Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Safari Club International Convention Photos

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

The Gun Nuts
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

January 31, 2007

Safari Club International Convention Photos

By David E. Petzal and Phil Bourjaily

Shotguns for $160,000. Jewelry carved from mammoth tusk. $12,000 plain-stocked rifles. You can't afford this stuff, but you can look at the pictures. See them here.

Comments (13)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Sharon wrote 7 years 5 weeks ago

Can anyone give me an estimate on the value of a Manton double rifle in .470 caliber?Sharon

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from John Dale wrote 7 years 8 weeks ago

What is beatiful about a rifle or pistol or even a revolver, is not the cost or what it looks like. It is how it shots and the op-ptunity to shot, plus I guess the cost for you have to be able to purchase it. That means a 160,000 for a gun, is so far out of reach for the average person it sounds stupid for antone buying such a thing. Why not invest with a re-sponsible trader that can actually get a good return on your money, and that would get a faster return. Unless you are the type who likes to rub in the faces of others, and that will not work here for I would rather shot a ragged gun that really shoots than one I can just look at.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jack Roe wrote 7 years 9 weeks ago

Despite the high cost, which is probably a write-off anyway, think of what the money is used for................

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Sokolik wrote 7 years 9 weeks ago

The Shot show and SCI Conventions unite and bring the whole Shooting sport/ outdoor fraternity together, and we need that.As to the value, I agree land is a better value, but let the "Market" determnine the demand.If no one one purchased the items, they would soon disappear."Let the Market Prosper."Alex SokolikLifetime SCILifetime RMEFwww.realty1031sales.com

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

To PbHead: Wayne did propose just such a project last fall, for a great deal of money. I told him no thanks. Probably the most offensive thing at the Show was the paintings of rich guys leering happily over the bodies of animals they had killed, and which would have killed them had it not been for the PH and the trackers.to James Florence: I know the rifle of which you speak. It was at the convention last year, too. No one wants to buy the thing. A quarter mil for the gun and a quarter mil for the orthopedic surgeon after you shoot it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

To PbHead: Wayne did propose just such a project last fall, for a great deal of money. I told him no thanks. Probably the most offensive thing at the Show was the paintings of rich guys leering happily over the bodies of animals they had killed, and which would have killed them had it not been for the PH and the trackers.to James Florence: I know the rifle of which you speak. It was at the convention last year, too. No one wants to buy the thing. A quarter mil for the gun and a quarter mil for the orthopedic surgeon after you shoot it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

To PbHead: Wayne did propose just such a project last fall, for a great deal of money. I told him no thanks. Probably the most offensive thing at the Show was the paintings of rich guys leering happily over the bodies of animals they had killed, and which would have killed them had it not been for the PH and the trackers.to James Florence: I know the rifle of which you speak. It was at the convention last year, too. No one wants to buy the thing. A quarter mil for the gun and a quarter mil for the orthopedic surgeon after you shoot it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from James Florence wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

$160,000 is a steal relative to the $269,000 asking price for a double rifle in 470NE that I saw. This unquestionably beautiful gun was sitting next to a double 700NE for a paltry $105,000. Perhaps the prospect of shooting a double .70 caliber rifle knocked a bit off the price.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from PbHead wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

Thanks for the look at the finer things in life. I suggest that you contract with Wayne McLaughlin of Blue Loon Fine Arts to paint a portrait of you and your trophy Nauga when you return from Africa.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

Dave,For the same money I could buy 80 acres in Indiana to hunt on. It too would appreciate 30 to 50 percent over 10 years and I could truly enjoy the property over that time. If you shoot the fancy gun the value goes down. My property value (even if left unimproved) will only go up.I guess we just look @ things from a different standpoint.Jim

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

To js street: If you bought that Fabbri today at $160,000 and took care of it, the gun's value would increase by 30 and 50 percent in the next 10 years. That's a pretty good reason.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

Yes, jstreet, I agree, but like being a pro-ball player it's not about practical needs, it's about status. We complain,but if I had just signed by contract making 2 million a year, for 5 years; I would have my photo taken with DP holding that 160k shotgun.Smile and say Cheeeese*

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

Maybe it's just jealousy, but I can't understand why anyone in their right mind would spend $12,000.00 on a rifle, much less $160,000.00 on a shotgun.Does the phrase "more money than sense" come to anyone else's mind.Jim

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from Sharon wrote 7 years 5 weeks ago

Can anyone give me an estimate on the value of a Manton double rifle in .470 caliber?Sharon

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from John Dale wrote 7 years 8 weeks ago

What is beatiful about a rifle or pistol or even a revolver, is not the cost or what it looks like. It is how it shots and the op-ptunity to shot, plus I guess the cost for you have to be able to purchase it. That means a 160,000 for a gun, is so far out of reach for the average person it sounds stupid for antone buying such a thing. Why not invest with a re-sponsible trader that can actually get a good return on your money, and that would get a faster return. Unless you are the type who likes to rub in the faces of others, and that will not work here for I would rather shot a ragged gun that really shoots than one I can just look at.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jack Roe wrote 7 years 9 weeks ago

Despite the high cost, which is probably a write-off anyway, think of what the money is used for................

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Alex Sokolik wrote 7 years 9 weeks ago

The Shot show and SCI Conventions unite and bring the whole Shooting sport/ outdoor fraternity together, and we need that.As to the value, I agree land is a better value, but let the "Market" determnine the demand.If no one one purchased the items, they would soon disappear."Let the Market Prosper."Alex SokolikLifetime SCILifetime RMEFwww.realty1031sales.com

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

To PbHead: Wayne did propose just such a project last fall, for a great deal of money. I told him no thanks. Probably the most offensive thing at the Show was the paintings of rich guys leering happily over the bodies of animals they had killed, and which would have killed them had it not been for the PH and the trackers.to James Florence: I know the rifle of which you speak. It was at the convention last year, too. No one wants to buy the thing. A quarter mil for the gun and a quarter mil for the orthopedic surgeon after you shoot it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

To PbHead: Wayne did propose just such a project last fall, for a great deal of money. I told him no thanks. Probably the most offensive thing at the Show was the paintings of rich guys leering happily over the bodies of animals they had killed, and which would have killed them had it not been for the PH and the trackers.to James Florence: I know the rifle of which you speak. It was at the convention last year, too. No one wants to buy the thing. A quarter mil for the gun and a quarter mil for the orthopedic surgeon after you shoot it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

To PbHead: Wayne did propose just such a project last fall, for a great deal of money. I told him no thanks. Probably the most offensive thing at the Show was the paintings of rich guys leering happily over the bodies of animals they had killed, and which would have killed them had it not been for the PH and the trackers.to James Florence: I know the rifle of which you speak. It was at the convention last year, too. No one wants to buy the thing. A quarter mil for the gun and a quarter mil for the orthopedic surgeon after you shoot it.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from James Florence wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

$160,000 is a steal relative to the $269,000 asking price for a double rifle in 470NE that I saw. This unquestionably beautiful gun was sitting next to a double 700NE for a paltry $105,000. Perhaps the prospect of shooting a double .70 caliber rifle knocked a bit off the price.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from PbHead wrote 7 years 10 weeks ago

Thanks for the look at the finer things in life. I suggest that you contract with Wayne McLaughlin of Blue Loon Fine Arts to paint a portrait of you and your trophy Nauga when you return from Africa.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

Dave,For the same money I could buy 80 acres in Indiana to hunt on. It too would appreciate 30 to 50 percent over 10 years and I could truly enjoy the property over that time. If you shoot the fancy gun the value goes down. My property value (even if left unimproved) will only go up.I guess we just look @ things from a different standpoint.Jim

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dave Petzal wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

To js street: If you bought that Fabbri today at $160,000 and took care of it, the gun's value would increase by 30 and 50 percent in the next 10 years. That's a pretty good reason.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Ralph the Rifleman wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

Yes, jstreet, I agree, but like being a pro-ball player it's not about practical needs, it's about status. We complain,but if I had just signed by contract making 2 million a year, for 5 years; I would have my photo taken with DP holding that 160k shotgun.Smile and say Cheeeese*

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jstreet wrote 7 years 11 weeks ago

Maybe it's just jealousy, but I can't understand why anyone in their right mind would spend $12,000.00 on a rifle, much less $160,000.00 on a shotgun.Does the phrase "more money than sense" come to anyone else's mind.Jim

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment