Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

SHOT Show Report: Browning X-Bolt and Winchester Model 1894

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 19, 2010

SHOT Show Report: Browning X-Bolt and Winchester Model 1894

By Jay Cassell

A guest post by Field & Stream Deputy Editor Jay Cassell

The day before the SHOT show doors open is the fun day, the day writers and editors get to go to area ranges and shoot all the new guns being offered by firearms manufacturers from across the planet. This year, I attended the annual Browning-Winchester event, held at the Desert Rifle and Pistol Sportsman’s Club 45 minutes outside of Las Vegas. Two guns in particular attracted my interest.

The first I wanted to check out was the Browning X-Bolt. The gun has won quite a few rewards in recent years, and has been touted for its incredible accuracy. I wanted to check it out for myself. Picking up a black, synthetic-stocked 300 Win Mag, I fed a cartridge in the chamber, settled down at the bench with the rifle in a Lead Sled, took aim at bowling pin hanging from a scaffold 100 yards away , and hit it dead on. My next ten shots all hit that pin, plus one at the 200-yard mark. When I picked up the gun and shot offhand, I didn’t hit every one, but enough to make me happy. Recoil was mild, and the gun just felt good in hand. Retail price is $939 – practically a steal.

The second was the Winchester 94 – yes, I mean it, the Model 1894 lever action rifle that was first developed by John Browning in – well, let’s see if you can guess when it came out. But, the Winchester Repeating Arms Company is bringing out the gun now because it commemorates the 200th birthday of Oliver Winchester.

The gun I shot, the High Grade, is a 30-30 (what else would you even consider for a lever action?), with delicate scroll work, featuring the early Winchester Repeating Arms crest on one side of the receiver and the words “Two Hundred Years, Oliver F. Winchester,” on the other. The walnut stock has a high gloss finish and is delicately checkered.

At the range, the gun shot almost effortlessly, cycling rounds through quickly and smoothly. More than 6 million 94s have been sold since the gun first came out. With this sweet model, I’m predicting a lot more will be sold. Suggested price for the High Grade in s $1469. – Jay Cassell

Comments (25)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Jerry A. wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Welcome back Winchester Model 94. A classic never really goes out of style.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunter Savage wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

its about time they brought the 94 back

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from PbHead wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Thanks for the info Jay. Did Dave get kidnapped by irate Booth Babes? Who would pay the ransom? Keep us posted.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I'm all for bringing back the 94 if it's manufactured the same as the original.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from cliff68 wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the Model 94 back but wish they would make it in a standard configuration. It will also be tough to look at the made in Japan rollmark.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I wish I still had my Winchester 94. That was back when they were ALL pre-64's! LOL Traded it for one of those sexy Ruger .44 carbines, which I thought was cool at the time. What did I know.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joel Panian wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Three cheers for the return of the 94!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Do you have to pay $1.5K to get one that will group worth diddly? Alot of those 94s from the 70s, 80s and 90s aren't worth a doughnut.

How did the action feel on the X-bolt? I examined a couple of Brownings last week at a Sportsmans Warehouse and not sure which model they were but the actions were the most clackety, cheap feeling things I'd ever held in a bolt action. To me an action should be smooth, with no horizontal or vertical play.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I have a 1951 model 94 carbine. They will have to work hard to make a sweeter lever gun than that. At the $$$ figure of the new one there you are in the ballpark to buy a real decent old one. HMMMMMMM.......

I'm glad for you the X-bolt was impressive. Maybe they have done something different with the newest run of those. I agree with Diehl's take, and the 'modern' styling is a loser for me too.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Plotner wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

wow thats a lot for a lever gun think they could make it cheper lik $250-$500? i would like to have on if they could be in a 12 year olds price rang!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I never cared for the A-Bolt either, personally. Not because they are not a nice rifle, they just don't suit me. Several of my friends hunt with them and I wish they weren't so darn accurate. I would rather hunt than help them drag....

I like my slick Savage 99's better than the Win 94. The Win 94 is classier looking, but usually not as slick or accurate the the 99's. JMHO, although the 94 is great, too!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

None of these guns ring my bell. Though if money grew on trees I would like to buy the lever gun just to have one.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

The 94 is a great piece of history and should continue to be made with pride in the USA. The one i own was probably only good for 50% of that, made in the '80's in the US but the craftmanship is lacking. My brother has one from the '30 that is sweet with a silky action and great fit and finish. I do not currently own any Brownings, but have always thought them to be quality. I do not like the lines of the new X-bolt, personally, but i cannot comment on it's quality having never handled one yet.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

The first high powered rifle I ever owned many years ago ( over 50) was a Model 94 32 Winchester Special. I traded the gun for another gun later on and I have regreted it ever since. I was in the Air Force then and don't have any idea where the gun was headed. If I knew I would try to get the rifle back. The new 94 looks great and it just might replace the other 94 I had.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

So Jay,

Where exactly is this new wonder 94 actually manufactured? Miroku/Browning in Japan or in Turkey with the SXP?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from blackdawgz wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Everybody wants a '94. I've owned them over the years. Quality has varied widely. It would seem that Winchester would be required to produce pre-'64 quality and sell them at whatever price. Required medical insurance? Required Winchester '94's. The government should intervene.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I wish Winchester well with their new model "94". I got one in 1963 and passed it on to my son this past "09" deer season. I believe it would be a better market though if they made the gun more affordable.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JD wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

Wam,
The M94 is made in Japan at Miroku/Browning, at least for now. Reportedly the action is quite smooth and the fit and finish very good. Can't wait for the field models to get out too, although I still am waiting for an 1892 Carbine as well, .44 mag 20" bbl at an affordable price.

I wouldn't be concerned about the SXP coming from Turkey, since Weatherby's pumps and semi auto shotguns are also produced there. Granted, we'd all like each gun to come from the USA but just like everything else, it is a global economy nowdays (sigh)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

JD

If it's made at Miroku, it will have fine fit and finish to be sure. I'm not shunning guns made offshore. It's all about the OEM specs and how rigorouly quality control standards are followed.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't trade my 1949-1950 Model 94 for two of the new ones. Shoots good and don't have a stinkin' "lawyer safety".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WhitetailHunter706 wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

how bout that but at that price my older 94 is as good as it could be

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Kris Conner wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Ultimately the sales will tell how people really feel. Personally I have always liked the 94 and consider it to be a classic. While there are other lever guns that can be purchased for less money and are fantastic shooters there is something special about walking through the woods with a 94. While I have to say that they are bringing back some very desirable features such as the crescent butt plate and the half round barrel I have to say that this is not a gun I will be buying. My choice is not because of the money but instead about where it is made. I own other weapons from foreign countries and most are excellent shooters with good fit and finish. A few of the cars I own are even made outside of the US and I like them very much. This is about an American icon that regardless of quality has been cheapened by the very namesake that founded it. There are already choices for those who want a foreign made Winchester replica let them handle a replica 94 market. I was equally disappointed with the other models that are being produced in Japan. A few years ago when the 1895 was re-released I was very excited until I actually got one in my hands and after a few minutes of bliss I saw the made in Japan roll mark and was practically grief stricken. As a comparison if GM where to announce that they were going to build a Corvette that was built in another country but got better gas mileage or would have a lower MSRP would you still want it? I hope that someone a Winchester reads this post and as I said in the beginning ultimately the sales will tell the story but if this is the only way that Winchester can produce this gun at a profit and if our choice as consumers is this or nothing then I personally choose nothing. I say let this American legend be made by Americans and if the cost is too high to make it a viable option then make a responsible corporate decision and retire it from production permanently.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from cas0905 wrote 1 year 51 weeks ago

cant wait to get my hands on an x-bolt

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from kingfsher23 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I just purchased a Browning X-Bolt 30.06 a couple days ago and sighted it in today. I have a Vortex Optics 3.5x10x50mm Diamondback scope and I'm using Federal Premium 165gr. Nosler Ballistic Tip. I guess I'm the odd man out and like the new design look. Looks sleek and it tosses up to my shoulder REAL well. The butt cushion is real nice as well. The best feature of this gun tho is the trigger. No slack, no pressure...I believe it gives me an advantage to consistency. I haven't measured my groupings, thats tomorrow if it doesnt rain, but I couldn't be happier with this rifle. It truly feels like a $1500 rifle for $750. (+230 for the scope...on another topic, y'all should check out Vortex scopes. They're a great value for what you get. Gives Nikon and Leupold a run for their money.)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rsbolander wrote 1 year 43 weeks ago

I have a model 94 with a manufacture date of 1967 that is in very good condition. What is it worth?

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Mike Diehl wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Do you have to pay $1.5K to get one that will group worth diddly? Alot of those 94s from the 70s, 80s and 90s aren't worth a doughnut.

How did the action feel on the X-bolt? I examined a couple of Brownings last week at a Sportsmans Warehouse and not sure which model they were but the actions were the most clackety, cheap feeling things I'd ever held in a bolt action. To me an action should be smooth, with no horizontal or vertical play.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from cliff68 wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the Model 94 back but wish they would make it in a standard configuration. It will also be tough to look at the made in Japan rollmark.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I wish I still had my Winchester 94. That was back when they were ALL pre-64's! LOL Traded it for one of those sexy Ruger .44 carbines, which I thought was cool at the time. What did I know.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I have a 1951 model 94 carbine. They will have to work hard to make a sweeter lever gun than that. At the $$$ figure of the new one there you are in the ballpark to buy a real decent old one. HMMMMMMM.......

I'm glad for you the X-bolt was impressive. Maybe they have done something different with the newest run of those. I agree with Diehl's take, and the 'modern' styling is a loser for me too.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I never cared for the A-Bolt either, personally. Not because they are not a nice rifle, they just don't suit me. Several of my friends hunt with them and I wish they weren't so darn accurate. I would rather hunt than help them drag....

I like my slick Savage 99's better than the Win 94. The Win 94 is classier looking, but usually not as slick or accurate the the 99's. JMHO, although the 94 is great, too!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

None of these guns ring my bell. Though if money grew on trees I would like to buy the lever gun just to have one.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sarge01 wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

The first high powered rifle I ever owned many years ago ( over 50) was a Model 94 32 Winchester Special. I traded the gun for another gun later on and I have regreted it ever since. I was in the Air Force then and don't have any idea where the gun was headed. If I knew I would try to get the rifle back. The new 94 looks great and it just might replace the other 94 I had.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

JD

If it's made at Miroku, it will have fine fit and finish to be sure. I'm not shunning guns made offshore. It's all about the OEM specs and how rigorouly quality control standards are followed.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jerry A. wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Welcome back Winchester Model 94. A classic never really goes out of style.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunter Savage wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

its about time they brought the 94 back

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from PbHead wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Thanks for the info Jay. Did Dave get kidnapped by irate Booth Babes? Who would pay the ransom? Keep us posted.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I'm all for bringing back the 94 if it's manufactured the same as the original.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Joel Panian wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Three cheers for the return of the 94!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Mike Plotner wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

wow thats a lot for a lever gun think they could make it cheper lik $250-$500? i would like to have on if they could be in a 12 year olds price rang!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

The 94 is a great piece of history and should continue to be made with pride in the USA. The one i own was probably only good for 50% of that, made in the '80's in the US but the craftmanship is lacking. My brother has one from the '30 that is sweet with a silky action and great fit and finish. I do not currently own any Brownings, but have always thought them to be quality. I do not like the lines of the new X-bolt, personally, but i cannot comment on it's quality having never handled one yet.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WA Mtnhunter wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

So Jay,

Where exactly is this new wonder 94 actually manufactured? Miroku/Browning in Japan or in Turkey with the SXP?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from blackdawgz wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

Everybody wants a '94. I've owned them over the years. Quality has varied widely. It would seem that Winchester would be required to produce pre-'64 quality and sell them at whatever price. Required medical insurance? Required Winchester '94's. The government should intervene.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 268bull wrote 2 years 3 weeks ago

I wish Winchester well with their new model "94". I got one in 1963 and passed it on to my son this past "09" deer season. I believe it would be a better market though if they made the gun more affordable.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JD wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

Wam,
The M94 is made in Japan at Miroku/Browning, at least for now. Reportedly the action is quite smooth and the fit and finish very good. Can't wait for the field models to get out too, although I still am waiting for an 1892 Carbine as well, .44 mag 20" bbl at an affordable price.

I wouldn't be concerned about the SXP coming from Turkey, since Weatherby's pumps and semi auto shotguns are also produced there. Granted, we'd all like each gun to come from the USA but just like everything else, it is a global economy nowdays (sigh)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't trade my 1949-1950 Model 94 for two of the new ones. Shoots good and don't have a stinkin' "lawyer safety".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Kris Conner wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Ultimately the sales will tell how people really feel. Personally I have always liked the 94 and consider it to be a classic. While there are other lever guns that can be purchased for less money and are fantastic shooters there is something special about walking through the woods with a 94. While I have to say that they are bringing back some very desirable features such as the crescent butt plate and the half round barrel I have to say that this is not a gun I will be buying. My choice is not because of the money but instead about where it is made. I own other weapons from foreign countries and most are excellent shooters with good fit and finish. A few of the cars I own are even made outside of the US and I like them very much. This is about an American icon that regardless of quality has been cheapened by the very namesake that founded it. There are already choices for those who want a foreign made Winchester replica let them handle a replica 94 market. I was equally disappointed with the other models that are being produced in Japan. A few years ago when the 1895 was re-released I was very excited until I actually got one in my hands and after a few minutes of bliss I saw the made in Japan roll mark and was practically grief stricken. As a comparison if GM where to announce that they were going to build a Corvette that was built in another country but got better gas mileage or would have a lower MSRP would you still want it? I hope that someone a Winchester reads this post and as I said in the beginning ultimately the sales will tell the story but if this is the only way that Winchester can produce this gun at a profit and if our choice as consumers is this or nothing then I personally choose nothing. I say let this American legend be made by Americans and if the cost is too high to make it a viable option then make a responsible corporate decision and retire it from production permanently.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from kingfsher23 wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

I just purchased a Browning X-Bolt 30.06 a couple days ago and sighted it in today. I have a Vortex Optics 3.5x10x50mm Diamondback scope and I'm using Federal Premium 165gr. Nosler Ballistic Tip. I guess I'm the odd man out and like the new design look. Looks sleek and it tosses up to my shoulder REAL well. The butt cushion is real nice as well. The best feature of this gun tho is the trigger. No slack, no pressure...I believe it gives me an advantage to consistency. I haven't measured my groupings, thats tomorrow if it doesnt rain, but I couldn't be happier with this rifle. It truly feels like a $1500 rifle for $750. (+230 for the scope...on another topic, y'all should check out Vortex scopes. They're a great value for what you get. Gives Nikon and Leupold a run for their money.)

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WhitetailHunter706 wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

how bout that but at that price my older 94 is as good as it could be

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from cas0905 wrote 1 year 51 weeks ago

cant wait to get my hands on an x-bolt

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rsbolander wrote 1 year 43 weeks ago

I have a model 94 with a manufacture date of 1967 that is in very good condition. What is it worth?

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment