Please Sign In

Please enter a valid username and password
» Not a member? Take a moment to register
» Forgot Username or Password

Why Register?
Signing up could earn you gear (click here to learn how)! It also keeps offensive content off our site.

Best New Shotgun 2009: Benelli Vinci

If Best of the Best were a beauty contest, the Vinci would not have won. The test of a shotgun is how it points and swings, however, and the Vinci passed with flying colors. This gun is light—6 pounds 14 ounces in a 26-inch-barreled, 3-inch 12-gauge—and uses a version of Benelli’s proven inertia action. It’s easy to load, thanks to the large bolt release, and the bolt lock is unobtrusively placed and easy to push. The trigger broke cleanly at 51⁄2 pounds. Only the location of the safety in the front of the trigger guard caused any grumbling.

 

The Vinci comes apart unlike any other shotgun. You can pop the barrel and receiver off in
less than five seconds for in-field maintenance. Better yet, the return spring sits in the ­receiver, not in a tube in the stock, so it’s easy to reach and clean. The recoil pad and buttstock both twist off ­without tools. -- Phil Bourjaily

 

Contact: 800-264-4962, benelliusa.com

Reviews (17)

Top Rated
All Reviews
from jbird wrote 22 weeks 5 days ago

Mr. Bourjaily, if Dave can't get me the E.R. Shaw rifle by Christmas due to backorders, this will do just fine as a substitute.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunt_Hard wrote 22 weeks 4 days ago

This gun is amazing! It is the same quality you would expect from Benelli and it has such a unique look to it. A quality shotgun.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from model_70_guy wrote 22 weeks 4 days ago

Well nothing says Merry Christmas like a new Benelli and as long as I am wishing this would be great in 20 ga.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Curveman wrote 22 weeks 4 days ago

Aesthetics matter to me in a recreational weapon. I’ll pass.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hjohn429 wrote 22 weeks 2 days ago

I hate the looks of this gun. I also hate the pricetag....
I would rather just get a real gun and buy a Mossberg or Remington.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from martin3175 wrote 22 weeks 4 hours ago

Would also pass .. $$$ and aesthetics ..

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WHAT wrote 21 weeks 6 days ago

don't care for the look of the gun

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dan_O wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

Being a left handed Dad with two right handed boys that I hope to pass along my shotguns to someday, the location of the safety is a deal breaker for me.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JSW wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

To expensive for a 3". If I would spend that for a upland gun it would have a classic look.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from slayer wrote 21 weeks 1 day ago

i realy wont this benelli. but to exspensive but it doest mater becuse i have the supper black hawk.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 20 weeks 6 days ago

I played with one of these the other day. The look is better in person and the balance it dang perfect. I used to moan about the cost of a Benelli until I finally got an M2. If you want semi-auto perfection that you just can't break they can't be beat. The Vinci has even less places for dirt, water, and other unpleasant things to hide. I am guessing its just as bullet proof.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cabohusky wrote 20 weeks 3 days ago

paying that much for this gun, it better come with dead birds with it or guarantee a hit everytime. ill stick with my 870 16g

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 19 weeks 2 days ago

I don't understand the the Italians. They make the most beautiful sports cars. They have incredible food. Their art is at the top of anyone's list. They have beautiful women. Their architecture.... And they have succeeded in creating a shotgun that is so ugly it would make a bulldog jump off a meatwagon.....And want to overcharge me for it too??? Pass.....I mean FAIL.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Curveman wrote 18 weeks 13 hours ago

Maxus. Less muzzle flip, less recoil, shoots 3.5 and cycles light lows flawlessly. Looks good too. Did the Editors even look at the Maxus or did Browning not pony up as much ad revenue? Frankly, what with the Team Leader as knife of the year one year etc., I've come to have little faith in F&S reviews.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from DougU wrote 14 weeks 3 days ago

It is ugly......but pick it up and swing it before you pass judgement....if it looked just a little better or was a little less expensive I would have one by now.

And not known to be a Benelli fan

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Winchester 92 wrote 7 weeks 18 hours ago

Really expensive... Really Ugly... but i guess a good looking gun won't shoot any better than an ugly one any way. If you can get past the price tag this gun seems to definately be worth it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from jwallen wrote 3 weeks 3 days ago

They are all ugly if the clay dosen't break or the bird dosen't fold!

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Review

from jbird wrote 22 weeks 5 days ago

Mr. Bourjaily, if Dave can't get me the E.R. Shaw rifle by Christmas due to backorders, this will do just fine as a substitute.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from model_70_guy wrote 22 weeks 4 days ago

Well nothing says Merry Christmas like a new Benelli and as long as I am wishing this would be great in 20 ga.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Curveman wrote 22 weeks 4 days ago

Aesthetics matter to me in a recreational weapon. I’ll pass.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from hjohn429 wrote 22 weeks 2 days ago

I hate the looks of this gun. I also hate the pricetag....
I would rather just get a real gun and buy a Mossberg or Remington.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Curveman wrote 18 weeks 13 hours ago

Maxus. Less muzzle flip, less recoil, shoots 3.5 and cycles light lows flawlessly. Looks good too. Did the Editors even look at the Maxus or did Browning not pony up as much ad revenue? Frankly, what with the Team Leader as knife of the year one year etc., I've come to have little faith in F&S reviews.

+2 Good Comment? | | Report
from Hunt_Hard wrote 22 weeks 4 days ago

This gun is amazing! It is the same quality you would expect from Benelli and it has such a unique look to it. A quality shotgun.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from martin3175 wrote 22 weeks 4 hours ago

Would also pass .. $$$ and aesthetics ..

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from WHAT wrote 21 weeks 6 days ago

don't care for the look of the gun

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Dan_O wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

Being a left handed Dad with two right handed boys that I hope to pass along my shotguns to someday, the location of the safety is a deal breaker for me.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from JSW wrote 21 weeks 5 days ago

To expensive for a 3". If I would spend that for a upland gun it would have a classic look.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from vtbluegrass wrote 20 weeks 6 days ago

I played with one of these the other day. The look is better in person and the balance it dang perfect. I used to moan about the cost of a Benelli until I finally got an M2. If you want semi-auto perfection that you just can't break they can't be beat. The Vinci has even less places for dirt, water, and other unpleasant things to hide. I am guessing its just as bullet proof.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Cabohusky wrote 20 weeks 3 days ago

paying that much for this gun, it better come with dead birds with it or guarantee a hit everytime. ill stick with my 870 16g

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from sgaredneck wrote 19 weeks 2 days ago

I don't understand the the Italians. They make the most beautiful sports cars. They have incredible food. Their art is at the top of anyone's list. They have beautiful women. Their architecture.... And they have succeeded in creating a shotgun that is so ugly it would make a bulldog jump off a meatwagon.....And want to overcharge me for it too??? Pass.....I mean FAIL.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from DougU wrote 14 weeks 3 days ago

It is ugly......but pick it up and swing it before you pass judgement....if it looked just a little better or was a little less expensive I would have one by now.

And not known to be a Benelli fan

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from Winchester 92 wrote 7 weeks 18 hours ago

Really expensive... Really Ugly... but i guess a good looking gun won't shoot any better than an ugly one any way. If you can get past the price tag this gun seems to definately be worth it.

+1 Good Comment? | | Report
from slayer wrote 21 weeks 1 day ago

i realy wont this benelli. but to exspensive but it doest mater becuse i have the supper black hawk.

0 Good Comment? | | Report
from jwallen wrote 3 weeks 3 days ago

They are all ugly if the clay dosen't break or the bird dosen't fold!

0 Good Comment? | | Report

Post a Review