What's It Worth?
NLRB To Force Companies To Turn Over Employee Telephone Numbers & E-Mail Addresses To Unions?
Union-backed NLRB Chairman: "We keep our eye on the prize."
Posted by LaborUnionReport (Diary)
Thursday, January 26th at 8:30PM EST
19 Comments
Undaunted by the constitutionally-questionable appointment of three members to Barack Obama’s National Labor Relations Board, union attorney and current NLRB chairman Mark Pearce declared in an Associated Press interview that he and his union comrades are continuing their assault on the 93% of private-sector employees who are union-free.
In fact, if Obama’s union appointees have their way, all employees who are targeted for unionization will have their employers forced to turn over their home telephone number and e-mail addresses to unions.
Ever since the 1960s, when unions have targeted companies for unionization through a NLRB-supervised election, employers have been required to turn over the list of employee names and their home addresses. The NLRB, in turn, promptly gives the list of employee names and home addresses to the involved union(s).
This list, called an Excelsior List, gives union organizers the ability to conduct intrusive home visits prior to the NLRB election. As is often said, just as when any other salesperson doing door-to-door sales knocks at the door, targeted employees can invite the union organizers into their homes, or they can sic the chihuahua on them.
The requirement to furnish the employees’ names and addresses list is mandatory. In fact, the refusal by an employer to furnish the list (or providing a list with too many errors) would typically result in the NLRB’s automatic overturning of an election if a union were to lose. Again, this requirement has been the standard since the 1960s.
Now, however, the union appointees within the Obama NLRB want to expand the current Excelsior List requirement from the mere furnishing of names and addresses to also include furnishing employees’ home telephone numbers and their e-mail addresses to enable unions to perpetually propagandize employees.
Related: The Truth About False Union Promises.
According to the AP report:
Hoski & the rodent will have a hissy fit!
There's not much, in what Moishe posted, to have a hissy fit about since this report is from an extreme right wing blog that is part of the Patriot Action Network. A report that is generated for a tea party rag is by definition, propaganda from the right. I encourage any of you who is concerned about good representation and protection in our places of work to go to the source, the NLRB web site, for a clear statement of purpose and an explanation of proposed changes. In brief, the NLRB states: "The proposed amendments are designed to fix flaws in the Board’s current procedures that build in unnecessary delays, allow wasteful litigation, and fail to take advantage of modern communication technologies." Go to this link and read the chart for clarifications on all this... https://www.nlrb.gov/Proposed%20Amendments
When Obama stacks the NLRB board with known liberals does anyone really think you get a "clear statement" of their purpose? Liberal intent is never "clear", NEVER! What then takes place is very clear, but too late to do much about it in the near future anyway. The history of a liberals "clear intent", and the consequences are well documented.
Yah sure you betcha danno, and the Pope was not in the Hitler Jugend either?
The NLRB is charged with conducting elections for labor union representation and with investigating and remedying unfair labor practices. So, what ever can be done to expedite those goals makes for more efficient governance. Obviously, a Republican administration would likely name Board members more interested in hamstringing this agency, rather than fulfilling its mandate.
in response to Dakotah Dan, his view that "a tea party rag is right wing propoganda", then he is evidently against free speech and alternative views. He is evidently a left wing radical who will stiffle any dissent.
No Dick. I am a big supporter of free speech. But, if all of my sources were from Keith Olbermann type journalists, then you would have reason to criticize me for depending on left wing rags. I may be more liberal than you on some issues, but you don't know me well enough to know if I am a left wing radical. The classic left wing radical would likely be the person protesting limits on free speech, getting pepper sprayed and/or arrested; and you should be thanking him or her for doing their patriotic duty.
Hey Mois...err Jere,
Back to your old habits I see.
Meds blocking out original thought again?
Mr. Johnson, (sorry, the filter won't accept the use of your first name0,
I see nothing in DD's post that can remotely be construed as stifling free speech. He merely comments that Moishe...err Jere, has yet again displayed his failure to take the time and effort necessary to post his own thoughts and yet again, resorts to plagiarism.
Something you will no doubt discover Moishe/Jere is infamous for.
I don't have time or resouces nor a desire to thry and mak our resident marxists happy so buzs off.
try!
But if you guys don't mind you e-mails and telephone numbers being in their data base you are complete morons, hell give them your bank's info on you too. (They have their eye on the prize!) heh Heh
Oh and Hoski Playing games with my hame is juvenile.
name*
Post a Reply
When Obama stacks the NLRB board with known liberals does anyone really think you get a "clear statement" of their purpose? Liberal intent is never "clear", NEVER! What then takes place is very clear, but too late to do much about it in the near future anyway. The history of a liberals "clear intent", and the consequences are well documented.
in response to Dakotah Dan, his view that "a tea party rag is right wing propoganda", then he is evidently against free speech and alternative views. He is evidently a left wing radical who will stiffle any dissent.
But if you guys don't mind you e-mails and telephone numbers being in their data base you are complete morons, hell give them your bank's info on you too. (They have their eye on the prize!) heh Heh
There's not much, in what Moishe posted, to have a hissy fit about since this report is from an extreme right wing blog that is part of the Patriot Action Network. A report that is generated for a tea party rag is by definition, propaganda from the right. I encourage any of you who is concerned about good representation and protection in our places of work to go to the source, the NLRB web site, for a clear statement of purpose and an explanation of proposed changes. In brief, the NLRB states: "The proposed amendments are designed to fix flaws in the Board’s current procedures that build in unnecessary delays, allow wasteful litigation, and fail to take advantage of modern communication technologies." Go to this link and read the chart for clarifications on all this... https://www.nlrb.gov/Proposed%20Amendments
Yah sure you betcha danno, and the Pope was not in the Hitler Jugend either?
The NLRB is charged with conducting elections for labor union representation and with investigating and remedying unfair labor practices. So, what ever can be done to expedite those goals makes for more efficient governance. Obviously, a Republican administration would likely name Board members more interested in hamstringing this agency, rather than fulfilling its mandate.
No Dick. I am a big supporter of free speech. But, if all of my sources were from Keith Olbermann type journalists, then you would have reason to criticize me for depending on left wing rags. I may be more liberal than you on some issues, but you don't know me well enough to know if I am a left wing radical. The classic left wing radical would likely be the person protesting limits on free speech, getting pepper sprayed and/or arrested; and you should be thanking him or her for doing their patriotic duty.
I don't have time or resouces nor a desire to thry and mak our resident marxists happy so buzs off.
try!
Oh and Hoski Playing games with my hame is juvenile.
name*
Hoski & the rodent will have a hissy fit!
Hey Mois...err Jere,
Back to your old habits I see.
Meds blocking out original thought again?
Mr. Johnson, (sorry, the filter won't accept the use of your first name0,
I see nothing in DD's post that can remotely be construed as stifling free speech. He merely comments that Moishe...err Jere, has yet again displayed his failure to take the time and effort necessary to post his own thoughts and yet again, resorts to plagiarism.
Something you will no doubt discover Moishe/Jere is infamous for.
Post a Reply