Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Petzal: Welcome Back Redfield Scopes

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 08, 2010

Petzal: Welcome Back Redfield Scopes

By David E. Petzal

If your hams are weak, you have a scant supply of wits, and your eyes purge thick amber and plum tree gum, the title of this post will mean a great deal to you, because Redfield was once at the top of the scope heap, and its decline and fall were a sorry thing to see. Redfield got into the scope business in 1959 by acquiring Kollmorgen Optical, and retained the three knurled rings on the ocular-lens housing that were the trademark of Kollmorgen’s Bear Cub scopes. To shooters of my generation, those three rings were as meaningful as the Cadillac logo.

From the get-go, the Redfield was a top-line scope. Redfield was also an important innovator. In 1962 it introduced the first-ever constantly-centered non-magnifying reticle. In 1966 came the Accu-Range rangefinder system (You think these things are new?) and the Marine Corps selected a special green-finish Redfield 3X-9X for use on its new M-40 sniper rifle. In 1968, Redfield introduced the Model 3200 target scope, which was the first high-magnification scope sight (16X, 20X, and 24X) with internal adjustments, which saved lots of weight and mechanical complications and allowed the scopes to be mounted low. This prompted me, and fools like me, to give up our wonderful Unertl scopes with external adjustments and return-to-battery springs.

But over the years the rot set in. As Redfield’s quality declined, Leupold’s quality rose, and by the late 1970s the number-one scope wore a gold ring instead of three knurled rings. The decline through the 80s and 90s was steady, and Redfield was owned in succession by Blount, ATK, and Meade, none of which could bring back the brand successfully. 

By now Redfield was damaged goods. There were a lot of perfectly sound scopes out there, but there were also a lot of dogs. So when the torch passed to Leupold, people asked themselves “WTF?” Well, it just may be that Leuopld can bring its erstwhile competitor back from the dead.

The re-born Redfields are made in Oregon, which is part of the United States. There are four models: a 2X-7X, 3X-9X, 3X-9X x 50mm, and  4X-12X. They come with a choice of 4-Plex or Accu-Range reticles. All are plain-vanilla, no-frills scopes. And, oh yes, they start at $129 and go up to $219.

For the past several months I’ve used two 3X-9Xs, one with Accu-Range and one with 4-Plex. They are good, sound scopes with accurate adjustments and nice optics. I can find no fault with either of them. They are as good an economy-priced scope as I know of, and maybe a bit better. I think Leupold has been very smart about this; it’s the right scope at the right time.

I don’t think the new Redfields are in the pipeline just yet, but you can read their full story on the Redfield website. It’s good to have those three rings back.

Comments (82)

Top Rated
All Comments
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

My son still has a Redfied Widefield 2-7x on his 7mm Rem Mag that I took off my M-700 .35 Whelen many years ago. I had recycled it off a Savage 99, for which it was way out of proportion. I also had a 4x Redfield that got sold with another rifle that I wish I still had.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Great to see the Redfield line back in business. I still
have one functional 3 X 9 Widefield in service, and still remember a 2 X 7 on a .30-'06 that accounted for a number of deer, hogs and coyotes. Is there any mention of bring back the Widefield?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from .88Mag wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

"The re-born Redfields are made in Oregon, which is part of the United States."

There are times, I would say, that those living in the Peoples Republic of Portland would hate to hear those words.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The new Redfield scopes are manufactured in the Leupold plant in Oregon and carry a forever warranty. If Leupold is backing them, I'd say that warranty is good.

Also, I've seen some of the models available through midswayusa.com. I'll be sticking one on a gun for my son's first deer season next year.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Many individuals, organizations, manufactureers and companys that start off as innovative and making a real differance in their sector, often decline and crumble. Nevertheless, they make a mark and pave some ground for those that follow. It actually makes me feel good that Leupold, which is on "top of the heap", is showing this kind of honor to the champion that went before. Kudos

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bernie wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have a couple 4X Redfields, one a Traditional from 1968, the other a Widefield from about 1971. I also have a 6X Widefield from 1971 or so. None has ever given me a problem. I am glad that I missed the decline in quality that ensued in later years, but I remember it well when many hunters were dissatisfied with Redfield.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I had a Redfield 4x on a marlin 30/30 when I was in high school. Around here at that time that was about as good as a youngster could ever hope for.

Maybe the time has come for their resurgence. MADE IN USA - God bless 'em!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Forever warranty. Made in America. If the quality is as good as described from this and other reviews I may not buy another Nikon.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

vtbluegrass quote "Forever warranty. Made in America. If the quality is as good as described from this and other reviews I may not buy another Nikon."

I'm sure that's what Leupold is hoping for......

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Glad to hear about this!! I will get one ASAP.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from rlriggins wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

In 1978 I bought a Ruger M77 in .270 and mounted a 2X7 Redfield scope. For over 25 years that was my go to rig. One year I fell part way down an Idaho mountain banging the scope so hard that the windage cap was jammed onto the scope and had to be removed with pliers. I checked the sighting which was still very close and used the rig the next day to take a nice 5X5 bull elk. The last few years the scope has topped my muzzleloader and is still doing the job as well as ever. For us older shooters who watched Redfield scopes go from excellent to junk it is nice to see the Redfield name once again on a quality scope. The fact they are Made In The USA only makes that sweeter yet.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave,

I'm attendend a dealer show with Ms. Beekeeper as I type. Just visited with the Redfield folks and they are selling well. Sales guy said the scopes were the basic equal of the VARI-X I. I like the looks of them. You are right, no frills except the for the Accu-
Range Reticle. But, as they say the fancier the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain!

Look out for higher gun prices this year. Big Green was through the roof, as were several others...

Thought I had found a little 28 GA but alas it will require delivery of the first born. A little late for that so I had to pass. Still hope for you young fellows out there...

Another sad note, it appears the slow economy has done away with a great many of the booth babes...

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Beekeeper: That is bitter news about the booth babes. I have to go to SHOT anyay.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Hey Bee,

You already have your booth babe!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave -

How would you rate this re-vamped Redfield as compared to the Weaver 40/44 that F&S rated so highly last year (for an "budget-conscious" scope)? Thanks.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from 007 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have one of the old Redfield 3x9's with the TV screen reticle on my 7mm Remington magnum, and it still works just fine. A Redfield 2x7 might be just the ticket for my .35 Remington as well. Well done, Leupold, and thanks.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave:

Sounds like an article: "Can you get a decent scope for under $200?" Be fun to get a $200 Weaver or one of these Redfields, stick it on a $300 Marlin or $400 Mossberg or Savage with Weaver mounts, and get in some range time.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

During the 80's Redfield constantly screwed the owners by not holding up to their lifetime warranty. So for two reasons quality and service after the sale fail!

Warranty Information

When Leupold purchased Redfield in April, 2008, Leupold did not assume the Redfield warranty. Because many Redfield customers have contacted Leupold with regard to the former Redfield warranty, Leupold is making this information available to Redfield optics owners.

At this time, three Redfield repair facilities are available should your Redfield product require service: Parson's Scope Service (513-867-0820), ABO USA Inc (305-859-2010) and Iron Sight Inc. (918-445-2001). The contacts provided are for information purposes only, as these companies are not affiliated with Leupold & Stevens. Please contact them for all information regarding repair, service, and associated charges.

As a courtesy we are now offering 20% off the price of a new Leupold scope, up to $100, in trade for any defective Redfield scope. If you would like to take us up on that offer you may call us at 1-800-LEUPOLD.

Bottom line

If your a Redfield owner like me, your screwed!

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I still use my old Redfield Widefield Accu-Trac 3-9X on my Winchester Model 70. You all may remember that Redfield was one of the original scopes to use 2 stadia wire to bracket the deer's brisket to determine distance. Then one just dials in the Accu-Trac knob (elevation adjustment) for the proper yards. It has accounted for many deer.
I sent it to the last company who tried to make a go of the Redfield name and they offered me a so-called deal to buy up to one of their name scopes. If I declined, it was an 8 - 10 week wait for my original Redfield to be serviced. I told them "no thanks, I'll wait 8 - 10 weeks!"
It is not as good in low light as some of the new scopes but I can see well enough to shoot in the last few minutes of legal shooting light.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Regarding ABO USA Inc., they did manage to repair a separated reticle in my old Redfield, but their cost was
a little steep for the value received, IMHO. Also, they took an excessively long time to complete the repair and return the scope, and of course, there was the mandatory letter a month after they received the scope recommending more service at more cost. I won't use this vendor again.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I thought they were going to come back in on the high end. Guess that didn't figure into Leupold's business model. Oh, well. Good to have the name back, but what next? Ramp upscale? Or replace Leupold low end models?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Someday Dave will admit that Sightron is as good as anything out there. Of course that will cost a few endorsement deals!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have an old Redfield widefield 3-9 i plan on putting on my new rifle. There is no shortage of old ones on Ebay either, still commanding decent money. Glad to see an icon reborn. Glad they are in the affordable quality bracket, I may actually buy one.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

To auburn_hunter: Don't know, because the Redfield is a completely new scope and I like to keep them in use for a year or so before I make pronouncements like that. I've never had a problem with one of the new Weavers.

To Walt Smith: Endorsement deal? Where? Who do I contact?

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I certainly like my Sightron S-II. That big red R on the right side of the Redfield objective bell is fugly.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

i was gonna get a decently priced scope for my model 99 savage but i would like to see the quality and support offered from redfield or leupold before i pick up one of them. waiting to hear how they are. dave, you are going to be held personally responsible if the booth babes are not present at SHOT! get on it and don't let us down!!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from 86Ram wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I mentioned this back in the answers section a few weeks ago lol... Leupold brings back Redfield Scopes

Anyways, I own a Redfield Partner II..bought it in 96
Great scope.

I'm glad to see the scopes rebirth and still being made in the USA and by a reputable company in its own right.
My hats off to leupold.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Speaking of quality scopes, anyone have any experience with Kahles Helia series riflescopes?

I know they are a bit pricey, but I may have a chance to pick up one at a good price from a private sale.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Just thought I'd let everybody know that Bushnell has done me right by replacing the 3200 that I bought 5+/- years ago! The original scope was not expensive (as scopes go) but it was bright and served very well up 'til now-- even in the most rainy of the Pacific Northwest's weather!

And the Booth Babe discussion is on again. I love this time of year! I get to provoke whoever will read my posts to "love and good deeds"!

As hunters, we expect nothing less than a solid hunting ethic from our online field and stream posters and regularly encourage each other to "do right" in the field. Even though we highly value hunting, I would propose to all that one's marriage and family are really far more valuable and important. Our behavior should be governed by an ethic that honors our wives, protects our children and guards our hearts when tempted to break our commitments of fidelity. Anything else is poaching.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JCB wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Good move by Leopold. Use the Redfield name, that is all ready known in the trade, to market a lower priced scope of good quality. The Leopold name stays on the higher end line. They bring a scope to market that is made in the USA and beats back the China junk. Go Leopold and Redfield!! Buy American!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I remember back in June of 87 in Alaska, my Redfield Widefield 3x9 fogged up while hunting. I remembered back the summer of 1968 my Father purchased several Redfield Widefield 3x9’s keeping two and giving the rest to other friends. He put one on his Remington Model 721 which is still there today and the other on my 03-A3 during the final Custom job. I mailed the warranty card in and remembering the Life Time Warranty and really believed I had a quality Scope for life. Back to June 87, I sent the scope back to Redfield still in good working order and when I received it back, the invoice said the scope was too old and when I pulled the scope out of the box, the locking ring on the rear eye peace was broken and was barley screwed on with what nitrogen that remain was gone. I called Redfield and the Manager said for X-amount of dollars I could trade the scope in and what happened to my scope was too bad! I went back and forth with Redfield for two months, went ahead and traded the scope in for a rebuilt then it was payback time. Not only I was on the Air Force High Power Team, I ran the Base Range for recreational shooting, The Director for High Power Competition for the Tanana Valley Sportsmen Association and the President of the Sportsmen Council for the BX at Eielson and did I put the news out about Redfield. In fact, the sales and presence of Redfields became really scarce and the only one you came across was those who brought them in from the lower 48. The #1 by far the biggest bang for the buck and service after the sales in central Alaska was Leupold. They flat out stood behind there warranty! Not only that, one had a really bad fall sheep hunting totaling the Leuplold 3x9x40 Vari-X II. It looked like a bulldozer ran across it and backed up over twice! The owner showed it to me at the range and wanted to know if Leupold would fix it? Man, I really don’t think so, but he sent it in anyhow. Because the front bell was bent at the tube, they warranted it, NO JOKE! Because of that, Leupold became the #1 scope in the Fairbanks area.

I’m glad to see Redfield out of business for all they have done to the shooting public and glad to see a reputable optical company such as Leupold to take it over, a company I know for a fact who will be there tomorrow!!!!!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

My Redfield scope, 1970's vintage, was a sorry example to keep and I sold it...bad memories of opening day "fogging". The prices seem reasonable?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Clay and Ralph...
Had my own warranty problems with Redfield. Fogged scope, one of my favorites. Sent to Redfield for repair, it was sent back, with a similar nasty marketing note, that you too, for big bucks, could purchase another Redfield. Warranty was not in their vocab.

Will not own, purchase, or borrow another Redfield.

Blue

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I love my VXIII Leupolds but if this new Bushnell 6500 Elite I just bought turns out as good as Dave says Bushnell will become my new brand.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

There are those who will spend a dime to make a dollar, those are the one are successful. For Leupold, they did just that and the results was not just making that additional 90 cents on that dime, they earned a respect bar none which is priceless!

As for those who will save a dime and loose a dollar? GO FIGURE!

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Now if Chevrolet would follow this example! Another story for another day!

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I still have my Redfield 6X18 on my Remington 700 Varmint Special in .308. Cutting edge back in 1976 when I carried that package up to Alaska.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from yeloston wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Does anyone know where I can find see-thru scope caps to fit my Redfield Widefield 3-9?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

yeloston

That's a very good question and I haven't seen any

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

With any merger, for the better company weeds out those of the other company like eradicating a cancer and make sure they are directly within the standards of the better.

I've witnessed Company mergers and within a year, the cancer/virus (people) who brought the other company to its knees has effected the entire company bringing it down!

Leupold I say to you, beware!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntenthusiest wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

A few years back I picked up a S&W Model A in 30-06 from a retired doctor. It's got a 3-9 Widefield that's handsome and accurate as is the rifle.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have had only one issue with a Leupold scope. When I put the 3.5 X 10 VariX III on my .338, it did not have enough elevation adjustment to get a 200 yd. zero. After consulting the dealer, he called, and Leupold's factory rep said "Give him a new scope, send me the old scope, and I will replace the scope you give to the customer."
This was over the phone! Pretty good attitude of standing behind your product, so if Leupold is backing the Redfield line, I would try one of the NEW Redfields if I come to need a new scope.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from albertahunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I bot a Redfield illuminator 3x9 top of the line over 30 years ago for my 300Win magnum. Incredible then and still great. Range finder and drop comp are extremely accurate and have worked flawlessly. I have been looking for years for used ones for my other guns but obviously everyone keeps them or passes them down as they are rare or over priced. Just getting bit old for the kick of the 300 but the memories.............

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from wingshooter54 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Way back in my sophomore year of college, I acquired one of the first Ruger Model 77's in 7x57 to hit Carter's Country in Houston, Texas. (I had read too much Jack O'Connor and W.D.M. Bell) The rifle took most of my mad money, and all I could afford was a Redfield 4x with duplex reticle. (after all, 4x was all Jack used on his beloved 270 and Bell used open sights) For many years that was my only rifle, accounting for Texas whitetails, a few exotics, and pronghorn antelope. Having one of the early Ruger barrels, the best it ever grouped was 1.5" for 3 shots at 100 yards. However, it would place the first shot from a cold barrel exactly 3 inches high every single time. Hunting in the Texas hill country once, a loose rock on a hillside put me flat on my back and ass and I slid a hundred feet or so down the hillside. The Ruger had some serious scratches and gouges in the wood, (it was between me and the rocks)the recoil pad was cracked loose on one side, and the Redfield looked like it had been worked over with a wire brush. Getting back to camp, it put the first shot exactly 3" high like it always had which is a testament to the Ruger ring mounting sytem and a tough as nails scope. I sure as hell wish I still had that rifle and scope.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

We all thought for years that Weaver scopes was the scope to buy,wrong,they so out priced and out qualified now that the cheapo Simmons is equal to them and I got a 4 and a 6 power Weaver that both are over 55 ys old. O tey ok to100 yds for late Am to early PM, but the multi-coated lenses now will do a much better job. I feel we gonna see a new round of B/P guns soon, these with he levr on the trigger guard will be shot lived.You will see some with the lever on top ( as our old faithful single shots had), which I call break-action, not levr action. ASk Mr. Knight about the newer batch of Knight B/P, Noticed Jim Shockley has switched to T/C, wonder how much T/P paid him? no doubt T/C a great rifle, I like a B/P Enscore myself with some extra bbls.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Gunslinger

O’Yes Weaver Scopes another company here today and to be sold off tomorrow! Two brand of scopes I will not but, Weaver and Redfield. Both burned me and my friends to the 4th degree they did!!!

With Leupold owning Redfield what guarantee will I have in buying another Redfield. Is the “OLD GUARD” still at or will they resurface later at the helm at Redfield?!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

yeloston,
The last see-thru scope covers I saw was made or at least sold by Leopold if memory serves. It should fit your scope after all 40mm is 40mm, right? I'd call them.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cverstrate wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I've got a 3x9 Redfield low profile widefield scope circa 70's or 80's on my 30-.06 and have been nothing but happy. Welcome back Redfield.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I'm glad to see an affordable, quality scope being made in the USA. Hats of to Leupold for their VX I, and now for Redfields. I'm also glad to see some enthusiasm for "made in America" products. Sure German and Japanese scopes are nice, but so are American ones, and our country needs the business a helluva lot more than they do. Hopefully this trend continues. I've never owned a Redfield, but I'll definitely take a good hard look at them the next time I need a scope.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

FYI, I sent an Email to Leupold Sales to invite them to respond to all of this. Guess will see what happens, but I'm not holding my breath. I hope I'm wrong

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Del,
I have two Bushnell 6500 Elites - a 4x30 mil-dot and a 2.5x16 mil-dot. The 4x30 is still growing on me but the 2.5x16 is ALL THAT. I am impressed. To my eyes it compares quite favorably to my Dad's Swarovski 4x12x50 with his having an ever so slight edge at near-dark. It ought to for the $$$.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Carney,

My mention of the "Booth Babes" or "Booth Bait" as my wife calls them was merely a comedic attempt to reflect the facts of our rough economic times. Said times have forced companies to cut down on extravagance including the freebies they used to give away and which I greatly enjoyed. As WMH stated, I already have my "Babe"!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

If there are slim pickin's at SHOT, maybe R. Lee Ermy can yell at Mr. Petzal a time or two to get him calibrated! LOL

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

As a lot of you know, I don’t shy away from telling the truth. I just got off the phone with Leupold and had a somewhat lengthy conversation.

So here is the Scoop from the Coop!

After my conversation with Leupold and Redfield is now owned, managed, operated and carry the same Leupold warranty, I have made the decision to remove Redfield off my “BLACK LIST” and put them and refer to them as the Leupold line (Family), respectable and dependable bar none!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Thinking about the Shooting Community at large,I'm truly looking forward what positive impact Leupold will have now with the Redfield line on board.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I can not imagine the Redfield line not honoring their commitment to quality as a part of the Leupold company. Assuming it will be a price point oriented product aimed at the segment below the VX-2, VX-3, and up, don't expect the Hubble Telescope or "better" than a Leupold of comparable price. I think the Rifleman series Leupold is a nearing piece of junk status with 1/2 MOA friction stops and not having fully multicoated lenses.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

WAM

The Old Guard at Redfield had burned so many, it would sink any buyer! When I talked to the Gentleman at Leupold, the closest they could come is the trade in program basically trading your old Redfield for a Leupold product like you would a car. For those of us who got the shaft from Redfield, you got to give Leupold great credit for having this program. I've decided to take them up on it very soon. Of all the optical companies, Leupold is the only one I know of with true backbone!! Don't know about Sightron yet, one day I will find out

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Bottom line

With Leupold owning Redfield lock stock and barrel, I wouldn't give it a second thought in buying a Redfield now!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave,
When you go to the shot show check out the booth with the Kruger rifle scopes. I just read an e-mail from 'The Shooting Wire' from Jim Sheppard with info including them. These scopes are also assembled in Oregon with parts made overseas.
I've never heard of Kruger.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Clay

The Sightron may not have to go back for exchange! The local gun store says they have not had one come back yet.

There are plenty of good scopes out there if you don't want a Redfield. I noticed that there were no fixed power scopes in their lineup? Just because they are new and every rag is buzzing over them doesn't mean I want to run out and buy one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I should add, it too is a mid-priced scope ($180) as the Redfield.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

WAM

Your absolutely right about Sightron, just haven't had the chance to hit the "TEST BUTTON" yet and don't have reason to do it LOL!

A very good friend who owns Mossy Point Outfitter in Van Buren Arkansas who turned me onto Sightron. The only thing I don't like about the Sightron is the lenses are not recessed like the Leupold making them more vulnerable to damage.

The bottom line

These two optical companies Leupold and Sightron will be dueling it out soon if not already and Leupold better wake up!!!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

There seems to be a lot of competition for the $150 to $200 price point market. Leupold is sort of out of that range with all but the Rifleman series.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I mentioned in my earlier post that Bushnell was replacing my 3200 Elite due to fogging in the wet weather in the Pacific Northwest.

A hunting buddy has a Sightron that is only 2 years old. He doesn't hunt nearly as hard as I do, nor take the off beaten trails nor hunt nearly as many days as I do, yet his scope fogged up this year. So his Sightron didn't hold up even half the time or trauma as my Bushnell. In my book, Sightron has been tested -- I guess for my buddy, the real test is what kind of warranty they've got!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

For those reasons, I always take a backup rifle on any hunt more than 10 miles from the house. A Swarovski, Zeiss, Leupold, blah blah blah, Unlimited Lifetime of Your Grandchildren's Children Full Replacement Warranty with complimentary Mexican Dinner for four certificate wil not save your hunt if you scope rolls snake eyes and goes belly up. I have never had a scope fog or lose zero, but then again I don't own any junk either. :-)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter

For the price you pay for these other scopes, they should come with a complimentary Mexican Dinner for four!

But your absolutely right about a back up rifle.In Alaska, I had my M1 Garand broke down and carried it in my ATV rear rack storage. I never had to resort to it, but a few friends and other in my camp had to barrow Old Faithful and they had everything from Tasco to Bushnell to Leupold to Swarovski and Zeiss. I don't care what you have, it's a question of when, not if!!! And if you don't, count your blessings. Quality is one thing, Warranty backs that quality!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

The rings of gold don;t mean a darn thing only looks. I;ve said a zillion times, buy a Nikon and be happy and forget the gogging up, unless a foggy AM. Also, for cheaper line of scopes the Bushnell Dawn to Dusk in 6" ryr relief is a jewel, especially at it's price range. I put one on a guy I planned to sell and ws most impressed with the clarity and the eye focus piece not to mention the gret eye relief. I was so thrilled with it, I added one to a Black Power gun I wanted to try out, it worked like a jewel and nevr broke the bank. The eye piece worked like a telescope and the exra light at dDawn/Dusk ws better tthan any Lwupold I evr shot. With the 6" eye relief, you can mount the scope about anyway you please and it gives a clear view and with all the winter cloths on you don;t have to shift and plae the but end just right to gt a full scope view.I had on so many cloths I had to move my Nikon scopes back l/2" in order to gt a full view. But I'm old amd wear many extra cloths that this younget generation don;t appear to need.

WAMthnunter: I never made it wet,glad i did not, but got a monster here at home. A huge l0 pointer with largest body i ever saw on a W-tail in any place. Took 3 of us to load, as he hit the scales at 290 lbs and I shot him with a black Power gun at l70 yds just behind the right foreleg. Needless to say, right quarter and par of the left wuarter gone. Those Powerbelt pointed do a number. I had the gun zeroed at200 yds and it hit the aiming point perfect. Sure hope this guy left many genes before he checked out,.How did you do in C0? On same farm, Son killed 2- 8's and a 7 ( eight eith l broken tie off). With cost of hunting out west, appears now unless I get a freebee i will just have to hunt here. As can;t affford the high cost of tags, plane fares and motels. Would like one lst hunt to MT of C0 while able to go, but at 74, few huntds left. A 3-4 wek trip about does me in. I need about 2-3 other guys to go and lets drive out. We got all the camping gear, would be fun to do again I think. Nothing like bull shitting around a big rolling fire after a successful day. Shoot-up-straight and often.

Question: A Powerbelt or any hollow point Sabot,zeroed in for 200 yds, how much rise above the bulls eye will a pointed Powerbelt rise using the same wt bullet? i say 6-8" but gonna try soon as warms up. Got a new gun got to try out. Another B/P with switchable bbls. A bunch of us in the area, gonna begin Coyote hunting soon, what is best call for them? I'm told a rabbitt is best? What you guys say?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

Gunslinger

Glad to see you back on the blog! I did not even see an elk standing on his own four feet. Our group got 3 cows, but no bulls. The weather was too nice and the lack of hunting pressure and the weather obviously kept the elk way up high or places unbeknownst to us. I only saw one buck worth shooting, but since I did not buy a deer license that was not an option. I figured that since I didn't have a deer tag that I would see the B&C monster of a lifetime. The owner saw 3 nice bucks after the last season closed. Maybe they will survive the winter, cougars, and poachers until October!

Congratulations on your nice buck! You did not miss one thing in rifle seasons in Colorado. Terrible year for hunting, good year for camping.

Best regards
WMH

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

WAAMtHunter:
Too bad on a lousy seson in CO. Know the feeling. IN 97 I killed a 6 x 6 on 4th day for a l2 day handicapped hunt, then bck in 98 and hunted same area, never saw the first live elk. We had a good seson here. After i got my monster l0 and a Monster for this area, I kinda just took it easy. Never saw a thing better. Dod see a few buck and almost strtd to try my pistol on a cow howned tht needed takig out, but ws late o Sat Pm and I wanted to go eat a juicy steak. Son did well. W about to get the culls out of the herd now, a few left. Nw wish had shot sat the cow horn with the pistol to see if culd kill one. So after you uneventful seasonin Co. glad i saved my $, now maybe can go next year , would like the rut season for B/P as got a B/P on order from CVA a deletedmodel. Waned a Conteder, but a tad rich for a gu like that. Im no Jim Shockley, not planning to hu t entrely with a b/P gun. I like that option for a 2nd shot. HAs been cold as well diger's A== here and had the deepest snow in l4 yrs.(22 days temps never got above 30 deg) Still some o north banks. Had my fill of now fora year. ready for weather to warm up and try my firt ever coyote hunt.Got to get the 270 zeroed and some reloads of about 80 grs . So till get out again, wll read and watch DCD on hunts. Take care and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

WAAMtHunter:
Too bad on a lousy seson in CO. Know the feeling. IN 97 I killed a 6 x 6 on 4th day for a l2 day handicapped hunt, then bck in 98 and hunted same area, never saw the first live elk. We had a good seson here. After i got my monster l0 and a Monster for this area, I kinda just took it easy. Never saw a thing better. Dod see a few buck and almost strtd to try my pistol on a cow howned tht needed takig out, but ws late o Sat Pm and I wanted to go eat a juicy steak. Son did well. W about to get the culls out of the herd now, a few left. Nw wish had shot sat the cow horn with the pistol to see if culd kill one. So after you uneventful seasonin Co. glad i saved my $, now maybe can go next year , would like the rut season for B/P as got a B/P on order from CVA a deletedmodel. Waned a Conteder, but a tad rich for a gu like that. Im no Jim Shockley, not planning to hu t entrely with a b/P gun. I like that option for a 2nd shot. HAs been cold as well diger's A== here and had the deepest snow in l4 yrs.(22 days temps never got above 30 deg) Still some o north banks. Had my fill of now fora year. ready for weather to warm up and try my firt ever coyote hunt.Got to get the 270 zeroed and some reloads of about 80 grs . So till get out again, wll read and watch DCD on hunts. Take care and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from alabamariverman wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

The reviews are on target. I have in my possesion a new Redfield 2-9 x 40 with the new Accuplex reticle. I mounted it on a Stag Arms .223 Black Rifle and sighted in with a lazer boresighter. It only took 5 shots to bring to zero. got still and fired a .25" group with handloads. This scope is very clear and stays clear throughout magnification range. I look forward to more range time with this new glass. I have not compared it my Leupolds yet in low light but it shoots great on the range.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

Gunslinger

Congratulations on your deer! I think you folks have all our winter weather this year. It has been too warm here and the goose and duck hunting has been less than great this year. I have only killed 16 snow geese and 1 duck so far this year. Got enough for a pretty good mess of jerky.

Take care,
WMH

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from waymore wrote 2 years 17 weeks ago

redfields wide angle scopes are great...i dont see any
in the new product line...i still have 4 rifles with these installed, they are very fast to target.try a
2x7 wide angle on a mini 14....hope the wide angles will be made again..

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Firehunter wrote 2 years 16 weeks ago

Got the 4-12x40. Love IT!! Put it on a .17 hmr barrel on my T/C Encore. What a great combination. I have several Leupold VXI's and a Leupold Ultimate slam on my muzzle loader and this new Redfield is right in line with the Leupolds.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Iron Ranger wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Sure wish Redfield would get rid of the logo on the side of the scope. My rifles will never see a Redfield until they do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeep57 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

I just recently bought a 3x9 and mounted it on a Model 788 30-30. It's very accurate and the adjustments are precise.

Glad to see it back
Thanks
Jeep 57

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RGJZ06 wrote 2 years 9 weeks ago

I had a Redfield 2 power on a Model 37 12 ga. Deerslayer. It stood up to the big power of the 12 with slugs for years. I loved the scope and glad they are back if only in name. Having Leupold behind that name speaks volumns of the quality and will be covered forever.
RGJ

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 9 weeks ago

The red R looks a little funky, but a little black Sharpie can fix that little pimple! LOL

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from GunNut wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

I'm hoping to put a 2-7x33 redfield scope with the 4-plex reticle on my model 88 .358 winchester. Mr. Petzal, and anyone else who would like to answer, do you think this is a wise choice?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ikocan wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

this is nice post

makyaj ve kozmetik

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from borrath wrote 1 year 4 weeks ago

The redfield scopes are verry nice.

iddaa tahminleri

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

During the 80's Redfield constantly screwed the owners by not holding up to their lifetime warranty. So for two reasons quality and service after the sale fail!

Warranty Information

When Leupold purchased Redfield in April, 2008, Leupold did not assume the Redfield warranty. Because many Redfield customers have contacted Leupold with regard to the former Redfield warranty, Leupold is making this information available to Redfield optics owners.

At this time, three Redfield repair facilities are available should your Redfield product require service: Parson's Scope Service (513-867-0820), ABO USA Inc (305-859-2010) and Iron Sight Inc. (918-445-2001). The contacts provided are for information purposes only, as these companies are not affiliated with Leupold & Stevens. Please contact them for all information regarding repair, service, and associated charges.

As a courtesy we are now offering 20% off the price of a new Leupold scope, up to $100, in trade for any defective Redfield scope. If you would like to take us up on that offer you may call us at 1-800-LEUPOLD.

Bottom line

If your a Redfield owner like me, your screwed!

+8 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Many individuals, organizations, manufactureers and companys that start off as innovative and making a real differance in their sector, often decline and crumble. Nevertheless, they make a mark and pave some ground for those that follow. It actually makes me feel good that Leupold, which is on "top of the heap", is showing this kind of honor to the champion that went before. Kudos

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave,

I'm attendend a dealer show with Ms. Beekeeper as I type. Just visited with the Redfield folks and they are selling well. Sales guy said the scopes were the basic equal of the VARI-X I. I like the looks of them. You are right, no frills except the for the Accu-
Range Reticle. But, as they say the fancier the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the drain!

Look out for higher gun prices this year. Big Green was through the roof, as were several others...

Thought I had found a little 28 GA but alas it will require delivery of the first born. A little late for that so I had to pass. Still hope for you young fellows out there...

Another sad note, it appears the slow economy has done away with a great many of the booth babes...

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Regarding ABO USA Inc., they did manage to repair a separated reticle in my old Redfield, but their cost was
a little steep for the value received, IMHO. Also, they took an excessively long time to complete the repair and return the scope, and of course, there was the mandatory letter a month after they received the scope recommending more service at more cost. I won't use this vendor again.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

There are those who will spend a dime to make a dollar, those are the one are successful. For Leupold, they did just that and the results was not just making that additional 90 cents on that dime, they earned a respect bar none which is priceless!

As for those who will save a dime and loose a dollar? GO FIGURE!

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Now if Chevrolet would follow this example! Another story for another day!

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have had only one issue with a Leupold scope. When I put the 3.5 X 10 VariX III on my .338, it did not have enough elevation adjustment to get a 200 yd. zero. After consulting the dealer, he called, and Leupold's factory rep said "Give him a new scope, send me the old scope, and I will replace the scope you give to the customer."
This was over the phone! Pretty good attitude of standing behind your product, so if Leupold is backing the Redfield line, I would try one of the NEW Redfields if I come to need a new scope.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from wingshooter54 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Way back in my sophomore year of college, I acquired one of the first Ruger Model 77's in 7x57 to hit Carter's Country in Houston, Texas. (I had read too much Jack O'Connor and W.D.M. Bell) The rifle took most of my mad money, and all I could afford was a Redfield 4x with duplex reticle. (after all, 4x was all Jack used on his beloved 270 and Bell used open sights) For many years that was my only rifle, accounting for Texas whitetails, a few exotics, and pronghorn antelope. Having one of the early Ruger barrels, the best it ever grouped was 1.5" for 3 shots at 100 yards. However, it would place the first shot from a cold barrel exactly 3 inches high every single time. Hunting in the Texas hill country once, a loose rock on a hillside put me flat on my back and ass and I slid a hundred feet or so down the hillside. The Ruger had some serious scratches and gouges in the wood, (it was between me and the rocks)the recoil pad was cracked loose on one side, and the Redfield looked like it had been worked over with a wire brush. Getting back to camp, it put the first shot exactly 3" high like it always had which is a testament to the Ruger ring mounting sytem and a tough as nails scope. I sure as hell wish I still had that rifle and scope.

+5 Good Comment? | | Report
from .88Mag wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

"The re-born Redfields are made in Oregon, which is part of the United States."

There are times, I would say, that those living in the Peoples Republic of Portland would hate to hear those words.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

The new Redfield scopes are manufactured in the Leupold plant in Oregon and carry a forever warranty. If Leupold is backing them, I'd say that warranty is good.

Also, I've seen some of the models available through midswayusa.com. I'll be sticking one on a gun for my son's first deer season next year.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I had a Redfield 4x on a marlin 30/30 when I was in high school. Around here at that time that was about as good as a youngster could ever hope for.

Maybe the time has come for their resurgence. MADE IN USA - God bless 'em!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Forever warranty. Made in America. If the quality is as good as described from this and other reviews I may not buy another Nikon.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from rlriggins wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

In 1978 I bought a Ruger M77 in .270 and mounted a 2X7 Redfield scope. For over 25 years that was my go to rig. One year I fell part way down an Idaho mountain banging the scope so hard that the windage cap was jammed onto the scope and had to be removed with pliers. I checked the sighting which was still very close and used the rig the next day to take a nice 5X5 bull elk. The last few years the scope has topped my muzzleloader and is still doing the job as well as ever. For us older shooters who watched Redfield scopes go from excellent to junk it is nice to see the Redfield name once again on a quality scope. The fact they are Made In The USA only makes that sweeter yet.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Beekeeper: That is bitter news about the booth babes. I have to go to SHOT anyay.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from auburn_hunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave -

How would you rate this re-vamped Redfield as compared to the Weaver 40/44 that F&S rated so highly last year (for an "budget-conscious" scope)? Thanks.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave:

Sounds like an article: "Can you get a decent scope for under $200?" Be fun to get a $200 Weaver or one of these Redfields, stick it on a $300 Marlin or $400 Mossberg or Savage with Weaver mounts, and get in some range time.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from davidpetzal wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

To auburn_hunter: Don't know, because the Redfield is a completely new scope and I like to keep them in use for a year or so before I make pronouncements like that. I've never had a problem with one of the new Weavers.

To Walt Smith: Endorsement deal? Where? Who do I contact?

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I certainly like my Sightron S-II. That big red R on the right side of the Redfield objective bell is fugly.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I remember back in June of 87 in Alaska, my Redfield Widefield 3x9 fogged up while hunting. I remembered back the summer of 1968 my Father purchased several Redfield Widefield 3x9’s keeping two and giving the rest to other friends. He put one on his Remington Model 721 which is still there today and the other on my 03-A3 during the final Custom job. I mailed the warranty card in and remembering the Life Time Warranty and really believed I had a quality Scope for life. Back to June 87, I sent the scope back to Redfield still in good working order and when I received it back, the invoice said the scope was too old and when I pulled the scope out of the box, the locking ring on the rear eye peace was broken and was barley screwed on with what nitrogen that remain was gone. I called Redfield and the Manager said for X-amount of dollars I could trade the scope in and what happened to my scope was too bad! I went back and forth with Redfield for two months, went ahead and traded the scope in for a rebuilt then it was payback time. Not only I was on the Air Force High Power Team, I ran the Base Range for recreational shooting, The Director for High Power Competition for the Tanana Valley Sportsmen Association and the President of the Sportsmen Council for the BX at Eielson and did I put the news out about Redfield. In fact, the sales and presence of Redfields became really scarce and the only one you came across was those who brought them in from the lower 48. The #1 by far the biggest bang for the buck and service after the sales in central Alaska was Leupold. They flat out stood behind there warranty! Not only that, one had a really bad fall sheep hunting totaling the Leuplold 3x9x40 Vari-X II. It looked like a bulldozer ran across it and backed up over twice! The owner showed it to me at the range and wanted to know if Leupold would fix it? Man, I really don’t think so, but he sent it in anyhow. Because the front bell was bent at the tube, they warranted it, NO JOKE! Because of that, Leupold became the #1 scope in the Fairbanks area.

I’m glad to see Redfield out of business for all they have done to the shooting public and glad to see a reputable optical company such as Leupold to take it over, a company I know for a fact who will be there tomorrow!!!!!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

With any merger, for the better company weeds out those of the other company like eradicating a cancer and make sure they are directly within the standards of the better.

I've witnessed Company mergers and within a year, the cancer/virus (people) who brought the other company to its knees has effected the entire company bringing it down!

Leupold I say to you, beware!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from albertahunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I bot a Redfield illuminator 3x9 top of the line over 30 years ago for my 300Win magnum. Incredible then and still great. Range finder and drop comp are extremely accurate and have worked flawlessly. I have been looking for years for used ones for my other guns but obviously everyone keeps them or passes them down as they are rare or over priced. Just getting bit old for the kick of the 300 but the memories.............

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

We all thought for years that Weaver scopes was the scope to buy,wrong,they so out priced and out qualified now that the cheapo Simmons is equal to them and I got a 4 and a 6 power Weaver that both are over 55 ys old. O tey ok to100 yds for late Am to early PM, but the multi-coated lenses now will do a much better job. I feel we gonna see a new round of B/P guns soon, these with he levr on the trigger guard will be shot lived.You will see some with the lever on top ( as our old faithful single shots had), which I call break-action, not levr action. ASk Mr. Knight about the newer batch of Knight B/P, Noticed Jim Shockley has switched to T/C, wonder how much T/P paid him? no doubt T/C a great rifle, I like a B/P Enscore myself with some extra bbls.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Gunslinger

O’Yes Weaver Scopes another company here today and to be sold off tomorrow! Two brand of scopes I will not but, Weaver and Redfield. Both burned me and my friends to the 4th degree they did!!!

With Leupold owning Redfield what guarantee will I have in buying another Redfield. Is the “OLD GUARD” still at or will they resurface later at the helm at Redfield?!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I'm glad to see an affordable, quality scope being made in the USA. Hats of to Leupold for their VX I, and now for Redfields. I'm also glad to see some enthusiasm for "made in America" products. Sure German and Japanese scopes are nice, but so are American ones, and our country needs the business a helluva lot more than they do. Hopefully this trend continues. I've never owned a Redfield, but I'll definitely take a good hard look at them the next time I need a scope.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

My son still has a Redfied Widefield 2-7x on his 7mm Rem Mag that I took off my M-700 .35 Whelen many years ago. I had recycled it off a Savage 99, for which it was way out of proportion. I also had a 4x Redfield that got sold with another rifle that I wish I still had.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Great to see the Redfield line back in business. I still
have one functional 3 X 9 Widefield in service, and still remember a 2 X 7 on a .30-'06 that accounted for a number of deer, hogs and coyotes. Is there any mention of bring back the Widefield?

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bernie wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have a couple 4X Redfields, one a Traditional from 1968, the other a Widefield from about 1971. I also have a 6X Widefield from 1971 or so. None has ever given me a problem. I am glad that I missed the decline in quality that ensued in later years, but I remember it well when many hunters were dissatisfied with Redfield.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

vtbluegrass quote "Forever warranty. Made in America. If the quality is as good as described from this and other reviews I may not buy another Nikon."

I'm sure that's what Leupold is hoping for......

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Glad to hear about this!! I will get one ASAP.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Hey Bee,

You already have your booth babe!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from 007 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have one of the old Redfield 3x9's with the TV screen reticle on my 7mm Remington magnum, and it still works just fine. A Redfield 2x7 might be just the ticket for my .35 Remington as well. Well done, Leupold, and thanks.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I still use my old Redfield Widefield Accu-Trac 3-9X on my Winchester Model 70. You all may remember that Redfield was one of the original scopes to use 2 stadia wire to bracket the deer's brisket to determine distance. Then one just dials in the Accu-Trac knob (elevation adjustment) for the proper yards. It has accounted for many deer.
I sent it to the last company who tried to make a go of the Redfield name and they offered me a so-called deal to buy up to one of their name scopes. If I declined, it was an 8 - 10 week wait for my original Redfield to be serviced. I told them "no thanks, I'll wait 8 - 10 weeks!"
It is not as good in low light as some of the new scopes but I can see well enough to shoot in the last few minutes of legal shooting light.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Someday Dave will admit that Sightron is as good as anything out there. Of course that will cost a few endorsement deals!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I have an old Redfield widefield 3-9 i plan on putting on my new rifle. There is no shortage of old ones on Ebay either, still commanding decent money. Glad to see an icon reborn. Glad they are in the affordable quality bracket, I may actually buy one.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

i was gonna get a decently priced scope for my model 99 savage but i would like to see the quality and support offered from redfield or leupold before i pick up one of them. waiting to hear how they are. dave, you are going to be held personally responsible if the booth babes are not present at SHOT! get on it and don't let us down!!!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Just thought I'd let everybody know that Bushnell has done me right by replacing the 3200 that I bought 5+/- years ago! The original scope was not expensive (as scopes go) but it was bright and served very well up 'til now-- even in the most rainy of the Pacific Northwest's weather!

And the Booth Babe discussion is on again. I love this time of year! I get to provoke whoever will read my posts to "love and good deeds"!

As hunters, we expect nothing less than a solid hunting ethic from our online field and stream posters and regularly encourage each other to "do right" in the field. Even though we highly value hunting, I would propose to all that one's marriage and family are really far more valuable and important. Our behavior should be governed by an ethic that honors our wives, protects our children and guards our hearts when tempted to break our commitments of fidelity. Anything else is poaching.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from blueridge wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Clay and Ralph...
Had my own warranty problems with Redfield. Fogged scope, one of my favorites. Sent to Redfield for repair, it was sent back, with a similar nasty marketing note, that you too, for big bucks, could purchase another Redfield. Warranty was not in their vocab.

Will not own, purchase, or borrow another Redfield.

Blue

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntenthusiest wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

A few years back I picked up a S&W Model A in 30-06 from a retired doctor. It's got a 3-9 Widefield that's handsome and accurate as is the rifle.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I mentioned in my earlier post that Bushnell was replacing my 3200 Elite due to fogging in the wet weather in the Pacific Northwest.

A hunting buddy has a Sightron that is only 2 years old. He doesn't hunt nearly as hard as I do, nor take the off beaten trails nor hunt nearly as many days as I do, yet his scope fogged up this year. So his Sightron didn't hold up even half the time or trauma as my Bushnell. In my book, Sightron has been tested -- I guess for my buddy, the real test is what kind of warranty they've got!

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I thought they were going to come back in on the high end. Guess that didn't figure into Leupold's business model. Oh, well. Good to have the name back, but what next? Ramp upscale? Or replace Leupold low end models?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 86Ram wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I mentioned this back in the answers section a few weeks ago lol... Leupold brings back Redfield Scopes

Anyways, I own a Redfield Partner II..bought it in 96
Great scope.

I'm glad to see the scopes rebirth and still being made in the USA and by a reputable company in its own right.
My hats off to leupold.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Speaking of quality scopes, anyone have any experience with Kahles Helia series riflescopes?

I know they are a bit pricey, but I may have a chance to pick up one at a good price from a private sale.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from JCB wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Good move by Leopold. Use the Redfield name, that is all ready known in the trade, to market a lower priced scope of good quality. The Leopold name stays on the higher end line. They bring a scope to market that is made in the USA and beats back the China junk. Go Leopold and Redfield!! Buy American!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

My Redfield scope, 1970's vintage, was a sorry example to keep and I sold it...bad memories of opening day "fogging". The prices seem reasonable?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I love my VXIII Leupolds but if this new Bushnell 6500 Elite I just bought turns out as good as Dave says Bushnell will become my new brand.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from duckcreekdick wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I still have my Redfield 6X18 on my Remington 700 Varmint Special in .308. Cutting edge back in 1976 when I carried that package up to Alaska.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from yeloston wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Does anyone know where I can find see-thru scope caps to fit my Redfield Widefield 3-9?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

yeloston

That's a very good question and I haven't seen any

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

yeloston,
The last see-thru scope covers I saw was made or at least sold by Leopold if memory serves. It should fit your scope after all 40mm is 40mm, right? I'd call them.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from cverstrate wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I've got a 3x9 Redfield low profile widefield scope circa 70's or 80's on my 30-.06 and have been nothing but happy. Welcome back Redfield.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

FYI, I sent an Email to Leupold Sales to invite them to respond to all of this. Guess will see what happens, but I'm not holding my breath. I hope I'm wrong

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Beekeeper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Carney,

My mention of the "Booth Babes" or "Booth Bait" as my wife calls them was merely a comedic attempt to reflect the facts of our rough economic times. Said times have forced companies to cut down on extravagance including the freebies they used to give away and which I greatly enjoyed. As WMH stated, I already have my "Babe"!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

If there are slim pickin's at SHOT, maybe R. Lee Ermy can yell at Mr. Petzal a time or two to get him calibrated! LOL

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

As a lot of you know, I don’t shy away from telling the truth. I just got off the phone with Leupold and had a somewhat lengthy conversation.

So here is the Scoop from the Coop!

After my conversation with Leupold and Redfield is now owned, managed, operated and carry the same Leupold warranty, I have made the decision to remove Redfield off my “BLACK LIST” and put them and refer to them as the Leupold line (Family), respectable and dependable bar none!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Thinking about the Shooting Community at large,I'm truly looking forward what positive impact Leupold will have now with the Redfield line on board.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I can not imagine the Redfield line not honoring their commitment to quality as a part of the Leupold company. Assuming it will be a price point oriented product aimed at the segment below the VX-2, VX-3, and up, don't expect the Hubble Telescope or "better" than a Leupold of comparable price. I think the Rifleman series Leupold is a nearing piece of junk status with 1/2 MOA friction stops and not having fully multicoated lenses.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

WAM

The Old Guard at Redfield had burned so many, it would sink any buyer! When I talked to the Gentleman at Leupold, the closest they could come is the trade in program basically trading your old Redfield for a Leupold product like you would a car. For those of us who got the shaft from Redfield, you got to give Leupold great credit for having this program. I've decided to take them up on it very soon. Of all the optical companies, Leupold is the only one I know of with true backbone!! Don't know about Sightron yet, one day I will find out

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Bottom line

With Leupold owning Redfield lock stock and barrel, I wouldn't give it a second thought in buying a Redfield now!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Dave,
When you go to the shot show check out the booth with the Kruger rifle scopes. I just read an e-mail from 'The Shooting Wire' from Jim Sheppard with info including them. These scopes are also assembled in Oregon with parts made overseas.
I've never heard of Kruger.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

WAM

Your absolutely right about Sightron, just haven't had the chance to hit the "TEST BUTTON" yet and don't have reason to do it LOL!

A very good friend who owns Mossy Point Outfitter in Van Buren Arkansas who turned me onto Sightron. The only thing I don't like about the Sightron is the lenses are not recessed like the Leupold making them more vulnerable to damage.

The bottom line

These two optical companies Leupold and Sightron will be dueling it out soon if not already and Leupold better wake up!!!!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

There seems to be a lot of competition for the $150 to $200 price point market. Leupold is sort of out of that range with all but the Rifleman series.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

For those reasons, I always take a backup rifle on any hunt more than 10 miles from the house. A Swarovski, Zeiss, Leupold, blah blah blah, Unlimited Lifetime of Your Grandchildren's Children Full Replacement Warranty with complimentary Mexican Dinner for four certificate wil not save your hunt if you scope rolls snake eyes and goes belly up. I have never had a scope fog or lose zero, but then again I don't own any junk either. :-)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

WA Mtnhunter

For the price you pay for these other scopes, they should come with a complimentary Mexican Dinner for four!

But your absolutely right about a back up rifle.In Alaska, I had my M1 Garand broke down and carried it in my ATV rear rack storage. I never had to resort to it, but a few friends and other in my camp had to barrow Old Faithful and they had everything from Tasco to Bushnell to Leupold to Swarovski and Zeiss. I don't care what you have, it's a question of when, not if!!! And if you don't, count your blessings. Quality is one thing, Warranty backs that quality!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from waymore wrote 2 years 17 weeks ago

redfields wide angle scopes are great...i dont see any
in the new product line...i still have 4 rifles with these installed, they are very fast to target.try a
2x7 wide angle on a mini 14....hope the wide angles will be made again..

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Del,
I have two Bushnell 6500 Elites - a 4x30 mil-dot and a 2.5x16 mil-dot. The 4x30 is still growing on me but the 2.5x16 is ALL THAT. I am impressed. To my eyes it compares quite favorably to my Dad's Swarovski 4x12x50 with his having an ever so slight edge at near-dark. It ought to for the $$$.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

Clay

The Sightron may not have to go back for exchange! The local gun store says they have not had one come back yet.

There are plenty of good scopes out there if you don't want a Redfield. I noticed that there were no fixed power scopes in their lineup? Just because they are new and every rag is buzzing over them doesn't mean I want to run out and buy one.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jim in Mo wrote 2 years 19 weeks ago

I should add, it too is a mid-priced scope ($180) as the Redfield.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

The rings of gold don;t mean a darn thing only looks. I;ve said a zillion times, buy a Nikon and be happy and forget the gogging up, unless a foggy AM. Also, for cheaper line of scopes the Bushnell Dawn to Dusk in 6" ryr relief is a jewel, especially at it's price range. I put one on a guy I planned to sell and ws most impressed with the clarity and the eye focus piece not to mention the gret eye relief. I was so thrilled with it, I added one to a Black Power gun I wanted to try out, it worked like a jewel and nevr broke the bank. The eye piece worked like a telescope and the exra light at dDawn/Dusk ws better tthan any Lwupold I evr shot. With the 6" eye relief, you can mount the scope about anyway you please and it gives a clear view and with all the winter cloths on you don;t have to shift and plae the but end just right to gt a full scope view.I had on so many cloths I had to move my Nikon scopes back l/2" in order to gt a full view. But I'm old amd wear many extra cloths that this younget generation don;t appear to need.

WAMthnunter: I never made it wet,glad i did not, but got a monster here at home. A huge l0 pointer with largest body i ever saw on a W-tail in any place. Took 3 of us to load, as he hit the scales at 290 lbs and I shot him with a black Power gun at l70 yds just behind the right foreleg. Needless to say, right quarter and par of the left wuarter gone. Those Powerbelt pointed do a number. I had the gun zeroed at200 yds and it hit the aiming point perfect. Sure hope this guy left many genes before he checked out,.How did you do in C0? On same farm, Son killed 2- 8's and a 7 ( eight eith l broken tie off). With cost of hunting out west, appears now unless I get a freebee i will just have to hunt here. As can;t affford the high cost of tags, plane fares and motels. Would like one lst hunt to MT of C0 while able to go, but at 74, few huntds left. A 3-4 wek trip about does me in. I need about 2-3 other guys to go and lets drive out. We got all the camping gear, would be fun to do again I think. Nothing like bull shitting around a big rolling fire after a successful day. Shoot-up-straight and often.

Question: A Powerbelt or any hollow point Sabot,zeroed in for 200 yds, how much rise above the bulls eye will a pointed Powerbelt rise using the same wt bullet? i say 6-8" but gonna try soon as warms up. Got a new gun got to try out. Another B/P with switchable bbls. A bunch of us in the area, gonna begin Coyote hunting soon, what is best call for them? I'm told a rabbitt is best? What you guys say?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

Gunslinger

Glad to see you back on the blog! I did not even see an elk standing on his own four feet. Our group got 3 cows, but no bulls. The weather was too nice and the lack of hunting pressure and the weather obviously kept the elk way up high or places unbeknownst to us. I only saw one buck worth shooting, but since I did not buy a deer license that was not an option. I figured that since I didn't have a deer tag that I would see the B&C monster of a lifetime. The owner saw 3 nice bucks after the last season closed. Maybe they will survive the winter, cougars, and poachers until October!

Congratulations on your nice buck! You did not miss one thing in rifle seasons in Colorado. Terrible year for hunting, good year for camping.

Best regards
WMH

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

WAAMtHunter:
Too bad on a lousy seson in CO. Know the feeling. IN 97 I killed a 6 x 6 on 4th day for a l2 day handicapped hunt, then bck in 98 and hunted same area, never saw the first live elk. We had a good seson here. After i got my monster l0 and a Monster for this area, I kinda just took it easy. Never saw a thing better. Dod see a few buck and almost strtd to try my pistol on a cow howned tht needed takig out, but ws late o Sat Pm and I wanted to go eat a juicy steak. Son did well. W about to get the culls out of the herd now, a few left. Nw wish had shot sat the cow horn with the pistol to see if culd kill one. So after you uneventful seasonin Co. glad i saved my $, now maybe can go next year , would like the rut season for B/P as got a B/P on order from CVA a deletedmodel. Waned a Conteder, but a tad rich for a gu like that. Im no Jim Shockley, not planning to hu t entrely with a b/P gun. I like that option for a 2nd shot. HAs been cold as well diger's A== here and had the deepest snow in l4 yrs.(22 days temps never got above 30 deg) Still some o north banks. Had my fill of now fora year. ready for weather to warm up and try my firt ever coyote hunt.Got to get the 270 zeroed and some reloads of about 80 grs . So till get out again, wll read and watch DCD on hunts. Take care and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

WAAMtHunter:
Too bad on a lousy seson in CO. Know the feeling. IN 97 I killed a 6 x 6 on 4th day for a l2 day handicapped hunt, then bck in 98 and hunted same area, never saw the first live elk. We had a good seson here. After i got my monster l0 and a Monster for this area, I kinda just took it easy. Never saw a thing better. Dod see a few buck and almost strtd to try my pistol on a cow howned tht needed takig out, but ws late o Sat Pm and I wanted to go eat a juicy steak. Son did well. W about to get the culls out of the herd now, a few left. Nw wish had shot sat the cow horn with the pistol to see if culd kill one. So after you uneventful seasonin Co. glad i saved my $, now maybe can go next year , would like the rut season for B/P as got a B/P on order from CVA a deletedmodel. Waned a Conteder, but a tad rich for a gu like that. Im no Jim Shockley, not planning to hu t entrely with a b/P gun. I like that option for a 2nd shot. HAs been cold as well diger's A== here and had the deepest snow in l4 yrs.(22 days temps never got above 30 deg) Still some o north banks. Had my fill of now fora year. ready for weather to warm up and try my firt ever coyote hunt.Got to get the 270 zeroed and some reloads of about 80 grs . So till get out again, wll read and watch DCD on hunts. Take care and often.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from alabamariverman wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

The reviews are on target. I have in my possesion a new Redfield 2-9 x 40 with the new Accuplex reticle. I mounted it on a Stag Arms .223 Black Rifle and sighted in with a lazer boresighter. It only took 5 shots to bring to zero. got still and fired a .25" group with handloads. This scope is very clear and stays clear throughout magnification range. I look forward to more range time with this new glass. I have not compared it my Leupolds yet in low light but it shoots great on the range.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 18 weeks ago

Gunslinger

Congratulations on your deer! I think you folks have all our winter weather this year. It has been too warm here and the goose and duck hunting has been less than great this year. I have only killed 16 snow geese and 1 duck so far this year. Got enough for a pretty good mess of jerky.

Take care,
WMH

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Firehunter wrote 2 years 16 weeks ago

Got the 4-12x40. Love IT!! Put it on a .17 hmr barrel on my T/C Encore. What a great combination. I have several Leupold VXI's and a Leupold Ultimate slam on my muzzle loader and this new Redfield is right in line with the Leupolds.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Iron Ranger wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

Sure wish Redfield would get rid of the logo on the side of the scope. My rifles will never see a Redfield until they do.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jeep57 wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

I just recently bought a 3x9 and mounted it on a Model 788 30-30. It's very accurate and the adjustments are precise.

Glad to see it back
Thanks
Jeep 57

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from RGJZ06 wrote 2 years 9 weeks ago

I had a Redfield 2 power on a Model 37 12 ga. Deerslayer. It stood up to the big power of the 12 with slugs for years. I loved the scope and glad they are back if only in name. Having Leupold behind that name speaks volumns of the quality and will be covered forever.
RGJ

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 9 weeks ago

The red R looks a little funky, but a little black Sharpie can fix that little pimple! LOL

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from GunNut wrote 1 year 41 weeks ago

I'm hoping to put a 2-7x33 redfield scope with the 4-plex reticle on my model 88 .358 winchester. Mr. Petzal, and anyone else who would like to answer, do you think this is a wise choice?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ikocan wrote 1 year 20 weeks ago

this is nice post

makyaj ve kozmetik

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from borrath wrote 1 year 4 weeks ago

The redfield scopes are verry nice.

iddaa tahminleri

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment