Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Big Buck or Big Brother?

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

Whitetail 365
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

April 27, 2009

Big Buck or Big Brother?

By Scott Bestul

Minnesota is one of a growing number of states pondering management strategies that would increase antlerless harvest, as well as the number of mature bucks. While the Gopher State is a long way from implementing any specific regulations, some of the changes under consideration are Antler Point Restrictions (APR’s), moving firearms seasons out of the peak rut, and eliminating cross-tagging of bucks.

These strategies have been successfully implemented in other states. Pennsylvania and Missouri, for example, have used APRs for several seasons and have been successful in protecting a large percentage of yearling bucks. Other states, like Iowa, hold firearms seasons long after the rut is over. Theoretically, this gives the deer a chance to complete the breeding cycle without the interruption of extreme hunting pressure and the obvious removal of a fair percentage of the buck herd. Their late gun season is one of the main reasons Iowa holds the monster bucks it does.

Still, the winds of even possible change are not welcomed by all hunters. Though many whitetail hunters lobby for rules and regs that give bucks at least some protection, others argue strongly for keeping traditional approaches in place. I’ve listened to a lot of Minnesota hunters speak on this subject through the years, and the opinions are all over the map. So I’m interested in a little broader perspective. What are your thoughts? Should state game agencies tweak seasons and regulations to encourage a better age structure among bucks and a more balanced buck/doe ratio? Or should they just hold a deer season and leave such management strategies up to individual hunters?

Comments (28)

Top Rated
All Comments
from jjas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

While I understand the reasoning behind aprs, one buck rules, late (short) gun seasons, etc....I think we are walking down a slippery slope here.

Many people don't bowhunt for various reasons (age, level of strength, time) and most states won't allow Xbows in the general archery season (without a medical reason.

Gun hunters are already being squeezed out of places to hunt due to sprawl, now the dnrs are trying to limit their time in the woods but yet they want them to kill enough does to keep the herd in check.

Why are gun hunters expected to purchase the majority of tags (and thus create the revenue stream), balance the herd by killing does (as bowhunters can't kill enough deer to get it done), yet are expected to sit in inclement weather and not be able to enjoy the season in November and all that brings?

Bottom line, how long should gunhunters be expected to pay the bills, balance the herd and watch trophy bowhunters reap the rewards killing trophy bucks gunhunters helped create during the November rut?

Well?

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

The game agencies that set the rules are essentually game managers. I think we need a good balance of science and biology to manage these herds. Many hunters who shoot spikes, forkies and button bucks are the same ones complaining about a lack of mature bucks. I think APR's have had a great effect on the quality and age of bucks in PA. Killing lots of does has balanced the herd too. Yes, many are angry because they see fewer deer and/or have to let a nice Forkhorn walk, but many are seeing and killing much nicer mature bucks. It's a trade-off. Not everyone will be happy, but I personally am for these restrictions.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Here in Ark. we've had a three pt. rule for over 5ys. now and I for one have'nt noticed any "bigger "deer". If your under sixteen yrs old you can still shoot "any" buck that walks by(first deer). I understand this helps get/keep youngesters in the game but those deer don't have a chance to grow. I can understand what they are trying to do but like jjas said, why sahould guys that are "paying" more,get "less" from the process. They should try to that into consideration when setting dates/and regs. thats my opionion though.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Not that I don't enjoy seeing or being able to take a big buck but rules like these I think can be detrimental to hunting as a whole. If you watching hunting TV and read the magazines you would assume everyone should have a food plot, can pay huge out of state fees, and routinely kills record book deer. The reality is most of us don't do these things. We just hunt because we love it. Making rules to grow bigger bucks just seems like anti-hunting ammo. Isn't hunting supposed to be about fellowship with friend and family, taking part in nature, and population control?
Hell the whole earn a buck program had to come about because we are bombarded with this "kill a buck or lose you manhood" mentality. It just my opinion but the whole QDMA system is not doing anything to recruit new people to the deer hunting. If anything it has cause people to be extremely guarded about their land and is probably directly responsible for the most horrible and access limiting thing in hunting the "hunting lease".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

I think the management strategies should be left to individual hunters and property hunters. If they want to take a early buck, even though not wise to do so, let them. It is their land and they will suffer the consequences of their actions and what their buck management plan is. I would imagine that it might be a little hard to hunt past the rut, it would depend on focusing on a deers habits and ambushing them or catching them at a feeding spot. It would be quite hard to lure a deer in at this time. Besides, after the rut, bucks are dead tired...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

While having bigger bucks to hunt would be a great thing, I would miss the traditional hunting during the rut, since calling and rattling whitetail is one of my favorite hunting pursuits.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Sounds like big buck quality deer bubba managment. Your average deer hunter doesn't want QDM shoved down their throats. The average deer hunter is very happy with harvesting a 4 or 5 point and a doe so they can put venison in the freezer for their family. Deer herds were just fine with a 2 buck limit with one tag being for a small buck and one for a buck with 4 points or more on one antler. Leave the QDM to the high fence operations.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Since 1979 except for time in far parts of the world I have hunted Macon CO Missouri. Before they got the 4 point antler restrictions and unlimited antlerless tags for $7.00 each we would see 20-30 deer opening weekend. Usually it would breakdown to something like 15 doe, 3 or 4 small bucks and 1 or 2 mature bucks. With a trip to the "Special D" meatlocker in Macon one could see lots of young bucks and not many bucks over 1.5 years old. It took about 3 years for the change to really become apparent. Now we see about 20-30 deer but it's 50-50 bucks to doe. Last fall on opening day three guys saw 6 shooter bucks. There is a photo of 2 nice bucks on page 7 of my photofile. To view just click my username then click on photos at bottom right of page. We also took several doe for extra meat.
In my home state of Kansas I have lobbied for point restrictions for several years to no avail. jjas is right. The late gun season in Kansas with it's really poor weather has me giving my best shot to the early ML and archery seasons.
A few years ago I bumped into a Kansas ML hunter dragging out a small 5 pt buck. He passed on 5 doe and shot the little buck. This thing about meat hunters shooting small bucks just dosn't wash with me. And how many of those little guys do you think are ever mounted. Folks just want to be able to say "I got a buck". IMO if you want meat shoot a doe. They eat better anyhow.
Oh, and now with a trip to Special D meats you actually can see dozens of wall hangars anybody would be proud of.
If you are looking for a very good chance at a big one Feild and Stream got it right when the picked Kirksville as a top destination. It's only 11 miles up the road from the farm we hunt. There is plenty of public land too.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

I hunt in MN and would love to see APR's for 16 and over. I don't think that means gun hunters are subsidizing archery trophy hunts. (I hunt all three seasons, archery, muzzleloader and rifle so I'm guessing I do my part for the revenue stream.) I think it will make hunting better for all the hunters during all the seasons. Better in that they are hunting a healthier deer herd with a balanced ratio. Certainly much of the anecdotal evidence you hear on this site from people in PA and other states indicates it is true
It is clear from the many conversations I have had with people who have hunted here their whole lives that there is greater emphasis placed on shooting a buck over a doe no matter what the size. For no apparent reason. A lot of people call me "doe killer" because I shoot every doe that I can legally kill until my freezer is full.
While the regs are easy to categorize as QDMA I think they are more intended to restore a healthy buck/doe ratio with the added benefit of allowing young bucks to mature and grow larger antlers. As for people self regulating, that might happen, given a lot of education to the young hunters coming up through hunter safety. Otherwise my sense is that with most of the folks I know, "a change is bad" mentality permeates almost everything they do. Without any outside compulsion, they will continue the status quo and shoot the spikers just to say they shot a buck.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edstoresit wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

In Ark. The 3 pt restriction has done and will do very little to protect any age class. Most 1 to 1.5 years olds will never have more than a 6 pt. main frame. By restricting harvest on any deer with 3pt or less per side, there is no age class rectriction. Those yearlings that have less then this # are more than likely late born fawns that were not at the maximum body mass index and therefore had to put nutrition toward weight gain rather than antler development.
Does antler harvest restriction work? Absolutely, but you have to maintain a healthy antlerless harvets to keep up with recruitment. Our farm of 1200 acres in central Ky., has been in a "Qdm" program for 8 years and we continually see older aged bucks that are "shooters". Since the balanced structure of the heard allows for more "shooter" sightings, the attitude in our camp has shifted to allow most of our 3.5-4.5 year olds to walk. We have on trail cameras seen the "Booners" that we have on the property and it's alot harder to pull the trigger on a main frame 3.5 y/o 8 pt., when you know that right behind him could be the 7+ y/o 16 pointer w/ double drop tines.
Now don't get me wrong, in order to get to where we are it has taken alot of work, time and money. We manage 70 acres+/- of food plots and set a harvest goal for does every year based on a pre- and post season camera survye, We usually take between 30-45 does per year to maintain as close to an even ratio between sexes as we can. We take rumen samples to make sure what we are planting is eaten, and extract jaw bones of every animal harvested for aging. It is work and it is time consuming, but the rewards are great, and let's be honest, when is "working" at the farm truly like work?

It does work, patience is key.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Hromas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Next to safety, the thing I look for in my handloads is consistency! This all starts with case preparation, and is where I spend most of my time in the reloading process. I begin by selecting and weight-sorting all my brass. All brass are not equal, which means that I try to keep all my brass from the same manufacturer and production lot grouped together. I have found that identical loads in Winchester brass shoots differently than the same loads in Remington and/or Federal brass, so keeping them separate and grouped together will yield more consistency from one shot to the next. Once this is done, I will clean, resize and trim the cases to the proper length. For brass that I’ll be loading for the first time, I will also ream out the primer pockets and deburr the flash holes. (Remember, this is all being done for consistency.) After I’m finished with all of the case preparation, I can then start seating new primers, weighing the powder charges and seating the bullets for each cartridge. (Again, I’m doing everything for consistency.) Determining the desired powder charge for each of the different bullets you might load and the cartridge-overall-length (the bullet seating depth) is the part you’ll learn from spending time at the rifle range. When testing your loads, I would recommend that you invest in and use a chronograph. This will help eliminate the guess work, and will save you a lot of time and money in the long run. The results of all this consistency is going to help you achieve the accuracy you’re ultimately looking for in your handloads, which is why most of us reload our own cartridges to begin with.
I have reloaded all of my ammo since 1972, when I purchased my Remington model 700, 30-06. I have never shot a factory load through this rifle, and I’m proud to say that it has never failed to fill a deer permit. So, to sum things up, just remember that consistency is how you achieve accuracy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from buck hunter 17 wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

i think that they should hold the deer season opener a week later and they should leave such management strategies up to individual hunter.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Hromas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Sorry! My previous post was in the wrong blog.

I agree with buck hunter 17. Leave the deer season alone. Why fix something that isn't broken?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from 19 point buck wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

why is shooting a huge buck so important. a 6 point buck i shot when my dad was making a drive to me was as much a "trophy" as the 19 point buck i shot in canada. qdm puts too much emphasis on size of the rack, instead of the quality of the hunt. we should be concentrating on getting new hunters, not on how people can shoot bigger deer.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shedmagnet wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

2% of land in Iowa is public. In Minnesota that number is nearly 30%. This fact alone justifies at least some experimentation with APR. Sidenote: If you work your whole life and scrimp and save to finally buy your 80-acre dream hunting property and you pay $3500 per month for a mortgage AND you pay $5000 in annual real estate taxes plus liability insurance, etc. AND you spend $5000 per year on food plots and tree plantings and ponds; why in the name of Jesus would you then open it up to John Q Public to come and enjoy the fruits of your labor? At the very least you would lease it out and try to re-coup some of your investments (if you were strapped for cash). Why is a hunting lease such an evil thing? What is wrong with charging a fee for the priviledge to hunt some well-managed ground? Why do folks still expect a free lunch when it comes to a good hunting spot?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

a responce to the guy at top of the page..for starters 95 percent of the gun hunters dont put the time in like a bow hunter ,and i mean by setting in a tree stand day after day,,if they did they would have more bigger bucks,,when they got a gun in there hand they take the easy route and set where they can see for ever instead of in a bunch of thick woods where they can only see 20 yards,i see it here every gun season when ,all you see is blaze orange walking in every direction scaring every thing in sight and dont care what way the wind is blowing,that is a proven fact here, here you see deer all the time till the first day of gun season opens and every gun hunter in the woods shows up and dont care how much noise they make walking and breaking branches ,or what way the wind is blowing,,a true bow hunter that is dedicated to bowhunting dont do that they try to hide there sent,and try to sneak in the woods and not move till they leave,and when they leave there stand they sneak out, they dont stand and holler at a buddy a hundred yards away to see what he seen,if ya dont belive me show up in lyman county south dakota the first day of gun season and see what they are doing here ,most of them are driving up and down the roads in the dark back and forth before it ever gets light out scaring every thing away in the dark

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

one more thing ive seen more and bigger bucks in december after the gun season has closed and all the gun hunters are setting home watching football drinking beer,to bad they dont pick up all them beer cans in the woods they throw down while there gun hunting and take them home with them

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Gee Dave,

Don't hold back, tell me how you really feel, lol....

Not all gunhunters are slob hunters. Not all gun hunters take the easy way out.

And while you paint a zen like picture of bowhunting, let's get a bit real here. Using scent lok suits, laser rangefinders, 80% let off bows, fiber optic pins and mechanical releases (that the majority of bowhunters use today) isn't really the epitamy of "traditional bowhunting" is it. And modern inline muzzleloaders with scopes (and 200 yard capability) don't really fit the term "primitive weapon" do they?

And while you complain about gun hunters, don't forget that without them paying the bills and killing the does necessary to help both balance and keep the herd in check, trophy bowhunting for whitetails wouldn't be what it is today. Not even close.....

BTW, I hunt with both a bow and a gun(s) and have killed bucks (and does) with both and have done so for over 30 years, and have never once drank beer while hunting, but thanks for the opinion.

Jim

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

lol well since ya brought up bows,want my real opinon on bows,ive been bowhuntng for 40 years with a real bow,a recurve and like ya say about the compunds as i call them gun bows with all there sights and triggers and now barrles that they made,as far as iam comcearned they can take the compounds and put them in with the gun season,because thats all they are any how is a gun thats why ya see all these guys on tv shooting deer 50 yards away every shot and hitting right where they want to in the ribs just like shooting a gun with a scope ,put that sight right where ya want it and pull the trigger they all use,, and stand there with it drawed back for a hour at a time that aint bowhunting,i aint seen a compound yet that bows when ya pull it back,like ive said before ,wheres the pedals at its got wheels on it

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

and i said 95 percent not every body

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

and i buy two or three bow lisences for does every year two ,not just a buck tag so i can shoot some does

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Dave,

I can appreciate the candor and like you I purchase multiple tags every season too(at least one for bow, gun and muzzleloader).

Best of luck this season.

Jim

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

I', 73+ ys young and hunted since I was l0 yrs old on our farm in NC. I had my first deerhunt in anothe part of the state as we had no Deer where I lived. I fell head over heels in love with Deer hunting. I've hunted many States including 5 of the Rocky Mtn States and have yet to see a DOE in a Truck. All want a Trophy Buck. Her at home we have about l50 Acres we handle proper by seeding, fertilizer, weed keller and we harvest the sub-prim ( gene lacking) small body thin horn bucks. We began taking the poor gene bucks about 5 yrs ago and now we have nice 4-6 yr old bucks with nice racks. LAst yr My Son and I killed 2 8's and a 9, all three older deer. I also hunted Montana and saw the results of KILL ANY BUCK AS YOU PAID 5K for a hunt. Now the Ranch I hunted is lacking Deer period, especially nice Bucks. I did harvest a Mulie, but was a Gene poor Buck that needed taking out. In general all game there was about 505 of what I saw 5 yrs ag on same ranch. Non-property hunters think any land they hunt is theirs and will invade said prperty when you ae away. Posting is useless and these Pachers ride the roads at night and kill the EYES they see. Game Wardens are few and far between. A few of us land owners have taken it upon ourselves to monitor this pratice and a shot or two over their heads does help for a few dys, then same old stuff. N>C> wher I live has extended its Deer season begining first week of Nov. to Jan. lst.I'm thinking it will make matters worse, but if I got a rifle for Christmas i would love to give it a try out before the next yrs season.License fees out West are out of the average guys raange and the locals think all land is theirs and they pay about 10% of what I pay for tags. They (the states) do not realize the $$ we NR spend other than for tags. I do feel that the Rocky Mtn States should have a weeks season during the Rut for Elk, as l85 is not good odds for the cost involved. I hate Fenced Hunts, but unless some change made out West, soon that is all you can hunt. Plus most locals in the Rockies HATE us NR hunters and will strive to send you to a aea with no game period. Thankful I have 2 connections, one in C0 and one in MT that allows me to hunt for a reasonable fee and they issue only a given # of tresspass permits. Yes, Does are good eating and I eat what I kill. Once my freezer is full I yet go hunting, but mostly to enjoy the outdoors and try to kill Foxes and Yotes. As the old saying goes, the worst day afield is better than the best day at work. I hunt from a ground Blind and with a Buddy heater and stay warm and enjoy the outdoors. It's like going to a restriced park to see the different game. When you guys reach my age, the # of points is not my goal, my goal is to be able to get out and try my newer guns if the Trophy does come my way. Back to the Rockies, once you hear or see a 6 x 6 bugle, you are ruined for life. By all means go while young enough to walk the Mtns and see Gods wonders. Shoot-um-straight and often. A gun that shoots whee you aim is all you need providing its ample gun to take the larger game with one well placed shot. And yes, at l28 lbs and 5'8" a 06 with l80 gr Scirocco bullets will kill anything I hunt in NA.I suggest your first biggame hunt to the West be a Antelope hunt. Is a great first big game hunt for most of us. Ok enough mouthing, take care. Have a good season and pratice till your gun is an extension of your frearm.Lastly, Bow hunters do have the first opportunity at the trophy game each fall, especially the Rut on Elk. If you plan to hunt Mulies, Elk try Montana as they have a 5 week season or till you fill your tag, plus small game, .birds and fishing if you buy the Combo license@$658.00 Lastly the Lawn Mower Muffler does work@ less than a cost of $25.00. Even on larger calibers other than the 22 mags.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Devil_Dog wrote 2 years 39 weeks ago

Wildlife management should be based on current science. If hunters want to survive as legitimate conservation-oriented group, we need to be a tool for responsible and scientific wildlife management. To that end balancing sex ratios and population density is key.

If doing so requires we see and harvest fewer deer, so be it. If it means protecting the young, dumb bucks from getting shot, so be it.

It's not about antlers, that's more of a second order effect. It's also not about being able to shoot a deer every time you go out. It's about doing what's best for the environment and the species.

If earn-a-buck supports those endstates, I'm all for it. If not, then a better system is needed.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from renegades wrote 2 years 39 weeks ago

that is a big buck. Where did you get this deer at.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from georgeIII wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

oh my god just sacrifice a little for a lot. if we move the season more people all over the state will have an opportunity to harvest a deer. we all no that shooting doe's is the only way to manage the population, and they can be hard to come by during the rut because of the pressure the bucks put on them. so if it is moved, that would provide more bucks an opportunity to survive (increasing the quality) the year and increase the chance of the so called meat hunters a better shot at filling the freezer with tasty doe meet instead of a stinky 2.5 year old buck that all minnesotans already have a box in there garage filled with racks that nothing will ever hapen too its a discrase. IF YOUR NOT GOING TO MOUNT IT SHOOT A DAMN DOE THEY TASTE MUTCH BETTER.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

It is interesting to read the posts from you whitetail hunters back east... You live in a target rich environment with many more opportunities to take game than hunters in my state do!

Here in Washington State, we have no fewer than 135 Game Management Units. The boundaries of the units must be clearly understood as the regulations for each unit are different. Only 8 of those Game Management Units are "any deer" units. The rest are "Any Buck; "2 point minimum" or "3 point minimum". That would be the western "one side" method of counting points. Any place that the reg's are "any deer" -- there is a really good chance that you won't see "any deer". Even if you get a doe tag for a buck only unit, through the special lottery system, it will be in a unit where taking even a doe is really difficult.

In our state, you cannot hunt different methods and different seasons. If you choose archery, you only get to hunt that season and that method; same with muzzle loading season and modern firearm.

On the western side of the state, where I hunt, the terrain is remarkably rugged, the brush nearly impenetrable and the black tail deer are wary and live deep in the darkest reaches of the forest.

It isn't any wonder that hunter success rates in Washington hover around 25%. And that would be only one deer allowed, per season, per hunter.

In my 7 years of hunting, there has only been one year when I was not one of the 75 out of a 100 that walked out of the woods empty handed. It was a glorious day and the 2&1/2 year old, 3 point buck was one of the hardest earned trophies (not just hunting) of my life.

It seems good that I have had to learn to hunt under these conditions -- if I'd learned how to hunt where the only complaint is that people take spike bucks when they should have and could have taken does, I'd have been finished after the first season out here.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Boar Slayer wrote 1 year 44 weeks ago

I have been a resident of Pennsylvania for 30 years and a hunter for 42 years. I learned to hunt from an old man who hunted for food and he taught me to be a "meat hunter". I passed this on to my sons. With the complex APR system in place, I have done what many others in my state have done. I stopped deer hunting. My youngest son still sits and stalks, but has not shot a deer since the new regs were instituted. For me, the real reason we hunt has been lost in the never ending need for "trophies". The DNR in PA has effectively shut many of us out of the field and there really is no use to complain. We are told that this is for our own good, they are smarter than us and we probably are not very good hunters anyway. Couple this with the way the rifle season is scheduled and it is easy to see why there are fewer hunters in the field. Pa begins its' deer season the Monday after Thanksgiving.What this means is that deer season has only one Saturday. Since Sunday hunting is illeagl, working people get one day to deer hunt, unless they save vacation days for this purpose.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from jjas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

While I understand the reasoning behind aprs, one buck rules, late (short) gun seasons, etc....I think we are walking down a slippery slope here.

Many people don't bowhunt for various reasons (age, level of strength, time) and most states won't allow Xbows in the general archery season (without a medical reason.

Gun hunters are already being squeezed out of places to hunt due to sprawl, now the dnrs are trying to limit their time in the woods but yet they want them to kill enough does to keep the herd in check.

Why are gun hunters expected to purchase the majority of tags (and thus create the revenue stream), balance the herd by killing does (as bowhunters can't kill enough deer to get it done), yet are expected to sit in inclement weather and not be able to enjoy the season in November and all that brings?

Bottom line, how long should gunhunters be expected to pay the bills, balance the herd and watch trophy bowhunters reap the rewards killing trophy bucks gunhunters helped create during the November rut?

Well?

+6 Good Comment? | | Report
from steve182 wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

The game agencies that set the rules are essentually game managers. I think we need a good balance of science and biology to manage these herds. Many hunters who shoot spikes, forkies and button bucks are the same ones complaining about a lack of mature bucks. I think APR's have had a great effect on the quality and age of bucks in PA. Killing lots of does has balanced the herd too. Yes, many are angry because they see fewer deer and/or have to let a nice Forkhorn walk, but many are seeing and killing much nicer mature bucks. It's a trade-off. Not everyone will be happy, but I personally am for these restrictions.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Del in KS wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Since 1979 except for time in far parts of the world I have hunted Macon CO Missouri. Before they got the 4 point antler restrictions and unlimited antlerless tags for $7.00 each we would see 20-30 deer opening weekend. Usually it would breakdown to something like 15 doe, 3 or 4 small bucks and 1 or 2 mature bucks. With a trip to the "Special D" meatlocker in Macon one could see lots of young bucks and not many bucks over 1.5 years old. It took about 3 years for the change to really become apparent. Now we see about 20-30 deer but it's 50-50 bucks to doe. Last fall on opening day three guys saw 6 shooter bucks. There is a photo of 2 nice bucks on page 7 of my photofile. To view just click my username then click on photos at bottom right of page. We also took several doe for extra meat.
In my home state of Kansas I have lobbied for point restrictions for several years to no avail. jjas is right. The late gun season in Kansas with it's really poor weather has me giving my best shot to the early ML and archery seasons.
A few years ago I bumped into a Kansas ML hunter dragging out a small 5 pt buck. He passed on 5 doe and shot the little buck. This thing about meat hunters shooting small bucks just dosn't wash with me. And how many of those little guys do you think are ever mounted. Folks just want to be able to say "I got a buck". IMO if you want meat shoot a doe. They eat better anyhow.
Oh, and now with a trip to Special D meats you actually can see dozens of wall hangars anybody would be proud of.
If you are looking for a very good chance at a big one Feild and Stream got it right when the picked Kirksville as a top destination. It's only 11 miles up the road from the farm we hunt. There is plenty of public land too.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Edstoresit wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

In Ark. The 3 pt restriction has done and will do very little to protect any age class. Most 1 to 1.5 years olds will never have more than a 6 pt. main frame. By restricting harvest on any deer with 3pt or less per side, there is no age class rectriction. Those yearlings that have less then this # are more than likely late born fawns that were not at the maximum body mass index and therefore had to put nutrition toward weight gain rather than antler development.
Does antler harvest restriction work? Absolutely, but you have to maintain a healthy antlerless harvets to keep up with recruitment. Our farm of 1200 acres in central Ky., has been in a "Qdm" program for 8 years and we continually see older aged bucks that are "shooters". Since the balanced structure of the heard allows for more "shooter" sightings, the attitude in our camp has shifted to allow most of our 3.5-4.5 year olds to walk. We have on trail cameras seen the "Booners" that we have on the property and it's alot harder to pull the trigger on a main frame 3.5 y/o 8 pt., when you know that right behind him could be the 7+ y/o 16 pointer w/ double drop tines.
Now don't get me wrong, in order to get to where we are it has taken alot of work, time and money. We manage 70 acres+/- of food plots and set a harvest goal for does every year based on a pre- and post season camera survye, We usually take between 30-45 does per year to maintain as close to an even ratio between sexes as we can. We take rumen samples to make sure what we are planting is eaten, and extract jaw bones of every animal harvested for aging. It is work and it is time consuming, but the rewards are great, and let's be honest, when is "working" at the farm truly like work?

It does work, patience is key.

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Big O wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Here in Ark. we've had a three pt. rule for over 5ys. now and I for one have'nt noticed any "bigger "deer". If your under sixteen yrs old you can still shoot "any" buck that walks by(first deer). I understand this helps get/keep youngesters in the game but those deer don't have a chance to grow. I can understand what they are trying to do but like jjas said, why sahould guys that are "paying" more,get "less" from the process. They should try to that into consideration when setting dates/and regs. thats my opionion though.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from FloridaHunter1226 wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

I think the management strategies should be left to individual hunters and property hunters. If they want to take a early buck, even though not wise to do so, let them. It is their land and they will suffer the consequences of their actions and what their buck management plan is. I would imagine that it might be a little hard to hunt past the rut, it would depend on focusing on a deers habits and ambushing them or catching them at a feeding spot. It would be quite hard to lure a deer in at this time. Besides, after the rut, bucks are dead tired...

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from idahooutdoors wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

While having bigger bucks to hunt would be a great thing, I would miss the traditional hunting during the rut, since calling and rattling whitetail is one of my favorite hunting pursuits.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Walt Smith wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Sounds like big buck quality deer bubba managment. Your average deer hunter doesn't want QDM shoved down their throats. The average deer hunter is very happy with harvesting a 4 or 5 point and a doe so they can put venison in the freezer for their family. Deer herds were just fine with a 2 buck limit with one tag being for a small buck and one for a buck with 4 points or more on one antler. Leave the QDM to the high fence operations.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from chuckles wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

I hunt in MN and would love to see APR's for 16 and over. I don't think that means gun hunters are subsidizing archery trophy hunts. (I hunt all three seasons, archery, muzzleloader and rifle so I'm guessing I do my part for the revenue stream.) I think it will make hunting better for all the hunters during all the seasons. Better in that they are hunting a healthier deer herd with a balanced ratio. Certainly much of the anecdotal evidence you hear on this site from people in PA and other states indicates it is true
It is clear from the many conversations I have had with people who have hunted here their whole lives that there is greater emphasis placed on shooting a buck over a doe no matter what the size. For no apparent reason. A lot of people call me "doe killer" because I shoot every doe that I can legally kill until my freezer is full.
While the regs are easy to categorize as QDMA I think they are more intended to restore a healthy buck/doe ratio with the added benefit of allowing young bucks to mature and grow larger antlers. As for people self regulating, that might happen, given a lot of education to the young hunters coming up through hunter safety. Otherwise my sense is that with most of the folks I know, "a change is bad" mentality permeates almost everything they do. Without any outside compulsion, they will continue the status quo and shoot the spikers just to say they shot a buck.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Hromas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Next to safety, the thing I look for in my handloads is consistency! This all starts with case preparation, and is where I spend most of my time in the reloading process. I begin by selecting and weight-sorting all my brass. All brass are not equal, which means that I try to keep all my brass from the same manufacturer and production lot grouped together. I have found that identical loads in Winchester brass shoots differently than the same loads in Remington and/or Federal brass, so keeping them separate and grouped together will yield more consistency from one shot to the next. Once this is done, I will clean, resize and trim the cases to the proper length. For brass that I’ll be loading for the first time, I will also ream out the primer pockets and deburr the flash holes. (Remember, this is all being done for consistency.) After I’m finished with all of the case preparation, I can then start seating new primers, weighing the powder charges and seating the bullets for each cartridge. (Again, I’m doing everything for consistency.) Determining the desired powder charge for each of the different bullets you might load and the cartridge-overall-length (the bullet seating depth) is the part you’ll learn from spending time at the rifle range. When testing your loads, I would recommend that you invest in and use a chronograph. This will help eliminate the guess work, and will save you a lot of time and money in the long run. The results of all this consistency is going to help you achieve the accuracy you’re ultimately looking for in your handloads, which is why most of us reload our own cartridges to begin with.
I have reloaded all of my ammo since 1972, when I purchased my Remington model 700, 30-06. I have never shot a factory load through this rifle, and I’m proud to say that it has never failed to fill a deer permit. So, to sum things up, just remember that consistency is how you achieve accuracy.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from 19 point buck wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

why is shooting a huge buck so important. a 6 point buck i shot when my dad was making a drive to me was as much a "trophy" as the 19 point buck i shot in canada. qdm puts too much emphasis on size of the rack, instead of the quality of the hunt. we should be concentrating on getting new hunters, not on how people can shoot bigger deer.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from shedmagnet wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

2% of land in Iowa is public. In Minnesota that number is nearly 30%. This fact alone justifies at least some experimentation with APR. Sidenote: If you work your whole life and scrimp and save to finally buy your 80-acre dream hunting property and you pay $3500 per month for a mortgage AND you pay $5000 in annual real estate taxes plus liability insurance, etc. AND you spend $5000 per year on food plots and tree plantings and ponds; why in the name of Jesus would you then open it up to John Q Public to come and enjoy the fruits of your labor? At the very least you would lease it out and try to re-coup some of your investments (if you were strapped for cash). Why is a hunting lease such an evil thing? What is wrong with charging a fee for the priviledge to hunt some well-managed ground? Why do folks still expect a free lunch when it comes to a good hunting spot?

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

a responce to the guy at top of the page..for starters 95 percent of the gun hunters dont put the time in like a bow hunter ,and i mean by setting in a tree stand day after day,,if they did they would have more bigger bucks,,when they got a gun in there hand they take the easy route and set where they can see for ever instead of in a bunch of thick woods where they can only see 20 yards,i see it here every gun season when ,all you see is blaze orange walking in every direction scaring every thing in sight and dont care what way the wind is blowing,that is a proven fact here, here you see deer all the time till the first day of gun season opens and every gun hunter in the woods shows up and dont care how much noise they make walking and breaking branches ,or what way the wind is blowing,,a true bow hunter that is dedicated to bowhunting dont do that they try to hide there sent,and try to sneak in the woods and not move till they leave,and when they leave there stand they sneak out, they dont stand and holler at a buddy a hundred yards away to see what he seen,if ya dont belive me show up in lyman county south dakota the first day of gun season and see what they are doing here ,most of them are driving up and down the roads in the dark back and forth before it ever gets light out scaring every thing away in the dark

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Gee Dave,

Don't hold back, tell me how you really feel, lol....

Not all gunhunters are slob hunters. Not all gun hunters take the easy way out.

And while you paint a zen like picture of bowhunting, let's get a bit real here. Using scent lok suits, laser rangefinders, 80% let off bows, fiber optic pins and mechanical releases (that the majority of bowhunters use today) isn't really the epitamy of "traditional bowhunting" is it. And modern inline muzzleloaders with scopes (and 200 yard capability) don't really fit the term "primitive weapon" do they?

And while you complain about gun hunters, don't forget that without them paying the bills and killing the does necessary to help both balance and keep the herd in check, trophy bowhunting for whitetails wouldn't be what it is today. Not even close.....

BTW, I hunt with both a bow and a gun(s) and have killed bucks (and does) with both and have done so for over 30 years, and have never once drank beer while hunting, but thanks for the opinion.

Jim

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Gunslinger wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

I', 73+ ys young and hunted since I was l0 yrs old on our farm in NC. I had my first deerhunt in anothe part of the state as we had no Deer where I lived. I fell head over heels in love with Deer hunting. I've hunted many States including 5 of the Rocky Mtn States and have yet to see a DOE in a Truck. All want a Trophy Buck. Her at home we have about l50 Acres we handle proper by seeding, fertilizer, weed keller and we harvest the sub-prim ( gene lacking) small body thin horn bucks. We began taking the poor gene bucks about 5 yrs ago and now we have nice 4-6 yr old bucks with nice racks. LAst yr My Son and I killed 2 8's and a 9, all three older deer. I also hunted Montana and saw the results of KILL ANY BUCK AS YOU PAID 5K for a hunt. Now the Ranch I hunted is lacking Deer period, especially nice Bucks. I did harvest a Mulie, but was a Gene poor Buck that needed taking out. In general all game there was about 505 of what I saw 5 yrs ag on same ranch. Non-property hunters think any land they hunt is theirs and will invade said prperty when you ae away. Posting is useless and these Pachers ride the roads at night and kill the EYES they see. Game Wardens are few and far between. A few of us land owners have taken it upon ourselves to monitor this pratice and a shot or two over their heads does help for a few dys, then same old stuff. N>C> wher I live has extended its Deer season begining first week of Nov. to Jan. lst.I'm thinking it will make matters worse, but if I got a rifle for Christmas i would love to give it a try out before the next yrs season.License fees out West are out of the average guys raange and the locals think all land is theirs and they pay about 10% of what I pay for tags. They (the states) do not realize the $$ we NR spend other than for tags. I do feel that the Rocky Mtn States should have a weeks season during the Rut for Elk, as l85 is not good odds for the cost involved. I hate Fenced Hunts, but unless some change made out West, soon that is all you can hunt. Plus most locals in the Rockies HATE us NR hunters and will strive to send you to a aea with no game period. Thankful I have 2 connections, one in C0 and one in MT that allows me to hunt for a reasonable fee and they issue only a given # of tresspass permits. Yes, Does are good eating and I eat what I kill. Once my freezer is full I yet go hunting, but mostly to enjoy the outdoors and try to kill Foxes and Yotes. As the old saying goes, the worst day afield is better than the best day at work. I hunt from a ground Blind and with a Buddy heater and stay warm and enjoy the outdoors. It's like going to a restriced park to see the different game. When you guys reach my age, the # of points is not my goal, my goal is to be able to get out and try my newer guns if the Trophy does come my way. Back to the Rockies, once you hear or see a 6 x 6 bugle, you are ruined for life. By all means go while young enough to walk the Mtns and see Gods wonders. Shoot-um-straight and often. A gun that shoots whee you aim is all you need providing its ample gun to take the larger game with one well placed shot. And yes, at l28 lbs and 5'8" a 06 with l80 gr Scirocco bullets will kill anything I hunt in NA.I suggest your first biggame hunt to the West be a Antelope hunt. Is a great first big game hunt for most of us. Ok enough mouthing, take care. Have a good season and pratice till your gun is an extension of your frearm.Lastly, Bow hunters do have the first opportunity at the trophy game each fall, especially the Rut on Elk. If you plan to hunt Mulies, Elk try Montana as they have a 5 week season or till you fill your tag, plus small game, .birds and fishing if you buy the Combo license@$658.00 Lastly the Lawn Mower Muffler does work@ less than a cost of $25.00. Even on larger calibers other than the 22 mags.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from renegades wrote 2 years 39 weeks ago

that is a big buck. Where did you get this deer at.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Not that I don't enjoy seeing or being able to take a big buck but rules like these I think can be detrimental to hunting as a whole. If you watching hunting TV and read the magazines you would assume everyone should have a food plot, can pay huge out of state fees, and routinely kills record book deer. The reality is most of us don't do these things. We just hunt because we love it. Making rules to grow bigger bucks just seems like anti-hunting ammo. Isn't hunting supposed to be about fellowship with friend and family, taking part in nature, and population control?
Hell the whole earn a buck program had to come about because we are bombarded with this "kill a buck or lose you manhood" mentality. It just my opinion but the whole QDMA system is not doing anything to recruit new people to the deer hunting. If anything it has cause people to be extremely guarded about their land and is probably directly responsible for the most horrible and access limiting thing in hunting the "hunting lease".

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buck hunter 17 wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

i think that they should hold the deer season opener a week later and they should leave such management strategies up to individual hunter.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Hromas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Sorry! My previous post was in the wrong blog.

I agree with buck hunter 17. Leave the deer season alone. Why fix something that isn't broken?

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

one more thing ive seen more and bigger bucks in december after the gun season has closed and all the gun hunters are setting home watching football drinking beer,to bad they dont pick up all them beer cans in the woods they throw down while there gun hunting and take them home with them

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

and i said 95 percent not every body

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

and i buy two or three bow lisences for does every year two ,not just a buck tag so i can shoot some does

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jjas wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

Dave,

I can appreciate the candor and like you I purchase multiple tags every season too(at least one for bow, gun and muzzleloader).

Best of luck this season.

Jim

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Devil_Dog wrote 2 years 39 weeks ago

Wildlife management should be based on current science. If hunters want to survive as legitimate conservation-oriented group, we need to be a tool for responsible and scientific wildlife management. To that end balancing sex ratios and population density is key.

If doing so requires we see and harvest fewer deer, so be it. If it means protecting the young, dumb bucks from getting shot, so be it.

It's not about antlers, that's more of a second order effect. It's also not about being able to shoot a deer every time you go out. It's about doing what's best for the environment and the species.

If earn-a-buck supports those endstates, I'm all for it. If not, then a better system is needed.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Carney wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

It is interesting to read the posts from you whitetail hunters back east... You live in a target rich environment with many more opportunities to take game than hunters in my state do!

Here in Washington State, we have no fewer than 135 Game Management Units. The boundaries of the units must be clearly understood as the regulations for each unit are different. Only 8 of those Game Management Units are "any deer" units. The rest are "Any Buck; "2 point minimum" or "3 point minimum". That would be the western "one side" method of counting points. Any place that the reg's are "any deer" -- there is a really good chance that you won't see "any deer". Even if you get a doe tag for a buck only unit, through the special lottery system, it will be in a unit where taking even a doe is really difficult.

In our state, you cannot hunt different methods and different seasons. If you choose archery, you only get to hunt that season and that method; same with muzzle loading season and modern firearm.

On the western side of the state, where I hunt, the terrain is remarkably rugged, the brush nearly impenetrable and the black tail deer are wary and live deep in the darkest reaches of the forest.

It isn't any wonder that hunter success rates in Washington hover around 25%. And that would be only one deer allowed, per season, per hunter.

In my 7 years of hunting, there has only been one year when I was not one of the 75 out of a 100 that walked out of the woods empty handed. It was a glorious day and the 2&1/2 year old, 3 point buck was one of the hardest earned trophies (not just hunting) of my life.

It seems good that I have had to learn to hunt under these conditions -- if I'd learned how to hunt where the only complaint is that people take spike bucks when they should have and could have taken does, I'd have been finished after the first season out here.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from dave the bowhunter wrote 2 years 40 weeks ago

lol well since ya brought up bows,want my real opinon on bows,ive been bowhuntng for 40 years with a real bow,a recurve and like ya say about the compunds as i call them gun bows with all there sights and triggers and now barrles that they made,as far as iam comcearned they can take the compounds and put them in with the gun season,because thats all they are any how is a gun thats why ya see all these guys on tv shooting deer 50 yards away every shot and hitting right where they want to in the ribs just like shooting a gun with a scope ,put that sight right where ya want it and pull the trigger they all use,, and stand there with it drawed back for a hour at a time that aint bowhunting,i aint seen a compound yet that bows when ya pull it back,like ive said before ,wheres the pedals at its got wheels on it

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from georgeIII wrote 2 years 12 weeks ago

oh my god just sacrifice a little for a lot. if we move the season more people all over the state will have an opportunity to harvest a deer. we all no that shooting doe's is the only way to manage the population, and they can be hard to come by during the rut because of the pressure the bucks put on them. so if it is moved, that would provide more bucks an opportunity to survive (increasing the quality) the year and increase the chance of the so called meat hunters a better shot at filling the freezer with tasty doe meet instead of a stinky 2.5 year old buck that all minnesotans already have a box in there garage filled with racks that nothing will ever hapen too its a discrase. IF YOUR NOT GOING TO MOUNT IT SHOOT A DAMN DOE THEY TASTE MUTCH BETTER.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Boar Slayer wrote 1 year 44 weeks ago

I have been a resident of Pennsylvania for 30 years and a hunter for 42 years. I learned to hunt from an old man who hunted for food and he taught me to be a "meat hunter". I passed this on to my sons. With the complex APR system in place, I have done what many others in my state have done. I stopped deer hunting. My youngest son still sits and stalks, but has not shot a deer since the new regs were instituted. For me, the real reason we hunt has been lost in the never ending need for "trophies". The DNR in PA has effectively shut many of us out of the field and there really is no use to complain. We are told that this is for our own good, they are smarter than us and we probably are not very good hunters anyway. Couple this with the way the rifle season is scheduled and it is easy to see why there are fewer hunters in the field. Pa begins its' deer season the Monday after Thanksgiving.What this means is that deer season has only one Saturday. Since Sunday hunting is illeagl, working people get one day to deer hunt, unless they save vacation days for this purpose.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment