


March 29, 2011
Kansas Legislature Approves Silencer Hunting Bill
--Chad Love
If you're a Kansas resident, there could be a new sound coming soon to your neck of the woods, the sound of...silence?
From this AP story on fox4kc.com:
The Kansas Legislature has approved a bill that would allow the use of silencers for hunting, fishing and fur harvesting. The bill, supported by the National Rifle Association, is awaiting Gov. Sam Brownback's signature. The Hays Daily News reports that the bill received only one no vote in the Senate and was unanimously approved by the House last week.
Chris Tymeson, chief counsel for the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, says he doesn't know how if many people own silencers, in part because they are expensive and must be licensed by federal authorities. Owners also must undergo an FBI background check. He says a few people have filed requests with the state's wildlife agency to be able to use silencers, mainly for shooting prairie dogs.
What do you think? Good idea, bad idea or meh, who cares?
Comments (24)
I think this is a fantastic idea. Silencers (or more accurately suppressors) have a bad rap, mostly thanks to movies and TV that show them being used by all the bad guys out there and thanks to the misinformation leading people to believe they make a gunshot into a whisper. A suppressor takes a gunshot that will cause instant permanent hearing damage and turns it into something that is loud but not dangerously so (think the sound of a jackhammer) it reduces the amount of noise pollution and lets people shoot without cumbersome hearing protection. Imagine if we could have shooting ranges closer to town and if we didn’t have to choose between safety or actually being able to use one of our primary senses when hunting. I hope all states soon adopt this legislation. Good work Kansas!!
Put me down in the "Meh" category. I'm certainly not opposed to the use of suppressors because it makes a lot of sense. But as long as the federal restrictions are in place, legalizing them for hunting is mostly a symbolic thing that'll imact a small handful of hunters. It won't change a thing for the majority of us, but it certainly won't hurt anything either.
I'm fascinated by the way you guys have the most liberal gun laws, and the most ambulance chasing lawyers and yet are banned from protecting your hearing. Amazing!
SBW
In some countries overseas, its illegal to hunt without one. Buying one in this country will cost you just as much, if not more, than the gun you're putting it on.
So what your saying is that a group of friends (as long as one of them lives in Kansas and has a clean FBI record) can pool their money together and purchase a silencer, then utilize other Kansas laws to legally carry that rifle loaded and uncased in a vehicle and legally shoot from inside of it at a trophy deer, antelope, or elk (and tell the game warden you were shooting at a varmint).
Will the FBI background check cover wildlife violations.
The added ability of being quieter will sure make it easier for a poacher to cut the rack off a carcass in the field, and not worry about being caught.
Good job Kansas!!! Next year can you legalize hunting with IR night vision scope or a laser sight, because there a few people who want to use them when hunting raccoons???
Prairie dogs exist in a small portion of the state, but the new law will apply to all species statewide.
I know the majority who read this blog apply ethics and fair chase when hunting, but this law encourages neither of the two.
I guess it is still in the hands of the Kansas hunter now, who can contact their Governor and tell him to veto it unless they want it.
To Game Protector: This is part of the problem with the common misconception about silencers. They dont make the gunshot sound like anything other than a gunshot. It can still be heard from a good distance off it just isnt dangerously loud anymore. Most hunting rifles are still going to be in the 140-150 decible range. Thats plenty loud enough to let people know whats going on in the area. If poaching is a problem now its not going to become anymore of a problem because the gunshot is now just loud not inredibly loud.
Suppressors are a good thing because you don't usually need ear protection. And their called suppressors not silencers cause they suppress to gunshot.
I like suppressors, but they're not cheap.
I agree with you that a silencer or a sound suppressor does not make a gun absolutely quiet. At least not a good suppressor, yet; but whose to say that overtime the market will demand a suppressor that creates extremely low decibels while maintaining bullet velocity. It is harder to repeal a law than create one.
If current technology can suppress a .22 cal to 115 decibels, is it impossible to say that future technology can suppress it 30 more decibels (equivalent to city traffic from inside your vehicle) or further.
I support a person or a group wanting a suppressor for shooting targets or home defense, more power to them. However, I just don't see any value to using a suppressor when hunting generally, unless it is a micro-niche such as prairie dogs. That's all.
why exactly would you use a silencer while hunting? what good does it do? pointless.
perhaps you would like to do a post on the difference between supressors and silencers. there is a big difference.
amazing idea for shooting prairie dogs, or a silenced 22. for raccoons and opossums in the deer stand.
well a 338 BR with silencer and long aerodynamic bullets should be perfect for hunting goose with rifles that are silenced. and so much more ;)
silenced u can get 3-4 at a time, normally they fly away after first shot and do not come back for a long while if ever.. helps the farmers. enough said :D
GameProtector, there are plenty of ways to suppress the report of a rifle, particularly a rimfire. They're illegal as hell, as is poaching, which really means that a prohibition on suppressors has no impact on lawbreakers, and every impact on legitimate hunters. The lawbreakers already have their own means to detour around the law. That's what they do. They break the law.
There are people who argue that certain, semi-automatic firearms are widely used to commit crimes, and that the best way to moderate those crimes is to ban those semi-automatic firearms. Apparently, by making it easier to commit a crime, possession of these firearms makes us more likely to become criminals. Our society must, therefore, be safer if those firearms are out of our hands.
At my new job there is another teacher who is hunter from Scotland and about a week ago we got to talking about hunting. In his homeland suppressors are used to cut down on noise pollution and to not bother the neighbors. However hunting with a bow is illegal, because it’s considered to be animal cruelty to kill with anything other than a bullet.
Suppressors are also legal in New Zealand. I find it amusing that other countries with whacko gun laws have no issue with suppressors while my country with relatively liberal gun laws is whacko about supressors.
I doubt if they will ever be allowed in the "good ole boy" liberal state of North Carolina.
Of course misinformation and honest ignorance about supressors are to blame for the bad rap they receive.
Game Protector,
You are a little off the mark on several things here.
- A group of people can't collectively own a silencer(suppressor - whatever), and getting together to 'buy' one would IMO constitute a straw purchase. You can go the route of a living trust or a corporation, but I think the type of folks you are talking about is not that advanced, or even concerned about legality to start with. They are already illegal when they start poaching out of a vehicle. Chances are if they are that sort of character, they couldn't get through the NFA process to obtain one anyway.
- As long as a projectile is going supersonic after leaving the barrel, there is noise downrange and in the area. A silencer has no control over that part of a fired shot. It does however, control and cool the gases from the muzzle, thus reducing the report there. Even subsonic rounds fired makes some noise suppressed.
- I do see a value for silencers in hunting. I make my living playing music, selling instruments, and installing sound systems. Anything I can do to keep what hearing I have left I am 100% for. However as a GA resident it is illegal here to use one in the act of hunting.
Jamesti,
I have to confess - I am ignorant on the difference between a silencer and a suppressor. I know folks who are manufacturers of such devices and they use the terms pretty much interchangeably. I think 'silencer' is more in the legal definition and public know, thanks to Hollywood.
As for making noise, or not making noise while hunting, I guess it's OK for my bow to be near-silent while I'm shooting something, but not(?) when I am using my rifle. I think Hollywood has cast such a negative stigma on "silencers" as a tool fit only for assassins doing wet work, lots of folks have already made up their minds before they see the bigger picture.
Game Protector,
Wasn't me who -1'd you. Hit you with a +, as we are all just voicing opinions here, not arguing or getting personal.
regards,
S Ga
Wow this turned into a great discussion. I have a question for anyone that might have experience. Do you have to do a lot of extra cleaning on a suppressor after several shots? I would think with all those baffles catching the gases you would have one heck of a mess before long.
Here in norway we have very strict laws concerning guns.. not even our police is carrying unless specially ordered by a djudge, and then full SWAT tactics are enforced.. But i was only 13 when i bought a 22 long rifle with legal silencer/suppressor (-same thing but dependant on weather the bullet traveling through them are subsonic or not since the supersonic bullets will break the sound barrier and make a bang well after leaving the barrel and suppression device) And we cant even own semiautomatic rifles that look military in origin cos of the bad reputation it could give legal hunters here among the rest of the civillian population.. resulting in that we can own a ruger mini-14 for instance but not an AR-15.. or anything that look too military.. cant use a semi with pistol grip or folding stock for hunting etc.. But we can own silencers for all legal hunting rifles if we can show any real need or use for it ;) just claiming u wanna protect your hearing is sufficient.. and what most people dont reccon in to the formula is that silencers will dampen some of the recoil of a rifle, though not as effectively as a muzzle break, then with the added bonus of not increasing noise and blast from the gun :)
Silencers are a good thing.. and i dont see why hunters would ever need to use military weapons of any kind.. (i mean modern warfare type not older mausers and garands etc.. :P )
Me im looking forward to getting a stainless mini-14 with a suppressor on it for plinking and smallgame hunting as soon as my finances clear up.. why?? cos i can ;) moahahahahaaaaa!!!!
what is next odorless shells. new completely smoke free. guns cause noise. get over it. another attempt to fix something that is not broken.
once again people wanting to restrict me because of the chance of a crime. What are you people thinking? According to your way of thinking, I should not be able to to buy a magazine with 30 rounds in it. I can have 90 ten round magazines, but not one 30 round magazine, because of the potential of maybe using it in a crime. How stupid does that sound? Has anyone on here, that is rejecting this idea, actually used a "wicked, evil spewing silencer?" I didn't think so, because it is obvious you don't know what you are talking about. They Do NOT make them SILENT! You watch too much TV, get outdoors and live a little. Go to the local gun range, use one...somebody you know has one...and then make your comment as an informed, inteligent communicator. Until then do as my Grandpaw always said, keep your mouth shut and let them THINK you are an idiot, don't open it and prove it!
WE ARE THE BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, IN ALL OF MANKINDS HISTORY. QUIT TRYING TO MESS IT UP!
yuh, best.. suuureee. thats why u have 32 million illiterate people in the us and 2 million people occupy the jails at all times and u cant legally own silencers/supressors :P
:D:D:D
Not to mention that US is turning into a third world country again :P
to: ingebrigsten, yeah you're right, that's why all of us illiterate Americans have to be deployed to countries like yours to get rid of the terrorists you don't have the balls to take down. Most of our soldiers are currently deployed in other countries, yet still no one messes with us. We ARE NATO's watchdogs, and there's a reason for it.
Post a Comment
I think this is a fantastic idea. Silencers (or more accurately suppressors) have a bad rap, mostly thanks to movies and TV that show them being used by all the bad guys out there and thanks to the misinformation leading people to believe they make a gunshot into a whisper. A suppressor takes a gunshot that will cause instant permanent hearing damage and turns it into something that is loud but not dangerously so (think the sound of a jackhammer) it reduces the amount of noise pollution and lets people shoot without cumbersome hearing protection. Imagine if we could have shooting ranges closer to town and if we didn’t have to choose between safety or actually being able to use one of our primary senses when hunting. I hope all states soon adopt this legislation. Good work Kansas!!
To Game Protector: This is part of the problem with the common misconception about silencers. They dont make the gunshot sound like anything other than a gunshot. It can still be heard from a good distance off it just isnt dangerously loud anymore. Most hunting rifles are still going to be in the 140-150 decible range. Thats plenty loud enough to let people know whats going on in the area. If poaching is a problem now its not going to become anymore of a problem because the gunshot is now just loud not inredibly loud.
I'm fascinated by the way you guys have the most liberal gun laws, and the most ambulance chasing lawyers and yet are banned from protecting your hearing. Amazing!
SBW
In some countries overseas, its illegal to hunt without one. Buying one in this country will cost you just as much, if not more, than the gun you're putting it on.
Game Protector,
You are a little off the mark on several things here.
- A group of people can't collectively own a silencer(suppressor - whatever), and getting together to 'buy' one would IMO constitute a straw purchase. You can go the route of a living trust or a corporation, but I think the type of folks you are talking about is not that advanced, or even concerned about legality to start with. They are already illegal when they start poaching out of a vehicle. Chances are if they are that sort of character, they couldn't get through the NFA process to obtain one anyway.
- As long as a projectile is going supersonic after leaving the barrel, there is noise downrange and in the area. A silencer has no control over that part of a fired shot. It does however, control and cool the gases from the muzzle, thus reducing the report there. Even subsonic rounds fired makes some noise suppressed.
- I do see a value for silencers in hunting. I make my living playing music, selling instruments, and installing sound systems. Anything I can do to keep what hearing I have left I am 100% for. However as a GA resident it is illegal here to use one in the act of hunting.
Jamesti,
I have to confess - I am ignorant on the difference between a silencer and a suppressor. I know folks who are manufacturers of such devices and they use the terms pretty much interchangeably. I think 'silencer' is more in the legal definition and public know, thanks to Hollywood.
As for making noise, or not making noise while hunting, I guess it's OK for my bow to be near-silent while I'm shooting something, but not(?) when I am using my rifle. I think Hollywood has cast such a negative stigma on "silencers" as a tool fit only for assassins doing wet work, lots of folks have already made up their minds before they see the bigger picture.
Suppressors are a good thing because you don't usually need ear protection. And their called suppressors not silencers cause they suppress to gunshot.
I like suppressors, but they're not cheap.
I agree with you that a silencer or a sound suppressor does not make a gun absolutely quiet. At least not a good suppressor, yet; but whose to say that overtime the market will demand a suppressor that creates extremely low decibels while maintaining bullet velocity. It is harder to repeal a law than create one.
If current technology can suppress a .22 cal to 115 decibels, is it impossible to say that future technology can suppress it 30 more decibels (equivalent to city traffic from inside your vehicle) or further.
I support a person or a group wanting a suppressor for shooting targets or home defense, more power to them. However, I just don't see any value to using a suppressor when hunting generally, unless it is a micro-niche such as prairie dogs. That's all.
why exactly would you use a silencer while hunting? what good does it do? pointless.
perhaps you would like to do a post on the difference between supressors and silencers. there is a big difference.
amazing idea for shooting prairie dogs, or a silenced 22. for raccoons and opossums in the deer stand.
well a 338 BR with silencer and long aerodynamic bullets should be perfect for hunting goose with rifles that are silenced. and so much more ;)
silenced u can get 3-4 at a time, normally they fly away after first shot and do not come back for a long while if ever.. helps the farmers. enough said :D
GameProtector, there are plenty of ways to suppress the report of a rifle, particularly a rimfire. They're illegal as hell, as is poaching, which really means that a prohibition on suppressors has no impact on lawbreakers, and every impact on legitimate hunters. The lawbreakers already have their own means to detour around the law. That's what they do. They break the law.
There are people who argue that certain, semi-automatic firearms are widely used to commit crimes, and that the best way to moderate those crimes is to ban those semi-automatic firearms. Apparently, by making it easier to commit a crime, possession of these firearms makes us more likely to become criminals. Our society must, therefore, be safer if those firearms are out of our hands.
Suppressors are also legal in New Zealand. I find it amusing that other countries with whacko gun laws have no issue with suppressors while my country with relatively liberal gun laws is whacko about supressors.
I doubt if they will ever be allowed in the "good ole boy" liberal state of North Carolina.
Of course misinformation and honest ignorance about supressors are to blame for the bad rap they receive.
Wow this turned into a great discussion. I have a question for anyone that might have experience. Do you have to do a lot of extra cleaning on a suppressor after several shots? I would think with all those baffles catching the gases you would have one heck of a mess before long.
Here in norway we have very strict laws concerning guns.. not even our police is carrying unless specially ordered by a djudge, and then full SWAT tactics are enforced.. But i was only 13 when i bought a 22 long rifle with legal silencer/suppressor (-same thing but dependant on weather the bullet traveling through them are subsonic or not since the supersonic bullets will break the sound barrier and make a bang well after leaving the barrel and suppression device) And we cant even own semiautomatic rifles that look military in origin cos of the bad reputation it could give legal hunters here among the rest of the civillian population.. resulting in that we can own a ruger mini-14 for instance but not an AR-15.. or anything that look too military.. cant use a semi with pistol grip or folding stock for hunting etc.. But we can own silencers for all legal hunting rifles if we can show any real need or use for it ;) just claiming u wanna protect your hearing is sufficient.. and what most people dont reccon in to the formula is that silencers will dampen some of the recoil of a rifle, though not as effectively as a muzzle break, then with the added bonus of not increasing noise and blast from the gun :)
Silencers are a good thing.. and i dont see why hunters would ever need to use military weapons of any kind.. (i mean modern warfare type not older mausers and garands etc.. :P )
Me im looking forward to getting a stainless mini-14 with a suppressor on it for plinking and smallgame hunting as soon as my finances clear up.. why?? cos i can ;) moahahahahaaaaa!!!!
yuh, best.. suuureee. thats why u have 32 million illiterate people in the us and 2 million people occupy the jails at all times and u cant legally own silencers/supressors :P
:D:D:D
Not to mention that US is turning into a third world country again :P
Put me down in the "Meh" category. I'm certainly not opposed to the use of suppressors because it makes a lot of sense. But as long as the federal restrictions are in place, legalizing them for hunting is mostly a symbolic thing that'll imact a small handful of hunters. It won't change a thing for the majority of us, but it certainly won't hurt anything either.
So what your saying is that a group of friends (as long as one of them lives in Kansas and has a clean FBI record) can pool their money together and purchase a silencer, then utilize other Kansas laws to legally carry that rifle loaded and uncased in a vehicle and legally shoot from inside of it at a trophy deer, antelope, or elk (and tell the game warden you were shooting at a varmint).
Will the FBI background check cover wildlife violations.
The added ability of being quieter will sure make it easier for a poacher to cut the rack off a carcass in the field, and not worry about being caught.
Good job Kansas!!! Next year can you legalize hunting with IR night vision scope or a laser sight, because there a few people who want to use them when hunting raccoons???
Prairie dogs exist in a small portion of the state, but the new law will apply to all species statewide.
I know the majority who read this blog apply ethics and fair chase when hunting, but this law encourages neither of the two.
I guess it is still in the hands of the Kansas hunter now, who can contact their Governor and tell him to veto it unless they want it.
At my new job there is another teacher who is hunter from Scotland and about a week ago we got to talking about hunting. In his homeland suppressors are used to cut down on noise pollution and to not bother the neighbors. However hunting with a bow is illegal, because it’s considered to be animal cruelty to kill with anything other than a bullet.
Game Protector,
Wasn't me who -1'd you. Hit you with a +, as we are all just voicing opinions here, not arguing or getting personal.
regards,
S Ga
once again people wanting to restrict me because of the chance of a crime. What are you people thinking? According to your way of thinking, I should not be able to to buy a magazine with 30 rounds in it. I can have 90 ten round magazines, but not one 30 round magazine, because of the potential of maybe using it in a crime. How stupid does that sound? Has anyone on here, that is rejecting this idea, actually used a "wicked, evil spewing silencer?" I didn't think so, because it is obvious you don't know what you are talking about. They Do NOT make them SILENT! You watch too much TV, get outdoors and live a little. Go to the local gun range, use one...somebody you know has one...and then make your comment as an informed, inteligent communicator. Until then do as my Grandpaw always said, keep your mouth shut and let them THINK you are an idiot, don't open it and prove it!
WE ARE THE BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD, IN ALL OF MANKINDS HISTORY. QUIT TRYING TO MESS IT UP!
to: ingebrigsten, yeah you're right, that's why all of us illiterate Americans have to be deployed to countries like yours to get rid of the terrorists you don't have the balls to take down. Most of our soldiers are currently deployed in other countries, yet still no one messes with us. We ARE NATO's watchdogs, and there's a reason for it.
what is next odorless shells. new completely smoke free. guns cause noise. get over it. another attempt to fix something that is not broken.
Post a Comment