Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Chad Love: Fishing Ban Rumors Debunked

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Field Notes
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

March 12, 2010

Chad Love: Fishing Ban Rumors Debunked

By Chad Love

By now -- unless you live completely off-grid or you've just returned from a two-week yak hunt in the wi-fi-free wilds of Mongolia -- you've probably heard that the Obama Administration is planning to ban fishing as we know it.
 
From ESPNOutdoors.com:
The Obama  administration has ended public input for a federal strategy that could  prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal  areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters. This announcement comes at the  time when the situation supposedly still is "fluid" and the Interagency Ocean  Policy Task Force still hasn't issued its final report on zoning uses of these  waters. Fishing industry insiders, who have negotiated for months with  officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task  force, had grown concerned that the public input would not be taken into  account.

Basically what the story said was that environmental groups which may have an anti-fishing bias have way too much influence on how the Obama administration is  shaping the NOAA's new ocean policy guidelines, and that as a result of that influence recreational fishing opportunities in many  areas were in danger of being shut down as part of these new management  guidelines. 

The story, originally published on the ESPN Outdoors website as straight news, went immediately viral. We're talking Ebola viral. Basically,  everyone went completely ape%*@*. Within hours headlines were proclaiming the end of fishing, pundits were sputtering and chat rooms and message boards were on fire with the news  that the Obama Administration was in league with animal rights organizations  to limit or ban recreational fishing in many areas across the country. 
 
The only problem was, of course, that it wasn't  quite true. The news story wasn't a news story at all, but the opinion of BASS reporter Robert Montgomery. ESPN Outdoors Executive Editor Steve Bowman issued a statement saying "ESPNOutdoors.com inadvertently contributed to a flare-up Tuesday  when we posted the  latest article in a series of stories on President Barack Obama's  newly created Ocean Policy Task Force, a column written by Robert Montgomery,  a conservation writer for BASS since 1985. Regrettably, we made several errors  in the editing and presentation of this installment. Though our series has  included numerous news stories on the topic, this was not one of them -- it  was an opinion piece, and should have been clearly labeled as commentary. And  while our series overall has examined several sides of the topic, this  particular column was not properly balanced and failed to represent contrary  points of view. We have reached out to people on every side of the issue and  reported their points of view -- if they chose to respond -- throughout the  series, but failed to do so in this specific  column."
 
The right thing to do, of course, but said  retraction was about as effective at stemming the speculation as a certain Jerry Jeff Walker tune.

The Obama Administration was quick to point out that it has no such plans. And Trout Unlimited yesterday reiterated what most of those familiar with the situation already knew:
 
Dear TU Supporters:
We wanted to  take a moment to respond to a number of you who have written to us this week  concerning an ESPN piece that appeared on the ESPN Outdoors website about the  draft proposal recently published by the President's Ocean Policy Task Force.  The first sentence in the piece said the following: "The Obama administration  has ended public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S.  citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes,  and even inland
waters."
 
...The confusion over the ESPN  article led the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), the coordinating  entity for federal environmental efforts, and the National Oceanic and  Atmospheric Association (NOAA), to issue the following  statements (from Eric Schwaab, NOAA's Assistant Administrator for  the National Marine Fisheries Service)
 
"The Ocean Policy Task Force has not  recommended a ban on recreational fishing. The draft reports by the Ocean  Policy Task Force do not contain a zoning map and do not establish any  restrictions on recreational fishing, nor make any judgments about whether one  ocean activity or use is better than another. Instead, the reports set up a  policy and framework for effectively managing the many sustainable uses of the  ocean while upholding our responsibility to be stewards of our  oceans, coasts and Great Lakes. As a member of the task force, NOAA  Administrator Dr. Jane Lubchenco, has said, and I echo her on this, that  saltwater recreational fishing is vital to this nation and NOAA is committed  to building a strong partnership with America's saltwater anglers to ensure  that Americans have opportunities to fish sustainably for generations to  come."

"Saltwater recreational fishing matters to me on a personal  level as a recreational fisherman, it matters to millions of Americans who  enjoy this great sport and it matters to our economy. Our most recent economic  report shows it supports a half million jobs and generates $82 billion in  sales each year. NOAA is committed to adopting policies that will ensure that  current and future generations have the opportunity to enjoy the great  tradition of recreational fishing."
 
In our view, there is no evidence that  the Obama Administration intended to use the work of the Ocean Task Force  to undercut marine sport fishing.

 
At least one good thing might have come out of this farce: if the administration wasn't paying attention to the concerns voiced by recreational  anglers before, you can bet it is now. And that's a good thing regardless of who's in office.  

Comments (18)

Top Rated
All Comments
from gman3186 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

they could ban fishing across the whole united states and i would be the first person out there fishing they could take me jail im not gonna stop doing what i love

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

With opinion polls at his lowest since being elected I could not see the President allow such a foolish measure to be considered.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jakenbake wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Completely agree with the last two things Chad says -- no matter who is in power, sportsmen (and sportswomen) need to make sure their voices are heard. If we are silent, there will be nobody to protect our rights.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Easy enough to believe with the Wackos he's appointed and surrounds himself with. Glad its a farce at least for now.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from matouse3 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Thanks for this article Chad.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I certainly agree with your last paragraph.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from texasfirst wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Chad, you can say Montgomery has no reason to cry foul, but as a writer who has covered Gulf coast snapper "conservation" efforts by NOAA and the Pew Environment group, et al, things don't look quite as peachy and safe as you and the NOAA apologists paint them. While the bureaucrats are not going to outlaw recreational fishing outright, consider the real issues here: maritime "sanctuaries" where no fishing at all would be allowed, closed seasons due to "total allowable catch" and so forth, all attributable to VERY POOR SCIENCE and a completely DEAF EAR to the American recreational angler. Some of these groups, like NOAA and Pew, arguably hold anti-angling views. Everything is not peachy, and without trying to "sputter," I nonetheless see the direction in which the current bureaucracy is headed. All I'll say is, don't be complacent, folks.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

THIS IS A TEST..............

THANK YOU!..................

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

And I called my Congressman over this!

YOW!

But at least the word of NO, BUT HELL NO got out if this was real!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

About time they listened to some segment of the American people.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Think this guys. The government is scared of us. End of story. WE, control THEM. We, are the army. They, just organize it. WE stop fighting for them, they lose. They can only take, which we choose to give them. Catch?

And I quote one of my favorite paragraphs from my recent powerpoint on gun control-

"So let’s make this clear. We are NOT saying you’ll be safer if you have a gun, or that you might not get robbed. We are saying something much heavier. We are saying that we need the government to be afraid of its citizens. We want our rulers to think carefully about what they try to take from us. We need to remember that they can only take from us, what we give to them. You see, maybe Mr. John Doe can call the police against a gang banger, but who does he call against the police? We are discussing the idea of the overthrow of the country, and it’s covered under free speech. Isn’t that cool? We can’t trust the government to always be ok with that. We have to trust, well, the Americans all around us."

Anyone with me? *Holds up fishing rod over his head* "From my cold, dead hands!"

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Think this guys. The government is scared of us. End of story. WE, control THEM. We, are the army. They, just organize it. WE stop fighting for them, they lose. They can only take, which we choose to give them. Catch?

And I quote one of my favorite paragraphs from my recent powerpoint on gun control-

"So let’s make this clear. We are NOT saying you’ll be safer if you have a gun, or that you might not get robbed. We are saying something much heavier. We are saying that we need the government to be afraid of its citizens. We want our rulers to think carefully about what they try to take from us. We need to remember that they can only take from us, what we give to them. You see, maybe Mr. John Doe can call the police against a gang banger, but who does he call against the police? We are discussing the idea of the overthrow of the country, and it’s covered under free speech. Isn’t that cool? We can’t trust the government to always be ok with that. We have to trust, well, the Americans all around us."

Anyone with me? *Holds up fishing rod over his head* "From my cold, dead hands!"

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I knew this was ridiculous when I saw it the first time, but people believe what they want to believe, no matter how far fetched. There are elements in this country that will print any libelous notion that blackens the name of people they don't like. And there are other folks who will jump on anything and proclaim it as the wisdom of the heavens, all because it was just what they wanted to hear. How about some common sense people!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill Philips wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Don't be so quick to dismiss what ESPN has been reporting on this story for months - Robert Montgomery has been documenting this threat in a chain of well documented articles. ESPN did not ever report that all fishing was going to be banned - it was a newspaper headline in Charlotte that sensationalized the story.

The same warnings about the administration direction to implement a zoning strategy that has the potential to close fishing access nationwide have also come from the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, American Sportfishing Assn., Coastal Conservation Assn. , Center for Coastal Conservation, Recreational Fishing Alliance and Shimano. Check it out - Field & Stream didn't bother to do so.

Anglers in California know how real the threat is as one coastal prime fishing area after another is closed permanently to angling in order to 'protect' the habitat.

Field and Stream has been AWOL on the White House Ocean Policy story and now they get the facts wrong and look to criticize ESPN and Montgomery for what should be a wake up call to every angler in America. Check out ESPN Outdoors Saltwater for Robert Montgomery's series of articles that explain what is happening and how this threat is not limited to the oceans or coasts and the Great Lakes are also included.

Then take a look at KeepAmericaFishing.org to see what the recreational fishing industry is asking you to do to help stop this threat to fishing. Then make up your own mind about whether Field and Stream or ESPN got it right.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from labrador12 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

This administration has locked up three to five million barrels of oil a day. Oil that can be used by us, and produced by us. Jobs in production, and materials used in production, and transportation etc. I don't trust these guys with doodlysqat. Salazar has halted any offshore drilling for at least 3 years. Don't get me started on ANWR.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from matouse3 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Bill, this isn't a case of whether ESPN or F&S got it right. If you do a little reading you will find that ESPN is completely wrong (and admitted it) and everyone else has shown that they were wrong (including F&S)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill Philips wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

So what did you learn when you checked out what all the major rec fishing groups have been saying on this issue, and the call for angler letters to Congress and the Administration on KeepAmericaFishing.org ? These guys are pros at this stuff. F & S is way behind the curve and you are mistaken in your evaluation.

Check out the California MLPA process in S. Cal. Major fishing regions about to be closed forever to anglers.( details also on KeepAmericaFishing.org.) People who fish and hunt need to stick together on these access issues which are spreading quickly inland, and F & S is not being helpful here. They simply did not do sufficient research, and presented only the administration 'damage control' position, which most likely also influenced ESPN / Disney to issue a retreat statement.

People say, "this can't be true". Ask anglers in S. California if it is , and if they ever thought this could happen to them. Same environmental groups pushing for this on a national basis now.

Those who don't learn from history...

-3 Good Comment? | | Report
from 1Shot2Kills wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

This "wasn't" going to be a complete ban on fishing; instead restrict certain areas to promote fish population growth. Sadly, to many people fish way over their limit and don't get the proper stamps.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

The thing that was over hyped was the public input misquote. All management plans that have a public comment period will eventually have an end to that comment period. The author made it seem as public comment on everything hence forth was going to be banished.

The rest of it is plenty of reason to worry and keep an eye on the people in charge. The affiliations on people in management positions should always be in question. Rarely is straight science used in making management decisions, different user groups and their lobbyist make sure of that. NOAA has the power to **** you up under any number guises. There are groups out there who want nature to only be something that you look at or think about, not a thing you with which you interact.

So was the title of the article misleading, yes. Should we breath a collective sigh of relief and not pay attention to what these agencies are doing or are capable of, no. This is the age we live in when you have to protect every right you have because some group doesn't think you should have it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Updated: March 10, 2010, 3:27 PM ET
Fishing interests rally in Washington

UNITED WE FISH!

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4944255

SHIMANO AMERICAN CORPORATION
News Release

Media contact:
John Mazurkiewicz/Catalyst Marketing – 574/289-1331 – jpmazurk@ameritech.net

For Immediate Release – 10/5/09
FEDS TO 60 MILLION AMERICAN ANGLERS:
WE DON’T NEED YOU

IRVINE, Calif. USA – October 5, 2009 – A recently published administration document outlines a structure that could result in closures of sport fishing in salt and freshwater areas across America. The White House created an Interagency Oceans Policy Task Force in June and gave them only 90 days to develop a comprehensive federal policy for all U.S. coastal, ocean and Great Lakes waters. Under the guise of ‘protecting’ these areas, the current second phase of the Task Force direction is to develop zoning which may permanently close vast areas of fishing waters nationwide. This is to be completed by December 9, 2009.
Dave Pfeiffer, President of Shimano American Corporation explained, “In spite of extensive submissions from the recreational fishing community to the Task Force in person and in writing, they failed to include any mention of the over one million jobs or the 6o million anglers which may be affected by the new policies coast to coast. Input from the environmental groups who want to put us off the water was adopted into the report verbatim – the key points we submitted as an industry were ignored.”
Recreational fishing generates a $125 billion annual economy in the United States and supports jobs in every state according to government figures. Through the Sport Fish Restoration program, anglers have provided more than $5 billion through excise taxes on fishing tackle to fishery conservation and education for decades.
In addition to the economic aspects, anglers lead the nation in volunteer conservation efforts on behalf of improving fish habitat, water quality and related environmental areas. “There was no mention of the fishery conservation efforts which anglers have led for over 50 years in every state – an environmental success story that has no equal in the world”, said Phil Morlock, Director, Environmental Affairs for Shimano. “The Task Force did not make any distinction between the dramatic differences between harmful commercial fishing harvest methods and recreational fishing, even though we spelled it out for them in detail,” added Morlock.
Claiming to be the result of a public consultation process the report states, “Having considered a broad range of public comments, this report reflects the requests and concerns of all interested parties.”
The original White House memo and not surprisingly the Task Force report contains multiple references to developing a national policy where Great Lakes and coastal regions are managed, “consistent with international law, including customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea” - a 300-page treaty the U.S. has never ratified.
“We question what implications there will be for state authority and jurisdiction in the Great Lakes and coastal regions if the U.S. adopts the U.N. Treaty,” said Pfeiffer.
The report makes it clear that future authority for implementing the policy for coastal and inland waters will fall under White House jurisdiction with a new National Ocean Council comprised of over 20 federal agencies at Cabinet Secretary or Deputy Secretary level. No reference to Congressional jurisdiction is indicated.
“This significant change in U.S. policy direction is the result of a 90-day fire drill process as ordered by the President that, not surprisingly, lacks balance, clarity and quality in the end product,” said Morlock. “People who simply want to take their kids fishing on public waters deserve better from their government,” he added.
Shimano is joining with other members of the recreational fishing industry to urge anglers to contact their members of Congress and the administration to request this process be required to adopt the economic, conservation and social contributions of recreational fishing as key elements of the policy. It is critical that we ensure Congressional oversight and state jurisdiction and management continues.
E-letters can be sent to the administration and members of Congress by visiting KeepAmericanFishing.org. The future of fishing is in your hands.
###
Editor’s Note: Phil Morlock is attending Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus functions this week in Washington, DC, but will make himself available for questions, interviews on this. Contact John Mazurkiewicz with Catalyst Marketing for arrangements.

Don’t just forward an email, get involved and call your Senator / Congressman and tell them what you think. I have attached their contact info below.

Senators of the 111th Congress

LeMieux, George S. - (R - FL)
Class III
356 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3041
Web Form: lemieux.senate.gov/public/?p=EmailSenatorLeMieux

Nelson, Bill - (D - FL)
Class I
716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5274
Web Form: billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Office of Congressman Alan Grayson
1605 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2176
Fax: (202) 225-0999
https://forms.house.gov/grayson/contact-form.shtml

+1 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from gman3186 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

they could ban fishing across the whole united states and i would be the first person out there fishing they could take me jail im not gonna stop doing what i love

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from matouse3 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Bill, this isn't a case of whether ESPN or F&S got it right. If you do a little reading you will find that ESPN is completely wrong (and admitted it) and everyone else has shown that they were wrong (including F&S)

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from jakenbake wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Completely agree with the last two things Chad says -- no matter who is in power, sportsmen (and sportswomen) need to make sure their voices are heard. If we are silent, there will be nobody to protect our rights.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from texasfirst wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Chad, you can say Montgomery has no reason to cry foul, but as a writer who has covered Gulf coast snapper "conservation" efforts by NOAA and the Pew Environment group, et al, things don't look quite as peachy and safe as you and the NOAA apologists paint them. While the bureaucrats are not going to outlaw recreational fishing outright, consider the real issues here: maritime "sanctuaries" where no fishing at all would be allowed, closed seasons due to "total allowable catch" and so forth, all attributable to VERY POOR SCIENCE and a completely DEAF EAR to the American recreational angler. Some of these groups, like NOAA and Pew, arguably hold anti-angling views. Everything is not peachy, and without trying to "sputter," I nonetheless see the direction in which the current bureaucracy is headed. All I'll say is, don't be complacent, folks.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

And I called my Congressman over this!

YOW!

But at least the word of NO, BUT HELL NO got out if this was real!!

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Think this guys. The government is scared of us. End of story. WE, control THEM. We, are the army. They, just organize it. WE stop fighting for them, they lose. They can only take, which we choose to give them. Catch?

And I quote one of my favorite paragraphs from my recent powerpoint on gun control-

"So let’s make this clear. We are NOT saying you’ll be safer if you have a gun, or that you might not get robbed. We are saying something much heavier. We are saying that we need the government to be afraid of its citizens. We want our rulers to think carefully about what they try to take from us. We need to remember that they can only take from us, what we give to them. You see, maybe Mr. John Doe can call the police against a gang banger, but who does he call against the police? We are discussing the idea of the overthrow of the country, and it’s covered under free speech. Isn’t that cool? We can’t trust the government to always be ok with that. We have to trust, well, the Americans all around us."

Anyone with me? *Holds up fishing rod over his head* "From my cold, dead hands!"

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Pernice th... wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Think this guys. The government is scared of us. End of story. WE, control THEM. We, are the army. They, just organize it. WE stop fighting for them, they lose. They can only take, which we choose to give them. Catch?

And I quote one of my favorite paragraphs from my recent powerpoint on gun control-

"So let’s make this clear. We are NOT saying you’ll be safer if you have a gun, or that you might not get robbed. We are saying something much heavier. We are saying that we need the government to be afraid of its citizens. We want our rulers to think carefully about what they try to take from us. We need to remember that they can only take from us, what we give to them. You see, maybe Mr. John Doe can call the police against a gang banger, but who does he call against the police? We are discussing the idea of the overthrow of the country, and it’s covered under free speech. Isn’t that cool? We can’t trust the government to always be ok with that. We have to trust, well, the Americans all around us."

Anyone with me? *Holds up fishing rod over his head* "From my cold, dead hands!"

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 1Shot2Kills wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

This "wasn't" going to be a complete ban on fishing; instead restrict certain areas to promote fish population growth. Sadly, to many people fish way over their limit and don't get the proper stamps.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Easy enough to believe with the Wackos he's appointed and surrounds himself with. Glad its a farce at least for now.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from matouse3 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Thanks for this article Chad.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from MLH wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I certainly agree with your last paragraph.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Clay Cooper wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

THIS IS A TEST..............

THANK YOU!..................

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from crm3006 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

About time they listened to some segment of the American people.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bella wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

I knew this was ridiculous when I saw it the first time, but people believe what they want to believe, no matter how far fetched. There are elements in this country that will print any libelous notion that blackens the name of people they don't like. And there are other folks who will jump on anything and proclaim it as the wisdom of the heavens, all because it was just what they wanted to hear. How about some common sense people!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill Philips wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

Don't be so quick to dismiss what ESPN has been reporting on this story for months - Robert Montgomery has been documenting this threat in a chain of well documented articles. ESPN did not ever report that all fishing was going to be banned - it was a newspaper headline in Charlotte that sensationalized the story.

The same warnings about the administration direction to implement a zoning strategy that has the potential to close fishing access nationwide have also come from the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, American Sportfishing Assn., Coastal Conservation Assn. , Center for Coastal Conservation, Recreational Fishing Alliance and Shimano. Check it out - Field & Stream didn't bother to do so.

Anglers in California know how real the threat is as one coastal prime fishing area after another is closed permanently to angling in order to 'protect' the habitat.

Field and Stream has been AWOL on the White House Ocean Policy story and now they get the facts wrong and look to criticize ESPN and Montgomery for what should be a wake up call to every angler in America. Check out ESPN Outdoors Saltwater for Robert Montgomery's series of articles that explain what is happening and how this threat is not limited to the oceans or coasts and the Great Lakes are also included.

Then take a look at KeepAmericaFishing.org to see what the recreational fishing industry is asking you to do to help stop this threat to fishing. Then make up your own mind about whether Field and Stream or ESPN got it right.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 2Poppa wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

Updated: March 10, 2010, 3:27 PM ET
Fishing interests rally in Washington

UNITED WE FISH!

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/saltwater/news/story?id=4944255

SHIMANO AMERICAN CORPORATION
News Release

Media contact:
John Mazurkiewicz/Catalyst Marketing – 574/289-1331 – jpmazurk@ameritech.net

For Immediate Release – 10/5/09
FEDS TO 60 MILLION AMERICAN ANGLERS:
WE DON’T NEED YOU

IRVINE, Calif. USA – October 5, 2009 – A recently published administration document outlines a structure that could result in closures of sport fishing in salt and freshwater areas across America. The White House created an Interagency Oceans Policy Task Force in June and gave them only 90 days to develop a comprehensive federal policy for all U.S. coastal, ocean and Great Lakes waters. Under the guise of ‘protecting’ these areas, the current second phase of the Task Force direction is to develop zoning which may permanently close vast areas of fishing waters nationwide. This is to be completed by December 9, 2009.
Dave Pfeiffer, President of Shimano American Corporation explained, “In spite of extensive submissions from the recreational fishing community to the Task Force in person and in writing, they failed to include any mention of the over one million jobs or the 6o million anglers which may be affected by the new policies coast to coast. Input from the environmental groups who want to put us off the water was adopted into the report verbatim – the key points we submitted as an industry were ignored.”
Recreational fishing generates a $125 billion annual economy in the United States and supports jobs in every state according to government figures. Through the Sport Fish Restoration program, anglers have provided more than $5 billion through excise taxes on fishing tackle to fishery conservation and education for decades.
In addition to the economic aspects, anglers lead the nation in volunteer conservation efforts on behalf of improving fish habitat, water quality and related environmental areas. “There was no mention of the fishery conservation efforts which anglers have led for over 50 years in every state – an environmental success story that has no equal in the world”, said Phil Morlock, Director, Environmental Affairs for Shimano. “The Task Force did not make any distinction between the dramatic differences between harmful commercial fishing harvest methods and recreational fishing, even though we spelled it out for them in detail,” added Morlock.
Claiming to be the result of a public consultation process the report states, “Having considered a broad range of public comments, this report reflects the requests and concerns of all interested parties.”
The original White House memo and not surprisingly the Task Force report contains multiple references to developing a national policy where Great Lakes and coastal regions are managed, “consistent with international law, including customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea” - a 300-page treaty the U.S. has never ratified.
“We question what implications there will be for state authority and jurisdiction in the Great Lakes and coastal regions if the U.S. adopts the U.N. Treaty,” said Pfeiffer.
The report makes it clear that future authority for implementing the policy for coastal and inland waters will fall under White House jurisdiction with a new National Ocean Council comprised of over 20 federal agencies at Cabinet Secretary or Deputy Secretary level. No reference to Congressional jurisdiction is indicated.
“This significant change in U.S. policy direction is the result of a 90-day fire drill process as ordered by the President that, not surprisingly, lacks balance, clarity and quality in the end product,” said Morlock. “People who simply want to take their kids fishing on public waters deserve better from their government,” he added.
Shimano is joining with other members of the recreational fishing industry to urge anglers to contact their members of Congress and the administration to request this process be required to adopt the economic, conservation and social contributions of recreational fishing as key elements of the policy. It is critical that we ensure Congressional oversight and state jurisdiction and management continues.
E-letters can be sent to the administration and members of Congress by visiting KeepAmericanFishing.org. The future of fishing is in your hands.
###
Editor’s Note: Phil Morlock is attending Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus functions this week in Washington, DC, but will make himself available for questions, interviews on this. Contact John Mazurkiewicz with Catalyst Marketing for arrangements.

Don’t just forward an email, get involved and call your Senator / Congressman and tell them what you think. I have attached their contact info below.

Senators of the 111th Congress

LeMieux, George S. - (R - FL)
Class III
356 RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-3041
Web Form: lemieux.senate.gov/public/?p=EmailSenatorLeMieux

Nelson, Bill - (D - FL)
Class I
716 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-5274
Web Form: billnelson.senate.gov/contact/index.cfm

Office of Congressman Alan Grayson
1605 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-2176
Fax: (202) 225-0999
https://forms.house.gov/grayson/contact-form.shtml

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from RJ Arena wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

With opinion polls at his lowest since being elected I could not see the President allow such a foolish measure to be considered.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from labrador12 wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

This administration has locked up three to five million barrels of oil a day. Oil that can be used by us, and produced by us. Jobs in production, and materials used in production, and transportation etc. I don't trust these guys with doodlysqat. Salazar has halted any offshore drilling for at least 3 years. Don't get me started on ANWR.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 1 year 46 weeks ago

The thing that was over hyped was the public input misquote. All management plans that have a public comment period will eventually have an end to that comment period. The author made it seem as public comment on everything hence forth was going to be banished.

The rest of it is plenty of reason to worry and keep an eye on the people in charge. The affiliations on people in management positions should always be in question. Rarely is straight science used in making management decisions, different user groups and their lobbyist make sure of that. NOAA has the power to **** you up under any number guises. There are groups out there who want nature to only be something that you look at or think about, not a thing you with which you interact.

So was the title of the article misleading, yes. Should we breath a collective sigh of relief and not pay attention to what these agencies are doing or are capable of, no. This is the age we live in when you have to protect every right you have because some group doesn't think you should have it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bill Philips wrote 1 year 47 weeks ago

So what did you learn when you checked out what all the major rec fishing groups have been saying on this issue, and the call for angler letters to Congress and the Administration on KeepAmericaFishing.org ? These guys are pros at this stuff. F & S is way behind the curve and you are mistaken in your evaluation.

Check out the California MLPA process in S. Cal. Major fishing regions about to be closed forever to anglers.( details also on KeepAmericaFishing.org.) People who fish and hunt need to stick together on these access issues which are spreading quickly inland, and F & S is not being helpful here. They simply did not do sufficient research, and presented only the administration 'damage control' position, which most likely also influenced ESPN / Disney to issue a retreat statement.

People say, "this can't be true". Ask anglers in S. California if it is , and if they ever thought this could happen to them. Same environmental groups pushing for this on a national basis now.

Those who don't learn from history...

-3 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

bmxbiz-fs