Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Petzal's Picks: The Best New Rifles for '09

Petzal's Picks: The Best New Rifles for '09

Rate This Gallery80%20%
1 of 8
bestrifles_01

Photo Gallery Comments (29)

Top Rated
All Comments
from streack wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

Dave,
That E.R. Shaw is a dandy. Is that a picture of the rifle you just bought? I am only guessing based on the fact that it is built for a south paw.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from herbie57_57 wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

I'm not a big Mossburg fan but I kind of like those stocks on the 4x4s.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from kolbster wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

i love the AR-15 22lr, ive been wanting one of these for years. and now colt makes them, so ill know they will be high quality.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scrap5000 wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

Savage and Colt .22 all the way!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from eswinsick wrote 43 weeks 18 hours ago

Dave,

Read your reviews on the guns for 09. I'm surprised that you would select these rifles without any shooting data. It's like picking a new car without driving it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 42 weeks 6 days ago

A Savage is such a good rifle but so dang ugly. I am constantly struggling not to buy one. I like the ER Shaw mainly because its what I would imagine an imaginary Savage Custom Shop would produce.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from z wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

Look into a Savage model 111 chambered in 30-06 very fine hunting rifle, great @ 100yards plus.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from peter wrote 42 weeks 2 days ago

some nice new guns

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 42 weeks 2 days ago

custom rifle? $650? anyone know any good recipes for hat?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 41 weeks 6 days ago

The new version of the T/C is probably a really good move from the selling standpoint as it provides a quality piece at an affordable price. I remember when I could say that about Remington. Savage is definately on the ball and looks like they intend to keep it rolling. Over the years I have never owned a Savage but have seen a few I wanted but the owners would not let go of them and those particular models were no longer available. I better look these new Savages over as well as the E R Shaw which really draws my attention filling my head with all sorts of ideas. I personally don't like the stocks on the Mossbergs but feel Colt will sell some of their AR's in .22 since the base price is not a lot more than many .22 LR rifles already on the market.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 41 weeks 3 days ago

All:

I've got an E.R. Shaw Mark VII bolt-action rifle on order in .257 Ackley Improved. It will be my first left-hand bolt action rifle. The rifle will come with a laminated stock and a 24" fluted barrel and will look almost exactly like the rifle in the SHOT picture. It cost me around $850 (I paid for it about 5 or 6 months ago and am waiting for it to be built and shipped to my local gunshop).

I sure hope the E.R. Shaw rifle will shoot well--I'm aiming (pun intended) for MOA or sub-MOA performance with the right handloads. The rifle will weigh around 8lbs. without a scope and will probably be a little heavy for everyday field use, but I knew that when I ordered it, so I have no right to complain. I didn't order the significantly lighter synthetic stock E.R. Shaw had available because I have one just like it on my Savage bolt-action rifle in .270 Winchester, and that particular rifle, although light in weight, easy to carry, and always very accurate, is just so damn ugly that I wince when I see it and can only somehow stomach my revulsion and bare to take it into the field these days when the weather is raining, sleeting, snowing, with zero-visibility fog, or is otherwise completely awful. My Savage is a perfectly hideous rifle perfectly appropriate for perfectly hideous weather.

I ordered the laminated stock for the E.R. Shaw rifle because I'm just not strong enough these days to have two worse-than-outhouse-ugly rifles in my possession at any one time. I just know I'd end up putting the Savage out on the country road where I live with a sign on it saying,
"Orphaned. Please Rescue Me."

T.W. Davidson

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jesse wrote 41 weeks 3 days ago

I like rifles that r acurate right out of the box becals i dont haft to use that much ammo to make shure ther on target

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from reischjake wrote 41 weeks 1 day ago

Im not sure that i would buy a .22 for $500 but it would sure look cool.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 39 weeks 3 days ago

An expensive .22 rimfire AR always seemed to me to be something like buying a Corvette with a 5-horse Tecumseh lawnmower engine under the hood, but I suppose it will be valuable as a trainer if used with small targets. My $650 will go for one of those Shaw rifles. Wow.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bigbuck14 wrote 38 weeks 6 days ago

That savage classic gentlemens rifle is a nice gun only if it was a 30-06

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bigbuck14 wrote 38 weeks 6 days ago

What is up with all this tactical hunting guns us hunters are not in the army!!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from poco1994 wrote 37 weeks 6 days ago

wow technology has really advanced!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from DustinW wrote 37 weeks 4 days ago

Cool.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CPT BRAD wrote 36 weeks 5 days ago

hideous barrel nut??? Savages are great rifles I'll definitly be lookind at the E R Shaw

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Reid Jones wrote 33 weeks 16 hours ago

What's the point of an ar-15 that shoots such a weak bullet.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nayrkceb wrote 31 weeks 5 days ago

That ar-15 is nice, and since its made by the same people that made the m4, this should be good. And is that an ACOG on there?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from BigWoodsHunter57 wrote 20 weeks 2 days ago

Im very interested in this new T/C rifle...if it shoots as good as my Icon, this rifle for its price is a steal!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 270WSM wrote 19 weeks 3 days ago

better than my 25-06

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bobcatdemo wrote 19 weeks 2 days ago

I'd like to get my hands on that new AR-15.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rudyglove27 wrote 18 weeks 3 days ago

I do not mind too!!! Getting my hands on that new AR-15.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rezavoirdog wrote 8 weeks 6 days ago

I just bought the new .250-06 Savage 111FNS with AccuStock and AccuTrigger. Yeah, it's an ugly gun, but what elk, deer, pronghorn or coyote cared HOW the gun looked that killed 'em?!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Micheal Jackson wrote 4 weeks 3 days ago

i like guns speacily the shiny ones they make me happy

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mihunter wrote 1 week 2 days ago

Im guessing the colt .22 is the reason why i cant find .22 ammo anywhere haha. Everyone is so worried about finding .223 they are buying these colts in .22 and buying whole stores out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoot423 wrote 17 hours 54 min ago

Ah... Dave...Picture 4 is a Merkel KR1, not an Anschutz Model 1770 .223. But then, you kept calling the Merkel an Anschutz in your blog. Time to have the staff proof-read your work a little closer. I have the KR1 left hand .270 that you reviewed back in the summer and it is a superb sporting firearm. In case you have forgotten, the KR1 is a switch-barrel, switch-bolt rifle. You can switch calibers from .223 through .338 magnum and the bolts can be switched from a right hand bolt to a left hand bolt. Right now, the Germans that make this gun think that stocks should have either a left hand or right hand cheekpiece stock. I disagree. The stock should be neutral so that the rifle may be switched from right hand to left hand simply by replacing the bolt assembly. The rifle has a light trigger pull of two pounds or less..it's so light I haven't bothered to measure it. The trigger can also be used in the set mode for release with just a thought. I also bought a spare 9.3X62 barrel for the rifle. It has already taken a couple or feral porkers here in Tennessee.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from herbie57_57 wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

I'm not a big Mossburg fan but I kind of like those stocks on the 4x4s.

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from Scrap5000 wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

Savage and Colt .22 all the way!

+4 Good Comment? | | Report
from T.W. Davidson wrote 41 weeks 3 days ago

All:

I've got an E.R. Shaw Mark VII bolt-action rifle on order in .257 Ackley Improved. It will be my first left-hand bolt action rifle. The rifle will come with a laminated stock and a 24" fluted barrel and will look almost exactly like the rifle in the SHOT picture. It cost me around $850 (I paid for it about 5 or 6 months ago and am waiting for it to be built and shipped to my local gunshop).

I sure hope the E.R. Shaw rifle will shoot well--I'm aiming (pun intended) for MOA or sub-MOA performance with the right handloads. The rifle will weigh around 8lbs. without a scope and will probably be a little heavy for everyday field use, but I knew that when I ordered it, so I have no right to complain. I didn't order the significantly lighter synthetic stock E.R. Shaw had available because I have one just like it on my Savage bolt-action rifle in .270 Winchester, and that particular rifle, although light in weight, easy to carry, and always very accurate, is just so damn ugly that I wince when I see it and can only somehow stomach my revulsion and bare to take it into the field these days when the weather is raining, sleeting, snowing, with zero-visibility fog, or is otherwise completely awful. My Savage is a perfectly hideous rifle perfectly appropriate for perfectly hideous weather.

I ordered the laminated stock for the E.R. Shaw rifle because I'm just not strong enough these days to have two worse-than-outhouse-ugly rifles in my possession at any one time. I just know I'd end up putting the Savage out on the country road where I live with a sign on it saying,
"Orphaned. Please Rescue Me."

T.W. Davidson

+3 Good Comment? | | Report
from streack wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

Dave,
That E.R. Shaw is a dandy. Is that a picture of the rifle you just bought? I am only guessing based on the fact that it is built for a south paw.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from kolbster wrote 43 weeks 1 day ago

i love the AR-15 22lr, ive been wanting one of these for years. and now colt makes them, so ill know they will be high quality.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from eswinsick wrote 43 weeks 18 hours ago

Dave,

Read your reviews on the guns for 09. I'm surprised that you would select these rifles without any shooting data. It's like picking a new car without driving it.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from focusfront wrote 39 weeks 3 days ago

An expensive .22 rimfire AR always seemed to me to be something like buying a Corvette with a 5-horse Tecumseh lawnmower engine under the hood, but I suppose it will be valuable as a trainer if used with small targets. My $650 will go for one of those Shaw rifles. Wow.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 42 weeks 6 days ago

A Savage is such a good rifle but so dang ugly. I am constantly struggling not to buy one. I like the ER Shaw mainly because its what I would imagine an imaginary Savage Custom Shop would produce.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Jesse wrote 41 weeks 3 days ago

I like rifles that r acurate right out of the box becals i dont haft to use that much ammo to make shure ther on target

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from reischjake wrote 41 weeks 1 day ago

Im not sure that i would buy a .22 for $500 but it would sure look cool.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from rezavoirdog wrote 8 weeks 6 days ago

I just bought the new .250-06 Savage 111FNS with AccuStock and AccuTrigger. Yeah, it's an ugly gun, but what elk, deer, pronghorn or coyote cared HOW the gun looked that killed 'em?!

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from z wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

Look into a Savage model 111 chambered in 30-06 very fine hunting rifle, great @ 100yards plus.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from peter wrote 42 weeks 2 days ago

some nice new guns

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from shane wrote 42 weeks 2 days ago

custom rifle? $650? anyone know any good recipes for hat?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from ishawooa wrote 41 weeks 6 days ago

The new version of the T/C is probably a really good move from the selling standpoint as it provides a quality piece at an affordable price. I remember when I could say that about Remington. Savage is definately on the ball and looks like they intend to keep it rolling. Over the years I have never owned a Savage but have seen a few I wanted but the owners would not let go of them and those particular models were no longer available. I better look these new Savages over as well as the E R Shaw which really draws my attention filling my head with all sorts of ideas. I personally don't like the stocks on the Mossbergs but feel Colt will sell some of their AR's in .22 since the base price is not a lot more than many .22 LR rifles already on the market.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bigbuck14 wrote 38 weeks 6 days ago

That savage classic gentlemens rifle is a nice gun only if it was a 30-06

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Bigbuck14 wrote 38 weeks 6 days ago

What is up with all this tactical hunting guns us hunters are not in the army!!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from poco1994 wrote 37 weeks 6 days ago

wow technology has really advanced!!!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from DustinW wrote 37 weeks 4 days ago

Cool.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from CPT BRAD wrote 36 weeks 5 days ago

hideous barrel nut??? Savages are great rifles I'll definitly be lookind at the E R Shaw

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Reid Jones wrote 33 weeks 16 hours ago

What's the point of an ar-15 that shoots such a weak bullet.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Nayrkceb wrote 31 weeks 5 days ago

That ar-15 is nice, and since its made by the same people that made the m4, this should be good. And is that an ACOG on there?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from BigWoodsHunter57 wrote 20 weeks 2 days ago

Im very interested in this new T/C rifle...if it shoots as good as my Icon, this rifle for its price is a steal!

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from 270WSM wrote 19 weeks 3 days ago

better than my 25-06

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from bobcatdemo wrote 19 weeks 2 days ago

I'd like to get my hands on that new AR-15.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from rudyglove27 wrote 18 weeks 3 days ago

I do not mind too!!! Getting my hands on that new AR-15.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Micheal Jackson wrote 4 weeks 3 days ago

i like guns speacily the shiny ones they make me happy

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from mihunter wrote 1 week 2 days ago

Im guessing the colt .22 is the reason why i cant find .22 ammo anywhere haha. Everyone is so worried about finding .223 they are buying these colts in .22 and buying whole stores out.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hoot423 wrote 17 hours 54 min ago

Ah... Dave...Picture 4 is a Merkel KR1, not an Anschutz Model 1770 .223. But then, you kept calling the Merkel an Anschutz in your blog. Time to have the staff proof-read your work a little closer. I have the KR1 left hand .270 that you reviewed back in the summer and it is a superb sporting firearm. In case you have forgotten, the KR1 is a switch-barrel, switch-bolt rifle. You can switch calibers from .223 through .338 magnum and the bolts can be switched from a right hand bolt to a left hand bolt. Right now, the Germans that make this gun think that stocks should have either a left hand or right hand cheekpiece stock. I disagree. The stock should be neutral so that the rifle may be switched from right hand to left hand simply by replacing the bolt assembly. The rifle has a light trigger pull of two pounds or less..it's so light I haven't bothered to measure it. The trigger can also be used in the set mode for release with just a thought. I also bought a spare 9.3X62 barrel for the rifle. It has already taken a couple or feral porkers here in Tennessee.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment