
In 1936, Winchester Repeating Arms brought forth a rifle that was as close to a masterpiece as a firearm can be: the Model 70. Boasting the best trigger ever put on a sporting rifle, it was handsome, dead reliable and, for its time, accurate. It was a complex gun to make, but since labor was cheap at the time this was not a factor, and the Model 70s that were produced before World War II were beautifully made.
But by the end of World War II, Winchester’s factory was a mausoleum, its machinery worn out and its labor force hostile. As a result, the quality of the Model 70 declined steadily. Concerned about the cost of manufacturing the rifle, in 1964 Winchester debuted a new Model 70 that was cheaper to build.
The new “push-feed” rifle was more accurate than its “controlled-feed” predecessor, but it was so ugly that it had shooters contemplating suicide. People didn’t buy it in droves. After a while Winchester (by now called U.S. Repeating Arms) brought back the old-style Model 70, but the quality was no longer there, and the company itself was in deep trouble. The end came in 2006 when the New Haven, Conn., plant that made the Model 70 was shut down.
A Southern-Made 70
Early in 2008, Herstal of Belgium, which owns FN, Winchester, and Browning, announced that it intended to bring back the old-style Model 70. It would be made in the FN plant in Columbia, S.C., that produces small arms for the U.S. military. But by late summer no guns had appeared. The problem, it turned out, was that Winchester wanted to do it right this time, and there’s a considerable difference between turning out a good machine gun and producing a fine sporting rifle.
I finally got my hands on an all-Columbia Model 70 in September of last year. It was a Featherweight Deluxe, a faithful duplicate of the old Featherweight. The slender beauty had a 22-inch barrel, a slim fore-end with a Schnabel tip, and a ribbon-checkering pattern.
The M.O.A. Trigger
The old Model 70 trigger came to glory because of its extreme simplicity; once tuned up, it stayed set forever. Considerable skill was required to do this, however, and an untuned Model 70 trigger was a horror. So Winchester replaced it with the M.O.A. Trigger, which can be adjusted simply by turning screws. It’s set for 33⁄4 pounds at the factory; the one I had measured 4 pounds and had a dead clean pull. Although it’s not as simple or rugged as the old design, for a production rifle it makes worlds of sense.
Out-of-the-Box Accuracy
Its reputation notwithstanding, the Model 70 has never been a notably accurate rifle. Some do shoot well, and if you want to put in a lot of work on one of the old ones it will shoot just fine. But straight out of the box? No. Until now. The Featherweight I shot will group with anything. The barrel is free-floated, and the recoil lug and tang are bedded in what appears to be steel-based epoxy.
I tried the gun out with factory ammo and handloads, bullet weights of 150 to 200 grains. For whatever perverse reason, the only load it did not shoot well was Federal factory loaded with Nosler 165-grain Ballistic Tips. These veered into 2.24 inches. However, handloads with 150-grain Sierra Pro Hunter bullets averaged .581 inch overall. HSM ammo, which is a bargain brand sold by Cabela’s, put 165-grain softpoints into .873 inch. Winchester Supreme ammo with Nosler 180-grain E-Tips grouped at .943. Handloads using 200-grain Swift A-Frames turned in .99 inch. This is very good accuracy by today’s exacting standards, and it’s far, far better than any other Model 70 I’ve shot.
Worth the Wait?
Right now, versions of the reborn Model 70 include the Ultimate Shadow, the Extreme Weather SS (which is all-stainless and synthetic), the Featherweight Deluxe, the Sporter Deluxe, and the Super Grade. They range from $739 to $1,169.
Are they worth it? If the rifle I tested is any indication, the answer is yes. My Featherweight Deluxe had eye-popping wood, flawless checkering, a fine trigger, excellent fit and finish, and superior accuracy. And, of course, the slick, certain cycling that made the gun famous in the first place. What more could you ask?
Comments (16)
I see nothing wrong with a simple rifle that can be used for many (if not all things) that a rifle is designed for. I don't see how the Model 70 ever went out of style.
Nate
Have to presume this was a .30-06. Hopefully, people will buy them to keep them in production. Highly likely to be the next rifle I buy. Just have to decide which caliber. Seems an American-made rifle should just have an American caliber.
