Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
  • Log in with Facebook
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Cabela's LSi Fly Rod: A Balance of Functionality and Price

Recent Comments

Categories

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndicate

Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My AOL

FlyTalk
in your Inbox

Enter your email address to get our new post everyday.

August 10, 2011

Cabela's LSi Fly Rod: A Balance of Functionality and Price

by Kirk Deeter

Let's cut right to brass tacks.  Sure, we can talk about fancy graphite technologies and all the other stuff that makes a $750 fly rod a $750 fly rod... but in truth, 99 percent of fly casters cannot honestly feel the difference. (It's like me and a $10 bottle of red wine vs. a $30 bottle... I sniff, I swirl, I roll my tongue, and then I go get a PBR from the cooler.) 

And in fairness, there are a lot of cheap rods that are exactly that--cheap. Not just inexpensive. Cheap. As in, "Why did I pay $100 for this piece of junk that casts like a curtain rod, and is already falling apart?"

The holy grail for fly rod marketers, therefore, is finding that sweet spot of maximum functionality, at a minimum price.  And based on the fishing I have done this summer with over two dozen different rods--and more importantly, having put different options in the hands of other casters, from total beginners to guides--the Cabela's LSi lives in that sweet spot. I've fished 4-weight and a 5-weight versions of LSi, both 8'-6" long.  They cost $180.

LSi stands for "line speed improved" and I would agree that the action is fast, so the rod feels light and zippy.  But it's not one of those "fast for the sake of fast" rods.  I never have been a fan of "casting" fly rods, because I like to use fly rods for fishing, not necessarily casting.  And to me, a good fishing rod is one that can punch a decent wind cast into a stiff breeze, but also perform gently as you lift and mend, roll cast, and all of that.  I found, over the course of this summer's fishing in both small creeks and on bigger rivers, that I kept picking up the LSi on my way out the door because it was versatile, and it was the rod I felt comfortable with.

Of course, nothing replaces good casting technique (which comes through practice, not the rod you use) when it comes to effective fly fishing.  But if you're looking for a good all-around rod at a decent price, this is a solid choice.

I'll be at the International Fly Tackle Dealer trade show next week, and I'm sure I'll hear all about the 2012 rods from many companies. But Cabela's LSi is one standard from 2011 they'll have to beat.  I'll let you know what I see and hear.

 

 

Comments (10)

Top Rated
All Comments
from Sayfu wrote 41 weeks 19 hours ago

Does Cabelas make it, or just mark up a rod made by someone else? I don't think they make it. What action are the rods?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from peconic wrote 41 weeks 15 hours ago

I have the 9' 4# and I LOVE IT!! And guess what? The hundreds of fish I have caught on it don't seem to care that I got for less than $200. Also must say I have fished next to plenty of guys with expensive rods and never felt like I didn't catch a fish or couldn't cast to a fish because of my rod.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 41 weeks 4 hours ago

I have to also make this observation about the rods I see on the market today. There is not much junk out there. The consumer is much more informed. Sloppy, poor performing rods don't sell, and go back a few years, and they had a lot of glass in them that made them sloppy. Not so today. A rod around $100 is generally a good rod, and often they will give you an across the counter guarantee rather than the time delay, and the expense of having an expensive rod replaced. A lot of it is about the action, and that can be personal according to your stroke. Few, want to talk about the action of the rod. I contacted the guy that originated the article about the expensive Sage Rod..THE ONE, that is supposed to cast so accurately. I asked him what the action was, and he said, "try it, it is very responsive" My thought is, "responsive for who?" And to many, owning an expensive rod is proud ownership. I drive a Hyundai, but sure would like to own a Porche.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 40 weeks 6 days ago

Sayfu, I agree with your comment about the quality of rods on the market. Have purchased a couple beater rods (rods that I do not care if they break) over the last couple years and have been pleased with not just the action but the cork, guide wrappings and attached hardware. Has not changed my mind about expensive rods. I love them not just for the action but overall quality.

It is worth pointing out that any rod with the right line, leader and fly should cast good enough to catch fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

The way I see it, is..early on !M6 graphite made a good action rod. As the graphite matting increased in modulus allowing for a slightly lighter rod, and a stronger rod per wt. making for a quicker recovery rod there is a difference. It is negligible to most, and the cost is quite higher in part because the advanced graphite matting is considerably more expensive. Then they dress them up with more expensive hardware, and the person wanting such a rod is willing to pay the xtra price. Now, they are even using expensive epoxy in the high end rods. But, as you say, the hardware is quite acceptable, and the IM6 graphite makes for a very functional rod. I have a number of !M-6 graphites, and like them for their casting quality. I see creating a good taper as being quite easy with the computerized machines. And when you talk about "balance? That changes with the reel you put on the rod, and even the line.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

Sayfu,

On a side note. Drove to Maryland a couple days ago. Arrived at midnight, set up camp and hit the water at 12:30am dragging mouse flies across the big holes. Fished til 3:30am. Crawled into the tent for a few hours of shut eye, Back at it at 7:30am and fished til midnight. Taking one break to eat a sandwich. Never thought this old man still had that in him. Mice at night is my new favorite way to fly fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

buckhunter..sounds fun, wish I had your energy. I've steelheaded many a day, so that trophy hunting mentality appeals to me, and I don't lose interest because I haven't had a strike for awhile. Here on the SF, there are fly guys that will take vacation time, and camp out in the canyon, and fish off the gravel bars scheduling their fishing time when the moon is out. Browns chase minnows/bait fish into the shallows. This Summer, out here, because of the high water/standing water, you need good mosquito spray after the sun goes down especially.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

buckhunter...just thought of somethin. Way back in my aggressive days of catching steelhead, we use to do what you recently did...hit the hole at around midnite, and drift fish glow in the dark "drifters"/corkies that we'd energize with a flashbulb, or flashlight. Wonder if you could energize a mouse pattern? They have glow in the dark paints, and threads you could energize. Steelheaders would fish out a hole before the early birds got there at daybreak expecting to be the first anglers in the hole.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

Good idea. Had very little moon the first night and did OK but the second night we had plenty of moon and slayed them. Not sure if it was the moon or not. Deer hair mice make a lot of noise moving through the water. The only reason I quit at midnight was because my buddy was asleep on the river bank.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jrok6661 wrote 40 weeks 4 days ago

Bought my first fly rod about 3 years ago. First one cost me over a hundred dollars, and broke as soon as I took it out to use it. Next one I bought was less then half that, and I've had it ever since. I think about upgrading from time to time. I am not the most experienced fly fisherman. I am learning though. I just cant see replacing something that is not broken. If I do get a new one maybe this guy is the way to go.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment

from peconic wrote 41 weeks 15 hours ago

I have the 9' 4# and I LOVE IT!! And guess what? The hundreds of fish I have caught on it don't seem to care that I got for less than $200. Also must say I have fished next to plenty of guys with expensive rods and never felt like I didn't catch a fish or couldn't cast to a fish because of my rod.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 41 weeks 4 hours ago

I have to also make this observation about the rods I see on the market today. There is not much junk out there. The consumer is much more informed. Sloppy, poor performing rods don't sell, and go back a few years, and they had a lot of glass in them that made them sloppy. Not so today. A rod around $100 is generally a good rod, and often they will give you an across the counter guarantee rather than the time delay, and the expense of having an expensive rod replaced. A lot of it is about the action, and that can be personal according to your stroke. Few, want to talk about the action of the rod. I contacted the guy that originated the article about the expensive Sage Rod..THE ONE, that is supposed to cast so accurately. I asked him what the action was, and he said, "try it, it is very responsive" My thought is, "responsive for who?" And to many, owning an expensive rod is proud ownership. I drive a Hyundai, but sure would like to own a Porche.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

The way I see it, is..early on !M6 graphite made a good action rod. As the graphite matting increased in modulus allowing for a slightly lighter rod, and a stronger rod per wt. making for a quicker recovery rod there is a difference. It is negligible to most, and the cost is quite higher in part because the advanced graphite matting is considerably more expensive. Then they dress them up with more expensive hardware, and the person wanting such a rod is willing to pay the xtra price. Now, they are even using expensive epoxy in the high end rods. But, as you say, the hardware is quite acceptable, and the IM6 graphite makes for a very functional rod. I have a number of !M-6 graphites, and like them for their casting quality. I see creating a good taper as being quite easy with the computerized machines. And when you talk about "balance? That changes with the reel you put on the rod, and even the line.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 41 weeks 19 hours ago

Does Cabelas make it, or just mark up a rod made by someone else? I don't think they make it. What action are the rods?

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 40 weeks 6 days ago

Sayfu, I agree with your comment about the quality of rods on the market. Have purchased a couple beater rods (rods that I do not care if they break) over the last couple years and have been pleased with not just the action but the cork, guide wrappings and attached hardware. Has not changed my mind about expensive rods. I love them not just for the action but overall quality.

It is worth pointing out that any rod with the right line, leader and fly should cast good enough to catch fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

Sayfu,

On a side note. Drove to Maryland a couple days ago. Arrived at midnight, set up camp and hit the water at 12:30am dragging mouse flies across the big holes. Fished til 3:30am. Crawled into the tent for a few hours of shut eye, Back at it at 7:30am and fished til midnight. Taking one break to eat a sandwich. Never thought this old man still had that in him. Mice at night is my new favorite way to fly fish.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

buckhunter..sounds fun, wish I had your energy. I've steelheaded many a day, so that trophy hunting mentality appeals to me, and I don't lose interest because I haven't had a strike for awhile. Here on the SF, there are fly guys that will take vacation time, and camp out in the canyon, and fish off the gravel bars scheduling their fishing time when the moon is out. Browns chase minnows/bait fish into the shallows. This Summer, out here, because of the high water/standing water, you need good mosquito spray after the sun goes down especially.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from Sayfu wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

buckhunter...just thought of somethin. Way back in my aggressive days of catching steelhead, we use to do what you recently did...hit the hole at around midnite, and drift fish glow in the dark "drifters"/corkies that we'd energize with a flashbulb, or flashlight. Wonder if you could energize a mouse pattern? They have glow in the dark paints, and threads you could energize. Steelheaders would fish out a hole before the early birds got there at daybreak expecting to be the first anglers in the hole.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from buckhunter wrote 40 weeks 5 days ago

Good idea. Had very little moon the first night and did OK but the second night we had plenty of moon and slayed them. Not sure if it was the moon or not. Deer hair mice make a lot of noise moving through the water. The only reason I quit at midnight was because my buddy was asleep on the river bank.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jrok6661 wrote 40 weeks 4 days ago

Bought my first fly rod about 3 years ago. First one cost me over a hundred dollars, and broke as soon as I took it out to use it. Next one I bought was less then half that, and I've had it ever since. I think about upgrading from time to time. I am not the most experienced fly fisherman. I am learning though. I just cant see replacing something that is not broken. If I do get a new one maybe this guy is the way to go.

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Comment