactly so. But also, consider, that even as an individual, you don't need to outrun the T-rex, you just need to outrun the guy next to you. You don't need to outgun the mob, you just need to be alot more inconvenient than the next potential victim. Even in mobs, most people take being shot at with a high degree of cold caution. It did not take many armed Korean expats standing on their businesses in South Central L.A. to encourage the rioters to turn on themselves rather than on Korean businesses.
" I dont think we got our asses handed to us."
Who won? Why? In the end the US armed forces lost the support of the US civilian population. End of war, US Armed forces lost. You can only keep all those force multipliers in action for so long until they run out of fuel or otherwise break down. After that, it comes down to guys with rifles. If the remnants of the US Army were fighting to occupy some armed community in ugly terrain, my money's on the armed community. The basic facts of concealment, cover, surprise, and terrain still rule the battlefield once you're down to mostly guys with rifles.
Let's all admit, this is an interesting fantasy and a fun exercise to speculate, but in the end unless you live in one seriously remote location it'd take a lot of luck on top of any prep you do. Still it makes sense to take preparations. My personal attitude has been to always have a few months food, plus the ability to hold on to it against less than casual intrusion while having water and heat if the grid goes down. Any more than that and I just live too close to a major metropolis. A brief food riot and violence and you can hold your own. 8 million hungry people beginning to scour the countryside will also organize and the worst of people already are, so good luck with that. 10 million survivalists against 300 million scavengers is going to be tough, particularly when the decisions you make will blur the lines of right and wrong at every point. Even 1 man on a wall being worth 10 beneath might not be enough. That's without having second thoughts about denying others respite. Civil unrest and shortages I think you can reasonably prepare for and if everyone behaved responsibly before time wouldn't be much of an issue, but they won't, so it will. Civil collapse would be a razor that would pare down to a lucky few. A full collapse I think is less likely than you think even in these times. In the end the resources all exist and even if the currency dies the black market and cottage industries will pick up or the country would have the common sense to realize what a huge proportion of natural resources we have at home no matter our currency troubles and withdraw from the world stage. The number one rule of real estate will come into play. I'm sure we could re-organize to provide sufficient energy to agriculture to keep things moving. The govt health plan would probably go on hold..
You might be better off working on your language skills. If things got that bad in our great land, SOME world power will happily step in and supervise.
The book sounds like World War Z or The Zhombie Survival Guide by Max Brooks but with a real experience bend. They're both highly interesting and entertaining reading if anyone's curious. The lessons are the same.
Survival in this old world isn't possible, anyway. The best we can do is to get on the same page, team up and vote similarly when possible, and not give up on the best social contract devised, so far. I have had a mob on my doorstep, when my family was quaking in the bedrooms, and I was on the other side of the front door with a shotgun. There was not enough ammo or help, to make much of a difference. I am here because the mob decided to run down a few blocks farther, not because I am so very well prepared, or have a battery of fine weapons. Which I did, and do. Since then, I have given this survival thing a bit of thought, and have concluded:
---I will try to be a good neighbor...and take care of my family and other helpless neighbors..
---I won't be in the frame of mind to shoot down my local sheriff or deputies, nor my local National Guard boys...that is just the truth of it. They are not my enemy, nor I, theirs.
---I will hold the politicians to their campaign promises, as best I can, and encourage Truth along the way. That beats out 165 gr. boat-tails, most of the time.
---I will teach as many kids and women as I can how to shoot, and how to love their land and freedom. And I do that now, not waiting until a disaster.
---I will not be buying survivalist books, nor hate-filled books about Bush or Obama...some poor boob has to be the President, and I will pray for his or her soul. However, I will not trust any of them.
What will I do, should catastrophe reign for a while, such as in a dirty nuclear bomb in the city of Baltimore or Washington, D.C.?
Same as above, and try to raise some chickens, cut more wood for the stove, keep my garden going, and teach the ignorant know-it-all kids how to do the same. Looters might be shot, particularly at night, in and around the house. I have already let one village idiot off, when I could have taken his life. I am so GLAD that I did not shoot him down, just because I had the drop on him.
Personally, I think that shooters and hunters are the cream of the crop, generally...and that the rest of the country should be looking to us for stability, not for an isolationist, angry point of view. I also honestly think that we will band up together in local groups, most likely, to pool our strength, not leave our homes for the cabin or cave. That is when we speak quietly and carry a big stick...with hollow points.
There is no substitute for being prepared, but our people also need a temperate tongue, and wisdom, behind the pistols. We need to be trusted, smart, and reliable. And, truth be known, many of us are probably past the military age of our former years. We would, as needed, sell our lives dearly. That is a given. If you have ever tried to clean up the blood from a floor, or dig graves, you will find time for a little reflection. That kind of preparation is needed, too. Ask some wise old coot who has done it--he'll tell you the same, I believe.
Guys..you do realize that we are inventoring our batteries for all to see...?
Peace, backed with Sam Colt.
Blue
Rice Farm, not really, What I would like to see was suggested by Tom Clancy in "Debt of Honor" and "Executive Orders" And "Without Remorse" but unfortunately Jack Ryan is fictional.
Vince Flynn is also full of good ideas, as Was John Ross when he Wrote "Unintended Consequences", but none of any of this is likely to happen.
dang people you're getting deep-it's a rather simple question(although I enjoyed reading the responses) the question being what would you take to the hills with you? my answer to that; I'd take a knife, my bow/arrows my 3006 and as much ammo as I can carry. I should be fine for a while.
I love reading these responses…including mine at the top. The Social aspects of what the bloggers write baffles me in 300-years of history is ignored.
Just recall this country was set up to self-sustaining and self-govnoring colonies. That basic form…the town meeting….is hard wired into our being.
The USA suffered and survived the Civil War and the Great Depression without too much fuss.
In the scenarios mentioned, although I could probably stand guard at nights and do my security part….I best become part of a community that has a good pharmacy. I’m really too old to run too far and I take too many pills with my morning coffee. I’m also smart and experienced enough to know being a “Survivalist” means a good chance of not making it through a NY Winter without starving, freezing, or dying of disease. No gun[s] are going to change this basic.
With regard to firearms, would there be an advantage to having two firearms chambered for the same cartridge? A .22 LR rifle and revolver/semiauto, for instance? Or a lever action .44 mag and revolver?
I think if an apocalyptic event occurs we best have well-honed community building skills. We'll survive better working together.
We should all give up our guns and by our good example we will usher in peace on earth!!!
So get with the program or we'll have to send you to the Gulag!
Very interesting discussion, but I think I'd revert to the idea of survival, not confrontation to force. Regardless of "Red Dawn", I'm hiding out in the hinterlands (yes, I know where, they'll be a long time finding me), trying to survive and save those near and dear to me, not waging war.
The .22 seems to be the best,lightest, cheapest and overall best "survival" piece.
Better spend the weight I carry on shelter, warmth, and
health items.
blueridge
Excellent post. I hope to be in the area of others of like mind should the unthinkable occur.
Best strategy so far, live out in the "fly-over" country where I do.
Great hunting, fishing, nice life, etc. and no traffic jams.
There ain't nuf' money to get me to live anywhere any enemy would want to attack.
To those in the "big cities", good luck.
jl
More and more I'm amused with how the question "So, as Der Tag nears my question to you all is, what would you take to the hills with?" on a forum that generally gets well into double digits on responses has turned into a hundred and some responses ranging from answering the question to how big of a threat the U.S. military poses.
As another, other aside, I think the U.S. military is the most powerful thing stalking the planet, however I think the U.S. soldier is also one of the most moral.
Mr. Deihl
As far as the miliary goes I know what I'm talking about and I agree very strongly with Moishe comment about not attacking civilians and family members.
Also we took an oath and we will defend the nation and I'm pretty sure alot of vets and other civilians would band together with them and law enforcement to help delay and defend any outpost set up against any mob.
There are many things other than fuel.
I don't need tanks, gunships or CAS to take out targets.
There are many other toys out there to play with that are simple yet effective.
Food can be found almost anywhere.
"I'm pretty sure alot of vets and other civilians would band together with them and law enforcement to help delay and defend any outpost set up against any mob."
That's an encouraging thought.
"Food can be found almost anywhere."
Good luck with that.
"There are many other toys out there to play with that are simple yet effective."
In a forum full of firearm enthusiasts, you're pretty much stating the obvious there, general.
"As another, other aside, I think the U.S. military is the most powerful thing stalking the planet"
Yes. When it can bring force multiplying assets to bear it's pretty much unstoppable. Without that, it's not particularly more dangerous than any army from any age in history.
"however I think the U.S. soldier is also one of the most moral"
IMO the US armed forces are a cross section of society and is comprised of all kinds. I think, I hope, that it would never face the test of some sort of major societal collapse. That said, the scenario posited by Comma is pretty extreme. No government, so to whom will the US armed forces answer? No value to currency, so how will it obtain food unless by conscription? Once you start robbing people to maintain yourself institutionally, you make enemies. Would the US armed forces or some subset place its own institutional existence ahead of civil liberties or even insert itself as a kind of junta on the civil population's back? One hopes not.
But I don't see anyone feeding something the size of a regimental combat team on worms and bugs they've been trained to eat in E&E school and yet remain a field effective force, regardless of what a few Machismo hampered members of the forum may assert.
Unless, of course, that RGT is living off of long pig, hairless goat, man corn, and soylent green.
You pretty much have an answer for everything there mr Deihl... I'm no General Smart a$$.. never claimed to be... I just know the capabilities of one of the greatest militaries in the modern world and the will of free men and women.
Food can be found almost everywhere... you gotta remember in a chaotic situation abandoned homes, stores etc.. source of food. MRE's source of food... stockpiles food. Farms, Crops, Wildlife.
If you have a defensive position it will probably have a water source and food stores.
What I speak of has nothin to do with guns... it has to do with improvising... using your head thinking outside the box.. High Speed.
I don't know why some people want to paint the military as some kind of thugs that are just gonna turn on it's own people or just fall apart in a scenerio filled with chaos. That just breeds mistrust which obviuosly is seen in some statements.
Anyways enough of this bickering and knit picking... We got way off subject.. you have your opinion I have mine.
"I just know the capabilities of one of the greatest militaries in the modern world and the will of free men and women."
Remember, the Bushido Spirit will always prevail if applied with sufficient will and determination. Not.
"Food can be found almost everywhere... you gotta remember in a chaotic situation abandoned homes, stores etc.. source of food."
Uh huh. All those civilians are just going to abandon it to you?
"Farms, Crops,"
And if the civilian populace calculates it does not need you or feel like supporting you, then....?
"Wildlife."
Right. Like I said, if you're feeding anything remotely as large as a regimental combat team on "Wildlife" you no longer have a field capable force.
"What I speak of has nothin to do with guns... it has to do with improvising... using your head thinking outside the box.. High Speed."
I know what yer talking about, general, I just don't share your opinion that no one else has thought about it.
"I don't know why some people want to paint the military as some kind of thugs that are just gonna turn on it's own people or just fall apart in a scenerio filled with chaos."
You got it wrong there, general. No one's trying to "Paint the military" as anything at all. But I didn't write the "no government no currency" scenario. I'm just addressing it.
Call me a cynic if you like, but I think Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle got it about right even if their scenario was a bit more cataclysmic than "economic and governmental collapse."
It will never get that bad, because we won't let it, but I'd bring what's in the safe:
Savage Model 1Y single-shot(for use by me and the kids)
New England .410 bore single-shot (for the kids)
Savage .30-06
Berreta 390 12ga
Ruger SP101 .357 (with .38 ammo for wife)
M1911A1 made by Remington Rand in 1943 (for good luck, because it survived the last end of the world)
would depend on what I'm running from or to. Most of us have nevere had to survive in the wild, so better consider what it takes to make in the woods. Yes, guns are necessary, but many other items are as important. I would make a list that would fit in my pack to take along. A quality knife would also be a great item to have if you can shoot game. Guns; again depends on what you prefer to do, kill or live.
I agree, at least in part, of most of the posts. I know this started as a kinda fun "Mad Max" exercise, but it began to really make me think. I've served 10 yrs in the Marine Corps and over 25 yrs in law enforcement. I belong to the NRA, several gun clubs, veterans organizations, a church, the PTA, my kids sport organizations, and help with the Scouts. One thing I've learned on my brief stay on earth, is that we are strongest in our community-- wherever we call it--and far weaker alone. Ive had several friands over the years who were Scout-snipers, Navy SEALS, and who worked for various gov't alphabet departments. Most will honestly tell you, commando stuff by highly trained professional personnel works great when you have intel, surprise, and logistics, and turns into a complete cluster when intel is old/lousy, the surprise is OVER, and you're cut off and alone. Visit Arlington Cemetary. Read the citations for the Medal of Honor. I guess what I'm trying to say is that we will always be stronger in communty than out of one. I guess the most important items I'd pick are: paint, brushes, and plywood so I could make large signs that would read: WE SHOOT LOOTERS, and post them at the entrances to MY town. The rest of all that cr-p is in my basement. No smoking please.
Dave DID ask a simple question, so that is why I stuck with guns and didn't get into MREs, water purifiers, means of starting a fire, etc. when speaking of surviving the apocalypse.
Mr. Diehl, there is only so much room in the back of your station wagon. You and your muzzleloader are the ones doing the dreamy speculation here; if I have room in my car for lead, black powder, and a nine pound 48" long flintlock, I've got room for another SKS and a lot more ammo. I can tell you for sure that whatever happens in the long haul, we are guaranteed to be up to our bee-hinds in alligators in the short. Every time there has been a power outage in New York, Chicago, etc. every window within rock throwing distance of the ground was instantly broken and the stores instantly looted. Some coppers roughed up a lowlife on film fifteen years ago in L.A. and the town went nuts for days. A big storm hit LA four years ago and what the waves didn't carry away from New Orleans, the looters did.
The problem with running is that anywhere you run to that's worth living in has people living there already. Such people are likely to consider you and your carload of bows and black powder weapons to be a danger to them. Your best strategy is to run to that place NOW, so that when the ball drops they know you for a friend and ally.
One good consistent thing most bloggers here have done is pick out guns that (except for that 5.7 pistol, cool though it is) take common ammo. Everybody running needs at least one gun that is easily refueled. In this respect the .22 rimfire is king. A .45 is good, but a revolver like a Ruger convertible in .357/ .38/ 9mm would be a handy thing to have stashed somewhere, just because if you can't get ammo that gun can shoot, you can't get ammo period. Same goes for something that shoots .30-30 or .30-06, even if it is a Handi-rifle; every hardware store in the country sells .30-30 or .30-06; can't say that for .300 WSM or .50 cal. Browning.
you could do much with a 10/22 or any reliable .22 plus thousands of ammo. I should point out that when you're ALREADY in survival mode, FORGET your pride and your wingshooting, and just shoot the birds on the ground or in the water or while they're roosted in branches. A scoped 10/22 will give you better chances than a shotgun (less recoil, too). I know a lot will disagree with this comment, but remember, survival mode.
of course, this does not mean you should not have a shotgun. you should. but with a .22 you can have more ammo per volume of storage space. just a suggestion.
Another Ruger, the Mini-14, deserves equal mention as the AR-15. and since we're into AR-15s for defence (come on, even with all its shortcomings, the AR is a common item, you can buy, beg, borrow or steal mags and ammo anywhere), try a "piston gun" variant just in case you don't like cleaning (no I'm not connected with any of the makers or vendors).
a Marlin 30-30. or a Winchester 94 if you already have one. These are more accurate and reliable than they're given credit. You're good for 150-200 yards with most food animals. Plenty of ammo, even in Alaska, less bulky too. less recoil, kill animals just as dead.
But you should have a .308 or .30-06. or a .270 (again, commonly available ammo). Scoped. just in case you really need to touch something farther than the .30-30 would reach. Forget about brown bears, you're in survival mode, but not Ice Age survival mode. there are better things to shoot than brown bears. Think cows and elk and deer. the mild .30's (funny how we think of the '06 as mild today) will take care of them. have the AR-15 or Mini-14 or even the shotgun and 10/22 standing by just in case you need a lot of follow ups. Again, you're in survival mode. Forget your pride, shoot as many times until it's visibly down and dead. The animal that runs could end up in the hands of other survivalists (who are also trying to get food any way they can), and then you'd have to fight a shooting fight, which you don't need right now.
a flintlock muzzleloader? maybe. you could run out of percussion caps. save on wheelweights too, or any source of lead. and some bullet/ball molds.
any reliable stove, even a wood stove. you don't know how to refine crude oil, do you?
a machete. use it for everything except shaving. unless you have fleas, you can forego shaving for a while.
a recurve or longbow. learn how to use them. if this collapse lasts longer than 5 years, your recurve or longbow will still be in tune. hopefully. and you can make a longbow with hand tools. you can't with a compound, unless you have a factory in running order.
a tool chest. probably with addition of Swiss Army knives or Leathermans in your pocket. A wrench or a hammer or a small diameter Philips screwdriver makes for a decent last ditch weapon.
learn how to make and use spears. don't throw them, when you throw them, you lose them. and you have bullets and arrows for that purpose. use them like the Macedonians did. When an angry animal or an angry mob is closing in, it just might save you. or if you have a Garand or M-14 with a bayonet, you're OK. Especially if the Garand and M-14 happen to be in shooting condition and are loaded with ammo.
and yeah, an SKS is good, but an AK is better. magazine compatibility, firepower, intimidation factor. survival mode. and it will take the same cartridges as the SKS. Just MHO.
The best weapon available lies between your ears and behind your eye-balls. If you can't make good use of that, you are screwed no matter how many calibers you pack.
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and die like a prince, should that be your fate.
HEY! Dont forget about being in top physical condition too. A person in better physic has a better chance of long term survival then most of our obese americans in our country today. Just another thing to think about.
Great post, I am getting in pretty late, but I agree with using common calibers, the 12 gauge, the .30-06,.22lr, but I differ on the .45. I know this is a common semi-auto, but I think a revolver would be more practical, in .357. you can use 38special as well, and a revolver is simple. So many options in bullet weight and configuration. I will make the mistake and assume that you or a member of your core group would be able to reload, and it is much easier recovering brass from a revolver than a semi, you might not be able to waste the time digging around for ejected cases.
Blueridge, your plan seems a lot like mine. Anybody see that "alone in the Wild" "reality show where the guy with the accent tries to live for 6 months in the Canadian North and mostly starves and is generally mizerable?
Heck whatever comes I'm standing my ground, I'm already in the hills and I been watching them storm clouds a comin fer some time. I've had a decade and a half of prep time and while I ain't got everything where I'd like it, we lost power for 2 weeks last year in the dead of winter and we held our ground. Good thing wee did cause I was hearing of evacuee's houses getting burglarized. The neighborhood pulled together,we cleared our street ourselves (big ice storm, lots fallen trees) and we muddled through. Our house was being taxed back in 1847, so we already are rigged for wood heating and cooking. We were on our own for a while as emergency vehicles couldn't have made it through, but hey We live in a place with good neighbors. Guns? We actually didn't need any. It was axes and chainsaws that were weapons of choice that week.
Just another thought, and I read it somewhere else: if you are truly in survival mode, it wouldn't hurt to have a mouse trap or two around. They don't take up much space, and they work. Just a thought.
Oh...forgot to mention; Lots of Duct tape...miles of it. Don't leave home without it!!
"Mr. Diehl, there is only so much room in the back of your station wagon."
On the run, I'd use a dirt bike.
"You and your muzzleloader are the ones doing the dreamy speculation here;"
You need to read back a little and get caught up on the conversation. As I noted before, the scenario posited by COMMA (you know, the guy who wrote the book in the op that started this thread, maybe you should read that first) there is no gov't and no currency. So you have two questions. What do you RUN WITH or, alternatively, if you're in a place that you want to defend, what do you HOLE UP WITH.
The muzzleloader was suggested for situations where you're defending a community, rather than running, because in the event of major catastrophes of the kind posited by COMMA, the supply of brass and nitro after a couple years is going to be severely limited. In contrast, anyone (anyone who can read a conversation and follow it, that is) can make blackpowder. The rest of the argument follows from there.
I really like the Remington Rand comment from John Dougherty.
One trivia about the 1911 pistol that I learned from Popular Mechanics: after the end of the Vietnam War and until its replacement by the Beretta, no new 1911's were acquired by the US military. They either just used the surplus guns from Vietnam, or rebuilt guns (or built entire guns) from the spares in the parts bin.
Not sure if that is true, though. At least PM features guns.
I think we all assumed a lot of different things when we posted our answers. Some were thinking Tom Hanks-talking-to-a-volleyball kind of survival in the wild, some were thinking of the Rodney King riots survival in the urban areas. Depends on where you live, I suppose. Or where you'll eventually end up.
I must point out that many people abandoned their homes during the Depression. And their farms. In fact, many people gave up everything except their cars (there's that Mad Max thing again). This is not to knock anyone's opinion, just to point out that not all farmers are self-sustaining. How many farmers still know how to stock seeds nowadays, when copyrighted hybrid/GMO seeds are fashionable? Who will supply pesticides? With American farming so monocultured, a bacteria or virus plague could wipe out entire areas. I'm not saying farmers aren't made of stern stuff, but without outside support, after a planting season or two, they might be leaving their farms too.
Meanwhile, there's Mexico. Just don't run into the drug gangs there, who are as heavily armed, if the news are correct, as the Mexican military. Canada it is then. OK, I'm just joking.
I basically agree with Petzal. My choices would be a Winchester lever action Mdl. 9422 (.22 cal.), a Kimber Elite Carry .45 ACP with Chip McCormack 8 round mags, a Scattergun Technologies Remington Police 870 with extended mag, tritium front sight, ghost ring rear, and my Springfield Arsenal SOCOM 16 (.308 20-rd mags) with a Zeiss Z-Point red dot sight. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if we need to wait for them to come for us, or us to boot them out. They keep pushing a Marxist/Socialist agenda, it's hard to say how folks will react.
Ruger 77/22 - Small game
Remington 870 in 12 gauge - Small game/birds, also general defense
H&K G3 - general purpose, also large game
M1A1 with a good scope - sniper weapon
M1911A1 - backup
M-60 - Because you never know when the s*** really will hit the fan
You know one thing that would be nice in the scenario being discussed?
No internet; and endless circular discussion from know -it-alls and proselytizers. (Is that even a word?)
I get the feeling that SOME of us will be disappointed if society somehow avoids the whole "damnation alley" scene.
I gotta go find a new tinfoil Stetson.
I'd look at it from 2 perspectives, first if you are gonna live long term in the hills you need to eat, if you need to eat then you need to hunt.
Quietly.
Bow & arrows and a accurate 22LR can do the job of feeding you without attracting unwanted attention.
Now, for defense I'd always have my 1911A1 and at least 2 spare mags on me at all times. More mags would be even better.
I'm assuming the family would be with me so we would have to have defensible shelter, an old mine or cave would be ideal, a 2 story brick building would also be good, an old farmhouse or something like it and preferably surrounded by fields where you can see any possible enemies coming from a distance. As has been said before, either a M4 or AK47 type weapon, .223 and 7.62x39 ammo would be pretty easy to come by. And for close quarters combat nothing beats a 12 Ga pump shotgun loaded with buckshot, with some slugs and bird shot it could do double duty as a food gathering as well as defense arm. I've got 2 Savage pumps, saw off one for a defensive arm and leave the other as a hunting/defense weapon as it is.
I would also have a 380 in a shoulder holster as a backup handgun, and the 44 Mag Redhawk on my right hip.
And remember, in a situation like that it's shoot first and ask questions later. Someone approaches where I'm at and is armed they will be shot at, if they are lucky and smart they will run away as quickly as humanly possible.
Hopefully dropping a weapon and some ammo along the way.
>:-)
Hehe, just had another thought, if we are holing up the best thing to do would be to have a weapon in every popular caliber, rifle, shotgun and pistol. Sure if it hits the fan and there are armed battles (assuming you survive them) you will probably be able to collect quite a few weapons and ammo, one thing I've always thought was stupid in movies, a guy with a club or knife manages to take out a guy with a gun, but doesn't pick up his gun and all the ammo he was carrying?
What was he thinking??????
GRAB ALL YOU CAN CARRY WHENEVER YOU CAN! That would apply to weapons, ammo, food, water, matches, fuel, whatever. If it gets so bad that there is wide scale rioting and looting just to survive it's every man for himself.
And another thing you need to do to prepare is talk to your friends and hopefully shooting and hunting buddies and arrange a plan for a worst case scenario ahead of time, so you can know who to trust if it happens, a group of families banding together has a better chance than one person.
Just staying put inside, not letting anyone know your intentions, essentially, keeping your f'n mouth shut about whats happening! Then:
.22 for those close in targets- not awares you're hidden inside-harrassing fire
12 ga. shotgun for those brave enough to charge the house
.300 Savage rifle for those targets down the street
.250 Savage rifle use this while letting the .300 cool down
30-06 scoped, for the longer shots
.223 scoped to take out and dismantle those not able to determine I mean it
I have 2000 rounds for each of these, plus a 6" 629 to take care of the survivors left in the street, "IF" there are any. Plus reloading abilities for each firearm. Then be ready to meet your Maker when all else fails!
Well, I'm not as fearful (or hopeful!) of a coming apocalypse as some of you seem to be. I don't see "forting up" and taking on all comers to be a good longterm survival strategy. What would be better is going to the remote backcountry (somewhere with good water and trees) with my family, and maybe 2 to 3 other families as well. That way we could form a community that is large enough to offer some mutual protection, but small enough to be beneath notice and not overtax the natural resources. Firearms would not be picked with the idea of using them for a "Red Dawn" scenario (we all remember what eventually happened to the Wolverines), but as possible self defense from individuals and small groups who might stumble across our camp and try to take our food and supplies from us, and on a daily basis for getting game.
For that purpose, I would want every family to have 2 guns, a .22LR and a .30-06, both in bolt action. I'd want everyone to have the same guns, for spare parts in case of damage. Since my trusty Remington 514 passed down from my great uncle isn't made anymore, I'd go with a Remington Model Five for the .22. For the .30-06, since I already have a Remington 700 BDL, that's what I'd suggest for everyone else. I'd also want a couple of flintlock muzzleloaders for the group, along with bullet molds, etc. as backup, and maybe a few recurve bows.
I'd also want at least a couple of German Shepherds (pref a male and female so they could breed), which could help alert us to people approaching our settlement.
Beyond that, some axes, saws, shovels, and sheath knives, my copies of "How to Stay Alive in the Woods" by Bradford Angier, "Peterson's Field Guide to Wild Edible Plants" and "Peterson's Field Guid to Medicinal Plants and Herbs."
A couple of gill nets (good for fish and birds), several spools of 15# test and a bunch of small and medium sized hooks.
Also, I'd bring some wire for making snares. Even without that, you can improvise a lot of deadfalls from natural materials. Oh, and I'd bring some seeds, something like pinto beans or lentils, that produces high-protein food that can be stored for long periods.
And actually making blackpowder is quite easy, you don't have to be a PhD chemist to make it. I'm only a masters-degreed chemist and I can do it. Charcoal is easily made, potassium nitrate is a little harder, but still within the realm of MacGyvering in the woods (at least for me, a chemist). Sulfur, you'd have to loot from a defunct drug store (but you could probably pick up premade potassium nitrate along with it)
focusfront
I wouldn't call $2.00 a round for 7.62 X 39 150 GR. JSP,
CHEEP or affordable.
kendix
I have just watched Glenn Beck's show, 19-15-2009. Look at who all is in charge now. I am afraid that unless there is a complete reversal of the political, idealogical, and spiritual direction of the country I and so many others have sworn to defend against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, we may indeed be in for some potential situations referred to in this discussion. It is time for those who remember the times when Americans like our founding fathers were held in high esteem, encourage those who don't, to use the ballot box to repel this onslaught of America-bashing socialism, marxism, and communism while we still have the chance. Otherwise, all this bravado may, unfortunately, be required.
As I live on an Island downstream from a large Metropolitan area, if things were to go to "hell in a handbasket" and need to rely on my own resources (as the constabulary and military undoubtedly would have their hands full), I would have ready my Marlin Model 70 .22LR repeater, my Remington Model 11-87 Semi-auto 12 Guage, my Sporterized Yugo M/47 bolt rifle in 8mm Mauser, my Colt Double Eagle (the Double Action version of a 1911).45 Auto and Beretta 92FS 9mm pistols. My wife can use the .22 Marlin for small game and I can use the 8mm Mauser for harvesting deer. The Remington 11/87 can double as a "riot control" and bird gun and the two handguns are enough to handle most any personal defense situations that should arise. Also plenty of ammunition for everything I mentioned.
Bolt action .223(most common ammo)
PUR Hiker Water filter
accurate .22 rifle
Diamond bow
I really don't plan on an apocalypse but its the last excuse I have to to buy more "toys"
Bella I agree a strong community and family is the best starting point.
In this scenario if I was in a situation where I had to grab some weapons and flee for my life I would go for the caliber before the weapon: 12ga.& 30-06 must be the most accessible ammo around the world (7.62x39 should be inserted) so that's my starting point.
Lettering is so small I can't read a word. Try to enlarge back to old style Dave.
If you want to have a reasonable idea of what might happen if we shoud experience a civilization threatening eventI suggest you read the book "Alas Babylon".It was writen quite a few years ago (perhaps the 50's or 60's)about the events that ocurr after world war 3. I forget the author but perhaps his first name was Pat. Of course it's fiction but not too bad a yarn.Youcan read it in an hour. It's food for thought, could even give you an idea or two. Otherwise, carry on.
If you want to have a reasonable idea of what might happen if we shoud experience a civilization threatening eventI suggest you read the book "Alas Babylon".It was writen quite a few years ago (perhaps the 50's or 60's)about the events that ocurr after world war 3. I forget the author but perhaps his first name was Pat. Of course it's fiction but not too bad a yarn.Youcan read it in an hour. It's food for thought, could even give you an idea or two. Otherwise, carry on.
Hey Gunslinger you want the print bigger?
If your running internet explorer, go up to the tool bar where it says view. click on view,then scrowl down to where it says zoom and a sub menu will pop out, scrowl to say 125% click on that and the print will be larger.
I completely agree with Reefmonkey, if you want to eat on at least a semi-regular basis, learn how to trap and snare, learn how to make fish traps etc. Bows and crossbows are great except remember you have limited resources. Arrows and bolts bend and break depending on their material. And, let's face it, eventually they will all get lost. You can learn how to make bows, arrows, and the seemingly simple atlatl-- a great ancient weapon that central american tribes used for hunting and as a weapon--went right through spanish breastplates! I believe everyone should own a good 22 rifle--for hunting, target practice,TEACHING others especially children good shooting fundementals and safety, and economically, its the most efficient. I would tend to go heavier in weight than most people if I did NOT have to pack it. The more accurate the better. I really like the Thompson Center 22's. They are ALL steel and VERY accurate. Yes, they tend to hold value even when bought used {ie, more expensive} but super accurate and reliable. One gun writer wrote that this is what the 10/22 should have been in the first place--before you drop the $200-$300 in it. Choice of 308 or 30/06 is probably obvious, and is on personal preference. Semi-auto is more fire power and less felt recoil, but you will also go through ammo faster, and with heavier ammo, you carry less. Bolt guns are more accurate in most cases, but slower in operation especially in stress. I'll buy one of each in the same calibre. Shotguns in 12 or 20 gauge depending on your size and experience. At close quarters, the shotgun is king. Most thugs hit with buckshot from either on, won't be able to notice the gauge before they croke. 12 carries more pellets in a heavier load but you pay for it in recoil. Again semi-autos have less felt recoil but pump actions are almost as fast in action and shrug off dirt and sand should it get in the action. Mossberg milspec 590 or an 870 are best in current pumps. Mixed reviews in my experience with Ithacas although I haven't shot the latest ones made in Ohio, I've heard good reviews on them. The 870 has been around forever, and has a proven combat record by the police and military. Should in the unlikely event it has a broken part, parts are easily available and any gunsmith can fix it if you can't figure it out. I'd get one in used good condition to save money for the previous reasons and out fit it for tactical use. I guess I'm most familiar with the 870 as it was my TO weapon in the service and I spent many lonely nights with one cradled in my arms---but thats -er- a different blog. Logistically you're carrying less shells for the bang due to size and weight. Mossbergs and Remingtons are the 10/22's of the shotgun world with a ton of aftermarket parts. For a pistol, I wouldn't carry anything in a calibre that didn't begin with the number "4." Most pistol calibres just don't have the traumatic shock of rifles, so you are going for blood loss (the bigger the bullet-the bigger the hole) and accuracy/bullet placement -head,heart/lungs,crotch--yes crotch, I've seen it end gun fights rather quickly, its great for constrained areas--aisle on a bus or train-- its pretty easy to hit on the draw, causes a bent-over reflex, and sets them up for the other two shots-- crotch shot on draw/ he bends over /two to the back of the head/game over. I've read some say how available the 9mm is, but most police have gone FROM the 9mm to 40 sw or 45 acp. A couple months ago you couldn't find 9mm, but I was buying 40 sw ON SALE! SIG Sauer, Glock, H&K, any of the mainstream 1911 companies are good choices. Again look for good conditioned used esp. in SIG,Glock and HK, they can probably shoot better than most people can hold them, and are durable enough to pass to your grandchildren. I usually buy pistols and revolvers full to mid size, as the ultra compacts have more felt recoil-think double tapping and follow up shots, are generally less accurate, loses the velocity of all that high priced defensive ammo you bought, and can get quirky with high velocity defensive ammo-due to the lower mass of the gun and higher recoil impulse,the rounds can move in the magazine, and can even cause the bullet to back into the shell case. This can produce jams and can also cause higher than normal case pressures.This is what happens sometimes when you are shooting regular ball ammo in practice, buy some hot +p ammo for defense that you would think would shoot better-it doesn't-then wonderif someone switched pistols on you. Plus if you have a big heavy pistol, you can crack him in the mellon if you run out of ammo. Lastly, I would get a good AR 15.I would go with a national match model-better sights,better trigger, better barrel, free floated, better fitted (more reliable). Clapsed stocks and re dots are ok up to about 200 yards, but then you target starts to be getting the same size as the dot and you start needing a better cheek weld to improve accuracy. I would go with the regular stocks, an A4 flattop folding back up sights, a good 1-5x20 or 30 mm scope (both eyes open at close quarters but enough magnification to go 600+ meters, tactical rings with picatinny tops to mount an ultra compact reddot for close quarters( burris fastfire2 or the similar trijicon) for say 0 to 75 meters. Regular 223is okay since as civilians we don't have the same constraints as the military, so we can shoot every thing from Varmint Grenade-think minimal ricochette but nasty wound-to the heavy long range stuff like Sierra Matchkings. Several good knives folding and fixed, several good big knives-TOPS Armeggedon and/or Cold Steel Trailmaster, tomahawk -I go back and forth between the Viet Nam models and the traditional-so I better get both, good compasses Silvas are simpler than lensatics but lensatics are more durable, good water filters with backups, meds and first aid, freezed dried bulk foods if I had the money or canned meats, brown rice, dried beans, dried fruits on the cheap, solar panels for basic electric and to charge deep cell batteries, rechargeable batteries for flashlights and walkie-talkies. But by far, the most important single thing for my survival would be....TO GET TO THE MAIL BOX BEFORE THE WIFE TO GET THE CREDIT CARD STATEMENT.
>But by far, the most important single thing for my survival would be....TO GET TO THE MAIL BOX BEFORE THE WIFE TO GET THE CREDIT CARD STATEMENT.
That is the gospel truth! Poppgunner just made the most important survival statement on the whole blog!!!!ROTFLMAO
Someone needs to reach out with that .30 cal and touch the monkey on my back!!! SGAREDNECK is right!!!
Fredd,
Hold....real.....still.......
Wow. I have been trolling threads for a long time and I have never, ever come across as much BS as this thread has in it. There is one person up there that has a little sense built into him and that is squaredneck.
Now, I am as much of a gun luvin', survivin' guy as the next, but what are these mobs that people keep talking about? Are there zombies that I should be worried about??
Have we, the readers of F&S, turned into a huge militia group? When in the history of the U.S. have there been any roaming mobs ready to take down your food supplies??
Sure is going to get lonley in the small towns with every single one of you "headin to the hills" in the event of any trouble. I'll be safe and warm in my house while you're in a tent trying to get by, while dodging the Russians while screaming WOLVERINES!!!
I agree with squaredneck. Rid yourself of the debt, be sensible and you'll be fine in the event of any unsettling times.
You all sound like 11 year old kids out camping after watching "Red Dawn".
Although by this point you probably aren't interested in my "choices" for zombie killin guns, but here are my choices for
1. Home defense: Modified Mossberg 500. Why a shotgun and not an AR-15? Well, you should know that, you're F&S readers afterall. There are LOTS of reasons. LOTS.
2. Food procurement: .308/30.06 Simple. Why? Availability of ammo. Versatility, etc.... Who needs a .338 RUM to, as you so eloquently put it, "Reach out and touch someone"?? Please. If a human is THAT far away and posing a threat they are most likely shooting BACK AT YOU.
3. Food procurement cont.: I have no arguments with the 10/22. A perfect rifle to have with you. Cheap, easy to use. Cheap, available ammo. Good choice.
4. I'll assume, since you are F&S readers that you are familiar with your OWN pistols. Why limit yourself to one particular model??? A 1911 in .45. Why? I cannot see a good reason as to why it cannot be a Glock in .45. I agree that having a pistol in your mini, zombie-killin arsenal is a good idea. The requirements for it to be a 1911 are absolutely ridiculous. I'll take my Glock.
And thank you Gritz, for throwing some more sense into the conversation.
If a body was considering "heading for the hills" they should have gone already. Fleeing a crisis with what you can carry (in whatever container, knapsack, car, trailer...) you become a refugee, you are already lost. When TSHTF it is already too late. Infrastructure takes time and thought as well as a lot of sweat. Awful hard to do in time of crisis. It is like other things,the time to start training in martial arts was 10 years ago, it wouln't do you any good to start learning Tai Kwon Do tomorrow if the crash happens the day after tomorrow.
You can't expect to just hit the hills and squat there. People like me usually already own them hills and If you ain't already made nice with me you can't camp in my woods. I do expect to wind up takin in some refugees, we always have, the law of Hospitality is sacred to us. But taking us for granted doesn't invoke the hospitality of the house, rather the opposite.
So If you think you might need to ditch yer comfy suburban tickeytackey cardboard box of a house and flee someplace rural you should be making the arrangements now, making the social connections where you might feel safe to be now, because it will be much too late once TSHTF. If you don't do your research and your background work it will not matter what kind of gun you have, because if you go out into the "sticks" and attempt to get pushy with the locals, you'll likely find out quickly what kinda guns THEY have...
As far as 1911 vs Glock, plastic guns may not rust as much but I understand a Glock is worn out after something like 10,000 rounds, then it is a paperweight. The 1911 is still around because it is a lot like a Jeep, nearly infinately rebuildable, with more parts available than can easily be imagined. Anyway Jeeps and 1911 automatics kinda go together anyway...
Flyer22,
I truly appreciate the comments you made there. I am not that smart, it's just that after all of the SHTF talk I heard around here(locally), I sat down one night and I got out my notepad, and tried to get my personal priorities down in order of importance. The "Red Dawn" scenario is probably far fetched, but it makes for a good story(I have heard that someone is actually working on a remake of the movie as we speak). That plays to our patriotism, our inner-John Wayne, or whoever your hero may be this week.
The having a stack of guns and ammo is credible, but what good is it if your house is on the verge of foreclosure? The 'I'm gonna hole up in the hills' thing is going to work for some folks better than others. I would think that if a catastrophic event(or series of them) happened, what you would see would be
some chaos in some metro areas (i.e. New Orleans post-Katrina) and you would see relative calm(backed by vigilance) in more rural areas. I had work in the Gulf Coast region right after Katrina, and I can tell you firsthand that I saw folks for the most part sticking together in Mississippi where I was at. Things were as bad as I have ever seen them, but the people I were around were not hopeless. I think that came from an inner sense of self-reliance mixed with a willingness to work with others. I think that point has been touched on here through all the talk of what .50 cal. sniper rifle is the best.
Be of good character, try to pick good friends. Put yourself, family, friends in a position where you are not heavily dependent on others. Be willing to help others. Don't be too proud to be helped. The ways to be independent should be self-evident. You do need to be armed. You also need to have water, food, shelter, meds, and all the essential things thought about.
Moral: Living your life is going on right now and will tomorrow too. Get and be prepared, but don't be blinded by SHTF and such. Take time to personally evaluate what real position you are in.
p.s. Bella, I often disagree with you, but without your unique take on things it would be a lot less colorful here. I disagree on the 1911, but only for my own self. If the Glock works for you that is the one to have. I love the idea of the cannon and mortar. When was the last time you heard of someone who owned yard artillery having problems with zombies? NEVER.
S GA redneck
My remington 870, obviously,
another 870 SPS SuperSlug, a Marlin 1895 lever action shotgun, and a H&K USP, or maybe M500 pistolgrip with extended magazine. (You can tell I like shotguns)
There is sense in my shotgun obsession. The 870 obvious. The SPS would be great for long range. Saw off the stock on the Marlin and you have some Terminator related awesomnes. And you always need a good .45.
My cannons are my treasures, I figure I could take out a truck with the 27mm, it fires a 4 ounce ball. The Mortar would be best used as a mortar, it could be very handy to be able to put smoke bombs down range. Wanna spoil that hidden snipers aim? Smoke bomb! Tom Robbins wrote about the "Batsh-t and Frootloops" smoke bomb in "Still Life with Woodpeckers" (a fine work of entertaining fiction).
Still anybody with access to the makings for a potato cannon has light artillery. If it will throw a potato the length of a football field, it would as likely throw something else of similar weight and caliber. Potato cannons hit HARD. PVC pipe is cheap.
In the real "Mad Max" kind of scenario I think a simple break-at-the-breach 12 gauge shotgun with GaugeMate adapters would allow you to use almost any shotshells you manage to aquire in one gun. I have tested the 12-20 and the 12-.410 adapters (I didn't see any point in the 12-16 or the 12-28 gauge adapters), the ones I tried out gave good patterns. I don't see any sense in storing ammo that doesn't fit your arms, but if rounds get scarce it might be handy to use whatever one can scrounge. Shotshells can often be reloaded as long as one has powder, primers and shot. I always wanted to get to play with some fletchettes, I've only seen videos of what they can do to a target, Ohhh science.
Then there is the humble fougass...'nuff said.
I have always maintained that any intelligent bodger who ever watched an episode or two of "McGyver" ought to be able to figure out surprises enough, just by misusing todays technology...
I liked the guy who brought up spears, no weapon ever created ever became "obsolete". The weapon that kills the most people every year around the globe is still the Machete (panga, barong etc.)More folks get hacked down with big knives than get shot with AK's. Spears still work too. Don't forget, a rock is still lethal in most hands. It is always better to make friends than try to kill one another, but if folks are hostile and unco-operative then sometimes you have to hurt them. Anything goes then, as long as you can dominate that mad minute and not loose control. Going berserk and overdoing it is very bad. Indeed it is actually the only thing I've ever been in trouble for!
Sooooo, in the "Glock vs 1911" argument:
How many rounds are you going to have with you?
How many zombies are you planning on shooting, 10,000??
You have THREE other guns.
The argument about 1911 vs Glock is a mute point.
That is pronounced "moot" for those of you who don't know.
The most important weapon when and IF the SHTF:
Community.
Squaredneck painted the picture perfectly. The closest we have gotten to the s$*t hitting the fan at any point in recent memory is the mass devastation of a major event such as a hurricane. During these times if everyone took to the hills and waited for the chaos to clear up, nothing would get done.
I am not advocating watching out for your yourself and your loved ones by being prepared. Quite the opposite. Be prepared first. Save your family before you focus on someone else. But after you have solidified your safety, it is then time to help your fellow man because the help you will receive from them in return may perhaps save your own life in the event of the "SHTF".
On a tangent:
These "mobs" that people speak of. Uh....won't they be armed as well? Outnumbered + outgunned = dead.
I'm glad that I'm still not convinced that we will ever see roving mobs of people roaming the country/city side for our MRE's.
This is fascinating. Having a muzzleloader is a great idea, but I'm curious how many of the folks here know how to use a muzzleloader. I mean a real one, not one of those inline, Pyrodex pellet machines. And while it does make sense to have a flintlock under the theory that you'll run out of caps, you're still going to need powder.
My dream survival fortress is the basement of the couple in Tremors (the wife was played by Reba McIntyre).
In-lines are real muzzle loaders. They load through the muzzle just like the rest of them. There's no real difference in muzzleloaders until you roll back to the wheel-locked arquebus.
My in-line will shoot nitro, black powder, synthetics, whatever you want. It's not the sort of thing that appeals to the wierdos in the coonskin caps and buckskin, but they're just pretenders anyhow.
"Weirdos" and "pretenders?" What's the deal, Diehl?
The deal is I'm not fan of snobs of any kind. If the buckskin crowd were honest they'd admit that any well made traditional sidelock cap n ball rifle can shoot as well as any in-line muzzleloader. The objections are all hype. And if the buckskin crowd weren't hypocrites, then while they're turning up their noses at the in-lines for not being properly ancient in design (by the way, the first IN-LINE muzzleloader was made in the 1830s), they'd make sure that they don't use a quad, a gps, a gas lantern, an electronic watch, a cell phone, a USGS 7.5 minute map, a credit card, or any fabric for any purpose not made out of cotton or wool during the entirety of their hunt. Otherwise they're just faking "tradition."
Well said. I detest snobs.
anyone actually read the book?
Mmm, a bit touchy? I also don't hunt in a coonskin cap or buckskin. I shoot a muzzleloader because I appreciate the lines and feel of the firearm, and I respect the distance limitations it puts on me through range and the use of iron sights vs scope. The point was I have never seen a flintlock inline.
And who's the snob? Looking down your nose at those who do enjoy the buckskin mountain man look aren't you?
I'm not looking down my nose at anyone. I'm just telling anyone who sez my in-line isn't a "real" muzzleloader that they're a addle-pated feeble brained knock-kneed bunch-backed sad sack.
You guys need to get off the blog and go hunting or shooting! The BS is getting a bit deep.
Next Issue: Predict the end of the United States, using the Solunar tables!
Remington 870 12 ga pump if I could have only one gun this would be it.
Remington 700 30-06 so many bullets everywhere.
Ruger 10/22 mainly for food and bullets are cheap and everywhere.
In all truth if you are going full scale war you need a fully automatic .223. Parts are readily available.
buckets of 22 lr, 204 ruger, 223, 270, 30-30, 308, 338 win mag, 45-70, 12 ga and my favs in 9 mm and 40 s&w and the tools to use them all, scope all you can afford, buy some night optics too. keep some xbows too .... and reload :)
just a hunting story here too .... wife complains that all the cute deer and tasty turkeys seem to be gone from the farm .. and we see very few deer around our place ... but lots of coyotes. so - out with the 204 ruger last sunday morning at 5:30 am to get set up at the edge of my big forest - gonna call em out with a mouse squeak :) ... well, i took 30 steps out my door and two run past me in the dark - one big one and one smaller one .. RIGHT AT MY HOUSE FOR CRYIN OUT LOUD. I stop frozen thinking WTF! they saw me arounf the corner of the house and are long gone ... so i sit down on the lawn on the hillside .. as the sun comes up a bit i start to scope the field - still sitting beside my house .. and there i can see 4 deer in the field about 250 yards from the house out toward he front gate. The deer are grazing and i scan back toward the forest looking for coyotes thinking i should just head back in the go back to sleep as i have been spotted and feel like trying another day. the sun is coming up higher and i am still thinking about quitting but decide to take a last look at the three deer (remember i and the wife have not seen many). Well, they are now about 400 yards away but through the scope i now see the "deer" were in fact three other coyotes that had been grazing for mice with their heads down LOL. i ordered a night scope so next time i can see better :) some of you should appreciate i would not shoot what i could not really see.
While most people (myself included) have approached this question by giving their dream list of what they would want by their side with little thought about weight, bulk, or issues of transporting all this stuff (especially if they found themselves hiking to somewhere remote), some people have posted such concerns that a huge arsenal would not be practical if you were on the run. I am surprised that none of the latter group has recommended something like an AR-7 survival rifle or the civilian version of the M6 Aircrew Survival Weapon.
Both weapons are light and compact, as they were designed for the Air Force, to give a downed airman a survival weapon for getting game and some self-defense.
The AR-7 is a semiautomatic firing .22 LR. It usually comes with an 8 round magazine, but larger magazines can be purchased. The rifle weighs a scant 2.5 pounds. It breaks down into 4 pieces (barrel, magazine, stock, and action), with the action, magazine and the barrel storing inside the stock, which floats in water. Fully assembled, it is 35 inches long; broken down with components stored in the butt it is 17 inches long. Light and compact, easy to slip into a backpack, this would be my number one choice for an ultralite "head for the hills in a hurry" escape.
The M6 is a superimposed "over-under" survival rifle, with an 18 inch overall barrel. The top barrel fires a .22 hornet, bottom barrel fires a .410 shotgun shell.
Advantages of the M6 are that the more powerful .22 Hornet can take a larger variety of game and be better for self-defence than .22 LR of the AR-7. The .410 as well, would give more flexibility when going for game or for defense. Disadvantages compared to the AR-7 would be that the M6 is less compact, and its single-shot design versus the AR-7's semiauto capacity. Since I, personally don't consider a .410 all that useful, nor do I consider the .22 hornet THAT much more versatile for general survival shooting, I would want the AR-7's compactness, rapid fire, and ease in finding .22 LR ammunition.
3 Remington 870 Wingmasters. With rifled and smooth bore barrels.
As many shells and slugs as I can find.
A Bolt Action 30.06 with as many shells as I can find.
3 870's provide 2 shotguns with 1 used for parts to keep the other two going.
30.06 for larger game like moose, elk, deer, and zombie's.
Anyone remember the NY riots back in the 60's?
LA riots just a few years ago?
People can get real ugly real fast given the right circumstances, And it usually seems to be city folks who start the $h*t!
It's a big part of why I live in the hick town (calling it a town is a stretch for the group of houses round here) and not in a big town or city.
I can walk out back and find deer, rabbit and squirrel to eat if needed, and as been mentioned trapping is one thing we all should learn to do, sure hunting is more fun for recreation but in survival situations you need to be able to trap game. Much more efficient way to gather food!
I hope it never gets to that, but we should be prepared for the worst as best we can be.
I live in the middle of nowhere, on good black gardening soil with several free-flowing wells, so I'm not going anywhere. However, if everything really went pear shaped and I had to leave...
1) a centerfire rifle
--hmmm... looking at the gun rack I think I'd take
a Winchester 88, mostly because it's the only
one I have with sights, just in case something
happens to the scope. It's a .243; .308 might be
better. Oh well.
2) a .22 pistol
--I have an early Ruger automatic that would work,
I guess. It's a rabbit killer, and I actually do
own a holster for it. I don't own many holsters.
3) a 12 gauge shotgun, sawed-off
--It would pain me greatly, but I think I would
chop up this cherry 1906 Ithaca side by side I
picked up at an auction. Pistols are fine, but
you just never know when you need to go all Mad
Max on someone.
4) ??????
--That's enough to carry. However, since I have
one choice left for the thought experiment, I'll
add the one gun list: a .22 rifle. In that
scenario I think I'd take a Marlin 39A. I'd be
pretty comfortable in the post-apocolyptic world
with a golden boy in tow.
Having a complete survival kit with food, water, first aid, medications, camping supplies, tools, fuel, etc...is very smart.
And along with your kit, a full array of weapons for protection, hunting, etc... are necessary. My personal choices are Mossberg 500 8 shot, Stainless Mini 14 w/20 mags, Stainless Ruger 10/22 w/20 mags, Sako 3006 w/3x9, Sig P220 45 ACP w/10 mags. Guns are important, but ammo will be king! It will be worth much more than $$. I store approx. 75,000 assorted rounds. All in easy to move/locked ammo cans. I also have a 70lb compound bow, 177 cal Gamo pellet rifle and a even sling shot (Don't laugh! I've killed many rabbits and squirrels with it and if necessary at 25 ft, I would have a pretty good chance of putting a dent in someone's head". I also have a reloader for center fire and 12 gauge. Along with the reloader I have approx 5 lbs powder that can also be used for explosives if needed. However the most important item I have are written PLANS! Written steps and plans for "what to do" in different scenarios. If we stay home there's a plan covering everything from security to scavaging. If we need to leave area, theres a separate plan for that to. It covers vehicle prep, detailed list of items to take, specific destinations, routes, communication with family, etc... When an emergency happens, it's not necessarily the items you have but what you do with them that will determine you and your families chances for survival. Stay calm, expect the unexpected and be prepared to act quickly and without hesitation.
Well it's been almost a year now, and not much has happened . The Protests and town hall meeting's have had and will continue to have positive effects several of the worst politicians in D. C. have either announced impending retirement's or are unlikely to be reelected. They are having problems trying to pass much of the crap they have in mind. I do feel a lot better than I did before. But the thing to do between now and the primary elections is to either RUN FOR OFFICE (I intend too)or pay attention to who does!!!!!!!!!!!
All I need in the "coming collapse" is toilet paper, duct tape, and a 12 guage.
give me a M-16A3 with a scope a backpack a .22 rimfire and glock-18c in .45 acp and i'll be fine
Post a Comment
AlaskanExile,
It took me a couple of passes to catch what some folks are saying. 'Chappie's tape' - LMAO!!!! So true. If it gets to that point things have s#!+ the bed definitely.
AmFlyer- Mindset>skillset>toolset +1 for you on that
Just be courteous and don't bring the mob by my house if you please.LOL
Clay; I'm with you. Don't let anybody get anywhere near you with that FN Five-Seven, that is one lethal, traumatic round! That's what I was saying, engage them before they can get a shot off, because the ammo they can buy will penetrate body armor and kevlar helmets, that's what it's sole purpose in life is to do.
I was just joking about the 338, to let you know there's no hard feelings on my part. I have two boxes of Hornady 225's and another of 250's at home that I load up because they are cheap and accurate.
It's kind of funny that you ask about this subject, seeing as how I have been "preparing" for SHTF for several years. Since I already have the firearms, I have been stocking up on ammo. Here are the ones I plan to keep close at hand if need be.
1. Barrett M82
2. Thompson 1927A1
3. Springfield 1911
4. Browning .25-06
5. Ruger 10/22
6. several shotguns and handguns of various gauge and caliber.
Definitely a crossbow. Definitely.
If I had a choice I'd bring along my Rem. 740 in 30-06, my Ruger 10-22, a gilli suit, and a Raytheon thermal imager. Any thing else I needed could be picked up safely at night from the hordes of Democrats who tried to play catch up but got smoked trying to figure out why the shotgun shell won't go in the handgun!
Back to the subject at hand.
What you need is a rifle etc. that shoots the enemies cartridge with the ability to shoot accurately farther allowing you to be out of there range while they are well within yours!
A fiberglass recurve bow with extra bow strings and lots of arrows. (Silent and effective, if one practices. And I would.)
Crossbow and lots of bolts, plus enough spare parts to fix/repair it over the years, and make more bolts.
My Hogue-stocked all-weather Ruger 10-22 with iron sights and a 4x scope and several 10-round clips. (A tough, reliable, nearly perfect little rifle.)
My 7x57 Mauser or 7x57 AI, and my .257 Roberts or .257 AI, in all-weather stocks, equipped with iron sights and best-quality 4x to 6x fixed power scopes. Preferably Remington 700 long actions, 22"-24" barrels, treated with all-weather coatings. Two spare barrels per rifle (already chambered, blued and weatherized) and parts and tools to clean/repair/rebuild anything that goes wrong over the years. If I could only take one rifle, it would probably be the 7x57 Mauser (along with several hundred cases) or .257 AI (ditto on cases).
1 extra 4x-6x fixed power scope per rifle. Enough parts, bases, rings and screws to remount scopes (several times) on all rifles.
My personal Beretta Model 92. Three or four clips. A spare barrel. Spare recoil rod, recoil spring, and firing pin.
As much H-100V, H4350, H414 and Varget powder as I could store in caves, cabins, cairns and other sheltered places, along with as many bullets and primers as I could store in these assorted places, too, including (preferably) several thousand .22 Long Rifle shells in each place. (I would use the 10-22 on small game and would handload the centerfire cartridge(s) the old fashioned way, using an analog scale and a simple press with appropriate (and spare) dies. No electricity necessary.)
Winchester 12-gauge pump action Defender.
Leatherman Skeletool.
Several magnesium spark-striker firestarters.
A magnifying glass. A spare one, too.
My original issue compass. A spare one, too.
Topographical maps (to cover all foreseeable ranges and territories one might cover/travel/evade/hunt/start over in) in weatherproof coating.
A Katadyn water purifier and enough spare filters and parts to last 20 years.
Camelback water bag or similar, plus spare canteens.
A titanium cup, plate, pot, pan and utensils.
A guide to edible plants in the Americas, with photos.
Shakespeare.
Churchill.
Mozart.
Bach.
Ella F.
Pens, paper.
Great woman.
Hope.
I've seen a lot of good guns listed. Most of you have good ideas about what you would take and how you would do things to make it through the collapse of all as we know it.
Here's my list, explanation will follow.
1. my remington 597 .22lr
2. rem 870 12 ga. shotgun
3. my marlin .30-30
4. rem model 700 30-06
5. 1911 model pistol in 9mm
6. pump action bb gun
7. sks
ok, here's my reasoning. First off, my remington 597 has server me well over the past few years. it hasn't had any problems, and i like its light weight and its accuracy. i might swap it for a 10/22 if i had the chance just for the fact that the ruger is reliable and there are just so damn many of them out there.
shotgun to me would be a mainly close quarter defense weapon. birds just wouldn't be worth the use of the bulky shells. i would have to keep it in storage unless absolutely needed.
my marlin 30-30 would be an absolute must have. i've had it for ten years, and have had no problems out of it. never had a scope on it because it's not a reach out and touch you kind of gun. it's a good deer rifle as long as you don't shoot like crap.
the 30-06 would be more of a warning weapon. i could keep people at a distance with that. you can't go wrong with a weapon that can reach at least 300 yds without too much drop.
The 1911 model in 9mm would be my handgun simply because 9mm is so widely available. think about it, military use it, police use it in swat applications. it would be so easy to raid a deserted station or armory for some 9mm ammo.
the bb gun would be a necessity. you can store so dang many bbs or pellets compared to shotgun shells or even centerfire rifle ammo. those bbs easily bring down roosting birds. face it, you're not going to be just hunting for doves, pheasant or grouse if things were to go south.
focusfront has it right with the sks, which is one reason why i have it on my list. as i said on the 9mm ammo, the sks ammo is everywhere. wouldn't be hard to scavenge ammo for that gun and have plenty of it laying around for defense purposes and hunting game.
other than the usual suspects stashed for survival, i like my list and have no problem supporting it.
1. MOSSBERG 590A1 shotgun
2. xmd springfield and armory 9mm handgun 19+1.
3. SPRINGFIELD AND ARMORY M14 308 round SOCOM Edition
4. Colt AR-15 M4 .223 with ACOG x4 SCOPE
5. 2000 rounds of each.
6. Spotting scope
7. Dont forget your Jeep wrangler on 35inch Super Swampers,hunting chair and BEER hah!
Mike i have to agree with 86RAM even if the country collapsed you think the us military doesnt have a SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) For this kind of scenario? Mike your wrong and even if we ran out of resources any brother in the military or that has served in combat would previal agianst a civilian mob or mobs in most cases. Im not gonna sit here all day arguing why and why not but mybe i take it personnaly since im the US military myself. God Bless America and everyone who ever fouhgt or died fighting for this great country of ours.
Dave-If you can bet out of New York, come to the cabin in the hills and we will take on the world.GPW
i am not so sure that THE weapon is as important as knowing how and when to use it, AND having PLENTY of ammo available. i am not sure if a total breakdown of scociety is coming, but a total breakdown of the economy is an absoloute certainty. the big thing is going to be having a stronghold where you can ride out the storm. it had better be a good one, as it is lilely to be a long, ugly mess. do not forget medical supplies! remember this, a war is won by three things, food & water, ammo, and morphine. anybody know where i can buy a couple of 55 gallon drums of morphine??? LOLOL! not quite, but it is almost time to lock and load my freinds.
take a sks 7.62x39fiberglass red stocker,a bolt action 22 and a 835 mossberg 12 ga a 9mm pistol and a muzzle loader 50-54 cal and a cross bow plus a few traps and snares
To start an outcry, how come no one's given my mini-14 any love? Light, handy, long proven, and ubiquitous ammo.
Secondly, I'm not military, but I've done my share of backpacking with 60-80 loads and I think 60 lbs of just weapons and ammos is unrealistic. If you're out in the boonies and not as an assaulter, I think your other survival gear might need to come first. If anyone's ever spent a night out in the mountains without, how quickly would you have traded a second long gun for a good sleeping bag and a tarp? I think the general list of guns show a typical full toolbox for around the house and for defending such, but 35 lbs of weapons, plus similar ammo to feed them all is a hell of a load for an individual out walking. You'll also be toting 50lbs of camping gear. In a long term scenario, you're packing for an all weather expedition, not a patrol.
Now if you assume that you're moving with a party of at least 2 or 3, and most of us family guys are, I think everyone having a centerfire rifle and a good handgun (Glock in .45 for me thanks) for defensive purposes and then splitting up the .22s and shotguns between members makes a lot more sense and saves weight. In a firefight, I want everyone to be simultaneously well armed for it. I can't picture the scenario where so many squirrels are present that we'll each need a 22 and a 12 gauge ready to take down the varmits at peril of our lives.
To start an outcry, how come no one's given my mini-14 any love? Light, handy, long proven, and ubiquitous ammo.
Secondly, I'm not military, but I've done my share of backpacking with 60-80 loads and I think 60 lbs of just weapons and ammos is unrealistic. If you're out in the boonies and not as an assaulter, I think your other survival gear might need to come first. If anyone's ever spent a night out in the mountains without, how quickly would you have traded a second long gun for a good sleeping bag and a tarp? I think the general list of guns show a typical full toolbox for around the house and for defending such, but 35 lbs of weapons, plus similar ammo to feed them all is a hell of a load for an individual out walking. You'll also be toting 50lbs of camping gear. In a long term scenario, you're packing for an all weather expedition, not a patrol.
Now if you assume that you're moving with a party of at least 2 or 3, and most of us family guys are, I think everyone having a centerfire rifle and a good handgun (Glock in .45 for me thanks) for defensive purposes and then splitting up the .22s and shotguns between members makes a lot more sense and saves weight. In a firefight, I want everyone to be simultaneously well armed for it. I can't picture the scenario where so many squirrels are present that we'll each need a 22 and a 12 gauge ready to take down the varmits at peril of our lives.
I have a family member that worked and lived in South Africa several years ago, when the whites still had control and owned a lot of the farms. He sent me farm magazines that were loaded with firearm advertisements, some real heavy duty stuff, my favorite being a 12 gauge shotgun that had a round canister that held at least a dozen shells. It looked just like the tommy guns you saw gangsters carrying in movies from the 1930's. It was one of the first things that Clinton banned from the USA. Anyone who lived in the country was armed to the teeth, iron bars and shutters over their windows, the whole bit. They obviously had spent a lot of time thinking about defending themselves against hostile mobs.
Moishe, then that leaves the mobs. Odds are getting better.
Flame Thrower so the game I shot would be ready to eat.
Bella, the cannon would be great for one shot unless you have a clear avenue and time for a reload.
nc30/06, yup and I think the oath keeper would help against the mobs.
Just having a little fun, Moishe. C'mon, are you going to tell me you haven't fantacized about your own "Red Dawn" moment?
"If we are talking about complete breakdown not just of the government and economy but civilization itself, then the ability to fire one slow shot from a flintlock (unless you know how to get hold of fulminate of mercury for a percussion cap), when nobody else shoot at all, would have value."
Excatly the reason to have a muzzle-loader. As I noted before, the whole question is really several questions all rolled into one. If you're defending a community you make one choice, if you're running another, and if you think long term societal collapse is the order of business, you make a plan with some time-depth. The muzzle-loader backup is a hedge against long-period collapse.
"But most doomsday scenarios involve short-term survival, a couple of years at the most, before some kind of government again raises its head."
Sure. The thing is this is all speculation. You plan for what may happen not what you're confident would happen.
"Even if the bad times last for a couple of years, five hundred rounds of centerfire rifle ammo, the same for pistol, five thousand rounds of .22 Long Rifle, and a hundred shotgun shells should allow you to hold out.."
Sure, as long as you are more or less in a rural area and not having to fight an insurgency trying to deprive you of what you have.
Let's all admit, this is an interesting fantasy and a fun exercise to speculate, but in the end unless you live in one seriously remote location it'd take a lot of luck on top of any prep you do. Still it makes sense to take preparations. My personal attitude has been to always have a few months food, plus the ability to hold on to it against less than casual intrusion while having water and heat if the grid goes down. Any more than that and I just live too close to a major metropolis. A brief food riot and violence and you can hold your own. 8 million hungry people beginning to scour the countryside will also organize and the worst of people already are, so good luck with that. 10 million survivalists against 300 million scavengers is going to be tough, particularly when the decisions you make will blur the lines of right and wrong at every point. Even 1 man on a wall being worth 10 beneath might not be enough. That's without having second thoughts about denying others respite. Civil unrest and shortages I think you can reasonably prepare for and if everyone behaved responsibly before time wouldn't be much of an issue, but they won't, so it will. Civil collapse would be a razor that would pare down to a lucky few. A full collapse I think is less likely than you think even in these times. In the end the resources all exist and even if the currency dies the black market and cottage industries will pick up or the country would have the common sense to realize what a huge proportion of natural resources we have at home no matter our currency troubles and withdraw from the world stage. The number one rule of real estate will come into play. I'm sure we could re-organize to provide sufficient energy to agriculture to keep things moving. The govt health plan would probably go on hold..
You might be better off working on your language skills. If things got that bad in our great land, SOME world power will happily step in and supervise.
The book sounds like World War Z or The Zhombie Survival Guide by Max Brooks but with a real experience bend. They're both highly interesting and entertaining reading if anyone's curious. The lessons are the same.
Mr. Deihl
As far as the miliary goes I know what I'm talking about and I agree very strongly with Moishe comment about not attacking civilians and family members.
Also we took an oath and we will defend the nation and I'm pretty sure alot of vets and other civilians would band together with them and law enforcement to help delay and defend any outpost set up against any mob.
There are many things other than fuel.
I don't need tanks, gunships or CAS to take out targets.
There are many other toys out there to play with that are simple yet effective.
Food can be found almost anywhere.
"As another, other aside, I think the U.S. military is the most powerful thing stalking the planet"
Yes. When it can bring force multiplying assets to bear it's pretty much unstoppable. Without that, it's not particularly more dangerous than any army from any age in history.
"however I think the U.S. soldier is also one of the most moral"
IMO the US armed forces are a cross section of society and is comprised of all kinds. I think, I hope, that it would never face the test of some sort of major societal collapse. That said, the scenario posited by Comma is pretty extreme. No government, so to whom will the US armed forces answer? No value to currency, so how will it obtain food unless by conscription? Once you start robbing people to maintain yourself institutionally, you make enemies. Would the US armed forces or some subset place its own institutional existence ahead of civil liberties or even insert itself as a kind of junta on the civil population's back? One hopes not.
But I don't see anyone feeding something the size of a regimental combat team on worms and bugs they've been trained to eat in E&E school and yet remain a field effective force, regardless of what a few Machismo hampered members of the forum may assert.
You pretty much have an answer for everything there mr Deihl... I'm no General Smart a$$.. never claimed to be... I just know the capabilities of one of the greatest militaries in the modern world and the will of free men and women.
Food can be found almost everywhere... you gotta remember in a chaotic situation abandoned homes, stores etc.. source of food. MRE's source of food... stockpiles food. Farms, Crops, Wildlife.
If you have a defensive position it will probably have a water source and food stores.
What I speak of has nothin to do with guns... it has to do with improvising... using your head thinking outside the box.. High Speed.
I don't know why some people want to paint the military as some kind of thugs that are just gonna turn on it's own people or just fall apart in a scenerio filled with chaos. That just breeds mistrust which obviuosly is seen in some statements.
Anyways enough of this bickering and knit picking... We got way off subject.. you have your opinion I have mine.
would depend on what I'm running from or to. Most of us have nevere had to survive in the wild, so better consider what it takes to make in the woods. Yes, guns are necessary, but many other items are as important. I would make a list that would fit in my pack to take along. A quality knife would also be a great item to have if you can shoot game. Guns; again depends on what you prefer to do, kill or live.
and yeah, an SKS is good, but an AK is better. magazine compatibility, firepower, intimidation factor. survival mode. and it will take the same cartridges as the SKS. Just MHO.
The best weapon available lies between your ears and behind your eye-balls. If you can't make good use of that, you are screwed no matter how many calibers you pack.
Pray for the best, prepare for the worst, and die like a prince, should that be your fate.
Great post, I am getting in pretty late, but I agree with using common calibers, the 12 gauge, the .30-06,.22lr, but I differ on the .45. I know this is a common semi-auto, but I think a revolver would be more practical, in .357. you can use 38special as well, and a revolver is simple. So many options in bullet weight and configuration. I will make the mistake and assume that you or a member of your core group would be able to reload, and it is much easier recovering brass from a revolver than a semi, you might not be able to waste the time digging around for ejected cases.
Blueridge, your plan seems a lot like mine. Anybody see that "alone in the Wild" "reality show where the guy with the accent tries to live for 6 months in the Canadian North and mostly starves and is generally mizerable?
Heck whatever comes I'm standing my ground, I'm already in the hills and I been watching them storm clouds a comin fer some time. I've had a decade and a half of prep time and while I ain't got everything where I'd like it, we lost power for 2 weeks last year in the dead of winter and we held our ground. Good thing wee did cause I was hearing of evacuee's houses getting burglarized. The neighborhood pulled together,we cleared our street ourselves (big ice storm, lots fallen trees) and we muddled through. Our house was being taxed back in 1847, so we already are rigged for wood heating and cooking. We were on our own for a while as emergency vehicles couldn't have made it through, but hey We live in a place with good neighbors. Guns? We actually didn't need any. It was axes and chainsaws that were weapons of choice that week.
Oh...forgot to mention; Lots of Duct tape...miles of it. Don't leave home without it!!
I really like the Remington Rand comment from John Dougherty.
One trivia about the 1911 pistol that I learned from Popular Mechanics: after the end of the Vietnam War and until its replacement by the Beretta, no new 1911's were acquired by the US military. They either just used the surplus guns from Vietnam, or rebuilt guns (or built entire guns) from the spares in the parts bin.
Not sure if that is true, though. At least PM features guns.
I think we all assumed a lot of different things when we posted our answers. Some were thinking Tom Hanks-talking-to-a-volleyball kind of survival in the wild, some were thinking of the Rodney King riots survival in the urban areas. Depends on where you live, I suppose. Or where you'll eventually end up.
I must point out that many people abandoned their homes during the Depression. And their farms. In fact, many people gave up everything except their cars (there's that Mad Max thing again). This is not to knock anyone's opinion, just to point out that not all farmers are self-sustaining. How many farmers still know how to stock seeds nowadays, when copyrighted hybrid/GMO seeds are fashionable? Who will supply pesticides? With American farming so monocultured, a bacteria or virus plague could wipe out entire areas. I'm not saying farmers aren't made of stern stuff, but without outside support, after a planting season or two, they might be leaving their farms too.
Meanwhile, there's Mexico. Just don't run into the drug gangs there, who are as heavily armed, if the news are correct, as the Mexican military. Canada it is then. OK, I'm just joking.
Ruger 77/22 - Small game
Remington 870 in 12 gauge - Small game/birds, also general defense
H&K G3 - general purpose, also large game
M1A1 with a good scope - sniper weapon
M1911A1 - backup
M-60 - Because you never know when the s*** really will hit the fan
I'd look at it from 2 perspectives, first if you are gonna live long term in the hills you need to eat, if you need to eat then you need to hunt.
Quietly.
Bow & arrows and a accurate 22LR can do the job of feeding you without attracting unwanted attention.
Now, for defense I'd always have my 1911A1 and at least 2 spare mags on me at all times. More mags would be even better.
I'm assuming the family would be with me so we would have to have defensible shelter, an old mine or cave would be ideal, a 2 story brick building would also be good, an old farmhouse or something like it and preferably surrounded by fields where you can see any possible enemies coming from a distance. As has been said before, either a M4 or AK47 type weapon, .223 and 7.62x39 ammo would be pretty easy to come by. And for close quarters combat nothing beats a 12 Ga pump shotgun loaded with buckshot, with some slugs and bird shot it could do double duty as a food gathering as well as defense arm. I've got 2 Savage pumps, saw off one for a defensive arm and leave the other as a hunting/defense weapon as it is.
I would also have a 380 in a shoulder holster as a backup handgun, and the 44 Mag Redhawk on my right hip.
And remember, in a situation like that it's shoot first and ask questions later. Someone approaches where I'm at and is armed they will be shot at, if they are lucky and smart they will run away as quickly as humanly possible.
Hopefully dropping a weapon and some ammo along the way.
>:-)
Well, I'm not as fearful (or hopeful!) of a coming apocalypse as some of you seem to be. I don't see "forting up" and taking on all comers to be a good longterm survival strategy. What would be better is going to the remote backcountry (somewhere with good water and trees) with my family, and maybe 2 to 3 other families as well. That way we could form a community that is large enough to offer some mutual protection, but small enough to be beneath notice and not overtax the natural resources. Firearms would not be picked with the idea of using them for a "Red Dawn" scenario (we all remember what eventually happened to the Wolverines), but as possible self defense from individuals and small groups who might stumble across our camp and try to take our food and supplies from us, and on a daily basis for getting game.
For that purpose, I would want every family to have 2 guns, a .22LR and a .30-06, both in bolt action. I'd want everyone to have the same guns, for spare parts in case of damage. Since my trusty Remington 514 passed down from my great uncle isn't made anymore, I'd go with a Remington Model Five for the .22. For the .30-06, since I already have a Remington 700 BDL, that's what I'd suggest for everyone else. I'd also want a couple of flintlock muzzleloaders for the group, along with bullet molds, etc. as backup, and maybe a few recurve bows.
I'd also want at least a couple of German Shepherds (pref a male and female so they could breed), which could help alert us to people approaching our settlement.
Beyond that, some axes, saws, shovels, and sheath knives, my copies of "How to Stay Alive in the Woods" by Bradford Angier, "Peterson's Field Guide to Wild Edible Plants" and "Peterson's Field Guid to Medicinal Plants and Herbs."
A couple of gill nets (good for fish and birds), several spools of 15# test and a bunch of small and medium sized hooks.
Also, I'd bring some wire for making snares. Even without that, you can improvise a lot of deadfalls from natural materials. Oh, and I'd bring some seeds, something like pinto beans or lentils, that produces high-protein food that can be stored for long periods.
And actually making blackpowder is quite easy, you don't have to be a PhD chemist to make it. I'm only a masters-degreed chemist and I can do it. Charcoal is easily made, potassium nitrate is a little harder, but still within the realm of MacGyvering in the woods (at least for me, a chemist). Sulfur, you'd have to loot from a defunct drug store (but you could probably pick up premade potassium nitrate along with it)
focusfront
I wouldn't call $2.00 a round for 7.62 X 39 150 GR. JSP,
CHEEP or affordable.
kendix
I have just watched Glenn Beck's show, 19-15-2009. Look at who all is in charge now. I am afraid that unless there is a complete reversal of the political, idealogical, and spiritual direction of the country I and so many others have sworn to defend against all enemies, both foreign and domestic, we may indeed be in for some potential situations referred to in this discussion. It is time for those who remember the times when Americans like our founding fathers were held in high esteem, encourage those who don't, to use the ballot box to repel this onslaught of America-bashing socialism, marxism, and communism while we still have the chance. Otherwise, all this bravado may, unfortunately, be required.
As I live on an Island downstream from a large Metropolitan area, if things were to go to "hell in a handbasket" and need to rely on my own resources (as the constabulary and military undoubtedly would have their hands full), I would have ready my Marlin Model 70 .22LR repeater, my Remington Model 11-87 Semi-auto 12 Guage, my Sporterized Yugo M/47 bolt rifle in 8mm Mauser, my Colt Double Eagle (the Double Action version of a 1911).45 Auto and Beretta 92FS 9mm pistols. My wife can use the .22 Marlin for small game and I can use the 8mm Mauser for harvesting deer. The Remington 11/87 can double as a "riot control" and bird gun and the two handguns are enough to handle most any personal defense situations that should arise. Also plenty of ammunition for everything I mentioned.
Bella I agree a strong community and family is the best starting point.
In this scenario if I was in a situation where I had to grab some weapons and flee for my life I would go for the caliber before the weapon: 12ga.& 30-06 must be the most accessible ammo around the world (7.62x39 should be inserted) so that's my starting point.
Lettering is so small I can't read a word. Try to enlarge back to old style Dave.
I completely agree with Reefmonkey, if you want to eat on at least a semi-regular basis, learn how to trap and snare, learn how to make fish traps etc. Bows and crossbows are great except remember you have limited resources. Arrows and bolts bend and break depending on their material. And, let's face it, eventually they will all get lost. You can learn how to make bows, arrows, and the seemingly simple atlatl-- a great ancient weapon that central american tribes used for hunting and as a weapon--went right through spanish breastplates! I believe everyone should own a good 22 rifle--for hunting, target practice,TEACHING others especially children good shooting fundementals and safety, and economically, its the most efficient. I would tend to go heavier in weight than most people if I did NOT have to pack it. The more accurate the better. I really like the Thompson Center 22's. They are ALL steel and VERY accurate. Yes, they tend to hold value even when bought used {ie, more expensive} but super accurate and reliable. One gun writer wrote that this is what the 10/22 should have been in the first place--before you drop the $200-$300 in it. Choice of 308 or 30/06 is probably obvious, and is on personal preference. Semi-auto is more fire power and less felt recoil, but you will also go through ammo faster, and with heavier ammo, you carry less. Bolt guns are more accurate in most cases, but slower in operation especially in stress. I'll buy one of each in the same calibre. Shotguns in 12 or 20 gauge depending on your size and experience. At close quarters, the shotgun is king. Most thugs hit with buckshot from either on, won't be able to notice the gauge before they croke. 12 carries more pellets in a heavier load but you pay for it in recoil. Again semi-autos have less felt recoil but pump actions are almost as fast in action and shrug off dirt and sand should it get in the action. Mossberg milspec 590 or an 870 are best in current pumps. Mixed reviews in my experience with Ithacas although I haven't shot the latest ones made in Ohio, I've heard good reviews on them. The 870 has been around forever, and has a proven combat record by the police and military. Should in the unlikely event it has a broken part, parts are easily available and any gunsmith can fix it if you can't figure it out. I'd get one in used good condition to save money for the previous reasons and out fit it for tactical use. I guess I'm most familiar with the 870 as it was my TO weapon in the service and I spent many lonely nights with one cradled in my arms---but thats -er- a different blog. Logistically you're carrying less shells for the bang due to size and weight. Mossbergs and Remingtons are the 10/22's of the shotgun world with a ton of aftermarket parts. For a pistol, I wouldn't carry anything in a calibre that didn't begin with the number "4." Most pistol calibres just don't have the traumatic shock of rifles, so you are going for blood loss (the bigger the bullet-the bigger the hole) and accuracy/bullet placement -head,heart/lungs,crotch--yes crotch, I've seen it end gun fights rather quickly, its great for constrained areas--aisle on a bus or train-- its pretty easy to hit on the draw, causes a bent-over reflex, and sets them up for the other two shots-- crotch shot on draw/ he bends over /two to the back of the head/game over. I've read some say how available the 9mm is, but most police have gone FROM the 9mm to 40 sw or 45 acp. A couple months ago you couldn't find 9mm, but I was buying 40 sw ON SALE! SIG Sauer, Glock, H&K, any of the mainstream 1911 companies are good choices. Again look for good conditioned used esp. in SIG,Glock and HK, they can probably shoot better than most people can hold them, and are durable enough to pass to your grandchildren. I usually buy pistols and revolvers full to mid size, as the ultra compacts have more felt recoil-think double tapping and follow up shots, are generally less accurate, loses the velocity of all that high priced defensive ammo you bought, and can get quirky with high velocity defensive ammo-due to the lower mass of the gun and higher recoil impulse,the rounds can move in the magazine, and can even cause the bullet to back into the shell case. This can produce jams and can also cause higher than normal case pressures.This is what happens sometimes when you are shooting regular ball ammo in practice, buy some hot +p ammo for defense that you would think would shoot better-it doesn't-then wonderif someone switched pistols on you. Plus if you have a big heavy pistol, you can crack him in the mellon if you run out of ammo. Lastly, I would get a good AR 15.I would go with a national match model-better sights,better trigger, better barrel, free floated, better fitted (more reliable). Clapsed stocks and re dots are ok up to about 200 yards, but then you target starts to be getting the same size as the dot and you start needing a better cheek weld to improve accuracy. I would go with the regular stocks, an A4 flattop folding back up sights, a good 1-5x20 or 30 mm scope (both eyes open at close quarters but enough magnification to go 600+ meters, tactical rings with picatinny tops to mount an ultra compact reddot for close quarters( burris fastfire2 or the similar trijicon) for say 0 to 75 meters. Regular 223is okay since as civilians we don't have the same constraints as the military, so we can shoot every thing from Varmint Grenade-think minimal ricochette but nasty wound-to the heavy long range stuff like Sierra Matchkings. Several good knives folding and fixed, several good big knives-TOPS Armeggedon and/or Cold Steel Trailmaster, tomahawk -I go back and forth between the Viet Nam models and the traditional-so I better get both, good compasses Silvas are simpler than lensatics but lensatics are more durable, good water filters with backups, meds and first aid, freezed dried bulk foods if I had the money or canned meats, brown rice, dried beans, dried fruits on the cheap, solar panels for basic electric and to charge deep cell batteries, rechargeable batteries for flashlights and walkie-talkies. But by far, the most important single thing for my survival would be....TO GET TO THE MAIL BOX BEFORE THE WIFE TO GET THE CREDIT CARD STATEMENT.
Someone needs to reach out with that .30 cal and touch the monkey on my back!!! SGAREDNECK is right!!!
Wow. I have been trolling threads for a long time and I have never, ever come across as much BS as this thread has in it. There is one person up there that has a little sense built into him and that is squaredneck.
Now, I am as much of a gun luvin', survivin' guy as the next, but what are these mobs that people keep talking about? Are there zombies that I should be worried about??
Have we, the readers of F&S, turned into a huge militia group? When in the history of the U.S. have there been any roaming mobs ready to take down your food supplies??
Sure is going to get lonley in the small towns with every single one of you "headin to the hills" in the event of any trouble. I'll be safe and warm in my house while you're in a tent trying to get by, while dodging the Russians while screaming WOLVERINES!!!
I agree with squaredneck. Rid yourself of the debt, be sensible and you'll be fine in the event of any unsettling times.
You all sound like 11 year old kids out camping after watching "Red Dawn".
Although by this point you probably aren't interested in my "choices" for zombie killin guns, but here are my choices for
1. Home defense: Modified Mossberg 500. Why a shotgun and not an AR-15? Well, you should know that, you're F&S readers afterall. There are LOTS of reasons. LOTS.
2. Food procurement: .308/30.06 Simple. Why? Availability of ammo. Versatility, etc.... Who needs a .338 RUM to, as you so eloquently put it, "Reach out and touch someone"?? Please. If a human is THAT far away and posing a threat they are most likely shooting BACK AT YOU.
3. Food procurement cont.: I have no arguments with the 10/22. A perfect rifle to have with you. Cheap, easy to use. Cheap, available ammo. Good choice.
4. I'll assume, since you are F&S readers that you are familiar with your OWN pistols. Why limit yourself to one particular model??? A 1911 in .45. Why? I cannot see a good reason as to why it cannot be a Glock in .45. I agree that having a pistol in your mini, zombie-killin arsenal is a good idea. The requirements for it to be a 1911 are absolutely ridiculous. I'll take my Glock.
Flyer22,
I truly appreciate the comments you made there. I am not that smart, it's just that after all of the SHTF talk I heard around here(locally), I sat down one night and I got out my notepad, and tried to get my personal priorities down in order of importance. The "Red Dawn" scenario is probably far fetched, but it makes for a good story(I have heard that someone is actually working on a remake of the movie as we speak). That plays to our patriotism, our inner-John Wayne, or whoever your hero may be this week.
The having a stack of guns and ammo is credible, but what good is it if your house is on the verge of foreclosure? The 'I'm gonna hole up in the hills' thing is going to work for some folks better than others. I would think that if a catastrophic event(or series of them) happened, what you would see would be
some chaos in some metro areas (i.e. New Orleans post-Katrina) and you would see relative calm(backed by vigilance) in more rural areas. I had work in the Gulf Coast region right after Katrina, and I can tell you firsthand that I saw folks for the most part sticking together in Mississippi where I was at. Things were as bad as I have ever seen them, but the people I were around were not hopeless. I think that came from an inner sense of self-reliance mixed with a willingness to work with others. I think that point has been touched on here through all the talk of what .50 cal. sniper rifle is the best.
Be of good character, try to pick good friends. Put yourself, family, friends in a position where you are not heavily dependent on others. Be willing to help others. Don't be too proud to be helped. The ways to be independent should be self-evident. You do need to be armed. You also need to have water, food, shelter, meds, and all the essential things thought about.
Moral: Living your life is going on right now and will tomorrow too. Get and be prepared, but don't be blinded by SHTF and such. Take time to personally evaluate what real position you are in.
p.s. Bella, I often disagree with you, but without your unique take on things it would be a lot less colorful here. I disagree on the 1911, but only for my own self. If the Glock works for you that is the one to have. I love the idea of the cannon and mortar. When was the last time you heard of someone who owned yard artillery having problems with zombies? NEVER.
S GA redneck
Well said. I detest snobs.
870,Marlin 366, S&W 686 Plus, Claymores if I can find a source.
Add a 1911, since I already have one of everything but claymores
im going with my
AR-15 223
Remington 1100 12ga tactical
Glock 22 40 cal
and Ruger 10/22
David, instead of a Model 1911 (any make) in .45 ACP? what do you think of the FN Five-seveN®; 20 roung mag pluss 1 in the chamber 40 grain 224diam, at 2200fps ?
The best plan is have to win the first battle then strip your enemy of what they have. More than likely it will be 223, 308 (M60) and 9mm
You guys are a bunch of loons.the recession is over. where going to have cheap heathcare reform,Global warming has ended,we have peace hence nobel. haha i cant do it anymore we are doomed.When all hell breaks loose all the polititions will flee to europe
AlaskanExile
David’s 225-grain Barnes TSX bullet at 2,750fps load out of his 338 RUM I can easily duplicate with my 338 Win Mag. Line them up and knock them down with one shot!
I’m pushing a 225 grain Hornady right at 3000fps
The FN Five-seven is no punk!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FN_Five-seven
AlaskanExile
Hard feelings about what? I’m from the “Old School” of shooting and everyone including the Honorable David Petzal I do have the utmost respect in, PERIOD! Yes we will disagree with one another but what the heck! As for the Barnes bullets, there isn’t anything around I need that kind of projectile for. My 338 is sighted in at 225 yards with Hornady 225 grain and Nosler 250 grain Partitions shoot dead on at 100 yards. The distance on 9 power on my Leupold from the center cross hair where it meet the thick crosshair at 100 yards is approximately 4 inches. So if I’m using my 250’s either I hold dead on at 100 or use the lower crosshair as a post sight. As you can probably see now, I do things deferent for what I have worked up and combined what works best.
But I do have to admit, those Barnes would be HELL in warfare, just short of a armor piercing bullet! My 225’s will penetrate 1” plate at 100 yards and don’t anyone dare try it! We had a rifle test rest with the ability of shooting the rifle remote and when the bullet didn’t pass thru the plate it would zing right over our heads!
1. MOSSBERG 590A1 shotgun
2. xmd springfield and armory 9mm handgun 19+1.
3. SPRINGFIELD AND ARMORY M14 308 round SOCOM Edition
4. 10/22 ruger modified with a 30 round mag clip
5. Colt AR-15 M4 .223
6. 2000 rounds of each.
7. Spotting scope
8. Dont forget your Jeep wrangler on 35inch Super Swampers,hunting chair and BEER hah!
I could swear I only hit that button once.
Flame Thrower so the game I shot would be ready to eat.
It will never get that bad, because we won't let it, but I'd bring what's in the safe:
Savage Model 1Y single-shot(for use by me and the kids)
New England .410 bore single-shot (for the kids)
Savage .30-06
Berreta 390 12ga
Ruger SP101 .357 (with .38 ammo for wife)
M1911A1 made by Remington Rand in 1943 (for good luck, because it survived the last end of the world)
Just another thought, and I read it somewhere else: if you are truly in survival mode, it wouldn't hurt to have a mouse trap or two around. They don't take up much space, and they work. Just a thought.
You know one thing that would be nice in the scenario being discussed?
No internet; and endless circular discussion from know -it-alls and proselytizers. (Is that even a word?)
I get the feeling that SOME of us will be disappointed if society somehow avoids the whole "damnation alley" scene.
I gotta go find a new tinfoil Stetson.
Hehe, just had another thought, if we are holing up the best thing to do would be to have a weapon in every popular caliber, rifle, shotgun and pistol. Sure if it hits the fan and there are armed battles (assuming you survive them) you will probably be able to collect quite a few weapons and ammo, one thing I've always thought was stupid in movies, a guy with a club or knife manages to take out a guy with a gun, but doesn't pick up his gun and all the ammo he was carrying?
What was he thinking??????
GRAB ALL YOU CAN CARRY WHENEVER YOU CAN! That would apply to weapons, ammo, food, water, matches, fuel, whatever. If it gets so bad that there is wide scale rioting and looting just to survive it's every man for himself.
And another thing you need to do to prepare is talk to your friends and hopefully shooting and hunting buddies and arrange a plan for a worst case scenario ahead of time, so you can know who to trust if it happens, a group of families banding together has a better chance than one person.
If you want to have a reasonable idea of what might happen if we shoud experience a civilization threatening eventI suggest you read the book "Alas Babylon".It was writen quite a few years ago (perhaps the 50's or 60's)about the events that ocurr after world war 3. I forget the author but perhaps his first name was Pat. Of course it's fiction but not too bad a yarn.Youcan read it in an hour. It's food for thought, could even give you an idea or two. Otherwise, carry on.
If you want to have a reasonable idea of what might happen if we shoud experience a civilization threatening eventI suggest you read the book "Alas Babylon".It was writen quite a few years ago (perhaps the 50's or 60's)about the events that ocurr after world war 3. I forget the author but perhaps his first name was Pat. Of course it's fiction but not too bad a yarn.Youcan read it in an hour. It's food for thought, could even give you an idea or two. Otherwise, carry on.
My remington 870, obviously,
another 870 SPS SuperSlug, a Marlin 1895 lever action shotgun, and a H&K USP, or maybe M500 pistolgrip with extended magazine. (You can tell I like shotguns)
There is sense in my shotgun obsession. The 870 obvious. The SPS would be great for long range. Saw off the stock on the Marlin and you have some Terminator related awesomnes. And you always need a good .45.
The deal is I'm not fan of snobs of any kind. If the buckskin crowd were honest they'd admit that any well made traditional sidelock cap n ball rifle can shoot as well as any in-line muzzleloader. The objections are all hype. And if the buckskin crowd weren't hypocrites, then while they're turning up their noses at the in-lines for not being properly ancient in design (by the way, the first IN-LINE muzzleloader was made in the 1830s), they'd make sure that they don't use a quad, a gps, a gas lantern, an electronic watch, a cell phone, a USGS 7.5 minute map, a credit card, or any fabric for any purpose not made out of cotton or wool during the entirety of their hunt. Otherwise they're just faking "tradition."
anyone actually read the book?
Next Issue: Predict the end of the United States, using the Solunar tables!
3 Remington 870 Wingmasters. With rifled and smooth bore barrels.
As many shells and slugs as I can find.
A Bolt Action 30.06 with as many shells as I can find.
3 870's provide 2 shotguns with 1 used for parts to keep the other two going.
30.06 for larger game like moose, elk, deer, and zombie's.
Anyone remember the NY riots back in the 60's?
LA riots just a few years ago?
People can get real ugly real fast given the right circumstances, And it usually seems to be city folks who start the $h*t!
It's a big part of why I live in the hick town (calling it a town is a stretch for the group of houses round here) and not in a big town or city.
I can walk out back and find deer, rabbit and squirrel to eat if needed, and as been mentioned trapping is one thing we all should learn to do, sure hunting is more fun for recreation but in survival situations you need to be able to trap game. Much more efficient way to gather food!
I hope it never gets to that, but we should be prepared for the worst as best we can be.
I live in the middle of nowhere, on good black gardening soil with several free-flowing wells, so I'm not going anywhere. However, if everything really went pear shaped and I had to leave...
1) a centerfire rifle
--hmmm... looking at the gun rack I think I'd take
a Winchester 88, mostly because it's the only
one I have with sights, just in case something
happens to the scope. It's a .243; .308 might be
better. Oh well.
2) a .22 pistol
--I have an early Ruger automatic that would work,
I guess. It's a rabbit killer, and I actually do
own a holster for it. I don't own many holsters.
3) a 12 gauge shotgun, sawed-off
--It would pain me greatly, but I think I would
chop up this cherry 1906 Ithaca side by side I
picked up at an auction. Pistols are fine, but
you just never know when you need to go all Mad
Max on someone.
4) ??????
--That's enough to carry. However, since I have
one choice left for the thought experiment, I'll
add the one gun list: a .22 rifle. In that
scenario I think I'd take a Marlin 39A. I'd be
pretty comfortable in the post-apocolyptic world
with a golden boy in tow.
Having a complete survival kit with food, water, first aid, medications, camping supplies, tools, fuel, etc...is very smart.
And along with your kit, a full array of weapons for protection, hunting, etc... are necessary. My personal choices are Mossberg 500 8 shot, Stainless Mini 14 w/20 mags, Stainless Ruger 10/22 w/20 mags, Sako 3006 w/3x9, Sig P220 45 ACP w/10 mags. Guns are important, but ammo will be king! It will be worth much more than $$. I store approx. 75,000 assorted rounds. All in easy to move/locked ammo cans. I also have a 70lb compound bow, 177 cal Gamo pellet rifle and a even sling shot (Don't laugh! I've killed many rabbits and squirrels with it and if necessary at 25 ft, I would have a pretty good chance of putting a dent in someone's head". I also have a reloader for center fire and 12 gauge. Along with the reloader I have approx 5 lbs powder that can also be used for explosives if needed. However the most important item I have are written PLANS! Written steps and plans for "what to do" in different scenarios. If we stay home there's a plan covering everything from security to scavaging. If we need to leave area, theres a separate plan for that to. It covers vehicle prep, detailed list of items to take, specific destinations, routes, communication with family, etc... When an emergency happens, it's not necessarily the items you have but what you do with them that will determine you and your families chances for survival. Stay calm, expect the unexpected and be prepared to act quickly and without hesitation.
Rice Farm, not really, What I would like to see was suggested by Tom Clancy in "Debt of Honor" and "Executive Orders" And "Without Remorse" but unfortunately Jack Ryan is fictional.
Vince Flynn is also full of good ideas, as Was John Ross when he Wrote "Unintended Consequences", but none of any of this is likely to happen.
Bolt action .223(most common ammo)
PUR Hiker Water filter
accurate .22 rifle
Diamond bow
I really don't plan on an apocalypse but its the last excuse I have to to buy more "toys"
Hey Gunslinger you want the print bigger?
If your running internet explorer, go up to the tool bar where it says view. click on view,then scrowl down to where it says zoom and a sub menu will pop out, scrowl to say 125% click on that and the print will be larger.
My cannons are my treasures, I figure I could take out a truck with the 27mm, it fires a 4 ounce ball. The Mortar would be best used as a mortar, it could be very handy to be able to put smoke bombs down range. Wanna spoil that hidden snipers aim? Smoke bomb! Tom Robbins wrote about the "Batsh-t and Frootloops" smoke bomb in "Still Life with Woodpeckers" (a fine work of entertaining fiction).
Still anybody with access to the makings for a potato cannon has light artillery. If it will throw a potato the length of a football field, it would as likely throw something else of similar weight and caliber. Potato cannons hit HARD. PVC pipe is cheap.
In the real "Mad Max" kind of scenario I think a simple break-at-the-breach 12 gauge shotgun with GaugeMate adapters would allow you to use almost any shotshells you manage to aquire in one gun. I have tested the 12-20 and the 12-.410 adapters (I didn't see any point in the 12-16 or the 12-28 gauge adapters), the ones I tried out gave good patterns. I don't see any sense in storing ammo that doesn't fit your arms, but if rounds get scarce it might be handy to use whatever one can scrounge. Shotshells can often be reloaded as long as one has powder, primers and shot. I always wanted to get to play with some fletchettes, I've only seen videos of what they can do to a target, Ohhh science.
Then there is the humble fougass...'nuff said.
I have always maintained that any intelligent bodger who ever watched an episode or two of "McGyver" ought to be able to figure out surprises enough, just by misusing todays technology...
I liked the guy who brought up spears, no weapon ever created ever became "obsolete". The weapon that kills the most people every year around the globe is still the Machete (panga, barong etc.)More folks get hacked down with big knives than get shot with AK's. Spears still work too. Don't forget, a rock is still lethal in most hands. It is always better to make friends than try to kill one another, but if folks are hostile and unco-operative then sometimes you have to hurt them. Anything goes then, as long as you can dominate that mad minute and not loose control. Going berserk and overdoing it is very bad. Indeed it is actually the only thing I've ever been in trouble for!
Sooooo, in the "Glock vs 1911" argument:
How many rounds are you going to have with you?
How many zombies are you planning on shooting, 10,000??
You have THREE other guns.
The argument about 1911 vs Glock is a mute point.
That is pronounced "moot" for those of you who don't know.
This is fascinating. Having a muzzleloader is a great idea, but I'm curious how many of the folks here know how to use a muzzleloader. I mean a real one, not one of those inline, Pyrodex pellet machines. And while it does make sense to have a flintlock under the theory that you'll run out of caps, you're still going to need powder.
My dream survival fortress is the basement of the couple in Tremors (the wife was played by Reba McIntyre).
"Weirdos" and "pretenders?" What's the deal, Diehl?
You guys need to get off the blog and go hunting or shooting! The BS is getting a bit deep.
Remington 870 12 ga pump if I could have only one gun this would be it.
Remington 700 30-06 so many bullets everywhere.
Ruger 10/22 mainly for food and bullets are cheap and everywhere.
In all truth if you are going full scale war you need a fully automatic .223. Parts are readily available.
buckets of 22 lr, 204 ruger, 223, 270, 30-30, 308, 338 win mag, 45-70, 12 ga and my favs in 9 mm and 40 s&w and the tools to use them all, scope all you can afford, buy some night optics too. keep some xbows too .... and reload :)
just a hunting story here too .... wife complains that all the cute deer and tasty turkeys seem to be gone from the farm .. and we see very few deer around our place ... but lots of coyotes. so - out with the 204 ruger last sunday morning at 5:30 am to get set up at the edge of my big forest - gonna call em out with a mouse squeak :) ... well, i took 30 steps out my door and two run past me in the dark - one big one and one smaller one .. RIGHT AT MY HOUSE FOR CRYIN OUT LOUD. I stop frozen thinking WTF! they saw me arounf the corner of the house and are long gone ... so i sit down on the lawn on the hillside .. as the sun comes up a bit i start to scope the field - still sitting beside my house .. and there i can see 4 deer in the field about 250 yards from the house out toward he front gate. The deer are grazing and i scan back toward the forest looking for coyotes thinking i should just head back in the go back to sleep as i have been spotted and feel like trying another day. the sun is coming up higher and i am still thinking about quitting but decide to take a last look at the three deer (remember i and the wife have not seen many). Well, they are now about 400 yards away but through the scope i now see the "deer" were in fact three other coyotes that had been grazing for mice with their heads down LOL. i ordered a night scope so next time i can see better :) some of you should appreciate i would not shoot what i could not really see.
While most people (myself included) have approached this question by giving their dream list of what they would want by their side with little thought about weight, bulk, or issues of transporting all this stuff (especially if they found themselves hiking to somewhere remote), some people have posted such concerns that a huge arsenal would not be practical if you were on the run. I am surprised that none of the latter group has recommended something like an AR-7 survival rifle or the civilian version of the M6 Aircrew Survival Weapon.
Both weapons are light and compact, as they were designed for the Air Force, to give a downed airman a survival weapon for getting game and some self-defense.
The AR-7 is a semiautomatic firing .22 LR. It usually comes with an 8 round magazine, but larger magazines can be purchased. The rifle weighs a scant 2.5 pounds. It breaks down into 4 pieces (barrel, magazine, stock, and action), with the action, magazine and the barrel storing inside the stock, which floats in water. Fully assembled, it is 35 inches long; broken down with components stored in the butt it is 17 inches long. Light and compact, easy to slip into a backpack, this would be my number one choice for an ultralite "head for the hills in a hurry" escape.
The M6 is a superimposed "over-under" survival rifle, with an 18 inch overall barrel. The top barrel fires a .22 hornet, bottom barrel fires a .410 shotgun shell.
Advantages of the M6 are that the more powerful .22 Hornet can take a larger variety of game and be better for self-defence than .22 LR of the AR-7. The .410 as well, would give more flexibility when going for game or for defense. Disadvantages compared to the AR-7 would be that the M6 is less compact, and its single-shot design versus the AR-7's semiauto capacity. Since I, personally don't consider a .410 all that useful, nor do I consider the .22 hornet THAT much more versatile for general survival shooting, I would want the AR-7's compactness, rapid fire, and ease in finding .22 LR ammunition.
Well it's been almost a year now, and not much has happened . The Protests and town hall meeting's have had and will continue to have positive effects several of the worst politicians in D. C. have either announced impending retirement's or are unlikely to be reelected. They are having problems trying to pass much of the crap they have in mind. I do feel a lot better than I did before. But the thing to do between now and the primary elections is to either RUN FOR OFFICE (I intend too)or pay attention to who does!!!!!!!!!!!
All I need in the "coming collapse" is toilet paper, duct tape, and a 12 guage.
give me a M-16A3 with a scope a backpack a .22 rimfire and glock-18c in .45 acp and i'll be fine
I would have to go with this:
#12 gauge pump with 18 1/2 in. barrel and cylinder choke
#lever action 30-30 with a 20 in. barrel, peep sights and a good sling
#a good 22 with good iron sights
#a high quality combat 1911 45 acp
Seriously, if it all did collapse, I would be stuck with the guns I already have. Benelli autoloader, 30.06 bolt action, and a 9mm would be it.
First issue is to get to a place where water is plentiful. If you can get by fishing, then that takes care of running out of game to hunt. Ideally, I'd get myself some horses and round up some cattle wherever I could get them. That takes care of having to hunt. Also would enter into some of the high-fenced game places too if I had to. For small game, I would work on catching a falcon and training it to catch birds and squirrels... that takes the ammo issue out for the .22.
If you're facing a military threat, I would pick some off from long range and then take the weapons they'd be using. The more you kill, the more ammo you can get back. I know thats video game logic, but it would have to work when your supply of your own goes out.
Seriously, if it all did collapse, I would be stuck with the guns I already have. Benelli autoloader, 30.06 bolt action, and a 9mm would be it.
First issue is to get to a place where water is plentiful. If you can get by fishing, then that takes care of running out of game to hunt. Ideally, I'd get myself some horses and round up some cattle wherever I could get them. That takes care of having to hunt. Also would enter into some of the high-fenced game places too if I had to. For small game, I would work on catching a falcon and training it to catch birds and squirrels... that takes the ammo issue out for the .22.
If you're facing a military threat, I would pick some off from long range and then take the weapons they'd be using. The more you kill, the more ammo you can get back. I know thats video game logic, but it would have to work when your supply of your own goes out.
Post a Comment