I saw this piece in the magazine. Petzal has me pumped about the revamped Model 70, and it'll likely be my next rifle, also, and in .30-06 to boot. It looks beautiful, and it's built in the US. What's not to like?
I just bought one of these model 70's, chambered in .270. Beautiful rifle, beautiful handling. Accuracy, however, is very very bad. my best group so far has been over 2 inches. I've tried every brand and bullet weight available to me, including handloads. anybody have any ideas? will winchester "fix" it? I hope so, if not, they can have it back.
I also previously read this article. I have since closely examined the new Model 70s and found what appeared to be exceptionally well made rifles. Given FN's involvement is an immediate tip that all is well. I have never shot a new one but do distinctly remember that many of the older ones, including the pre-64s, were not known for extraordinary accuracy. It was however good enough and most everyone valued the action design. Since I personally don't care for winged safeties of any kind I tended to stay away from the M-70s although I never really faulted them in any other way. I always admired the esthetics of the Featherweights and the Super Grades. Actually some of the post-64s proved to shoot better than our earlier more cherished versions in spite of their other obvious shortcomings.
I want one.
I loved the model 70 Feather Weight and I will probably buy the new one. It along with thte Ruger M77 International are two rifles that just jump out at me when I open the safe. I love the looks of them! I truely hope that the model 70 lives on there are a few out there that will shoot the hair off a nat's A$$ but only a few, I'd love to see that be the norm rather than the exception.
Im glad to see a quality American made product brought back to life. great article it made me want to go out and buy one of these rifles.
I love my pre-64 .270, I'd love a new featherweight in .25-06. Glad this legend is being made in the U.S.A. again.
i like it
Picked up a new Winchester catalog. Noticed the featherweight model has an angled comb stock instead of straight. Anyone know why?
By the way, the more I look at the .300 WSM the more it makes total sense. Now leaning toward a .300 WSM Sporter instead of the .30-06 Featherweeght. Who am I kidding ... will probably end up with both.
I sent my model 70 back and they couldn't get it to shoot either, so their replacing it. I should have it back soon, i'll update on the accuracy after i've shot it a little.
My grandpa left me a Model 70 in .30-06, and it's as accurate as can be. He took excellent care of it and it's on the money every time I sight in.
I own 2 model 70 rifles and I love both of them as if they were my children. I wouldn't change a thing!
The "Rifleman's Rifle". Mine is the worst, ugly one; but I still love it. A .243, I got in 1965 when I graduated from high school. I've written about it on my website. I've had affairs with nicer guns, but it's a cherished, dependable, old friend that has never let me down. It's taken most of my deer. None has made more than a few bounds. I've never changed the scope settings, it shoots the same year after year. Groups are around an inch and a half usually. But! When I was 19, it shot a 3/8" group, and won a match.
Buck@score-your-hunting.com
I know some folks are real particualr and enjoy discussing the nuances to the nth degree about the best this and that. My own experience is the first rifle I ever bought was a Model 70 winchester synthetic stock with a stainless barrel. I have taken 3 deer with it.... and I have only shot at four; I would attribute the miss to buck fever-not the rifle. Whenever I take it to the range, it performs exceptionally as long as I am practicing good marksmanship discpline with respect to body and sight alignement, breathing, discipline, and patience. Every time it is spot on with excellent groupings at 300 yeards. My maintanence would shame my drill instructor, but nonetheless my rile has held up resiliantly and bears no sign of wear despite being used in a wet, temperate rain forest. The bolt slides smooth as silk and never fails, sticks, or mis feeds. Ive shot hundreds of rounds and it has never hinted at failure. To be fair, I have never used another rifle-because I have never seen the need to. I only recently purchased the new Extreme weather SS Winchester model 70 because my special lady got it for me as a birthday gift. I plan on giving my old rifle to my son as a gift; its hard thing for me to do but I am sure that gun will easily outlive me. Thats my 2 cents on Winchester.
Post a Comment
I see nothing wrong with a simple rifle that can be used for many (if not all things) that a rifle is designed for. I don't see how the Model 70 ever went out of style.
Nate
I saw this piece in the magazine. Petzal has me pumped about the revamped Model 70, and it'll likely be my next rifle, also, and in .30-06 to boot. It looks beautiful, and it's built in the US. What's not to like?
Have to presume this was a .30-06. Hopefully, people will buy them to keep them in production. Highly likely to be the next rifle I buy. Just have to decide which caliber. Seems an American-made rifle should just have an American caliber.
I just bought one of these model 70's, chambered in .270. Beautiful rifle, beautiful handling. Accuracy, however, is very very bad. my best group so far has been over 2 inches. I've tried every brand and bullet weight available to me, including handloads. anybody have any ideas? will winchester "fix" it? I hope so, if not, they can have it back.
I also previously read this article. I have since closely examined the new Model 70s and found what appeared to be exceptionally well made rifles. Given FN's involvement is an immediate tip that all is well. I have never shot a new one but do distinctly remember that many of the older ones, including the pre-64s, were not known for extraordinary accuracy. It was however good enough and most everyone valued the action design. Since I personally don't care for winged safeties of any kind I tended to stay away from the M-70s although I never really faulted them in any other way. I always admired the esthetics of the Featherweights and the Super Grades. Actually some of the post-64s proved to shoot better than our earlier more cherished versions in spite of their other obvious shortcomings.
I want one.
I loved the model 70 Feather Weight and I will probably buy the new one. It along with thte Ruger M77 International are two rifles that just jump out at me when I open the safe. I love the looks of them! I truely hope that the model 70 lives on there are a few out there that will shoot the hair off a nat's A$$ but only a few, I'd love to see that be the norm rather than the exception.
Im glad to see a quality American made product brought back to life. great article it made me want to go out and buy one of these rifles.
I love my pre-64 .270, I'd love a new featherweight in .25-06. Glad this legend is being made in the U.S.A. again.
i like it
Picked up a new Winchester catalog. Noticed the featherweight model has an angled comb stock instead of straight. Anyone know why?
By the way, the more I look at the .300 WSM the more it makes total sense. Now leaning toward a .300 WSM Sporter instead of the .30-06 Featherweeght. Who am I kidding ... will probably end up with both.
I sent my model 70 back and they couldn't get it to shoot either, so their replacing it. I should have it back soon, i'll update on the accuracy after i've shot it a little.
I know some folks are real particualr and enjoy discussing the nuances to the nth degree about the best this and that. My own experience is the first rifle I ever bought was a Model 70 winchester synthetic stock with a stainless barrel. I have taken 3 deer with it.... and I have only shot at four; I would attribute the miss to buck fever-not the rifle. Whenever I take it to the range, it performs exceptionally as long as I am practicing good marksmanship discpline with respect to body and sight alignement, breathing, discipline, and patience. Every time it is spot on with excellent groupings at 300 yeards. My maintanence would shame my drill instructor, but nonetheless my rile has held up resiliantly and bears no sign of wear despite being used in a wet, temperate rain forest. The bolt slides smooth as silk and never fails, sticks, or mis feeds. Ive shot hundreds of rounds and it has never hinted at failure. To be fair, I have never used another rifle-because I have never seen the need to. I only recently purchased the new Extreme weather SS Winchester model 70 because my special lady got it for me as a birthday gift. I plan on giving my old rifle to my son as a gift; its hard thing for me to do but I am sure that gun will easily outlive me. Thats my 2 cents on Winchester.
My grandpa left me a Model 70 in .30-06, and it's as accurate as can be. He took excellent care of it and it's on the money every time I sight in.
I own 2 model 70 rifles and I love both of them as if they were my children. I wouldn't change a thing!
The "Rifleman's Rifle". Mine is the worst, ugly one; but I still love it. A .243, I got in 1965 when I graduated from high school. I've written about it on my website. I've had affairs with nicer guns, but it's a cherished, dependable, old friend that has never let me down. It's taken most of my deer. None has made more than a few bounds. I've never changed the scope settings, it shoots the same year after year. Groups are around an inch and a half usually. But! When I was 19, it shot a 3/8" group, and won a match.
Buck@score-your-hunting.com
Post a Comment