Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Gear Review: Wenger Swiss Raid Commando Watch

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 29, 2010

Gear Review: Wenger Swiss Raid Commando Watch

By Jay Cassell

I’ve been testing out the new Wenger Swiss Raid Commando watch, and I have to tell you, this is one cool timepiece. It’s big and bright, as you can see, but that’s not even the half of it. Among its features: a solid stainless casing treated with a film of ionized ceramic and metal that creates a slick, impervious surface; quartz movement with a 12-hour chronograph function; date display; tachometer (it can measure speed over a known distance) and really bright luminous hands and numerals. It’s also water-resistant down to 100 meters, according to the company, but I can vouch for that. What I can vouch for, after wearing this last deer season in woods from Saskatchewan to New York, is that the chronograph works, the date display works, the tachometer works, and the thing keeps time as only a Swiss watch can. It can also take a bit of a beating, as I’m not exactly easy on watches.

My only beef is that I found the instructions confusing. Maybe an IT guy could figure out the watch’s functions the first time reading the manual, but it took me awhile. Price is $425 – expensive, yes, but hey, you’re getting a cool-looking Swiss watch that will probably outlast you. Wengerna.com—Jay Cassell

Comments (24)

Top Rated
All Comments
from straightshooter wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Cool watch. Of course you wait until AFTER Christmas to tell us about it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I am an automatic/mechanical guy. Right now, I am wearing my dad's old Benrus self-winding he wore in the '50's. But metal watches and bands contribute to chill when in the winter fields and they reflect lots of light. I like the looks of this one. All Black. Polymer band. BIG hands and hour marks. Luminous is excellent but it is also handy to see a 3, 6, and 9 when the watch if off your arm. Might have to break down one day a buy a quartz, but still hope someone comes out with an automatic.

By the way, I know a couple of people that can't wear quartz watches. Something about their body chemistry stops the watch. I also had the same problem years ago - 3 different quartz watches stopped on me in one week. It wasn't the batteries.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Here's my 4 word review; nice watch too pricey

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from tirdypointbuck wrote 2 years 1 week ago

sweet watch

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 2 years 1 week ago

"Commando Watch?" From my meager experience any commando wearing such a bright shiny face will be promptly spotted and picked-off by the enemy. Other than causing your death, it's a great watch.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I retired about four years ago and haven't felt the need to wear a watch since. Amazing how unimportant the time of day is when your time is your own. But, thanks for telling just how very much money I'm saving by not being in the market for a new watch.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hnestle wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Nice watch, but to pricy for a beat around the woods watch for me. I'll stick to my Citizen Choronograph, after 15 years it still looks great.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Nice watch,but I will keep my cheaply obtained, ROLEX I bought in the PX in An Khe Viet Nam in 1966 for $75. Its still works beautifully and I get it serviced every 10 years. They still make the same model ( Their biggest Seller) but it costs over $3,000 now!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Buckhunter, your absolutely right.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from fisherman14 wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Thats a really nice watch but...LOOK AT THAT PRICE!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I'll stick with my Luminox Seal watch. The Wenger is a nice looking watch though.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Goodlooking piece though out of my price-range.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from HunterGreene wrote 2 years 1 week ago

You can buy 10 Timex watches for that price.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I had about 10 timex watches before I got the Rolex, should have bought it sooner.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 1 week ago

But is it magnum recoil proof?

My SEIKO has passed the 44 Mag.

water-resistant down to 100 meters about 330 feet deep? Might have to try it one of these days!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from seneca_slabs wrote 2 years 6 days ago

Good looking watch, but I couldn't bring myself to pay that much.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from tbogg10 wrote 2 years 6 days ago

nice watch, too much money, i use a 10 dollar watch from wal-mart

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from workmandave wrote 1 year 51 weeks ago

Got a timex that cost way less and got me through many years

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from douglasj56 wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

I am surprised that no one mentioned the Casio G- shock. I do love a nice watch for dress ect. But in the Casio you get a solar powered and "atomically" sent signal to it every night from Colorado. It doesn't get more precise than that ! 200 meters water protection and they brag that you can wear it while you jack hammer all day. I got mine at Kohels years ago for I think $86.00.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

Clay, yes it is Waterpoof to 100 Meters too, and I have fired MA Deuce 44 Magnums and a 454 Casul, 375 H&H 458 Win wearing it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

Nice watch for armchair commandos. Too much illumination,
costs too much, and I doubt it will pass the post-hole digger test, which tougher than the magnum recoil test.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

True, the Wenger is more of a toy than a tool.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from AJMcClure wrote 1 year 39 weeks ago

Those big wenger knobs dig into the back of your hand- poor designing.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 1 year 39 weeks ago

Tag

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from buckhunter wrote 2 years 1 week ago

"Commando Watch?" From my meager experience any commando wearing such a bright shiny face will be promptly spotted and picked-off by the enemy. Other than causing your death, it's a great watch.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from jbird wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Here's my 4 word review; nice watch too pricey

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from straightshooter wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Cool watch. Of course you wait until AFTER Christmas to tell us about it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I am an automatic/mechanical guy. Right now, I am wearing my dad's old Benrus self-winding he wore in the '50's. But metal watches and bands contribute to chill when in the winter fields and they reflect lots of light. I like the looks of this one. All Black. Polymer band. BIG hands and hour marks. Luminous is excellent but it is also handy to see a 3, 6, and 9 when the watch if off your arm. Might have to break down one day a buy a quartz, but still hope someone comes out with an automatic.

By the way, I know a couple of people that can't wear quartz watches. Something about their body chemistry stops the watch. I also had the same problem years ago - 3 different quartz watches stopped on me in one week. It wasn't the batteries.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from tirdypointbuck wrote 2 years 1 week ago

sweet watch

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from HunterGreene wrote 2 years 1 week ago

You can buy 10 Timex watches for that price.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sourdough Dave wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I retired about four years ago and haven't felt the need to wear a watch since. Amazing how unimportant the time of day is when your time is your own. But, thanks for telling just how very much money I'm saving by not being in the market for a new watch.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from hnestle wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Nice watch, but to pricy for a beat around the woods watch for me. I'll stick to my Citizen Choronograph, after 15 years it still looks great.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from fisherman14 wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Thats a really nice watch but...LOOK AT THAT PRICE!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Goodlooking piece though out of my price-range.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I had about 10 timex watches before I got the Rolex, should have bought it sooner.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 2 years 1 week ago

But is it magnum recoil proof?

My SEIKO has passed the 44 Mag.

water-resistant down to 100 meters about 330 feet deep? Might have to try it one of these days!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from seneca_slabs wrote 2 years 6 days ago

Good looking watch, but I couldn't bring myself to pay that much.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from tbogg10 wrote 2 years 6 days ago

nice watch, too much money, i use a 10 dollar watch from wal-mart

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from douglasj56 wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

I am surprised that no one mentioned the Casio G- shock. I do love a nice watch for dress ect. But in the Casio you get a solar powered and "atomically" sent signal to it every night from Colorado. It doesn't get more precise than that ! 200 meters water protection and they brag that you can wear it while you jack hammer all day. I got mine at Kohels years ago for I think $86.00.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

Nice watch for armchair commandos. Too much illumination,
costs too much, and I doubt it will pass the post-hole digger test, which tougher than the magnum recoil test.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Nice watch,but I will keep my cheaply obtained, ROLEX I bought in the PX in An Khe Viet Nam in 1966 for $75. Its still works beautifully and I get it serviced every 10 years. They still make the same model ( Their biggest Seller) but it costs over $3,000 now!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 2 years 1 week ago

Buckhunter, your absolutely right.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from JohnR wrote 2 years 1 week ago

I'll stick with my Luminox Seal watch. The Wenger is a nice looking watch though.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from workmandave wrote 1 year 51 weeks ago

Got a timex that cost way less and got me through many years

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

Clay, yes it is Waterpoof to 100 Meters too, and I have fired MA Deuce 44 Magnums and a 454 Casul, 375 H&H 458 Win wearing it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jere Smith wrote 1 year 50 weeks ago

True, the Wenger is more of a toy than a tool.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from AJMcClure wrote 1 year 39 weeks ago

Those big wenger knobs dig into the back of your hand- poor designing.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cgull wrote 1 year 39 weeks ago

Tag

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs