Deer Hunting
Now I was brought up on shooting behind the shoulder, but switched to neck shooting about 3 years ago. I was kind of timid to make this switch to be honest but I have had great fortune with it. My 2 reasons why, 1: you dont ruin any meat 2: its either a miss or a fatal wound (I personally have not seen one deer or heard about a deer running after being shot in the neck). Now where do you aim?
I'm new to deer hunting altogether but neck shots make the most sense to me because it drops the deer faster and kills instantly, however, the neck is a much smaller target and I've heard of a lot of wounded deer from near misses or grazes, while behind the shoulder shots give a much broader target and more likely to inflict a fatal wound. i think it's up to the hunter and how confident he is in his aiming ability and the accuracy of his weapon. someday when I'm a better shot myself i will probably start shooting for the neck but for right now ill try to break that shoulder blade and through the vitals.
i shoot the shoulder.
I still shoulder shoot although I have taken a couple neck shots. Its my experience that I haven't wasted that much more meat by shooting behind the shoulder and I would rather take out some vital organs than rellying on hitting a vein, but I agree the deer I shot in the neck did go right down.
You can make bad shots aiming at either place. The key is to sight in the rifle and take time to shoot it before season to get use to it again. And then shooting at either the neck of shoulders should be fine. WIth that said I still aim behind the front shoulders. Every time I take aim on a whitetail I can here my dad whispering to me "Shoot it in the front shoulders son". I guess that is the only reason I continue to do it.
I vote scapula...if placed correctly you take out the spine, shoulder blades and the top of the lungs. It's absolutely deadly.
Unless you have a steady rest and know the exact range plus your ballistics, etc... The shoulder shot is the ethical, higher percentage shot. A neck shot isn't fatal unless it hits the spine or the jugular. Both are much smaller targets than the lungs and/or shoulder. The neck shot is for above average shooters only. We should continue to teach kids and new hunters to take only the highest percentage shot.
Behind the shoulder if you want to mount your deer a neck shot will not suffice.
Behind the shoulder. There are more vital areas to hit.
I shoot behind the shoulder for all the above reason and this additonal one, most people site in rifles to hit an inch or two high at 100 yards. If you mis calculate the range or forget to shoot low out to point blank then you are almost gaurunteeing a miss. I started out toing that early in the hunting career but stopped when I started shooting the magnums. Most if you sight in 2-3 inches high at 100 will be way high at 200 and still off at 300. You can't get accurate results without shooting point of aim point of impact at 100. It would take a long time to get into the physics of it but I screws up one of your G angles on balistic calculations. Sorry I got a littel nerdy there. but if you sight dead on at 100 then you can do neck shots out to 100 but further than that your chance of missing are going up substantually.
The shoulder has a larger vital area. Unless your shooting from a rest I think it is more ethical to aim for the heart/liver/lungs than the neck.
Behind the shoulder cleaner kill. But one time I had to shoot mine in the neck because it was the only shot I had.
Behind the shoulder is the most ethical, and makes the most sense. Out west most of your shots are at or beyound 150 yards, and the spine becomes a very small target at that distance. The static force of most bullets now days is more than sufficiant to take down an animal. I well places bhind the shoulder shot with an appropiate caliber damages almost no meat.
i was brought up to put the cross hairs right behind the shoulder. i shot a 10 point this year with a arrow hole clean through it`s neck so that turned me off to the whole neck shot thing but if it works for u than use it.
I would aim behing the shoulder. If it does run away, it runs off and you have to stalk it. That is part of being a hunter. Also to shoot it in the neck you have to have a clear shot at the neck. It is quartering away and about to get dark and you have to take a shot, i would hit it behind the shoulder.
behind the shoulder is best a budy of mine shot a buck in the neck and it lived in fact 2 wks later his dad killed it now as far as a perfect kill shot goes i've shot deer in the head
* manily because it was the shot i had play it safe aim behind the shoulder
I am a behind the shoulder person but a neck shoot would kill most likely as fast or faster. One question where to place the shoot, base of the skull or where the neck meets the body? Too close the skull may damage the mount.
Max, usually at the base of the neck is where i try to put it.
Tough question however, I believe it falls in the bullet. I have shot many deer in the shoulder and neck. I have never had a deer run anywhere when shot in the neck. If I do miss it is a clean miss. On the other hand I have made plenty of clean double lung and heart shots on deer that have ran hundreds of yards with not a single drop of blood. When shooting a heavy bonded bullet such as a triple x no big deal. because the bullet leaves a nice exit with a easy to follow blood trail. But when shooting ballistic tips or a really fast light cartridge that blows up on impact you can forget about a blood trail. So if you are hunting really thick cover as I do in Texas no blood trail is very bad. I choose to shoot in the neck because I know it is a clean kill and find or nothing at all!
I knew a guy many years ago shot a buck in the neck. He was getting ready to take a pic and the deer jumped up and ran off never to be seen again. The neck is a small target. Shoot for the lungs or scapula. Last fall I passed on a chance to take a 117 yd neck shot at a 150 class 10 point with a scoped inline.Just too risky the neck and head was all I could see.
I have always shot behind the shoulder. It is a bigger target and easier to get used to. If you use a bow, it gives way better penitration.
They are called the vitals for a reason. Shoot them.
I shoot the shoulder it is a bigger target and it is what I was taught.
behind the shoulder. Honestly I dont save the ribs to eat so on a good placed shot i dont waste any meat i care to eat. I have taken deer with a neck shot but not my prefered method. I passed up the biggest buck i have ever seen still to this day becouse he wouldnt give me a good behind the shoulder shot. I had a neck shot but didnt want to chance it with a bow.
In the shoulder 1/3 down from the top of the back for several reasons. A bullet there will anchor a deer in its tracks. The bullet will shock the spine and destroy the major blood vessels coming from the heart including the aorta. If you hit a little high you will cut the spine. If you pull it left or right you either have a neck shot or a double lung hit.
Be careful neck shots aren't always fatal. Lost a deer bowhunting years back with a neck shot. Must have just missed vitals. tracked for over a mile. Shoulder and beyond works better. you ruin more meat when you lose the deer.
I guess i should have been more specific. I was talking about rifles only. Sorry for the confusion, bow definately behind the shoulder.
Keep in mind a behind-the-shoulder shot is not a guarantee, even with a sufficient round and accurate rifle/good shooter combination. I shot a small doe last year with my 7mm Rem. Mag. I was aiming at the sweet spot behind the shoulder, but the round went a little high. I saw the doe bunch up, limp off a little, try to run and then fall. When I walked to within 30 yards of where I knew my backstraps laid, I was surprised when she jumped up, ran 200 yards and jumped 2 barbed wire fences then trotted off into the woods. I found where she had been bedded down and there was very little blood. I waited 2 hours then stalked into the woods where I had last seen her, I never found any blood or spore, I pushed deer ahead of me 4 times but could never get a good look or clear shot at any of them because the woods were so thick. I searched all day and never found her. The next day my wifes' cousin found her dead 2 miles away. I came out and examined the carcass and found that my round had entered between the spine and the lungs had went through and did not hit any "vitals". Unfortunately the carcass had been visited by coyotes, so the meat was unusable. This just goes to show you that there are no guarantees when it comes to deer hunting, and for the sake of the animals we should always take the most ehtical, high percentage shots.
With a bow, definitely behind the shoulder. With a rifle though I'll take the neck shot if it is presented. I hunt in a thick swamp so shots are never more than 50 yards and a neck shot drops the deer right in its tracks. Like everyone else said, neck shots at longer distances are too risky, much better chance at making a good shot if you aim behind the shoulder.
A proper lung/heart shot should destroy very little meat unless the deer is quartering. There is scarcely enough meat on the ribs to bother with.
That being said, at very close range I might take a neck shot if the deer was facing directly towards or directly away from me.
Shoulder, Why? The same reason why they train police/military to shoot like they do. CENTER MASS shots kill period. I can understand your neck shot theroy though.
I have taken 3 deer with neck shots and the rest behind the shoulder. It all depends on what shot is presented to you and how close you are. Just remember, only take a shot that you are comfortable with!
Read the hunting books and magazine articles by experienced hunters/writers like Jim Zumbo, Wayne Van Zwoll, Jim Carmichael, John Barsness, the late Jack O'Connor, and others. Not one of them recommends neck shots on deer or elk that I recall. Most have positions quite to contrary. The neck vital area is the size of a radiator hose. Quite a small target for most.
Hpoefully, all will make the ethical choice based on good judgement and fact.
i think your safest bet is behind the shoulder ,it gives you the largest kill zone . but that being said i have on several white tails taken the neck shot . because i didn't have a clear shot at the shoulder. what it all boils down to is use commonsense and only take good ethical shots at either area of the body. you can miss and wound the animal in either place .
I rely on the shoulder/chest shot area to hit the vitals.
My hunting buddy in North Dakota has used the neck shot for years and swears by it! His caliber of choice has been the .308win since 1986,and he reloads the Nosler Part for it, I believe the 180gr, for about as long. He has taken Antelope to Moose with this load and I bet over 80% of the game were taken with neck shots. I still believe that vital shots are the money makers.
i like the shoulder area first and if i get that shot. if i want the deer real bad and neck is only shoot and i know i can make that shot i will take it. only shoot to kill and dont chance it.
in my opinion you should be able to hit both behind the shoulder and the neck. sometimes you don't have the option of taking a shoulder shot and you can go to the neck. i shoot shoulder. but neck is an option.
in my opinion you should be able to hit both behind the shoulder and the neck. sometimes you don't have the option of taking a shoulder shot and you can go to the neck. i shoot shoulder. but neck is an option.
if god wanted us to shoot a deer in the neck he wouldn't of put a pair of lungs behind the shoulder! shoot the body.
"God" is always capitalized. Recess is over, go back to class.
I believe that the neck shot is too chancy to take. I personally have never seen a deer not go down from a behind the shoulder shot and virtually no meat is lost. I have, however, found a number of deer dead or dying from someone taking a neck shot. If the spine in the neck is hit the chase is over; if not the results are not usually good. I believe that the neck shot narrows your sure kill area by about 8". Why risk it?
Shoulder...neck is just to small of an area
I aim for the heart and lungs although they may run I feel more comfortable shooting here and with the neck it's seems to important to make a critical hit otherwise all you do is hit tissue and let the deer bleed if shot to high on the neck.
I must reside firmly in the shoulder community. I want to either take out the boiler room or break down the running gears, either is ok with me. I greatly prefer dragging to blood trailing. Way too much room for error in the neck. My brother-in-law shot one in the neck once and it ran for the proverbial country mile before it bled out. Thankfully he did hit the jugular but missed the spine, had he not hit the main line the deer would have a nasty wound and no blood trail to speak of.
Behind the shoulder. It provides the largest area of vitals incase hit is slightly off.
I made the switch to neck shots 10 years ago and haven't looked back. One does not have to hit the spine for a neck shot to be a quick kill. It has been my experience since I have switched that those few shots that I have missed (not bragging because I am very picky about my shots almost to the point that the planets have to be aligned correctly) have been complete misses while every shot I have connected resulted in the deer dropping in his/her tracks. There is a lot of vital stuff in the neck such as the carotid artery, the jugular vein, and at the lower portion of the neck the brachial arteries. There are a lot of nerves and important connective tissue in there too. One may venture to say that the neck itself is one big vital area.
I am not pushing for everyone to try it because one must take the shot one is most comfortable with and is the most consistent with. An additional benefit of taking neck shots is that it has kept me going to the range on a regular basis to continue to hone my marksmanship skills. As with all shots at game whether you are using big magnums or smaller calibers, shot placement is of the utmost importance.
It depends on the shot that presents itself. If it was up to me then I would shoot behind the shoulder. But if a good neck shot presents itself first then why not take it? Otherwise the deer could be gone before you even get a chance at the shoulder.
You are the only one that knows your own abilities as a shooter and if you have always taken a behind the shoulder shot then, like they say :If it aint broke, dont fix it" It seems that the majority of us out there do prefer the shoulder shot but if you know your rifle and know your capabilities then take the neck shot. Distance plays a huge factor in this to. Obviously at long ranges you want to aim for the biggest part of the "Kill Zone" that being the vitals, heart and lungs. At shorter distances a neck shot may be your only option given the terrain you are hunting in, but the shorter distance decreases your chances of serioulsy wounding that animal and putting that bullet where you intended to put it. To each their own of course, I have harvested deer by taking both shots and with the power and design of todays bullets they dont leave much room for error. We all want to bring down an animal in the quickest and most humane way possible, only you know at the time which way that should be. Take Care All.
Buck Boyz
No doubt, a properly placed shot in the neck will drop a deer in its tracks. I am and always have been more comfortable shooting a deer in the vitals. It is a much larger target and increases your harvesting odds. The bottom line is to have your firearm sighted in and knowing exactly where the bullet is going no matter where you aim or a whitetail. You have to have a total confidence in knowing exactly where your bullet is going.
Straight through both shoulders . I like to break them down and the bullet go through into the boiler room.
Post a Reply
I still shoulder shoot although I have taken a couple neck shots. Its my experience that I haven't wasted that much more meat by shooting behind the shoulder and I would rather take out some vital organs than rellying on hitting a vein, but I agree the deer I shot in the neck did go right down.
Behind the shoulder if you want to mount your deer a neck shot will not suffice.
Read the hunting books and magazine articles by experienced hunters/writers like Jim Zumbo, Wayne Van Zwoll, Jim Carmichael, John Barsness, the late Jack O'Connor, and others. Not one of them recommends neck shots on deer or elk that I recall. Most have positions quite to contrary. The neck vital area is the size of a radiator hose. Quite a small target for most.
Hpoefully, all will make the ethical choice based on good judgement and fact.
I'm new to deer hunting altogether but neck shots make the most sense to me because it drops the deer faster and kills instantly, however, the neck is a much smaller target and I've heard of a lot of wounded deer from near misses or grazes, while behind the shoulder shots give a much broader target and more likely to inflict a fatal wound. i think it's up to the hunter and how confident he is in his aiming ability and the accuracy of his weapon. someday when I'm a better shot myself i will probably start shooting for the neck but for right now ill try to break that shoulder blade and through the vitals.
You can make bad shots aiming at either place. The key is to sight in the rifle and take time to shoot it before season to get use to it again. And then shooting at either the neck of shoulders should be fine. WIth that said I still aim behind the front shoulders. Every time I take aim on a whitetail I can here my dad whispering to me "Shoot it in the front shoulders son". I guess that is the only reason I continue to do it.
I shoot behind the shoulder for all the above reason and this additonal one, most people site in rifles to hit an inch or two high at 100 yards. If you mis calculate the range or forget to shoot low out to point blank then you are almost gaurunteeing a miss. I started out toing that early in the hunting career but stopped when I started shooting the magnums. Most if you sight in 2-3 inches high at 100 will be way high at 200 and still off at 300. You can't get accurate results without shooting point of aim point of impact at 100. It would take a long time to get into the physics of it but I screws up one of your G angles on balistic calculations. Sorry I got a littel nerdy there. but if you sight dead on at 100 then you can do neck shots out to 100 but further than that your chance of missing are going up substantually.
Tough question however, I believe it falls in the bullet. I have shot many deer in the shoulder and neck. I have never had a deer run anywhere when shot in the neck. If I do miss it is a clean miss. On the other hand I have made plenty of clean double lung and heart shots on deer that have ran hundreds of yards with not a single drop of blood. When shooting a heavy bonded bullet such as a triple x no big deal. because the bullet leaves a nice exit with a easy to follow blood trail. But when shooting ballistic tips or a really fast light cartridge that blows up on impact you can forget about a blood trail. So if you are hunting really thick cover as I do in Texas no blood trail is very bad. I choose to shoot in the neck because I know it is a clean kill and find or nothing at all!
I knew a guy many years ago shot a buck in the neck. He was getting ready to take a pic and the deer jumped up and ran off never to be seen again. The neck is a small target. Shoot for the lungs or scapula. Last fall I passed on a chance to take a 117 yd neck shot at a 150 class 10 point with a scoped inline.Just too risky the neck and head was all I could see.
behind the shoulder. Honestly I dont save the ribs to eat so on a good placed shot i dont waste any meat i care to eat. I have taken deer with a neck shot but not my prefered method. I passed up the biggest buck i have ever seen still to this day becouse he wouldnt give me a good behind the shoulder shot. I had a neck shot but didnt want to chance it with a bow.
In the shoulder 1/3 down from the top of the back for several reasons. A bullet there will anchor a deer in its tracks. The bullet will shock the spine and destroy the major blood vessels coming from the heart including the aorta. If you hit a little high you will cut the spine. If you pull it left or right you either have a neck shot or a double lung hit.
Be careful neck shots aren't always fatal. Lost a deer bowhunting years back with a neck shot. Must have just missed vitals. tracked for over a mile. Shoulder and beyond works better. you ruin more meat when you lose the deer.
Keep in mind a behind-the-shoulder shot is not a guarantee, even with a sufficient round and accurate rifle/good shooter combination. I shot a small doe last year with my 7mm Rem. Mag. I was aiming at the sweet spot behind the shoulder, but the round went a little high. I saw the doe bunch up, limp off a little, try to run and then fall. When I walked to within 30 yards of where I knew my backstraps laid, I was surprised when she jumped up, ran 200 yards and jumped 2 barbed wire fences then trotted off into the woods. I found where she had been bedded down and there was very little blood. I waited 2 hours then stalked into the woods where I had last seen her, I never found any blood or spore, I pushed deer ahead of me 4 times but could never get a good look or clear shot at any of them because the woods were so thick. I searched all day and never found her. The next day my wifes' cousin found her dead 2 miles away. I came out and examined the carcass and found that my round had entered between the spine and the lungs had went through and did not hit any "vitals". Unfortunately the carcass had been visited by coyotes, so the meat was unusable. This just goes to show you that there are no guarantees when it comes to deer hunting, and for the sake of the animals we should always take the most ehtical, high percentage shots.
Shoulder, Why? The same reason why they train police/military to shoot like they do. CENTER MASS shots kill period. I can understand your neck shot theroy though.
I rely on the shoulder/chest shot area to hit the vitals.
My hunting buddy in North Dakota has used the neck shot for years and swears by it! His caliber of choice has been the .308win since 1986,and he reloads the Nosler Part for it, I believe the 180gr, for about as long. He has taken Antelope to Moose with this load and I bet over 80% of the game were taken with neck shots. I still believe that vital shots are the money makers.
i shoot the shoulder.
I vote scapula...if placed correctly you take out the spine, shoulder blades and the top of the lungs. It's absolutely deadly.
Unless you have a steady rest and know the exact range plus your ballistics, etc... The shoulder shot is the ethical, higher percentage shot. A neck shot isn't fatal unless it hits the spine or the jugular. Both are much smaller targets than the lungs and/or shoulder. The neck shot is for above average shooters only. We should continue to teach kids and new hunters to take only the highest percentage shot.
Behind the shoulder. There are more vital areas to hit.
Behind the shoulder cleaner kill. But one time I had to shoot mine in the neck because it was the only shot I had.
Behind the shoulder is the most ethical, and makes the most sense. Out west most of your shots are at or beyound 150 yards, and the spine becomes a very small target at that distance. The static force of most bullets now days is more than sufficiant to take down an animal. I well places bhind the shoulder shot with an appropiate caliber damages almost no meat.
* manily because it was the shot i had play it safe aim behind the shoulder
They are called the vitals for a reason. Shoot them.
A proper lung/heart shot should destroy very little meat unless the deer is quartering. There is scarcely enough meat on the ribs to bother with.
That being said, at very close range I might take a neck shot if the deer was facing directly towards or directly away from me.
I have taken 3 deer with neck shots and the rest behind the shoulder. It all depends on what shot is presented to you and how close you are. Just remember, only take a shot that you are comfortable with!
i think your safest bet is behind the shoulder ,it gives you the largest kill zone . but that being said i have on several white tails taken the neck shot . because i didn't have a clear shot at the shoulder. what it all boils down to is use commonsense and only take good ethical shots at either area of the body. you can miss and wound the animal in either place .
i like the shoulder area first and if i get that shot. if i want the deer real bad and neck is only shoot and i know i can make that shot i will take it. only shoot to kill and dont chance it.
The shoulder has a larger vital area. Unless your shooting from a rest I think it is more ethical to aim for the heart/liver/lungs than the neck.
I would aim behing the shoulder. If it does run away, it runs off and you have to stalk it. That is part of being a hunter. Also to shoot it in the neck you have to have a clear shot at the neck. It is quartering away and about to get dark and you have to take a shot, i would hit it behind the shoulder.
behind the shoulder is best a budy of mine shot a buck in the neck and it lived in fact 2 wks later his dad killed it now as far as a perfect kill shot goes i've shot deer in the head
I am a behind the shoulder person but a neck shoot would kill most likely as fast or faster. One question where to place the shoot, base of the skull or where the neck meets the body? Too close the skull may damage the mount.
Max, usually at the base of the neck is where i try to put it.
I have always shot behind the shoulder. It is a bigger target and easier to get used to. If you use a bow, it gives way better penitration.
I shoot the shoulder it is a bigger target and it is what I was taught.
I guess i should have been more specific. I was talking about rifles only. Sorry for the confusion, bow definately behind the shoulder.
With a bow, definitely behind the shoulder. With a rifle though I'll take the neck shot if it is presented. I hunt in a thick swamp so shots are never more than 50 yards and a neck shot drops the deer right in its tracks. Like everyone else said, neck shots at longer distances are too risky, much better chance at making a good shot if you aim behind the shoulder.
in my opinion you should be able to hit both behind the shoulder and the neck. sometimes you don't have the option of taking a shoulder shot and you can go to the neck. i shoot shoulder. but neck is an option.
in my opinion you should be able to hit both behind the shoulder and the neck. sometimes you don't have the option of taking a shoulder shot and you can go to the neck. i shoot shoulder. but neck is an option.
if god wanted us to shoot a deer in the neck he wouldn't of put a pair of lungs behind the shoulder! shoot the body.
"God" is always capitalized. Recess is over, go back to class.
I believe that the neck shot is too chancy to take. I personally have never seen a deer not go down from a behind the shoulder shot and virtually no meat is lost. I have, however, found a number of deer dead or dying from someone taking a neck shot. If the spine in the neck is hit the chase is over; if not the results are not usually good. I believe that the neck shot narrows your sure kill area by about 8". Why risk it?
Shoulder...neck is just to small of an area
I aim for the heart and lungs although they may run I feel more comfortable shooting here and with the neck it's seems to important to make a critical hit otherwise all you do is hit tissue and let the deer bleed if shot to high on the neck.
I must reside firmly in the shoulder community. I want to either take out the boiler room or break down the running gears, either is ok with me. I greatly prefer dragging to blood trailing. Way too much room for error in the neck. My brother-in-law shot one in the neck once and it ran for the proverbial country mile before it bled out. Thankfully he did hit the jugular but missed the spine, had he not hit the main line the deer would have a nasty wound and no blood trail to speak of.
Behind the shoulder. It provides the largest area of vitals incase hit is slightly off.
I made the switch to neck shots 10 years ago and haven't looked back. One does not have to hit the spine for a neck shot to be a quick kill. It has been my experience since I have switched that those few shots that I have missed (not bragging because I am very picky about my shots almost to the point that the planets have to be aligned correctly) have been complete misses while every shot I have connected resulted in the deer dropping in his/her tracks. There is a lot of vital stuff in the neck such as the carotid artery, the jugular vein, and at the lower portion of the neck the brachial arteries. There are a lot of nerves and important connective tissue in there too. One may venture to say that the neck itself is one big vital area.
I am not pushing for everyone to try it because one must take the shot one is most comfortable with and is the most consistent with. An additional benefit of taking neck shots is that it has kept me going to the range on a regular basis to continue to hone my marksmanship skills. As with all shots at game whether you are using big magnums or smaller calibers, shot placement is of the utmost importance.
It depends on the shot that presents itself. If it was up to me then I would shoot behind the shoulder. But if a good neck shot presents itself first then why not take it? Otherwise the deer could be gone before you even get a chance at the shoulder.
You are the only one that knows your own abilities as a shooter and if you have always taken a behind the shoulder shot then, like they say :If it aint broke, dont fix it" It seems that the majority of us out there do prefer the shoulder shot but if you know your rifle and know your capabilities then take the neck shot. Distance plays a huge factor in this to. Obviously at long ranges you want to aim for the biggest part of the "Kill Zone" that being the vitals, heart and lungs. At shorter distances a neck shot may be your only option given the terrain you are hunting in, but the shorter distance decreases your chances of serioulsy wounding that animal and putting that bullet where you intended to put it. To each their own of course, I have harvested deer by taking both shots and with the power and design of todays bullets they dont leave much room for error. We all want to bring down an animal in the quickest and most humane way possible, only you know at the time which way that should be. Take Care All.
Buck Boyz
No doubt, a properly placed shot in the neck will drop a deer in its tracks. I am and always have been more comfortable shooting a deer in the vitals. It is a much larger target and increases your harvesting odds. The bottom line is to have your firearm sighted in and knowing exactly where the bullet is going no matter where you aim or a whitetail. You have to have a total confidence in knowing exactly where your bullet is going.
Straight through both shoulders . I like to break them down and the bullet go through into the boiler room.
i was brought up to put the cross hairs right behind the shoulder. i shot a 10 point this year with a arrow hole clean through it`s neck so that turned me off to the whole neck shot thing but if it works for u than use it.
Post a Reply