


July 29, 2009
Rifles of Interest: The Anschutz Model 1770
By David E. Petzal
Just when you thought I was a man of the people, writing about $500 econo-guns…

I’ve always admired Anschutz rifles because they are very accurate and very German. In a time when everyone is selling out to American culture, Anschutz remains as teutonic as lederhosen, Wagner festivals, and sauerkraut farts. However, while the 1770 could not be anything but a Deutsche Bucsche*, it is distinctly American in purpose—it is the reincarnation of a gun I remember from my youth, the walking-around varmint rifle.
Once upon a time the proper form for hunting varmints was to sling a hunting-weight .22 centerfire across your back, put lunch and a canteen in a pack, and hike o’er hill and dale (being careful, of course, not to step in the cowflop) to see what was there. Townsend Whelen and Warren Page loved to do this, and I did too. Now, however, any respectable varmint rifle has to weigh as much as one of Rosie O’Donnell’s buttocks, which takes the fun out of the hiking.
Enter der Anschutz 1770, which weighs just under 8 pounds, has a medium-weight barrel of just under 22 inches, and can be carried around by a normal human being. It’s chambered in .223 only, has a big tactical bolt handle, and a very nice single-stage trigger that’s set at 2 ½ pounds. The action is actually Anschutz’ first new one in a long time, and features six (!) locking lugs and a very short 60-degree bolt lift.
The stock on my 1770 was a very, very pretty piece of fiddleback walnut with a Schweinsruken* (hog’s-back) comb, Schnabel fore-end, and very deep, full pistol grip. (I’ve just learned that in response to American demand, there will be a Classic 1770 with a straight comb, and a Luxus with a Monte Carlo comb.)
The one jarring note is a detachable in-line magazine with luminous strips along its sides. I guess they’re there to keep you from losing the thing. I didn’t have the 1770 for as long as I might have liked—there was only the one in the U.S.—and so I didn’t get the kind of accuracy out of it that I’m convinced it was capable of. Most ammo turned in 3/4-inch, 5-shot groups at 100 yards, but Ich schwore* bei Gott that if I could have wrestled with it for a while longer the groups would have measured 1/2-inch.
At $2,495 the 1770 is an expensive rifle, but it is also exotic, a wonderful piece of gunmaking, and a delightful gun to shoot. If you are jaded at all the synthetic-stocked look-alikes that grace our gunrooms, here is something truly different. Jga.anschuetz-sport.com.
*Yes, I know the umlauts are missing. You put umlauts in my MAC and I’ll use them.
Comments (47)
DEP-
Great rifle, entertaining to look at, way over my price limit. My Savage 10 in .223 has most of the advantages stated at about $1500 dollars less, but it sadly does not have the Schnabel fore-end. But, it is more accurate! Also, no detachable mag to lose.
Forgot to mention, the Savage 10 is also in left hand configuration.
From Clays archives of bookmarks, places, information and things to read,
January 28, 2009
Petzal: Random Wisdom from SCI
from Clay Cooper wrote 24 weeks 8 hours ago
“You know what the trouble with some of these gun companies is? They’re run by yuppies who don’t know anything about guns?
Gee Mr. Wizard, it sounds like Coops echo from the past! Instead of calling them they’re run by yuppies, I called them Goober Smoochers from I don’t no didly squat University and may I add, the only “Wild Turkey they hunt is in the bottom of a bottle!”
No one knows how to use a file.”—a Beretta gunsmith? NO JOKE!
Before I told the Trucking Industries to take this job and shove it, I could not believe how those maintenance monkeys didn’t know how to even use a wrench yet alone a cutting torch. I wish I had a nickel every time someone would say, what do you know you’re just a truck driver and my response where were you on the first Space Shuttle Launch Pilgrim, not only I was there to setup the operations center at White Sands I was also there to assist in the recovery of the Space Shuttle!
Why do you don’t see any new Colt revolvers? Just like all the rest, you can give thanks the Unions for that doing what they do best, putting their own selfish interests before the company. Right when Colt needed the cash to fight the Goons from Clintons Sarah Braden and city suing the firearms manufacturers, the Machinist Union just had to show there butt and walk out causing Colt to fold under the pressure and guess what, they lost their job because of it!
The bottom line is this; years ago the Owner of a European Gun Manufacturer was right when he was asked what he thought about American Made Guns. His answer, “UNFINISHED!”
What do you here now when you call customer service? Some fella named Johnny from overseas and when it comes to shooting? O’BROTHER, “DON’T GET ME STARTED ON THIS ONE!”
From computers to shooting, The United States has lost the edge on every skill imaginable!
Food for thought, the national average of job performance of an individual being hired is 60%. The reason why skilled workers are laid off because the Company has turned their position into nothing more than warm bodies apply only!! Did you know that Companies pays 3 time more in salary for that one position replacing a person for a position rather than keeping them and giving them a pay raise costing much less.
What did you say bottles up?
NO STUPID,
IT’S TARGETS UP!!!!
In my older age, accurate rifles and smooth function fascinate me the most and The Anschutz Model 1770 has my attention! What aggravates me the most, I have to send my Springfield XD45 made in Croatia back to the Springfield Factory for a trigger job. What happened to accuracy and made in the USA has become lost!
To make an umlaut on a Mac, press option and then the letter on the keyboard. You can also use the "International Pane" in system prefs to turn on the keyboard viewer and see the entire character pallet. Good article by the way. I try to read your articles everyday.
i will keep my ATR in 30.06. the 1770 seems like a great gun but the price tag is little to high for my tastes.
I truly believe that walking around shooting groundhogs with a .222 Remington was what made me a better than average game shot. Walking up groundhogs led to all types of shots at different ranges. Some close on 'hogs running for their holes and some as far away as I could stretch a .222 and a 6X Weaver. All taken from different rests and positions that made each trip a training session. Nowdays here in Southern Indiana a person could walk many a mile and never see a groundhog but when I was growing up in the 60's it was a different story indeed.
I gotta say boys; this rile is just to "sterile" for me.
It just doesn't have an American look to it? I guess I'm saying it's not for me, and I hope it does indeed shoot better then it looks!
I must say I do like the stock; REAL WOOD accept no imitations!
Anschutz makes good stuff. Perhaps that is an understatement.
Interesting that the gun in the picture with the open sights and huge scope with low rings and tall "receiver" looks like a Merkel KR1. Perhaps it is the Merkel tag, but it just doesn't look like an Anschutz. Are you breaking in a new intern?
fyi--RILE=RIFLE
This Anschutz 1770 might be a masterpiece of workmanship but it certainly is one UGLY sucker. No wonder only one is available as they probably can't sell two plus it won't be manufactured in a couple years anyway. Thanks but I would rather have a Cooper, a Montana, a Kimber, a local custom, or maybe even a Darcy if he would make a little rifle, well maybe I wouldn't go so far as to order one of Darcy's expensive pieces of craftsmanship but you get my drift. Certainly a Savage or Shaw is more worthwhile in my opinion. I have a walk around varmint rifle and sometimes wonder why I bought it but then remember its tiny groups. A heavy barrel varmint suits my shooting better as one thing I agree with the cowboys on is "why walk if you can ride".
2500 bucks for a rifle you have "wrestle with" to get half MOA in this day and age isn't the best way come to the market. The fact that it's anschutz will help it out some, and it is a sharp looking rifle. Not real sure why something as "teutonic as saurkraut farts etc" would be made available with classic american styling...
I've never used the international pane or the keyboard viewer that chrishuge suggested to make an umlaut on the Mac, but an easy way to do that without memorizing keystroke combinations is to use the special characters palette. The easiest way to access it is to click the American flag icon at the upper right of your screen. A drop-down menu will appear and one of the selections is "Show Character Palette." Select it and your typesetting world will change for the better.
Here is a video that demonstrates an alternate way of accessing the Characters Palette, but this method isn't available if you're using MS Word on a Mac, or at least not on my version version of Word.
http://www.apple.com/business/theater/#specialcharacters
Great article, Dave. Keep up the good work!
I think it's pretty... I like the Schnabel forend and the Swineshreiken comb, of course I have always been a huge fan of German engineering.
I think I might own your old rifle, rlriggins. It's a Remington 722 in .222 Remington with a 6X Weaver. A classic in every sense of the term.
Dave was kind enough not to show the cheekpiece side of this rifle. If it's anything like the "Bavarian style" CZ's, it would make you weep to see such a waste of fine walnut.
I like the styling of the rifle and think it is beatiful in its own way. It's either something you like or hate. I for one would love to have one.The price probably isn't going to go down anytime soon either.
It does look like a Merkel KR1. Are they affiliates?
I really don't know why so many are appalled by detachable magazines. What really puzzles me is that most of the time, the same gunwriters who abhor detachable magazines on rifles are also HUGE fans of the All-American 1911 pistol. Ross Seyfried, a known hater of detachable magazines (and a favorite writer of mine), even wrote that "'clips' belong on pistols."
And while I'm on the topic, I'm even more puzzled by Col. Jeff Cooper's distaste for autoloading rifles [calls them jammatics] when he too is a great advocate of the 1911 pistol. Is there something in the 1911 that other autoloaders don't possess? Oh, to make matters more complicated, Col. Cooper also tried to sell us in the last several years of his life a ridiculously expensive, ugly bolt-action Steyr "scout" rifle with detachable magazines and a fold-away bipod. And nobody took him to task for such obvious shilling (I just offended millions of Jeff Cooper fans).
The people who literally stake their very lives on their weapons, the soldiers and marines (they call them warfighters now) and police officers, use detachable magazines. Why is it OK to use detachable magazines on a fighting tool, and not on a hunting one?
To me, it is not a "pretty" rifle. I would have to get my hands on one and shoot it some to pass judgement though. Still, regarding the price, I will just keep my Remingtons, Marlins, etc.
Sure would like the scope though.
I think it's nice looking. Too expensive, but nice looking. With so many bolts having that same look about them, this is different enough to draw the eyes.
Like my H&K SL-7, I like a slightly different look once in a while.
looks and sounds like a very nice, but expensive rifle. i also agree that with some tuning, the groups could have been shrunk a bit, unless this one was a pooch. i wonder why they opted to use the 223 exclusively. it would seem to me that many varmint hunters would like to have a choice of at least 3 calibers.
O Garcia I agree ,. well said.
As to the rifle in question its German,( from Germany )
which in and of itself that says a lot.
Mostly good but in may experiance usually over done.
Its almost grossly expensive given its intended use ,.more over it looks clubby to me.
Unless the bolt housing is really light.
Have shot a number of rifles with Schweinsruken ( sp?) combs ,. which I have come to refer to as
"broke-back mountain stocks"
Which transates to I don't like em
But I like the Schnabel forend
Qualifier: I have not held this partular rifle model.
Then again,.
I can watch people fish on TV
Different strokes I guess
If it's anything like the 1712, then it fits like an old trusty work glove that never lets you down. Then it will shoot easily a 1/2 moa with good loads. It does look like it does not have the monte carlo comb, which is the icing on the cake for me. Annies are top notch, so much so that if any of you go look at the hunter class at a smallbore silhouette match, more than half the line will have an annie 1712. I would for sure own one of these if I had a wad of cash to blow.
Eine wunderbare Waffe ohne Hinweis der westlichen Einfluss. If I had the dollars, I'd have the rifle. Very nice.
I could never understand what the big deal was over Cooper's scout rifle idea. I see very little in terms of usefulness with such a rifle design. The guy made out to be the best thing since sliced bread but it falls far short in my opinion.
Hey, duckcreekdick and rlriggins...I also own a comparable rifle to this one, but American style---the .222 Remington 722. Still, I love the German/Austrian rifles to a fault, IF I can find one, and IF I can afford it.
I think that Dave has given us more than the rifle to think about in this post...hunting, with a rifle light enough to carry. For years, my favorite for this kind of thing was the little Sako .222, but it kept blowing gases back into my face, so I put it away [traded it]. Dieter Anshutz always has a creative style, and is pushing us to realize there IS a place for the 'walkabout' varmint rifle. Plus, the kids will fight over it when we are gone to Grundsow Himmel.
Thanks, Dave.
Blue
My walking 'round the farm gun is a Weatherby Mark XXII - an Annie in disguise. Has the tube mag. Bought it used for short money.
DP - This Country had a War-Time President who also had cowflop experience. His statement for the ages was:
" Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day "
H.S.Truman
( Yuk,Yuk )
Dave forget about the sauer-krauts and the umlauts! Montana Rifle Co. will sell you one of thier American made short actions in a suitable walking around gun caliber with AA walnut in the Woodland model. It comes with hand cut checkering I might add for $2096.00. They'll also make a lefty model fer ya! No hog back listed though...
I'd rather keep the cash onshore...
http://www.montanarifleco.com/custom.rifles.html#ClassicSeries
Y'all are talking about a lot more rifle than I want for a "walking around rifle". My idea of the perfect WAR is a fondly remembered and often missed Remington Mohawk
in .222 Rem. Light, short, no recoil, dogleg bolt, handy to carry or out of a pickup, and rigged out with a 1 1/2 X 4 all steel Weaver over a see through mount.
One of the cheapest rifles I ever owned, but it accounted for deer, hogs, coyotes, turkeys, small game, varmints and many, many prairie dogs and armidillos. The secret of that little rifle's success was it was a true WAR, always there, always dependable, and always THERE!
I hear ya, crm3006...I handled them, disliked them, and now I wish I had bought a couple of them for my kids. I suppose that some of us figured that nothing would take the place of the .222 in a carryable [is that a word?] rifle. Make that 'portable'. However, Col. Whelen had a thing about all that, didn't he? I am glad to know that Petzel had this experience in his background, too.
It sounds like you did an awful lot of hunting with that rifle. Good memories.
Blue
Blue-
Wasn't so much the hunting that I did with that little rifle, I just had it with me almost everywhere. In a previous occupation in a better, more gun friendly world, I was able to carry that handy little .222 almost 24/7. When what you shoot is a big part of what your family has to eat, "shots of opportunity" can put a lot of meat on the table. My job called for a lot of time spent in pastures and around stock tanks, hence the shots of opportunity. Almost any farmer or rancher was glad to swap hunting privileges for coyote, armadillo and varmint control. A lot of them knew me, and didn't even bother to ask if I had my gun, it was a given. Some gave advice about where a particular coyote or bobcat could be seen. Like I said, better times in a better world!
O Garcia typically a soldier has access to numerous clips which the average hunter probably only one or maybe two. If they are lost or misplaced the hunter be stranded with having a single shot arm that is somewhat difficult to load. Besides why do you require more than 3 to 5 shots from a hunting rifle? I personally have no need for clip fed hunting rifles, defensive guns yes.
Insofar as the scout rifle thing Cooper was way behind the times in suggesting this idea. About 1969 a local Western Auto near where I lived had a Redfield mount and a long eye relief 2.5 x scope that fit in front of the ejection port of a M-94 Winchester. The owner had bought it put it on his personal rifle and then decided it was next to useless. In my niave youth I convinced myself that it was the very thing I required for my M-94. I bought it and installed the whole deal on my rifle but did not consider calling it a scout rifle as it was my deer rifle. It was handy to carry since the scope was not in the way of my hand holding the rifle by the receiver but it was ill balanced. It also was not better than the iron sights that came on the old Winchester or a good peep when the buck approached. I removed the whole affair and returned it to the dealer just as he had said I could when I bought it due to the same reasons that he didn't like it. The mount and scope may still be there in that old store if it is still standing.
crm3006....
it sounds like you might have spent a good deal of time in Tejas. Nice state...spent some quality time there, myself, and the .222 on prairie dogs or pests was just the berries. Was your little Remington accurate? I know, 'accurate enough'...but I just have to wonder how the little portable musket did.
I am in Virginia, now, and never see the 'specialist' rifle like the Anshutz, with a relatively skinny barrel, for sale. I wonder if Dieter Anshutz is going to galvanize one of the American or Brazilian gun factories into bringing out the 'walkabout' .222 or .223? I take it you traded your little rifle, in a weak moment?
Blue
Blue-
Southern Oklahoma, but the attitudes, climate, wildlife and people are virtually the same. What does a little matter of a Red
River mean, anyway?
I have heard that some of the Mohawks were not particularly accurate, but with factory loads, from the prone, and using sacks of feed for a rest, this one would cloverleaf at a measured 100 yds. Lots of prairie dog pups, (about beer can size) fell to that gun
at about 200 yd., more or less, and one never to be forgotten shot on a coyote at 297 steps. Longest shot I ever took with it.
Knocked squirrels out of trees (open sights)and even shot bullfrogs if I didn't have a .22 handy. I never shot on a range in those days except for military, but judging by performance, that little 600 was the exception to the rule. It seemed to have a little thicker or heavier barrel than some I have seen. Regrettably, I lost it in the divorce wars, just wasn't able to hang on to it. I know where it is now, and the present owner has turned down several offers to part with it.
I hear you, Compadre...also spent a while in Oklahoma. Bad woman, good gun, equals a real loss there somewhere. Somewhere, after this Anschutz 1770 is circulated, a guy will be saying, "you take the Chevy, Babe...I'll take the Anschutz." Of course, she will take both.
Hey, Petzel...how about some more on the portable .222/223? You and Dieter Anschutz may have kicked off something here.
Blue
To DEP,
It would seem that the image used for your blog is not of the 1770, (Merkel ?),
check:http://jga.anschuetz-sport.com/index.php5?produktID=307&direkt=Neuheiten&sprache=1&produktShow=detail.
To Jeff 4066: Congrats on the choice of image you use with your name!!
CZ modelwhat is it, 527? nice wood nice blue, shoots lights out, weighs 5-6 pounds... 600 bucks or so? I'm not an anti High dollar guy at all either. I just think the CZ is a sharper looking euro rifle that does all that this one does. Of course its not an anschutz...
Hey, Meplat...that image of Jeff 4066...in Pennsylvania Dutch it would be a Distelfink...what is it, if not that?
Blue
to ishawooa,
thanks for replying.
I somewhat anticipated your answer, and you are right that soldiers and cops often have spare magazines, just in case they run out or accidentally drop the one already loaded in the gun. I'm not really arguing about increased capacity there, after all, detachables on hunting rifles have about the same capacity (even less in some cases) as fixed mags. I'm just curious about why they're avoided, even downright loathed. I understand the biggest issue is with losing them, which never happens with a fixed.
Looks like a beautiful gun but way too pricy for me. I'll stick to my 10/22.
Which reminds me, what happened to that sub-$1,000 Anschutz? Model number escapes me. Oh, sorry, that was a rimfire.
That's a sweet rifle that I did not know was made. And that's the reason I like this blog. I see few rifles that make me lust after them, and this is one of them.
But, the pic is of a merkel.
To Blueridge,
It's the II-WW German Army sniper patch (eagle head & oak leaves). The current patch is exactly the same with a small German flag added to the lower side of the oval.
To All: The first photo to run here was of the wrong gun. The one that is up as of 8/3 is correct. My Mac was hit by lightning and so I've been offline for a week and had no idea until it was way too late.
That makes me feel better. I thought you had horrible taste. The new rifle is truly handsome. Now, am I the only user who doesn't know what an umlaut is?
Yeah, we knew you know the difference - was odd for you not to respond so figured something was up. Too bad the pic is probably in digital rather than hardcopy form - you could right on the back, like McClane did for his classic photo, "bonefish you idiot."
So, when are you getting a KR1 to review. Just for the heck of it should show a pic of the 1770 alongside.
capture your moment in history with the enduring leagacy of art. www.lavinstudio.com
just for the record i have a lot of high end and expensive rifles in my collection but yet to find any to out shoot my annies (anschutz ) rifles or work as smooth...i have had and replaced my coopers as they had issues and flaws in the action.....did i end up with lemons or are they just over priced asembly line works of junk, my cheep savages worked smoother ....tikka is still my favorite for low priced guns ( another not made in the usa ) for those of you who want a gun that will amaze you on the quality buy an annie (anschutz) its worth it after all you get what you pay for ....you want quality ...... its not cheep!!!!! out of the 40 rifles i own 9 are anschutz .....scopes.....lol don't get me started night force hands down...... i have some 6500 series bushnels and mark 2 tactical, mark 4 tactical scopes for sale...
cz is a good cheep priced gun but has the assembly line flaws as well ( metal filings from the bolt cycling) .removable clips are the way to go as you can unload your rifle with ease ....as for those of you who loose the clips do you still have your mittens attached to you coat with a string as well????
jg anschutz gives you an olympic quality gun in all models ....any other usa manufacture want to step up to the plate..
Post a Comment
It does look like a Merkel KR1. Are they affiliates?
I really don't know why so many are appalled by detachable magazines. What really puzzles me is that most of the time, the same gunwriters who abhor detachable magazines on rifles are also HUGE fans of the All-American 1911 pistol. Ross Seyfried, a known hater of detachable magazines (and a favorite writer of mine), even wrote that "'clips' belong on pistols."
And while I'm on the topic, I'm even more puzzled by Col. Jeff Cooper's distaste for autoloading rifles [calls them jammatics] when he too is a great advocate of the 1911 pistol. Is there something in the 1911 that other autoloaders don't possess? Oh, to make matters more complicated, Col. Cooper also tried to sell us in the last several years of his life a ridiculously expensive, ugly bolt-action Steyr "scout" rifle with detachable magazines and a fold-away bipod. And nobody took him to task for such obvious shilling (I just offended millions of Jeff Cooper fans).
The people who literally stake their very lives on their weapons, the soldiers and marines (they call them warfighters now) and police officers, use detachable magazines. Why is it OK to use detachable magazines on a fighting tool, and not on a hunting one?
Dave forget about the sauer-krauts and the umlauts! Montana Rifle Co. will sell you one of thier American made short actions in a suitable walking around gun caliber with AA walnut in the Woodland model. It comes with hand cut checkering I might add for $2096.00. They'll also make a lefty model fer ya! No hog back listed though...
I'd rather keep the cash onshore...
http://www.montanarifleco.com/custom.rifles.html#ClassicSeries
I think it's pretty... I like the Schnabel forend and the Swineshreiken comb, of course I have always been a huge fan of German engineering.
From Clays archives of bookmarks, places, information and things to read,
January 28, 2009
Petzal: Random Wisdom from SCI
from Clay Cooper wrote 24 weeks 8 hours ago
“You know what the trouble with some of these gun companies is? They’re run by yuppies who don’t know anything about guns?
Gee Mr. Wizard, it sounds like Coops echo from the past! Instead of calling them they’re run by yuppies, I called them Goober Smoochers from I don’t no didly squat University and may I add, the only “Wild Turkey they hunt is in the bottom of a bottle!”
No one knows how to use a file.”—a Beretta gunsmith? NO JOKE!
Before I told the Trucking Industries to take this job and shove it, I could not believe how those maintenance monkeys didn’t know how to even use a wrench yet alone a cutting torch. I wish I had a nickel every time someone would say, what do you know you’re just a truck driver and my response where were you on the first Space Shuttle Launch Pilgrim, not only I was there to setup the operations center at White Sands I was also there to assist in the recovery of the Space Shuttle!
Why do you don’t see any new Colt revolvers? Just like all the rest, you can give thanks the Unions for that doing what they do best, putting their own selfish interests before the company. Right when Colt needed the cash to fight the Goons from Clintons Sarah Braden and city suing the firearms manufacturers, the Machinist Union just had to show there butt and walk out causing Colt to fold under the pressure and guess what, they lost their job because of it!
The bottom line is this; years ago the Owner of a European Gun Manufacturer was right when he was asked what he thought about American Made Guns. His answer, “UNFINISHED!”
What do you here now when you call customer service? Some fella named Johnny from overseas and when it comes to shooting? O’BROTHER, “DON’T GET ME STARTED ON THIS ONE!”
From computers to shooting, The United States has lost the edge on every skill imaginable!
Food for thought, the national average of job performance of an individual being hired is 60%. The reason why skilled workers are laid off because the Company has turned their position into nothing more than warm bodies apply only!! Did you know that Companies pays 3 time more in salary for that one position replacing a person for a position rather than keeping them and giving them a pay raise costing much less.
What did you say bottles up?
NO STUPID,
IT’S TARGETS UP!!!!
Y'all are talking about a lot more rifle than I want for a "walking around rifle". My idea of the perfect WAR is a fondly remembered and often missed Remington Mohawk
in .222 Rem. Light, short, no recoil, dogleg bolt, handy to carry or out of a pickup, and rigged out with a 1 1/2 X 4 all steel Weaver over a see through mount.
One of the cheapest rifles I ever owned, but it accounted for deer, hogs, coyotes, turkeys, small game, varmints and many, many prairie dogs and armidillos. The secret of that little rifle's success was it was a true WAR, always there, always dependable, and always THERE!
Blue-
Wasn't so much the hunting that I did with that little rifle, I just had it with me almost everywhere. In a previous occupation in a better, more gun friendly world, I was able to carry that handy little .222 almost 24/7. When what you shoot is a big part of what your family has to eat, "shots of opportunity" can put a lot of meat on the table. My job called for a lot of time spent in pastures and around stock tanks, hence the shots of opportunity. Almost any farmer or rancher was glad to swap hunting privileges for coyote, armadillo and varmint control. A lot of them knew me, and didn't even bother to ask if I had my gun, it was a given. Some gave advice about where a particular coyote or bobcat could be seen. Like I said, better times in a better world!
Eine wunderbare Waffe ohne Hinweis der westlichen Einfluss. If I had the dollars, I'd have the rifle. Very nice.
My walking 'round the farm gun is a Weatherby Mark XXII - an Annie in disguise. Has the tube mag. Bought it used for short money.
DP - This Country had a War-Time President who also had cowflop experience. His statement for the ages was:
" Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day "
H.S.Truman
( Yuk,Yuk )
I hear ya, crm3006...I handled them, disliked them, and now I wish I had bought a couple of them for my kids. I suppose that some of us figured that nothing would take the place of the .222 in a carryable [is that a word?] rifle. Make that 'portable'. However, Col. Whelen had a thing about all that, didn't he? I am glad to know that Petzel had this experience in his background, too.
It sounds like you did an awful lot of hunting with that rifle. Good memories.
Blue
crm3006....
it sounds like you might have spent a good deal of time in Tejas. Nice state...spent some quality time there, myself, and the .222 on prairie dogs or pests was just the berries. Was your little Remington accurate? I know, 'accurate enough'...but I just have to wonder how the little portable musket did.
I am in Virginia, now, and never see the 'specialist' rifle like the Anshutz, with a relatively skinny barrel, for sale. I wonder if Dieter Anshutz is going to galvanize one of the American or Brazilian gun factories into bringing out the 'walkabout' .222 or .223? I take it you traded your little rifle, in a weak moment?
Blue
2500 bucks for a rifle you have "wrestle with" to get half MOA in this day and age isn't the best way come to the market. The fact that it's anschutz will help it out some, and it is a sharp looking rifle. Not real sure why something as "teutonic as saurkraut farts etc" would be made available with classic american styling...
In my older age, accurate rifles and smooth function fascinate me the most and The Anschutz Model 1770 has my attention! What aggravates me the most, I have to send my Springfield XD45 made in Croatia back to the Springfield Factory for a trigger job. What happened to accuracy and made in the USA has become lost!
To All: The first photo to run here was of the wrong gun. The one that is up as of 8/3 is correct. My Mac was hit by lightning and so I've been offline for a week and had no idea until it was way too late.
Anschutz makes good stuff. Perhaps that is an understatement.
Interesting that the gun in the picture with the open sights and huge scope with low rings and tall "receiver" looks like a Merkel KR1. Perhaps it is the Merkel tag, but it just doesn't look like an Anschutz. Are you breaking in a new intern?
Yeah, we knew you know the difference - was odd for you not to respond so figured something was up. Too bad the pic is probably in digital rather than hardcopy form - you could right on the back, like McClane did for his classic photo, "bonefish you idiot."
So, when are you getting a KR1 to review. Just for the heck of it should show a pic of the 1770 alongside.
DEP-
Great rifle, entertaining to look at, way over my price limit. My Savage 10 in .223 has most of the advantages stated at about $1500 dollars less, but it sadly does not have the Schnabel fore-end. But, it is more accurate! Also, no detachable mag to lose.
Forgot to mention, the Savage 10 is also in left hand configuration.
Blue-
Southern Oklahoma, but the attitudes, climate, wildlife and people are virtually the same. What does a little matter of a Red
River mean, anyway?
I have heard that some of the Mohawks were not particularly accurate, but with factory loads, from the prone, and using sacks of feed for a rest, this one would cloverleaf at a measured 100 yds. Lots of prairie dog pups, (about beer can size) fell to that gun
at about 200 yd., more or less, and one never to be forgotten shot on a coyote at 297 steps. Longest shot I ever took with it.
Knocked squirrels out of trees (open sights)and even shot bullfrogs if I didn't have a .22 handy. I never shot on a range in those days except for military, but judging by performance, that little 600 was the exception to the rule. It seemed to have a little thicker or heavier barrel than some I have seen. Regrettably, I lost it in the divorce wars, just wasn't able to hang on to it. I know where it is now, and the present owner has turned down several offers to part with it.
O Garcia typically a soldier has access to numerous clips which the average hunter probably only one or maybe two. If they are lost or misplaced the hunter be stranded with having a single shot arm that is somewhat difficult to load. Besides why do you require more than 3 to 5 shots from a hunting rifle? I personally have no need for clip fed hunting rifles, defensive guns yes.
Insofar as the scout rifle thing Cooper was way behind the times in suggesting this idea. About 1969 a local Western Auto near where I lived had a Redfield mount and a long eye relief 2.5 x scope that fit in front of the ejection port of a M-94 Winchester. The owner had bought it put it on his personal rifle and then decided it was next to useless. In my niave youth I convinced myself that it was the very thing I required for my M-94. I bought it and installed the whole deal on my rifle but did not consider calling it a scout rifle as it was my deer rifle. It was handy to carry since the scope was not in the way of my hand holding the rifle by the receiver but it was ill balanced. It also was not better than the iron sights that came on the old Winchester or a good peep when the buck approached. I removed the whole affair and returned it to the dealer just as he had said I could when I bought it due to the same reasons that he didn't like it. The mount and scope may still be there in that old store if it is still standing.
To me, it is not a "pretty" rifle. I would have to get my hands on one and shoot it some to pass judgement though. Still, regarding the price, I will just keep my Remingtons, Marlins, etc.
Sure would like the scope though.
That makes me feel better. I thought you had horrible taste. The new rifle is truly handsome. Now, am I the only user who doesn't know what an umlaut is?
To Blueridge,
It's the II-WW German Army sniper patch (eagle head & oak leaves). The current patch is exactly the same with a small German flag added to the lower side of the oval.
If it's anything like the 1712, then it fits like an old trusty work glove that never lets you down. Then it will shoot easily a 1/2 moa with good loads. It does look like it does not have the monte carlo comb, which is the icing on the cake for me. Annies are top notch, so much so that if any of you go look at the hunter class at a smallbore silhouette match, more than half the line will have an annie 1712. I would for sure own one of these if I had a wad of cash to blow.
I truly believe that walking around shooting groundhogs with a .222 Remington was what made me a better than average game shot. Walking up groundhogs led to all types of shots at different ranges. Some close on 'hogs running for their holes and some as far away as I could stretch a .222 and a 6X Weaver. All taken from different rests and positions that made each trip a training session. Nowdays here in Southern Indiana a person could walk many a mile and never see a groundhog but when I was growing up in the 60's it was a different story indeed.
I think I might own your old rifle, rlriggins. It's a Remington 722 in .222 Remington with a 6X Weaver. A classic in every sense of the term.
Dave was kind enough not to show the cheekpiece side of this rifle. If it's anything like the "Bavarian style" CZ's, it would make you weep to see such a waste of fine walnut.
Hey, duckcreekdick and rlriggins...I also own a comparable rifle to this one, but American style---the .222 Remington 722. Still, I love the German/Austrian rifles to a fault, IF I can find one, and IF I can afford it.
I think that Dave has given us more than the rifle to think about in this post...hunting, with a rifle light enough to carry. For years, my favorite for this kind of thing was the little Sako .222, but it kept blowing gases back into my face, so I put it away [traded it]. Dieter Anshutz always has a creative style, and is pushing us to realize there IS a place for the 'walkabout' varmint rifle. Plus, the kids will fight over it when we are gone to Grundsow Himmel.
Thanks, Dave.
Blue
I hear you, Compadre...also spent a while in Oklahoma. Bad woman, good gun, equals a real loss there somewhere. Somewhere, after this Anschutz 1770 is circulated, a guy will be saying, "you take the Chevy, Babe...I'll take the Anschutz." Of course, she will take both.
Hey, Petzel...how about some more on the portable .222/223? You and Dieter Anschutz may have kicked off something here.
Blue
I think it's nice looking. Too expensive, but nice looking. With so many bolts having that same look about them, this is different enough to draw the eyes.
Like my H&K SL-7, I like a slightly different look once in a while.
I gotta say boys; this rile is just to "sterile" for me.
It just doesn't have an American look to it? I guess I'm saying it's not for me, and I hope it does indeed shoot better then it looks!
I must say I do like the stock; REAL WOOD accept no imitations!
fyi--RILE=RIFLE
looks and sounds like a very nice, but expensive rifle. i also agree that with some tuning, the groups could have been shrunk a bit, unless this one was a pooch. i wonder why they opted to use the 223 exclusively. it would seem to me that many varmint hunters would like to have a choice of at least 3 calibers.
Looks like a beautiful gun but way too pricy for me. I'll stick to my 10/22.
I like the styling of the rifle and think it is beatiful in its own way. It's either something you like or hate. I for one would love to have one.The price probably isn't going to go down anytime soon either.
I could never understand what the big deal was over Cooper's scout rifle idea. I see very little in terms of usefulness with such a rifle design. The guy made out to be the best thing since sliced bread but it falls far short in my opinion.
I've never used the international pane or the keyboard viewer that chrishuge suggested to make an umlaut on the Mac, but an easy way to do that without memorizing keystroke combinations is to use the special characters palette. The easiest way to access it is to click the American flag icon at the upper right of your screen. A drop-down menu will appear and one of the selections is "Show Character Palette." Select it and your typesetting world will change for the better.
Here is a video that demonstrates an alternate way of accessing the Characters Palette, but this method isn't available if you're using MS Word on a Mac, or at least not on my version version of Word.
http://www.apple.com/business/theater/#specialcharacters
Great article, Dave. Keep up the good work!
to ishawooa,
thanks for replying.
I somewhat anticipated your answer, and you are right that soldiers and cops often have spare magazines, just in case they run out or accidentally drop the one already loaded in the gun. I'm not really arguing about increased capacity there, after all, detachables on hunting rifles have about the same capacity (even less in some cases) as fixed mags. I'm just curious about why they're avoided, even downright loathed. I understand the biggest issue is with losing them, which never happens with a fixed.
Which reminds me, what happened to that sub-$1,000 Anschutz? Model number escapes me. Oh, sorry, that was a rimfire.
i will keep my ATR in 30.06. the 1770 seems like a great gun but the price tag is little to high for my tastes.
That's a sweet rifle that I did not know was made. And that's the reason I like this blog. I see few rifles that make me lust after them, and this is one of them.
But, the pic is of a merkel.
O Garcia I agree ,. well said.
As to the rifle in question its German,( from Germany )
which in and of itself that says a lot.
Mostly good but in may experiance usually over done.
Its almost grossly expensive given its intended use ,.more over it looks clubby to me.
Unless the bolt housing is really light.
Have shot a number of rifles with Schweinsruken ( sp?) combs ,. which I have come to refer to as
"broke-back mountain stocks"
Which transates to I don't like em
But I like the Schnabel forend
Qualifier: I have not held this partular rifle model.
Then again,.
I can watch people fish on TV
Different strokes I guess
To make an umlaut on a Mac, press option and then the letter on the keyboard. You can also use the "International Pane" in system prefs to turn on the keyboard viewer and see the entire character pallet. Good article by the way. I try to read your articles everyday.
capture your moment in history with the enduring leagacy of art. www.lavinstudio.com
This Anschutz 1770 might be a masterpiece of workmanship but it certainly is one UGLY sucker. No wonder only one is available as they probably can't sell two plus it won't be manufactured in a couple years anyway. Thanks but I would rather have a Cooper, a Montana, a Kimber, a local custom, or maybe even a Darcy if he would make a little rifle, well maybe I wouldn't go so far as to order one of Darcy's expensive pieces of craftsmanship but you get my drift. Certainly a Savage or Shaw is more worthwhile in my opinion. I have a walk around varmint rifle and sometimes wonder why I bought it but then remember its tiny groups. A heavy barrel varmint suits my shooting better as one thing I agree with the cowboys on is "why walk if you can ride".
To DEP,
It would seem that the image used for your blog is not of the 1770, (Merkel ?),
check:http://jga.anschuetz-sport.com/index.php5?produktID=307&direkt=Neuheiten&sprache=1&produktShow=detail.
To Jeff 4066: Congrats on the choice of image you use with your name!!
Hey, Meplat...that image of Jeff 4066...in Pennsylvania Dutch it would be a Distelfink...what is it, if not that?
Blue
CZ modelwhat is it, 527? nice wood nice blue, shoots lights out, weighs 5-6 pounds... 600 bucks or so? I'm not an anti High dollar guy at all either. I just think the CZ is a sharper looking euro rifle that does all that this one does. Of course its not an anschutz...
just for the record i have a lot of high end and expensive rifles in my collection but yet to find any to out shoot my annies (anschutz ) rifles or work as smooth...i have had and replaced my coopers as they had issues and flaws in the action.....did i end up with lemons or are they just over priced asembly line works of junk, my cheep savages worked smoother ....tikka is still my favorite for low priced guns ( another not made in the usa ) for those of you who want a gun that will amaze you on the quality buy an annie (anschutz) its worth it after all you get what you pay for ....you want quality ...... its not cheep!!!!! out of the 40 rifles i own 9 are anschutz .....scopes.....lol don't get me started night force hands down...... i have some 6500 series bushnels and mark 2 tactical, mark 4 tactical scopes for sale...
cz is a good cheep priced gun but has the assembly line flaws as well ( metal filings from the bolt cycling) .removable clips are the way to go as you can unload your rifle with ease ....as for those of you who loose the clips do you still have your mittens attached to you coat with a string as well????
jg anschutz gives you an olympic quality gun in all models ....any other usa manufacture want to step up to the plate..
Post a Comment