


March 02, 2009
Situational Taxidermy
By Kim Hiss

While I'm sure many of us have taxidermy jobs currently on order or in progress (though, I have a tanned antelope hide that I'm still deciding what to do with), I'm sure we're not planning on picking up anything looking like the creations of a handful of contemporary artists who have been re-imagining the craft of "animal stuffing."
This March 1 artinfo.com article discusses many such artists, like Italian Maurizio Cattelan, who's 1996 work Bidibidobidiboo (pictured above) features a squirrel who's decided to end his worldly pains. In another work from 2006, Still Life After Death (rabbit) by English artist Polly Morgan, a magician's top hat is suspended above a curled and "sleeping" white bunny. The link above is worth checking out for its photo gallery of other such works (a hawk perched on a typewriter, a peacock head and torso attached to a kangaroo's legs, etc...).
While the works are certainly arresting and fantastical, I can't quite figure out how I feel about them. Some pieces seem to showcase the animal in a positive (though unconventional) way. But I wonder if others "disrespect the spirit" of the animal -- just the thing that our young potential hunter from last week, Kimmy Czekus, vowed never to do. The lines certainly tend to blur when you're talking about art -K.H.
Comments (16)
You could crap on a canvas and call it art these days. It amazes me what the art community will accept as bonified art. I guess I'm a purest and enjoy a great painting or sculpture.
I think that if you really respected animals you wouldn't make end tables out of an elephants foot or that stuffed raccoon into something to hold your candy dish or business cards. I think this artist is in the dis-respect category.
Yikes, this is a tough one for me. I do like a fair amount of modern art. (There always has been, and always will be bad art. It's not just limited to modern pieces.)
I assume these animals were killed specifically to be used in the artwork (which for me, is a personal no-no. I won't kill anything I'm not going to eat.) They certainly aren't being displayed in a respectful manner either, although I don't know if its really any worse than the hundreds of dust-coated animals I've seen stuffed and molding-away in garages and rec-rooms.
I'm gonna take a pass on this one...
The harrier is interesting, though it is a print. As for the rest, I just can't see them in the typical sportsman's trophy room. Artists resurrecting an old medium to express themselves in new ways, I suppose. Cattelan's works sell for huge prices - to art lovers. At least he has a sense of humor, albeit a bit twisted. Remember the Bremen town musicians, the rooster on the back of a cat, on a dog, on a donkey? Cattelan's version are skeletons.
I suspect that this is not going to reflect well on the hunting community no matter what rationalization is given. I read no where in the linked article that the people doing this actually hunt or understand anything about hunting or the philosophy or values behind it. Beyond that, while I love the jackalope and the armadillo with the beer bottle at Texas Road house, mounting animals in the way these artists are doing just doesn’t seem right to me.
As the old saying goes "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." I've been reminded of tis over and over when attending different functions where some aspiring artist tries to create something miraculous, wonderful in their eye, but to the politically correct crowd it's not good. But they are protected under the constitution, just as we are, and whether we agree or disagree on what the artist has put up, they have every right to do so. With that being said, I feel that some of these creations are blashphemy, disrespecting the animals remains. But PETA won't go after them, because they are artists. But PETA will go after us hunters and fishermen because we aren't artists, we use the remains of our kill to feed and clothe our selves, and do so conservatively, where these artists get out of hand and buy up mass kills to make up handbags, ash trays, endtables, etc.
Bob81, I saw on Polly Morgan's website (which has another interesting photo gallery) that she only works with animals that were either roadkill or donated by a vet after a natural death, but I have no idea what other such artists do. I guess I'm not the only one not totally on board with the suicidal squirrel school of taxidermy. I like to think I'm a reasonable person with a healthy sense of humor and a sufficient appreciation for art, but I'm just not a fan of some of this stuff. -K.H.
Okay, it is hard to be from Wyoming and not love a jackalope (a Wyoming creation!). Maybe even a jackalope playing poker. I am not a big fan of the lamps, etc. made of feet. However, I have seen some beautiful things made of antlers and magnificent mounts made of many animals. I wear antler, walrus ivory, and elk ivory jewelry that are miniature works of art. So I guess that beauty is really in the eye of the beholer/buyer, and deciding if the animal is treated respectully is up the beholder/buyer. It doesen't make it any easier on us hunters though!
there is no reason for some of the things they are doing with these mounts. i guess at some point everything will be desecrated. including the sport we all take seriously and love.
I like jack-a-lopes, but my favorite is the Alabama Swamp Monkey. Has anyone seen one of them?! Do these artsy people know you have to have a valid hunting license to pick up road-kill?
I admire the creativity of some taxidermists but these go a little too far even to call art. My trips to the taxidermist make me smile and these just made me scowl.
When I harvested my first armadillo in Texas we were told about the "mounting it on its back with a Lone Star beer bottle between its feet". I thought, hey that sounds pretty cool. I brought it home and took it to our taxidermist that just raised an eyebrow and said "I will do whatever you want me to do, but..". I have it mounted on a piece of wood, surrounded by brush doing what armadillos do...stand with their noses on the ground. It is a really cool mount.
I had the tooth of my first bear mounted in a gold setting that I had the jewelry store engrave the face of a bear on. It is done very beautifully it honors the animal it came from. (I think he was done with it) lol sorry.
Beauty truely is in the eye of the beholder and we always have the option to look away...or cover it up.
JB
That's certainly different. I'm big on "To Each Their Own", but like mentioned, did they kill these just for their "art" or what?
I like making things from the animals that I've taken. I make Spur Necklaces from Turkey Spurs, I have a pair of turkey feet in the walking position and I have a whole collection of turkey feathers that I use for various things. Deer antlers sit on my tables and some hang from my walls/shelves as places for my to hang items from the tines.
All of that is not what I call art, its more of recycling and reliving my hunts.
More on unusual taxidermy, I got an e-mail forward of a Coyote hanging onto the back of a trucks tailgate. Certainly an attention grabber, but I don't think I'd go as far as to do that.
I totally hear those of you feeling the jackalope pride. I also have plenty of small treasures like the teeth, feathers etc Judy Black and Laura Bell are talking about. Taxidermy aside, I'm big on saving spent cartridge casings as well. If I'm lucky enough to find them afterwards, I'll write the date and 'event' on the side and keep them in a box. I made a necklace out of the first two .22 casings I shot. -K.H.
I also am from Wyoming and agree that Jacee pretty well summed up this blog. The only thing wrong with antler art, chandeliers, lamps, etc. is the astronomical price attached to most of them. Now you can get a guy in Billings to make up a set of mule deer antlers almost any size and shape you desire. Your taxidermist simply attaches them to your little 4 x 4 mulie and immediately your friends see that you are a great hunter/huntress. Sort of takes something out of it doesn't it?
Post a Comment
Okay, it is hard to be from Wyoming and not love a jackalope (a Wyoming creation!). Maybe even a jackalope playing poker. I am not a big fan of the lamps, etc. made of feet. However, I have seen some beautiful things made of antlers and magnificent mounts made of many animals. I wear antler, walrus ivory, and elk ivory jewelry that are miniature works of art. So I guess that beauty is really in the eye of the beholer/buyer, and deciding if the animal is treated respectully is up the beholder/buyer. It doesen't make it any easier on us hunters though!
You could crap on a canvas and call it art these days. It amazes me what the art community will accept as bonified art. I guess I'm a purest and enjoy a great painting or sculpture.
I think that if you really respected animals you wouldn't make end tables out of an elephants foot or that stuffed raccoon into something to hold your candy dish or business cards. I think this artist is in the dis-respect category.
Yikes, this is a tough one for me. I do like a fair amount of modern art. (There always has been, and always will be bad art. It's not just limited to modern pieces.)
I assume these animals were killed specifically to be used in the artwork (which for me, is a personal no-no. I won't kill anything I'm not going to eat.) They certainly aren't being displayed in a respectful manner either, although I don't know if its really any worse than the hundreds of dust-coated animals I've seen stuffed and molding-away in garages and rec-rooms.
I'm gonna take a pass on this one...
The harrier is interesting, though it is a print. As for the rest, I just can't see them in the typical sportsman's trophy room. Artists resurrecting an old medium to express themselves in new ways, I suppose. Cattelan's works sell for huge prices - to art lovers. At least he has a sense of humor, albeit a bit twisted. Remember the Bremen town musicians, the rooster on the back of a cat, on a dog, on a donkey? Cattelan's version are skeletons.
I suspect that this is not going to reflect well on the hunting community no matter what rationalization is given. I read no where in the linked article that the people doing this actually hunt or understand anything about hunting or the philosophy or values behind it. Beyond that, while I love the jackalope and the armadillo with the beer bottle at Texas Road house, mounting animals in the way these artists are doing just doesn’t seem right to me.
Bob81, I saw on Polly Morgan's website (which has another interesting photo gallery) that she only works with animals that were either roadkill or donated by a vet after a natural death, but I have no idea what other such artists do. I guess I'm not the only one not totally on board with the suicidal squirrel school of taxidermy. I like to think I'm a reasonable person with a healthy sense of humor and a sufficient appreciation for art, but I'm just not a fan of some of this stuff. -K.H.
I like jack-a-lopes, but my favorite is the Alabama Swamp Monkey. Has anyone seen one of them?! Do these artsy people know you have to have a valid hunting license to pick up road-kill?
I admire the creativity of some taxidermists but these go a little too far even to call art. My trips to the taxidermist make me smile and these just made me scowl.
When I harvested my first armadillo in Texas we were told about the "mounting it on its back with a Lone Star beer bottle between its feet". I thought, hey that sounds pretty cool. I brought it home and took it to our taxidermist that just raised an eyebrow and said "I will do whatever you want me to do, but..". I have it mounted on a piece of wood, surrounded by brush doing what armadillos do...stand with their noses on the ground. It is a really cool mount.
I had the tooth of my first bear mounted in a gold setting that I had the jewelry store engrave the face of a bear on. It is done very beautifully it honors the animal it came from. (I think he was done with it) lol sorry.
Beauty truely is in the eye of the beholder and we always have the option to look away...or cover it up.
JB
That's certainly different. I'm big on "To Each Their Own", but like mentioned, did they kill these just for their "art" or what?
I like making things from the animals that I've taken. I make Spur Necklaces from Turkey Spurs, I have a pair of turkey feet in the walking position and I have a whole collection of turkey feathers that I use for various things. Deer antlers sit on my tables and some hang from my walls/shelves as places for my to hang items from the tines.
All of that is not what I call art, its more of recycling and reliving my hunts.
More on unusual taxidermy, I got an e-mail forward of a Coyote hanging onto the back of a trucks tailgate. Certainly an attention grabber, but I don't think I'd go as far as to do that.
I totally hear those of you feeling the jackalope pride. I also have plenty of small treasures like the teeth, feathers etc Judy Black and Laura Bell are talking about. Taxidermy aside, I'm big on saving spent cartridge casings as well. If I'm lucky enough to find them afterwards, I'll write the date and 'event' on the side and keep them in a box. I made a necklace out of the first two .22 casings I shot. -K.H.
As the old saying goes "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." I've been reminded of tis over and over when attending different functions where some aspiring artist tries to create something miraculous, wonderful in their eye, but to the politically correct crowd it's not good. But they are protected under the constitution, just as we are, and whether we agree or disagree on what the artist has put up, they have every right to do so. With that being said, I feel that some of these creations are blashphemy, disrespecting the animals remains. But PETA won't go after them, because they are artists. But PETA will go after us hunters and fishermen because we aren't artists, we use the remains of our kill to feed and clothe our selves, and do so conservatively, where these artists get out of hand and buy up mass kills to make up handbags, ash trays, endtables, etc.
there is no reason for some of the things they are doing with these mounts. i guess at some point everything will be desecrated. including the sport we all take seriously and love.
I also am from Wyoming and agree that Jacee pretty well summed up this blog. The only thing wrong with antler art, chandeliers, lamps, etc. is the astronomical price attached to most of them. Now you can get a guy in Billings to make up a set of mule deer antlers almost any size and shape you desire. Your taxidermist simply attaches them to your little 4 x 4 mulie and immediately your friends see that you are a great hunter/huntress. Sort of takes something out of it doesn't it?
Post a Comment