Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Next Chapters

April 24, 2009

Next Chapters

It's hard to know where to begin. Your support has been nothing short of overwhelming, and I still can't come up with a way to sufficiently express how much it's meant to me. I'm very glad the blog has become a place of so much heart and energy, and I'm sure all that enthusiasm for getting more women and kids -- and men for that matter -- into the field will continue throughout the F&S Web site. 

On the bright side, there certainly is life beyond FSHuntress, and on a personal level I'm looking forward to more writing -- including a feature in F&S magazine this July (spoiler alert -- it involves bass fishing and Greyhound buses).

And The Huntress Club message board is up and ready for stories, debates--whatever. So I hope all this great energy can transfer there. 

Again, thank you so, SO much for your support, both for me and for your fellow readers. This is a wonderful community, and I'm looking forward to keeping in touch through the pages of F&S, and elsewhere on the Web site -- not to mention keeping in touch next week when I continue to post through the end of the month. -K.H. 

 

Comments (14)

Top Rated
All Comments
from 60256 wrote 29 weeks 6 days ago

I can start off by saying that i sympathize with all that use this specific blog often, and i like some of the articles, too, but this seems familiar. F&S decided to test a new blog, and it worked well for awhile, but now it just isn't generating as much interest.
At the same time that i am saddened, i can see where F&S is coming from with this.
Think about it, David Petzal's blogs gets 60-70 comments every time, but this blog gets 20 on a good one.
I would like to see it back, though.
It was a good idea to put it on the message board, though.

Nate

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 29 weeks 6 days ago

Gents, can we help the ladies out with this? I've seen some good discussions come out of here. I just subscribed to the paper magazine for the first time in a few years and sent a letter to the editors stating my disappointment that they cut this due to funding and that its loss spurred me to re-subscribe. Interest and numbers are what it's all about and enough of an outpouring might carry the day. Admittedly the topics aren't always of direct interest to me, but I want there to be a community for my daughters to share thier thoughts on if they wish. They are always welcome to post on the other forums of course, but women do make up a small fraction of our outdoors family and I can see why they'd want targeted content.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from teufelhunden wrote 29 weeks 6 days ago

You miss the point Nate, the 60-70 responses Petzal gets are generally from men such as you and I. The 20 or 15 or 10 or 1 that responds to this blog is more than likely a female or someone interested in bringing a female into the outdoor community. As men we respond to Petzal with arguments from opinion or experience, those that responded to this blog were showing an interest in getting outdoors or looking for a way to welcome their wives or daughters into the outdoors. I believe that that was/is a more lofty goal and more likely to save our sport in the future.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 29 weeks 5 days ago

I agree with the devil dog. Considering how many times we draw less than civil responses on the male dominated blogs, I can see how a nice lady interested in learning would steer clear.
And thanks for serving, Sir.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 29 weeks 5 days ago

jcarlin there absolutely is something you can do. You have already written the editors and that is awesome! Go back to the Home Stretch blog and look at the post at the bottom that has the email address for Gerber Knives. I will choose an advertiser from the mag every day and post contact info. Email them and tell them that F&S's decision is eroding the value of their marketing investment by reducing the number of people who will view their ads in the mag. You can also go to the Message Board and post your support to the "Ladies in distress" thread that asks people to show their support by their willingness to pay a bit more for subsciptions if they keep the blog.
We need to fight this and not just give in to a feeling of helplessness. The people have power! Use it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 29 weeks 5 days ago

I liked Huntress because it was fresh and new. Kim always answered back to the posters which was nice. I still think F&S has their head up their collective axes on this as I'm sure most of you do. I'd rather read about someones first experiences as a hunter or a angler way more than reading the same OLD BORING STORIES about $16,000.00 rifles that no one can afford or want and the same ole debates about baiting and crossbows and 30-06 vs 270 that keep coming up over and over again. F&S needs to pursue the NEW VOICES in the sporting world, if we want to hear the same ole we'll look it up in the archives.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 29 weeks 3 days ago

It deeply saddens me to see you go but there is light at the end of the tunnel, through message boards, you will still be alive and well and still play a big role in Field and Stream. I hope all is well and that maybe even they re-consider their decision. I have already written a letter asking them to please re-thing their decision. Although I know I might have no say, a little part of me hopes that if enough letters are sent, they will get the message.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntgrrl wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

I was featured in the F&S magazine when they flew the article on women hunters, and I regret not getting involved in the huntress forum. I am now working on my MS studying game birds and although I am very busy with work I spend a great deal of time thinking about the future of hunting. Throughout college I have encountered a fair amount of opposition to my lifestyle and passion, hunting is a very important part of my life! Although I was encouraged and given many opportunities in the field growing up, many women did not recieve the same support. In fact, those that are interested find that getting in to hunting is an intimidating concept. They are often treated with disrespect in the field, in hunting oriented stores, as well as in the media. Blogs like the huntress make the exploration and participation in hunting, fishing and the outdoors more accessible to them. I think that if F&S is truely concerned about the future of hunting in our society (and their future financial stability as a hunting and fishing based publication) it would be a very foolish decision on their part to eliminate the huntress blog. In addition, think of the message that F&S is sending to women by eliminating this Blog. "You are too unimportant to us, we cannot spare you this little portion of the website...we will be fine without you." Out of curiosity I came on here today and was sickened to hear that this forum was to be removed, although not an avid participant...I know the importance of including women to ensure the future of hunting in our society. For all generations, show some respect and reconsider the removal of this blog! Please, and thank you.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Good grief what's with all the cyber tears and first name basis'? You guys are getting a little to serious about this. Step back and take it into perspective. Business is business.

-4 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

That is a noble sentiment there hunt_fish_sleep. Clearly you care a lot about your community and other people. Please go back to sleep and let those of us who think injustice and corporate insensitivity are worth fighting keep trying.
Business is business, really? More stupidity and shortsightedness have been justified with that phrase than perhaps any other in the history of mankind.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

The advertiser of the day is Simms, the people who make waders, boots, clothing, etc. You can send an email to them at info@simmsfishing.com . Please email them and let them know that a publication where they spend their marketing money is contemplating a decision that is very likely to make those dollars less effective. I know a lot of people are likely to cancel or not renew subscriptions to F&S if they follow through thereby decreasing the exposure to the ads that Simms pays for.
Include the words Save The Huntress in the subject line of the email so they know what we are talking about.
Rally up! I already sent mine.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

You are right hunt-fish-sleep. Business is business. Demographically speaking the female hunter is the fastest growing segment of the outdoors market. It makes perfectly good sense to get rid of the Huntress(?)

I think it was 1999 when Outdoor Life turned from a hunting rag into a snowboard/mountain biking yuppie magazine. How long did that last? These bozos have made mistakes in the past.

The winner in the end with outdoor publications will have a majority of the female market locked up and will reap the benefits of the "Huntress Boom" waiting to happen in the future.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Kim, what will become of you?

Please know that I think F&S's decision to eliminate your blog is an act of greedy, sexist, cowardly corporate stupidity, and I've said so in print (now for the third time) on this blog and on a F&S message board. (Will F&S's corporate cretins read it? Or are they too arrogant and stupid to feel a critical foundation of their economic existence--us readers and subscribers of F&S--shifting like loose sand out from beneath them?)

Truth: Nothing makes me happier than to see my daughter at ease in the wilds, enjoying the beauty around her, absorbing the glories and wonders of our natural world.

It doesn't matter to me if she ever takes a shot with any of her three rifles--though she is an excellent shot.

It doesn't matter to me if we ever catch a fish--for we are both hopelessly inept fisherpersons who end up laughing like hell while the fish throw the hooks, evade us, and generally kick our collective ass.

What does matter to me is that your blog enabled me to break ice with my teenage daughter in a time where she doesn't want to talk to either of her divorced parents very often, and it helped get both her and I out in the wilds together, and happily, time and again.

That's worth far more to me (and, I suspect, to 99% of the readers here) than any corporate buck ever earned, wasted, bribed, bought or soul-sold-for, anywhere and anytime in this country.

So my thanks to you, Huntress. Keep up your writing. Keep in touch with us, your loyal readers. And know that we're on your side and that we'll continue to stand by you--even as we also tell F&S's corporate cretins to take a long hike . . . and not bother to return from it.

I ask again: What will become of you?

T.W. Davidson

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from chadian wrote 15 weeks 17 hours ago

capture your moment in history with the enduring leagacy of art. chad lavin studio. www.lavinstudio.com

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from teufelhunden wrote 29 weeks 6 days ago

You miss the point Nate, the 60-70 responses Petzal gets are generally from men such as you and I. The 20 or 15 or 10 or 1 that responds to this blog is more than likely a female or someone interested in bringing a female into the outdoor community. As men we respond to Petzal with arguments from opinion or experience, those that responded to this blog were showing an interest in getting outdoors or looking for a way to welcome their wives or daughters into the outdoors. I believe that that was/is a more lofty goal and more likely to save our sport in the future.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from huntgrrl wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

I was featured in the F&S magazine when they flew the article on women hunters, and I regret not getting involved in the huntress forum. I am now working on my MS studying game birds and although I am very busy with work I spend a great deal of time thinking about the future of hunting. Throughout college I have encountered a fair amount of opposition to my lifestyle and passion, hunting is a very important part of my life! Although I was encouraged and given many opportunities in the field growing up, many women did not recieve the same support. In fact, those that are interested find that getting in to hunting is an intimidating concept. They are often treated with disrespect in the field, in hunting oriented stores, as well as in the media. Blogs like the huntress make the exploration and participation in hunting, fishing and the outdoors more accessible to them. I think that if F&S is truely concerned about the future of hunting in our society (and their future financial stability as a hunting and fishing based publication) it would be a very foolish decision on their part to eliminate the huntress blog. In addition, think of the message that F&S is sending to women by eliminating this Blog. "You are too unimportant to us, we cannot spare you this little portion of the website...we will be fine without you." Out of curiosity I came on here today and was sickened to hear that this forum was to be removed, although not an avid participant...I know the importance of including women to ensure the future of hunting in our society. For all generations, show some respect and reconsider the removal of this blog! Please, and thank you.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 29 weeks 6 days ago

Gents, can we help the ladies out with this? I've seen some good discussions come out of here. I just subscribed to the paper magazine for the first time in a few years and sent a letter to the editors stating my disappointment that they cut this due to funding and that its loss spurred me to re-subscribe. Interest and numbers are what it's all about and enough of an outpouring might carry the day. Admittedly the topics aren't always of direct interest to me, but I want there to be a community for my daughters to share thier thoughts on if they wish. They are always welcome to post on the other forums of course, but women do make up a small fraction of our outdoors family and I can see why they'd want targeted content.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 29 weeks 5 days ago

I liked Huntress because it was fresh and new. Kim always answered back to the posters which was nice. I still think F&S has their head up their collective axes on this as I'm sure most of you do. I'd rather read about someones first experiences as a hunter or a angler way more than reading the same OLD BORING STORIES about $16,000.00 rifles that no one can afford or want and the same ole debates about baiting and crossbows and 30-06 vs 270 that keep coming up over and over again. F&S needs to pursue the NEW VOICES in the sporting world, if we want to hear the same ole we'll look it up in the archives.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

Kim, what will become of you?

Please know that I think F&S's decision to eliminate your blog is an act of greedy, sexist, cowardly corporate stupidity, and I've said so in print (now for the third time) on this blog and on a F&S message board. (Will F&S's corporate cretins read it? Or are they too arrogant and stupid to feel a critical foundation of their economic existence--us readers and subscribers of F&S--shifting like loose sand out from beneath them?)

Truth: Nothing makes me happier than to see my daughter at ease in the wilds, enjoying the beauty around her, absorbing the glories and wonders of our natural world.

It doesn't matter to me if she ever takes a shot with any of her three rifles--though she is an excellent shot.

It doesn't matter to me if we ever catch a fish--for we are both hopelessly inept fisherpersons who end up laughing like hell while the fish throw the hooks, evade us, and generally kick our collective ass.

What does matter to me is that your blog enabled me to break ice with my teenage daughter in a time where she doesn't want to talk to either of her divorced parents very often, and it helped get both her and I out in the wilds together, and happily, time and again.

That's worth far more to me (and, I suspect, to 99% of the readers here) than any corporate buck ever earned, wasted, bribed, bought or soul-sold-for, anywhere and anytime in this country.

So my thanks to you, Huntress. Keep up your writing. Keep in touch with us, your loyal readers. And know that we're on your side and that we'll continue to stand by you--even as we also tell F&S's corporate cretins to take a long hike . . . and not bother to return from it.

I ask again: What will become of you?

T.W. Davidson

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 29 weeks 5 days ago

jcarlin there absolutely is something you can do. You have already written the editors and that is awesome! Go back to the Home Stretch blog and look at the post at the bottom that has the email address for Gerber Knives. I will choose an advertiser from the mag every day and post contact info. Email them and tell them that F&S's decision is eroding the value of their marketing investment by reducing the number of people who will view their ads in the mag. You can also go to the Message Board and post your support to the "Ladies in distress" thread that asks people to show their support by their willingness to pay a bit more for subsciptions if they keep the blog.
We need to fight this and not just give in to a feeling of helplessness. The people have power! Use it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jcarlin wrote 29 weeks 5 days ago

I agree with the devil dog. Considering how many times we draw less than civil responses on the male dominated blogs, I can see how a nice lady interested in learning would steer clear.
And thanks for serving, Sir.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 29 weeks 3 days ago

It deeply saddens me to see you go but there is light at the end of the tunnel, through message boards, you will still be alive and well and still play a big role in Field and Stream. I hope all is well and that maybe even they re-consider their decision. I have already written a letter asking them to please re-thing their decision. Although I know I might have no say, a little part of me hopes that if enough letters are sent, they will get the message.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

That is a noble sentiment there hunt_fish_sleep. Clearly you care a lot about your community and other people. Please go back to sleep and let those of us who think injustice and corporate insensitivity are worth fighting keep trying.
Business is business, really? More stupidity and shortsightedness have been justified with that phrase than perhaps any other in the history of mankind.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

The advertiser of the day is Simms, the people who make waders, boots, clothing, etc. You can send an email to them at info@simmsfishing.com . Please email them and let them know that a publication where they spend their marketing money is contemplating a decision that is very likely to make those dollars less effective. I know a lot of people are likely to cancel or not renew subscriptions to F&S if they follow through thereby decreasing the exposure to the ads that Simms pays for.
Include the words Save The Huntress in the subject line of the email so they know what we are talking about.
Rally up! I already sent mine.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 29 weeks 1 day ago

You are right hunt-fish-sleep. Business is business. Demographically speaking the female hunter is the fastest growing segment of the outdoors market. It makes perfectly good sense to get rid of the Huntress(?)

I think it was 1999 when Outdoor Life turned from a hunting rag into a snowboard/mountain biking yuppie magazine. How long did that last? These bozos have made mistakes in the past.

The winner in the end with outdoor publications will have a majority of the female market locked up and will reap the benefits of the "Huntress Boom" waiting to happen in the future.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from chadian wrote 15 weeks 17 hours ago

capture your moment in history with the enduring leagacy of art. chad lavin studio. www.lavinstudio.com

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 60256 wrote 29 weeks 6 days ago

I can start off by saying that i sympathize with all that use this specific blog often, and i like some of the articles, too, but this seems familiar. F&S decided to test a new blog, and it worked well for awhile, but now it just isn't generating as much interest.
At the same time that i am saddened, i can see where F&S is coming from with this.
Think about it, David Petzal's blogs gets 60-70 comments every time, but this blog gets 20 on a good one.
I would like to see it back, though.
It was a good idea to put it on the message board, though.

Nate

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from hunt_fish_sleep wrote 29 weeks 2 days ago

Good grief what's with all the cyber tears and first name basis'? You guys are getting a little to serious about this. Step back and take it into perspective. Business is business.

-4 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment