Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Deeter: 3M Acquires Ross Reels

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

FlyTalk
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

September 30, 2010

Deeter: 3M Acquires Ross Reels

By Kirk Deeter

We just got wind that 3M, already one of the largest players in the fly fishing market through its Scientific Anglers brand, has acquired Ross Reels. We had heard rumblings that something of this order was up with Ross for several months, but did not know the suitor until today.


Seems like a solid match. As most of you know, 3M is an innovation-focused company. So too is Ross. In fact, its newest F1 reel model is so-named because it employs technologies actually used in Formula 1 racing cars. (We will review this reel on fieldandstream.com when we actually test one; availability is December 1.) While 3M has its own reels, I suspect this only opens manufacturing options for both brands to cover a wide range of pricepoints. I also suspect the move will give Ross more marketing muscle.

Here is the press release:

ST. PAUL, Minn. – September 30, 2010 – 3M announced today that it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Ross Reels, a Colorado-based manufacturer of fly fishing equipment and accessories. Terms of the transaction were not disclosed.

Ross Reels is recognized as one of the top fly reel manufacturers in the United States. Its full line of products includes high quality fly rods, complete fly fishing outfits, reel outfits, rod cases, fishing pliers and other outdoor related products. 3M, through its Scientific Anglers brand, offers a wide variety of products and equipment for all fly fishing experiences, including fly lines, reels, rods, boxes and instructional DVDs.

“The addition of Ross Reels builds on 3M’s core fly fishing portfolio and further expands the business,” said Gabi Sabongi, vice president, New Business Ventures, 3M Consumer and Office Business. “The combination of the well-recognized Ross Reels brand products with3M's Scientific Anglers branded fly fishing lines, reels, rods and accessories will allow 3M to better serve consumers and retailers in North America.”

3M’s angling scientists and design team work in partnership with fly-fishing legends to develop cutting-edge technologies and ultimate fly line designs to modernize the sport. Throughout its 60 year history in this market, 3M has been inventing premier fly fishing products—from the contemporary floating fly line more than 50 years ago to the specialty core construction and patented Sharkskin technologies.

Ross Reels employs approximately 25 people at its operations in Montrose, Colorado. The transaction is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter.

Deeter

Comments (23)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Woodstock wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Regarding innovations, (and please correct me if I'm wrong) I believe 3M / Sci Anglers may have introduced one of the single most important innovations in fly angling: the "weight" system of defining fly rods as we know it today; i.e. the 6-weight, 8-weight, etc.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Woodstock, it's that innovation that keeps you from understanding how rods really work. Manufacturers mislabel to such an extent they put a 4wt label on a 6wt rod. And these factory sticks are allowed in distance casting competitions, but when a custom builder does the same thing, it's considered cheating in the same competition.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Koldbut...never heard that one before. If I buy a 5wt. rod, and match it up with a 5wt line, normally right in the ballgame. Graphite rods have the capability of accepting one wt down and one wt. up according to the action of the rod, but I regard the system as a great system. The entire thing is somewhat suggestive as it depends on your own, personal stroke as well as to what line matches up, but hard to beat the system.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Faysu, If you look up the "Common Cents System"(google it), you will realize that the rod companies have you trained, a fast 4wt rod is really a 6wt by use of the common cents method.

Back on topic, I look forward to seeing what reel innovations come from this.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

koldkut,
Really? So when I buy a rod companies 4wt why does a 4 wt line load it up properly, for me anyway? Tell me one rod co. that does that, and I will go try it out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

koldkut, Ok, I googled it up, and read the article by Bill Byrd...he's your guru on rod actions and lines that match right? I'd say the guy is a little kooky. Just my opinion. I know for a fact of several misinformations he provides. He can enjoy is ultra lts. and catching whopper fish on light lines, that's his choice. It has been my observation that the movement is away from these smaller wt. rods, and that comes from some notables who are promoting that as well.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Sayfu, the site is http://www.common-cents.info/

Here's some hard CCS data to chew on as well
http://www.superbob.org/CC_Data.htm

The numbers to look at are the manufactures rating, this means that the ERN should be in the middle range of that whole number, so a 5wt, should ERN to close to 5.5. A 5 ERN should be a 4/5 wt and a 6 ERN would be a 5/6. If the Manufacturer lists a 5 wt that ERN's to 7, I'm sure they are marketing them as "fast" 5wts. If you check out some of the ads in AnglingTrade's September edition, Pac Bay is now listing the ERN's(Effective Rod Numbers) and Action Angles(AA) for their blanks. Look at any rod that Steve Rajef uses in casting comps. Not to take away from his casting abilities, he's the man there, but he also takes a "fast" rod to the platform. I would love to see a competition where you can bring any rod, so as long as it measures in it's proper ERN rating for that line class. There is also some info on line wt's on the common cents website and their true measure on the common cents site.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

io was going to get into one of those big competitions in Salt Lake City, and never did...practiced a lot, and then never entered. I think they put out 4 or 5 rods of different mfgers that you can choose from, and a caster can choose whatever rod in the group. And that has changed some every year. They cast 9' 5wts in the latest competitions I believe. I still think the line/wt system is a good one for the consumer. Describe the wind/ weather conditions you fish in, the size of the water, size of flies you will be casting, distance, fish size, and you can come to a comfortable wt. rod to use. Works good for me, and for a lot of anglers.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

watching you guys talk back and forth really opened my eyes on some things. thanks for the info. i always thought that if you have a 5 weight rod you could go with line from 4-6 weight. i try to match the exact weight but if the shop is out of that size i have gone to 4 or 6. what do you guys say on that? thanks.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

James, any rod will cast any wt line, just what length of a given wt line it will load properly is what you need to look at. On that common-cents site, it does go into the line weight dynamics. Lining one up or one down to achieve the rod performance at X distance(up a wt for shorter distances and down a weight for longer distances) will work for the common angler. I know how frustrating it can be trying to fish at 10 yards with a rod/line combo that doesn't load nicely until you hit 20 yards. I wouldn't have thought twice about this until I started building rods, and once I did, I was able to look back at the years when I ran a 7wt DT line on a 5wt rod in order to punch line directly into the wind. I knew it worked back then, now I know why and I can also make better selections based upon that knowledge. It's about presentation and what works for you. You may have a fast 5 wt, line it up with a 6 because that is all the stores has and find that you really like it. I would like to see more rod manufacturers put the ERN and AA on all their rods, but then you wouldn't be fooled into thinking that this rod can outcast that rod because they say it's a fast rod(and maybe paying more for it). Rather, making an educated choice by choosing a rod by a standard weight classification and matching a line for what you want it to do by seeing it's 30' weight.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

thanks for that, koldkut. good info.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

jamesti, I consider it a product of the evolution of graphite. Fast action rods depend on you getting a full length of line out before they will flex properly (load up) OR...you have a very aggressive stroke in order to bend the rod bringing in to play speed plus the wt. of the line. As I got older, I no longer wanted to make casting an effort by having to aggressively move a fast action rod through the air. Short casts don't work very well with a fast action rod.
If I am steelheading, and always picking up a lot of line, and no problem loading a rod then I will use a fast action rod, but that's it. For trout fishing I prefer the medium to medium fast action rods. They cushion lighter tippets, and a relaxed stroke can load them up. The rod does the work, not me. When a rod says a 5/6 many determine that to mean a 5 DT line, and a 6wt WF line. Once you extend past 30 ft in the air, the DT line has a bigger line section that weighs more than the small running line of a WF line. If you have an exceptionally "flexy rod" considered a slower action rod, you can speed it up by using a one wt. lighter line on it, and if your rod is a stiffo-biffo fast action rod, you can overload it to slow it down, and load it up easier..A lot of times though you want to lay that fly on the water softly if using a dry fly, and don't want the more surface disturbance of a heavier line. Choosing the right line for the rod depending on your stroke makes it a subjective thing. Line wts. vary by 10-15 grain wts. or so, making a line at the bottom of the grain wt. very close to the line wt. below, and visa versa. There have even been lines mfgered lately that are say 5 1/2 wt. lines. That means the 5 wt. line is at the top of the grain wt. scale suggesting that your faster action rod will probably cast it better.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big Country wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

I have learned alot from this thread. Thak you both for the info here.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

most of what you guys are saying are things i never took into account when buying fly line. i'm gonna have to print this up and do more homework. might improve my casting. thanks for the info guys.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

And I just read koldkuts post, and it is right on. And another thought on loading rods, and line wts. You do not always have to fully load a rod to make a cast. If I have a short distance of line out past the tip, wanting to make a short cast, I am just flexing the tip using a shorter stroke to make the cast. As more line extends out, and more wt. I more fully flex the rod using a longer stroke, until I overload the rod with more wt. out than the rod is designed to handle, and the cast bogs down, slows down. Faster action rods will carry more line wt. in the air.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Interesting things on this subject are coming to me. I was at a Sportsman's Show years ago, and Jason Borger's dad, Gary, was putting on a casting lesson/presentation at the casting pond. Near the end of his casting presentation he said, "How could you make a cast to a fish if you walked down to the water, and it was rising right here near my feet? That would make for a very hard cast to make." Gary took the fly in his hand holding it so the hook wouldn't embed in his hand, held the line secure at the reel, and used the rod like a bow'n arrow, and shot the fly out to the target. Now that's loading up the rod with very little line out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Looks like the FlyTalk community could use a little more on the subject.....eh KD/TR?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from countitandone wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Deet ~ Back on topic, I have given away many Ross Essence Fly Combos to relatives or friends I thought might take the next step in fly fishing. Affordable packaged deals...rod, reel, backing, fly line and tapered leader coupled with a great instructional DVD by Mel Krieger came to me by way of Sierra Trading Post for a song.

All in all, a wise move and good partnering. I still use my 3wt Essence on a Ross Flywater 1 for those brookies and greenbacks. Year after year. Thanks Deet for the heads up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Anyone see the latest FlyFisherman Magazine? The have featured Steve Rajeff describing 6 tips to longer distance casting. Made my hat not fit. He emphasized the same thing I did on these threads...that learning to distance cast is learning to form tight loops, and making casting "efficient" for all distances and conditions. Another article on musky fishing describes the author as stating, "if it takes you 5 false casts to cast 40 ft., and I like to cast 80 ft casts with 3 false casts, then my fly is in the water fishing twice as long in a days time than your fly is. I can generally do that with ONE false cast, but maybe not trying to throw the big, musky fly that guy would be throwing. Rajeff describes the need to be efficient, cast long, and accurate when salt water fishing, and that benefits all your flyfishing....salt and freshwater. Anyone interested should buy a copy. There are definitely some tips I will be practising.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dougfish wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Good thread! My two cents: I prefer a medium action rod. My 9', 6 wt. is lined with 6wt. DT. It feels right, loads well for short to medium casts and most important for me - roll casts like a dream with drys or weighted nymphs. DT makes me a better roll caster on my tight eastern streams. My wife fishes a 8'6", 5 wt. fast action. I relined it with 6 wt. WF and it definitely benefited by loading better on short-medium casts. Before I relined it, she preferred my rod. Whew, got my Clearwater back. For the really small steams, the whippy 7'6", 4wt. has 4 WF line on it because the average cast has less than 10 ft. of fly line out. More flippin', less traditional casting. My point is, you have to consider the conditions and how you fish as well, when matching equipment up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

You've got it. Roll casting is definitely improved with the more flexy rods. Very few graphites accept a few cheapies, are slow action rods. If they are, they have too much glass in them, and it causes the over flexing that makes casting, and accuracy difficult. A number of fly fishing schools, mine included would teach students that they can learn to cast better, feel the rod load up getting the timing down on the backcast, and when to go forward, by overlining their rod by one line wt.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

3M probably stumbled onto an adhesive they can use to attach and detach a reel to a flyrod non-mechanically - the "Post-It" reel seat.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 32 weeks ago

MLH...You sound like a very creative angler..hope you didn't miss your calling. :)

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from jamesti wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

watching you guys talk back and forth really opened my eyes on some things. thanks for the info. i always thought that if you have a 5 weight rod you could go with line from 4-6 weight. i try to match the exact weight but if the shop is out of that size i have gone to 4 or 6. what do you guys say on that? thanks.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

jamesti, I consider it a product of the evolution of graphite. Fast action rods depend on you getting a full length of line out before they will flex properly (load up) OR...you have a very aggressive stroke in order to bend the rod bringing in to play speed plus the wt. of the line. As I got older, I no longer wanted to make casting an effort by having to aggressively move a fast action rod through the air. Short casts don't work very well with a fast action rod.
If I am steelheading, and always picking up a lot of line, and no problem loading a rod then I will use a fast action rod, but that's it. For trout fishing I prefer the medium to medium fast action rods. They cushion lighter tippets, and a relaxed stroke can load them up. The rod does the work, not me. When a rod says a 5/6 many determine that to mean a 5 DT line, and a 6wt WF line. Once you extend past 30 ft in the air, the DT line has a bigger line section that weighs more than the small running line of a WF line. If you have an exceptionally "flexy rod" considered a slower action rod, you can speed it up by using a one wt. lighter line on it, and if your rod is a stiffo-biffo fast action rod, you can overload it to slow it down, and load it up easier..A lot of times though you want to lay that fly on the water softly if using a dry fly, and don't want the more surface disturbance of a heavier line. Choosing the right line for the rod depending on your stroke makes it a subjective thing. Line wts. vary by 10-15 grain wts. or so, making a line at the bottom of the grain wt. very close to the line wt. below, and visa versa. There have even been lines mfgered lately that are say 5 1/2 wt. lines. That means the 5 wt. line is at the top of the grain wt. scale suggesting that your faster action rod will probably cast it better.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Faysu, If you look up the "Common Cents System"(google it), you will realize that the rod companies have you trained, a fast 4wt rod is really a 6wt by use of the common cents method.

Back on topic, I look forward to seeing what reel innovations come from this.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Sayfu, the site is http://www.common-cents.info/

Here's some hard CCS data to chew on as well
http://www.superbob.org/CC_Data.htm

The numbers to look at are the manufactures rating, this means that the ERN should be in the middle range of that whole number, so a 5wt, should ERN to close to 5.5. A 5 ERN should be a 4/5 wt and a 6 ERN would be a 5/6. If the Manufacturer lists a 5 wt that ERN's to 7, I'm sure they are marketing them as "fast" 5wts. If you check out some of the ads in AnglingTrade's September edition, Pac Bay is now listing the ERN's(Effective Rod Numbers) and Action Angles(AA) for their blanks. Look at any rod that Steve Rajef uses in casting comps. Not to take away from his casting abilities, he's the man there, but he also takes a "fast" rod to the platform. I would love to see a competition where you can bring any rod, so as long as it measures in it's proper ERN rating for that line class. There is also some info on line wt's on the common cents website and their true measure on the common cents site.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

io was going to get into one of those big competitions in Salt Lake City, and never did...practiced a lot, and then never entered. I think they put out 4 or 5 rods of different mfgers that you can choose from, and a caster can choose whatever rod in the group. And that has changed some every year. They cast 9' 5wts in the latest competitions I believe. I still think the line/wt system is a good one for the consumer. Describe the wind/ weather conditions you fish in, the size of the water, size of flies you will be casting, distance, fish size, and you can come to a comfortable wt. rod to use. Works good for me, and for a lot of anglers.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

James, any rod will cast any wt line, just what length of a given wt line it will load properly is what you need to look at. On that common-cents site, it does go into the line weight dynamics. Lining one up or one down to achieve the rod performance at X distance(up a wt for shorter distances and down a weight for longer distances) will work for the common angler. I know how frustrating it can be trying to fish at 10 yards with a rod/line combo that doesn't load nicely until you hit 20 yards. I wouldn't have thought twice about this until I started building rods, and once I did, I was able to look back at the years when I ran a 7wt DT line on a 5wt rod in order to punch line directly into the wind. I knew it worked back then, now I know why and I can also make better selections based upon that knowledge. It's about presentation and what works for you. You may have a fast 5 wt, line it up with a 6 because that is all the stores has and find that you really like it. I would like to see more rod manufacturers put the ERN and AA on all their rods, but then you wouldn't be fooled into thinking that this rod can outcast that rod because they say it's a fast rod(and maybe paying more for it). Rather, making an educated choice by choosing a rod by a standard weight classification and matching a line for what you want it to do by seeing it's 30' weight.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

thanks for that, koldkut. good info.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jamesti wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

most of what you guys are saying are things i never took into account when buying fly line. i'm gonna have to print this up and do more homework. might improve my casting. thanks for the info guys.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Woodstock wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Regarding innovations, (and please correct me if I'm wrong) I believe 3M / Sci Anglers may have introduced one of the single most important innovations in fly angling: the "weight" system of defining fly rods as we know it today; i.e. the 6-weight, 8-weight, etc.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Woodstock, it's that innovation that keeps you from understanding how rods really work. Manufacturers mislabel to such an extent they put a 4wt label on a 6wt rod. And these factory sticks are allowed in distance casting competitions, but when a custom builder does the same thing, it's considered cheating in the same competition.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Koldbut...never heard that one before. If I buy a 5wt. rod, and match it up with a 5wt line, normally right in the ballgame. Graphite rods have the capability of accepting one wt down and one wt. up according to the action of the rod, but I regard the system as a great system. The entire thing is somewhat suggestive as it depends on your own, personal stroke as well as to what line matches up, but hard to beat the system.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

koldkut,
Really? So when I buy a rod companies 4wt why does a 4 wt line load it up properly, for me anyway? Tell me one rod co. that does that, and I will go try it out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

koldkut, Ok, I googled it up, and read the article by Bill Byrd...he's your guru on rod actions and lines that match right? I'd say the guy is a little kooky. Just my opinion. I know for a fact of several misinformations he provides. He can enjoy is ultra lts. and catching whopper fish on light lines, that's his choice. It has been my observation that the movement is away from these smaller wt. rods, and that comes from some notables who are promoting that as well.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big Country wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

I have learned alot from this thread. Thak you both for the info here.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

And I just read koldkuts post, and it is right on. And another thought on loading rods, and line wts. You do not always have to fully load a rod to make a cast. If I have a short distance of line out past the tip, wanting to make a short cast, I am just flexing the tip using a shorter stroke to make the cast. As more line extends out, and more wt. I more fully flex the rod using a longer stroke, until I overload the rod with more wt. out than the rod is designed to handle, and the cast bogs down, slows down. Faster action rods will carry more line wt. in the air.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Interesting things on this subject are coming to me. I was at a Sportsman's Show years ago, and Jason Borger's dad, Gary, was putting on a casting lesson/presentation at the casting pond. Near the end of his casting presentation he said, "How could you make a cast to a fish if you walked down to the water, and it was rising right here near my feet? That would make for a very hard cast to make." Gary took the fly in his hand holding it so the hook wouldn't embed in his hand, held the line secure at the reel, and used the rod like a bow'n arrow, and shot the fly out to the target. Now that's loading up the rod with very little line out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Koldkut wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Looks like the FlyTalk community could use a little more on the subject.....eh KD/TR?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from countitandone wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Deet ~ Back on topic, I have given away many Ross Essence Fly Combos to relatives or friends I thought might take the next step in fly fishing. Affordable packaged deals...rod, reel, backing, fly line and tapered leader coupled with a great instructional DVD by Mel Krieger came to me by way of Sierra Trading Post for a song.

All in all, a wise move and good partnering. I still use my 3wt Essence on a Ross Flywater 1 for those brookies and greenbacks. Year after year. Thanks Deet for the heads up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Anyone see the latest FlyFisherman Magazine? The have featured Steve Rajeff describing 6 tips to longer distance casting. Made my hat not fit. He emphasized the same thing I did on these threads...that learning to distance cast is learning to form tight loops, and making casting "efficient" for all distances and conditions. Another article on musky fishing describes the author as stating, "if it takes you 5 false casts to cast 40 ft., and I like to cast 80 ft casts with 3 false casts, then my fly is in the water fishing twice as long in a days time than your fly is. I can generally do that with ONE false cast, but maybe not trying to throw the big, musky fly that guy would be throwing. Rajeff describes the need to be efficient, cast long, and accurate when salt water fishing, and that benefits all your flyfishing....salt and freshwater. Anyone interested should buy a copy. There are definitely some tips I will be practising.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dougfish wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

Good thread! My two cents: I prefer a medium action rod. My 9', 6 wt. is lined with 6wt. DT. It feels right, loads well for short to medium casts and most important for me - roll casts like a dream with drys or weighted nymphs. DT makes me a better roll caster on my tight eastern streams. My wife fishes a 8'6", 5 wt. fast action. I relined it with 6 wt. WF and it definitely benefited by loading better on short-medium casts. Before I relined it, she preferred my rod. Whew, got my Clearwater back. For the really small steams, the whippy 7'6", 4wt. has 4 WF line on it because the average cast has less than 10 ft. of fly line out. More flippin', less traditional casting. My point is, you have to consider the conditions and how you fish as well, when matching equipment up.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

You've got it. Roll casting is definitely improved with the more flexy rods. Very few graphites accept a few cheapies, are slow action rods. If they are, they have too much glass in them, and it causes the over flexing that makes casting, and accuracy difficult. A number of fly fishing schools, mine included would teach students that they can learn to cast better, feel the rod load up getting the timing down on the backcast, and when to go forward, by overlining their rod by one line wt.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

3M probably stumbled onto an adhesive they can use to attach and detach a reel to a flyrod non-mechanically - the "Post-It" reel seat.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 1 year 32 weeks ago

MLH...You sound like a very creative angler..hope you didn't miss your calling. :)

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment