Line and Lure Weights on Rod Labels Aren’t Gospel, Merely Suggestions

Just about every fishing rod you own or might consider buying has a label on the rod butt stating line … Continued

httpswww.fieldandstream.comsitesfieldandstream.comfilesimport2014importBlogPostembedJMrodRating.jpg

Just about every fishing rod you own or might consider buying has a label on the rod butt stating line weight and/or lure weight (depending on rod type). Ever stop to think about what those labels really mean? Chances are it’s not exactly what you think.

Fly rods are pretty straightforward. A “5-weight” designation simply means the rod was designed to cast a 5-weight fly line, and you can buy a matching line accordingly. Of course, depending on your personal casting style and the rod’s intended use, you might be happier with a 6-weight line on the rod or maybe a 4-weight. But that’s a purgatory I’m going to skip for the moment.

Spinning and baitcasting rods are more complicated. Usually there’s a designated line-weight range and a lure-weight range, of which the rod-butt label in the photo above is one example. Most people seem to take these numbers as absolute limits, which is a mistake. The numbers are not matters of fact. They are merely suggestions and as such are a little misleading.

The lure-weight range is the biggest problem. That’s because any given rod designed for casting will cast best with a very specific weight–not a range of weights. Typically, the ideal weight for a rod’s “sweet spot” is roughly two-thirds of the way up the designated lure range.

This will vary somewhat among different rods, but it remains true that no rod will cast a one-quarter-ounce weight and a 1-ounce weight equally well. The lightest weight in a designated range probably won’t bend the rod sufficiently in casting. And the heaviest weight will likely overload the rod, making it feel mushy in casting. So I take any designated weight-range to be more manufacturer’s optimism than anything else.

The line-weight range is equally fallacious, but for different reasons. In putting the question to many rod companies over many years, I’ve been left with something like this: “Well, we made a light-power, fast-action spinning rod that we think most people are going to use for smallmouth bass. That typically involves 6- to 10-pound mono line, so that’s the line rating we put on the rod. It’s just based on what we think people are going to do with it.”

Such a line-weight rating does not means you can’t use 4-pound mono or 10-pound if you want–maybe even 20-pound braid. Nothing wrong with that either. In this case, common sense in choosing an appropriate line is more important than what it says on the rod label.

As you might by now have guessed, I don’t rely much on rod-butt labels. They serve as kind of a general guide among rod choices. But when it’s time to get my checkbook out, the rod’s feel in my hand and–ideally–a bit of test casting are what makes or breaks the choice.