


January 19, 2011
SHOT Show 2011: Day at the Range
By Philip Bourjaily
Join Gun Nut Phil Bourjaily and Associate Online Editor (and tactical gun fanatic) Dave Maccar on the range in Nevada to get a look at some of the new guns at the 2011 SHOT Show in action.
Comments (36)
Can you check on the new Remington 1911s?
Anyone watch that short burst of rapid fire Dave let go with in that UZI lookin gun?..exactly why I don't stand behind every kind of gun ownership. Someone want to tell me that gun wasn't fully automatic?
Phil,
Thanks for including the short shotgun segment. As for the black guns, modern hunting firearms or what ever the industry wants to call them... YAAAAWWWWWN....
Same for the apparant all the rage .410 handguns. I went to a buyers show with my wife last week and could not believe all the .410 hand guns and even a revolving .410 shotgun from Rossi. Taurus certainly spawned a whole new industy with these things even new complex loads to shoot in them.
That gun was definitely full-auto, and it's definitely owned by someone with a class three license. That's legal and fine by me.
My only problem with the class three license is that I don't have one yet.
Sayfu,
I have a nagging recollection that Nevada allows certain licensed shooting ranges under certain conditions to permit restricted fully automatic shooting. Someone else may have more info.
Sayfu, I believe that was a fully auto gun. Pretty cool eh?
I live in the area whiched produced the Thompson Machine Gun. A lot of old timers still have one or two laying around the house. Every year they will get together for a shoot. It attracts a lot of media.
Probably requires police or military oversight
It was indeed full-auto. It's a Kriss Vector submachine gun chambered for .45 ACP. The receiver mechanism gives it that odd shape because there is a hinge forming an L shape inside. Basically, it directs the recoil down rather than back and up, significantly reducing muzzle rise. It felt like shooting an MP5 in 9mm. It was still a little difficult to control on full auto but in three-round burst, it was amazingly easy to keep on target, and incredibly light-weight. --Dave Maccar
I found the musical background during the shooting annoying, and the gunfire in the background during Phil's monolog was a distraction. But other than that, it was pretty crappy.
buckhunter....Not too cool by me, and why I canceled my membership to the NRA..I have to much experience dealing with the general public,
Sayfu so what if the gun dave was firing was fully automatic, if you are able to apply and get the right permits to own this type of weapon so be it. Ted Nugent owns several types of automatic weapons and he is one of the strongest and outspoken supporters of the 2nd amendment. Its kinda like this if you don't like whats on the television channel you are watching you change the channel, if you don't like this type of firearm than don't buy one!
No, it isn't exactly like that. I don't want that gun around. What kinda guarantee can the permit holder make that the gun won't end up in the hands of some kook? Personally, supporting automatic weapon ownership does damage to the cause of owning a firearm. If I were an anti-gun guy, and was allowed to testify before congress, I'd show the same U-tube type video to congress.
Wonder how strong Phil's statement is in regard to the ownership of that kinda firearm? Step up to the plate for me Phil!!
Good Clip, no pun intended. During the show did you see/shoot a KelTec PMR-30 and what did you think? If not do you think that you will do a review on the website or in the magazine?
Sayfu-
I have no use for fully automatic weapons myself, but I think we have to stand together for the collective benefit of all gun owners. I can't guarantee that one of my guns would never end up in the hands of some kook.
I am very confused. Some long haired hippie walks up, and then proceeds to fire a bunch of anti-peace, non-PC weapons?
well said, 99. we need a lot less infighting.
99 said it well? lol! Give that to any political analyst on either side of the isle, and see if they agree with 99explorer! You guys that agree with that are why gun ownership advocates will lose the battle. I'm a many, many guns owner, and I am scared to death of those things getting into some kooks hands. Just think of the vast majority of the public that doesn't own guns, and how they would react? When I get out of my car in the neighborhood, and take out my shotgun, I make sure that no one else sees me do it. I know what some woman especially would do if she drove by and saw it. I'd get a knock on my door. You guys and your "sticking together" is like liberals, blindly pursuing their failed ideology. I'm in a conservative, gun ownership state, Idaho, and show that U-tube clip on the nitely news, and the entire community would be up in arms. And if I were associated with that auto weapon? I work for the school district, and that would end immediately I can assure you. And where is Phil hiding on this issue? Come out Phil, it's OK.
I'd rather face a "kook" with an Uzi than a marine with a M1...or a Springfield...or a really pointy stick.
Sayfu
After reading your many argumentative posts on Message Boards with Hoski, Bubba, et al, and now your arcane posts above; I have concluded that you are enigmatic, delusional, a $hitstirrer, or all three.
WAM
What's the matter for a little fully automatic shooting!
“Since 1934, only one legally owned machine gun has been used in a crime of murder, and a law enforcement officer committed that crime.”
-The History Channel, Modern Marvels, Weapons at War: The Machine Gun
________________________________________________
“The Democrats ran away from gun safety in the 2002 elections, and look where it got them. Whoever is advising them on gun control should be shot.”
-Blaine Rummel, spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (in "Democrats shunning gun control", 2003-May-31, Washington Times)
____________________________________________________
“Criminals don't register their guns.”
-Murray Grismer, spokesman of the Saskatchewan Federation of Police Officers, and a 13-year veteran of the police force in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
___________________________________________________
“At first glance, it may seem odd or even perverse to suggest that statutory controls on the private ownership of firearms are irrelevant to the problem of armed crime: yet that is precisely what the evidence shows. Armed crime and violent crime generally are products of ethnic and social factors unrelated to the availability of a particular type of weapon. The number of firearms required to satisfy the crime market is minute, and these are supplied no matter what controls are instituted. Controls have had serious effect on legitimate users of firearms, but there is no case, either in the history of this country (Britain) or in the experience of other countries in which controls can be shown to have restricted the flow of weapons to criminals, or in any way reduce crime.”
-Chief Inspector Colins Greenwood, West Yorkshire Constabulary, Police Review, Britain after six months of study of firearms control systems at Cambridge University
____________________________________________________
I wish I had the cash that was burned up on that range for that event!
Lock and load,
keep the barrel hot,
and the target full of holes!
I agree that full autos in the hands of kooks are a threat. So is any kind of weapon a kook might use. The main problem I have with Sayfus aguement is that we must "hide" our gun use. Sure some folks, man or woman may notice me carrying my shotgun, rifle or muzzleloader to and from my home or heaven forbid walking down the road in my village to the neighboring forest to use it. I say too bad, grow up and accept that millions of law biding Americans own and use firearms for hunting and yes, even for recreation. If my gun is unloaded, I can carry it with pride and should be afforded the protection from people freaking out and over reacting about it. After all its one of the rights my Father and brother fought for all of us in the Army. I dont go out of my way putting it in peoples faces but c'mon I wont be ashamed of being an owner and user of firearms and fear what some may say and do when I use or travel with them. If more of us subscribe to Sayfu's approach, it will soon be the end.
sayfu: you live in Idaho and think that carrying a shotgun from your car to the house will stir up the neighbors? You must live in either Boise or Meridian, 'cause someone carrying a shot gun in MY part of Idaho wont get a second look from anyone. Including the cops. I don't really care for full auto's either, hey, I don't like semi auto's, I shoot traditional muzzleloaders but if someone wants one they have that right. There is a point at which modifying your behavior to suit the neighbors stops being manners and starts being tyranny.
I read a recent article about Brian Aitken facing a prison term for facing prison time in New Jersey for possessing unloaded firearms in his trunk while moving in New Jersey. Gov. Christie commuted his sentence, but for states that are full of active anti-gun groups I hope they know how to defeat such poorly thought out legislation that doesn't impact violent criminal that don't abide by any law. As for fully auto guns fired at desert gun ranges owned by folks who could be robbed...well in a home invasion I'll take my chances with #4 shot at close range over hip shooting lead sprayers, I had the opportunity to shoot fully auto's at the range just not someone else buying the ammo. That's nuts. If criminals can have them I sure want the right to, and if someone wants to buy the ammo-nice, hell 3 shot blast are more effective I'm told. Arkansas passes Constitutional Right To Hunt 2010. If your Gov't is not moving forward to protect your liberties, then it is moving backwards. Cheers;/
I have no objection to full auto weapons, except the are not very easy to control, and encourage "spray & pray" hoping you can actually get something near the target.
who gets all the left over brass and empty shells?
idahoe, ..It is a matter of just not wanting to stir the pot. You got to have a clue about the general public today for starters. I've had two dog catcher dudes knock on my door because some lady in the neighborhood heard me smacking my dog with a newspaper, not wanting him to get killed in the street, and turned me in. Many folks are just plain scared of guns, and they don't need to see me carrying one around in the neighborhood. I had some anti-gun guy stop his vehicle, and try to scare some partridge away last year that I was hunting. And I don't care for fully autos because it hurts the gun owner cause! I'll bet there are a lot of gun owners that don't even know that auto was legal, and would think just like I do. And where is our buddy Phil on the issue? Still hiding out? And WAHunter...don't just sit behind a monitor reading, step up to the plate and state what you know..or has your silence done that?
I am kind of amazed at all of the disparaging comments.
Everyone is not like us. I know most of you are military or law enforcement and hunters too, but there is a growing segment of the population that just enjoys going to a gun range and pulling the trigger. I think we should welcome them to our fraternity instead of chastising them for their hair or choice of weapons.
I bought myself an AR-15 for Christmas and it has renewed my interest in guns greatly. Not only can you find reasonably priced ammunition, but it is just a whole lot of fun to shoot. Suddenly I feel like a kid with his first .22 again...
You guys took this full-auto thing off on a screwy tangent. At the Media Day At The Range, a big part of the crowd is military and LEO, and at SHOT, Law Enforcement and security are major customers. Police departments and even militaries from all over the world are there shopping. There are products available for both the civilian and military/LEO markets.
As far as the footage of shooting the full-auto, hey... it's fun! If you've never shot full-auto in a non-threatening environment (nobody shooting back), it's a pretty damned cool. Has nothing to do with arming the "kooks".
HogBlog...Then the question to be answered, is...If I am a citizen, could I qualify to own one, and if so, where could I shoot it?
Snafu
I liked you better when you were confined to Backlash & Blowback argueing with Hoski and Rock Rat. Your every post proves my point.
I for one hear what sayfu is saying. There are many gun owners in this country, but there are probably MORE people who don't own guns than do. Make the majority feel like we are a lunatic fringe who don't care that legal guns do fall into the wrong hands (legally in many cases) and just wait and see where it will get us. Good luck !
sayfu, that full auto was at the range under a very controlled environment. noone is advocating walking down the street with one. i don't see why this has to be such a big issue.
Every state is different but usually you can get a silencer or a full auto with the right permits or licenses. ATF, FBI, and your local law enforcement get a chance to turn you down or to approve you if you are in my state. And they all want money. Every year.
jamesti...But could I walk down the street with one in say Idaho if I had the proper permit? Where am I allowed to shoot that thing? Try to answer some intelligent questions, or concerns please if you can. A guy responding that "I'd rather get in a conflict with a kook with one of those rather than a marine", is hardly one of those responses I was looking for...and Phil's silence kinda answers some things does it not? And I really don't bring up provocative questions, or am interested in getting a discussion going with the notion that WA Mountain man will like me. I could care less.
What an awful job. You get paid to pop caps, schmooze, eat, and write/report about firearms. Where do I go to sign up?
As I remember, the Symbionese Liberation Army had CONVERTED a number of semi-automatic rifles to automatic weapons status. I suppose the criminals give one hoot about automatic weapon laws? Seems as if the "laws" only affect the honest citizen, don't they? By the way, where ARE the bloodbath/Wild West incidents regarding concealed-carry permit holders that are endlessly predicted? Mr. Zamudio in Tucson held fire and tackled the killer instead of shooting him, didn't he?
ruckweiler..Not sure I get all your points. Of course we all know about the laws not applying to criminals. It is a PR thing. You have to convince the public you aren't making autos more available to the bad guys, by making the legal for certain folks. The notion that "anything goes" under the protection of the 2nd Amendment doesn't get it with this gun owner, and I would imagine that is the case for a lot of voters. There needs to be a lot more questions answered on the availability, who can own them, where they can shoot them, and it appears that is above the intellectual ability of the folks on these threads.
Post a Comment
Sayfu-
I have no use for fully automatic weapons myself, but I think we have to stand together for the collective benefit of all gun owners. I can't guarantee that one of my guns would never end up in the hands of some kook.
I'd rather face a "kook" with an Uzi than a marine with a M1...or a Springfield...or a really pointy stick.
That gun was definitely full-auto, and it's definitely owned by someone with a class three license. That's legal and fine by me.
My only problem with the class three license is that I don't have one yet.
Sayfu so what if the gun dave was firing was fully automatic, if you are able to apply and get the right permits to own this type of weapon so be it. Ted Nugent owns several types of automatic weapons and he is one of the strongest and outspoken supporters of the 2nd amendment. Its kinda like this if you don't like whats on the television channel you are watching you change the channel, if you don't like this type of firearm than don't buy one!
well said, 99. we need a lot less infighting.
Can you check on the new Remington 1911s?
Phil,
Thanks for including the short shotgun segment. As for the black guns, modern hunting firearms or what ever the industry wants to call them... YAAAAWWWWWN....
Same for the apparant all the rage .410 handguns. I went to a buyers show with my wife last week and could not believe all the .410 hand guns and even a revolving .410 shotgun from Rossi. Taurus certainly spawned a whole new industy with these things even new complex loads to shoot in them.
Sayfu,
I have a nagging recollection that Nevada allows certain licensed shooting ranges under certain conditions to permit restricted fully automatic shooting. Someone else may have more info.
I found the musical background during the shooting annoying, and the gunfire in the background during Phil's monolog was a distraction. But other than that, it was pretty crappy.
What's the matter for a little fully automatic shooting!
“Since 1934, only one legally owned machine gun has been used in a crime of murder, and a law enforcement officer committed that crime.”
-The History Channel, Modern Marvels, Weapons at War: The Machine Gun
________________________________________________
“The Democrats ran away from gun safety in the 2002 elections, and look where it got them. Whoever is advising them on gun control should be shot.”
-Blaine Rummel, spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence (in "Democrats shunning gun control", 2003-May-31, Washington Times)
____________________________________________________
“Criminals don't register their guns.”
-Murray Grismer, spokesman of the Saskatchewan Federation of Police Officers, and a 13-year veteran of the police force in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
___________________________________________________
“At first glance, it may seem odd or even perverse to suggest that statutory controls on the private ownership of firearms are irrelevant to the problem of armed crime: yet that is precisely what the evidence shows. Armed crime and violent crime generally are products of ethnic and social factors unrelated to the availability of a particular type of weapon. The number of firearms required to satisfy the crime market is minute, and these are supplied no matter what controls are instituted. Controls have had serious effect on legitimate users of firearms, but there is no case, either in the history of this country (Britain) or in the experience of other countries in which controls can be shown to have restricted the flow of weapons to criminals, or in any way reduce crime.”
-Chief Inspector Colins Greenwood, West Yorkshire Constabulary, Police Review, Britain after six months of study of firearms control systems at Cambridge University
____________________________________________________
I wish I had the cash that was burned up on that range for that event!
Lock and load,
keep the barrel hot,
and the target full of holes!
sayfu: you live in Idaho and think that carrying a shotgun from your car to the house will stir up the neighbors? You must live in either Boise or Meridian, 'cause someone carrying a shot gun in MY part of Idaho wont get a second look from anyone. Including the cops. I don't really care for full auto's either, hey, I don't like semi auto's, I shoot traditional muzzleloaders but if someone wants one they have that right. There is a point at which modifying your behavior to suit the neighbors stops being manners and starts being tyranny.
sayfu, that full auto was at the range under a very controlled environment. noone is advocating walking down the street with one. i don't see why this has to be such a big issue.
Sayfu, I believe that was a fully auto gun. Pretty cool eh?
I live in the area whiched produced the Thompson Machine Gun. A lot of old timers still have one or two laying around the house. Every year they will get together for a shoot. It attracts a lot of media.
Probably requires police or military oversight
It was indeed full-auto. It's a Kriss Vector submachine gun chambered for .45 ACP. The receiver mechanism gives it that odd shape because there is a hinge forming an L shape inside. Basically, it directs the recoil down rather than back and up, significantly reducing muzzle rise. It felt like shooting an MP5 in 9mm. It was still a little difficult to control on full auto but in three-round burst, it was amazingly easy to keep on target, and incredibly light-weight. --Dave Maccar
Good Clip, no pun intended. During the show did you see/shoot a KelTec PMR-30 and what did you think? If not do you think that you will do a review on the website or in the magazine?
I am very confused. Some long haired hippie walks up, and then proceeds to fire a bunch of anti-peace, non-PC weapons?
Sayfu
After reading your many argumentative posts on Message Boards with Hoski, Bubba, et al, and now your arcane posts above; I have concluded that you are enigmatic, delusional, a $hitstirrer, or all three.
WAM
I agree that full autos in the hands of kooks are a threat. So is any kind of weapon a kook might use. The main problem I have with Sayfus aguement is that we must "hide" our gun use. Sure some folks, man or woman may notice me carrying my shotgun, rifle or muzzleloader to and from my home or heaven forbid walking down the road in my village to the neighboring forest to use it. I say too bad, grow up and accept that millions of law biding Americans own and use firearms for hunting and yes, even for recreation. If my gun is unloaded, I can carry it with pride and should be afforded the protection from people freaking out and over reacting about it. After all its one of the rights my Father and brother fought for all of us in the Army. I dont go out of my way putting it in peoples faces but c'mon I wont be ashamed of being an owner and user of firearms and fear what some may say and do when I use or travel with them. If more of us subscribe to Sayfu's approach, it will soon be the end.
I read a recent article about Brian Aitken facing a prison term for facing prison time in New Jersey for possessing unloaded firearms in his trunk while moving in New Jersey. Gov. Christie commuted his sentence, but for states that are full of active anti-gun groups I hope they know how to defeat such poorly thought out legislation that doesn't impact violent criminal that don't abide by any law. As for fully auto guns fired at desert gun ranges owned by folks who could be robbed...well in a home invasion I'll take my chances with #4 shot at close range over hip shooting lead sprayers, I had the opportunity to shoot fully auto's at the range just not someone else buying the ammo. That's nuts. If criminals can have them I sure want the right to, and if someone wants to buy the ammo-nice, hell 3 shot blast are more effective I'm told. Arkansas passes Constitutional Right To Hunt 2010. If your Gov't is not moving forward to protect your liberties, then it is moving backwards. Cheers;/
You guys took this full-auto thing off on a screwy tangent. At the Media Day At The Range, a big part of the crowd is military and LEO, and at SHOT, Law Enforcement and security are major customers. Police departments and even militaries from all over the world are there shopping. There are products available for both the civilian and military/LEO markets.
As far as the footage of shooting the full-auto, hey... it's fun! If you've never shot full-auto in a non-threatening environment (nobody shooting back), it's a pretty damned cool. Has nothing to do with arming the "kooks".
Snafu
I liked you better when you were confined to Backlash & Blowback argueing with Hoski and Rock Rat. Your every post proves my point.
I for one hear what sayfu is saying. There are many gun owners in this country, but there are probably MORE people who don't own guns than do. Make the majority feel like we are a lunatic fringe who don't care that legal guns do fall into the wrong hands (legally in many cases) and just wait and see where it will get us. Good luck !
I have no objection to full auto weapons, except the are not very easy to control, and encourage "spray & pray" hoping you can actually get something near the target.
who gets all the left over brass and empty shells?
idahoe, ..It is a matter of just not wanting to stir the pot. You got to have a clue about the general public today for starters. I've had two dog catcher dudes knock on my door because some lady in the neighborhood heard me smacking my dog with a newspaper, not wanting him to get killed in the street, and turned me in. Many folks are just plain scared of guns, and they don't need to see me carrying one around in the neighborhood. I had some anti-gun guy stop his vehicle, and try to scare some partridge away last year that I was hunting. And I don't care for fully autos because it hurts the gun owner cause! I'll bet there are a lot of gun owners that don't even know that auto was legal, and would think just like I do. And where is our buddy Phil on the issue? Still hiding out? And WAHunter...don't just sit behind a monitor reading, step up to the plate and state what you know..or has your silence done that?
I am kind of amazed at all of the disparaging comments.
Everyone is not like us. I know most of you are military or law enforcement and hunters too, but there is a growing segment of the population that just enjoys going to a gun range and pulling the trigger. I think we should welcome them to our fraternity instead of chastising them for their hair or choice of weapons.
I bought myself an AR-15 for Christmas and it has renewed my interest in guns greatly. Not only can you find reasonably priced ammunition, but it is just a whole lot of fun to shoot. Suddenly I feel like a kid with his first .22 again...
HogBlog...Then the question to be answered, is...If I am a citizen, could I qualify to own one, and if so, where could I shoot it?
Every state is different but usually you can get a silencer or a full auto with the right permits or licenses. ATF, FBI, and your local law enforcement get a chance to turn you down or to approve you if you are in my state. And they all want money. Every year.
jamesti...But could I walk down the street with one in say Idaho if I had the proper permit? Where am I allowed to shoot that thing? Try to answer some intelligent questions, or concerns please if you can. A guy responding that "I'd rather get in a conflict with a kook with one of those rather than a marine", is hardly one of those responses I was looking for...and Phil's silence kinda answers some things does it not? And I really don't bring up provocative questions, or am interested in getting a discussion going with the notion that WA Mountain man will like me. I could care less.
What an awful job. You get paid to pop caps, schmooze, eat, and write/report about firearms. Where do I go to sign up?
As I remember, the Symbionese Liberation Army had CONVERTED a number of semi-automatic rifles to automatic weapons status. I suppose the criminals give one hoot about automatic weapon laws? Seems as if the "laws" only affect the honest citizen, don't they? By the way, where ARE the bloodbath/Wild West incidents regarding concealed-carry permit holders that are endlessly predicted? Mr. Zamudio in Tucson held fire and tackled the killer instead of shooting him, didn't he?
ruckweiler..Not sure I get all your points. Of course we all know about the laws not applying to criminals. It is a PR thing. You have to convince the public you aren't making autos more available to the bad guys, by making the legal for certain folks. The notion that "anything goes" under the protection of the 2nd Amendment doesn't get it with this gun owner, and I would imagine that is the case for a lot of voters. There needs to be a lot more questions answered on the availability, who can own them, where they can shoot them, and it appears that is above the intellectual ability of the folks on these threads.
No, it isn't exactly like that. I don't want that gun around. What kinda guarantee can the permit holder make that the gun won't end up in the hands of some kook? Personally, supporting automatic weapon ownership does damage to the cause of owning a firearm. If I were an anti-gun guy, and was allowed to testify before congress, I'd show the same U-tube type video to congress.
Wonder how strong Phil's statement is in regard to the ownership of that kinda firearm? Step up to the plate for me Phil!!
99 said it well? lol! Give that to any political analyst on either side of the isle, and see if they agree with 99explorer! You guys that agree with that are why gun ownership advocates will lose the battle. I'm a many, many guns owner, and I am scared to death of those things getting into some kooks hands. Just think of the vast majority of the public that doesn't own guns, and how they would react? When I get out of my car in the neighborhood, and take out my shotgun, I make sure that no one else sees me do it. I know what some woman especially would do if she drove by and saw it. I'd get a knock on my door. You guys and your "sticking together" is like liberals, blindly pursuing their failed ideology. I'm in a conservative, gun ownership state, Idaho, and show that U-tube clip on the nitely news, and the entire community would be up in arms. And if I were associated with that auto weapon? I work for the school district, and that would end immediately I can assure you. And where is Phil hiding on this issue? Come out Phil, it's OK.
buckhunter....Not too cool by me, and why I canceled my membership to the NRA..I have to much experience dealing with the general public,
Anyone watch that short burst of rapid fire Dave let go with in that UZI lookin gun?..exactly why I don't stand behind every kind of gun ownership. Someone want to tell me that gun wasn't fully automatic?
Post a Comment