Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Herring: What Makes U.S. Hunters Different?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Conservationist
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

August 25, 2010

Herring: What Makes U.S. Hunters Different?

By Hal Herring

In the July 26th issue of the New Yorker magazine, there is an excellent story by novelist Jonathan Franzen called “Emptying the Skies” about illegal songbird market hunting and trapping in the Mediterranean nation of Cyprus. Franzen, who is apparently as effective a journalist as he is a fiction-writer, accompanies a group called the Committee Against Bird Slaughter (CABS) as they try to free warblers and flycatchers and other species from “lime sticks,” a trap made from a long switch coated in sticky sap that bird poachers place in orchards and anywhere that birds gather. The poachers’ goal: a bagful of songbirds for sale to restaurants and markets for pickling or to make ambelopoulia, a platter of fried little birds that has been a traditional delicacy in the Mediterranean since the 16th century. One restaurant owner in the story who serves the illegal ambelopoulia likens the dish to natural Viagra, of course. (Rhinos being hard to come by on the Mediterranean, fried-up little birds must suffice.) The result: what was once a traditional rural delicacy is now a booming underground business catering to more affluent Cypriots and tourists, and the bird populations are going down fast. Law enforcement seems uninterested.

Franzen also visits the nation of Malta, where it is estimated that about 12,000 people hunt songbirds for food and sport and mounts (there is plenty of illegal trapping, too, according to the story). Malta is in the middle of a major migration path for European songbirds, so millions of them have to pass through every spring, which is when the majority of hunting traditionally has taken place. Not surprisingly, killing so many songbirds on the way to their breeding grounds means that there are a lot fewer birds these days, not just in Malta, but in the countries where the birds spend the other seasons. The fight is on, between the legitimate- or at least licensed- hunters and the anti-hunters from Malta and from all across the European Union. Meanwhile, most in the story agree, the illegal shooters and trappers are hard at work, spring, summer and fall, with enforcement of the laws protecting the birds as lax as ever. The hunters interviewed seemed unable to set aside their differences with the anti-hunters (maybe that would be impossible), even though both want there to be more birds, and more protection. Both groups seem unable to get law enforcement to actually enforce the laws protecting the birds that remain. It’s a Mexican standoff- or in this case a Maltese one. There’s not much discussion of habitat in it, either.

But as I read the story, I kept on thinking- why has the US been so different than this? Why have our hunters been the driving force behind conservation and preservation of habitat for almost 100 years (whether our own antis want to admit it or not)? We whacked out the passenger pigeon, decimated (at least, since decimation means killing one in ten) the plovers, curlews, etc. Almost polished off the buffalo and the grizz. But we brought them back, and made sure that they had habitat. We paid for the National Wildlife Refuge System with Duck Stamp money, and so on (and on, and on). We Americans seem to feel an obligation to the animals that we hunt- that if you are not in some way making sure it goes on, you don’t feel right about taking them. There’s nothing in Franzen’s story to suggest that the Cypriots or the Maltese hunters or the poachers feel any similar obligation.

What makes us different? I have my own ideas, but I’d like to hear what F&S readers think.

Comments (20)

Top Rated
All Comments
from tpbesone wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

I'm not sure of the hunting tradition in these other countries but I think that has a lot to do with why the U.S. hasn't had these issues. Hunting is about getting out in the wild with friends and I think many hunters enjoy the hunt as much if not more than killing animals for food. There also hasn't been a high demand for wild game in the U.S. and the wild game that is for sale is typically from farms. Also, ethical hunters know that the only way to keep enjoying our sport is to support the maintance and growth of game populations.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

I don't believe the Maltesse or Cypriots are "hunters" at all, so I don't see a basis for comparison. They're greedy capitalists, nothing more. The comparison could much easier be made between them and the fat cats on wallstreet. Out to make a quick buck, no regard for those left in the wake of their behaviour. We hunt as a passion, as a passtime, as a hobby, as a tradition. We don't sell our meat, we feed our family with it, or donate it to those in need. These 'poachers' aren't 'hunting' at all, they're using traps and glue-sticks to kill the most game that they can, so that they can make the most money that they can.
I'm pretty thick skinned, so I'm not "INSULTED" that you even compare 'us' to 'them" , but it is a bit rediculous. Makes for good discussion though.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from dukkillr wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Uh, cause we're Americans, and they're losahs. This is basic, guys.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from philbourjaily wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Hal --
We enforced our ban on the sale of wild game. Our market hunters were very destructive to wildlife when game could be sold.

On another note, I am glad to see someone besides me still knows what "decimate" really means.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Yes, we made a point to enforce our laws, but why do we feel dedicated to those laws protecting wildlife when them forins could give a hoot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

My last and only experience shooting songbirds was at the age of six, and resulted in a whipping and the confiscation of my Red Ryder BB gun by my Father.

It is my understanding most European hunting is done on private land only by people who can afford it. Here in the States we all still have a stake in the game and can hunt on public lands and most of us want to protect our resources. Hopefully frown on poaching.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Sounds like a big part of it is the market, and societal acceptance of market hunting.

Maybe also because we have so much public land with licenses so cheap and big game plentiful.

Maybe too the way this place is set up. Even if we disagree with a law we still follow it. Social contract.

Those Cypriots need some wildlife biologists to suggest laws then they need to follow them.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

They will be sorry when all the birds are gone. I pity the fools. Market hunting has never worked out long term. The unregulated are fishing out the oceans as well. Mankind has devised more efficient methods of harvest, so without enforced regulation, species are doomed. Speaking of songbirds, does anyone have a clue as to how many are killed in this country alone by house cats?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steward wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

We are a society born of liberty. People often think of liberty as just freedom. It isn't Liberty is freedom with responsibility. You mess up, you pay the price. So perhaps the answer to your question is that responsibility accompanies liberty, and since we are a land of liberty, we have shown a higher level of responsibility in our land- and animal- management.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Anyone wanna explain what the problem with Steward's post is? There have been a lot of rampant minus votes for no reason lately. If you take issue, be a man and say so.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from thedraketaker wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

we're all just roothless killers, admit it. we dont hunt, we put a pile of corn out and shoot whatever decides to eat it that day, its not a sport, or an act of nature, just us as humans tryin to show our dominance over an animal...and believe me, i take full advantage of it....hunters...were just sitters...sittin there waitin on somethin to pass by or walk out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

draketaker, I just read through all of your comments so far. Go back to your bottle and leave us alone.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve Marlin wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

As a kid, my dad used to tell me about when he served in Europe in the late 50's, he could always tell who was an American driver - the American driver actually "stopped" at the stop sign. His point - Americans believe the rule of law.

Go figure - our nations wildlife is better for it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve Marlin wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

I don't hunt over corn, does that makes me more or less blood thristy?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 1 year 22 weeks ago

We seem to be hunting the wrong game. We need an open seasom on spammers. I kinda like the word decimate but eradicate would seem to fit better for them.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Coachcl wrote 1 year 22 weeks ago

You hit it on the head. We want to make sure we can keep up with our passion. We want to make sure there are animals to hunt and that they can grow in great environments. Other nations aren't looking at that. They just want to make a quick buck. We are doing what we can to help with the conservation. Thats the important thing.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ohiodeerhunter wrote 1 year 22 weeks ago

Market hunting about killed off all the bison,the market
hunters in Fla killed off a lot of birds just for their feathers,if they keep it up over in Cyprus,they will kill all the birds off there,then wonder why there are none left.
Here,we have learned that species need to be managed,and the population kept at or above a certain level so that we can hunt,and then when our children start hunting,there will be game left for them to hunt.
We observe the hunting seasons here,don't take game when the animals have just had their fawns,or whatever for each species,so that the young animals get the chance to survive until they are older. Remember how many states had antler size rules? or the old point system for ducks?
We followed the rules,now we still have game to hunt,and so will future generations.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

As I preach in my Hunter Ed classes Ethics and Respect for wildlife seperates our hunters from all others. I think that this is a prime example. We as Americans most of the time respect the law and abide by it and see the need for the law. You will always have a few who won't but now the ethical hunters will for the most part point our to law enforcement the ones who cannot abide by the law. I think this is what seperates American people from the rest of the world. I won't use the word hunters because these people aren't hunters.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dtownley wrote 1 year 19 weeks ago

At this time in our history we control most of our hunting destiny and pay a pretty good sum. Our elected officials still value their job, watch their P's & Q's and our voting block elects them or not. We are the economy for a lot of areas were there is no industry and our rural counterparts value our return each year. I think sportsman come from all over the world, the bottom line is, are they afforded the opportunity to be able to shine as sportsman ? There is no place as vast in the world as the U.S.A., in open to the public hunting opportunity. Hunters are from every country, therefore, sportsman are from every country(yes poachers also ). WHEN UG's ROCK THROWING RESULTED IN DINNER HE ATE, WHEN HE THREW TO MUCH AND DID TO WELL IT RESULTED IN DINNER AND STINK'IN RANCID BREAKFAST. UG FIGURED OUT WHEN TO STOP THROWING and a sportsman was born. OPPORTUNITY = DIFFERENCE

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Lawrence Schwab wrote 1 year 18 weeks ago

What makes Hunters in the united states fill responsible to preserve and nurture are wildlife its natural habitat ? This is a good question and I enjoyed the article above asking this. I think it quite simple with a little thinking and knowledge of are history. In America we did once hunt a lot of are wildlife close to the brink of no extension . When are ancestors the settlers and frontiersmen first moved here we depended heavily on wild life not only for food and clothing for us to survive, but to make money as well. Then this funny thing happened, trapping and finding game became harder and we started to realize that if we want to use our wild life, our natural resources we must take care of them and give back. Kind of sounds like the native Americans had it right after all? however Once we as a group started to realize this Laws begin to be passed such as an law established in 1896 in a court case called gear vs Connecticut were the supreme court decided that wildlife should belong to the people of the united states, and that each stat shall establish laws to preserve and manage its wildlife. This became a big step in our history of conservation and established that hunting is a privilege not a right .Hunters, outdoorsmen and fishermen begin to teach these lesions to there sons and daughters and it become apart of our teachings and our hunting and fishing heritage.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from jbird wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

I don't believe the Maltesse or Cypriots are "hunters" at all, so I don't see a basis for comparison. They're greedy capitalists, nothing more. The comparison could much easier be made between them and the fat cats on wallstreet. Out to make a quick buck, no regard for those left in the wake of their behaviour. We hunt as a passion, as a passtime, as a hobby, as a tradition. We don't sell our meat, we feed our family with it, or donate it to those in need. These 'poachers' aren't 'hunting' at all, they're using traps and glue-sticks to kill the most game that they can, so that they can make the most money that they can.
I'm pretty thick skinned, so I'm not "INSULTED" that you even compare 'us' to 'them" , but it is a bit rediculous. Makes for good discussion though.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from philbourjaily wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Hal --
We enforced our ban on the sale of wild game. Our market hunters were very destructive to wildlife when game could be sold.

On another note, I am glad to see someone besides me still knows what "decimate" really means.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Lawrence Schwab wrote 1 year 18 weeks ago

What makes Hunters in the united states fill responsible to preserve and nurture are wildlife its natural habitat ? This is a good question and I enjoyed the article above asking this. I think it quite simple with a little thinking and knowledge of are history. In America we did once hunt a lot of are wildlife close to the brink of no extension . When are ancestors the settlers and frontiersmen first moved here we depended heavily on wild life not only for food and clothing for us to survive, but to make money as well. Then this funny thing happened, trapping and finding game became harder and we started to realize that if we want to use our wild life, our natural resources we must take care of them and give back. Kind of sounds like the native Americans had it right after all? however Once we as a group started to realize this Laws begin to be passed such as an law established in 1896 in a court case called gear vs Connecticut were the supreme court decided that wildlife should belong to the people of the united states, and that each stat shall establish laws to preserve and manage its wildlife. This became a big step in our history of conservation and established that hunting is a privilege not a right .Hunters, outdoorsmen and fishermen begin to teach these lesions to there sons and daughters and it become apart of our teachings and our hunting and fishing heritage.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from tpbesone wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

I'm not sure of the hunting tradition in these other countries but I think that has a lot to do with why the U.S. hasn't had these issues. Hunting is about getting out in the wild with friends and I think many hunters enjoy the hunt as much if not more than killing animals for food. There also hasn't been a high demand for wild game in the U.S. and the wild game that is for sale is typically from farms. Also, ethical hunters know that the only way to keep enjoying our sport is to support the maintance and growth of game populations.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Happy Myles wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

My last and only experience shooting songbirds was at the age of six, and resulted in a whipping and the confiscation of my Red Ryder BB gun by my Father.

It is my understanding most European hunting is done on private land only by people who can afford it. Here in the States we all still have a stake in the game and can hunt on public lands and most of us want to protect our resources. Hopefully frown on poaching.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rock rat wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Sounds like a big part of it is the market, and societal acceptance of market hunting.

Maybe also because we have so much public land with licenses so cheap and big game plentiful.

Maybe too the way this place is set up. Even if we disagree with a law we still follow it. Social contract.

Those Cypriots need some wildlife biologists to suggest laws then they need to follow them.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

They will be sorry when all the birds are gone. I pity the fools. Market hunting has never worked out long term. The unregulated are fishing out the oceans as well. Mankind has devised more efficient methods of harvest, so without enforced regulation, species are doomed. Speaking of songbirds, does anyone have a clue as to how many are killed in this country alone by house cats?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

draketaker, I just read through all of your comments so far. Go back to your bottle and leave us alone.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve Marlin wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

As a kid, my dad used to tell me about when he served in Europe in the late 50's, he could always tell who was an American driver - the American driver actually "stopped" at the stop sign. His point - Americans believe the rule of law.

Go figure - our nations wildlife is better for it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steve Marlin wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

I don't hunt over corn, does that makes me more or less blood thristy?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from santa wrote 1 year 22 weeks ago

We seem to be hunting the wrong game. We need an open seasom on spammers. I kinda like the word decimate but eradicate would seem to fit better for them.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

As I preach in my Hunter Ed classes Ethics and Respect for wildlife seperates our hunters from all others. I think that this is a prime example. We as Americans most of the time respect the law and abide by it and see the need for the law. You will always have a few who won't but now the ethical hunters will for the most part point our to law enforcement the ones who cannot abide by the law. I think this is what seperates American people from the rest of the world. I won't use the word hunters because these people aren't hunters.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dukkillr wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Uh, cause we're Americans, and they're losahs. This is basic, guys.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Yes, we made a point to enforce our laws, but why do we feel dedicated to those laws protecting wildlife when them forins could give a hoot.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Steward wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

We are a society born of liberty. People often think of liberty as just freedom. It isn't Liberty is freedom with responsibility. You mess up, you pay the price. So perhaps the answer to your question is that responsibility accompanies liberty, and since we are a land of liberty, we have shown a higher level of responsibility in our land- and animal- management.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

Anyone wanna explain what the problem with Steward's post is? There have been a lot of rampant minus votes for no reason lately. If you take issue, be a man and say so.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from thedraketaker wrote 1 year 23 weeks ago

we're all just roothless killers, admit it. we dont hunt, we put a pile of corn out and shoot whatever decides to eat it that day, its not a sport, or an act of nature, just us as humans tryin to show our dominance over an animal...and believe me, i take full advantage of it....hunters...were just sitters...sittin there waitin on somethin to pass by or walk out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Coachcl wrote 1 year 22 weeks ago

You hit it on the head. We want to make sure we can keep up with our passion. We want to make sure there are animals to hunt and that they can grow in great environments. Other nations aren't looking at that. They just want to make a quick buck. We are doing what we can to help with the conservation. Thats the important thing.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ohiodeerhunter wrote 1 year 22 weeks ago

Market hunting about killed off all the bison,the market
hunters in Fla killed off a lot of birds just for their feathers,if they keep it up over in Cyprus,they will kill all the birds off there,then wonder why there are none left.
Here,we have learned that species need to be managed,and the population kept at or above a certain level so that we can hunt,and then when our children start hunting,there will be game left for them to hunt.
We observe the hunting seasons here,don't take game when the animals have just had their fawns,or whatever for each species,so that the young animals get the chance to survive until they are older. Remember how many states had antler size rules? or the old point system for ducks?
We followed the rules,now we still have game to hunt,and so will future generations.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dtownley wrote 1 year 19 weeks ago

At this time in our history we control most of our hunting destiny and pay a pretty good sum. Our elected officials still value their job, watch their P's & Q's and our voting block elects them or not. We are the economy for a lot of areas were there is no industry and our rural counterparts value our return each year. I think sportsman come from all over the world, the bottom line is, are they afforded the opportunity to be able to shine as sportsman ? There is no place as vast in the world as the U.S.A., in open to the public hunting opportunity. Hunters are from every country, therefore, sportsman are from every country(yes poachers also ). WHEN UG's ROCK THROWING RESULTED IN DINNER HE ATE, WHEN HE THREW TO MUCH AND DID TO WELL IT RESULTED IN DINNER AND STINK'IN RANCID BREAKFAST. UG FIGURED OUT WHEN TO STOP THROWING and a sportsman was born. OPPORTUNITY = DIFFERENCE

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment